Cisco Certified Support Technician (CCST) Networking 100-150 Practice Test 97
Question 960
Before approving the action, review: At the fictional Crescent Community Center during a scheduled lab validation, the team observes: A technician accepts a self-signed certificate for an unknown banking site because the connection says 'encrypted' and never checks its identity. During “Validate the server certificate chain, hostname and expiration before sending sensitive credentials.”, which precaution MOST specifically prevents a related risk?
- Do not leave an unrestricted inbound any-to-any permit when only one service is required.
- Do not leave IPv6 access unrestricted solely because IPv4 rules exist.
- Do not override certificate identity warnings for sensitive logins without authorized investigation.
- Do not present NAT as a full substitute for a firewall rule set.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:Correct. This precaution prevents a second fault while applying “Validate the server certificate chain, hostname and expiration before sending sensitive credentials.” at the fictional Crescent Community Center. The required protection is “Do not override certificate identity warnings for sensitive logins without authorized investigation.”; success still requires “The client connects only when the certificate identifies the expected service through trusted verification.”.
Incorrect Answers
A:This caution is appropriate for a separate failure pattern: A home router permits unsolicited inbound traffic to an internal web server after an unreviewed any-to-any firewall rule is installed. The principal adjacent risk here is controlled by “Do not override certificate identity warnings for sensitive logins without authorized investigation.”.
B:This caution is appropriate for a separate failure pattern: An office applies IPv4 firewall rules and assumes they automatically protect an enabled IPv6 interface with a separate policy stack. The principal adjacent risk here is controlled by “Do not override certificate identity warnings for sensitive logins without authorized investigation.”.
D:This caution is appropriate for a separate failure pattern: A company configures source NAT at its border and assumes NAT alone blocks every hostile inbound packet as a complete security policy. The principal adjacent risk here is controlled by “Do not override certificate identity warnings for sensitive logins without authorized investigation.”.
Question 961
A technician reviews the following issue: At the fictional Willowbrook Campus during its network support shift, the team observes: A home router still uses WEP for Wi-Fi security because its owner thinks WEP and WPA3 offer equivalent protection. Which action MOST directly resolves the reported issue?
- Validate the server certificate chain, hostname and expiration before sending sensitive credentials.
- Select a supported WPA2-Personal AES or WPA3-Personal mode according to client compatibility.
- Restore and test the application's approved availability or resilience controls.
- Verify the firmware's trusted signature or approved checksum before installation.
Explanation
Correct Answer
B:Correct. In the fictional Willowbrook Campus case, WEP is obsolete and insecure compared with modern WPA2 or WPA3 options. The specified corrective action, “Select a supported WPA2-Personal AES or WPA3-Personal mode according to client compatibility.”, directly targets that condition. Evidence of resolution: Authorized clients join using the stronger approved mode and WEP is disabled.
Incorrect Answers
A:That action addresses a different network issue: A technician accepts a self-signed certificate for an unknown banking site because the connection says 'encrypted' and never checks its identity. The present fictional Willowbrook Campus finding instead needs “Select a supported WPA2-Personal AES or WPA3-Personal mode according to client compatibility.”, verified by “Authorized clients join using the stronger approved mode and WEP is disabled.”.
C:That action addresses a different network issue: A vital help-desk application is inaccessible after a power failure but its data is secret and unaltered; an analyst says the CIA triad shows no issue. The present fictional Willowbrook Campus finding instead needs “Select a supported WPA2-Personal AES or WPA3-Personal mode according to client compatibility.”, verified by “Authorized clients join using the stronger approved mode and WEP is disabled.”.
D:That action addresses a different network issue: A firmware download is modified in transit but remains readable and available to technicians, who claim security is fully preserved. The present fictional Willowbrook Campus finding instead needs “Select a supported WPA2-Personal AES or WPA3-Personal mode according to client compatibility.”, verified by “Authorized clients join using the stronger approved mode and WEP is disabled.”.
Question 962
An incident reviewer analyzes this observation: At the fictional Willowbrook Campus during its network support shift, the team observes: A home router still uses WEP for Wi-Fi security because its owner thinks WEP and WPA3 offer equivalent protection. What is the MOST specific underlying cause?
