Access Control Lists (ACLs) are pivotal in managing network security. They offer a structured way to control the flow of data across a network, ensuring that only legitimate traffic is allowed while potential threats are thwarted. ACLs are essentially a set of rules that determine whether to allow or block traffic based on specific criteria like IP addresses, ports, and protocols. By configuring these lists on network devices, administrators can safeguard systems and data from unauthorized access.
What is an Access Control List?
At its core, an ACL is a list of conditions applied to network traffic. This list can be configured on network devices such as routers or firewalls. ACLs help in enforcing specific rules on which packets of data are allowed to pass through the network and which ones should be denied. Each rule within an ACL can target specific parameters of a network packet, including source and destination IP addresses, source and destination ports, and even the type of protocol used.
The decision to allow or block traffic is based on whether it matches the defined rules in the ACL. This functionality is crucial for securing networks, as it allows administrators to precisely control access to network resources. The need for network security is ever-growing, and ACLs are one of the primary tools in achieving effective defense mechanisms.
The Working Mechanism of ACLs
The primary function of an ACL is to evaluate incoming and outgoing network traffic based on pre-configured rules. These rules are ordered from top to bottom, and the first match will determine whether the packet is allowed or denied. A network device will check each packet against the ACL rules, following a logical sequence of steps to determine its fate.
- Packet Inspection: As packets enter the network, they are inspected to see if they match any rule within the ACL. This inspection covers multiple parameters such as the source IP, destination IP, port number, and even the protocol used.
- Rule Evaluation: The ACL evaluates packets in a top-down manner. The first rule that matches the packet’s characteristics dictates the action. If a packet matches a rule that allows it, the packet continues to its destination; if it matches a rule that denies it, the packet is discarded.
- Default Action: If a packet doesn’t match any defined rules in the ACL, the default action is typically to deny the packet. This ensures that any traffic not explicitly allowed is blocked, adding a layer of security to the network.
This process of evaluating traffic helps ensure that only the data meant for specific destinations or devices can traverse the network. By filtering out unwanted or potentially harmful traffic, ACLs significantly enhance network security.
The Two Types of ACLs
ACLs can be divided into two main types: standard and extended. Each type serves a specific purpose depending on the level of control required over network traffic. Understanding these types is crucial for setting up an ACL that meets the unique security needs of an organization.
- Standard ACLs: These are the simplest form of ACLs, providing basic functionality. A standard ACL allows network administrators to filter traffic solely based on the source IP address. While standard ACLs are easy to configure, they lack the flexibility to control traffic with finer granularity.
- Extended ACLs: These provide a more detailed filtering mechanism. With extended ACLs, administrators can control traffic based on source and destination IP addresses, ports, and even protocols like TCP or UDP. This greater flexibility allows for more precise control over network traffic, enabling complex security configurations.
Both types of ACLs play essential roles in protecting networks, but the choice of which to use depends on the level of control required for specific network conditions.
ACL Configuration and Practical Uses
The configuration of ACLs is not limited to simply creating a list of rules. It also involves defining the exact actions to be taken when traffic matches specific conditions. In practical terms, ACLs can be configured to accomplish several critical tasks, such as restricting access, prioritizing traffic, and blocking specific services.
- Restricting Access: ACLs can be used to block unauthorized access to sensitive resources. By denying traffic from untrusted IP addresses, administrators can ensure that only devices with valid credentials can connect to the network. This is an essential measure in preventing external threats such as hacking attempts or unauthorized data access.
- Traffic Prioritization: In networks with limited bandwidth, ACLs can help prioritize traffic. For example, ACL rules can ensure that mission-critical data, such as VoIP calls or streaming services, is given higher priority over less important traffic like file downloads. This helps in maintaining the quality of service and ensures that essential communication is not interrupted.
- Blocking Unwanted Services: Some services, such as peer-to-peer file sharing or certain social media platforms, may consume unnecessary bandwidth or even pose a security risk. ACLs can be configured to block access to these services, enhancing both the security and efficiency of the network.
By tailoring ACL configurations to the unique requirements of a network, administrators can not only secure sensitive data but also optimize network performance.
The Importance of ACLs in Modern Networking
In today’s interconnected world, network security is of paramount importance. Data breaches, cyberattacks, and unauthorized access are constant threats to organizational infrastructure. ACLs serve as a primary line of defense against these threats, enabling organizations to filter out harmful traffic while allowing legitimate communications.
