Cisco Certified Support Technician (CCST) Networking 100-150 Practice Test 93
Question 920
Before approving the action, review: At the fictional Oakside Warehouse while checking a service ticket, the team observes: A help desk hears that a firewall dropped traffic but records no source, destination, direction or rule identifier. During “Inspect permitted firewall logs for source/destination IP, ports, protocol, direction and matched rule.”, which precaution MOST specifically prevents a related risk?
- Do not install firmware solely because it downloaded successfully.
- Do not grant administrative rights merely because a user authenticated successfully.
- Do not add an any-to-any allow rule without first identifying the actual denied flow.
- Do not count a password and a security question as two independent MFA factor types.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:Correct. This precaution prevents a second fault while applying “Inspect permitted firewall logs for source/destination IP, ports, protocol, direction and matched rule.” at the fictional Oakside Warehouse. The required protection is “Do not add an any-to-any allow rule without first identifying the actual denied flow.”; success still requires “The documented decision maps the denied flow to a policy rule that can be reviewed.”.
Incorrect Answers
A:This caution is appropriate for a separate failure pattern: A firmware download is modified in transit but remains readable and available to technicians, who claim security is fully preserved. The principal adjacent risk here is controlled by “Do not add an any-to-any allow rule without first identifying the actual denied flow.”.
B:This caution is appropriate for a separate failure pattern: A corporate Wi-Fi admin verifies a user's password against Active Directory but the authorization policy still denies a restricted VLAN; the team calls the two steps identical. The principal adjacent risk here is controlled by “Do not add an any-to-any allow rule without first identifying the actual denied flow.”.
D:This caution is appropriate for a separate failure pattern: A user authenticates to a critical application with a shared dictionary password and a security question, and the team calls that strong multifactor authentication. The principal adjacent risk here is controlled by “Do not add an any-to-any allow rule without first identifying the actual denied flow.”.
Question 921
A technician reviews the following issue: At the fictional Redwood Repair Shop during basic configuration verification, the team observes: A confidential payroll file is posted on a public share and the team celebrates because nobody has changed its contents. Which action MOST directly resolves the reported issue?
- Check the ICMP policy and use appropriately authorized probes or application tests.
- Restrict access to approved identities and remove unintended public sharing.
- Select a supported WPA2-Personal AES or WPA3-Personal mode according to client compatibility.
- Restrict inbound access to the approved destination service, protocol, source scope and port.
Explanation
Correct Answer
B:Correct. In the fictional Redwood Repair Shop case, Confidentiality concerns authorized disclosure and can be violated even if integrity remains intact. The specified corrective action, “Restrict access to approved identities and remove unintended public sharing.”, directly targets that condition. Evidence of resolution: Unauthorized accounts can no longer read the file while authorized staff retain access.
Incorrect Answers
A:That action addresses a different network issue: A small-business network has a legitimate ICMP troubleshooting requirement but a default deny policy silently drops every echo request and the help desk calls the host dead. The present fictional Redwood Repair Shop finding instead needs “Restrict access to approved identities and remove unintended public sharing.”, verified by “Unauthorized accounts can no longer read the file while authorized staff retain access.”.
C:That action addresses a different network issue: A home router still uses WEP for Wi-Fi security because its owner thinks WEP and WPA3 offer equivalent protection. The present fictional Redwood Repair Shop finding instead needs “Restrict access to approved identities and remove unintended public sharing.”, verified by “Unauthorized accounts can no longer read the file while authorized staff retain access.”.
D:That action addresses a different network issue: A home router permits unsolicited inbound traffic to an internal web server after an unreviewed any-to-any firewall rule is installed. The present fictional Redwood Repair Shop finding instead needs “Restrict access to approved identities and remove unintended public sharing.”, verified by “Unauthorized accounts can no longer read the file while authorized staff retain access.”.