- WEP is obsolete and insecure compared with modern WPA2 or WPA3 options.
- Stateful firewalls can track permitted sessions and allow legitimate return traffic according to policy.
- Integrity requires detecting unauthorized content changes, independent of availability and readability.
- Encryption alone does not establish that a server certificate is trusted and valid for the intended hostname.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:Correct. This mechanism fits the observed network symptom at the fictional Willowbrook Campus: WEP is obsolete and insecure compared with modern WPA2 or WPA3 options. The corresponding remedy is “Select a supported WPA2-Personal AES or WPA3-Personal mode according to client compatibility.”. Confirmation: Authorized clients join using the stronger approved mode and WEP is disabled.
Incorrect Answers
B:That cause belongs to a different case: A branch firewall permits DNS queries to a resolver but blocks corresponding response packets because the team treats every return packet as a new unrelated inbound flow. The observed fictional Willowbrook Campus condition is specifically explained by “WEP is obsolete and insecure compared with modern WPA2 or WPA3 options.”.
C:That cause belongs to a different case: A firmware download is modified in transit but remains readable and available to technicians, who claim security is fully preserved. The observed fictional Willowbrook Campus condition is specifically explained by “WEP is obsolete and insecure compared with modern WPA2 or WPA3 options.”.
D:That cause belongs to a different case: A technician accepts a self-signed certificate for an unknown banking site because the connection says 'encrypted' and never checks its identity. The observed fictional Willowbrook Campus condition is specifically explained by “WEP is obsolete and insecure compared with modern WPA2 or WPA3 options.”.
Question 963
After an approved correction, the support team reviews: At the fictional Willowbrook Campus during its network support shift, the team observes: A home router still uses WEP for Wi-Fi security because its owner thinks WEP and WPA3 offer equivalent protection. The approved corrective action is: “Select a supported WPA2-Personal AES or WPA3-Personal mode according to client compatibility.” Which result BEST demonstrates success?
- Guest traffic is denied while separately approved internet access still works.
- The same approved security intent is enforced for both active address families.
- The client connects only when the certificate identifies the expected service through trusted verification.
- Authorized clients join using the stronger approved mode and WEP is disabled.
Explanation
Correct Answer
D:Correct. This is the required observable acceptance evidence for “Select a supported WPA2-Personal AES or WPA3-Personal mode according to client compatibility.” at the fictional Willowbrook Campus. It demonstrates correction of the original cause: WEP is obsolete and insecure compared with modern WPA2 or WPA3 options.
Incorrect Answers
A:That result is evidence for a separate corrective action, “Place and validate the guest-to-accounting deny in the effective evaluated policy order.”. It does not establish the intended outcome “Authorized clients join using the stronger approved mode and WEP is disabled.” for the fictional Willowbrook Campus case.
B:That result is evidence for a separate corrective action, “Review effective IPv6 filtering rules and test the intended deny/allow behavior.”. It does not establish the intended outcome “Authorized clients join using the stronger approved mode and WEP is disabled.” for the fictional Willowbrook Campus case.
C:That result is evidence for a separate corrective action, “Validate the server certificate chain, hostname and expiration before sending sensitive credentials.”. It does not establish the intended outcome “Authorized clients join using the stronger approved mode and WEP is disabled.” for the fictional Willowbrook Campus case.
Question 964
Before approving the action, review: At the fictional Willowbrook Campus during its network support shift, the team observes: A home router still uses WEP for Wi-Fi security because its owner thinks WEP and WPA3 offer equivalent protection. During “Select a supported WPA2-Personal AES or WPA3-Personal mode according to client compatibility.”, which precaution MOST specifically prevents a related risk?
- Do not use shared unlogged administrator accounts when action accountability is required.
- Do not rely on a rule that is shadowed by an earlier broader permit.
- Do not retain WEP on a modern home WLAN as an equivalent alternative to WPA2 or WPA3.
- Do not add an any-to-any allow rule without first identifying the actual denied flow.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:Correct. This precaution prevents a second fault while applying “Select a supported WPA2-Personal AES or WPA3-Personal mode according to client compatibility.” at the fictional Willowbrook Campus. The required protection is “Do not retain WEP on a modern home WLAN as an equivalent alternative to WPA2 or WPA3.”; success still requires “Authorized clients join using the stronger approved mode and WEP is disabled.”.
