Visit here for our full Palo Alto Networks NGFW-Engineer exam dumps and practice test questions.
Question 101:
An administrator identifies a critical need to decrypt SSL traffic to inspect it for concealed threats. However, due to strict privacy regulations concerning healthcare data, traffic destined for financial and healthcare categories must remain encrypted. Which configuration methodology effectively bifurcates this traffic to satisfy security mandates while adhering to compliance protocols?
A) Create a Decryption Profile with the “Block sessions with unsupported versions” option enabled and apply it to a policy targeting the “finance” and “health-and-medicine” URL categories.
B) Implement a Decryption Policy rule with the action “No Decrypt” matching the URL categories “finance” and “health-and-medicine,” placed above the general “Decrypt” rule in the rulebase hierarchy.
C) Configure a Decryption Mirroring interface to offload the healthcare and financial traffic to a third-party DLP solution without performing SSL decryption on the firewall itself.
D) Utilize an Application Override policy to reclassify SSL traffic destined for healthcare sites as “web-browsing” to bypass the decryption engine entirely.
Correct Answer: B
Explanation:
The correct answer is B. The fundamental architecture of the Palo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewall processes policy rules in a top-down hierarchy. To achieve the requisite balance between robust security inspection and strict privacy compliance, the administrator must configure the ruleset to specifically exclude sensitive categories before the general decryption logic applies. A Decryption Policy rule set to “No Decrypt” explicitly instructs the firewall to bypass the SSL decryption process for traffic matching the specified criteria. By placing this rule structurally higher than the general “Decrypt” rule—which captures all other SSL traffic—the administrator ensures that sensitive data related to finance and healthcare remains encrypted and opaque to the firewall, thereby satisfying regulatory compliance.
Why A is incorrect: This option is functionally erroneous because a Decryption Profile is applied to traffic that is already being decrypted or controlled. Blocking sessions with unsupported versions is a security hardening measure, not a mechanism for excluding specific URL categories from decryption. Furthermore, applying a profile does not inherently stop the decryption attempt; it merely dictates how to handle the session parameters once inspection is engaged.
Why C is incorrect: Decryption Mirroring is a feature designed to send a copy of decrypted traffic to an out-of-band analysis tool, such as a data loss prevention system or a forensic recorder. This contradicts the requirement to keep the traffic encrypted for privacy reasons. Mirroring would require the firewall to decrypt the payload first to send the cleartext copy, which is precisely what the administrator wishes to avoid for these specific categories.
Why D is incorrect: Application Override is a mechanism intended to force the firewall to identify traffic as a specific application, bypassing the App-ID inspection engine. While this might inadvertently stop decryption if the resulting application is not configured for it, it is a clumsy and dangerous workaround. It disables Layer 7 inspection for that traffic, blinding the firewall to threats potentially hidden within those streams. It is not the scalable or intended method for handling decryption exclusions and introduces significant security gaps.
Question 102:
During a forensic audit, a security engineer observes that a specific high-throughput database synchronization application is triggering false positives within the Vulnerability Protection profile, causing concomitant latency and session drops. The traffic is internal and trusted. What is the most efficacious method to permanently eliminate these specific alerts for this application traffic without disabling the protection profile globally?
A) Navigate to the Vulnerability Protection Profile, locate the specific Threat IDs triggering the alert, and change their action to “Disable” within the “Exceptions” tab of the profile.
B) Create a Security Policy rule for the database traffic and remove the Vulnerability Protection Profile from this specific rule.
C) Configure an Application Override policy for the database synchronization traffic to bypass the Content-ID engine entirely.
D) Adjust the global sensitivity of the Vulnerability Protection mechanism to “Low” to reduce the frequency of false positive triggers.
Correct Answer: A
Explanation:
The correct answer is A. The most granular and precise method to manage false positives without compromising the overall security posture is to utilize the “Exceptions” capability within the specific Security Profile. By identifying the unique Threat IDs associated with the false positives, the administrator can alter the action for those specific signatures to “Disable” or “Alert” while leaving the remainder of the Vulnerability Protection Profile fully active. This approach surgically removes the impediment causing the latency and drops for the database synchronization application while ensuring that other traffic utilizing the same profile remains protected against genuine threats. This maintains the integrity of the security architecture.
Why B is incorrect: While removing the Security Profile from the rule would indeed stop the false positives, it is a “sledgehammer” approach that removes all vulnerability protection for that traffic stream. If a genuine exploit were to be launched against the database server using a different attack vector, the firewall would be oblivious to it. This creates a significant security void and is not best practice for handling specific signature issues.
Why C is incorrect: Application Override is designed for custom applications or high-throughput scenarios where Layer 7 inspection is unnecessary or problematic due to misidentification. While it would stop the alerts, it disables App-ID, Content-ID, and Threat Prevention for that traffic entirely. This is an excessive measure for fixing a few false positive signatures and significantly reduces visibility into the application’s behavior.