The increasing complexity of network environments, with multiple devices, applications, and users, makes ACLs even more crucial. They provide a scalable solution to manage access control across different segments of the network, helping to ensure that only authorized users and devices can interact with specific systems.
Moreover, ACLs are not limited to traditional networks. They are also vital in securing cloud environments, where different entities and users interact with shared resources. Whether on-premise or in the cloud, ACLs remain a cornerstone of network security.
Access Control Lists play an integral role in network security by helping administrators control traffic and protect sensitive data. From restricting unauthorized access to prioritizing critical traffic, ACLs provide a flexible and powerful tool for managing network traffic and enhancing security. The two primary types of ACLs—standard and extended—offer different levels of control, allowing administrators to choose the configuration that best suits their network’s needs.
Advanced Configurations and Implementation of Access Control Lists
As networks continue to grow in complexity and scale, the importance of effective traffic management and security cannot be overstated. Access Control Lists (ACLs) provide a robust mechanism for managing network access, ensuring that only legitimate traffic reaches critical resources. In this part of the article series, we will explore the advanced configurations and implementation techniques of ACLs. This section will build upon the foundational knowledge from Part 1 and dive deeper into the practical aspects of deploying ACLs within complex network environments.
Understanding ACL Syntax and Configuration
The configuration of ACLs can seem daunting at first due to the variety of rules and conditions that need to be defined. However, understanding the syntax and how each part of the configuration affects network traffic can make the process more intuitive. The basic ACL syntax involves defining a set of rules, each specifying conditions such as IP addresses, ports, and protocols, followed by the action to be taken (allow or deny).
For instance, a simple ACL rule might look like this:
pgsql
CopyEdit
access-list 100 permit ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 any
This rule allows all IP traffic from the 192.168.1.0 subnet to any destination. The “permit” action allows traffic, while the “deny” action would block it.
Each ACL configuration begins with the creation of an access list number or name, followed by specific rules. These rules are applied in a top-down manner, meaning the first rule that matches a packet will dictate its action, whether it is permitted or denied. This order is crucial, as it determines the behavior of incoming and outgoing packets. Administrators must carefully consider the order of rules to avoid unintended network disruptions.
Creating and Applying Extended ACLs
While standard ACLs are effective for basic filtering based on source IP addresses, extended ACLs offer far more granular control over network traffic. Extended ACLs allow administrators to filter traffic based not only on source IP but also on destination IP, protocols, and even specific ports. This advanced capability makes extended ACLs ideal for complex networks where more detailed control is required.
For example, an extended ACL can be configured to allow HTTP traffic from a specific source IP address while blocking all other types of traffic:
pgsql
CopyEdit
access-list 101 permit tcp host 192.168.1.10 any eq www
access-list 101 deny ip any any
This set of rules allows TCP traffic from the host 192.168.1.10 to any destination on port 80 (HTTP), while denying all other IP traffic. By incorporating protocols like TCP, UDP, and ICMP into the configuration, extended ACLs provide a flexible and powerful way to secure network communications.
Applying ACLs to Specific Interfaces
Once ACLs are created, they need to be applied to network interfaces for them to take effect. The process of applying ACLs to interfaces can vary depending on the device and the specific requirements of the network. Typically, ACLs can be applied to both inbound and outbound traffic on network interfaces, which allows for fine-grained control over data flow.
- Inbound ACLs: When an ACL is applied to inbound traffic, the rules are checked as the traffic enters an interface. This means that traffic will be evaluated before it is forwarded to the rest of the network. Inbound ACLs are often used to filter traffic before it reaches a critical server or network segment.
- Outbound ACLs: Conversely, outbound ACLs filter traffic after it has already passed through the network device. This type of ACL is useful for controlling the flow of traffic that is leaving a network or subnetwork, ensuring that only permitted data leaves the network.
For example, to apply an ACL to an interface on a router, an administrator might use the following command:
kotlin
CopyEdit
interface GigabitEthernet0/1
IP access-group 101 in
This command applies ACL 101 to inbound traffic on the GigabitEthernet0/1 interface. The rules defined in the ACL will now be used to filter traffic coming into the interface.