Question 922
An incident reviewer analyzes this observation: At the fictional Redwood Repair Shop during basic configuration verification, the team observes: A confidential payroll file is posted on a public share and the team celebrates because nobody has changed its contents. What is the MOST specific underlying cause?
- Confidentiality concerns authorized disclosure and can be violated even if integrity remains intact.
- Effective firewall troubleshooting requires identifying the actual flow and the specific rule or policy decision.
- Network address translation changes addressing and does not replace explicit traffic-filtering controls.
- Protocol and port must both be considered when matching a transport-level firewall rule.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:Correct. This mechanism fits the observed network symptom at the fictional Redwood Repair Shop: Confidentiality concerns authorized disclosure and can be violated even if integrity remains intact. The corresponding remedy is “Restrict access to approved identities and remove unintended public sharing.”. Confirmation: Unauthorized accounts can no longer read the file while authorized staff retain access.
Incorrect Answers
B:That cause belongs to a different case: A help desk hears that a firewall dropped traffic but records no source, destination, direction or rule identifier. The observed fictional Redwood Repair Shop condition is specifically explained by “Confidentiality concerns authorized disclosure and can be violated even if integrity remains intact.”.
C:That cause belongs to a different case: A company configures source NAT at its border and assumes NAT alone blocks every hostile inbound packet as a complete security policy. The observed fictional Redwood Repair Shop condition is specifically explained by “Confidentiality concerns authorized disclosure and can be violated even if integrity remains intact.”.
D:That cause belongs to a different case: A firewall policy blocks one UDP service, but the analyst declares a separate TCP service blocked because both use the same numeric port. The observed fictional Redwood Repair Shop condition is specifically explained by “Confidentiality concerns authorized disclosure and can be violated even if integrity remains intact.”.
Question 923
After an approved correction, the support team reviews: At the fictional Redwood Repair Shop during basic configuration verification, the team observes: A confidential payroll file is posted on a public share and the team celebrates because nobody has changed its contents. The approved corrective action is: “Restrict access to approved identities and remove unintended public sharing.” Which result BEST demonstrates success?
- A revoked user account loses network access without changing every other user's credential.
- The WLAN security details show actual authentication and encryption instead of merely a hidden name.
- Authorized clients join using the stronger approved mode and WEP is disabled.
- Unauthorized accounts can no longer read the file while authorized staff retain access.
Explanation
Correct Answer
D:Correct. This is the required observable acceptance evidence for “Restrict access to approved identities and remove unintended public sharing.” at the fictional Redwood Repair Shop. It demonstrates correction of the original cause: Confidentiality concerns authorized disclosure and can be violated even if integrity remains intact.
Incorrect Answers
A:That result is evidence for a separate corrective action, “Evaluate WPA2-Enterprise or WPA3-Enterprise with an approved authentication service.”. It does not establish the intended outcome “Unauthorized accounts can no longer read the file while authorized staff retain access.” for the fictional Redwood Repair Shop case.
B:That result is evidence for a separate corrective action, “Enable a supported WPA-Personal security mode and configure a protected passphrase.”. It does not establish the intended outcome “Unauthorized accounts can no longer read the file while authorized staff retain access.” for the fictional Redwood Repair Shop case.
C:That result is evidence for a separate corrective action, “Select a supported WPA2-Personal AES or WPA3-Personal mode according to client compatibility.”. It does not establish the intended outcome “Unauthorized accounts can no longer read the file while authorized staff retain access.” for the fictional Redwood Repair Shop case.
Question 924
Before approving the action, review: At the fictional Redwood Repair Shop during basic configuration verification, the team observes: A confidential payroll file is posted on a public share and the team celebrates because nobody has changed its contents. During “Restrict access to approved identities and remove unintended public sharing.”, which precaution MOST specifically prevents a related risk?
- Do not assume a UDP-port deny automatically covers TCP with the same number.
- Do not treat TKIP as the preferred modern cipher when AES-CCMP is supported.
- Do not treat unchanged file content as evidence that confidentiality is protected.