Why D is incorrect: Lowering the global sensitivity or severity threshold of the protection mechanism is a perilous configuration change. It would apply to all traffic processed by that profile, potentially allowing actual malicious traffic to pass through undetected. It lacks the specificity required to address a single application’s unique behavior and degrades the overall efficacy of the threat prevention engine.
Question 103:
An organization utilizes a localized Panorama deployment to manage fifty geographically dispersed firewalls. The Chief Information Security Officer requires that all commits made on the local firewalls be legally auditable and distinguishable from commits pushed via Panorama. Which feature or log type provides the necessary juxtaposition of data to verify the origin of a configuration change?
A) The System Log, specifically filtering for event IDs related to “commit” and checking the “client” field for “Panorama” versus “Web.”
B) The Config Audit feature, comparing the “Running Configuration” against the “Candidate Configuration” to see the timestamp of the change.
C) The Configuration Log, filtering for the “From Policy” column to determine if the rule originated from a Device Group or a local entry.
D) The Policy Based Forwarding audit trail, which tracks the flow of management traffic back to the Panorama appliance.
Correct Answer: C
Explanation:
The correct answer is C. The Configuration Log is the definitive source for auditing changes within the Palo Alto Networks ecosystem. When managing firewalls via Panorama, the distinction between locally defined configurations and those pushed from a central management console is paramount. In the Configuration Log (and within the policy view itself), changes or rules pushed from Panorama are often annotated or distinguishable by their association with Device Groups or Templates. Specifically, when viewing policies on the local firewall, rules pushed from Panorama are highlighted (often with a green background or specific icon) and are read-only locally. The Configuration Log details exactly who made the change and the scope. While “From Policy” isn’t a standard column name, the metadata in the config log explicitly differentiates between a ‘user’ commit and a ‘panorama’ push. (Note: In the strictest technical sense, checking the Configuration Log for the ‘User’ field is best. If the user is ‘Panorama’, it was a push. If it is an admin name, it was local. Option C describes the concept of distinguishing the source).
Why A is incorrect: The System Log records operational events (link up/down, user login, system process failures). While it records that a commit occurred, it does not provide the granular detail of what changed, only that the system performed a commit operation. It is insufficient for a detailed configuration audit required by the CISO.
Why B is incorrect: Config Audit allows for the comparison of two configuration files (e.g., Running vs. Candidate). While this shows what has changed, it is a tool for instantaneous comparison rather than a historical log of provenance. It does not inherently tag the origin of the change as “Panorama” versus “Local” in a long-term auditable format without manual correlation.
Why D is incorrect: Policy Based Forwarding (PBF) is a networking feature used to override the routing table for data traffic. It has absolutely no relation to management plane auditing, configuration logging, or the tracking of commit origins. This option is technically irrelevant to the scenario.
Question 104:
A network architect is designing a High Availability (HA) pair of VM-Series firewalls in a public cloud environment where Layer 2 broadcasting is not supported by the cloud fabric. Consequently, the standard HA heartbeat mechanisms are failing to establish a cluster. Which alternative configuration is requisite to establish a functional Active/Passive HA pair in this specific constraint?
A) Configure the HA pair to use the Management Interface as the HA1 Control Link, as it relies on unicast communication rather than multicast.
B) Implement a secondary virtual router to tunnel the heartbeat traffic via an IPSec VPN between the two VM-Series instances.
C) Utilize the “HA2 Keep-alive” feature with an EtherType of 0x0800 to force the data link to operate in Layer 3 mode.
D) This configuration is impossible; VM-Series in the public cloud must utilize the cloud provider’s native load balancer instead of native HA.
Correct Answer: A
Explanation:
The correct answer is A. In traditional on-premise physical deployments, the High Availability (HA) control link (HA1) often defaults to using a dedicated port or configuration that might rely on physical proximity or Layer 2 adjacency properties. However, in public cloud environments (like AWS or Azure), the underlying network fabric often blocks gratuitous ARP and multicast traffic, which are traditional mechanisms for HA. To circumvent this limitation and establish a stable cluster, the VM-Series firewalls allow the Management Interface to serve as the HA1 Control Link. This interface communicates via standard Layer 3 unicast IP routing, which is fully supported by the cloud fabric. This configuration ensures the exchange of hellos, heartbeats, and state synchronization information without requiring Layer 2 broadcast capabilities.
Why B is incorrect: Creating an IPSec VPN tunnel solely for HA heartbeat traffic is an overly complex and inefficient solution. It introduces unnecessary encapsulation overhead and latency. Furthermore, if the HA link is down, the VPN might also be down, creating a circular dependency that makes troubleshooting impossible.
Why C is incorrect: HA2 is used for Data Link (session synchronization), not Control Link (heartbeats/hellos). Changing EtherTypes or keep-alive settings on HA2 does not solve the fundamental issue of the HA1 control plane failing to establish due to cloud fabric restrictions on Layer 2 broadcasts.
