Visit here for our full Microsoft AZ-204 exam dumps and practice test questions.
Q121
You are developing an Azure Function that needs to send millions of email notifications. The solution must be cost-effective and handle throttling from the email service. What should you implement?
A) Send emails directly from the function
B) Queue messages in Azure Storage Queue, process with function
C) Use SendGrid binding in Azure Functions
D) Implement Azure Logic App for each email
Answer: B
Explanation:
Queue messages in Azure Storage Queue and process with function provides the most cost-effective and resilient solution for high-volume email sending, decoupling message generation from delivery while naturally handling throttling through controlled processing rates.
The architecture involves one process adding email messages to a storage queue, while a queue-triggered function processes messages and sends emails. Storage queues are extremely cost-effective for millions of messages, costing fractions of a cent per million operations. The queue provides durable buffering, ensuring no messages are lost even if the email service is temporarily unavailable or rate-limiting occurs.
Queue-triggered functions automatically scale based on queue length, processing messages in parallel across multiple instances. You can control the processing rate through function host configuration, setting batch size and maximum dequeue count to respect email service rate limits. If sending fails due to throttling, the message returns to the queue for retry after the visibility timeout, providing automatic retry with exponential backoff.
This pattern provides several advantages. The queue absorbs traffic spikes, preventing system overload. Processing continues even if email service is slow or intermittently unavailable. Failed messages automatically retry without custom logic. You can implement priority queues for urgent emails while batch processing routine notifications. Monitoring queue length provides visibility into processing lag and enables proactive capacity management.
For cost optimization, use batch dequeue to process multiple messages per function invocation, reducing function execution count. Implement intelligent retry with increasing delays to avoid hammering throttled services. Use poison queue handling to isolate messages that consistently fail, preventing them from blocking other messages.
Sending directly from functions works for small volumes but lacks buffering and retry capabilities. SendGrid binding simplifies sending but doesn’t solve throttling or provide queueing. Logic Apps are expensive at scale, costing per execution, making them impractical for millions of emails.
Q122
You need to implement authentication for an Azure App Service web app. Users should authenticate with their corporate Azure AD credentials. What should you configure?
A) App Service Authentication with Azure AD identity provider
B) Custom authentication with Azure AD SDK
C) Azure AD B2C with local accounts
D) OAuth 2.0 middleware with manual configuration
Answer: A
Explanation:
App Service Authentication with Azure AD identity provider offers built-in authentication requiring no code changes, providing secure access with corporate credentials while integrating seamlessly with Azure AD security features.
App Service Authentication (also called Easy Auth) provides authentication and authorization without requiring any code in your application. When enabled, it intercepts HTTP requests before they reach your application code, authenticating users and passing identity information through HTTP headers. This eliminates the complexity of implementing OAuth flows, token validation, and session management.
Configuration involves enabling authentication in App Service settings, selecting Azure AD as the identity provider, and registering an app in Azure AD (or letting App Service do this automatically). You can configure authentication to require sign-in for all requests or allow anonymous access with optional authentication. When users access your app, they’re redirected to Azure AD for authentication, then returned to your app with an authenticated session.
The integration provides enterprise features automatically. Users benefit from single sign-on with their corporate credentials, requiring no separate registration. Administrators control access through Azure AD user and group assignments. Conditional Access policies apply, enabling requirements like multi-factor authentication, device compliance, or location restrictions. Token refresh happens automatically, maintaining sessions without user interruption.
App Service Authentication supports advanced scenarios including authorized scopes for accessing Microsoft Graph or other APIs, custom token stores, multiple authentication providers simultaneously, and integration with Azure AD B2C for customer scenarios. Identity information is available in your application through HTTP headers or platform-specific APIs, enabling personalization and authorization decisions.
Custom authentication with Azure AD SDK requires significant code to implement OAuth flows, token validation, session management, and error handling. Azure AD B2C is designed for customer scenarios, not corporate authentication. Manual OAuth middleware configuration adds complexity without providing Easy Auth’s automatic token management and integration features.
Q123
You are implementing Azure Cognitive Services for image analysis. The solution must comply with data residency requirements. What should you configure?
A) Use global Cognitive Services endpoint
B) Create Cognitive Services resource in required region
C) Use Azure CDN for data caching
D) Implement Azure Front Door with geographic routing
Answer: B
Explanation:
Creating Cognitive Services resource in the required region ensures data processing occurs within that region, meeting data residency and sovereignty requirements while providing optimal latency for regional users.
Cognitive Services resources are deployed in specific Azure regions, and all processing occurs within that region. When you create a Computer Vision, Face, or other Cognitive Services resource, you select the deployment region. Images and data sent to that resource are processed in the selected region’s data centers, ensuring compliance with regulations requiring data to remain within specific geographic boundaries.