Incorrect Answers
A:This caution is appropriate for a separate failure pattern: A support engineer investigates an unauthorized router change but the system logs no record of which administrator made it. The principal adjacent risk here is controlled by “Do not retain WEP on a modern home WLAN as an equivalent alternative to WPA2 or WPA3.”.
B:This caution is appropriate for a separate failure pattern: A guest Wi-Fi network must be blocked from the accounting subnet but a technician places an allow-all rule before a later deny and assumes the deny overrides it. The principal adjacent risk here is controlled by “Do not retain WEP on a modern home WLAN as an equivalent alternative to WPA2 or WPA3.”.
D:This caution is appropriate for a separate failure pattern: A help desk hears that a firewall dropped traffic but records no source, destination, direction or rule identifier. The principal adjacent risk here is controlled by “Do not retain WEP on a modern home WLAN as an equivalent alternative to WPA2 or WPA3.”.
Question 965
A technician reviews the following issue: At the fictional Junction Student Center before a planned system change, the team observes: A family router is configured to WPA2-Personal but a technician asks every user to enter a corporate RADIUS username to connect. Which action MOST directly resolves the reported issue?
- Verify firewall permit/deny rules separately from the NAT translation behavior.
- Use the appropriate WPA2-Personal passphrase settings for the home SSID.
- Restrict access to approved identities and remove unintended public sharing.
- Distinguish the successful directory authentication from the later VLAN access-control decision in the logs.
Explanation
Correct Answer
B:Correct. In the fictional Junction Student Center case, WPA2-Personal ordinarily authenticates with a shared passphrase, unlike Enterprise 802.1X credentials. The specified corrective action, “Use the appropriate WPA2-Personal passphrase settings for the home SSID.”, directly targets that condition. Evidence of resolution: Home devices connect using the approved shared secret without an enterprise identity server.
Incorrect Answers
A:That action addresses a different network issue: A company configures source NAT at its border and assumes NAT alone blocks every hostile inbound packet as a complete security policy. The present fictional Junction Student Center finding instead needs “Use the appropriate WPA2-Personal passphrase settings for the home SSID.”, verified by “Home devices connect using the approved shared secret without an enterprise identity server.”.
C:That action addresses a different network issue: A confidential payroll file is posted on a public share and the team celebrates because nobody has changed its contents. The present fictional Junction Student Center finding instead needs “Use the appropriate WPA2-Personal passphrase settings for the home SSID.”, verified by “Home devices connect using the approved shared secret without an enterprise identity server.”.
D:That action addresses a different network issue: A corporate Wi-Fi admin verifies a user's password against Active Directory but the authorization policy still denies a restricted VLAN; the team calls the two steps identical. The present fictional Junction Student Center finding instead needs “Use the appropriate WPA2-Personal passphrase settings for the home SSID.”, verified by “Home devices connect using the approved shared secret without an enterprise identity server.”.
Question 966
An incident reviewer analyzes this observation: At the fictional Junction Student Center before a planned system change, the team observes: A family router is configured to WPA2-Personal but a technician asks every user to enter a corporate RADIUS username to connect. What is the MOST specific underlying cause?
- WPA2-Personal ordinarily authenticates with a shared passphrase, unlike Enterprise 802.1X credentials.
- One narrow access problem should be solved with scoped least-privilege policy rather than removing the security boundary.
- Network address translation changes addressing and does not replace explicit traffic-filtering controls.
- Strong unique password policy addresses guessability; MFA additionally requires independent factors rather than two knowledge-factor answers.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:Correct. This mechanism fits the observed network symptom at the fictional Junction Student Center: WPA2-Personal ordinarily authenticates with a shared passphrase, unlike Enterprise 802.1X credentials. The corresponding remedy is “Use the appropriate WPA2-Personal passphrase settings for the home SSID.”. Confirmation: Home devices connect using the approved shared secret without an enterprise identity server.
Incorrect Answers
B:That cause belongs to a different case: A firewall denies a needed remote desktop session and a technician disables the firewall entirely to make one connection work. The observed fictional Junction Student Center condition is specifically explained by “WPA2-Personal ordinarily authenticates with a shared passphrase, unlike Enterprise 802.1X credentials.”.
