Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance Functional Consultant MB-310 Practice Test 35
Question 340
In Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance, journal users repeatedly mistype the account-and-dimension combination for a routine accrual posting. Which configuration or processing change best resolves the issue?
- Configure a ledger account alias that resolves to the approved ledger account and dimensions.
- Enable and map the proper payable transactions in cash-flow forecast setup and automation.
- Configure the financial report filters to explicitly include the intended posting layers.
- Align budget dimensions and main account scope with the relevant ledger actuals.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:The relevant Microsoft MB-310 skill group is 'Design and configure the chart of accounts and financial dimensions'. The control or accounting problem is: Journal users repeatedly mistype the account-and-dimension combination for a routine accrual posting. The corrective choice Configure a ledger account alias that resolves to the approved ledger account and dimensions. addresses this exact failure rather than an unrelated process. Confirm it through: Entering the alias produces the intended account combination in a validated test journal.
Incorrect Answers
B:This choice belongs to a different Dynamics 365 Finance problem: A cash flow forecast ignores scheduled vendor payments because the forecast setup excludes the accounts-payable source. It does not address the defining failure in this scenario: Journal users repeatedly mistype the account-and-dimension combination for a routine accrual posting. Here the targeted correction is Configure a ledger account alias that resolves to the approved ledger account and dimensions.
C:This choice belongs to a different Dynamics 365 Finance problem: An automated finance report accidentally mixes current-layer operational postings with tax-layer adjustments. It does not address the defining failure in this scenario: Journal users repeatedly mistype the account-and-dimension combination for a routine accrual posting. Here the targeted correction is Configure a ledger account alias that resolves to the approved ledger account and dimensions.
D:This choice belongs to a different Dynamics 365 Finance problem: A project budget report uses an inappropriate main-account mapping so actual payroll expense is excluded. It does not address the defining failure in this scenario: Journal users repeatedly mistype the account-and-dimension combination for a routine accrual posting. Here the targeted correction is Configure a ledger account alias that resolves to the approved ledger account and dimensions.
Question 341
A Dynamics 365 Finance case begins with this issue: A product requires a reduced statutory tax rate but its item tax group points to the standard rate code. After the targeted correction, which result best verifies the required outcome?
- A posted expense can be filtered reliably by the required dimension rather than parsed from narration.
- The new fiscal opening balance reconciles to audited retained earnings and balance carryforwards.
- A sample invoice calculates the approved reduced rate and posts the expected liability.
- A completed approved milestone generates its invoice once and a pending milestone does not.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:This case starts with: A product requires a reduced statutory tax rate but its item tax group points to the standard rate code. Once the targeted action Assign the correct item sales tax group and validated tax code for the taxable item. has been completed, the decisive acceptance evidence is A sample invoice calculates the approved reduced rate and posts the expected liability. The verification tests the business/ledger result rather than trusting a successful workflow status alone.
Incorrect Answers
A:“A posted expense can be filtered reliably by the required dimension rather than parsed from narration” verifies the separate Finance condition An operations team uses a free-text ledger description to substitute for a required reporting dimension on all expense postings. The present issue is A product requires a reduced statutory tax rate but its item tax group points to the standard rate code; the necessary acceptance evidence is “A sample invoice calculates the approved reduced rate and posts the expected liability”, not the alternate observation.
B:“The new fiscal opening balance reconciles to audited retained earnings and balance carryforwards” verifies the separate Finance condition A year-end retained-earnings opening balance differs from the audited prior-year closing statement. The present issue is A product requires a reduced statutory tax rate but its item tax group points to the standard rate code; the necessary acceptance evidence is “A sample invoice calculates the approved reduced rate and posts the expected liability”, not the alternate observation.
D:“A completed approved milestone generates its invoice once and a pending milestone does not” verifies the separate Finance condition An approved milestone invoice remains absent because the system monitors the wrong milestone status field. The present issue is A product requires a reduced statutory tax rate but its item tax group points to the standard rate code; the necessary acceptance evidence is “A sample invoice calculates the approved reduced rate and posts the expected liability”, not the alternate observation.
Question 342
A Dynamics 365 Finance case begins with this issue: Accounting currency and reporting currency are mistakenly reversed in a newly configured legal entity. After the targeted correction, which result best verifies the required outcome?
- The completed reconciliation difference is zero with evidence for every adjustment.