Different regions may have different service availability and pricing. When selecting a region, verify the required Cognitive Services are available and consider proximity to users for latency optimization. The service endpoint URL includes the region, clearly indicating where processing occurs. Multi-region deployments require separate resources in each region.
Data residency is critical for compliance with regulations like GDPR in Europe, data localization laws in many countries, and industry-specific requirements in healthcare or government. Processing within specific regions ensures personal information doesn’t cross regulatory boundaries. Combined with encryption in transit and at rest, regional deployment provides comprehensive data protection.
For multi-region applications, deploy Cognitive Services resources in each required region and route requests to the appropriate regional endpoint based on user location. Azure Traffic Manager or Front Door can provide geographic routing to the nearest Cognitive Services resource, but the key is having resources deployed regionally rather than relying on global endpoints.
Global endpoints or centralized resources process data in a single region regardless of user location, violating data residency requirements. CDN caches responses but doesn’t control where processing occurs. Front Door provides routing but compliance requires regional resources. Some Cognitive Services support containers for on-premises or edge deployment when even regional Azure presence doesn’t meet requirements.
Q124
You need to implement a solution that captures all HTTP traffic to an Azure App Service for security analysis. What should you configure?
A) Application Insights with request telemetry
B) App Service diagnostic logs with HTTP logging
C) Network Security Group flow logs
D) Azure Monitor Logs with custom queries
Answer: B
Explanation:
App Service diagnostic logs with HTTP logging captures comprehensive HTTP traffic information including requests, responses, headers, and status codes, providing detailed data for security analysis and compliance auditing.
HTTP logging in App Service records every HTTP request to your application with extensive details including timestamp, client IP address, HTTP method, URL path, query strings, status code, bytes sent and received, user agent, referrer, and processing time. Logs also include request and response headers, enabling analysis of authentication tokens, cookies, and custom headers relevant to security investigations.
Configuration involves enabling diagnostic settings in App Service and selecting HTTP logs as a log category. You specify the destination – Storage Account for long-term archival, Log Analytics workspace for querying and analysis, or Event Hub for streaming to external systems. Logs are written in structured JSON format, facilitating parsing and analysis with tools like Azure Monitor, Splunk, or custom applications.
For security analysis, HTTP logs enable detection of suspicious patterns like SQL injection attempts in query strings, unusual user agents indicating automated scanning, authentication failures suggesting brute force attacks, or access to sensitive paths from unexpected locations. Combined with geolocation data, you can identify anomalous access patterns. Retention in storage accounts provides forensic data for post-incident investigation.
Query capabilities in Log Analytics enable sophisticated analysis using Kusto Query Language. You can aggregate requests by IP to find potential attackers, correlate failed authentications with subsequent successful access indicating compromised credentials, track access to sensitive resources, or identify performance issues from slow requests.
Application Insights captures telemetry but optimizes for performance monitoring rather than comprehensive security logging, and may sample data. Network Security Groups are for network-layer filtering, not application HTTP traffic. Azure Monitor Logs is the analysis platform but requires diagnostic logs as the data source.
Q125
You are implementing Azure Functions with multiple environments (dev, test, prod). Configuration must be managed separately per environment. What should you use?
A) Application settings in Azure Function configuration
B) Hard-coded configuration in function code
C) JSON configuration files deployed with code
D) Environment variables in local.settings.json only
Answer: A
Explanation:
Application settings in Azure Function configuration provide environment-specific configuration management that’s separate from code, secure, and easily managed through Azure Portal, CLI, or ARM templates without requiring code changes or redeployment.
Application settings in Azure Functions work like environment variables, accessible through configuration APIs in your code. Each Function App (representing an environment) has its own settings, enabling different connection strings, API keys, feature flags, and other configuration values per environment. Settings are stored encrypted and can reference Key Vault secrets for sensitive values.
The implementation involves defining settings in Azure Portal, ARM templates, or Azure CLI for each environment. In code, access settings through platform-specific configuration APIs (IConfiguration in .NET, process.env in Node.js). The same code reads configuration appropriate to the environment it’s running in, eliminating environment-specific code branches or build configurations.
Application settings support advanced scenarios. Deployment slots enable testing configuration changes in staging before swapping to production. Settings can be marked as slot-specific or shared across slots. Key Vault references like @Microsoft.KeyVault(SecretUri=…) enable secure access to secrets without storing them directly. Managed identities authenticate to Key Vault automatically without credentials in settings.
For local development, local.settings.json contains application settings that mirror Azure configuration structure. The file is excluded from source control, preventing accidental exposure of secrets. Developers configure their local settings for development resources while Azure environments use production resources, all using the same configuration keys in code.
