Cisco Certified Support Technician (CCST) Networking 100-150 Practice Test 95
Question 940
Before approving the action, review: At the fictional Lakebridge Travel Office before a planned system change, the team observes: A support engineer investigates an unauthorized router change but the system logs no record of which administrator made it. During “Enable authorized management activity logging and retain the appropriate audit records.”, which precaution MOST specifically prevents a related risk?
- Do not equate an HTTP-only deny rule with a blanket ban on HTTPS services.
- Do not open all inbound ports merely to allow responses to established requests.
- Do not use shared unlogged administrator accounts when action accountability is required.
- Do not assume a strong WPA passphrase means all alternative onboarding paths are automatically disabled.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:Correct. This precaution prevents a second fault while applying “Enable authorized management activity logging and retain the appropriate audit records.” at the fictional Lakebridge Travel Office. The required protection is “Do not use shared unlogged administrator accounts when action accountability is required.”; success still requires “A test configuration change is attributed to the correct user and time.”.
Incorrect Answers
A:This caution is appropriate for a separate failure pattern: A team blocks TCP port 80 but claims that every possible web application is unreachable even though HTTPS uses TCP 443. The principal adjacent risk here is controlled by “Do not use shared unlogged administrator accounts when action accountability is required.”.
B:This caution is appropriate for a separate failure pattern: A branch firewall permits DNS queries to a resolver but blocks corresponding response packets because the team treats every return packet as a new unrelated inbound flow. The principal adjacent risk here is controlled by “Do not use shared unlogged administrator accounts when action accountability is required.”.
D:This caution is appropriate for a separate failure pattern: A user configures a wireless router with a secure password but leaves WPS push-button or PIN onboarding unrestricted despite a policy requiring it off. The principal adjacent risk here is controlled by “Do not use shared unlogged administrator accounts when action accountability is required.”.
Question 941
A technician reviews the following issue: At the fictional Cedar Valley Academy in a technician onboarding review, the team observes: A user authenticates to a critical application with a shared dictionary password and a security question, and the team calls that strong multifactor authentication. Which action MOST directly resolves the reported issue?
- Test a documented WPA2-AES compatibility SSID or isolate the legacy device while keeping strong security on other WLANs.
- Require an approved complex unique password and a separate supported factor such as an authenticator or hardware security key.
- Review and test the actual allowed HTTPS and blocked HTTP traffic separately.
- Verify whether the rule covers UDP, TCP or both for the specified destination port.
Explanation
Correct Answer
B:Correct. In the fictional Cedar Valley Academy case, Strong unique password policy addresses guessability; MFA additionally requires independent factors rather than two knowledge-factor answers. The specified corrective action, “Require an approved complex unique password and a separate supported factor such as an authenticator or hardware security key.”, directly targets that condition. Evidence of resolution: The login rejects weak reused passwords and requires two distinct qualifying factor types for sensitive access.
Incorrect Answers
A:That action addresses a different network issue: A router supports WPA3-Personal but a legacy IoT sensor cannot associate; the installer proposes disabling wireless encryption for everyone. The present fictional Cedar Valley Academy finding instead needs “Require an approved complex unique password and a separate supported factor such as an authenticator or hardware security key.”, verified by “The login rejects weak reused passwords and requires two distinct qualifying factor types for sensitive access.”.
C:That action addresses a different network issue: A team blocks TCP port 80 but claims that every possible web application is unreachable even though HTTPS uses TCP 443. The present fictional Cedar Valley Academy finding instead needs “Require an approved complex unique password and a separate supported factor such as an authenticator or hardware security key.”, verified by “The login rejects weak reused passwords and requires two distinct qualifying factor types for sensitive access.”.
D:That action addresses a different network issue: A firewall policy blocks one UDP service, but the analyst declares a separate TCP service blocked because both use the same numeric port. The present fictional Cedar Valley Academy finding instead needs “Require an approved complex unique password and a separate supported factor such as an authenticator or hardware security key.”, verified by “The login rejects weak reused passwords and requires two distinct qualifying factor types for sensitive access.”.
Question 942
An incident reviewer analyzes this observation: At the fictional Cedar Valley Academy in a technician onboarding review, the team observes: A user authenticates to a critical application with a shared dictionary password and a security question, and the team calls that strong multifactor authentication. What is the MOST specific underlying cause?
