Visit here for our full Microsoft SC-300 exam dumps and practice test questions.
Question 61
You need to ensure external partners can access specific SharePoint documents without creating user accounts. Which solution should you implement?
A) Use Azure AD B2B collaboration invitations
B) Assign partners permanent Global Administrator roles
C) Create guest accounts manually in the tenant
D) Share files via email attachments only
Answer: A
Explanation:
A Azure AD B2B collaboration allows external partners to securely access corporate resources without requiring permanent accounts. By sending invitation links, organizations can provide granular access to specific SharePoint documents while retaining control over permissions. B2B collaboration integrates with Conditional Access policies, MFA, and audit logging, ensuring compliance and security. This approach reduces administrative overhead and aligns with zero-trust principles, making it highly relevant for SC-300 candidates. Using B2B invites also supports access reviews, allowing periodic verification that external users only have access as needed.
B Assigning permanent Global Administrator roles to external partners is highly insecure. It grants unrestricted access to all resources, violating least privilege principles and increasing the risk of accidental or malicious changes. This option is unsuitable for controlled document sharing and does not meet security compliance requirements.
C Manually creating guest accounts is labor-intensive and error-prone. Although it allows access, it lacks automation, integration with access reviews, and proper lifecycle management, which can lead to stale accounts or excessive privileges over time. SC-300 candidates need to recognize that B2B collaboration is the modern, scalable solution for external access.
D Sharing files via email attachments is not secure, bypasses governance controls, and prevents centralized monitoring or revocation. Sensitive data can be inadvertently distributed, increasing risk and reducing compliance. Unlike B2B collaboration, this method does not allow administrators to control, track, or revoke access efficiently.
Question 62
You need to require multi-factor authentication for all users accessing Microsoft 365 from outside your corporate network. Which configuration should you apply?
A) Create a Conditional Access policy with location conditions and MFA enforcement
B) Enable Security Defaults without any policy customization
C) Configure device compliance policies only
D) Require MFA for all users at the individual account level
Answer: A
Explanation:
A Conditional Access allows administrators to enforce MFA based on location, device state, and user risk. By creating a policy that targets external locations, MFA can be triggered only when users access Microsoft 365 from outside the corporate network. This ensures a balance between security and user convenience, reducing friction for on-premises users. Conditional Access also integrates with risk-based policies and identity protection, which is a key skill tested in the SC-300 exam. This method supports access reviews, auditing, and compliance reporting.
B Security Defaults enforce MFA globally but cannot differentiate between internal and external locations. While it improves security baseline, it lacks the flexibility to implement conditional MFA based on geolocation, making it less suitable for nuanced organizational requirements.
C Device compliance policies verify that devices meet organizational security requirements but do not trigger MFA based on location or user risk. They can complement Conditional Access but are insufficient on their own to enforce MFA externally.
D Requiring MFA at the individual account level is inefficient and difficult to manage at scale. It does not support dynamic policy enforcement and lacks auditing capabilities, making Conditional Access the recommended solution for enterprise environments.
Question 63
You need to restrict access to a sensitive application to only approved devices. Which Azure AD feature should you use?
A) Conditional Access with device compliance requirements
B) Security Defaults without device checks
C) MFA enforcement without device restrictions
D) Assign permanent administrative roles
Answer: A
Explanation:
A Conditional Access allows administrators to restrict access based on device compliance. By integrating Intune device compliance policies, organizations can ensure that only approved, compliant devices can access sensitive applications. This enforces least privilege access, prevents unauthorized device use, and integrates with audit and reporting tools. SC-300 candidates should understand that this approach supports zero-trust models, combining user identity verification with device security posture.
B Security Defaults do not provide device-based access control and only enforce basic security measures such as MFA and blocking legacy authentication. They cannot evaluate device compliance, making them insufficient for protecting sensitive applications based on device status.
C MFA enforcement increases authentication security but does not prevent access from unapproved devices. Without device compliance checks, risky devices could still access sensitive data, violating organizational security policies and zero-trust principles.
D Assigning permanent administrative roles does not control access based on device status. It provides elevated privileges but does not enforce security controls for devices, making it irrelevant to restricting application access.
Question 64
You need to ensure privileged roles are only used when necessary and require approval for activation. Which Azure AD feature supports this requirement?