Hard-coded configuration prevents environment-specific values and requires code changes for configuration updates. JSON configuration files complicate deployment and require file management across environments. local.settings.json is only for local development and isn’t deployed to Azure, so it can’t provide Azure environment configuration.
Q126
You need to implement Azure Service Bus to process messages in the exact order they are sent across multiple consumers. What should you configure?
A) Queue with FIFO guarantee
B) Queue with sessions and single consumer per session
C) Topic with multiple subscriptions
D) Queue with duplicate detection
Answer: B
Explanation:
Queue with sessions and single consumer per session provides guaranteed ordering with parallel processing capability by partitioning messages into sessions where each session is processed sequentially while different sessions are processed concurrently.
Service Bus sessions enable stateful processing with ordering guarantees. Messages with the same SessionId are grouped into a logical session and delivered in FIFO order within that session. Each session can only be processed by one consumer at a time, ensuring sequential processing. Multiple sessions can be processed in parallel by different consumers, enabling scalability while maintaining ordering where needed.
The architecture works by assigning SessionId when sending messages, typically based on an entity requiring ordered processing like user ID, order ID, or device ID. Consumers accept sessions using session-aware receive modes. The consumer locks a session, processes all messages in that session sequentially, then accepts another session. Service Bus ensures no other consumer can access messages in a locked session.
This pattern enables parallel processing without sacrificing ordering guarantees. If you have 1000 users requiring ordered message processing, messages are partitioned into 1000 sessions (one per user). Multiple consumers can process different user sessions simultaneously, providing horizontal scalability. Within each user’s session, messages are processed in exact order sent.
Session state APIs enable maintaining context across messages in a session without external state stores. This is valuable for multi-step workflows where each step is a message and the workflow state travels with the session.
Basic queues without sessions provide FIFO ordering but only with a single consumer, limiting scalability. With multiple consumers, messages are distributed arbitrarily, breaking ordering. Topics with subscriptions are for pub/sub patterns, not ordered processing. Duplicate detection prevents reprocessing identical messages but doesn’t guarantee ordering.
Q127
You are implementing Azure Key Vault for secrets management. The solution must prevent deletion of secrets even by administrators. What should you configure?
A) Azure RBAC with deny assignments
B) Soft delete and purge protection
C) Key Vault firewall with restricted access
D) Access policies with no delete permissions
Answer: B
Explanation:
Soft delete and purge protection provide the strongest deletion protection in Key Vault, ensuring secrets cannot be permanently deleted even by users with full permissions, protecting against both accidental and malicious deletion.
Soft delete enables recovery of deleted secrets, keys, and certificates within a retention period (7 to 90 days, default 90). When a secret is deleted with soft delete enabled, it enters a deleted state rather than being permanently removed. The secret remains recoverable during the retention period and can be restored or permanently purged by authorized users. This protects against accidental deletion while enabling eventual cleanup.
Purge protection enhances soft delete by preventing permanent deletion (purging) during the retention period. Even users with full Key Vault permissions cannot purge deleted items until the retention period expires. This provides a mandatory recovery window where deleted secrets can be restored, protecting against ransomware, malicious insiders, or administrative errors that might otherwise cause permanent data loss.
The combination creates a defense-in-depth approach. Soft delete allows recovery from accidental deletion. Purge protection prevents intentional or malicious permanent deletion. Together they ensure secrets remain recoverable for the retention period regardless of who performs the deletion or their motivation.
Configuration involves enabling both features when creating the Key Vault or updating existing vaults. Once purge protection is enabled, it cannot be disabled, ensuring the protection remains in place. Compliance requirements often mandate purge protection for production environments handling sensitive data.
Azure RBAC deny assignments can restrict deletion permissions but can be modified by users with sufficient Azure permissions. Access policies with no delete permissions can be changed by Key Vault administrators. Firewall restricts network access but doesn’t prevent deletion by authorized users. Only purge protection provides irrevocable deletion protection during the retention period.
Q128
You need to implement Azure Cosmos DB with minimal latency for a globally distributed application. Users should always read their own writes immediately. What consistency level should you choose?
A) Strong consistency
B) Bounded staleness consistency
C) Session consistency
D) Eventual consistency
Answer: C
Explanation:
Session consistency provides read-your-own-writes guarantees within a session with low latency, ensuring users immediately see their own changes while providing better performance than stronger consistency models.
Session consistency guarantees that within a single client session, reads always see the effects of previous writes from that session. This is called monotonic reads and read-your-own-writes consistency. If a user creates a document, subsequent reads by that user in the same session will see the document. However, other users might not see the change immediately depending on replication lag.