- Do not claim a shared WPA-Personal passphrase supports individual account revocation.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:Correct. This precaution prevents a second fault while applying “Restrict access to approved identities and remove unintended public sharing.” at the fictional Redwood Repair Shop. The required protection is “Do not treat unchanged file content as evidence that confidentiality is protected.”; success still requires “Unauthorized accounts can no longer read the file while authorized staff retain access.”.
Incorrect Answers
A:This caution is appropriate for a separate failure pattern: A firewall policy blocks one UDP service, but the analyst declares a separate TCP service blocked because both use the same numeric port. The principal adjacent risk here is controlled by “Do not treat unchanged file content as evidence that confidentiality is protected.”.
B:This caution is appropriate for a separate failure pattern: A router owner selects WPA2 mode but explicitly forces outdated TKIP ciphers despite current clients supporting AES-CCMP. The principal adjacent risk here is controlled by “Do not treat unchanged file content as evidence that confidentiality is protected.”.
D:This caution is appropriate for a separate failure pattern: A small company needs individual user credentials and revocation on its secure WLAN but sets only one shared home Wi-Fi password for all employees. The principal adjacent risk here is controlled by “Do not treat unchanged file content as evidence that confidentiality is protected.”.
Question 925
A technician reviews the following issue: At the fictional Millview Retail while assessing a controlled network fault, the team observes: A firmware download is modified in transit but remains readable and available to technicians, who claim security is fully preserved. Which action MOST directly resolves the reported issue?
- Place and validate the guest-to-accounting deny in the effective evaluated policy order.
- Verify the firmware's trusted signature or approved checksum before installation.
- Add or correct the approved rule for the specific managed endpoint and RDP service as policy allows.
- Replace the exposed weak passphrase with a high-entropy unique Wi-Fi secret and update authorized clients.
Explanation
Correct Answer
B:Correct. In the fictional Millview Retail case, Integrity requires detecting unauthorized content changes, independent of availability and readability. The specified corrective action, “Verify the firmware's trusted signature or approved checksum before installation.”, directly targets that condition. Evidence of resolution: The tampered file fails integrity validation and the authentic signed package passes.
Incorrect Answers
A:That action addresses a different network issue: A guest Wi-Fi network must be blocked from the accounting subnet but a technician places an allow-all rule before a later deny and assumes the deny overrides it. The present fictional Millview Retail finding instead needs “Verify the firmware's trusted signature or approved checksum before installation.”, verified by “The tampered file fails integrity validation and the authentic signed package passes.”.
C:That action addresses a different network issue: A firewall denies a needed remote desktop session and a technician disables the firewall entirely to make one connection work. The present fictional Millview Retail finding instead needs “Verify the firmware's trusted signature or approved checksum before installation.”, verified by “The tampered file fails integrity validation and the authentic signed package passes.”.
D:That action addresses a different network issue: A home router's guest SSID uses a simple dictionary password printed publicly in a lobby and the owner thinks a strong encryption algorithm makes it safe. The present fictional Millview Retail finding instead needs “Verify the firmware's trusted signature or approved checksum before installation.”, verified by “The tampered file fails integrity validation and the authentic signed package passes.”.
Question 926
An incident reviewer analyzes this observation: At the fictional Millview Retail while assessing a controlled network fault, the team observes: A firmware download is modified in transit but remains readable and available to technicians, who claim security is fully preserved. What is the MOST specific underlying cause?
- Integrity requires detecting unauthorized content changes, independent of availability and readability.
- Convenience onboarding features may expose an unnecessary route for unauthorized WLAN enrollment.
- WEP is obsolete and insecure compared with modern WPA2 or WPA3 options.
- Network address translation changes addressing and does not replace explicit traffic-filtering controls.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:Correct. This mechanism fits the observed network symptom at the fictional Millview Retail: Integrity requires detecting unauthorized content changes, independent of availability and readability. The corresponding remedy is “Verify the firmware's trusted signature or approved checksum before installation.”. Confirmation: The tampered file fails integrity validation and the authentic signed package passes.