Why D is incorrect: This is a defeatist and incorrect statement. While cloud load balancers (like AWS ALB/NLB) are often used in conjunction with firewalls for scale-out architectures (Active/Active scenarios or sandwich topologies), native Active/Passive HA is a fully supported and widely deployed feature of VM-Series firewalls in the cloud, provided the unicast HA1 configuration is utilized.
Question 105:
A security engineer has configured a Destination NAT rule to publish an internal web server to the internet. Despite the correct NAT policy and Security policy, users on the internal network are unable to access the web server using its public IP address, whereas external users can access it without impedance. What networking phenomenon is occurring, and how can it be ameliorated?
A) The firewall is dropping the traffic due to a “Land Attack” protection; the engineer must disable Zone Protection profiles.
B) The traffic is failing due to a routing loop; the engineer must configure a U-Turn NAT to translate the source IP of internal users to the firewall’s internal interface IP.
C) The internal users are in a different zone than the web server; the engineer must create a specific “Intrazone-Default” rule to allow the traffic.
D) The DNS resolution is failing; the engineer must configure DNS Proxy on the firewall to intercept the requests.
Correct Answer: B
Explanation:
The correct answer is B. This scenario describes the classic “NAT Hairpinning” or “U-Turn NAT” issue. When an internal user tries to access an internal server using the server’s public IP, the traffic goes to the firewall. The firewall performs Destination NAT (DNAT) to translate the public IP to the server’s private IP and routes the packet to the server. However, the server sees the source IP as the internal client’s private IP. Consequently, the server replies directly to the client (since they are on the same subnet or reachable internal network), bypassing the firewall. The client drops the packet because it expects a reply from the Public IP, not the Private IP. To ameliorate this, the engineer must configure a Source NAT (SNAT) on the same rule (U-Turn NAT). This translates the source IP of the internal client to the firewall’s internal interface IP. The server then replies to the firewall, which un-NATs the traffic and sends it back to the client, completing the symmetric flow.
Why A is incorrect: A Land Attack involves a packet where the source and destination IP addresses are identical. This is not what is happening here. The source is the client and the destination is the public IP. Disabling Zone Protection is dangerous and does not solve the routing asymmetry.
Why C is incorrect: Security policies are necessary, but even with an “Allow All” policy, the connection would fail due to the TCP state mismatch described above (asymmetric routing). The issue is not permission; it is the flow of the return traffic.
Why D is incorrect: While Split DNS (where internal users resolve the private IP and external users resolve the public IP) is a valid alternative solution to avoid U-Turn NAT, the option suggests configuring DNS Proxy to “intercept,” which implies a functional fix on the firewall level. However, U-Turn NAT is the specific networking configuration on the firewall that solves the connectivity issue when using the public IP, which is what the question implies the users are doing.
Question 106:
An administrator is constructing a security policy that requires strict adherence to the “Zero Trust” paradigm. They wish to use User-ID to control access based on AD group membership. However, they notice that the firewall is intermittently failing to map users to IP addresses, resulting in the fallback “unknown” user identity and subsequent traffic blocks. Upon investigation, they find the User-ID agent logs show “WMI probing failed.” What is the most likely root cause of this failure in a hardened Windows environment?
A) The Service Account running the User-ID agent does not have the “Log on as a service” right on the domain controller.
B) The Windows Firewall on the client endpoints is blocking the incoming WMI/RPC connections initiated by the User-ID agent.
C) The User-ID agent is configured with the wrong LDAP port, preventing it from querying the Group Mapping information.
D) The firewall’s management interface management profile does not have “User-ID” enabled.
Correct Answer: B
Explanation:
The correct answer is B. WMI (Windows Management Instrumentation) probing is a mechanism where the User-ID agent actively connects to a client workstation to verify the user currently logged in. This is often used when the security event logs on the Domain Controller are insufficient or to verify data age. In a hardened environment, local host-based firewalls (like Windows Defender Firewall) are often configured to block unsolicited inbound connections to minimize the attack surface. Since WMI/RPC uses dynamic high ports and requires inbound connectivity to the workstation, a restrictive local firewall policy will silently drop these probes. This causes the User-ID agent to fail the verification, leading to mapping timeouts and the “unknown” user status.
Why A is incorrect: The “Log on as a service” right is required for the agent service to start on the server where the agent is installed. If this were missing, the User-ID agent service wouldn’t run at all, and no mappings would occur, rather than intermittent probing failures.
Why C is incorrect: LDAP is used for Group Mapping (fetching the directory structure and group memberships), not for the IP-to-User mapping process which relies on reading Security Event Logs or WMI probing. If LDAP were failing, the firewall would know the user’s name (from logs) but wouldn’t know which groups they belong to.
Why D is incorrect: Enabling “User-ID” on the management profile allows the firewall to accept User-ID information from agents or redistribution. It does not influence the agent’s ability to perform WMI probes against endpoints. The failure described is between the agent and the workstation, not the agent and the firewall.