A) Privileged Identity Management (PIM)
B) Assign permanent Global Administrator roles
C) Enforce MFA for all users
D) Implement static group-based role assignments
Answer: A
Explanation:
A Privileged Identity Management (PIM) supports just-in-time access for privileged roles. It allows administrators to be eligible for a role rather than assigned permanently, requiring activation with approval, MFA, and time limits. This reduces exposure to risk, prevents privilege creep, and aligns with least privilege principles, making it a fundamental SC-300 topic. PIM also provides audit logs, access reviews, and alerts for suspicious activity, supporting compliance frameworks such as ISO 27001 or SOC 2.
B Assigning permanent Global Administrator roles provides unrestricted access at all times, violating the least privilege principle and increasing risk of misuse. This method does not require activation or approval workflows, making it unsuitable for modern privileged access management.
C Enforcing MFA improves authentication security but does not limit the timing or approval of privileged role usage. MFA is a security enhancement rather than a role governance solution and cannot replace PIM’s capabilities.
D Static group-based role assignments allow permanent access without conditional activation or approval. This can lead to stale privileges and unmonitored access, which is why SC-300 exam scenarios favor dynamic PIM-based management.
Question 65
You need to monitor and automatically respond to risky sign-ins in Azure AD. Which solution provides real-time risk detection and mitigation?
A) Azure AD Identity Protection with automated remediation
B) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint only
C) Device compliance policies without risk evaluation
D) Basic audit logs for manual intervention
Answer: A
Explanation:
A Azure AD Identity Protection continuously monitors user and sign-in risk using behavioral analytics, machine learning, and threat intelligence. It can automatically trigger remediation actions such as enforced MFA, password reset, or sign-in blocking. Integration with Conditional Access ensures only low-risk users gain access. This automated detection and response model aligns with zero-trust identity principles and reduces administrative overhead. SC-300 candidates must understand how to configure risk policies, review alerts, and respond automatically to suspicious activity for compliance and operational security.
B Microsoft Defender for Endpoint focuses on device threats, not identity risk. While it helps secure endpoints, it does not provide automated remediation for risky sign-ins or compromised accounts, making it insufficient for the scenario.
C Device compliance policies ensure devices meet security requirements but cannot detect or respond to compromised accounts or high-risk sign-ins. They complement identity protection but cannot replace real-time risk assessment.
D Basic audit logs provide information for manual review but do not automatically detect or mitigate risky sign-ins. Relying solely on logs is reactive and increases the window of exposure, highlighting the importance of Identity Protection for automated responses.
Question 66
You need to implement a process where administrative roles require approval before activation and are active only for a limited time. Which solution should you use?
A) Privileged Identity Management (PIM)
B) Assign permanent Global Administrator roles
C) Enable Security Defaults for all users
D) Configure device compliance policies
Answer: A
Explanation:
A Privileged Identity Management (PIM) is the most effective solution for controlling administrative access with just-in-time activation. By using PIM, administrators can be eligible for specific roles but are not permanently assigned them, ensuring that privileges are only granted when necessary. The system requires activation requests, which can include approval workflows, multi-factor authentication, and time-bound usage. This approach aligns with the principle of least privilege, which is essential for reducing risk and improving organizational security posture. PIM also provides robust auditing and reporting, which allows security teams to track role activation and identify unusual or suspicious activities. For SC-300 candidates, understanding PIM’s configuration options—including role settings, notifications, and access reviews—is critical, as exams often include scenarios on dynamic privilege management and compliance reporting. By implementing PIM, organizations can enforce governance policies while minimizing exposure to privilege escalation attacks and insider threats.
B Assigning permanent Global Administrator roles is highly insecure and does not include any approval or activation controls. Such assignments violate the principle of least privilege and increase the attack surface significantly, making it unsuitable for modern enterprises. Permanent roles also make auditing and compliance difficult, as administrators always have full privileges regardless of necessity.
C Security Defaults enforce basic security features such as MFA and blocking legacy authentication, but they do not manage role activation or approval. While they improve overall security baseline, they cannot provide just-in-time access for privileged roles or time-bound role activation, which is required in this scenario.