- Strong unique password policy addresses guessability; MFA additionally requires independent factors rather than two knowledge-factor answers.
- Firewalls can intentionally block ICMP echo, which affects diagnostic observations without necessarily breaking other services.
- Convenience onboarding features may expose an unnecessary route for unauthorized WLAN enrollment.
- Enterprise WLAN authentication can integrate 802.1X and RADIUS for per-user identity control.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:Correct. This mechanism fits the observed network symptom at the fictional Cedar Valley Academy: Strong unique password policy addresses guessability; MFA additionally requires independent factors rather than two knowledge-factor answers. The corresponding remedy is “Require an approved complex unique password and a separate supported factor such as an authenticator or hardware security key.”. Confirmation: The login rejects weak reused passwords and requires two distinct qualifying factor types for sensitive access.
Incorrect Answers
B:That cause belongs to a different case: A small-business network has a legitimate ICMP troubleshooting requirement but a default deny policy silently drops every echo request and the help desk calls the host dead. The observed fictional Cedar Valley Academy condition is specifically explained by “Strong unique password policy addresses guessability; MFA additionally requires independent factors rather than two knowledge-factor answers.”.
C:That cause belongs to a different case: A user configures a wireless router with a secure password but leaves WPS push-button or PIN onboarding unrestricted despite a policy requiring it off. The observed fictional Cedar Valley Academy condition is specifically explained by “Strong unique password policy addresses guessability; MFA additionally requires independent factors rather than two knowledge-factor answers.”.
D:That cause belongs to a different case: A small company needs individual user credentials and revocation on its secure WLAN but sets only one shared home Wi-Fi password for all employees. The observed fictional Cedar Valley Academy condition is specifically explained by “Strong unique password policy addresses guessability; MFA additionally requires independent factors rather than two knowledge-factor answers.”.
Question 943
After an approved correction, the support team reviews: At the fictional Cedar Valley Academy in a technician onboarding review, the team observes: A user authenticates to a critical application with a shared dictionary password and a security question, and the team calls that strong multifactor authentication. The approved corrective action is: “Require an approved complex unique password and a separate supported factor such as an authenticator or hardware security key.” Which result BEST demonstrates success?
- The WLAN security details show actual authentication and encryption instead of merely a hidden name.
- Client security details show the approved stronger cipher and stable connectivity.
- Authorized clients join using the stronger approved mode and WEP is disabled.
- The login rejects weak reused passwords and requires two distinct qualifying factor types for sensitive access.
Explanation
Correct Answer
D:Correct. This is the required observable acceptance evidence for “Require an approved complex unique password and a separate supported factor such as an authenticator or hardware security key.” at the fictional Cedar Valley Academy. It demonstrates correction of the original cause: Strong unique password policy addresses guessability; MFA additionally requires independent factors rather than two knowledge-factor answers.
Incorrect Answers
A:That result is evidence for a separate corrective action, “Enable a supported WPA-Personal security mode and configure a protected passphrase.”. It does not establish the intended outcome “The login rejects weak reused passwords and requires two distinct qualifying factor types for sensitive access.” for the fictional Cedar Valley Academy case.
B:That result is evidence for a separate corrective action, “Configure WPA2-Personal with AES-CCMP or a suitable WPA3 mode and disable legacy TKIP where supported.”. It does not establish the intended outcome “The login rejects weak reused passwords and requires two distinct qualifying factor types for sensitive access.” for the fictional Cedar Valley Academy case.
C:That result is evidence for a separate corrective action, “Select a supported WPA2-Personal AES or WPA3-Personal mode according to client compatibility.”. It does not establish the intended outcome “The login rejects weak reused passwords and requires two distinct qualifying factor types for sensitive access.” for the fictional Cedar Valley Academy case.
Question 944
Before approving the action, review: At the fictional Cedar Valley Academy in a technician onboarding review, the team observes: A user authenticates to a critical application with a shared dictionary password and a security question, and the team calls that strong multifactor authentication. During “Require an approved complex unique password and a separate supported factor such as an authenticator or hardware security key.”, which precaution MOST specifically prevents a related risk?
- Do not assume changing an SSID label upgrades a client radio to WPA3 support.
- Do not equate an HTTP-only deny rule with a blanket ban on HTTPS services.
- Do not count a password and a security question as two independent MFA factor types.
