Cisco Certified Support Technician (CCST) Networking 100-150 Practice Test 99
Question 980
Before approving the action, review: At the fictional Beacon Arts School after a user reports a recurring problem, the team observes: A router supports WPA3-Personal but a legacy IoT sensor cannot associate; the installer proposes disabling wireless encryption for everyone. During “Test a documented WPA2-AES compatibility SSID or isolate the legacy device while keeping strong security on other WLANs.”, which precaution MOST specifically prevents a related risk?
- Do not rely on a rule that is shadowed by an earlier broader permit.
- Do not present NAT as a full substitute for a firewall rule set.
- Do not turn the entire main WLAN into an open network for one incompatible device.
- Do not assume a UDP-port deny automatically covers TCP with the same number.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:Correct. This precaution prevents a second fault while applying “Test a documented WPA2-AES compatibility SSID or isolate the legacy device while keeping strong security on other WLANs.” at the fictional Beacon Arts School. The required protection is “Do not turn the entire main WLAN into an open network for one incompatible device.”; success still requires “The old client connects only to its constrained approved network and modern clients retain secure associations.”.
Incorrect Answers
A:This caution is appropriate for a separate failure pattern: A guest Wi-Fi network must be blocked from the accounting subnet but a technician places an allow-all rule before a later deny and assumes the deny overrides it. The principal adjacent risk here is controlled by “Do not turn the entire main WLAN into an open network for one incompatible device.”.
B:This caution is appropriate for a separate failure pattern: A company configures source NAT at its border and assumes NAT alone blocks every hostile inbound packet as a complete security policy. The principal adjacent risk here is controlled by “Do not turn the entire main WLAN into an open network for one incompatible device.”.
D:This caution is appropriate for a separate failure pattern: A firewall policy blocks one UDP service, but the analyst declares a separate TCP service blocked because both use the same numeric port. The principal adjacent risk here is controlled by “Do not turn the entire main WLAN into an open network for one incompatible device.”.
Question 981
A technician reviews the following issue: At the fictional Stonewater Manufacturing during a physical cabling audit, the team observes: A user configures a wireless router with a secure password but leaves WPS push-button or PIN onboarding unrestricted despite a policy requiring it off. Which action MOST directly resolves the reported issue?
- Place and validate the guest-to-accounting deny in the effective evaluated policy order.
- Disable WPS in the home router's supported security settings where policy requires it.
- Review effective IPv6 filtering rules and test the intended deny/allow behavior.
- Verify the firmware's trusted signature or approved checksum before installation.
Explanation
Correct Answer
B:Correct. In the fictional Stonewater Manufacturing case, Convenience onboarding features may expose an unnecessary route for unauthorized WLAN enrollment. The specified corrective action, “Disable WPS in the home router's supported security settings where policy requires it.”, directly targets that condition. Evidence of resolution: Routine WPA2 or WPA3 connections still work and WPS enrollment is unavailable.
Incorrect Answers
A:That action addresses a different network issue: A guest Wi-Fi network must be blocked from the accounting subnet but a technician places an allow-all rule before a later deny and assumes the deny overrides it. The present fictional Stonewater Manufacturing finding instead needs “Disable WPS in the home router's supported security settings where policy requires it.”, verified by “Routine WPA2 or WPA3 connections still work and WPS enrollment is unavailable.”.
C:That action addresses a different network issue: An office applies IPv4 firewall rules and assumes they automatically protect an enabled IPv6 interface with a separate policy stack. The present fictional Stonewater Manufacturing finding instead needs “Disable WPS in the home router's supported security settings where policy requires it.”, verified by “Routine WPA2 or WPA3 connections still work and WPS enrollment is unavailable.”.
D:That action addresses a different network issue: A firmware download is modified in transit but remains readable and available to technicians, who claim security is fully preserved. The present fictional Stonewater Manufacturing finding instead needs “Disable WPS in the home router's supported security settings where policy requires it.”, verified by “Routine WPA2 or WPA3 connections still work and WPS enrollment is unavailable.”.
Question 982
An incident reviewer analyzes this observation: At the fictional Stonewater Manufacturing during a physical cabling audit, the team observes: A user configures a wireless router with a secure password but leaves WPS push-button or PIN onboarding unrestricted despite a policy requiring it off. What is the MOST specific underlying cause?
