Cisco Certified Support Technician (CCST) Networking 100-150 Practice Test 91
Question 900
Before approving the action, review: At the fictional Kestrel Regional Office while assessing a controlled network fault, the team observes: A firewall denies a needed remote desktop session and a technician disables the firewall entirely to make one connection work. During “Add or correct the approved rule for the specific managed endpoint and RDP service as policy allows.”, which precaution MOST specifically prevents a related risk?
- Do not reuse easy-to-guess or publicly displayed shared WLAN passwords.
- Do not retain WEP on a modern home WLAN as an equivalent alternative to WPA2 or WPA3.
- Do not disable the whole firewall to fix one RDP access requirement.
- Do not assume WPA encryption automatically segments guest devices from trusted LAN hosts.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:Correct. This precaution prevents a second fault while applying “Add or correct the approved rule for the specific managed endpoint and RDP service as policy allows.” at the fictional Kestrel Regional Office. The required protection is “Do not disable the whole firewall to fix one RDP access requirement.”; success still requires “The authorized support host connects while unrelated inbound attempts remain denied.”.
Incorrect Answers
A:This caution is appropriate for a separate failure pattern: A home router's guest SSID uses a simple dictionary password printed publicly in a lobby and the owner thinks a strong encryption algorithm makes it safe. The principal adjacent risk here is controlled by “Do not disable the whole firewall to fix one RDP access requirement.”.
B:This caution is appropriate for a separate failure pattern: A home router still uses WEP for Wi-Fi security because its owner thinks WEP and WPA3 offer equivalent protection. The principal adjacent risk here is controlled by “Do not disable the whole firewall to fix one RDP access requirement.”.
D:This caution is appropriate for a separate failure pattern: A guest SSID shares the same unrestricted local LAN access as private home PCs even though guests should have internet-only access. The principal adjacent risk here is controlled by “Do not disable the whole firewall to fix one RDP access requirement.”.
Question 901
A technician reviews the following issue: At the fictional Ridgecrest Service Desk after a site connectivity report, the team observes: A company configures source NAT at its border and assumes NAT alone blocks every hostile inbound packet as a complete security policy. Which action MOST directly resolves the reported issue?
- Enable supported guest network isolation and test access restrictions separately from WPA authentication.
- Verify firewall permit/deny rules separately from the NAT translation behavior.
- Require an approved complex unique password and a separate supported factor such as an authenticator or hardware security key.
- Report the message, verify the destination independently and follow the credential-incident response procedure.
Explanation
Correct Answer
B:Correct. In the fictional Ridgecrest Service Desk case, Network address translation changes addressing and does not replace explicit traffic-filtering controls. The specified corrective action, “Verify firewall permit/deny rules separately from the NAT translation behavior.”, directly targets that condition. Evidence of resolution: The edge applies the intended NAT and independently enforces inbound traffic policy.
Incorrect Answers
A:That action addresses a different network issue: A guest SSID shares the same unrestricted local LAN access as private home PCs even though guests should have internet-only access. The present fictional Ridgecrest Service Desk finding instead needs “Verify firewall permit/deny rules separately from the NAT translation behavior.”, verified by “The edge applies the intended NAT and independently enforces inbound traffic policy.”.
C:That action addresses a different network issue: A user authenticates to a critical application with a shared dictionary password and a security question, and the team calls that strong multifactor authentication. The present fictional Ridgecrest Service Desk finding instead needs “Verify firewall permit/deny rules separately from the NAT translation behavior.”, verified by “The edge applies the intended NAT and independently enforces inbound traffic policy.”.
D:That action addresses a different network issue: A workstation accepts a phishing email asking the user to enter a company password into a lookalike website. The present fictional Ridgecrest Service Desk finding instead needs “Verify firewall permit/deny rules separately from the NAT translation behavior.”, verified by “The edge applies the intended NAT and independently enforces inbound traffic policy.”.
Question 902
An incident reviewer analyzes this observation: At the fictional Ridgecrest Service Desk after a site connectivity report, the team observes: A company configures source NAT at its border and assumes NAT alone blocks every hostile inbound packet as a complete security policy. What is the MOST specific underlying cause?