- Do not equate ICMP filtering with absence of the target host.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:Correct. This precaution prevents a second fault while applying “Require an approved complex unique password and a separate supported factor such as an authenticator or hardware security key.” at the fictional Cedar Valley Academy. The required protection is “Do not count a password and a security question as two independent MFA factor types.”; success still requires “The login rejects weak reused passwords and requires two distinct qualifying factor types for sensitive access.”.
Incorrect Answers
A:This caution is appropriate for a separate failure pattern: A household enables a WPA3-Personal-only SSID and a technician expects old WPA2-only radios to join with no compatibility check. The principal adjacent risk here is controlled by “Do not count a password and a security question as two independent MFA factor types.”.
B:This caution is appropriate for a separate failure pattern: A team blocks TCP port 80 but claims that every possible web application is unreachable even though HTTPS uses TCP 443. The principal adjacent risk here is controlled by “Do not count a password and a security question as two independent MFA factor types.”.
D:This caution is appropriate for a separate failure pattern: A small-business network has a legitimate ICMP troubleshooting requirement but a default deny policy silently drops every echo request and the help desk calls the host dead. The principal adjacent risk here is controlled by “Do not count a password and a security question as two independent MFA factor types.”.
Question 945
A technician reviews the following issue: At the fictional Pinefield Logistics while checking a service ticket, the team observes: A workstation accepts a phishing email asking the user to enter a company password into a lookalike website. Which action MOST directly resolves the reported issue?
- Configure WPA2-Personal with AES-CCMP or a suitable WPA3 mode and disable legacy TKIP where supported.
- Report the message, verify the destination independently and follow the credential-incident response procedure.
- Review and test the actual allowed HTTPS and blocked HTTP traffic separately.
- Review effective IPv6 filtering rules and test the intended deny/allow behavior.
Explanation
Correct Answer
B:Correct. In the fictional Pinefield Logistics case, Phishing uses deceptive messages and impersonation to steal credentials or induce unsafe actions. The specified corrective action, “Report the message, verify the destination independently and follow the credential-incident response procedure.”, directly targets that condition. Evidence of resolution: The malicious link is blocked or reported and affected credentials are handled according to policy.
Incorrect Answers
A:That action addresses a different network issue: A router owner selects WPA2 mode but explicitly forces outdated TKIP ciphers despite current clients supporting AES-CCMP. The present fictional Pinefield Logistics finding instead needs “Report the message, verify the destination independently and follow the credential-incident response procedure.”, verified by “The malicious link is blocked or reported and affected credentials are handled according to policy.”.
C:That action addresses a different network issue: A team blocks TCP port 80 but claims that every possible web application is unreachable even though HTTPS uses TCP 443. The present fictional Pinefield Logistics finding instead needs “Report the message, verify the destination independently and follow the credential-incident response procedure.”, verified by “The malicious link is blocked or reported and affected credentials are handled according to policy.”.
D:That action addresses a different network issue: An office applies IPv4 firewall rules and assumes they automatically protect an enabled IPv6 interface with a separate policy stack. The present fictional Pinefield Logistics finding instead needs “Report the message, verify the destination independently and follow the credential-incident response procedure.”, verified by “The malicious link is blocked or reported and affected credentials are handled according to policy.”.
Question 946
An incident reviewer analyzes this observation: At the fictional Pinefield Logistics while checking a service ticket, the team observes: A workstation accepts a phishing email asking the user to enter a company password into a lookalike website. What is the MOST specific underlying cause?
- Phishing uses deceptive messages and impersonation to steal credentials or induce unsafe actions.
- Convenience onboarding features may expose an unnecessary route for unauthorized WLAN enrollment.
- Effective firewall troubleshooting requires identifying the actual flow and the specific rule or policy decision.
- WPA-Personal security still depends partly on protecting a sufficiently strong shared passphrase.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:Correct. This mechanism fits the observed network symptom at the fictional Pinefield Logistics: Phishing uses deceptive messages and impersonation to steal credentials or induce unsafe actions. The corresponding remedy is “Report the message, verify the destination independently and follow the credential-incident response procedure.”. Confirmation: The malicious link is blocked or reported and affected credentials are handled according to policy.
Incorrect Answers
B:That cause belongs to a different case: A user configures a wireless router with a secure password but leaves WPS push-button or PIN onboarding unrestricted despite a policy requiring it off. The observed fictional Pinefield Logistics condition is specifically explained by “Phishing uses deceptive messages and impersonation to steal credentials or induce unsafe actions.”.
