Visit here for our full Microsoft SC-300 exam dumps and practice test questions.
Question 101
You need to implement a policy that blocks sign-ins from unfamiliar locations for privileged accounts but allows regular users to sign in from any location. Which solution should you use?
A) Require MFA for all users
B) Conditional Access policies with location-based and role-based targeting
C) Security Defaults only
D) Assign permanent administrative roles
Answer: B
Explanation:
A Requiring MFA for all users provides strong authentication but does not differentiate based on location or user role. MFA alone cannot block sign-ins from specific geographic areas for privileged accounts, which leaves potential attack vectors unmitigated. It may improve security for the general user population, but without role-based targeting, privileged accounts remain vulnerable to risky sign-ins from unfamiliar locations.
B Conditional Access policies with location-based and role-based targeting provide precise control over access to sensitive resources. SC-300 candidates should understand how to configure policies to identify privileged roles, such as Global Administrators or Billing Administrators, and enforce strict restrictions based on IP location or geographic region. By defining trusted IP ranges and blocked locations, organizations can prevent unauthorized sign-ins from potentially compromised locations while still allowing regular users to access resources from diverse locations. Integrating these policies with Azure AD Identity Protection enhances security by evaluating user risk and triggering adaptive actions such as MFA or sign-in blocking. Conditional Access policies support zero-trust principles by continuously validating sign-ins based on context, ensuring that sensitive accounts are only used securely. Reporting and auditing capabilities allow administrators to monitor policy effectiveness, detect attempts from blocked locations, and refine rules over time. By applying Conditional Access selectively to privileged accounts, organizations reduce the likelihood of breaches while minimizing impact on regular users. This approach also supports regulatory compliance by ensuring high-risk sign-ins are mitigated, which is particularly important in industries with strict data protection requirements.
C Security Defaults enforce baseline MFA but do not provide granular role-based or location-based controls. They cannot differentiate between privileged and regular accounts, making them unsuitable for this scenario.
D Assigning permanent administrative roles provides privileges but does not implement security controls to restrict sign-ins based on location or risk. Privileged accounts would remain exposed without additional protective measures.
Question 102
You need to ensure that external contractors can access specific resources but their accounts automatically deactivate after the project ends. Which solution should you implement?
A) Assign permanent guest accounts manually
B) Azure AD B2B collaboration with access expiration policies
C) Share links via unsecured email
D) Grant administrative privileges to contractors
Answer: B
Explanation:
A Manual assignment of permanent guest accounts creates long-term security risks, as contractors retain access unless manually removed. Human error may result in contractors keeping access beyond the project lifecycle, violating least privilege and compliance standards. Tracking expiration dates manually is inefficient, especially for multiple contractors, and increases administrative overhead.
B Azure AD B2B collaboration with access expiration policies provides a secure, automated method to manage external access. By configuring access expiration for external users, contractors automatically lose access after the designated period, such as the project end date. SC-300 candidates should understand how to create B2B invitations, configure expiration policies, enforce Conditional Access for MFA, and integrate auditing and reporting for compliance tracking. Access Reviews can provide additional validation, ensuring only authorized users retain access during the project lifecycle. This approach reduces administrative burden, aligns with zero-trust principles, and minimizes the risk of unauthorized access. Contractors authenticate with their existing identity providers, eliminating the need for new passwords and simplifying the onboarding process. The system automatically manages group membership and application access, ensuring a consistent security posture. Logging and auditing provide visibility into external access activity, supporting compliance requirements such as GDPR and HIPAA. Conditional Access policies further enhance security by enforcing MFA, device compliance, and risk-based access for contractors. Overall, this solution is scalable, secure, and efficient for managing temporary external access in a professional environment.
C Sharing links via unsecured email lacks control, auditing, and automatic expiration. Links may be forwarded outside the intended audience, creating potential data exposure.
D Granting administrative privileges to external contractors is unnecessary and dangerous, giving excessive rights to non-employees and exposing critical systems to potential misuse or compromise.
Question 103
You need to enforce multi-factor authentication for users who sign in from new devices while allowing seamless access for familiar devices. Which solution is most appropriate?