Incorrect Answers
B:That cause belongs to a different case: A user configures a wireless router with a secure password but leaves WPS push-button or PIN onboarding unrestricted despite a policy requiring it off. The observed fictional Millview Retail condition is specifically explained by “Integrity requires detecting unauthorized content changes, independent of availability and readability.”.
C:That cause belongs to a different case: A home router still uses WEP for Wi-Fi security because its owner thinks WEP and WPA3 offer equivalent protection. The observed fictional Millview Retail condition is specifically explained by “Integrity requires detecting unauthorized content changes, independent of availability and readability.”.
D:That cause belongs to a different case: A company configures source NAT at its border and assumes NAT alone blocks every hostile inbound packet as a complete security policy. The observed fictional Millview Retail condition is specifically explained by “Integrity requires detecting unauthorized content changes, independent of availability and readability.”.
Question 927
After an approved correction, the support team reviews: At the fictional Millview Retail while assessing a controlled network fault, the team observes: A firmware download is modified in transit but remains readable and available to technicians, who claim security is fully preserved. The approved corrective action is: “Verify the firmware's trusted signature or approved checksum before installation.” Which result BEST demonstrates success?
- The old client connects only to its constrained approved network and modern clients retain secure associations.
- The same approved security intent is enforced for both active address families.
- Guest traffic is denied while separately approved internet access still works.
- The tampered file fails integrity validation and the authentic signed package passes.
Explanation
Correct Answer
D:Correct. This is the required observable acceptance evidence for “Verify the firmware's trusted signature or approved checksum before installation.” at the fictional Millview Retail. It demonstrates correction of the original cause: Integrity requires detecting unauthorized content changes, independent of availability and readability.
Incorrect Answers
A:That result is evidence for a separate corrective action, “Test a documented WPA2-AES compatibility SSID or isolate the legacy device while keeping strong security on other WLANs.”. It does not establish the intended outcome “The tampered file fails integrity validation and the authentic signed package passes.” for the fictional Millview Retail case.
B:That result is evidence for a separate corrective action, “Review effective IPv6 filtering rules and test the intended deny/allow behavior.”. It does not establish the intended outcome “The tampered file fails integrity validation and the authentic signed package passes.” for the fictional Millview Retail case.
C:That result is evidence for a separate corrective action, “Place and validate the guest-to-accounting deny in the effective evaluated policy order.”. It does not establish the intended outcome “The tampered file fails integrity validation and the authentic signed package passes.” for the fictional Millview Retail case.
Question 928
Before approving the action, review: At the fictional Millview Retail while assessing a controlled network fault, the team observes: A firmware download is modified in transit but remains readable and available to technicians, who claim security is fully preserved. During “Verify the firmware's trusted signature or approved checksum before installation.”, which precaution MOST specifically prevents a related risk?
- Do not turn the entire main WLAN into an open network for one incompatible device.
- Do not leave IPv6 access unrestricted solely because IPv4 rules exist.
- Do not install firmware solely because it downloaded successfully.
- Do not equate an HTTP-only deny rule with a blanket ban on HTTPS services.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:Correct. This precaution prevents a second fault while applying “Verify the firmware's trusted signature or approved checksum before installation.” at the fictional Millview Retail. The required protection is “Do not install firmware solely because it downloaded successfully.”; success still requires “The tampered file fails integrity validation and the authentic signed package passes.”.
Incorrect Answers
A:This caution is appropriate for a separate failure pattern: A router supports WPA3-Personal but a legacy IoT sensor cannot associate; the installer proposes disabling wireless encryption for everyone. The principal adjacent risk here is controlled by “Do not install firmware solely because it downloaded successfully.”.
B:This caution is appropriate for a separate failure pattern: An office applies IPv4 firewall rules and assumes they automatically protect an enabled IPv6 interface with a separate policy stack. The principal adjacent risk here is controlled by “Do not install firmware solely because it downloaded successfully.”.