C:That cause belongs to a different case: A help desk hears that a firewall dropped traffic but records no source, destination, direction or rule identifier. The observed fictional Pinefield Logistics condition is specifically explained by “Phishing uses deceptive messages and impersonation to steal credentials or induce unsafe actions.”.
D:That cause belongs to a different case: A home router's guest SSID uses a simple dictionary password printed publicly in a lobby and the owner thinks a strong encryption algorithm makes it safe. The observed fictional Pinefield Logistics condition is specifically explained by “Phishing uses deceptive messages and impersonation to steal credentials or induce unsafe actions.”.
Question 947
After an approved correction, the support team reviews: At the fictional Pinefield Logistics while checking a service ticket, the team observes: A workstation accepts a phishing email asking the user to enter a company password into a lookalike website. The approved corrective action is: “Report the message, verify the destination independently and follow the credential-incident response procedure.” Which result BEST demonstrates success?
- Approved DNS requests receive replies without a broad unsolicited inbound permit.
- The WLAN security details show actual authentication and encryption instead of merely a hidden name.
- Home devices connect using the approved shared secret without an enterprise identity server.
- The malicious link is blocked or reported and affected credentials are handled according to policy.
Explanation
Correct Answer
D:Correct. This is the required observable acceptance evidence for “Report the message, verify the destination independently and follow the credential-incident response procedure.” at the fictional Pinefield Logistics. It demonstrates correction of the original cause: Phishing uses deceptive messages and impersonation to steal credentials or induce unsafe actions.
Incorrect Answers
A:That result is evidence for a separate corrective action, “Check the stateful rule and session table for the authorized DNS exchange.”. It does not establish the intended outcome “The malicious link is blocked or reported and affected credentials are handled according to policy.” for the fictional Pinefield Logistics case.
B:That result is evidence for a separate corrective action, “Enable a supported WPA-Personal security mode and configure a protected passphrase.”. It does not establish the intended outcome “The malicious link is blocked or reported and affected credentials are handled according to policy.” for the fictional Pinefield Logistics case.
C:That result is evidence for a separate corrective action, “Use the appropriate WPA2-Personal passphrase settings for the home SSID.”. It does not establish the intended outcome “The malicious link is blocked or reported and affected credentials are handled according to policy.” for the fictional Pinefield Logistics case.
Question 948
Before approving the action, review: At the fictional Pinefield Logistics while checking a service ticket, the team observes: A workstation accepts a phishing email asking the user to enter a company password into a lookalike website. During “Report the message, verify the destination independently and follow the credential-incident response procedure.”, which precaution MOST specifically prevents a related risk?
- Do not retain WEP on a modern home WLAN as an equivalent alternative to WPA2 or WPA3.
- Do not present NAT as a full substitute for a firewall rule set.
- Do not enter corporate credentials into a link sent by an unverified urgent email.
- Do not reuse easy-to-guess or publicly displayed shared WLAN passwords.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:Correct. This precaution prevents a second fault while applying “Report the message, verify the destination independently and follow the credential-incident response procedure.” at the fictional Pinefield Logistics. The required protection is “Do not enter corporate credentials into a link sent by an unverified urgent email.”; success still requires “The malicious link is blocked or reported and affected credentials are handled according to policy.”.
Incorrect Answers
A:This caution is appropriate for a separate failure pattern: A home router still uses WEP for Wi-Fi security because its owner thinks WEP and WPA3 offer equivalent protection. The principal adjacent risk here is controlled by “Do not enter corporate credentials into a link sent by an unverified urgent email.”.
B:This caution is appropriate for a separate failure pattern: A company configures source NAT at its border and assumes NAT alone blocks every hostile inbound packet as a complete security policy. The principal adjacent risk here is controlled by “Do not enter corporate credentials into a link sent by an unverified urgent email.”.
D:This caution is appropriate for a separate failure pattern: A home router's guest SSID uses a simple dictionary password printed publicly in a lobby and the owner thinks a strong encryption algorithm makes it safe. The principal adjacent risk here is controlled by “Do not enter corporate credentials into a link sent by an unverified urgent email.”.
Question 949
A technician reviews the following issue: At the fictional Orchard Health Clinic after a user reports a recurring problem, the team observes: An unpatched workstation runs an untrusted downloaded attachment that exploits a known vulnerability, encrypts user documents and demands payment. Which action MOST directly resolves the reported issue?