- Network address translation changes addressing and does not replace explicit traffic-filtering controls.
- WPA2-Personal ordinarily authenticates with a shared passphrase, unlike Enterprise 802.1X credentials.
- Integrity requires detecting unauthorized content changes, independent of availability and readability.
- WPA protects wireless association but does not by itself enforce isolation between guest and trusted devices.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:Correct. This mechanism fits the observed network symptom at the fictional Ridgecrest Service Desk: Network address translation changes addressing and does not replace explicit traffic-filtering controls. The corresponding remedy is “Verify firewall permit/deny rules separately from the NAT translation behavior.”. Confirmation: The edge applies the intended NAT and independently enforces inbound traffic policy.
Incorrect Answers
B:That cause belongs to a different case: A family router is configured to WPA2-Personal but a technician asks every user to enter a corporate RADIUS username to connect. The observed fictional Ridgecrest Service Desk condition is specifically explained by “Network address translation changes addressing and does not replace explicit traffic-filtering controls.”.
C:That cause belongs to a different case: A firmware download is modified in transit but remains readable and available to technicians, who claim security is fully preserved. The observed fictional Ridgecrest Service Desk condition is specifically explained by “Network address translation changes addressing and does not replace explicit traffic-filtering controls.”.
D:That cause belongs to a different case: A guest SSID shares the same unrestricted local LAN access as private home PCs even though guests should have internet-only access. The observed fictional Ridgecrest Service Desk condition is specifically explained by “Network address translation changes addressing and does not replace explicit traffic-filtering controls.”.
Question 903
After an approved correction, the support team reviews: At the fictional Ridgecrest Service Desk after a site connectivity report, the team observes: A company configures source NAT at its border and assumes NAT alone blocks every hostile inbound packet as a complete security policy. The approved corrective action is: “Verify firewall permit/deny rules separately from the NAT translation behavior.” Which result BEST demonstrates success?
- Client security details show the approved stronger cipher and stable connectivity.
- Unauthorized accounts can no longer read the file while authorized staff retain access.
- Legitimate requests complete while abusive flood traffic is mitigated or absorbed.
- The edge applies the intended NAT and independently enforces inbound traffic policy.
Explanation
Correct Answer
D:Correct. This is the required observable acceptance evidence for “Verify firewall permit/deny rules separately from the NAT translation behavior.” at the fictional Ridgecrest Service Desk. It demonstrates correction of the original cause: Network address translation changes addressing and does not replace explicit traffic-filtering controls.
Incorrect Answers
A:That result is evidence for a separate corrective action, “Configure WPA2-Personal with AES-CCMP or a suitable WPA3 mode and disable legacy TKIP where supported.”. It does not establish the intended outcome “The edge applies the intended NAT and independently enforces inbound traffic policy.” for the fictional Ridgecrest Service Desk case.
B:That result is evidence for a separate corrective action, “Restrict access to approved identities and remove unintended public sharing.”. It does not establish the intended outcome “The edge applies the intended NAT and independently enforces inbound traffic policy.” for the fictional Ridgecrest Service Desk case.
C:That result is evidence for a separate corrective action, “Engage the approved DDoS mitigation and traffic-analysis process to restore access.”. It does not establish the intended outcome “The edge applies the intended NAT and independently enforces inbound traffic policy.” for the fictional Ridgecrest Service Desk case.
Question 904
Before approving the action, review: At the fictional Ridgecrest Service Desk after a site connectivity report, the team observes: A company configures source NAT at its border and assumes NAT alone blocks every hostile inbound packet as a complete security policy. During “Verify firewall permit/deny rules separately from the NAT translation behavior.”, which precaution MOST specifically prevents a related risk?
- Do not treat TKIP as the preferred modern cipher when AES-CCMP is supported.
- Do not run suspicious executable attachments to test whether they are harmless.
- Do not present NAT as a full substitute for a firewall rule set.