- Manual journal vouchers use the designated unique series without colliding with imported entries.
- The sample voucher reports local and group amounts in the proper currency columns.
- The supplier balance decreases and the transaction references the credited invoice.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:This case starts with: Accounting currency and reporting currency are mistakenly reversed in a newly configured legal entity. Once the targeted action Correct ledger currency assignments before transactional adoption and reconcile the test posting. has been completed, the decisive acceptance evidence is The sample voucher reports local and group amounts in the proper currency columns. The verification tests the business/ledger result rather than trusting a successful workflow status alone.
Incorrect Answers
A:“The completed reconciliation difference is zero with evidence for every adjustment” verifies the separate Finance condition A monthly bank reconciliation balances only because an accountant enters an unexplained manual difference adjustment. The present issue is Accounting currency and reporting currency are mistakenly reversed in a newly configured legal entity; the necessary acceptance evidence is “The sample voucher reports local and group amounts in the proper currency columns”, not the alternate observation.
B:“Manual journal vouchers use the designated unique series without colliding with imported entries” verifies the separate Finance condition A finance clerk creates a manual general-ledger journal with a voucher sequence shared by an unrelated high-volume import. The present issue is Accounting currency and reporting currency are mistakenly reversed in a newly configured legal entity; the necessary acceptance evidence is “The sample voucher reports local and group amounts in the proper currency columns”, not the alternate observation.
D:“The supplier balance decreases and the transaction references the credited invoice” verifies the separate Finance condition A supplier issues a credit memo for returned materials but finance posts a second positive vendor invoice. The present issue is Accounting currency and reporting currency are mistakenly reversed in a newly configured legal entity; the necessary acceptance evidence is “The sample voucher reports local and group amounts in the proper currency columns”, not the alternate observation.
Question 343
In Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance, a prepaid software expense is booked in full this month although benefits span twelve months. Which configuration or processing change best resolves the issue?
- Match the payment to the correct open invoice and execute the supported AR settlement.
- Assign the proper customer payment method and supported processing configuration.
- Configure an expense deferral schedule over the coverage period.
- Validate debit and credit totals on one journal voucher before posting.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:The relevant Microsoft MB-310 skill group is 'Configure and manage subscription billing'. The control or accounting problem is: A prepaid software expense is booked in full this month although benefits span twelve months. The corrective choice Configure an expense deferral schedule over the coverage period. addresses this exact failure rather than an unrelated process. Confirm it through: The prepaid asset reduces each month with corresponding scheduled expense recognition.
Incorrect Answers
A:This choice belongs to a different Dynamics 365 Finance problem: A customer payment is imported without its transaction reference and the open invoice remains unsettled. It does not address the defining failure in this scenario: A prepaid software expense is booked in full this month although benefits span twelve months. Here the targeted correction is Configure an expense deferral schedule over the coverage period.
B:This choice belongs to a different Dynamics 365 Finance problem: A customer requests card payments but its selected payment method still requires manual bank transfer data. It does not address the defining failure in this scenario: A prepaid software expense is booked in full this month although benefits span twelve months. Here the targeted correction is Configure an expense deferral schedule over the coverage period.
D:This choice belongs to a different Dynamics 365 Finance problem: Staff enter separate debit and credit vouchers when the policy requires a single balanced manual transaction. It does not address the defining failure in this scenario: A prepaid software expense is booked in full this month although benefits span twelve months. Here the targeted correction is Configure an expense deferral schedule over the coverage period.
Question 344
A Dynamics 365 Finance case begins with this issue: A budget control check considers only posted actuals and ignores open purchase commitments. After the targeted correction, which result best verifies the required outcome?
- The same requisition displays correct remaining funds after considering outstanding commitments.
- Allocated budgets follow the tested business-unit revenue proportions.
- One department's budget decreases and the other increases without changing total approved funds.
- The next recurrence produces expected customer invoices once per period.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:This case starts with: A budget control check considers only posted actuals and ignores open purchase commitments. Once the targeted action Configure funds-available calculation to include the authorized encumbrances and commitments. has been completed, the decisive acceptance evidence is The same requisition displays correct remaining funds after considering outstanding commitments. The verification tests the business/ledger result rather than trusting a successful workflow status alone.