The mechanism uses session tokens. When a write occurs, Cosmos DB returns a session token representing the logical timestamp of that write. The client SDK automatically captures this token and includes it with subsequent read requests from that session. Cosmos DB ensures reads return data at least as recent as the session token, guaranteeing the user sees their own writes.
Session consistency provides optimal balance for most applications. It satisfies the common requirement that users see their own changes immediately while avoiding the latency and availability costs of strong consistency. Reads can be served from any replica without waiting for global replication, providing low latency. Only the client’s own writes need to be reflected, not all global writes.
The consistency applies per session, typically per application instance or user session. Different sessions may see different versions of data during replication lag, but each session has a consistent view progressing forward in time. This matches user expectations – they expect to see their own changes but understand other users might not see changes immediately.
Strong consistency ensures all users see all writes immediately but introduces significant latency and impacts availability. Bounded staleness and eventual consistency don’t guarantee read-your-own-writes, potentially showing users stale data immediately after they make changes, creating confusing experiences.
Q129
You are implementing Azure App Service deployment slots. You need to test new code in production environment before making it available to users. What should you do?
A) Deploy to staging slot and swap immediately
B) Deploy to staging slot, test with slot URL, then swap
C) Deploy to staging slot, route 10% traffic, then swap
D) Deploy directly to production slot with maintenance mode
Answer: B
Explanation:
Deploy to staging slot, test with slot URL, then swap provides the safest deployment process by enabling comprehensive testing in the production environment with production configuration before exposing new code to users.
Deployment slots are live App Service instances running in the same App Service Plan as production. Each slot has its own hostname, enabling direct access for testing. The staging slot receives the new deployment and can be tested thoroughly using its URL before swapping with production. This validates the code works with production configuration, databases, and dependencies without affecting users.
Testing in staging with production configuration is critical. The staging slot uses production connection strings, API keys, and application settings (unless marked slot-specific), ensuring the code is tested with the exact configuration it will use in production. This catches configuration-related issues before they impact users. You can run automated tests, manual validation, smoke tests, and performance tests against the staging slot.
The swap operation is near-instantaneous, typically completing in seconds. App Service warms up the staging slot instances with production configuration before swapping, ensuring the application is ready to serve traffic immediately. If issues are discovered after swap, swapping back (rollback) is equally fast, minimizing user impact. Swap history is tracked, providing audit trails.
Swapping immediately without testing defeats the purpose of deployment slots. Testing should verify the application works correctly with production environment before exposing to users. Routing percentage of traffic is useful for gradual rollout but should follow initial validation. Deploying directly to production without slots eliminates the safety net of quick rollback and production-configuration testing.
Deployment slots also enable testing configuration changes safely, performing blue-green database migrations, and implementing continuous deployment workflows with automatic swap after validation.
Q130
You need to implement Azure Functions that process messages from multiple Service Bus queues with different message types. What pattern should you use?
A) Single function with multiple queue triggers
B) Separate function for each queue
C) Single function with dynamic queue binding
D) Logic App to consolidate queues
Answer: B
Explanation:
Separate function for each queue provides the cleanest architecture with isolated processing logic, independent scaling, and easier maintenance when handling different message types with potentially different processing requirements.
Each function focuses on a single message type with its own processing logic, making the code simpler and more maintainable. Functions can be developed, tested, and deployed independently without affecting other message types. This separation aligns with single responsibility principle and makes the codebase easier to understand and modify.
Independent scaling is a key advantage. Different message types may have different processing patterns – some may be high volume requiring many instances, others low volume needing minimal resources. With separate functions, each scales independently based on its queue length and processing requirements. The host can allocate appropriate resources to each function without overprovisioning or underprovisioning.
Error handling and monitoring become clearer with separate functions. Failed messages go to their specific function’s poison queue, enabling targeted investigation and remediation. Application Insights telemetry is segmented by function, making it easy to analyze performance, errors, and costs per message type. Alerts can be configured specifically for critical message types.
Deployment and versioning are simplified. You can deploy updates to one function without risking others. If a message type’s processing logic changes significantly, only that function is affected. This reduces deployment risk and enables faster iteration.
Single function with multiple triggers is syntactically invalid – each function can have only one trigger. Dynamic queue binding complicates code with conditional logic for different message types. Logic Apps add complexity and cost for simple message routing. While these alternatives might work, separate functions provide the cleanest architecture matching each message type’s specific needs.
Q131
You are implementing Azure Blob Storage for a photo-sharing application. Users should upload directly to storage without going through your web servers. What should you implement?
A) Shared Access Signatures with write permissions
B) Storage account keys in client application
C) Azure Active Directory authentication
D) Anonymous public write access
Answer: A
Explanation:
Shared Access Signatures (SAS) with write permissions enable secure, time-limited, direct client uploads to Blob Storage without exposing storage account keys or routing data through web servers, optimizing performance and reducing server costs.