- Do not assume WPA encryption automatically segments guest devices from trusted LAN hosts.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:Correct. This precaution prevents a second fault while applying “Verify firewall permit/deny rules separately from the NAT translation behavior.” at the fictional Ridgecrest Service Desk. The required protection is “Do not present NAT as a full substitute for a firewall rule set.”; success still requires “The edge applies the intended NAT and independently enforces inbound traffic policy.”.
Incorrect Answers
A:This caution is appropriate for a separate failure pattern: A router owner selects WPA2 mode but explicitly forces outdated TKIP ciphers despite current clients supporting AES-CCMP. The principal adjacent risk here is controlled by “Do not present NAT as a full substitute for a firewall rule set.”.
B:This caution is appropriate for a separate failure pattern: An unpatched workstation runs an untrusted downloaded attachment that exploits a known vulnerability, encrypts user documents and demands payment. The principal adjacent risk here is controlled by “Do not present NAT as a full substitute for a firewall rule set.”.
D:This caution is appropriate for a separate failure pattern: A guest SSID shares the same unrestricted local LAN access as private home PCs even though guests should have internet-only access. The principal adjacent risk here is controlled by “Do not present NAT as a full substitute for a firewall rule set.”.
Question 905
A technician reviews the following issue: At the fictional Elmwood Guesthouse during its network support shift, the team observes: A firewall policy blocks one UDP service, but the analyst declares a separate TCP service blocked because both use the same numeric port. Which action MOST directly resolves the reported issue?
- Configure WPA2-Personal with AES-CCMP or a suitable WPA3 mode and disable legacy TKIP where supported.
- Verify whether the rule covers UDP, TCP or both for the specified destination port.
- Validate the server certificate chain, hostname and expiration before sending sensitive credentials.
- Use the appropriate WPA2-Personal passphrase settings for the home SSID.
Explanation
Correct Answer
B:Correct. In the fictional Elmwood Guesthouse case, Protocol and port must both be considered when matching a transport-level firewall rule. The specified corrective action, “Verify whether the rule covers UDP, TCP or both for the specified destination port.”, directly targets that condition. Evidence of resolution: Test results distinguish blocked UDP traffic from the separately permitted TCP connection.
Incorrect Answers
A:That action addresses a different network issue: A router owner selects WPA2 mode but explicitly forces outdated TKIP ciphers despite current clients supporting AES-CCMP. The present fictional Elmwood Guesthouse finding instead needs “Verify whether the rule covers UDP, TCP or both for the specified destination port.”, verified by “Test results distinguish blocked UDP traffic from the separately permitted TCP connection.”.
C:That action addresses a different network issue: A technician accepts a self-signed certificate for an unknown banking site because the connection says 'encrypted' and never checks its identity. The present fictional Elmwood Guesthouse finding instead needs “Verify whether the rule covers UDP, TCP or both for the specified destination port.”, verified by “Test results distinguish blocked UDP traffic from the separately permitted TCP connection.”.
D:That action addresses a different network issue: A family router is configured to WPA2-Personal but a technician asks every user to enter a corporate RADIUS username to connect. The present fictional Elmwood Guesthouse finding instead needs “Verify whether the rule covers UDP, TCP or both for the specified destination port.”, verified by “Test results distinguish blocked UDP traffic from the separately permitted TCP connection.”.
Question 906
An incident reviewer analyzes this observation: At the fictional Elmwood Guesthouse during its network support shift, the team observes: A firewall policy blocks one UDP service, but the analyst declares a separate TCP service blocked because both use the same numeric port. What is the MOST specific underlying cause?
- Protocol and port must both be considered when matching a transport-level firewall rule.
- WPA protects wireless association but does not by itself enforce isolation between guest and trusted devices.
- WPA3-Personal association requires compatible devices and security negotiation support.
- WLAN security mode must balance supported client capabilities without abandoning protection.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:Correct. This mechanism fits the observed network symptom at the fictional Elmwood Guesthouse: Protocol and port must both be considered when matching a transport-level firewall rule. The corresponding remedy is “Verify whether the rule covers UDP, TCP or both for the specified destination port.”. Confirmation: Test results distinguish blocked UDP traffic from the separately permitted TCP connection.