A) Require MFA for all users
B) Security Defaults only
C) Conditional Access policies with sign-in risk and device state evaluation
D) Assign permanent administrative roles
Answer: C
Explanation:
A Requiring multi-factor authentication (MFA) for all users is an effective way to strengthen security by adding an additional layer of verification beyond passwords. This ensures that even if credentials are compromised, attackers cannot easily gain access to organizational resources. However, enforcing MFA for all users without considering context has drawbacks. Users signing in from familiar devices or trusted locations are still prompted to complete MFA, which can disrupt productivity and reduce the overall user experience. Repeated unnecessary MFA prompts may lead to “MFA fatigue,” where users become frustrated or attempt to bypass security measures, potentially undermining the organization’s security posture. SC-300 candidates should understand that while MFA is essential, applying it indiscriminately is less effective than using adaptive, risk-based approaches that consider context such as device trust, location, or sign-in behavior.
B Security Defaults in Azure AD provide a simple, out-of-the-box security baseline for organizations. They enforce basic protections like requiring MFA for all users and blocking legacy authentication protocols. While Security Defaults improve security for smaller or less complex environments, they are limited in scope. Security Defaults cannot determine whether a device is recognized or compliant, nor can they provide adaptive, context-aware authentication. This lack of granularity makes them insufficient for organizations that need fine-tuned control over access, such as only prompting MFA for high-risk sign-ins or unrecognized devices. SC-300 candidates should recognize that Security Defaults are suitable as a starting point but cannot replace Conditional Access policies for organizations requiring adaptive, risk-based security enforcement.
C Conditional Access policies with sign-in risk and device state evaluation allow adaptive MFA enforcement. SC-300 candidates should understand how to configure policies that detect new devices, evaluate device compliance, and enforce MFA selectively. Recognized or compliant devices can bypass MFA, improving user experience while maintaining security. Azure AD Identity Protection integrates to evaluate sign-in risk, including unusual locations or impossible travel scenarios. Device-based policies can leverage Intune enrollment and compliance states, ensuring that unmanaged or non-compliant devices trigger additional authentication requirements. Conditional Access logs provide auditing, reporting, and insight into policy effectiveness. This solution supports zero-trust security by continuously validating device trust and user identity. Organizations can implement adaptive authentication, balancing security with usability, reducing unnecessary MFA prompts, and protecting critical resources from unauthorized access. Regular reviews and fine-tuning of policies enhance security posture while minimizing operational disruption.
D Assigning permanent administrative roles does not enforce MFA or device-aware authentication, leaving new devices unprotected.
Question 104
You need to block sign-ins from countries where your organization does not operate, while still allowing users from approved countries. Which solution should you use?
A) Security Defaults only
B) Conditional Access policies with location-based controls
C) Require MFA for all users
D) Assign Global Administrator roles
Answer: B
Explanation:
A Security Defaults enforce baseline MFA protections but cannot block sign-ins by geographic location. They lack the flexibility required for this scenario.
B Conditional Access policies with location-based controls allow administrators to specify allowed or blocked countries. SC-300 candidates should understand how to define trusted IP ranges, evaluate location signals, and integrate with Azure AD Identity Protection. Policies can block access from unapproved countries while allowing trusted users seamless access. This approach enhances security by reducing the risk of unauthorized access from high-risk geographies. Conditional Access also supports adaptive enforcement, enabling MFA prompts for high-risk sign-ins or blocking access entirely based on defined risk thresholds. Reporting and auditing provide visibility into blocked sign-ins, policy triggers, and access patterns. Location-based Conditional Access aligns with zero-trust principles, continuously evaluating context to ensure secure access. It reduces exposure to credential-based attacks from regions outside the organization’s operational footprint, supports compliance, and improves operational efficiency by automating access controls without manual intervention. This method is scalable for enterprises with multiple global offices or cloud applications, providing centralized management and policy consistency.
C Requiring multi-factor authentication (MFA) is an important security measure because it adds an additional layer of protection beyond passwords. By requiring users to verify their identity through a second factor—such as a mobile app, SMS code, or hardware token—organizations can significantly reduce the risk of account compromise. However, MFA alone does not provide controls based on geographic location or other contextual factors. Users from high-risk or untrusted locations could still access resources if they successfully complete MFA, which may not meet security requirements for location-specific restrictions. SC-300 candidates must understand that MFA is a component of authentication security but does not replace Conditional Access policies, which can enforce location-based restrictions and other contextual controls.
