Cisco Certified Support Technician (CCST) Networking 100-150 Practice Test 94
Question 930
An incident reviewer analyzes this observation: At the fictional Silverleaf Clinic after a site connectivity report, the team observes: A vital help-desk application is inaccessible after a power failure but its data is secret and unaltered; an analyst says the CIA triad shows no issue. What is the MOST specific underlying cause?
- Availability is compromised when authorized users cannot access a required service.
- Firewall decisions depend on protocol and port, and blocking HTTP 80 alone does not block all secure web traffic.
- Stateful firewalls can track permitted sessions and allow legitimate return traffic according to policy.
- WEP is obsolete and insecure compared with modern WPA2 or WPA3 options.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:Correct. This mechanism fits the observed network symptom at the fictional Silverleaf Clinic: Availability is compromised when authorized users cannot access a required service. The corresponding remedy is “Restore and test the application's approved availability or resilience controls.”. Confirmation: Authorized users can reach the service again after recovery.
Incorrect Answers
B:That cause belongs to a different case: A team blocks TCP port 80 but claims that every possible web application is unreachable even though HTTPS uses TCP 443. The observed fictional Silverleaf Clinic condition is specifically explained by “Availability is compromised when authorized users cannot access a required service.”.
C:That cause belongs to a different case: A branch firewall permits DNS queries to a resolver but blocks corresponding response packets because the team treats every return packet as a new unrelated inbound flow. The observed fictional Silverleaf Clinic condition is specifically explained by “Availability is compromised when authorized users cannot access a required service.”.
D:That cause belongs to a different case: A home router still uses WEP for Wi-Fi security because its owner thinks WEP and WPA3 offer equivalent protection. The observed fictional Silverleaf Clinic condition is specifically explained by “Availability is compromised when authorized users cannot access a required service.”.
Question 931
After an approved correction, the support team reviews: At the fictional Silverleaf Clinic after a site connectivity report, the team observes: A vital help-desk application is inaccessible after a power failure but its data is secret and unaltered; an analyst says the CIA triad shows no issue. The approved corrective action is: “Restore and test the application's approved availability or resilience controls.” Which result BEST demonstrates success?
- The authorized support host connects while unrelated inbound attempts remain denied.
- Client security details show the approved stronger cipher and stable connectivity.
- Routine WPA2 or WPA3 connections still work and WPS enrollment is unavailable.
- Authorized users can reach the service again after recovery.
Explanation
Correct Answer
D:Correct. This is the required observable acceptance evidence for “Restore and test the application's approved availability or resilience controls.” at the fictional Silverleaf Clinic. It demonstrates correction of the original cause: Availability is compromised when authorized users cannot access a required service.
Incorrect Answers
A:That result is evidence for a separate corrective action, “Add or correct the approved rule for the specific managed endpoint and RDP service as policy allows.”. It does not establish the intended outcome “Authorized users can reach the service again after recovery.” for the fictional Silverleaf Clinic case.
B:That result is evidence for a separate corrective action, “Configure WPA2-Personal with AES-CCMP or a suitable WPA3 mode and disable legacy TKIP where supported.”. It does not establish the intended outcome “Authorized users can reach the service again after recovery.” for the fictional Silverleaf Clinic case.
C:That result is evidence for a separate corrective action, “Disable WPS in the home router's supported security settings where policy requires it.”. It does not establish the intended outcome “Authorized users can reach the service again after recovery.” for the fictional Silverleaf Clinic case.
Question 932
Before approving the action, review: At the fictional Silverleaf Clinic after a site connectivity report, the team observes: A vital help-desk application is inaccessible after a power failure but its data is secret and unaltered; an analyst says the CIA triad shows no issue. During “Restore and test the application's approved availability or resilience controls.”, which precaution MOST specifically prevents a related risk?
- Do not present NAT as a full substitute for a firewall rule set.
- Do not leave an unrestricted inbound any-to-any permit when only one service is required.
- Do not ignore loss of availability simply because confidentiality and integrity appear intact.