Troubleshooting ACLs
Even with carefully planned and executed ACL configurations, issues can arise that impact network performance or security. Troubleshooting ACLs can be challenging due to the complexity of rules and the potential for unintended consequences. However, there are several strategies that network administrators can employ to troubleshoot and resolve ACL-related issues.
- Verify ACL Configuration: The first step in troubleshooting is to verify that the ACL is configured correctly. This involves checking the rule set to ensure that it is aligned with the intended security policy. Administrators should also confirm that the ACL is applied to the correct interface and in the right direction (inbound or outbound).
- Use Debugging Commands: Many network devices support debugging commands that can be used to monitor ACL processing in real-time. These commands allow administrators to see which rules are being matched and whether traffic is being allowed or denied. For example, Cisco devices offer the debug ip access-list command, which provides detailed output about ACL processing.
- Test with Specific Traffic: To confirm that an ACL is functioning as expected, administrators can test it by generating specific traffic that matches the conditions of the ACL rules. By using tools like ping or traceroute, network administrators can confirm that traffic is being correctly filtered based on the ACL configuration.
- Check for Implicit Deny: One common issue with ACLs is the “implicit deny” rule. This rule is automatically applied to every ACL, meaning that if no match is found for a packet, the traffic is denied by default. Administrators should be mindful of this implicit deny rule and ensure that it doesn’t block legitimate traffic.
Best Practices for ACL Configuration
While ACLs are powerful tools for network security, their effectiveness largely depends on how they are configured. By following best practices, administrators can ensure that their ACLs provide robust security while minimizing the risk of network disruptions.
- Plan Before Implementing: Before configuring ACLs, network administrators should take the time to thoroughly plan their security strategy. This includes understanding the types of traffic that need to be allowed or denied, as well as the devices and services that require protection. A well-thought-out plan will help prevent misconfigurations and ensure that ACLs are aligned with organizational goals.
- Use Descriptive Names: When creating ACLs, it is important to use descriptive names or numbers. This makes it easier to manage and troubleshoot ACLs in the future. For example, naming an ACL “web-filtering” or “access-restriction” provides clarity about its intended purpose.
- Limit Rule Complexity: While extended ACLs offer greater flexibility, overly complex rules can lead to errors or performance degradation. Administrators should aim to keep ACL configurations as simple as possible while still meeting the security needs of the network.
- Document ACL Configurations: Documentation is key to maintaining an organized and secure network. Administrators should document all ACLs, including their rules, purpose, and the interfaces to which they are applied. This documentation will be invaluable for troubleshooting and auditing purposes.
- Regularly Review and Update ACLs: Network environments are constantly evolving, and so too should ACLs. Administrators should periodically review and update their ACL configurations to ensure that they reflect changes in the network, such as the addition of new devices or services. Regular audits can help identify potential security gaps or areas for improvement.
We have delved into the advanced configurations and implementation techniques of ACLs. From understanding the basic syntax to applying ACLs to specific interfaces, these powerful tools provide granular control over network traffic. By using extended ACLs and applying them strategically, network administrators can create a secure environment where only authorized traffic is allowed to pass through. Furthermore, troubleshooting and best practices for ACL configuration ensure that ACLs remain effective and aligned with organizational security policies.
Real-World Applications of Access Control Lists in Network Security
As networks continue to evolve, securing the flow of data and limiting unauthorized access remain top priorities. Access Control Lists (ACLs) play a critical role in shaping the security posture of network environments, offering granular control over data traffic. In this part of the article series, we will explore the real-world applications of ACLs and how they are deployed in various network environments. By understanding the practical implementation of ACLs, administrators can design more secure and efficient networks while ensuring that resources are protected from unauthorized access.
ACLs in Corporate Networks
In corporate networks, ACLs are often used as a foundational element in security policy enforcement. With a large number of employees and diverse network resources, ensuring proper traffic management is crucial for maintaining security. ACLs can be employed to restrict access to sensitive resources, such as servers containing proprietary data, or to control which devices can communicate with each other.