D Assigning Global Administrator roles to users grants full administrative privileges across the Azure AD tenant. While this provides the ability to manage users, groups, and applications, it does not provide any form of location-based access control. Giving someone administrative rights is unrelated to restricting access based on geographic location, device compliance, or other risk signals. This approach is not only ineffective for meeting location-based security requirements but also introduces significant risk, as Global Administrators can make critical changes across the tenant. SC-300 best practices emphasize the principle of least privilege and the use of Conditional Access policies to enforce contextual controls rather than assigning high-level roles unnecessarily.
Question 105
You need to automatically remove users from all Azure AD groups and applications when they are terminated. Which solution is most effective?
A) Manual removal from all groups
B) Security Defaults only
C) Dynamic groups with attribute-based membership rules
D) Require MFA for all users
Answer: C
Explanation:
A Manual removal is inefficient, error-prone, and not scalable. Employees leaving the organization may retain access if administrators forget or delay revocation. This method also creates compliance risks for organizations that must demonstrate control over user access.
B Security Defaults enforce baseline MFA protections but do not automatically revoke access for terminated employees. They lack any mechanism for access lifecycle management based on user attributes.
C Dynamic groups with attribute-based membership rules automate access removal for terminated employees. SC-300 candidates should understand how to configure dynamic rules using attributes such as employment status, department, or job title. When an employee leaves, the system automatically removes them from all groups and associated application access. Integrating Access Reviews ensures continued validation of group memberships. Conditional Access policies maintain secure access while dynamic groups enforce proper user lifecycle management. Automated revocation reduces administrative burden, prevents lingering access, and aligns with zero-trust principles. Audit logs provide visibility into access changes, supporting regulatory compliance. Dynamic groups ensure that enterprise access is consistent, secure, and responsive to organizational changes. The approach also mitigates risks associated with orphaned accounts or excessive permissions, which are critical for organizations with frequent employee turnover or complex group structures.
D Requiring MFA strengthens authentication but does not automatically remove access for terminated employees, leaving potential security gaps.
Question 106:
You need to enforce multi-factor authentication (MFA) only for users signing in from unmanaged devices. Which solution should you use?
A) Enable security defaults
B) Configure conditional access policy targeting device compliance
C) Assign MFA per user manually
D) Use baseline protection policies
Answer: B
Explanation:
A Security defaults are designed to provide baseline security for all users by enforcing fundamental protections such as mandatory MFA for all privileged accounts and certain risky sign-ins. However, they lack the ability to apply context-specific rules. For example, they cannot distinguish between devices that are managed and compliant versus unmanaged or potentially insecure devices. While security defaults are valuable in smaller organizations or for baseline protection, they cannot meet the requirement of enforcing MFA selectively based on device state. Implementing security defaults in this scenario would result in MFA prompts for all users, including those accessing resources from secure, compliant devices, creating unnecessary friction and user frustration
B Conditional access policies targeting device compliance are the most suitable solution for this scenario. Conditional access allows administrators to define policies that dynamically evaluate multiple risk signals such as user location, device compliance, application sensitivity, and session context. By integrating with Intune or other device management systems, the policy can detect whether a device is compliant, managed, and secure. If the device is unmanaged or non-compliant, the policy triggers MFA enforcement, ensuring that risky access is protected. This approach adheres to zero-trust security principles by evaluating trust continuously rather than assuming inherent safety. Additionally, conditional access provides detailed logging and reporting capabilities for auditing and regulatory compliance. Administrators can also configure exceptions, targeting only specific applications or groups, which allows a balance between security and user experience. This method is scalable for large organizations and reduces administrative overhead compared to manual enforcement
C Assigning MFA manually to individual users is inefficient and error-prone, especially in medium or large organizations. Manual assignment lacks dynamic evaluation based on device compliance or risk signals, making it impossible to enforce conditional MFA policies selectively. Users would either have MFA enforced universally or not at all, creating gaps in security coverage or unnecessary friction
D Baseline protection policies were designed to provide preconfigured security settings, including MFA and protection for privileged roles. While easier to implement than custom policies, baseline policies cannot enforce device-specific conditional rules. They cannot differentiate between managed and unmanaged devices, and therefore cannot meet the requirement of enforcing MFA only for specific risk contexts
Question 107:
You want to automate the removal of guest users who have been inactive for more than 30 days. Which feature should you implement?