SAS tokens are query string parameters providing delegated access to storage resources with granular permissions and time constraints. For direct upload scenarios, your server generates a SAS token with write permissions for a specific container or blob, limited validity period (e.g., 15 minutes), and optional constraints like allowed IP addresses or protocols. The client receives this token and uses it to upload directly to storage.
The architecture eliminates the need for files to transit through web servers, reducing bandwidth costs, server load, and upload times. Users upload directly to Azure’s storage infrastructure, leveraging its global distribution and high bandwidth. Your servers only handle SAS token generation and potentially metadata storage, both lightweight operations.
Security is maintained through multiple layers. SAS tokens have expiration times, limiting the window of potential misuse. Permissions are scoped to specific operations (write only, preventing unauthorized reads or deletions) and resources (specific containers or blob prefixes). Tokens can include content restrictions like maximum file size or allowed content types. Once expired, tokens are useless, requiring users to request new tokens for additional uploads.
The implementation involves generating SAS tokens server-side using storage account credentials or user delegation keys (more secure, requires Azure AD). User delegation SAS uses Azure AD credentials rather than account keys, enabling per-user token generation with audit trails. Your client application receives the token and constructs upload URLs including the SAS query string.
Storage account keys provide unlimited access and should never be in client applications. Azure AD authentication requires configuration in client applications and doesn’t simplify direct uploads. Anonymous public write access allows anyone to upload, creating security and abuse risks.
Q132
You need to implement Azure Event Hubs for ingesting time-series telemetry data. The solution must retain data for 7 days for batch processing. What should you configure?
A) Event Hubs with standard tier and 1-day retention
B) Event Hubs with standard tier and Event Hubs Capture
C) Event Hubs with premium tier and 90-day retention
D) Event Hubs with basic tier and consumer groups
Answer: B
Explanation:
Event Hubs with standard tier and Event Hubs Capture provides cost-effective 7-day data retention by automatically archiving events to Azure Storage or Data Lake Storage, enabling batch processing without requiring premium tier’s extended in-stream retention.
Event Hubs Capture automatically archives event data to blob storage or Data Lake in Avro format at configurable intervals (time or size-based). This enables long-term retention without consuming Event Hubs retention capacity. Captured data can be processed by batch analytics tools like Azure Databricks, HDInsight, or Synapse Analytics, supporting scenarios requiring historical data analysis.
Standard tier Event Hubs provides up to 7 days of in-stream retention, allowing stream processors to rewind and reprocess events. However, for batch processing that doesn’t require immediate access, Capture is more cost-effective than premium tier’s extended retention. Captured files are organized by partition and timestamp, facilitating efficient batch processing and time-range queries.
The configuration involves enabling Capture when creating the Event Hub, specifying the destination storage account or Data Lake, and setting capture interval (minimum 60 seconds or 10MB). Captured data is immutable and organized in a folder structure like namespace/eventhub/partition/year/month/day/hour/minute. This structure enables time-based processing and retention management.
Capture integrates with batch processing workflows. Azure Data Factory can orchestrate regular jobs processing captured files. Spark applications can read Avro files directly. Azure Synapse Analytics can query captured data using external tables. The combination of real-time stream processing and batch processing on captured data enables lambda architecture patterns.
Standard tier with only 1-day retention is insufficient for 7-day batch processing requirements. Premium tier provides 90-day in-stream retention but costs significantly more than standard tier with Capture. Basic tier doesn’t support Capture or extended retention. Consumer groups enable multiple applications to read the same event stream but don’t affect retention.
Q133
You are implementing Azure API Management with rate limiting. Different client applications should have different rate limits. What should you configure?
A) rate-limit policy with fixed limits for all clients
B) rate-limit-by-key policy using subscription ID
C) quota policy with time-based limits
D) IP filtering with throttling rules
Answer: B
Explanation:
rate-limit-by-key policy using subscription ID enables per-client rate limiting by tracking request counts separately for each API subscription, providing flexible control over different client application limits.
API Management subscriptions represent client applications accessing your APIs. Each subscription has a unique subscription key that clients include in requests. The rate-limit-by-key policy uses the subscription ID as the key for tracking rate limits, enabling different limits for different clients. You can create subscription tiers (Bronze, Silver, Gold) with different rate limits configured at the product level.
The policy configuration specifies calls (number of requests), renewal-period (time window in seconds), and counter-key expression. Using @(context.Subscription.Id) as the counter key tracks limits per subscription. You can configure different policies for different products or APIs, and set subscription-specific overrides when more granular control is needed.