- Review effective IPv6 filtering rules and test the intended deny/allow behavior.
- Isolate the affected endpoint, correct the known exposure and follow the authorized malware incident and recovery playbook.
- Evaluate WPA2-Enterprise or WPA3-Enterprise with an approved authentication service.
- Review and test the actual allowed HTTPS and blocked HTTP traffic separately.
Explanation
Correct Answer
B:Correct. In the fictional Orchard Health Clinic case, A vulnerability is an exploitable weakness; ransomware is a malware threat that abuses weaknesses or user actions to disrupt data availability and integrity. The specified corrective action, “Isolate the affected endpoint, correct the known exposure and follow the authorized malware incident and recovery playbook.”, directly targets that condition. Evidence of resolution: The device is contained and restored from trusted evidence-backed recovery steps without continuing spread.
Incorrect Answers
A:That action addresses a different network issue: An office applies IPv4 firewall rules and assumes they automatically protect an enabled IPv6 interface with a separate policy stack. The present fictional Orchard Health Clinic finding instead needs “Isolate the affected endpoint, correct the known exposure and follow the authorized malware incident and recovery playbook.”, verified by “The device is contained and restored from trusted evidence-backed recovery steps without continuing spread.”.
C:That action addresses a different network issue: A small company needs individual user credentials and revocation on its secure WLAN but sets only one shared home Wi-Fi password for all employees. The present fictional Orchard Health Clinic finding instead needs “Isolate the affected endpoint, correct the known exposure and follow the authorized malware incident and recovery playbook.”, verified by “The device is contained and restored from trusted evidence-backed recovery steps without continuing spread.”.
D:That action addresses a different network issue: A team blocks TCP port 80 but claims that every possible web application is unreachable even though HTTPS uses TCP 443. The present fictional Orchard Health Clinic finding instead needs “Isolate the affected endpoint, correct the known exposure and follow the authorized malware incident and recovery playbook.”, verified by “The device is contained and restored from trusted evidence-backed recovery steps without continuing spread.”.
Question 950
An incident reviewer analyzes this observation: At the fictional Orchard Health Clinic after a user reports a recurring problem, the team observes: An unpatched workstation runs an untrusted downloaded attachment that exploits a known vulnerability, encrypts user documents and demands payment. What is the MOST specific underlying cause?
- A vulnerability is an exploitable weakness; ransomware is a malware threat that abuses weaknesses or user actions to disrupt data availability and integrity.
- Firewalls can intentionally block ICMP echo, which affects diagnostic observations without necessarily breaking other services.
- WPA2-Personal ordinarily authenticates with a shared passphrase, unlike Enterprise 802.1X credentials.
- Firewall decisions depend on protocol and port, and blocking HTTP 80 alone does not block all secure web traffic.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:Correct. This mechanism fits the observed network symptom at the fictional Orchard Health Clinic: A vulnerability is an exploitable weakness; ransomware is a malware threat that abuses weaknesses or user actions to disrupt data availability and integrity. The corresponding remedy is “Isolate the affected endpoint, correct the known exposure and follow the authorized malware incident and recovery playbook.”. Confirmation: The device is contained and restored from trusted evidence-backed recovery steps without continuing spread.
Incorrect Answers
B:That cause belongs to a different case: A small-business network has a legitimate ICMP troubleshooting requirement but a default deny policy silently drops every echo request and the help desk calls the host dead. The observed fictional Orchard Health Clinic condition is specifically explained by “A vulnerability is an exploitable weakness; ransomware is a malware threat that abuses weaknesses or user actions to disrupt data availability and integrity.”.
C:That cause belongs to a different case: A family router is configured to WPA2-Personal but a technician asks every user to enter a corporate RADIUS username to connect. The observed fictional Orchard Health Clinic condition is specifically explained by “A vulnerability is an exploitable weakness; ransomware is a malware threat that abuses weaknesses or user actions to disrupt data availability and integrity.”.
D:That cause belongs to a different case: A team blocks TCP port 80 but claims that every possible web application is unreachable even though HTTPS uses TCP 443. The observed fictional Orchard Health Clinic condition is specifically explained by “A vulnerability is an exploitable weakness; ransomware is a malware threat that abuses weaknesses or user actions to disrupt data availability and integrity.”.