A) Conditional access policies
B) Privileged Identity Management (PIM)
C) Entitlement management with access reviews
D) Security defaults
Answer: C
Explanation:
A Conditional access policies control how and when users access resources based on conditions such as location, device compliance, application sensitivity, and risk level. While they help enforce access restrictions and MFA requirements, they do not handle the lifecycle management of guest users. Conditional access cannot automatically remove users who have been inactive for a specified period. Its primary role is risk-based access control, not user lifecycle automation
B Privileged Identity Management (PIM) is focused on managing time-bound and just-in-time elevated administrative roles. It enables temporary activation of roles, requires approval, and logs all actions for auditing. However, PIM does not manage guest user accounts or automate their removal based on activity or inactivity. It is limited to privileged role governance rather than user lifecycle management for guests
C Entitlement management with access reviews is specifically designed to handle scenarios like this. Administrators can create access packages for guest users and configure recurring access reviews to ensure that only users who need access retain it. Inactive users, such as those who have not signed in for 30 days, can be automatically removed or flagged for review. This approach improves security by reducing the attack surface, ensures compliance with policies and regulations, and provides detailed logs for auditing purposes. Access reviews can also integrate with workflows for approval, making it possible to validate exceptions or business requirements before removal. This method is scalable for large organizations with multiple guest users, and it aligns with the principle of least privilege by ensuring that access is limited to only those who actively need it
D Security defaults enforce baseline protections like MFA and basic identity security for all accounts. They do not manage guest account lifecycles, nor do they provide the automation necessary for removing inactive users. While they are important for foundational security, they cannot meet the requirement of automatically removing guest users after 30 days of inactivity
Question 108:
You need to ensure that only approved applications can access Microsoft Graph using delegated permissions. What should you configure?
A) Allow all users to consent freely
B) Configure application consent policies requiring admin approval
C) Disable OAuth 2.0 entirely
D) Apply conditional access to block user consent
Answer: B
Explanation:
A Allowing all users to consent freely to applications accessing Microsoft Graph can introduce significant security risks. Users might unknowingly grant access to unverified or malicious applications, which could expose sensitive organizational data. While user consent is convenient, it does not provide governance or oversight. Unrestricted consent can result in privilege escalation and data leakage, violating least-privilege and zero-trust principles
B Application consent policies provide a structured and secure way to manage delegated permissions for Microsoft Graph. Administrators can require approval for unverified or new applications, ensuring that only trusted and approved applications gain access. Pre-approved applications can bypass the approval workflow, reducing friction while maintaining security. This method provides detailed audit logs for compliance and allows granular control over which users or groups can consent to specific applications. The combination of admin approval and pre-approval workflows ensures that organizational data remains secure while enabling productivity for users accessing necessary applications
C Disabling OAuth 2.0 entirely would prevent modern applications from authenticating and accessing resources using delegated permissions. While it would eliminate consent risks, it would also break legitimate workflows and integrations, making it an impractical and disruptive solution
D Conditional access can block sign-ins or require MFA based on risk signals but does not control the app consent process directly. Therefore, it cannot prevent unverified applications from obtaining delegated permissions, making it insufficient for managing Microsoft Graph consent policies
Question 109:
You need to implement just-in-time administrative access for Azure AD administrators. Which feature should you use?