- Convenience onboarding features may expose an unnecessary route for unauthorized WLAN enrollment.
- Authentication can verify an identity in a directory such as Active Directory, while authorization separately decides the user's permitted resources.
- Effective firewall troubleshooting requires identifying the actual flow and the specific rule or policy decision.
- Strong unique password policy addresses guessability; MFA additionally requires independent factors rather than two knowledge-factor answers.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:Correct. This mechanism fits the observed network symptom at the fictional Stonewater Manufacturing: Convenience onboarding features may expose an unnecessary route for unauthorized WLAN enrollment. The corresponding remedy is “Disable WPS in the home router's supported security settings where policy requires it.”. Confirmation: Routine WPA2 or WPA3 connections still work and WPS enrollment is unavailable.
Incorrect Answers
B:That cause belongs to a different case: A corporate Wi-Fi admin verifies a user's password against Active Directory but the authorization policy still denies a restricted VLAN; the team calls the two steps identical. The observed fictional Stonewater Manufacturing condition is specifically explained by “Convenience onboarding features may expose an unnecessary route for unauthorized WLAN enrollment.”.
C:That cause belongs to a different case: A help desk hears that a firewall dropped traffic but records no source, destination, direction or rule identifier. The observed fictional Stonewater Manufacturing condition is specifically explained by “Convenience onboarding features may expose an unnecessary route for unauthorized WLAN enrollment.”.
D:That cause belongs to a different case: A user authenticates to a critical application with a shared dictionary password and a security question, and the team calls that strong multifactor authentication. The observed fictional Stonewater Manufacturing condition is specifically explained by “Convenience onboarding features may expose an unnecessary route for unauthorized WLAN enrollment.”.
Question 983
After an approved correction, the support team reviews: At the fictional Stonewater Manufacturing during a physical cabling audit, the team observes: A user configures a wireless router with a secure password but leaves WPS push-button or PIN onboarding unrestricted despite a policy requiring it off. The approved corrective action is: “Disable WPS in the home router's supported security settings where policy requires it.” Which result BEST demonstrates success?
- Approved DNS requests receive replies without a broad unsolicited inbound permit.
- Test results distinguish blocked UDP traffic from the separately permitted TCP connection.
- The authorized support host connects while unrelated inbound attempts remain denied.
- Routine WPA2 or WPA3 connections still work and WPS enrollment is unavailable.
Explanation
Correct Answer
D:Correct. This is the required observable acceptance evidence for “Disable WPS in the home router's supported security settings where policy requires it.” at the fictional Stonewater Manufacturing. It demonstrates correction of the original cause: Convenience onboarding features may expose an unnecessary route for unauthorized WLAN enrollment.
Incorrect Answers
A:That result is evidence for a separate corrective action, “Check the stateful rule and session table for the authorized DNS exchange.”. It does not establish the intended outcome “Routine WPA2 or WPA3 connections still work and WPS enrollment is unavailable.” for the fictional Stonewater Manufacturing case.
B:That result is evidence for a separate corrective action, “Verify whether the rule covers UDP, TCP or both for the specified destination port.”. It does not establish the intended outcome “Routine WPA2 or WPA3 connections still work and WPS enrollment is unavailable.” for the fictional Stonewater Manufacturing case.
C:That result is evidence for a separate corrective action, “Add or correct the approved rule for the specific managed endpoint and RDP service as policy allows.”. It does not establish the intended outcome “Routine WPA2 or WPA3 connections still work and WPS enrollment is unavailable.” for the fictional Stonewater Manufacturing case.
Question 984
Before approving the action, review: At the fictional Stonewater Manufacturing during a physical cabling audit, the team observes: A user configures a wireless router with a secure password but leaves WPS push-button or PIN onboarding unrestricted despite a policy requiring it off. During “Disable WPS in the home router's supported security settings where policy requires it.”, which precaution MOST specifically prevents a related risk?
- Do not present NAT as a full substitute for a firewall rule set.
- Do not equate ICMP filtering with absence of the target host.
- Do not assume a strong WPA passphrase means all alternative onboarding paths are automatically disabled.