C:That cause belongs to a different case: A company configures source NAT at its border and assumes NAT alone blocks every hostile inbound packet as a complete security policy. The observed fictional Junction Student Center condition is specifically explained by “WPA2-Personal ordinarily authenticates with a shared passphrase, unlike Enterprise 802.1X credentials.”.
D:That cause belongs to a different case: A user authenticates to a critical application with a shared dictionary password and a security question, and the team calls that strong multifactor authentication. The observed fictional Junction Student Center condition is specifically explained by “WPA2-Personal ordinarily authenticates with a shared passphrase, unlike Enterprise 802.1X credentials.”.
Question 967
After an approved correction, the support team reviews: At the fictional Junction Student Center before a planned system change, the team observes: A family router is configured to WPA2-Personal but a technician asks every user to enter a corporate RADIUS username to connect. The approved corrective action is: “Use the appropriate WPA2-Personal passphrase settings for the home SSID.” Which result BEST demonstrates success?
- Unauthorized accounts can no longer read the file while authorized staff retain access.
- The documented decision maps the denied flow to a policy rule that can be reviewed.
- The login rejects weak reused passwords and requires two distinct qualifying factor types for sensitive access.
- Home devices connect using the approved shared secret without an enterprise identity server.
Explanation
Correct Answer
D:Correct. This is the required observable acceptance evidence for “Use the appropriate WPA2-Personal passphrase settings for the home SSID.” at the fictional Junction Student Center. It demonstrates correction of the original cause: WPA2-Personal ordinarily authenticates with a shared passphrase, unlike Enterprise 802.1X credentials.
Incorrect Answers
A:That result is evidence for a separate corrective action, “Restrict access to approved identities and remove unintended public sharing.”. It does not establish the intended outcome “Home devices connect using the approved shared secret without an enterprise identity server.” for the fictional Junction Student Center case.
B:That result is evidence for a separate corrective action, “Inspect permitted firewall logs for source/destination IP, ports, protocol, direction and matched rule.”. It does not establish the intended outcome “Home devices connect using the approved shared secret without an enterprise identity server.” for the fictional Junction Student Center case.
C:That result is evidence for a separate corrective action, “Require an approved complex unique password and a separate supported factor such as an authenticator or hardware security key.”. It does not establish the intended outcome “Home devices connect using the approved shared secret without an enterprise identity server.” for the fictional Junction Student Center case.
Question 968
Before approving the action, review: At the fictional Junction Student Center before a planned system change, the team observes: A family router is configured to WPA2-Personal but a technician asks every user to enter a corporate RADIUS username to connect. During “Use the appropriate WPA2-Personal passphrase settings for the home SSID.”, which precaution MOST specifically prevents a related risk?
- Do not present NAT as a full substitute for a firewall rule set.
- Do not leave an unrestricted inbound any-to-any permit when only one service is required.
- Do not confuse WPA2-Personal shared-key access with WPA2-Enterprise RADIUS authentication.
- Do not open all inbound ports merely to allow responses to established requests.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:Correct. This precaution prevents a second fault while applying “Use the appropriate WPA2-Personal passphrase settings for the home SSID.” at the fictional Junction Student Center. The required protection is “Do not confuse WPA2-Personal shared-key access with WPA2-Enterprise RADIUS authentication.”; success still requires “Home devices connect using the approved shared secret without an enterprise identity server.”.
Incorrect Answers
A:This caution is appropriate for a separate failure pattern: A company configures source NAT at its border and assumes NAT alone blocks every hostile inbound packet as a complete security policy. The principal adjacent risk here is controlled by “Do not confuse WPA2-Personal shared-key access with WPA2-Enterprise RADIUS authentication.”.
B:This caution is appropriate for a separate failure pattern: A home router permits unsolicited inbound traffic to an internal web server after an unreviewed any-to-any firewall rule is installed. The principal adjacent risk here is controlled by “Do not confuse WPA2-Personal shared-key access with WPA2-Enterprise RADIUS authentication.”.