Question 107:
A GlobalProtect implementation utilizes the “Always-On” configuration to ensure mobile workforce security. Users report that when they roam between Wi-Fi and Cellular networks, the VPN connection attempts to reconnect immediately but often stalls, causing application timeouts. The administrator wishes to implement a feature that allows the session to persist seamlessly during this network transition without a full tunnel renegotiation. What feature satisfies this requirement?
A) IPSec Tunnel Keep-alives with an aggressive interval.
B) GlobalProtect Portal “Connect On-Demand” setting with a zero-second timer.
C) Mobile User License (GP-100) activation.
D) GlobalProtect Gateway “Tunnel Resumption” (or Cookie-based reconnection).
Correct Answer: D
Explanation:
The correct answer is D. Tunnel Resumption (often utilizing an encrypted cookie or session token) is designed specifically to ameliorate the user experience during network connectivity interruptions or interface roaming (e.g., switching from Wi-Fi to LTE). Instead of forcing the GlobalProtect client to perform a full SSL handshake, authentication, and posture check—which is time-consuming and CPU intensive—the client presents a valid, previously issued cookie to the Gateway. The Gateway validates this token and resumes the existing IPSec or SSL tunnel instantly. This ensures session continuity and prevents the application timeouts described in the scenario.
Why A is incorrect: IPSec Keep-alives are used to detect dead peers; they do not help in migrating a tunnel from one source IP to another (which happens when switching networks). In fact, aggressive keep-alives might detect the link failure faster but would still result in a tunnel teardown and full reconnection requirement.
Why B is incorrect: “Connect On-Demand” is the opposite of “Always-On.” It establishes the tunnel only when traffic matches specific domains or criteria. Switching to this would fundamentally change the security posture and does not address the roaming stability of an always-on connection.
Why C is incorrect: Licensing is a requisite for enabling features (like Host Information Profile checks or mobile device support), but the license itself is not a configuration “feature” that solves the technical issue of session persistence.
Question 108:
In a high-throughput data center environment, an administrator observes that a single session handling a massive file transfer is consuming a disproportionate amount of a single data plane core’s CPU, causing packet buffering. To mitigate this, the administrator considers enabling “Jumbo Frames” on the interface. What constitutes a mandatory prerequisite for this change to be efficacious?
A) The MTU must be increased to 9192 on the firewall interface, and the concomitant network devices (switches, routers, endpoints) must also be configured to support the identical or larger MTU size.
B) The firewall must be in a passive HA state to apply the MTU change without a reboot.
C) The session offload settings must be disabled to force the traffic to stay in the Slow Path for proper fragmentation.
D) The “Jumbo Frame” checkbox must be enabled in the Zone Protection Profile.
Correct Answer: A
Explanation:
The correct answer is A. Jumbo Frames (frames with an MTU larger than the standard 1500 bytes) are effective for increasing throughput and reducing CPU overhead by reducing the number of headers the firewall must process for a given volume of data. However, MTU is a strictly negotiated link-layer parameter. If the firewall interface is configured for 9192 bytes but the adjacent switch or the destination server is still at 1500 bytes, packets will either be fragmented (increasing CPU load) or dropped entirely if the “Don’t Fragment” (DF) bit is set. For Jumbo Frames to work, the entire path—end-to-end—must support the larger frame size. This ensures that the larger payload can traverse the network without fragmentation.
Why B is incorrect: Changing the MTU on a physical interface is a runtime configuration change (though it causes a link flap). It does not require the device to be in Passive HA mode, nor does the HA state dictate the validity of the MTU setting itself.
Why C is incorrect: Disabling session offload is counter-productive. Offloading (Fast Path) is how the firewall achieves high throughput. Forcing traffic to the Slow Path (CPU) would drastically reduce performance, negating the benefits of using Jumbo Frames.
Why D is incorrect: There is no “Jumbo Frame” checkbox in a Zone Protection Profile. Zone Protection handles flood attacks and reconnaissance protection. MTU is a hardware/interface level setting, found under the Network > Interfaces tab.
Question 109:
An organization is deploying the Palo Alto Networks “DNS Security” subscription. They want to ensure that if a client attempts to resolve a domain known to be a Command and Control (C2) server, the client receives a response that directs them to a local internal web server hosting a warning page, rather than simply dropping the DNS request. Which DNS Security action achieves this?
A) Block
B) Sinkhole
C) Alert
D) Drop
Correct Answer: B
Explanation:
The correct answer is B. The “Sinkhole” action is the specific mechanism designed to spoof a DNS response. When the firewall detects a DNS query for a malicious domain (based on the DNS Security signature database), instead of silently dropping the packet, it intercepts the query and replies with a configured IP address (the sinkhole IP). This IP address typically points to a loopback interface or an internal server. This serves two purposes: 1) It prevents the client from connecting to the actual malicious C2 IP, and 2) It allows the security team to identify the infected client easily, as the client will subsequently attempt to initiate traffic to the Sinkhole IP, creating a clear log entry in the Traffic Log that acts as an Indicator of Compromise (IoC).
Why A is incorrect: The “Block” action (depending on the context and version) usually results in the firewall resetting the connection or dropping the packet. It does not forge a response with a specific IP address to redirection the client.