D Device compliance policies ensure devices meet security standards but are irrelevant to administrative role activation. They cannot restrict role activation, require approvals, or enforce time-bound administrative access. Although compliance policies complement identity and access management, they do not replace PIM for managing privileged roles.
Question 67
You need to block legacy authentication methods while allowing secure modern authentication for all users. Which approach should you take?
A) Configure Conditional Access policies targeting legacy authentication
B) Enable Security Defaults without modifications
C) Require MFA on all devices only
D) Disable Azure AD accounts manually
Answer: A
Explanation:
A Conditional Access policies in Azure AD allow organizations to block legacy authentication protocols, such as IMAP, POP, and SMTP, while enabling secure modern authentication methods like OAuth2 and SAML. By defining policies that target users or groups and specifying conditions for device compliance, location, or risk level, administrators can enforce secure access and reduce the likelihood of account compromise. Blocking legacy authentication is crucial because these older protocols cannot enforce MFA and are frequently targeted by attackers. SC-300 candidates must understand how to configure Conditional Access policies effectively, including setting conditions, controls, and exceptions. This method also integrates with reporting and monitoring tools, allowing organizations to detect attempts to bypass security controls. Modern authentication enforcement is a critical part of identity security strategies and aligns with zero-trust principles by ensuring that only compliant, verified users can access cloud resources securely.
B Enabling Security Defaults in Azure AD provides a basic security baseline, such as enforcing multi-factor authentication (MFA) and blocking legacy authentication globally. While this improves overall security posture, Security Defaults are limited in flexibility and granularity. They apply policies broadly and cannot selectively target specific legacy authentication protocols or users. Organizations with advanced security requirements often need the ability to block certain protocols while allowing exceptions for modern applications or trusted locations. Security Defaults cannot support such fine-grained access control, making them insufficient for organizations that require targeted enforcement of security policies. SC-300 candidates should understand that Security Defaults are useful for baseline protection but need to be supplemented with Conditional Access policies for more precise and adaptive control.
C Requiring MFA only on devices does not address the security risks posed by legacy authentication protocols. Many older applications and protocols cannot prompt for MFA, which creates a potential security gap. Attackers can exploit these weak authentication methods to gain unauthorized access, even if device-level MFA is enforced. To mitigate this risk, organizations must implement policies that explicitly block legacy authentication and enforce modern authentication methods. SC-300 candidates need to understand that MFA alone is not sufficient when legacy protocols are in use, and a combination of Conditional Access policies, protocol restrictions, and MFA enforcement is necessary to maintain a secure environment.
D Manually disabling accounts in Azure AD is neither practical nor scalable. It is disruptive to users and cannot differentiate between legacy and modern authentication usage, making it an ineffective approach to mitigating security risks associated with outdated protocols. Relying on manual account management introduces administrative overhead, increases the likelihood of errors, and can cause business interruptions. SC-300 best practices emphasize automated, policy-driven approaches—such as Conditional Access policies and risk-based sign-in protection—rather than manual interventions, to ensure efficiency, compliance, and continuous protection.
Question 68
You need to ensure that users signing in from high-risk locations are blocked automatically. Which Azure AD feature should you implement?
A) Conditional Access with sign-in risk policies
B) Device compliance policies only
C) Security Defaults without location awareness
D) Assign Global Administrator roles to affected users
Answer: A
Explanation:
A Conditional Access with sign-in risk policies is designed to automatically evaluate the risk associated with each authentication attempt. Risk factors may include unusual locations, unfamiliar devices, anonymous IP addresses, or atypical behavior. By configuring a policy that blocks high-risk sign-ins, organizations can prevent unauthorized access and potential breaches. SC-300 candidates must understand how to define risk levels, implement policies, and configure actions such as MFA requirement, session restrictions, or outright blocking. The integration of Conditional Access with Azure AD Identity Protection ensures that the organization has real-time risk detection and automated remediation, providing proactive security against credential compromise. Policies can be targeted to specific users, groups, or applications, and administrators can monitor and fine-tune risk thresholds based on organizational needs. This approach aligns with zero-trust identity principles by continuously evaluating both user and device risk before granting access.