This architecture provides business flexibility. Premium customers with Gold subscriptions get higher limits than free-tier users. Internal applications can have unlimited access while external partners are rate-limited. Trial accounts receive limited requests to prevent abuse while encouraging upgrade to paid tiers. Rate limits can be changed without code changes, enabling operational flexibility based on business requirements or capacity planning.
The policy returns HTTP 429 Too Many Requests when limits are exceeded, with Retry-After headers indicating when the client can retry. This enables client applications to implement backoff strategies. API Management tracks limits in memory with high performance, introducing minimal latency overhead. Counters reset automatically at the end of each renewal period.
Fixed rate-limit policies apply the same limit to all clients, preventing differentiation between premium and free tiers. Quota policies track cumulative usage over longer periods rather than request rates. IP filtering doesn’t identify client applications since multiple clients might share IP addresses or clients might have dynamic IPs. Only subscription-based tracking provides reliable per-client identification.
Q134
You need to implement Azure Cosmos DB with automatic failover to secondary regions during outages. What should you configure?
A) Single-region account with zone redundancy
B) Multi-region account with service-managed failover
C) Multi-region account with manual failover only
D) Multi-region account with multiple write regions
Answer: B
Explanation:
Multi-region account with service-managed failover provides automatic availability during regional outages by automatically promoting a secondary region to primary when the primary region becomes unavailable, ensuring continuous application availability without manual intervention.
Service-managed failover uses health probes to detect when the primary write region is unavailable. When an outage is detected, Cosmos DB automatically initiates failover to the highest-priority secondary region. The failover process promotes the secondary to primary, redirecting write operations to the new primary region. When the original region recovers, it becomes a secondary region.
The configuration involves enabling multi-region replication by adding one or more secondary regions to your Cosmos DB account and enabling automatic failover. You define failover priority for secondary regions, determining the order in which regions are promoted during failures. Failover typically completes within minutes, with applications automatically reconnected through the SDK’s built-in retry and region discovery mechanisms.
Applications use the Cosmos DB SDK with multi-region support, configuring preferred regions for read operations. The SDK automatically handles failover by detecting connectivity issues and retrying against available regions. Write operations are automatically redirected to the current write region. This provides transparent failover from the application perspective with minimal code changes.
Service-managed failover is appropriate for most availability scenarios, providing automatic recovery without operations team intervention during outages or maintenance windows. It balances availability with consistency guarantees based on your configured consistency level. For strong consistency, failover waits for in-flight writes to complete, ensuring no data loss.
Single-region accounts lack failover capability. Zone redundancy within a region protects against datacenter failures but not regional outages. Manual failover requires operations team involvement, introducing response time delays. Multi-write regions provide the highest availability but with added complexity and cost, appropriate when even failover time is unacceptable.
Q135
You are implementing Azure Functions with Event Grid trigger. The function must acknowledge event receipt immediately and process asynchronously. What pattern should you implement?
A) Synchronous processing within the function
B) Queue output binding with separate queue processor
C) Durable Functions with orchestration
D) Return HTTP 200 and continue processing
Answer: B
Explanation:
Queue output binding with separate queue processor provides the optimal pattern for decoupling event acknowledgment from processing, ensuring Event Grid receives quick confirmation while enabling reliable asynchronous processing with automatic retry and scale.
The pattern involves an Event Grid triggered function that validates the event, writes it to a queue using output binding, and returns immediately. Event Grid considers the event delivered successfully when the function returns, typically within milliseconds. A separate queue-triggered function performs the actual processing, which may take longer and requires different retry or scaling characteristics.
This architecture provides several benefits. Event Grid doesn’t timeout waiting for long-running processing. The queue provides durable buffering if processing systems are temporarily unavailable. Queue-triggered functions scale independently based on queue depth, allowing high event rates without overwhelming processing capacity. Failed processing retries automatically without duplicating events in Event Grid.
The implementation uses output bindings declaratively without code for queue operations. The Event Grid function receives the event, performs lightweight validation, and returns an object that the output binding writes to the queue. The queue function retrieves messages and performs resource-intensive processing with appropriate timeout and retry configuration.
This pattern enables different scaling characteristics for receiving versus processing. Event Grid functions scale to handle burst event volumes, while queue processors scale based on processing capacity and queue length. You can implement priority queues, batch processing, or specialized processing logic without affecting event acknowledgment.
Synchronous processing within the function risks Event Grid timeouts on long operations. Durable Functions work but add complexity for simple asynchronous processing. Returning HTTP 200 and continuing processing appears to work but violates function execution contracts and can result in incomplete processing if the function times out or the host recycles.
Q136
You need to implement Azure Blob Storage with access control that prevents unauthorized access even if connection strings are compromised. What should you use?