Incorrect Answers
B:“Allocated budgets follow the tested business-unit revenue proportions” verifies the separate Finance condition A budget allocation distributes shared overhead equally although the board approved a revenue-weighted formula. The present issue is A budget control check considers only posted actuals and ignores open purchase commitments; the necessary acceptance evidence is “The same requisition displays correct remaining funds after considering outstanding commitments”, not the alternate observation.
C:“One department's budget decreases and the other increases without changing total approved funds” verifies the separate Finance condition A budget transfer from sales to operations appears as new total spending authority rather than a transfer. The present issue is A budget control check considers only posted actuals and ignores open purchase commitments; the necessary acceptance evidence is “The same requisition displays correct remaining funds after considering outstanding commitments”, not the alternate observation.
D:“The next recurrence produces expected customer invoices once per period” verifies the separate Finance condition A monthly membership fee is entered by hand and some customer cycles are missed. The present issue is A budget control check considers only posted actuals and ignores open purchase commitments; the necessary acceptance evidence is “The same requisition displays correct remaining funds after considering outstanding commitments”, not the alternate observation.
Question 345
In Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance, a vendor payment method references an obsolete bank export format and the payment file is rejected. Which configuration or processing change best resolves the issue?
- Assign the currently approved vendor payment method and bank export format.
- Configure the mileage expense category and reimbursement rate policy.
- Configure evidence requirements and expense policy enforcement for the category.
- Update the budget planning organization hierarchy and workflow responsibilities.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:The relevant Microsoft MB-310 skill group is 'Implement and manage accounts payable'. The control or accounting problem is: A vendor payment method references an obsolete bank export format and the payment file is rejected. The corrective choice Assign the currently approved vendor payment method and bank export format. addresses this exact failure rather than an unrelated process. Confirm it through: A generated vendor payment file passes the destination bank's validation.
Incorrect Answers
B:This choice belongs to a different Dynamics 365 Finance problem: Mileage reimbursement is calculated using a flat per-diem rate rather than the permitted distance-based rate. It does not address the defining failure in this scenario: A vendor payment method references an obsolete bank export format and the payment file is rejected. Here the targeted correction is Assign the currently approved vendor payment method and bank export format.
C:This choice belongs to a different Dynamics 365 Finance problem: An expense report includes a missing receipt but policy requires evidence for claims above a threshold. It does not address the defining failure in this scenario: A vendor payment method references an obsolete bank export format and the payment file is rejected. Here the targeted correction is Assign the currently approved vendor payment method and bank export format.
D:This choice belongs to a different Dynamics 365 Finance problem: A planning process routes department proposals to the wrong approvers after the organization hierarchy changes. It does not address the defining failure in this scenario: A vendor payment method references an obsolete bank export format and the payment file is rejected. Here the targeted correction is Assign the currently approved vendor payment method and bank export format.
Question 346
A Dynamics 365 Finance case begins with this issue: A year-end retained-earnings opening balance differs from the audited prior-year closing statement. After the targeted correction, which result best verifies the required outcome?
- The special project account validates with funding source while unrelated accounts retain their existing structure.
- A controlled voucher produces the appropriate accounting and reporting currency amounts.
- The new fiscal opening balance reconciles to audited retained earnings and balance carryforwards.
- Available funds increase by the canceled commitment without changing actual expenditure.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:This case starts with: A year-end retained-earnings opening balance differs from the audited prior-year closing statement. Once the targeted action Compare year-end closing settings, account mappings and any adjustment postings before rerunning close. has been completed, the decisive acceptance evidence is The new fiscal opening balance reconciles to audited retained earnings and balance carryforwards. The verification tests the business/ledger result rather than trusting a successful workflow status alone.
Incorrect Answers
A:“The special project account validates with funding source while unrelated accounts retain their existing structure” verifies the separate Finance condition An account structure admits only two dimensions but a special project expense needs an additional funding-source dimension. The present issue is A year-end retained-earnings opening balance differs from the audited prior-year closing statement; the necessary acceptance evidence is “The new fiscal opening balance reconciles to audited retained earnings and balance carryforwards”, not the alternate observation.
B:“A controlled voucher produces the appropriate accounting and reporting currency amounts” verifies the separate Finance condition A new reporting currency is required but finance assumes it can be selected without configuring the ledger's currencies. The present issue is A year-end retained-earnings opening balance differs from the audited prior-year closing statement; the necessary acceptance evidence is “The new fiscal opening balance reconciles to audited retained earnings and balance carryforwards”, not the alternate observation.