A) Assign permanent global administrator roles
B) Enable privileged identity management with eligible roles
C) Use access reviews only
D) Apply security defaults
Answer: B
Explanation:
A Assigning permanent global administrator roles is the least secure option, as it provides indefinite access to privileged accounts. Users may retain high-level privileges unnecessarily, increasing the risk of misuse or compromise. This approach violates the principle of least privilege and is not compliant with modern security frameworks
B Privileged Identity Management (PIM) provides just-in-time access for administrators. It allows users to request activation of eligible roles for a limited time, with optional approval workflows and mandatory MFA. Access automatically expires, reducing the attack surface and aligning with least privilege and zero-trust principles. PIM also provides detailed logs and audit reports, which are essential for compliance and monitoring. By enabling temporary administrative access, organizations can minimize the number of standing privileged accounts while maintaining operational efficiency
C Access reviews are periodic evaluations of role assignments. While they are useful for auditing and removing outdated permissions, they do not enable real-time, on-demand activation of roles. They cannot provide just-in-time access, making them insufficient for this requirement
D Security defaults provide baseline protections, such as mandatory MFA for privileged roles, but do not support temporary activation, approval workflows, or time-bound access. They cannot implement just-in-time administrative access
Question 110:
You want to require MFA for all users accessing sensitive financial applications only from unmanaged devices while allowing compliant devices seamless access. Which solution is best?
A) Require MFA for all users globally
B) Configure conditional access policy targeting device compliance
C) Enable security defaults
D) Use baseline protection policies
Answer: B
Explanation:
A Requiring MFA globally is overly restrictive and affects all users, including those accessing resources from secure and compliant devices. While it improves security, it may create user friction and reduce productivity, particularly for trusted internal users
B Conditional access policies targeting device compliance provide the most granular control. Administrators can enforce MFA only for users accessing sensitive applications from unmanaged or non-compliant devices. Compliant devices gain seamless access, ensuring security without hindering productivity. This solution integrates with device management tools like Intune, allowing continuous evaluation of device compliance and state. It also supports detailed logging for compliance, audit, and reporting purposes. Conditional access policies can be scoped to specific applications, groups, or locations, providing a flexible and scalable approach to secure critical financial data while adhering to zero-trust principles
C Security defaults enforce MFA universally but lack conditional logic to differentiate between compliant and unmanaged devices. They cannot selectively enforce MFA based on device state
D Baseline protection policies offer predefined security settings but do not provide the flexibility to enforce device-specific MFA. They cannot distinguish between managed and unmanaged devices, making them insufficient for this scenario
Question 111:
You need to restrict access to SharePoint Online for external users only during business hours. Which approach should you use?
A) Configure conditional access policy with device compliance rules
B) Enable Azure AD entitlement management for SharePoint access
C) Use conditional access policy with sign-in risk and time-based controls
D) Enable security defaults in Azure AD
Answer: C
Explanation:
A Device compliance ensures that only secure devices can access resources but does not allow time-based enforcement. It evaluates security posture rather than enforcing access restrictions during specific hours, making it inadequate for this requirement.
B Entitlement management automates access assignments and approval workflows for guest users, but it does not allow enforcement of access strictly during business hours. Its focus is on lifecycle management rather than temporal control.
C Conditional access policies with sign-in risk and time-based controls are ideal for this scenario. These policies can combine user type, location, device compliance, and sign-in risk signals, and enforce access only during defined business hours. External users attempting access outside these hours can be blocked or prompted for additional verification. Logging and auditing features ensure administrators can monitor access patterns and maintain compliance, while session controls can enforce editing restrictions outside business hours.
D Security defaults enforce baseline protections such as MFA for privileged accounts but cannot manage access based on specific hours. They are broad protections and do not meet this granular requirement.
Question 112:
You need to allow users to reset their passwords only if their device is compliant. Which feature should you use?
A) Configure self-service password reset (SSPR) with device-based restrictions
B) Require MFA for all users globally
C) Enable security defaults
D) Assign password reset permissions manually per user
Answer: A
Explanation:
A SSPR with device-based restrictions allows password resets only from compliant or managed devices. This is achieved by integrating Azure AD with Intune, enabling real-time evaluation of device compliance. Administrators can also require MFA during the password reset process for added security. This approach aligns with zero-trust principles and reduces administrative overhead. Audit logs provide detailed insights into which users performed resets and from which devices, supporting regulatory compliance and internal governance.
B Enforcing MFA globally improves authentication security but does not restrict password resets based on device compliance. Users on insecure devices could still reset passwords if MFA is satisfied, which does not meet the requirement.
C Security defaults provide baseline protection like MFA but do not include device-based restrictions for password resets.
D Manually assigning password reset permissions is inefficient, does not scale well, and cannot enforce compliance-based conditions, making it unsuitable for enterprise deployment.