For example, a corporate network might have multiple segments, each with different security requirements. The finance department’s network segment, for instance, may contain sensitive financial data that must only be accessed by authorized personnel. Using ACLs, administrators can enforce policies such as:
- Allowing only specific IP addresses or ranges to access the finance segment
- Denying access to all other devices from external sources
- Restricting access to internal resources based on protocol types, such as limiting database access to SQL traffic only
By applying ACLs to routers and firewalls, network administrators can create a barrier that restricts access to critical resources, preventing unauthorized devices from gaining access to sensitive data. This helps maintain the confidentiality and integrity of corporate information, while ensuring that users can access the resources they need.
ACLs for Traffic Prioritization
Access Control Lists can also be leveraged for traffic prioritization within a network, particularly in environments where bandwidth management is essential. For instance, in large organizations that rely on Voice over IP (VoIP) or video conferencing, ensuring high-quality communication is paramount. Network congestion can lead to poor-quality calls or video streams, affecting productivity and communication. ACLs can be configured to prioritize these types of traffic by allowing specific data packets to pass through the network first.
The concept of Quality of Service (QoS) is often integrated with ACLs to manage traffic prioritization. QoS settings enable the network to classify and prioritize traffic based on factors like application type, user priority, and session importance. By configuring ACLs to match specific traffic types, such as VoIP calls or streaming video, network administrators can ensure that these packets are given higher priority over non-essential traffic, like file transfers or email.
For example, an administrator might configure an ACL to prioritize all UDP packets associated with VoIP traffic, ensuring they receive faster routing than regular HTTP traffic. This helps maintain the performance of real-time communication applications, even in congested network conditions.
Implementing ACLs for Secure Remote Access
Remote access is an essential part of modern enterprise networks, allowing employees to connect to internal resources from external locations. However, allowing remote connections also opens the door to potential security risks. To mitigate these risks, organizations can use ACLs to enforce strict policies on who can access the network remotely, what resources they can access, and under what conditions.
For instance, a company that offers remote access via a Virtual Private Network (VPN) can use ACLs to restrict VPN access based on the source IP address. ACLs can be configured to permit VPN connections only from specific trusted networks, such as the company’s corporate office or an employee’s home IP address. This helps prevent unauthorized users from attempting to connect to the network from unknown or potentially dangerous locations.
Furthermore, ACLs can be used to limit the types of resources that remote users can access. For example, remote employees may need to access email servers but should not have permission to connect to internal file servers or databases. By using ACLs, network administrators can enforce these rules, ensuring that remote access is granted only for the necessary resources.
Using ACLs in Data Center Environments
Data centers, which house critical infrastructure and large amounts of sensitive data, require robust security controls to prevent unauthorized access and protect data integrity. ACLs are commonly used in data centers to filter traffic between different segments, such as web servers, application servers, and database servers.
In a typical data center environment, network traffic must be tightly controlled to ensure that only the appropriate data flows between systems. ACLs can be applied to routers, firewalls, and switches to enforce these policies. For example, administrators can create ACL rules that:
- Allow traffic from web servers to application servers, but block traffic from public internet sources.
- Limit access to database servers to only specific application servers, preventing unauthorized access.
- Ensure that management interfaces are only accessible from trusted IP ranges, reducing the risk of an attack on the network infrastructure.
ACLs can also help mitigate the impact of potential security breaches. In the event that an attacker gains access to one part of the network, ACLs can be used to restrict lateral movement and prevent the attacker from accessing other systems within the data center.
Protecting Cloud Environments with ACLs
With the increasing adoption of cloud-based services, many organizations are extending their networks to include cloud environments. This introduces new security challenges, particularly in terms of controlling access to cloud resources. ACLs can be applied to both private and public cloud environments to ensure that only authorized users and systems can interact with cloud services.
In cloud environments, ACLs are used to manage access to virtual machines (VMs), storage systems, and application services. For example, an organization may use ACLs to:
- Control access to cloud-based storage, ensuring that only authorized applications and users can upload or download sensitive data.
- Restrict access to cloud-hosted databases, allowing only specific IP addresses or subnets to connect to the database instances.
- Manage inbound and outbound traffic to cloud-based web applications, ensuring that only legitimate users can access the services.
Cloud providers often offer integrated ACL functionality within their management platforms, making it easier for administrators to configure and enforce these rules. By using ACLs in conjunction with other security measures, such as encryption and multi-factor authentication, organizations can ensure that their cloud environments remain secure.