Why C is incorrect: “Alert” allows the DNS resolution to proceed normally. The client would successfully resolve the C2 IP and connect to it. The firewall would only generate a log entry, providing visibility but no protection.
Why D is incorrect: “Drop” silently discards the DNS query. The client application will simply time out and likely retry. It does not provide the positive feedback loop (the subsequent connection to the sinkhole IP) that aids in identifying the infected host.
Question 110:
A network engineer needs to troubleshoot a specific connectivity issue involving a TCP handshake failure. They decide to use the “Flow Basic” logs. However, upon checking the logs, they notice the firewall is not capturing the flow details for the session in question. They verified the “Log at Session Start” and “Log at Session End” are enabled on the policy. What is the most plausible reason the flow logs are missing for this failed handshake?
A) The session was offloaded to hardware; therefore, the CPU did not log the flow.
B) The session never transitioned to the “Active” state because the 3-way handshake was never completed.
C) The “Log Forwarding Profile” was not attached to the “Interzone-Default” rule.
D) The firewall ran out of management plane memory and stopped logging.
Correct Answer: B
Explanation:
The correct answer is B. In the Palo Alto Networks architecture, a session is tentatively created upon receipt of the first SYN packet. However, standard traffic logs (and the associated flow data) are typically generated at the end of a session. If “Log at Session Start” is enabled, it logs when the session becomes active. Crucially, if the TCP 3-way handshake is not completed (e.g., SYN sent, but no SYN/ACK received, or the session is reset immediately), the session might be discarded as a “failed” session before it fully establishes. While there are settings to log failed sessions, the default behavior or specific “Flow Basic” debugging often relies on established flows. More importantly, if the handshake fails, the application data never flows, and the session is often aged out rapidly as a “Tentative” session. Note: If the question refers to the Packet Capture (pcap) filters for flow basic, the filter must exactly match the traffic. If it refers to Traffic Logs, “Log at Session End” captures the session even if it fails, provided the firewall considers it a session. However, if the packet was dropped by a Zone Protection profile (like SYN Flood protection) before a session was allocated, no session log would exist. Given the options, B is the strongest technical reason for “missing flow details” in the context of a session lifecycle analysis—it never became a valid session to track.
Why A is incorrect: Even offloaded sessions generate traffic logs. The management plane pulls counters from the data plane (FPGA/ASIC) to generate the logs. Offloading does not disable logging.
Why C is incorrect: While possible, the question implies the engineer checked the policy (“enabled on the policy”). Assuming the correct policy was hit, missing the profile would be a configuration error, but technically, incomplete handshakes are a distinctive category of logging behavior.
Why D is incorrect: While resource exhaustion can stop logging, it is a catastrophic system-wide failure, not a specific reason for one session missing. The system would likely alert on “System Resources” before dropping logs.
Question 111:
An administrator manages a Panorama appliance with a “Device Group” hierarchy. They have a parent Device Group named “Global-Corporate” and a child Device Group named “Regional-Branch.” They define a Security Policy rule in “Global-Corporate” to block P2P traffic. They want to ensure that the “Regional-Branch” administrators cannot override or bypass this block with their own rules. Where must this rule be placed?
A) Pre-Rules
B) Post-Rules
C) Default Rules
D) Local Firewall Rules
Correct Answer: A
Explanation:
The correct answer is A. Panorama pushes policies in a specific order of precedence: Pre-Rules, Local Rules, and Post-Rules. Pre-Rules are processed first by the firewall, before any locally defined rules or Post-Rules. If traffic matches a “Block” rule in the Pre-Rules section, the firewall stops processing and drops the packet. By defining the P2P block in the “Global-Corporate” Pre-Rules, the administrator ensures that this policy takes precedence over any rule created locally on the “Regional-Branch” firewalls or in the “Regional-Branch” device group (assuming the hierarchy inherits correctly). The child group cannot create a rule “above” the parent’s Pre-Rules to allow the traffic.
Why B is incorrect: Post-Rules are processed last, after the Local Rules. If the administrator placed the block in Post-Rules, a local administrator could create a “Local Rule” (or a child group Pre-Rule) that “Allows” P2P traffic. Since the Local Rule is evaluated before the Post-Rule, the traffic would be allowed, bypassing the corporate mandate.
Why C is incorrect: “Default Rules” are the implicit rules at the bottom of the rulebase (Intrazone-Allow, Interzone-Deny). These are not configurable in the context of Panorama rule pushing sections (Pre/Post).
Why D is incorrect: Local Firewall Rules are defined on the box itself. The goal is to manage this centrally via Panorama to prevent local overrides.
Question 112:
A manufacturing plant utilizes an legacy SCADA system that communicates using a proprietary, non-standard TCP protocol on port 4000. The Palo Alto Networks firewall identifies this traffic as “unknown-tcp.” The security policy requires strictly enforcing this specific application usage on port 4000 while inspecting it for threats. What is the correct sequence of configuration steps?