Question 113:
You need to monitor and report on risky sign-ins for privileged accounts. Which feature should you implement?
A) Conditional access policies
B) Azure AD Identity Protection
C) Security defaults
D) Privileged Identity Management (PIM)
Answer: B
Explanation:
A Conditional access policies enforce rules for access based on signals like location, device compliance, or risk, but they do not provide monitoring or detailed reporting on risky sign-ins.
B Azure AD Identity Protection is designed to detect, investigate, and respond to identity risks. It evaluates signals such as unfamiliar locations, leaked credentials, and impossible travel scenarios. For privileged accounts, administrators can define automated actions such as requiring MFA, password reset, or temporary account suspension. Identity Protection also provides detailed reports and audit logs, allowing organizations to track trends, detect anomalies, and demonstrate compliance. Integration with conditional access allows automatic enforcement based on detected risks, ensuring a proactive security posture for sensitive accounts.
C Security defaults enforce MFA broadly but do not provide reporting or risk-based actions for sign-ins.
D Privileged Identity Management (PIM) focuses on just-in-time access and role activation, reducing standing privileges, but it does not detect or report risky sign-ins.
Question 114:
You need to provide external vendors with temporary access to a group of Azure resources for a project. Which solution should you use?
A) Assign permanent guest accounts with global access
B) Use Azure AD entitlement management with access packages
C) Enable security defaults
D) Configure conditional access for external users only
Answer: B
Explanation:
A Assigning permanent guest accounts grants excessive privileges and creates administrative overhead. It violates least privilege principles and introduces unnecessary security risk.
B Azure AD entitlement management with access packages allows temporary access with defined start and end dates, approval workflows, and automated removal after project completion. Access packages can include group memberships, application assignments, and role-based permissions, ensuring external vendors receive only the permissions they need. Periodic access reviews maintain compliance, and detailed logging provides an audit trail of assignments and removals.
C Security defaults provide baseline MFA protections but do not manage temporary access or external user lifecycle.
D Conditional access policies can control access signals like location or device state but do not automate temporary assignment or approval workflows, so they are insufficient for this scenario.
Question 15
Which Microsoft Entra ID feature should you use to ensure employees cannot access applications from untrusted or risky locations automatically?
A) Conditional Access Policies
B) Identity Protection Risk Policies
C) Security Defaults
D) Privileged Identity Management
Answer: A)
Explanation:
A Conditional Access Policies provide the capability to enforce real-time access restrictions based on location, device compliance, user, and application sensitivity. By configuring a policy that evaluates the network location, administrators can block access from untrusted networks or require additional verification such as MFA. Conditional Access Policies allow precise control over access scenarios, ensuring high-risk situations are mitigated while low-risk users experience minimal friction. Policies can also be combined with device compliance signals from Microsoft Intune to enforce access only from approved devices. Conditional Access aligns with zero-trust security principles, making it the most suitable feature to dynamically manage access.
B Identity Protection Risk Policies are designed to detect suspicious sign-ins and risky accounts. While they can block or require MFA for risky sign-ins, they are primarily reactive, detecting anomalies rather than proactively enforcing access based on trusted locations. They complement Conditional Access but do not replace it, as they focus on user risk rather than location-specific access control. Relying solely on risk policies may leave users accessing sensitive applications from untrusted locations without additional verification.
C Security Defaults are pre-configured settings that enforce basic security measures such as MFA for all users. These are intended to provide baseline security but lack the flexibility required to implement nuanced policies based on location, device compliance, or application sensitivity. Security Defaults are useful for smaller organizations but are insufficient for granular access management in enterprises with complex application and network requirements.
D Privileged Identity Management (PIM) manages role-based elevated access, enabling just-in-time activation and access reviews for privileged roles. PIM is unrelated to enforcing access policies for general users or evaluating access based on location. While PIM is essential for managing high-risk roles, it does not provide mechanisms to block or require MFA for untrusted networks for regular application access.
Question 16
Which approach in Microsoft Entra ID is optimal to delegate user account management without granting full global administrative permissions?