D:This caution is appropriate for a separate failure pattern: A team blocks TCP port 80 but claims that every possible web application is unreachable even though HTTPS uses TCP 443. The principal adjacent risk here is controlled by “Do not install firmware solely because it downloaded successfully.”.
Question 929
A technician reviews the following issue: At the fictional Silverleaf Clinic after a site connectivity report, the team observes: A vital help-desk application is inaccessible after a power failure but its data is secret and unaltered; an analyst says the CIA triad shows no issue. Which action MOST directly resolves the reported issue?
- Check the stateful rule and session table for the authorized DNS exchange.
- Restore and test the application's approved availability or resilience controls.
- Configure WPA2-Personal with AES-CCMP or a suitable WPA3 mode and disable legacy TKIP where supported.
- Replace the exposed weak passphrase with a high-entropy unique Wi-Fi secret and update authorized clients.
Explanation
Correct Answer
B:Correct. In the fictional Silverleaf Clinic case, Availability is compromised when authorized users cannot access a required service. The specified corrective action, “Restore and test the application's approved availability or resilience controls.”, directly targets that condition. Evidence of resolution: Authorized users can reach the service again after recovery.
Incorrect Answers
A:That action addresses a different network issue: A branch firewall permits DNS queries to a resolver but blocks corresponding response packets because the team treats every return packet as a new unrelated inbound flow. The present fictional Silverleaf Clinic finding instead needs “Restore and test the application's approved availability or resilience controls.”, verified by “Authorized users can reach the service again after recovery.”.
C:That action addresses a different network issue: A router owner selects WPA2 mode but explicitly forces outdated TKIP ciphers despite current clients supporting AES-CCMP. The present fictional Silverleaf Clinic finding instead needs “Restore and test the application's approved availability or resilience controls.”, verified by “Authorized users can reach the service again after recovery.”.
D:That action addresses a different network issue: A home router's guest SSID uses a simple dictionary password printed publicly in a lobby and the owner thinks a strong encryption algorithm makes it safe. The present fictional Silverleaf Clinic finding instead needs “Restore and test the application's approved availability or resilience controls.”, verified by “Authorized users can reach the service again after recovery.”.
Question 930
An incident reviewer analyzes this observation: At the fictional Silverleaf Clinic after a site connectivity report, the team observes: A vital help-desk application is inaccessible after a power failure but its data is secret and unaltered; an analyst says the CIA triad shows no issue. What is the MOST specific underlying cause?
- Availability is compromised when authorized users cannot access a required service.
- Firewall decisions depend on protocol and port, and blocking HTTP 80 alone does not block all secure web traffic.
- Stateful firewalls can track permitted sessions and allow legitimate return traffic according to policy.
- WEP is obsolete and insecure compared with modern WPA2 or WPA3 options.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:Correct. This mechanism fits the observed network symptom at the fictional Silverleaf Clinic: Availability is compromised when authorized users cannot access a required service. The corresponding remedy is “Restore and test the application's approved availability or resilience controls.”. Confirmation: Authorized users can reach the service again after recovery.
Incorrect Answers
B:That cause belongs to a different case: A team blocks TCP port 80 but claims that every possible web application is unreachable even though HTTPS uses TCP 443. The observed fictional Silverleaf Clinic condition is specifically explained by “Availability is compromised when authorized users cannot access a required service.”.
C:That cause belongs to a different case: A branch firewall permits DNS queries to a resolver but blocks corresponding response packets because the team treats every return packet as a new unrelated inbound flow. The observed fictional Silverleaf Clinic condition is specifically explained by “Availability is compromised when authorized users cannot access a required service.”.
D:That cause belongs to a different case: A home router still uses WEP for Wi-Fi security because its owner thinks WEP and WPA3 offer equivalent protection. The observed fictional Silverleaf Clinic condition is specifically explained by “Availability is compromised when authorized users cannot access a required service.”.