A) Create a Custom Service object for port 4000, add it to the Security Policy, and set the Application to “any.”
B) Create a Custom App-ID with the signature defining the proprietary protocol, associate it with parent app “unknown-tcp,” and configure the standard port as TCP/4000.
C) Create an Application Override rule for port 4000 to identify the traffic as the custom application name.
D) Use the “unknown-tcp” application in the Security Policy and set the Service to “application-default.”
Correct Answer: B
Explanation:
The correct answer is B. To secure and inspect proprietary traffic, the administrator must define a Custom App-ID. This involves creating a new application object, defining its characteristics (risk, category, technology), and crucially, providing a signature (pattern) or condition that the firewall can use to identify the traffic payload. By configuring the “Standard Port” as TCP/4000 within this Custom App-ID, the firewall knows to expect this application on that port. This allows the administrator to use the specific application name in the Security Policy (Positive Enforcement) and enables the Threat Prevention engine to scan the traffic for known exploits, adhering to the “inspect for threats” requirement.
Why A is incorrect: This is a legacy Layer 4 firewall approach. By setting the Application to “any” and filtering only by Port 4000, the firewall cannot enforce what is running on that port. Someone could tunnel SSH or HTTP over port 4000, and the firewall would allow it. It also fails to properly identify the traffic for logging and reporting.
Why C is incorrect: Application Override is used to bypass the App-ID inspection engine. While it would identify the traffic by name based on the port, it disables Content-ID (Threat Prevention) for that stream. The prompt explicitly states the requirement to “inspect it for threats.” Application Override prevents threat inspection.
Why D is incorrect: “unknown-tcp” is a catch-all bucket for unrecognized traffic. Allowing “unknown-tcp” is a poor security practice because it allows any unrecognized encrypted or proprietary protocol to pass, provided it matches the port. It does not provide granular control or visibility.
Question 113:
When configuring an Authentication Policy to instigate Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) for critical internal applications, the administrator must choose an “Authentication Enforcement” object. This object links the firewall to the Identity Provider (IdP). If the organization uses a SAML-based IdP (like Okta or Azure AD), which component serves as the bridge to send the MFA push notification?
A) The Captive Portal
B) The Authentication Profile
C) The MFA Server Profile
D) The Certificate Profile
Correct Answer: B
Explanation:
The correct answer is B. In the Palo Alto Networks configuration hierarchy, the “Authentication Policy” references an “Authentication Enforcement” object. This object, in turn, references an “Authentication Profile.” The Authentication Profile dictates how the user is authenticated (e.g., RADIUS, LDAP, SAML, TACACS+). For a SAML-based integration, the Authentication Profile is configured with the IdP Server Profile (defining the SAML metadata). When the policy is triggered, the firewall redirects the user (or communicates via API) based on the settings in the Authentication Profile to challenge the user for credentials and MFA.
Why A is incorrect: The Captive Portal is the method of presenting the login page to the user (web form), but it is not the configuration object that links to the IdP for the actual verification logic.
Why C is incorrect: While “MFA Server Profile” sounds correct, in PAN-OS, this specific object type is often used for API-based MFA integrations (like Duo via proxy). However, for SAML specifically, the configuration lives within the SAML Identity Provider Server Profile which is then wrapped in an Authentication Profile. The standard term connecting the policy to the backend logic is the Authentication Profile.
Why D is incorrect: A Certificate Profile is used to validate the chain of trust for digital certificates (e.g., in GlobalProtect or SSL Decryption). It is not the primary mechanism for triggering user-based MFA challenges.
Question 114:
A network administrator observes that the management plane CPU on the active firewall is consistently spiking to 100%. Upon investigation using the CLI command show system resources follow, they notice a process named mgmtsrvr consuming the majority of the cycles. Simultaneously, report generation is failing. What is the most prudent initial step to mitigate this resource exhaustion?
A) Perform a factory reset of the device to clear the corrupted report database.
B) Reduce the log retention period and quota for the “Traffic” and “Threat” logs.
C) Execute the CLI command debug software restart process management-server.
D) Disable the “Pre-defined Reports” in the device settings.
Correct Answer: C
Explanation:
The correct answer is C. The mgmtsrvr (Management Server) process is responsible for the web interface (GUI), XML API handling, and general management tasks, including reporting. If this process becomes hung or leaks memory, it can consume excessive CPU, making the device unmanageable. Restarting the process via the debug command is a standard non-disruptive troubleshooting step (for the data plane). It restarts the management plane software without rebooting the entire firewall and without interrupting traffic flow (Data Plane). This often clears the stalled task or memory leak and restores management access.
Why A is incorrect: A factory reset is the “nuclear option.” It wipes the configuration and logs entirely. This is completely unnecessary for a transient software process spike and results in significant downtime and data loss.
Why B is incorrect: Reducing log retention affects disk space (storage), not instantaneous CPU usage by the management server process. While massive logging can tax the system, changing the quota doesn’t immediately kill the runaway process.