A) User Administrator Role
B) Global Administrator Role
C) Billing Administrator Role
D) Privileged Role Administrator
Answer: A
Explanation:
A User Administrator Role allows administrators to create, manage, and remove users, reset passwords, and manage group memberships without providing unrestricted access to the directory. This delegation strategy supports least privilege principles, minimizing risk by granting only necessary permissions. Administrators can handle day-to-day identity management while sensitive operations remain protected. The role is compatible with Azure AD Privileged Identity Management, allowing just-in-time role assignments to reduce permanent privilege exposure. Delegated administration enhances security posture and maintains compliance with regulatory frameworks.
B Global Administrator Role provides unrestricted access across the entire directory and all administrative functions. Assigning routine user management tasks to this role is excessive and risky, violating the principle of least privilege. Misuse or compromise of a global administrator account could result in full tenant exposure.
C Billing Administrator Role manages subscriptions, billing, and service requests. It has no capabilities for creating or managing user accounts, making it irrelevant for delegating identity management responsibilities.
D Privileged Role Administrator allows administrators to manage role assignments, including privileged roles, but does not grant comprehensive user account management. This role is more suitable for managing administrative privileges rather than day-to-day user management.
Question 17
A company wants to ensure privileged role assignments are temporary and periodically reviewed. Which Microsoft Entra ID feature is ideal for this?
A) Privileged Identity Management
B) Security Defaults
C) Conditional Access Policies
D) Identity Protection
Answer: A
Explanation:
A Privileged Identity Management (PIM) enables just-in-time activation of privileged roles, ensuring users receive elevated access only when necessary. PIM also supports access reviews to periodically verify role assignments, helping organizations prevent over-privileged accounts and comply with regulatory requirements. Audit logs and alerts allow monitoring of role activations, providing accountability and visibility. Temporary assignments reduce risk, preventing stale or unused privileged roles from becoming vulnerabilities. PIM is essential for enforcing security hygiene for high-impact administrative roles.
B Security Defaults provide baseline security enforcement, including MFA for all users, but do not offer mechanisms for managing temporary privileged access or scheduling role reviews.
C Conditional Access Policies enforce access based on user, device, location, and application conditions. These policies manage general user access but are not designed for temporary elevation of administrative privileges or role review automation.
D Identity Protection monitors user and sign-in risk, detecting suspicious behavior and potential compromise. While it helps protect accounts, it does not manage role assignments or implement temporary privileged access.
Question 18
Which Microsoft Entra ID solution ensures only compliant devices can access sensitive corporate applications and data?
A) Conditional Access with Device Compliance Policies
B) Identity Protection
C) Privileged Identity Management
D) Security Defaults
Answer: A)
Explanation:
A Conditional Access with Device Compliance Policies enables administrators to enforce access only for devices that meet security requirements such as encryption, updated antivirus, and endpoint protection. Integration with Microsoft Intune allows automatic evaluation of device posture during each sign-in attempt. Non-compliant devices can be blocked, redirected for remediation, or limited to specific applications. This approach ensures secure access, minimizes the risk of breaches via compromised endpoints, and supports compliance with regulatory frameworks.
B Identity Protection evaluates user sign-ins and account risk but does not enforce device compliance checks. It is reactive rather than proactive and cannot restrict access based solely on device posture.
C Privileged Identity Management manages elevated access for administrative roles and does not control general device access.
D Security Defaults enforce baseline protections like MFA but do not evaluate device posture.
Question 19
Which method allows external partners to securely access specific company resources without creating permanent corporate accounts?
A) Azure AD B2B Collaboration
B) Assigning Global Administrator Roles
C) Creating Separate Corporate Accounts
D) Using Privileged Access Groups
Answer: A)
Explanation:
A Azure AD Business-to-Business (B2B) Collaboration allows organizations to securely invite external users as guest accounts. These external collaborators can authenticate using their existing credentials—such as personal Microsoft accounts or accounts from another organization—without the need to create permanent corporate accounts. This approach reduces administrative overhead, minimizes security risks, and maintains a clear separation between internal and external identities. Organizations can control access by restricting guest users to specific applications like Teams, SharePoint, or other Microsoft 365 resources. Conditional Access policies can further enhance security by enforcing requirements such as multi-factor authentication (MFA), device compliance, and location-based restrictions. Additionally, guest accounts integrate with auditing, reporting, and access reviews, enabling administrators to maintain visibility and ensure that access is granted appropriately and revoked when no longer needed. For SC-300 candidates, understanding how to configure B2B invitations, apply access policies, and monitor guest activity is critical for secure external collaboration while adhering to zero-trust principles.