B Device compliance policies in Azure AD are designed to ensure that devices accessing organizational resources meet defined security standards, such as having up-to-date operating systems, antivirus protection, or encryption enabled. While these policies are an important component of an organization’s overall security strategy, they are limited in scope. Device compliance policies cannot evaluate the risk of individual sign-ins based on user behavior, location, or anomalies in access patterns. For example, a sign-in from a new country or an unusual IP address would not be flagged solely by device compliance. Therefore, while compliance policies complement Conditional Access policies, they are insufficient on their own for mitigating high-risk sign-ins automatically. SC-300 candidates must understand that device compliance is part of a layered security approach but does not replace risk-based access controls.
C Security Defaults provide a pre-configured baseline for protecting Azure AD tenants, such as enforcing multi-factor authentication (MFA) for all users and blocking legacy authentication protocols. While Security Defaults improve the overall security posture, they lack granular control over sign-in risk or location-specific access. Security Defaults do not evaluate high-risk sign-ins in real time, cannot implement conditional access policies based on geographic location, and do not support fine-grained controls for IP addresses or sign-in behavior. In modern security environments, relying solely on Security Defaults is insufficient to prevent sophisticated threats. SC-300 candidates should recognize that while Security Defaults are helpful for general protection, they must be augmented with Conditional Access policies and risk-based controls to mitigate high-risk access effectively.
D Assigning Global Administrator privileges to users who experience high-risk sign-ins is a highly insecure practice. This approach does not mitigate the risk of compromised accounts and significantly increases the organization’s attack surface. Global Administrators have unrestricted access to all resources, so granting this role to affected users violates the principle of least privilege, which is a cornerstone of SC-300 best practices. Instead, security teams should rely on risk-based Conditional Access policies, MFA, and access reviews to protect accounts, rather than elevating privileges indiscriminately.
Question 69
You need to allow external contractors access to Teams resources for a limited time and automatically revoke access afterward. Which solution should you use?
A) Azure AD B2B collaboration with expiration settings
B) Assign permanent guest accounts without expiration
C) Share Teams files via email only
D) Grant external users full administrative privileges
Answer: A
Explanation:
A Azure Active Directory (Azure AD) Business-to-Business (B2B) collaboration allows organizations to securely provide external users with access to Microsoft 365 resources such as Teams, SharePoint, and other applications. Organizations can invite external collaborators as guest accounts and configure settings to control their access. One key feature is the ability to set expiration dates for guest accounts. This ensures that access is temporary and automatically revoked when no longer required, eliminating the need for manual intervention. This functionality is particularly useful for external contractors, consultants, or temporary project collaborators. SC-300 candidates should understand how to configure B2B invitations, enforce conditional access policies, and implement access expiration. Additionally, B2B collaboration integrates with auditing, multi-factor authentication (MFA) enforcement, and access reviews, providing full visibility into external user activity and maintaining compliance. By leveraging expiration policies, organizations maintain a controlled environment, prevent lingering access, and adhere to zero-trust security principles. Proper configuration ensures that only authorized users have access for the required duration, reducing administrative overhead and minimizing security risks.
B Assigning permanent guest accounts without expiration introduces several security risks. Over time, accounts may remain active even when the user no longer requires access, violating the principle of least privilege. Stale accounts are difficult to track, audit, and manage, increasing the likelihood of unauthorized access. Organizations that fail to implement expiration policies risk data exposure, compliance violations, and potential breaches.
C Sharing Teams files via email or other non-governed channels bypasses essential security controls, such as auditing, monitoring, and automated policy enforcement. This practice is not scalable for temporary collaboration and makes it difficult to revoke access once a project ends. Without governance, organizations lose visibility into who can access sensitive information, increasing the risk of accidental or malicious data exposure.
D Granting full administrative privileges to external contractors is a serious security violation. Such privileges expose critical resources to potential misuse, intentional or accidental, and contradict zero-trust security principles. External users should only be granted the minimum permissions necessary to perform their tasks, and access should be continuously monitored and reviewed.
Question 70
You need to ensure all new users are assigned appropriate groups and roles automatically when created. Which feature should you implement?