A) Shared Key authorization
B) Shared Access Signatures
C) Azure Active Directory authentication with RBAC
D) Account SAS with stored access policies
Answer: C
Explanation:
Azure Active Directory authentication with RBAC provides the most secure access control by eliminating shared secrets entirely, using identity-based authentication with fine-grained permissions that can be audited and instantly revoked without changing connection strings.
Azure AD integration for Blob Storage enables applications and users to authenticate using their Azure AD identity rather than shared keys or SAS tokens. Applications use managed identities or service principals, while users authenticate with their organizational credentials. Access is controlled through Azure RBAC roles like Storage Blob Data Contributor or Reader, assigned at subscription, resource group, storage account, or container level.
The security advantages are substantial. There are no shared secrets that can be stolen or leaked. Compromising one identity doesn’t grant access to storage since each identity has specific role assignments. All access attempts are logged in Azure AD sign-in logs with complete audit trails. Access can be revoked instantly by removing role assignments or disabling identities without changing any configuration or rotating keys.
Integration with applications is seamless using Azure SDKs. The BlobServiceClient accepts TokenCredential instead of connection strings. For managed identities, DefaultAzureCredential handles authentication automatically. The SDK manages token acquisition, caching, and renewal transparently. Code is cleaner without connection string management and works consistently across environments.
Azure AD authentication supports conditional access policies, enabling additional security requirements like multi-factor authentication for sensitive operations, location-based restrictions, or device compliance checks. This provides defense-in-depth with multiple security layers beyond basic authentication.
Shared Key authorization and SAS tokens are shared secrets that grant broad access if compromised. Rotating them requires updating all applications. Stored access policies enable SAS revocation but SAS tokens themselves remain vulnerable to interception. Only Azure AD eliminates shared secrets while providing comprehensive audit and control capabilities.
Q137
You are implementing Azure Service Bus with dead-letter queues. You need to reprocess dead-lettered messages after fixing the processing issue. What should you do?
A) Move messages manually using Service Bus Explorer
B) Create a function to read from dead-letter queue and send to main queue
C) Configure auto-forwarding from dead-letter to main queue
D) Delete dead-letter messages and replay from source
Answer: B
Explanation:
Create a function to read from dead-letter queue and send to main queue provides a programmatic, repeatable solution for reprocessing dead-lettered messages with control over which messages to replay and proper error handling.
Dead-letter queues are sub-queues that hold messages that failed processing after maximum delivery attempts. Messages move to the dead-letter queue automatically when they exceed MaxDeliveryCount or are explicitly dead-lettered by application code. The dead-letter queue preserves all message properties and metadata, including the original enqueue time and why the message was dead-lettered.
The reprocessing function connects to the dead-letter queue (accessed via the queue path suffixed with /$DeadLetterQueue), reads messages, optionally filters which messages to reprocess based on properties or dead-letter reason, and sends them back to the main queue. You can modify message properties or content before resubmission if the original issue was due to malformed data.
This approach provides flexibility and control. You can reprocess all dead-lettered messages or selectively replay specific messages. Messages can be inspected and modified before reprocessing. The function can implement retry policies, logging, and notifications. Reprocessing can be triggered on-demand rather than automatically, ensuring issues are fixed before replay.
Implementation considerations include handling message dequeue from dead-letter queue and enqueue to main queue as idempotent operations. Messages should be completed from dead-letter queue only after successful enqueue to main queue to prevent message loss. Monitoring should track reprocessing success rates and identify recurring failures requiring deeper investigation.
Manual movement using Service Bus Explorer works for small volumes but isn’t automated or repeatable. Auto-forwarding from dead-letter queues isn’t supported in Service Bus. Deleting and replaying from source assumes messages are available at source, which often isn’t true since dead-lettering indicates terminal processing failure, not source availability issues.
Q138
You need to implement Azure Functions that access Azure SQL Database with highest security. What authentication method should you use?
A) SQL Server authentication with username and password
B) Connection string with password stored in app settings
C) Managed identity with Azure AD authentication
D) Certificate-based authentication
Answer: C
Explanation:
Managed identity with Azure AD authentication eliminates credentials in connection strings while providing auditable, revocable access control through Azure AD, representing the most secure authentication method for Azure services.
Azure SQL Database supports Azure AD authentication, enabling applications to authenticate using managed identities instead of SQL credentials. When you enable managed identity for your Azure Function and grant it database permissions, the function authenticates to SQL Database using its Azure AD identity. No credentials are stored in configuration or code.
The implementation involves enabling managed identity on your Function App, creating a database user mapped to that identity, and granting appropriate database permissions. The connection string uses Authentication=Active Directory Managed Identity instead of username and password. Azure SDK SqlConnection handles token acquisition automatically, refreshing tokens before expiration.