ACLs in Network Security Monitoring
In addition to securing network traffic, ACLs also play a key role in network security monitoring. By controlling what traffic is allowed to enter and leave a network, ACLs can help detect potential security incidents early on. For example, if an unauthorized device attempts to access a protected network segment, the ACL will block the request and generate a log entry that can be monitored by security teams.
Administrators can use ACLs in conjunction with network monitoring tools to identify unusual traffic patterns or potential vulnerabilities. For example, by logging denied traffic, administrators can gain insights into attempts to breach the network, including the source of the attack and the types of resources targeted.
Network security monitoring systems can be configured to alert administrators whenever ACLs deny access to critical resources or when unusual patterns of blocked traffic are detected. This provides an early warning mechanism that allows for quick intervention and the mitigation of potential threats.
Best Practices for Deploying ACLs in Real-World Networks
To maximize the effectiveness of ACLs in real-world applications, network administrators should follow best practices that ensure optimal performance and security.
- Adopt the Principle of Least Privilege: ACLs should be configured to allow only the minimum level of access required for each user or system. By restricting unnecessary access, organizations can reduce the risk of potential security breaches.
- Regularly Review ACLs: As networks evolve, so too should the ACL configurations. Administrators should review and update ACLs regularly to ensure they reflect changes in the network topology, security policies, and business requirements.
- Test ACLs Thoroughly: Before applying ACLs to production systems, it’s crucial to test them in a controlled environment. This allows administrators to verify that the rules are working as expected and that no legitimate traffic is being unintentionally blocked.
- Document ACL Configurations: Proper documentation of ACLs is essential for maintaining network security and ensuring that configurations can be easily reviewed and audited. Documentation should include details such as the purpose of each ACL, the specific rules applied, and the interfaces to which they are assigned.
- Monitor and Log ACL Activity: Continuous monitoring and logging of ACL activity are critical for identifying security incidents and understanding network behavior. By analyzing logs, administrators can detect suspicious activity and take corrective action before a breach occurs.
Access Control Lists (ACLs) are a fundamental tool in network security, offering granular control over traffic flow and providing a mechanism for enforcing security policies. In real-world applications, ACLs can be used to protect corporate networks, prioritize traffic, secure remote access, safeguard data centers, and protect cloud environments. By applying best practices, testing configurations thoroughly, and regularly reviewing rules, administrators can ensure that ACLs remain an effective tool in maintaining network integrity.
The Future of Access Control Lists: Evolving with Network Security Challenges
As network infrastructures continue to evolve and adapt to the complexities of the digital world, the role of Access Control Lists (ACLs) in network security is also transforming. With the growing adoption of cloud services, the rise of Internet of Things (IoT) devices, and the ongoing shift towards more dynamic and decentralized network environments, ACLs must evolve to meet the new challenges. This final part of the article series will explore the future of ACLs, examining how they are likely to adapt to emerging trends in network security and what new technologies might shape their use in the coming years.
The Shift Toward Zero Trust Security Models
One of the most significant trends in network security today is the shift toward the Zero Trust security model. This approach assumes that no user or device—whether inside or outside the network—should be trusted by default. Instead, every access request must be verified before being allowed.
Zero Trust security models require continuous authentication, stringent access controls, and thorough monitoring. In this context, ACLs play an essential role in defining and enforcing access policies based on the principle of least privilege. However, as the Zero Trust model gains traction, ACLs must evolve from simple packet-filtering rules to more dynamic, context-based access controls.
For example, traditional ACLs might restrict access based on IP addresses, subnets, or port numbers. In a Zero Trust model, ACLs may need to incorporate additional context, such as the user’s role within the organization, the security posture of the device being used, or the time of day the access request is being made. This dynamic approach ensures that access is continuously validated, reducing the risk of unauthorized access.
Integration with AI and Machine Learning
Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) are becoming integral to network security, offering advanced capabilities for threat detection, anomaly detection, and adaptive response. ACLs, when integrated with AI and ML, can become more intelligent and adaptive in real time.
For example, traditional ACLs operate based on pre-defined rules that need to be manually updated as the network changes. However, by leveraging AI, ACLs could automatically adjust access controls based on real-time analysis of traffic patterns and user behavior. Machine learning algorithms could be employed to detect unusual or potentially malicious behavior and adjust ACL rules accordingly, blocking traffic that deviates from normal patterns without requiring manual intervention.