B Assigning Global Administrator roles to external users is extremely risky and should never be done. Global Administrators have unrestricted access to all aspects of the Azure AD tenant, including user management, application registration, and security settings. Granting such privileges to external collaborators exposes the organization to severe security threats, including accidental or malicious changes to critical configurations. SC-300 best practices emphasize the principle of least privilege, which ensures that users—internal or external—receive only the permissions necessary to perform their tasks. For external collaborators, administrative roles are unnecessary; access should be limited to specific resources and controlled through conditional access policies and role-based access control (RBAC).
C Creating separate corporate accounts for external partners adds unnecessary complexity to identity management. Each new account requires provisioning, licensing, and lifecycle management, increasing administrative overhead and operational cost. Additionally, separate accounts create additional attack surfaces, as each account becomes a potential target for attackers. SC-300 candidates should understand that using guest accounts via B2B collaboration is a secure and efficient alternative. It allows external users to access resources without creating new corporate accounts, while still providing centralized management, auditing, and conditional access enforcement.
D Privileged Access Groups are designed to manage elevated access for internal users and privileged roles within an organization. They are not intended for external collaboration. These groups help enforce just-in-time access, approval workflows, and time-bound privileges for internal administrators, ensuring security and compliance. Assigning external users to these groups would violate access governance principles, introduce unnecessary risk, and bypass controls designed specifically for internal privileged users. SC-300 candidates must differentiate between internal privileged management and secure external collaboration practices.
Question 20
Which feature allows automatic removal of inactive guest users in Microsoft Entra ID to maintain directory hygiene and security compliance?
A) Entitlement Management Access Reviews
B) Conditional Access Policies
C) Identity Protection
D) Security Defaults
Answer: A)
Explanation:
A Entitlement Management Access Reviews enable organizations to automatically review and remove inactive guest users, ensuring that external accounts do not remain in the directory unnecessarily. Administrators can schedule periodic reviews, define approval workflows, and enforce expiration policies. This maintains directory hygiene, minimizes security risks associated with stale accounts, and supports compliance with regulatory frameworks. Integration with Azure AD B2B ensures external collaborators are managed efficiently, and audit logs provide visibility into access changes.
B Conditional Access (CA) policies are a key tool in Azure AD for controlling access to organizational resources based on signals such as user identity, device compliance, location, and the application being accessed. These policies allow organizations to enforce security requirements dynamically—for example, requiring MFA when a user signs in from an untrusted location or blocking access from non-compliant devices. While Conditional Access is powerful for managing access in real time and reducing risk, it does not handle the removal of inactive or stale user accounts. Users who no longer require access may remain in the directory indefinitely unless additional processes, such as access reviews or automated account expiration policies, are implemented. SC-300 candidates must understand that Conditional Access complements other identity governance mechanisms but does not replace them.
C Azure AD Identity Protection provides advanced monitoring and risk analysis by evaluating sign-ins and user accounts for suspicious or risky behavior. It can detect anomalies such as sign-ins from unfamiliar locations, atypical devices, or impossible travel scenarios. Identity Protection can automatically respond to some high-risk events—for example, requiring a password reset or enforcing MFA—but it does not remove inactive accounts. Users who are no longer active but have never triggered risk events remain in the directory. Therefore, while Identity Protection strengthens security by focusing on risk-based events, it must be combined with proper lifecycle management practices, such as automated account expiration, access reviews, or manual removal of inactive users. SC-300 candidates should be aware of this limitation to ensure comprehensive identity governance.
D Security Defaults in Azure AD offer a simple baseline security posture by enforcing protections such as MFA for all users and blocking legacy authentication protocols. While Security Defaults improve overall security and reduce exposure to common threats, they do not include functionality for automatically managing inactive accounts. Accounts that are inactive, whether for employees who have left the organization or external collaborators whose projects have ended, remain in the directory unless additional lifecycle management controls are applied. Security Defaults are therefore a starting point for security but are insufficient for organizations seeking full automation in account management and identity governance.