D:“Available funds increase by the canceled commitment without changing actual expenditure” verifies the separate Finance condition A purchase order triggers a negative available-budget warning after a previous canceled requisition still consumes funds. The present issue is A year-end retained-earnings opening balance differs from the audited prior-year closing statement; the necessary acceptance evidence is “The new fiscal opening balance reconciles to audited retained earnings and balance carryforwards”, not the alternate observation.
Question 347
A Dynamics 365 Finance case begins with this issue: A project purchase is incorrectly exempt because a blanket customer exemption is applied outside its legal scope. After the targeted correction, which result best verifies the required outcome?
- Each entity closes and reports its periods on its required year-end boundary.
- Ineligible purchases accrue tax while approved exempt transactions remain exempt.
- Eligible transactions are selected in the centralized payment process with correct source-entity accounting.
- The same requisition displays correct remaining funds after considering outstanding commitments.
Explanation
Correct Answer
B:This case starts with: A project purchase is incorrectly exempt because a blanket customer exemption is applied outside its legal scope. Once the targeted action Restrict exemption applicability to the authorized tax code and qualifying transactions. has been completed, the decisive acceptance evidence is Ineligible purchases accrue tax while approved exempt transactions remain exempt. The verification tests the business/ledger result rather than trusting a successful workflow status alone.
Incorrect Answers
A:“Each entity closes and reports its periods on its required year-end boundary” verifies the separate Finance condition Finance uses one ledger calendar across entities with different statutory year ends without documenting exception handling. The present issue is A project purchase is incorrectly exempt because a blanket customer exemption is applied outside its legal scope; the necessary acceptance evidence is “Ineligible purchases accrue tax while approved exempt transactions remain exempt”, not the alternate observation.
C:“Eligible transactions are selected in the centralized payment process with correct source-entity accounting” verifies the separate Finance condition An AR and AP settlement needs one authorized shared payment process but two entities maintain incompatible bank payment setups. The present issue is A project purchase is incorrectly exempt because a blanket customer exemption is applied outside its legal scope; the necessary acceptance evidence is “Ineligible purchases accrue tax while approved exempt transactions remain exempt”, not the alternate observation.
D:“The same requisition displays correct remaining funds after considering outstanding commitments” verifies the separate Finance condition A budget control check considers only posted actuals and ignores open purchase commitments. The present issue is A project purchase is incorrectly exempt because a blanket customer exemption is applied outside its legal scope; the necessary acceptance evidence is “Ineligible purchases accrue tax while approved exempt transactions remain exempt”, not the alternate observation.
Question 348
In Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance, a quarterly software contract is invoiced once in full although the client agreement requires monthly billing documents. Which configuration or processing change best resolves the issue?
- Match the payment to the correct open invoice and execute the supported AR settlement.
- Use the approved sales credit-note process against the original transaction.
- Assign the correct customer or vendor payment method and bank-format requirements for the wire.
- Configure a billing schedule with the intended frequency and generate monthly sales documents.
Explanation
Correct Answer
D:The relevant Microsoft MB-310 skill group is 'Configure and manage subscription billing'. The control or accounting problem is: A quarterly software contract is invoiced once in full although the client agreement requires monthly billing documents. The corrective choice Configure a billing schedule with the intended frequency and generate monthly sales documents. addresses this exact failure rather than an unrelated process. Confirm it through: The next three periods produce the expected monthly invoices instead of one quarterly invoice.
Incorrect Answers
A:This choice belongs to a different Dynamics 365 Finance problem: A customer payment is imported without its transaction reference and the open invoice remains unsettled. It does not address the defining failure in this scenario: A quarterly software contract is invoiced once in full although the client agreement requires monthly billing documents. Here the targeted correction is Configure a billing schedule with the intended frequency and generate monthly sales documents.
B:This choice belongs to a different Dynamics 365 Finance problem: A returned sales order product needs a credit memo but staff post another positive invoice. It does not address the defining failure in this scenario: A quarterly software contract is invoiced once in full although the client agreement requires monthly billing documents. Here the targeted correction is Configure a billing schedule with the intended frequency and generate monthly sales documents.