- Do not equate an HTTP-only deny rule with a blanket ban on HTTPS services.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:Correct. This precaution prevents a second fault while applying “Restore and test the application's approved availability or resilience controls.” at the fictional Silverleaf Clinic. The required protection is “Do not ignore loss of availability simply because confidentiality and integrity appear intact.”; success still requires “Authorized users can reach the service again after recovery.”.
Incorrect Answers
A:This caution is appropriate for a separate failure pattern: A company configures source NAT at its border and assumes NAT alone blocks every hostile inbound packet as a complete security policy. The principal adjacent risk here is controlled by “Do not ignore loss of availability simply because confidentiality and integrity appear intact.”.
B:This caution is appropriate for a separate failure pattern: A home router permits unsolicited inbound traffic to an internal web server after an unreviewed any-to-any firewall rule is installed. The principal adjacent risk here is controlled by “Do not ignore loss of availability simply because confidentiality and integrity appear intact.”.
D:This caution is appropriate for a separate failure pattern: A team blocks TCP port 80 but claims that every possible web application is unreachable even though HTTPS uses TCP 443. The principal adjacent risk here is controlled by “Do not ignore loss of availability simply because confidentiality and integrity appear intact.”.
Question 933
A technician reviews the following issue: At the fictional Rivergate Branch during its network support shift, the team observes: A corporate Wi-Fi admin verifies a user's password against Active Directory but the authorization policy still denies a restricted VLAN; the team calls the two steps identical. Which action MOST directly resolves the reported issue?
- Use the appropriate WPA2-Personal passphrase settings for the home SSID.
- Distinguish the successful directory authentication from the later VLAN access-control decision in the logs.
- Restrict inbound access to the approved destination service, protocol, source scope and port.
- Enable a supported WPA-Personal security mode and configure a protected passphrase.
Explanation
Correct Answer
B:Correct. In the fictional Rivergate Branch case, Authentication can verify an identity in a directory such as Active Directory, while authorization separately decides the user's permitted resources. The specified corrective action, “Distinguish the successful directory authentication from the later VLAN access-control decision in the logs.”, directly targets that condition. Evidence of resolution: The report shows successful identity verification followed by a separately explained authorization denial.
Incorrect Answers
A:That action addresses a different network issue: A family router is configured to WPA2-Personal but a technician asks every user to enter a corporate RADIUS username to connect. The present fictional Rivergate Branch finding instead needs “Distinguish the successful directory authentication from the later VLAN access-control decision in the logs.”, verified by “The report shows successful identity verification followed by a separately explained authorization denial.”.
C:That action addresses a different network issue: A home router permits unsolicited inbound traffic to an internal web server after an unreviewed any-to-any firewall rule is installed. The present fictional Rivergate Branch finding instead needs “Distinguish the successful directory authentication from the later VLAN access-control decision in the logs.”, verified by “The report shows successful identity verification followed by a separately explained authorization denial.”.
D:That action addresses a different network issue: A parent turns off SSID broadcast and calls the Wi-Fi network fully encrypted even though the router security mode is open. The present fictional Rivergate Branch finding instead needs “Distinguish the successful directory authentication from the later VLAN access-control decision in the logs.”, verified by “The report shows successful identity verification followed by a separately explained authorization denial.”.
Question 934
An incident reviewer analyzes this observation: At the fictional Rivergate Branch during its network support shift, the team observes: A corporate Wi-Fi admin verifies a user's password against Active Directory but the authorization policy still denies a restricted VLAN; the team calls the two steps identical. What is the MOST specific underlying cause?
- Authentication can verify an identity in a directory such as Active Directory, while authorization separately decides the user's permitted resources.
- WPA2 with AES-CCMP is preferable to legacy TKIP for modern secure WLAN operation.
- WLAN security mode must balance supported client capabilities without abandoning protection.