- Do not enter corporate credentials into a link sent by an unverified urgent email.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:Correct. This precaution prevents a second fault while applying “Disable WPS in the home router's supported security settings where policy requires it.” at the fictional Stonewater Manufacturing. The required protection is “Do not assume a strong WPA passphrase means all alternative onboarding paths are automatically disabled.”; success still requires “Routine WPA2 or WPA3 connections still work and WPS enrollment is unavailable.”.
Incorrect Answers
A:This caution is appropriate for a separate failure pattern: A company configures source NAT at its border and assumes NAT alone blocks every hostile inbound packet as a complete security policy. The principal adjacent risk here is controlled by “Do not assume a strong WPA passphrase means all alternative onboarding paths are automatically disabled.”.
B:This caution is appropriate for a separate failure pattern: A small-business network has a legitimate ICMP troubleshooting requirement but a default deny policy silently drops every echo request and the help desk calls the host dead. The principal adjacent risk here is controlled by “Do not assume a strong WPA passphrase means all alternative onboarding paths are automatically disabled.”.
D:This caution is appropriate for a separate failure pattern: A workstation accepts a phishing email asking the user to enter a company password into a lookalike website. The principal adjacent risk here is controlled by “Do not assume a strong WPA passphrase means all alternative onboarding paths are automatically disabled.”.
Question 985
A technician reviews the following issue: At the fictional Sunrise Payment Office during a scheduled lab validation, the team observes: A household enables a WPA3-Personal-only SSID and a technician expects old WPA2-only radios to join with no compatibility check. Which action MOST directly resolves the reported issue?
- Inspect permitted firewall logs for source/destination IP, ports, protocol, direction and matched rule.
- Check client WPA3 capabilities or create a separately protected compatible SSID under policy.
- Isolate the affected endpoint, correct the known exposure and follow the authorized malware incident and recovery playbook.
- Review and test the actual allowed HTTPS and blocked HTTP traffic separately.
Explanation
Correct Answer
B:Correct. In the fictional Sunrise Payment Office case, WPA3-Personal association requires compatible devices and security negotiation support. The specified corrective action, “Check client WPA3 capabilities or create a separately protected compatible SSID under policy.”, directly targets that condition. Evidence of resolution: WPA3-capable devices join the protected network and unsupported clients receive documented alternatives.
Incorrect Answers
A:That action addresses a different network issue: A help desk hears that a firewall dropped traffic but records no source, destination, direction or rule identifier. The present fictional Sunrise Payment Office finding instead needs “Check client WPA3 capabilities or create a separately protected compatible SSID under policy.”, verified by “WPA3-capable devices join the protected network and unsupported clients receive documented alternatives.”.
C:That action addresses a different network issue: An unpatched workstation runs an untrusted downloaded attachment that exploits a known vulnerability, encrypts user documents and demands payment. The present fictional Sunrise Payment Office finding instead needs “Check client WPA3 capabilities or create a separately protected compatible SSID under policy.”, verified by “WPA3-capable devices join the protected network and unsupported clients receive documented alternatives.”.
D:That action addresses a different network issue: A team blocks TCP port 80 but claims that every possible web application is unreachable even though HTTPS uses TCP 443. The present fictional Sunrise Payment Office finding instead needs “Check client WPA3 capabilities or create a separately protected compatible SSID under policy.”, verified by “WPA3-capable devices join the protected network and unsupported clients receive documented alternatives.”.
Question 986
An incident reviewer analyzes this observation: At the fictional Sunrise Payment Office during a scheduled lab validation, the team observes: A household enables a WPA3-Personal-only SSID and a technician expects old WPA2-only radios to join with no compatibility check. What is the MOST specific underlying cause?
- WPA3-Personal association requires compatible devices and security negotiation support.
- Firewalls can intentionally block ICMP echo, which affects diagnostic observations without necessarily breaking other services.
- Stateful firewalls can track permitted sessions and allow legitimate return traffic according to policy.
- An overly broad inbound permit rule exposes services beyond the intended protected application.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:Correct. This mechanism fits the observed network symptom at the fictional Sunrise Payment Office: WPA3-Personal association requires compatible devices and security negotiation support. The corresponding remedy is “Check client WPA3 capabilities or create a separately protected compatible SSID under policy.”. Confirmation: WPA3-capable devices join the protected network and unsupported clients receive documented alternatives.