C:This choice belongs to a different Dynamics 365 Finance problem: A payment method configured for domestic ACH is applied to an international wire payment needing different bank details. It does not address the defining failure in this scenario: A quarterly software contract is invoiced once in full although the client agreement requires monthly billing documents. Here the targeted correction is Configure a billing schedule with the intended frequency and generate monthly sales documents.
Question 349
In Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance, an accountant reverses a posted accrual by entering a second manual journal that accidentally uses the wrong sign. Which configuration or processing change best resolves the issue?
- Design one governed shared chart-of-accounts main account and use entity-appropriate dimensions to distinguish clearing activity.
- Configure the required elimination postings for the relevant intercompany balances and transactions.
- Use the supported transaction reversal process with reviewed reversal date and voucher references.
- Correct the budget report's dimension hierarchy and model selections.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:The relevant Microsoft MB-310 skill group is 'Implement and manage journals'. The control or accounting problem is: An accountant reverses a posted accrual by entering a second manual journal that accidentally uses the wrong sign. The corrective choice Use the supported transaction reversal process with reviewed reversal date and voucher references. addresses this exact failure rather than an unrelated process. Confirm it through: The reversal offsets the original entries and the audit trail links both voucher records.
Incorrect Answers
A:This choice belongs to a different Dynamics 365 Finance problem: The same main account code has been added twice for near-identical clearing purposes across entities. It does not address the defining failure in this scenario: An accountant reverses a posted accrual by entering a second manual journal that accidentally uses the wrong sign. Here the targeted correction is Use the supported transaction reversal process with reviewed reversal date and voucher references.
B:This choice belongs to a different Dynamics 365 Finance problem: A consolidation of two reporting entities retains unrealized intra-group profit from intercompany transactions. It does not address the defining failure in this scenario: An accountant reverses a posted accrual by entering a second manual journal that accidentally uses the wrong sign. Here the targeted correction is Use the supported transaction reversal process with reviewed reversal date and voucher references.
D:This choice belongs to a different Dynamics 365 Finance problem: A budget-to-actual report uses a dimension hierarchy that groups two distinct business units together. It does not address the defining failure in this scenario: An accountant reverses a posted accrual by entering a second manual journal that accidentally uses the wrong sign. Here the targeted correction is Use the supported transaction reversal process with reviewed reversal date and voucher references.
Question 350
A Dynamics 365 Finance case begins with this issue: Credit management blocks a sales order after an unrelated customer credit memo remains unsettled. After the targeted correction, which result best verifies the required outcome?
- The intended invoice is marked settled and the unmatched payment balance is removed.
- A generated invoice line uses the authorized billing item and revenue account.
- Credit exposure reflects the properly settled credit and the order is reassessed accurately.
- A dated currency-rate lookup returns one intended value and revaluation uses it consistently.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:This case starts with: Credit management blocks a sales order after an unrelated customer credit memo remains unsettled. Once the targeted action Review customer's open balances and settle valid credits before re-running the exposure check. has been completed, the decisive acceptance evidence is Credit exposure reflects the properly settled credit and the order is reassessed accurately. The verification tests the business/ledger result rather than trusting a successful workflow status alone.
Incorrect Answers
A:“The intended invoice is marked settled and the unmatched payment balance is removed” verifies the separate Finance condition A customer payment is imported without its transaction reference and the open invoice remains unsettled. The present issue is Credit management blocks a sales order after an unrelated customer credit memo remains unsettled; the necessary acceptance evidence is “Credit exposure reflects the properly settled credit and the order is reassessed accurately”, not the alternate observation.
B:“A generated invoice line uses the authorized billing item and revenue account” verifies the separate Finance condition A subscription group is assigned the wrong item group and the invoice posts using an unintended revenue account. The present issue is Credit management blocks a sales order after an unrelated customer credit memo remains unsettled; the necessary acceptance evidence is “Credit exposure reflects the properly settled credit and the order is reassessed accurately”, not the alternate observation.
D:“A dated currency-rate lookup returns one intended value and revaluation uses it consistently” verifies the separate Finance condition An exchange-rate table has duplicate provider feeds and month-end rates are selected unpredictably. The present issue is Credit management blocks a sales order after an unrelated customer credit memo remains unsettled; the necessary acceptance evidence is “Credit exposure reflects the properly settled credit and the order is reassessed accurately”, not the alternate observation.