Incorrect Answers
B:That cause belongs to a different case: A guest SSID shares the same unrestricted local LAN access as private home PCs even though guests should have internet-only access. The observed fictional Elmwood Guesthouse condition is specifically explained by “Protocol and port must both be considered when matching a transport-level firewall rule.”.
C:That cause belongs to a different case: A household enables a WPA3-Personal-only SSID and a technician expects old WPA2-only radios to join with no compatibility check. The observed fictional Elmwood Guesthouse condition is specifically explained by “Protocol and port must both be considered when matching a transport-level firewall rule.”.
D:That cause belongs to a different case: A router supports WPA3-Personal but a legacy IoT sensor cannot associate; the installer proposes disabling wireless encryption for everyone. The observed fictional Elmwood Guesthouse condition is specifically explained by “Protocol and port must both be considered when matching a transport-level firewall rule.”.
Question 907
After an approved correction, the support team reviews: At the fictional Elmwood Guesthouse during its network support shift, the team observes: A firewall policy blocks one UDP service, but the analyst declares a separate TCP service blocked because both use the same numeric port. The approved corrective action is: “Verify whether the rule covers UDP, TCP or both for the specified destination port.” Which result BEST demonstrates success?
- WPA3-capable devices join the protected network and unsupported clients receive documented alternatives.
- Authorized users can reach the service again after recovery.
- Unauthorized accounts can no longer read the file while authorized staff retain access.
- Test results distinguish blocked UDP traffic from the separately permitted TCP connection.
Explanation
Correct Answer
D:Correct. This is the required observable acceptance evidence for “Verify whether the rule covers UDP, TCP or both for the specified destination port.” at the fictional Elmwood Guesthouse. It demonstrates correction of the original cause: Protocol and port must both be considered when matching a transport-level firewall rule.
Incorrect Answers
A:That result is evidence for a separate corrective action, “Check client WPA3 capabilities or create a separately protected compatible SSID under policy.”. It does not establish the intended outcome “Test results distinguish blocked UDP traffic from the separately permitted TCP connection.” for the fictional Elmwood Guesthouse case.
B:That result is evidence for a separate corrective action, “Restore and test the application's approved availability or resilience controls.”. It does not establish the intended outcome “Test results distinguish blocked UDP traffic from the separately permitted TCP connection.” for the fictional Elmwood Guesthouse case.
C:That result is evidence for a separate corrective action, “Restrict access to approved identities and remove unintended public sharing.”. It does not establish the intended outcome “Test results distinguish blocked UDP traffic from the separately permitted TCP connection.” for the fictional Elmwood Guesthouse case.
Question 908
Before approving the action, review: At the fictional Elmwood Guesthouse during its network support shift, the team observes: A firewall policy blocks one UDP service, but the analyst declares a separate TCP service blocked because both use the same numeric port. During “Verify whether the rule covers UDP, TCP or both for the specified destination port.”, which precaution MOST specifically prevents a related risk?
- Do not count a password and a security question as two independent MFA factor types.
- Do not ignore loss of availability simply because confidentiality and integrity appear intact.
- Do not assume a UDP-port deny automatically covers TCP with the same number.
- Do not confuse WPA2-Personal shared-key access with WPA2-Enterprise RADIUS authentication.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:Correct. This precaution prevents a second fault while applying “Verify whether the rule covers UDP, TCP or both for the specified destination port.” at the fictional Elmwood Guesthouse. The required protection is “Do not assume a UDP-port deny automatically covers TCP with the same number.”; success still requires “Test results distinguish blocked UDP traffic from the separately permitted TCP connection.”.
Incorrect Answers
A:This caution is appropriate for a separate failure pattern: A user authenticates to a critical application with a shared dictionary password and a security question, and the team calls that strong multifactor authentication. The principal adjacent risk here is controlled by “Do not assume a UDP-port deny automatically covers TCP with the same number.”.
B:This caution is appropriate for a separate failure pattern: A vital help-desk application is inaccessible after a power failure but its data is secret and unaltered; an analyst says the CIA triad shows no issue. The principal adjacent risk here is controlled by “Do not assume a UDP-port deny automatically covers TCP with the same number.”.