D:This caution is appropriate for a separate failure pattern: A branch firewall permits DNS queries to a resolver but blocks corresponding response packets because the team treats every return packet as a new unrelated inbound flow. The principal adjacent risk here is controlled by “Do not confuse WPA2-Personal shared-key access with WPA2-Enterprise RADIUS authentication.”.
Question 969
A technician reviews the following issue: At the fictional Bramble Insurance in a technician onboarding review, the team observes: A small company needs individual user credentials and revocation on its secure WLAN but sets only one shared home Wi-Fi password for all employees. Which action MOST directly resolves the reported issue?
- Validate the server certificate chain, hostname and expiration before sending sensitive credentials.
- Evaluate WPA2-Enterprise or WPA3-Enterprise with an approved authentication service.
- Check the ICMP policy and use appropriately authorized probes or application tests.
- Verify firewall permit/deny rules separately from the NAT translation behavior.
Explanation
Correct Answer
B:Correct. In the fictional Bramble Insurance case, Enterprise WLAN authentication can integrate 802.1X and RADIUS for per-user identity control. The specified corrective action, “Evaluate WPA2-Enterprise or WPA3-Enterprise with an approved authentication service.”, directly targets that condition. Evidence of resolution: A revoked user account loses network access without changing every other user's credential.
Incorrect Answers
A:That action addresses a different network issue: A technician accepts a self-signed certificate for an unknown banking site because the connection says 'encrypted' and never checks its identity. The present fictional Bramble Insurance finding instead needs “Evaluate WPA2-Enterprise or WPA3-Enterprise with an approved authentication service.”, verified by “A revoked user account loses network access without changing every other user's credential.”.
C:That action addresses a different network issue: A small-business network has a legitimate ICMP troubleshooting requirement but a default deny policy silently drops every echo request and the help desk calls the host dead. The present fictional Bramble Insurance finding instead needs “Evaluate WPA2-Enterprise or WPA3-Enterprise with an approved authentication service.”, verified by “A revoked user account loses network access without changing every other user's credential.”.
D:That action addresses a different network issue: A company configures source NAT at its border and assumes NAT alone blocks every hostile inbound packet as a complete security policy. The present fictional Bramble Insurance finding instead needs “Evaluate WPA2-Enterprise or WPA3-Enterprise with an approved authentication service.”, verified by “A revoked user account loses network access without changing every other user's credential.”.
Question 970
An incident reviewer analyzes this observation: At the fictional Bramble Insurance in a technician onboarding review, the team observes: A small company needs individual user credentials and revocation on its secure WLAN but sets only one shared home Wi-Fi password for all employees. What is the MOST specific underlying cause?
- Enterprise WLAN authentication can integrate 802.1X and RADIUS for per-user identity control.
- Phishing uses deceptive messages and impersonation to steal credentials or induce unsafe actions.
- Availability is compromised when authorized users cannot access a required service.
- Authentication can verify an identity in a directory such as Active Directory, while authorization separately decides the user's permitted resources.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:Correct. This mechanism fits the observed network symptom at the fictional Bramble Insurance: Enterprise WLAN authentication can integrate 802.1X and RADIUS for per-user identity control. The corresponding remedy is “Evaluate WPA2-Enterprise or WPA3-Enterprise with an approved authentication service.”. Confirmation: A revoked user account loses network access without changing every other user's credential.
Incorrect Answers
B:That cause belongs to a different case: A workstation accepts a phishing email asking the user to enter a company password into a lookalike website. The observed fictional Bramble Insurance condition is specifically explained by “Enterprise WLAN authentication can integrate 802.1X and RADIUS for per-user identity control.”.
C:That cause belongs to a different case: A vital help-desk application is inaccessible after a power failure but its data is secret and unaltered; an analyst says the CIA triad shows no issue. The observed fictional Bramble Insurance condition is specifically explained by “Enterprise WLAN authentication can integrate 802.1X and RADIUS for per-user identity control.”.
D:That cause belongs to a different case: A corporate Wi-Fi admin verifies a user's password against Active Directory but the authorization policy still denies a restricted VLAN; the team calls the two steps identical. The observed fictional Bramble Insurance condition is specifically explained by “Enterprise WLAN authentication can integrate 802.1X and RADIUS for per-user identity control.”.