- Firewall decisions depend on protocol and port, and blocking HTTP 80 alone does not block all secure web traffic.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:Correct. This mechanism fits the observed network symptom at the fictional Rivergate Branch: Authentication can verify an identity in a directory such as Active Directory, while authorization separately decides the user's permitted resources. The corresponding remedy is “Distinguish the successful directory authentication from the later VLAN access-control decision in the logs.”. Confirmation: The report shows successful identity verification followed by a separately explained authorization denial.
Incorrect Answers
B:That cause belongs to a different case: A router owner selects WPA2 mode but explicitly forces outdated TKIP ciphers despite current clients supporting AES-CCMP. The observed fictional Rivergate Branch condition is specifically explained by “Authentication can verify an identity in a directory such as Active Directory, while authorization separately decides the user's permitted resources.”.
C:That cause belongs to a different case: A router supports WPA3-Personal but a legacy IoT sensor cannot associate; the installer proposes disabling wireless encryption for everyone. The observed fictional Rivergate Branch condition is specifically explained by “Authentication can verify an identity in a directory such as Active Directory, while authorization separately decides the user's permitted resources.”.
D:That cause belongs to a different case: A team blocks TCP port 80 but claims that every possible web application is unreachable even though HTTPS uses TCP 443. The observed fictional Rivergate Branch condition is specifically explained by “Authentication can verify an identity in a directory such as Active Directory, while authorization separately decides the user's permitted resources.”.
Question 935
After an approved correction, the support team reviews: At the fictional Rivergate Branch during its network support shift, the team observes: A corporate Wi-Fi admin verifies a user's password against Active Directory but the authorization policy still denies a restricted VLAN; the team calls the two steps identical. The approved corrective action is: “Distinguish the successful directory authentication from the later VLAN access-control decision in the logs.” Which result BEST demonstrates success?
- TCP 80 attempts are blocked while policy-approved TCP 443 sessions still succeed.
- A revoked user account loses network access without changing every other user's credential.
- A test reaches the authorized service while unrelated inbound ports remain blocked.
- The report shows successful identity verification followed by a separately explained authorization denial.
Explanation
Correct Answer
D:Correct. This is the required observable acceptance evidence for “Distinguish the successful directory authentication from the later VLAN access-control decision in the logs.” at the fictional Rivergate Branch. It demonstrates correction of the original cause: Authentication can verify an identity in a directory such as Active Directory, while authorization separately decides the user's permitted resources.
Incorrect Answers
A:That result is evidence for a separate corrective action, “Review and test the actual allowed HTTPS and blocked HTTP traffic separately.”. It does not establish the intended outcome “The report shows successful identity verification followed by a separately explained authorization denial.” for the fictional Rivergate Branch case.
B:That result is evidence for a separate corrective action, “Evaluate WPA2-Enterprise or WPA3-Enterprise with an approved authentication service.”. It does not establish the intended outcome “The report shows successful identity verification followed by a separately explained authorization denial.” for the fictional Rivergate Branch case.
C:That result is evidence for a separate corrective action, “Restrict inbound access to the approved destination service, protocol, source scope and port.”. It does not establish the intended outcome “The report shows successful identity verification followed by a separately explained authorization denial.” for the fictional Rivergate Branch case.
Question 936
Before approving the action, review: At the fictional Rivergate Branch during its network support shift, the team observes: A corporate Wi-Fi admin verifies a user's password against Active Directory but the authorization policy still denies a restricted VLAN; the team calls the two steps identical. During “Distinguish the successful directory authentication from the later VLAN access-control decision in the logs.”, which precaution MOST specifically prevents a related risk?
- Do not disable the whole firewall to fix one RDP access requirement.
- Do not rely on a rule that is shadowed by an earlier broader permit.
- Do not grant administrative rights merely because a user authenticated successfully.
- Do not leave an unrestricted inbound any-to-any permit when only one service is required.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:Correct. This precaution prevents a second fault while applying “Distinguish the successful directory authentication from the later VLAN access-control decision in the logs.” at the fictional Rivergate Branch. The required protection is “Do not grant administrative rights merely because a user authenticated successfully.”; success still requires “The report shows successful identity verification followed by a separately explained authorization denial.”.