A) Dynamic group membership and role-based assignment policies
B) Manually assign users to groups after account creation
C) Enable Security Defaults only
D) Require MFA for all new accounts without group assignment
Answer: A
Explanation:
A Dynamic groups in Azure AD allow automatic assignment of users to groups based on attributes such as department, job title, or location. Combined with role-based access assignment policies, new users can be provisioned with correct roles and permissions automatically upon creation. This approach reduces administrative overhead, ensures consistency, and enforces least privilege principles. SC-300 candidates need to understand dynamic group rules, membership evaluation, and automated role assignment configuration, as these features are critical for scalable identity and access management. By using dynamic group membership, organizations can maintain compliance, reduce errors, and improve security posture. Automation ensures that users receive appropriate access from day one while enabling access reviews and auditing for governance.
B Manually assigning users to groups is inefficient and error-prone. It increases administrative effort and the potential for misconfiguration, which can lead to security gaps or privilege creep.
C Security Defaults only enforce basic authentication and MFA policies. They do not provide dynamic user assignment to groups or automated role provisioning, making them insufficient for enterprise-scale identity management.
D Requiring MFA for new accounts enhances security but does not address group membership or role assignments. MFA alone cannot automate access provisioning or enforce least privilege policies.
Question 71
You need to ensure that users can access specific Azure resources only if their devices are compliant with organizational policies. Which solution should you implement?
A) Conditional Access with device compliance requirement
B) Assign permanent Global Administrator roles
C) Enable Security Defaults without device checks
D) Require MFA for all users only
Answer: A
Explanation:
A Conditional Access with device compliance requirements is the optimal solution for ensuring that only secure and approved devices can access Azure resources. By integrating Azure AD Conditional Access with Intune device compliance policies, administrators can enforce rules that evaluate device status before granting access. These rules can check for operating system versions, encryption status, threat protection, and the presence of required security configurations. This method aligns with zero-trust security principles, emphasizing the need to validate devices alongside user credentials. For SC-300 exam candidates, understanding how to configure Conditional Access policies, assign device compliance policies, and monitor enforcement is essential. The solution allows administrators to create granular access controls based on risk, device state, location, or user group. Additionally, it provides detailed logging and auditing, enabling organizations to meet compliance requirements and detect unauthorized access attempts. By implementing this solution, organizations can significantly reduce security risks associated with unmanaged or non-compliant devices.
B Assigning permanent Global Administrator roles provides unrestricted access regardless of device compliance. This violates the principle of least privilege and can expose critical resources to insecure devices. Such a method does not address compliance requirements and is unsuitable for enterprise environments.
C Security Defaults offer basic protections like MFA and blocking legacy authentication, but they cannot enforce device-specific access controls. Without device evaluation, there is no guarantee that only compliant devices will access resources, making it insufficient for high-security scenarios.
D Requiring MFA alone improves authentication security but does not restrict access based on device state. Non-compliant or insecure devices could still access sensitive resources, leaving the organization vulnerable to threats. Conditional Access with device compliance provides a more comprehensive security solution.
Question 72
You need to monitor all sign-in attempts and detect unusual or risky behavior. Which Azure AD feature should you configure?
A) Azure AD Identity Protection
B) Device compliance policies only
C) Security Defaults without monitoring
D) Assign Global Administrator roles for oversight
Answer: A
Explanation:
A Azure AD Identity Protection is designed to continuously monitor sign-ins and evaluate risk levels using machine learning, behavioral analytics, and threat intelligence. It identifies suspicious activity such as sign-ins from unusual locations, anonymous IP addresses, leaked credentials, or atypical user behavior. Administrators can configure policies to automatically respond to risky sign-ins, including requiring MFA, blocking access, or forcing password resets. SC-300 exam candidates must understand risk-based policies, sign-in risk evaluation, and automated remediation techniques. This feature integrates with Conditional Access, allowing conditional enforcement actions based on risk, such as blocking access to critical applications when risk is high. Identity Protection also provides auditing and reporting tools, making it a vital component of enterprise security and compliance strategies. By using Azure AD Identity Protection, organizations reduce the likelihood of account compromise while maintaining operational efficiency and adhering to zero-trust principles.
B Device compliance policies are important for securing endpoints but cannot detect risky sign-ins or evaluate behavioral patterns. They ensure devices meet security standards but do not provide automated monitoring or real-time response to identity threats.
C Security Defaults offer baseline protections, including enforcing MFA and blocking legacy authentication, but they do not analyze risk or provide detailed monitoring for unusual behavior. Without risk-based evaluation, suspicious activities may go undetected.