D:This caution is appropriate for a separate failure pattern: A family router is configured to WPA2-Personal but a technician asks every user to enter a corporate RADIUS username to connect. The principal adjacent risk here is controlled by “Do not assume a UDP-port deny automatically covers TCP with the same number.”.
Question 909
A technician reviews the following issue: At the fictional Northpoint Library before a planned system change, the team observes: A small-business network has a legitimate ICMP troubleshooting requirement but a default deny policy silently drops every echo request and the help desk calls the host dead. Which action MOST directly resolves the reported issue?
- Report the message, verify the destination independently and follow the credential-incident response procedure.
- Check the ICMP policy and use appropriately authorized probes or application tests.
- Verify the firmware's trusted signature or approved checksum before installation.
- Select a supported WPA2-Personal AES or WPA3-Personal mode according to client compatibility.
Explanation
Correct Answer
B:Correct. In the fictional Northpoint Library case, Firewalls can intentionally block ICMP echo, which affects diagnostic observations without necessarily breaking other services. The specified corrective action, “Check the ICMP policy and use appropriately authorized probes or application tests.”, directly targets that condition. Evidence of resolution: The report explains the ping failure under firewall policy while the legitimate application is tested separately.
Incorrect Answers
A:That action addresses a different network issue: A workstation accepts a phishing email asking the user to enter a company password into a lookalike website. The present fictional Northpoint Library finding instead needs “Check the ICMP policy and use appropriately authorized probes or application tests.”, verified by “The report explains the ping failure under firewall policy while the legitimate application is tested separately.”.
C:That action addresses a different network issue: A firmware download is modified in transit but remains readable and available to technicians, who claim security is fully preserved. The present fictional Northpoint Library finding instead needs “Check the ICMP policy and use appropriately authorized probes or application tests.”, verified by “The report explains the ping failure under firewall policy while the legitimate application is tested separately.”.
D:That action addresses a different network issue: A home router still uses WEP for Wi-Fi security because its owner thinks WEP and WPA3 offer equivalent protection. The present fictional Northpoint Library finding instead needs “Check the ICMP policy and use appropriately authorized probes or application tests.”, verified by “The report explains the ping failure under firewall policy while the legitimate application is tested separately.”.
Question 910
An incident reviewer analyzes this observation: At the fictional Northpoint Library before a planned system change, the team observes: A small-business network has a legitimate ICMP troubleshooting requirement but a default deny policy silently drops every echo request and the help desk calls the host dead. What is the MOST specific underlying cause?
- Firewalls can intentionally block ICMP echo, which affects diagnostic observations without necessarily breaking other services.
- Accounting or auditing in AAA records actions and ties them to authenticated identities and times.
- Integrity requires detecting unauthorized content changes, independent of availability and readability.
- WLAN security mode must balance supported client capabilities without abandoning protection.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:Correct. This mechanism fits the observed network symptom at the fictional Northpoint Library: Firewalls can intentionally block ICMP echo, which affects diagnostic observations without necessarily breaking other services. The corresponding remedy is “Check the ICMP policy and use appropriately authorized probes or application tests.”. Confirmation: The report explains the ping failure under firewall policy while the legitimate application is tested separately.
Incorrect Answers
B:That cause belongs to a different case: A support engineer investigates an unauthorized router change but the system logs no record of which administrator made it. The observed fictional Northpoint Library condition is specifically explained by “Firewalls can intentionally block ICMP echo, which affects diagnostic observations without necessarily breaking other services.”.
C:That cause belongs to a different case: A firmware download is modified in transit but remains readable and available to technicians, who claim security is fully preserved. The observed fictional Northpoint Library condition is specifically explained by “Firewalls can intentionally block ICMP echo, which affects diagnostic observations without necessarily breaking other services.”.
D:That cause belongs to a different case: A router supports WPA3-Personal but a legacy IoT sensor cannot associate; the installer proposes disabling wireless encryption for everyone. The observed fictional Northpoint Library condition is specifically explained by “Firewalls can intentionally block ICMP echo, which affects diagnostic observations without necessarily breaking other services.”.