Incorrect Answers
B:That cause belongs to a different case: A small-business network has a legitimate ICMP troubleshooting requirement but a default deny policy silently drops every echo request and the help desk calls the host dead. The observed fictional Sunrise Payment Office condition is specifically explained by “WPA3-Personal association requires compatible devices and security negotiation support.”.
C:That cause belongs to a different case: A branch firewall permits DNS queries to a resolver but blocks corresponding response packets because the team treats every return packet as a new unrelated inbound flow. The observed fictional Sunrise Payment Office condition is specifically explained by “WPA3-Personal association requires compatible devices and security negotiation support.”.
D:That cause belongs to a different case: A home router permits unsolicited inbound traffic to an internal web server after an unreviewed any-to-any firewall rule is installed. The observed fictional Sunrise Payment Office condition is specifically explained by “WPA3-Personal association requires compatible devices and security negotiation support.”.
Question 987
After an approved correction, the support team reviews: At the fictional Sunrise Payment Office during a scheduled lab validation, the team observes: A household enables a WPA3-Personal-only SSID and a technician expects old WPA2-only radios to join with no compatibility check. The approved corrective action is: “Check client WPA3 capabilities or create a separately protected compatible SSID under policy.” Which result BEST demonstrates success?
- The login rejects weak reused passwords and requires two distinct qualifying factor types for sensitive access.
- TCP 80 attempts are blocked while policy-approved TCP 443 sessions still succeed.
- The documented decision maps the denied flow to a policy rule that can be reviewed.
- WPA3-capable devices join the protected network and unsupported clients receive documented alternatives.
Explanation
Correct Answer
D:Correct. This is the required observable acceptance evidence for “Check client WPA3 capabilities or create a separately protected compatible SSID under policy.” at the fictional Sunrise Payment Office. It demonstrates correction of the original cause: WPA3-Personal association requires compatible devices and security negotiation support.
Incorrect Answers
A:That result is evidence for a separate corrective action, “Require an approved complex unique password and a separate supported factor such as an authenticator or hardware security key.”. It does not establish the intended outcome “WPA3-capable devices join the protected network and unsupported clients receive documented alternatives.” for the fictional Sunrise Payment Office case.
B:That result is evidence for a separate corrective action, “Review and test the actual allowed HTTPS and blocked HTTP traffic separately.”. It does not establish the intended outcome “WPA3-capable devices join the protected network and unsupported clients receive documented alternatives.” for the fictional Sunrise Payment Office case.
C:That result is evidence for a separate corrective action, “Inspect permitted firewall logs for source/destination IP, ports, protocol, direction and matched rule.”. It does not establish the intended outcome “WPA3-capable devices join the protected network and unsupported clients receive documented alternatives.” for the fictional Sunrise Payment Office case.
Question 988
Before approving the action, review: At the fictional Sunrise Payment Office during a scheduled lab validation, the team observes: A household enables a WPA3-Personal-only SSID and a technician expects old WPA2-only radios to join with no compatibility check. During “Check client WPA3 capabilities or create a separately protected compatible SSID under policy.”, which precaution MOST specifically prevents a related risk?
- Do not assume attacks require file theft or data modification to be security incidents.
- Do not count a password and a security question as two independent MFA factor types.
- Do not assume changing an SSID label upgrades a client radio to WPA3 support.
- Do not ignore loss of availability simply because confidentiality and integrity appear intact.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:Correct. This precaution prevents a second fault while applying “Check client WPA3 capabilities or create a separately protected compatible SSID under policy.” at the fictional Sunrise Payment Office. The required protection is “Do not assume changing an SSID label upgrades a client radio to WPA3 support.”; success still requires “WPA3-capable devices join the protected network and unsupported clients receive documented alternatives.”.
Incorrect Answers
A:This caution is appropriate for a separate failure pattern: A public website receives overwhelming request traffic that exhausts its service capacity, yet the data has not been stolen or changed. The principal adjacent risk here is controlled by “Do not assume changing an SSID label upgrades a client radio to WPA3 support.”.
B:This caution is appropriate for a separate failure pattern: A user authenticates to a critical application with a shared dictionary password and a security question, and the team calls that strong multifactor authentication. The principal adjacent risk here is controlled by “Do not assume changing an SSID label upgrades a client radio to WPA3 support.”.