D Assigning Global Administrator roles does not inherently provide monitoring capabilities. Administrators with elevated privileges can perform oversight, but this is a reactive approach and does not automatically detect or respond to risky sign-ins.
Question 73
You need to ensure external vendors can access corporate Teams channels only for a defined period. Which method should you implement?
A) Azure AD B2B collaboration with expiration policies
B) Assign permanent guest accounts
C) Share files through email only
D) Grant external users administrative rights
Answer: A
Explanation:
A Azure AD B2B collaboration allows organizations to invite external users to Teams channels, SharePoint sites, or other Microsoft 365 resources. By configuring access expiration policies, guest accounts can automatically be removed after a specified period, ensuring temporary access aligns with business needs. SC-300 exam candidates should understand the configuration of B2B invitations, conditional access for external users, and the application of access expiration settings. This approach minimizes administrative overhead while maintaining security. B2B collaboration integrates with MFA, auditing, and access reviews, helping organizations meet compliance standards and ensuring zero-trust principles are enforced. Expiration policies prevent lingering accounts, reducing the risk of unauthorized access after the contractual period ends. Automated revocation ensures that security posture is maintained without requiring constant manual intervention from IT administrators.
B Assigning permanent guest accounts leaves accounts active indefinitely, which increases the risk of stale or unnecessary access. Permanent accounts violate least privilege principles and can complicate auditing and compliance efforts.
C Sharing files via email is insecure and bypasses governance policies. It cannot enforce conditional access, MFA, or auditing, leaving sensitive data exposed to uncontrolled distribution.
D Granting administrative rights to external vendors is an extreme security risk. External users should never be given full administrative privileges, as this would violate security best practices and expose critical systems to potential compromise.
Question 74
You need to enforce multi-factor authentication only for high-risk sign-ins while allowing normal access otherwise. Which solution should you implement?
A) Conditional Access policies integrated with Azure AD Identity Protection
B) Require MFA for all users globally
C) Enable Security Defaults without risk evaluation
D) Assign administrative roles to users for manual oversight
Answer: A
Explanation:
A Conditional Access policies integrated with Azure AD Identity Protection enable organizations to enforce MFA selectively based on sign-in risk. High-risk activities, such as sign-ins from unusual locations or devices, trigger MFA requirements, while low-risk sign-ins proceed without interruption. This method optimizes security while maintaining user convenience, supporting zero-trust and least privilege principles. SC-300 candidates should understand how to configure risk-based Conditional Access policies, including risk levels, triggers, actions, and monitoring. Integration with Azure AD Identity Protection provides automated threat detection, auditing, and reporting. By using this solution, organizations can reduce exposure to credential compromise and provide adaptive security that responds to dynamic threats. Automated enforcement of MFA based on risk ensures secure access without unnecessary friction for low-risk users, supporting operational efficiency and compliance objectives.
B Requiring MFA for all users globally increases security but may disrupt productivity, as low-risk users are forced to perform MFA unnecessarily. It does not leverage risk-based evaluation for adaptive security.
C Security Defaults provide general MFA enforcement but cannot differentiate between high- and low-risk sign-ins. Without risk evaluation, there is no selective or adaptive response to suspicious activity.
D Assigning administrative roles for manual oversight is inefficient and reactive. It does not automatically enforce MFA based on risk and relies heavily on human intervention, leaving windows of vulnerability.
Question 75
You need to automatically assign users to appropriate groups and roles based on department and location attributes. Which feature should you use?
A) Dynamic groups with attribute-based rules
B) Manually assign groups after account creation
C) Enable Security Defaults only
D) Require MFA without role assignment
Answer: A
Explanation:
A Dynamic groups in Azure AD allow automatic membership based on user attributes, such as department, job title, or geographic location. By combining dynamic group membership with role-based access assignments, administrators can ensure that users receive the correct permissions immediately upon creation. This automation reduces administrative overhead, enforces consistency, and aligns with least privilege principles. SC-300 exam candidates should be familiar with creating dynamic membership rules, evaluating attribute expressions, and assigning roles through policy-based access control. Dynamic groups also integrate with access reviews and auditing, ensuring compliance with internal policies and regulatory frameworks. Using dynamic assignments ensures that users have access only to what is necessary based on their organizational context, preventing privilege creep and minimizing security risks. This method provides scalable identity management, allowing organizations to maintain security, compliance, and operational efficiency without manual intervention for every new user.