Moreover, AI-powered ACLs could continuously assess the security context of devices, users, and applications, ensuring that access permissions are dynamically updated based on the evolving security landscape. This integration would not only improve the efficiency of ACLs but also enhance the overall security of the network.
Managing Access in Multi-Cloud Environments
As organizations continue to migrate to multi-cloud and hybrid cloud environments, managing access control across multiple platforms has become increasingly complex. With data and applications distributed across various cloud providers, network administrators face the challenge of maintaining consistent security policies across these diverse environments.
In multi-cloud environments, traditional ACLs—if used in isolation—may struggle to provide consistent and efficient access control. However, by incorporating advanced network segmentation, identity-based access controls, and orchestration tools, ACLs can be adapted to work seamlessly across multiple cloud platforms.
For example, cloud-native security solutions, such as Kubernetes, allow ACLs to be applied across cloud resources, enabling administrators to define access policies based on application-level attributes rather than simply IP addresses or subnets. As cloud environments become more integrated with on-premise infrastructures, ACLs will need to be flexible and interoperable across various cloud providers, ensuring that access control remains consistent and secure regardless of where resources are hosted.
Addressing the Challenge of IoT and Device Proliferation
The proliferation of Internet of Things (IoT) devices presents a unique challenge for network security. With thousands of connected devices generating vast amounts of data, ensuring secure access to these devices—and controlling their interactions with the network—has become a critical concern. ACLs must evolve to manage the unique characteristics of IoT devices, such as their constantly changing IP addresses, limited computing power, and often minimal security measures.
One way ACLs can address IoT security challenges is through more granular, device-level access controls. Rather than relying solely on traditional IP-based ACL rules, administrators can implement ACLs that recognize the specific characteristics of each IoT device, such as device identity, type, and the network services it requires. This would allow for more precise access control, ensuring that only authorized devices can communicate with the network and that their interactions are strictly controlled.
Additionally, IoT devices often operate in highly dynamic environments, where devices may frequently join or leave the network. ACLs in these contexts need to be flexible and capable of handling device mobility without compromising security. As more organizations adopt IoT, the role of ACLs will continue to evolve to meet the needs of this highly dynamic and rapidly growing segment of networked devices.
Integration with Blockchain for Enhanced Security
Blockchain technology, with its decentralized and immutable nature, holds promise as a future tool for enhancing network security. By incorporating blockchain into ACL systems, organizations could enhance the integrity and transparency of access control mechanisms. Blockchain could provide a secure and auditable record of all ACL rule changes, ensuring that access control policies are immutable and that all modifications are traceable.
In addition to this, blockchain could be used to create decentralized access control models, where users and devices can be authenticated without the need for a central authority. By leveraging smart contracts and cryptographic authentication methods, organizations can create highly secure, automated access control systems that rely on blockchain for verification.
This approach could be particularly useful in decentralized environments, such as distributed networks, where traditional centralized access control methods may not be sufficient. By integrating ACLs with blockchain technology, network administrators could ensure the highest level of transparency, accountability, and security.
Future-Proofing ACLs with Automation
As networks continue to grow in complexity, manual management of ACLs will become increasingly difficult. The future of ACLs lies in automation. By automating the configuration, deployment, and management of ACL rules, organizations can ensure that access controls remain up to date with minimal administrative effort.
Automation tools can be integrated with network management systems, allowing ACLs to be dynamically configured based on real-time network conditions, security incidents, and organizational changes. For example, automation could enable ACLs to automatically adjust in response to changes in user roles, the introduction of new devices, or the detection of anomalous network behavior.
By automating ACL management, network administrators can reduce the risk of human error and ensure that access controls remain consistent and aligned with organizational security policies.
Conclusion
The future of Access Control Lists is deeply intertwined with the ongoing evolution of network security. As networks become more complex, decentralized, and dynamic, ACLs will need to adapt to new technologies and security models. From Zero Trust to AI-powered access controls, multi-cloud environments, and IoT security, ACLs will continue to be an essential tool for managing access in the face of emerging challenges.
As technology evolves, so too will the capabilities of ACLs. By adopting these new trends and incorporating advanced technologies, organizations can ensure that their network security remains robust, adaptive, and capable of handling the challenges of the future. The future of ACLs is one of increased intelligence, flexibility, and automation, paving the way for more secure, efficient, and dynamic networks.