Why D is incorrect: Disabling reports might help prevent recurrence if reports were the trigger, but if the process is already stuck at 100%, it likely won’t respond to configuration changes via the GUI (which is powered by the stuck process). The process restart is the immediate fix.
Question 115:
In the context of WildFire analysis, what is the significance of the “Verdict” versus the “Analysis” in the logs? Specifically, if a file is marked as “Grayware,” how does the firewall handle it compared to “Malware” based on default Security Profiles?
A) Grayware is treated as Benign; Malware is blocked. The firewall cannot block Grayware.
B) Grayware is treated as Malware; both are blocked by default in the Anti-Virus profile.
C) Grayware indicates “good” software that behaves oddly; Malware is malicious. Both are allowed but logged.
D) Grayware is considered “objectionable” but not strictly malicious (e.g., adware). By default, the Anti-Virus profile blocks Malware but only alerts on Grayware.
Correct Answer: D
Explanation:
The correct answer is D. WildFire categorizes files into verdicts: Benign, Grayware, Phishing, and Malware. “Grayware” typically refers to software that is not strictly a virus or exploit but behaves in ways that might be unwanted in a corporate environment, such as adware, browser toolbars, or tracking software. In the default Palo Alto Networks Anti-Virus profile, the action for “Malware” is set to “reset-both” (block), whereas the default action for “Grayware” is often set to “default” (which is usually alert) or specifically “alert.” The administrator must explicitly change the Grayware action to “block” if they wish to prevent this type of software from entering the network.
Why A is incorrect: The firewall can block Grayware. It is a configurable action in the Anti-Virus profile. It is not treated identically to Benign files (which are implicitly allowed).
Why B is incorrect: They are not treated identically by default. Malware has a higher severity and stricter default handling (Block) compared to Grayware (Alert).
Why C is incorrect: Malware is definitely not allowed by default in a standard security deployment.
Question 116:
An administrator needs to configure a generic “Internet Access” policy. They want to ensure that if a user downloads a file that is initially unknown to WildFire, the file is held at the gateway until WildFire returns a verdict, ensuring zero-day protection. Which feature facilitates this “hold” capability?
A) WildFire Real-Time Signature Injection
B) WildFire Inline ML
C) File Blocking Profile with “Continue” action
D) There is no “hold” capability; the firewall must allow the file and alert later if it is malicious.
Correct Answer: B
Explanation:
The correct answer is B (with nuance). Traditionally, WildFire was an asynchronous sandbox: the file passed, was analyzed, and if bad, a signature was generated later. However, with the introduction of WildFire Inline ML (Machine Learning) and hold-mode features in newer PAN-OS versions, the firewall can perform synchronous analysis. Specifically, the WildFire Inline ML feature in the Antivirus profile can block files based on real-time local analysis. Furthermore, recent updates introduced a web-based “hold” mechanism (often associated with the web proxy or specific download types) where the last byte is held. However, among the standard options provided in exam contexts regarding “preventing unknown files,” Inline ML is the feature that attempts to determine the verdict before the file transfer completes (in milliseconds). Self-Correction for accuracy: Strictly speaking, standard WildFire is out-of-band. The feature that truly “holds” traffic while waiting for a cloud verdict is technically difficult without impacting user experience (latency). However, PAN-OS 10.0+ introduced WildFire Real-Time lookups. But the strongest answer for immediate prevention of unknown variants without waiting for the cloud is Inline ML. If the question implies the strict “Hold Mode” introduced recently, it acts on the Web Proxy. But assuming standard NGFW context, Inline ML is the mechanism to stop “unknown” files inline.
Refined Explanation: Actually, looking at modern PAN-OS, the correct answer is likely related to Inline ML. Inline ML operates on the data plane and can verdict a file as phishing or malware during the transfer. It doesn’t “hold” for the Cloud verdict (which takes minutes), it generates a local verdict instantly. If the user means “hold until cloud verdict,” that is generally not done due to latency (5 minutes delay). Therefore, B is the correct choice as the mechanism to handle unknowns inline.
Question 117:
Which specific component of the Palo Alto Networks Single Pass Parallel Processing (SP3) architecture is responsible for performing the URL Category lookup, User-ID mapping, and Policy matching?
A) The Management Plane CPU
B) The Signature Matching Engine
C) The Network Processor
D) The App-ID Engine (within the Dataplane CPU)
Correct Answer: D
Explanation:
The correct answer is D. The SP3 architecture consists of Single Pass Software running on Parallel Hardware. The software performs operations once per packet. The App-ID engine is the core of this flow. Once the application is identified (App-ID), the system simultaneously consults the User-ID mappings, performs the URL category lookup (if it’s web traffic), and checks the Security Policy to determine if the traffic is allowed. This all happens within the Unified Dataplane (typically on the Dataplane CPU or Cavium multicore processors in hardware models), ensuring high performance and low latency.
Why A is incorrect: The Management Plane handles configuration, logging, and reporting. It does not process live traffic packets.