B Manually assigning users to groups is inefficient, prone to errors, and does not scale effectively for large organizations. It increases the risk of inconsistent permissions and privilege creep, which can compromise security.
C Security Defaults enforce MFA and baseline protections but cannot manage dynamic group membership or role assignment. They are insufficient for automated provisioning and identity governance.
D Requiring MFA improves authentication security but does not assign roles or groups automatically. Without dynamic assignments, users may not receive appropriate access, which reduces efficiency and compliance.
Question 76
You need to configure a solution to require approval for temporary administrative role activation. Which Azure feature should you implement?
A) Privileged Identity Management (PIM)
B) Assign permanent Global Administrator roles
C) Enable Security Defaults
D) Use device compliance policies
Answer: A
Explanation:
A Privileged Identity Management (PIM) is specifically designed to manage, control, and monitor privileged roles in Azure AD. PIM allows just-in-time role activation, which means users are assigned eligible roles but must activate them for a limited period, often requiring approval. This ensures that administrative privileges are not always active, adhering to the principle of least privilege and reducing security risks associated with permanently assigned admin roles. SC-300 candidates need to understand how to configure PIM settings such as activation duration, approval workflows, MFA enforcement, and notification alerts for administrators. PIM also provides auditing and reporting capabilities, enabling organizations to track which administrators have activated roles, for how long, and for what purpose. Using PIM, organizations can enforce governance policies while minimizing the attack surface and reducing the likelihood of insider threats or credential compromise.
B Assigning permanent Global Administrator roles is inherently insecure. It provides unlimited access to resources without approval, does not enforce time-bound activation, and violates the principle of least privilege. This approach significantly increases the risk of misuse or compromise.
C Enabling Security Defaults provides baseline security measures such as MFA enforcement and blocking legacy authentication, but it does not manage privileged role activation or require approval for temporary access. It cannot replace the governance capabilities offered by PIM.
D Device compliance policies ensure endpoints meet organizational security requirements but do not control or restrict administrative role activation. While useful for endpoint security, they do not address privileged access management.
Question 77
You need to block sign-ins from high-risk locations while allowing normal access elsewhere. Which feature should you implement?
A) Conditional Access with sign-in risk policies
B) Device compliance policies only
C) Security Defaults without location evaluation
D) Assign Global Administrator roles for manual control
Answer: A
Explanation:
A Conditional Access policies combined with Azure AD Identity Protection enable organizations to block or restrict access based on sign-in risk, including location-based evaluation. This feature allows administrators to define policies that evaluate user behavior, IP addresses, geographical location, and other risk signals in real time. SC-300 candidates should understand how to configure these policies, set risk thresholds, and assign appropriate actions, such as blocking access, requiring MFA, or initiating a password reset for high-risk sign-ins. Location-based risk evaluation is crucial for organizations operating globally, as it ensures that access from unusual or suspicious regions is mitigated while legitimate users experience minimal disruption. Conditional Access policies also provide logging, reporting, and auditing capabilities, supporting compliance and continuous monitoring. This proactive approach aligns with zero-trust principles, continuously assessing user and device risk before granting access.
B Device compliance policies are essential for endpoint security but cannot detect or block high-risk sign-ins based on user location or behavior. They provide a complementary control but are insufficient for proactive access management.
C Security Defaults enforce baseline protections like MFA and blocking legacy authentication but lack granularity and cannot evaluate risk based on geographical or behavioral factors. Without Conditional Access, high-risk sign-ins cannot be automatically blocked.
D Assigning Global Administrator roles for manual oversight is not a practical solution. It introduces administrative burden, is reactive rather than proactive, and does not provide automated risk mitigation.
Question 78
You need to grant external contractors temporary access to Microsoft Teams channels and revoke access automatically. Which method should you use?