Security benefits include elimination of credential storage, reducing attack surface since there are no passwords to steal or leak. Access control through Azure AD integrates with organizational identity management. All authentication attempts appear in Azure AD logs with details about which identity accessed which database and when. Access can be revoked instantly by removing database permissions or disabling the identity.
The approach supports principle of least privilege by granting only necessary database permissions to the function’s identity. Different functions can have different identities with appropriate permissions. Testing environments use separate identities with limited access to test databases.
Azure AD authentication also enables conditional access policies, requiring specific security conditions before allowing database connections. This adds defense-in-depth beyond simple authentication.
SQL authentication with passwords requires storing secrets, even in Key Vault requires credential management. Connection strings with passwords in app settings expose credentials to anyone with access to function configuration. Certificate-based authentication requires certificate management and isn’t natively supported by Azure SQL Database for client authentication.
Q139
You are implementing Azure Application Gateway as a reverse proxy for web applications. You need to implement Web Application Firewall protection. What should you configure?
A) Application Gateway v1 with custom rules
B) Application Gateway v2 with WAF SKU
C) Network Security Groups with deny rules
D) Azure Firewall with application rules
Answer: B
Explanation:
Application Gateway v2 with WAF SKU provides integrated Web Application Firewall capabilities specifically designed for protecting web applications from common exploits and vulnerabilities while maintaining the reverse proxy and load balancing functionality.
WAF on Application Gateway operates at Layer 7 (application layer), inspecting HTTP/HTTPS traffic for malicious patterns before forwarding to backend servers. It protects against OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities including SQL injection, cross-site scripting, protocol violations, and other web attacks. WAF uses rule sets (managed or custom) to identify and block malicious requests.
The integration with Application Gateway v2 provides comprehensive web application protection in a single service. Application Gateway handles SSL/TLS termination, URL-based routing, session affinity, and load balancing, while WAF provides security inspection. This eliminates the need for separate security appliances, reducing complexity and cost.
WAF offers multiple modes: detection mode logs threats without blocking, useful for tuning, and prevention mode actively blocks detected threats. Managed rule sets maintained by Microsoft are updated regularly for new threats. Custom rules enable application-specific protection for business logic attacks or whitelisting trusted IP ranges.
Configuration involves selecting WAF SKU when creating Application Gateway and enabling WAF policies with desired rule sets. Policies can be applied at gateway level or per-listener, enabling different security postures for different applications. WAF logs integrate with Azure Monitor, Log Analytics, and Security Center for centralized security monitoring and alerting.
Application Gateway v1 doesn’t support WAF in the same integrated manner. Network Security Groups operate at network layer, lacking application-level awareness to detect web attacks. Azure Firewall is designed for network-level traffic filtering, not web application security. Only Application Gateway v2 WAF provides the specific protections web applications require.
Q140
You need to implement Azure Cosmos DB queries that return paginated results with continuation tokens. What SDK feature should you use?
A) FeedOptions with MaxItemCount and continuation token
B) ReadAll method with page size parameter
C) Skip and Take LINQ operators
D) Manual pagination with offset queries
Answer: A
Explanation:
FeedOptions with MaxItemCount and continuation token provides efficient pagination through Cosmos DB results using native SDK support that handles request units efficiently and maintains query state across page requests.
Cosmos DB queries return results in pages due to request size limits and RU (Request Unit) constraints. The SDK provides continuation tokens representing the position in the result set after each page. Clients receive the first page of results along with a continuation token, which they include in subsequent requests to retrieve following pages.
FeedOptions enables configuring query behavior including MaxItemCount (maximum items per page), continuation token from previous query, and other parameters. The pattern involves creating a query, setting MaxItemCount in FeedOptions, executing the query to get the first page, checking for continuation token in response, and repeating with the token until no token is returned.
This approach provides efficient resource utilization. Cosmos DB processes only the requested page size per request, consuming proportional RUs. Continuation tokens maintain sort order and filtering state without requiring query re-execution. The pattern works correctly with any query complexity, including joins and filters.
Continuation tokens are opaque strings representing internal state – clients should treat them as black boxes, not parsing or modifying them. Tokens have expiration, typically a few minutes, encouraging clients to complete pagination promptly. Tokens are query-specific and cannot be used with different queries.
Implementation supports various pagination UX patterns – infinite scroll, numbered pages, or next/previous navigation. The server-side paging ensures consistent performance regardless of result set size.
ReadAll methods don’t exist in Cosmos DB SDK. Skip and Take operators require reading and discarding skipped items, consuming RUs unnecessarily and performing poorly with large offsets. Manual offset queries don’t provide continuation tokens and can miss results if data changes between requests.