Incorrect Answers
A:This caution is appropriate for a separate failure pattern: A firewall denies a needed remote desktop session and a technician disables the firewall entirely to make one connection work. The principal adjacent risk here is controlled by “Do not grant administrative rights merely because a user authenticated successfully.”.
B:This caution is appropriate for a separate failure pattern: A guest Wi-Fi network must be blocked from the accounting subnet but a technician places an allow-all rule before a later deny and assumes the deny overrides it. The principal adjacent risk here is controlled by “Do not grant administrative rights merely because a user authenticated successfully.”.
D:This caution is appropriate for a separate failure pattern: A home router permits unsolicited inbound traffic to an internal web server after an unreviewed any-to-any firewall rule is installed. The principal adjacent risk here is controlled by “Do not grant administrative rights merely because a user authenticated successfully.”.
Question 937
A technician reviews the following issue: At the fictional Lakebridge Travel Office before a planned system change, the team observes: A support engineer investigates an unauthorized router change but the system logs no record of which administrator made it. Which action MOST directly resolves the reported issue?
- Disable WPS in the home router's supported security settings where policy requires it.
- Enable authorized management activity logging and retain the appropriate audit records.
- Place and validate the guest-to-accounting deny in the effective evaluated policy order.
- Check the ICMP policy and use appropriately authorized probes or application tests.
Explanation
Correct Answer
B:Correct. In the fictional Lakebridge Travel Office case, Accounting or auditing in AAA records actions and ties them to authenticated identities and times. The specified corrective action, “Enable authorized management activity logging and retain the appropriate audit records.”, directly targets that condition. Evidence of resolution: A test configuration change is attributed to the correct user and time.
Incorrect Answers
A:That action addresses a different network issue: A user configures a wireless router with a secure password but leaves WPS push-button or PIN onboarding unrestricted despite a policy requiring it off. The present fictional Lakebridge Travel Office finding instead needs “Enable authorized management activity logging and retain the appropriate audit records.”, verified by “A test configuration change is attributed to the correct user and time.”.
C:That action addresses a different network issue: A guest Wi-Fi network must be blocked from the accounting subnet but a technician places an allow-all rule before a later deny and assumes the deny overrides it. The present fictional Lakebridge Travel Office finding instead needs “Enable authorized management activity logging and retain the appropriate audit records.”, verified by “A test configuration change is attributed to the correct user and time.”.
D:That action addresses a different network issue: A small-business network has a legitimate ICMP troubleshooting requirement but a default deny policy silently drops every echo request and the help desk calls the host dead. The present fictional Lakebridge Travel Office finding instead needs “Enable authorized management activity logging and retain the appropriate audit records.”, verified by “A test configuration change is attributed to the correct user and time.”.
Question 938
An incident reviewer analyzes this observation: At the fictional Lakebridge Travel Office before a planned system change, the team observes: A support engineer investigates an unauthorized router change but the system logs no record of which administrator made it. What is the MOST specific underlying cause?
- Accounting or auditing in AAA records actions and ties them to authenticated identities and times.
- Protocol and port must both be considered when matching a transport-level firewall rule.
- Hiding the SSID does not replace WPA2 or WPA3 encryption and authentication.
- Firewall policies are evaluated according to platform-specific rule ordering and an earlier broad permit may prevent the later deny from matching.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:Correct. This mechanism fits the observed network symptom at the fictional Lakebridge Travel Office: Accounting or auditing in AAA records actions and ties them to authenticated identities and times. The corresponding remedy is “Enable authorized management activity logging and retain the appropriate audit records.”. Confirmation: A test configuration change is attributed to the correct user and time.
Incorrect Answers
B:That cause belongs to a different case: A firewall policy blocks one UDP service, but the analyst declares a separate TCP service blocked because both use the same numeric port. The observed fictional Lakebridge Travel Office condition is specifically explained by “Accounting or auditing in AAA records actions and ties them to authenticated identities and times.”.