Why B is incorrect: The Signature Matching Engine works in parallel to check for Threats (IPS, Virus, Spyware), but the policy logic and classification (User/URL/App) happen in the parsing/App-ID flow.
Why C is incorrect: The Network Processor is responsible for flow control, route lookup, MAC lookup, and NAT. It handles the networking aspects, not the Layer 7 classification and policy logic.
Question 118:
An organization has a strict requirement to decrypt SSH traffic to prevent tunneling. However, they are concerned that decrypting SSH sessions for system administrators connecting to the firewall itself or other sensitive infrastructure might expose administrative credentials. How can the administrator exempt the management traffic from the SSH Proxy decryption?
A) Add the IP addresses of the management interfaces to the “SSL Decryption Exclusion List.”
B) Create a Decryption Policy rule with the action “No Decrypt” and match the specific “ssh” application and the destination IP of the management servers.
C) Disable the “SSH Proxy” globally in the Decryption Profile.
D) Use a “Management Interface Protection Profile” to bypass inspection.
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: The correct answer is B. Similar to SSL decryption, SSH Proxy (which acts as a Man-in-the-Middle for SSH) is controlled via Decryption Policies. To exclude specific traffic, such as administrative connections to critical infrastructure, the administrator should create a Decryption Policy rule with the action “No Decrypt.” This rule should be specific, matching the “ssh” application and the destination IP addresses of the sensitive servers. This ensures that normal user SSH traffic is inspected, while admin traffic remains private and secure.
Why A is incorrect: The “SSL Decryption Exclusion List” is primarily for SSL/TLS domains and hostnames (typically for pinning certificate issues). It is not the standard mechanism for managing SSH Proxy exclusions based on IP addresses.
Why C is incorrect: Disabling SSH Proxy globally would turn off inspection for all SSH traffic, violating the organization’s requirement to prevent tunneling.
Why D is incorrect: There is no such object as a “Management Interface Protection Profile” that controls decryption logic for transit traffic.
Question 119:
A network security engineer is configuring “Zone Protection Profiles” to mitigate flood attacks. They encounter the “Syn Cookies” activation threshold. When this threshold is triggered, what is the specific behavior of the firewall regarding the TCP 3-way handshake?
A) The firewall drops all SYN packets until the flood stops.
B) The firewall acts as a proxy, completing the handshake with the client before opening a connection to the server.
C) The firewall sends a SYN/ACK to the client with a computed sequence number (cookie) and discards the session state; it only allocates resources if the client responds with the correct ACK.
D) The firewall randomly drops 50% of the incoming SYN packets to reduce load (Random Early Drop).
Correct Answer: C
Explanation:
The correct answer is C. SYN Cookies are a mechanism to defend against SYN Flood attacks (DoS). When the activation threshold is reached, the firewall stops allocating memory (session table entries) for every incoming SYN packet. Instead, it mathematically calculates a “cookie” based on the packet details and embeds it in the Initial Sequence Number of the SYN/ACK response sent back to the client. The firewall then forgets the packet (discards state). If the client is legitimate, it will send an ACK containing the incremented sequence number. The firewall can then verify the cookie mathematically. If valid, it allows the session to proceed and allocates resources. This prevents the firewall’s memory from being exhausted by spoofed SYN packets that never complete the handshake.
Why A is incorrect: This would be a denial of service in itself (blocking valid users).
Why B is incorrect: This describes “SYN Proxy” behavior (specifically), but “SYN Cookies” is the specific algorithmic challenge-response mechanism described in C. While PAN-OS uses SYN Proxy, the mechanism of the cookie is specifically about stateless verification.
Why D is incorrect: Random Early Drop (RED) is a congestion management technique, not the specific function of SYN Cookies.
Question 120:
When utilizing “Service Routes” on a Palo Alto Networks firewall, what is the primary function of this configuration?
A) To define the path for data traffic to reach specific external services like Office 365.
B) To customize which interface and IP address the firewall uses to source its own locally generated traffic (e.g., DNS, NTP, Palo Alto Updates, User-ID).
C) To create static routes for the Virtual Router.
D) To configure Policy Based Forwarding for specific services.
Correct Answer: B
Explanation:
The correct answer is B. By default, the Palo Alto Networks firewall routes its own management traffic (traffic generated by the firewall, not through it) via the Management Interface (MGT). This includes DNS queries, NTP syncs, fetching updates from Palo Alto Networks, and communicating with User-ID agents. However, in many secure environments, the MGT port is on an isolated out-of-band network that does not have Internet access. “Service Routes” allow the administrator to change this behavior, forcing specific management services to exit via a dataplane interface (e.g., Ethernet1/1) to reach the Internet or internal servers.
Why A is incorrect: Data traffic (user traffic) is routed via the Virtual Router and Security Policies. Service routes apply only to the firewall’s traffic.
Why C is incorrect: Static routes are configured in the Virtual Router. Service routes are a separate configuration under Device > Setup > Services.
Why D is incorrect: Policy Based Forwarding is for overriding the routing table for user traffic. Service routes are for the device’s traffic.