A) Azure AD B2B collaboration with expiration settings
B) Assign permanent guest accounts
C) Share files via email only
D) Grant administrative privileges to external users
Answer: A
Explanation:
A Azure AD B2B collaboration is specifically designed for managing external users, including contractors, partners, or temporary collaborators. By enabling expiration policies, guest accounts can be automatically removed after a specified duration, ensuring access is temporary and aligned with contractual agreements. SC-300 exam candidates must understand how to configure B2B invitations, set expiration periods, and apply conditional access policies to external accounts. This approach reduces administrative overhead, ensures compliance, and maintains a secure environment for temporary collaboration. B2B collaboration integrates with MFA, auditing, and access reviews, providing full visibility into external user activity and access patterns. Using expiration policies prevents lingering accounts, minimizes insider threats, and enforces zero-trust security principles by ensuring that external users have access only for as long as necessary.
B Assigning permanent guest accounts increases security risks because accounts remain active indefinitely, potentially leading to unauthorized access after the collaboration period ends. Permanent accounts violate the principle of least privilege and complicate auditing.
C Sharing files via email bypasses governance and auditing, making it insecure for collaboration. It does not provide automatic revocation of access or enforce organizational policies for external users.
D Granting administrative privileges to external users is an extreme security risk. External contractors should never have elevated privileges, as this exposes sensitive resources to potential misuse or compromise.
Question 79
You need to enforce MFA only for high-risk sign-ins while allowing normal access without additional steps. Which solution should you use?
A) Conditional Access with Azure AD Identity Protection
B) Require MFA for all users globally
C) Enable Security Defaults without risk evaluation
D) Assign administrative roles for manual MFA enforcement
Answer: A
Explanation:
A Conditional Access policies integrated with Azure AD Identity Protection allow organizations to enforce adaptive MFA based on risk signals. High-risk sign-ins trigger MFA, while low-risk sign-ins proceed without interruption, balancing security and user convenience. SC-300 candidates should be familiar with configuring Conditional Access conditions, risk levels, and actions for automated enforcement. The solution detects anomalies such as unusual locations, unfamiliar devices, or impossible travel patterns and requires MFA only when the risk is significant. This approach supports zero-trust principles by continuously evaluating the legitimacy of sign-ins and taking automated protective measures. Automated adaptive MFA reduces the attack surface without creating unnecessary friction for legitimate users, enhances compliance, and allows auditing and reporting of security events for accountability and monitoring purposes.
B Requiring MFA for all users is effective for basic security but forces low-risk users to perform MFA unnecessarily, potentially impacting productivity. It does not provide adaptive risk-based enforcement.
C Security Defaults enforce baseline MFA and block legacy authentication but do not differentiate between high- and low-risk sign-ins. Without risk evaluation, it cannot provide selective, adaptive security.
D Assigning administrative roles to manage MFA manually is inefficient and reactive. It does not automate enforcement and leaves windows of vulnerability while administrators intervene.
Question 80
You need to automatically assign users to groups and roles based on department, job title, and location attributes. Which feature should you implement?
A) Dynamic groups with attribute-based rules
B) Manually assign groups after account creation
C) Enable Security Defaults only
D) Require MFA without group assignment
Answer: A
Explanation:
A Dynamic groups in Azure AD provide the ability to automatically assign users to groups based on attributes like department, job title, and geographic location. This automation ensures that users receive appropriate roles and permissions immediately upon account creation, reducing administrative overhead, enforcing consistency, and adhering to the principle of least privilege. SC-300 exam candidates should understand how to define dynamic membership rules, evaluate user attributes, and integrate with role-based access assignments. Dynamic groups also integrate with access reviews, compliance monitoring, and auditing, ensuring that users maintain only the access they require and preventing privilege creep. By leveraging dynamic assignments, organizations can efficiently manage identity and access at scale, enhance security, and reduce the risk of misconfigured permissions. Automated role and group assignments also support operational efficiency, compliance reporting, and governance standards, making them critical for enterprise identity management strategies.
B Manually assigning users to groups is time-consuming, error-prone, and does not scale well. It can lead to inconsistent permissions, privilege creep, and increased administrative burden.
C Security Defaults enforce basic protections like MFA but do not handle dynamic group membership or automatic role assignment, making them insufficient for scalable identity management.
D Requiring MFA enhances authentication security but does not automate group membership or role assignments. Without dynamic rules, users may not receive appropriate access, reducing operational efficiency and governance.