C:That cause belongs to a different case: A parent turns off SSID broadcast and calls the Wi-Fi network fully encrypted even though the router security mode is open. The observed fictional Lakebridge Travel Office condition is specifically explained by “Accounting or auditing in AAA records actions and ties them to authenticated identities and times.”.
D:That cause belongs to a different case: A guest Wi-Fi network must be blocked from the accounting subnet but a technician places an allow-all rule before a later deny and assumes the deny overrides it. The observed fictional Lakebridge Travel Office condition is specifically explained by “Accounting or auditing in AAA records actions and ties them to authenticated identities and times.”.
Question 939
After an approved correction, the support team reviews: At the fictional Lakebridge Travel Office before a planned system change, the team observes: A support engineer investigates an unauthorized router change but the system logs no record of which administrator made it. The approved corrective action is: “Enable authorized management activity logging and retain the appropriate audit records.” Which result BEST demonstrates success?
- Unapproved users can no longer connect using the old lobby credential.
- TCP 80 attempts are blocked while policy-approved TCP 443 sessions still succeed.
- WPA3-capable devices join the protected network and unsupported clients receive documented alternatives.
- A test configuration change is attributed to the correct user and time.
Explanation
Correct Answer
D:Correct. This is the required observable acceptance evidence for “Enable authorized management activity logging and retain the appropriate audit records.” at the fictional Lakebridge Travel Office. It demonstrates correction of the original cause: Accounting or auditing in AAA records actions and ties them to authenticated identities and times.
Incorrect Answers
A:That result is evidence for a separate corrective action, “Replace the exposed weak passphrase with a high-entropy unique Wi-Fi secret and update authorized clients.”. It does not establish the intended outcome “A test configuration change is attributed to the correct user and time.” for the fictional Lakebridge Travel Office case.
B:That result is evidence for a separate corrective action, “Review and test the actual allowed HTTPS and blocked HTTP traffic separately.”. It does not establish the intended outcome “A test configuration change is attributed to the correct user and time.” for the fictional Lakebridge Travel Office case.
C:That result is evidence for a separate corrective action, “Check client WPA3 capabilities or create a separately protected compatible SSID under policy.”. It does not establish the intended outcome “A test configuration change is attributed to the correct user and time.” for the fictional Lakebridge Travel Office case.
Question 940
Before approving the action, review: At the fictional Lakebridge Travel Office before a planned system change, the team observes: A support engineer investigates an unauthorized router change but the system logs no record of which administrator made it. During “Enable authorized management activity logging and retain the appropriate audit records.”, which precaution MOST specifically prevents a related risk?
- Do not equate an HTTP-only deny rule with a blanket ban on HTTPS services.
- Do not open all inbound ports merely to allow responses to established requests.
- Do not use shared unlogged administrator accounts when action accountability is required.
- Do not assume a strong WPA passphrase means all alternative onboarding paths are automatically disabled.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:Correct. This precaution prevents a second fault while applying “Enable authorized management activity logging and retain the appropriate audit records.” at the fictional Lakebridge Travel Office. The required protection is “Do not use shared unlogged administrator accounts when action accountability is required.”; success still requires “A test configuration change is attributed to the correct user and time.”.
Incorrect Answers
A:This caution is appropriate for a separate failure pattern: A team blocks TCP port 80 but claims that every possible web application is unreachable even though HTTPS uses TCP 443. The principal adjacent risk here is controlled by “Do not use shared unlogged administrator accounts when action accountability is required.”.
B:This caution is appropriate for a separate failure pattern: A branch firewall permits DNS queries to a resolver but blocks corresponding response packets because the team treats every return packet as a new unrelated inbound flow. The principal adjacent risk here is controlled by “Do not use shared unlogged administrator accounts when action accountability is required.”.
D:This caution is appropriate for a separate failure pattern: A user configures a wireless router with a secure password but leaves WPS push-button or PIN onboarding unrestricted despite a policy requiring it off. The principal adjacent risk here is controlled by “Do not use shared unlogged administrator accounts when action accountability is required.”.