D:This caution is appropriate for a separate failure pattern: A vital help-desk application is inaccessible after a power failure but its data is secret and unaltered; an analyst says the CIA triad shows no issue. The principal adjacent risk here is controlled by “Do not assume changing an SSID label upgrades a client radio to WPA3 support.”.
Question 989
A technician reviews the following issue: At the fictional Westport Transit Depot during basic configuration verification, the team observes: A parent turns off SSID broadcast and calls the Wi-Fi network fully encrypted even though the router security mode is open. Which action MOST directly resolves the reported issue?
- Validate the server certificate chain, hostname and expiration before sending sensitive credentials.
- Enable a supported WPA-Personal security mode and configure a protected passphrase.
- Review and test the actual allowed HTTPS and blocked HTTP traffic separately.
- Restore and test the application's approved availability or resilience controls.
Explanation
Correct Answer
B:Correct. In the fictional Westport Transit Depot case, Hiding the SSID does not replace WPA2 or WPA3 encryption and authentication. The specified corrective action, “Enable a supported WPA-Personal security mode and configure a protected passphrase.”, directly targets that condition. Evidence of resolution: The WLAN security details show actual authentication and encryption instead of merely a hidden name.
Incorrect Answers
A:That action addresses a different network issue: A technician accepts a self-signed certificate for an unknown banking site because the connection says 'encrypted' and never checks its identity. The present fictional Westport Transit Depot finding instead needs “Enable a supported WPA-Personal security mode and configure a protected passphrase.”, verified by “The WLAN security details show actual authentication and encryption instead of merely a hidden name.”.
C:That action addresses a different network issue: A team blocks TCP port 80 but claims that every possible web application is unreachable even though HTTPS uses TCP 443. The present fictional Westport Transit Depot finding instead needs “Enable a supported WPA-Personal security mode and configure a protected passphrase.”, verified by “The WLAN security details show actual authentication and encryption instead of merely a hidden name.”.
D:That action addresses a different network issue: A vital help-desk application is inaccessible after a power failure but its data is secret and unaltered; an analyst says the CIA triad shows no issue. The present fictional Westport Transit Depot finding instead needs “Enable a supported WPA-Personal security mode and configure a protected passphrase.”, verified by “The WLAN security details show actual authentication and encryption instead of merely a hidden name.”.
Question 990
An incident reviewer analyzes this observation: At the fictional Westport Transit Depot during basic configuration verification, the team observes: A parent turns off SSID broadcast and calls the Wi-Fi network fully encrypted even though the router security mode is open. What is the MOST specific underlying cause?
- Hiding the SSID does not replace WPA2 or WPA3 encryption and authentication.
- IPv4 and IPv6 traffic may require corresponding security controls for their distinct address families.
- A vulnerability is an exploitable weakness; ransomware is a malware threat that abuses weaknesses or user actions to disrupt data availability and integrity.
- Authentication can verify an identity in a directory such as Active Directory, while authorization separately decides the user's permitted resources.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:Correct. This mechanism fits the observed network symptom at the fictional Westport Transit Depot: Hiding the SSID does not replace WPA2 or WPA3 encryption and authentication. The corresponding remedy is “Enable a supported WPA-Personal security mode and configure a protected passphrase.”. Confirmation: The WLAN security details show actual authentication and encryption instead of merely a hidden name.
Incorrect Answers
B:That cause belongs to a different case: An office applies IPv4 firewall rules and assumes they automatically protect an enabled IPv6 interface with a separate policy stack. The observed fictional Westport Transit Depot condition is specifically explained by “Hiding the SSID does not replace WPA2 or WPA3 encryption and authentication.”.
C:That cause belongs to a different case: An unpatched workstation runs an untrusted downloaded attachment that exploits a known vulnerability, encrypts user documents and demands payment. The observed fictional Westport Transit Depot condition is specifically explained by “Hiding the SSID does not replace WPA2 or WPA3 encryption and authentication.”.
D:That cause belongs to a different case: A corporate Wi-Fi admin verifies a user's password against Active Directory but the authorization policy still denies a restricted VLAN; the team calls the two steps identical. The observed fictional Westport Transit Depot condition is specifically explained by “Hiding the SSID does not replace WPA2 or WPA3 encryption and authentication.”.