Visit here for our full Amazon AWS Certified DevOps Engineer – Professional DOP-C02 exam dumps and practice test questions.
Question 181
A DevOps team manages a containerized application running on Amazon ECS with Fargate. They notice intermittent latency spikes due to variable workloads. The application is designed to scale based on CPU utilization, but the current scaling strategy is insufficient for burst traffic patterns. Which approach ensures optimal performance and cost-efficiency under unpredictable traffic?
A) Increase ECS task count statically and manually adjust based on expected traffic.
B) Use ECS Service Auto Scaling with target tracking policies for CPU and memory utilization.
C) Switch to EC2-backed ECS clusters and schedule scaling based on cron jobs.
D) Deploy all tasks in a single Availability Zone to reduce network overhead.
Answer: B
Explanation:
The most effective solution for managing variable workloads with minimal latency and optimal cost-efficiency is to implement ECS Service Auto Scaling with target tracking policies for both CPU and memory utilization. Target tracking policies automatically adjust the desired number of tasks in an ECS service to maintain predefined utilization thresholds. This ensures the application scales dynamically in response to traffic spikes or decreases without manual intervention, improving both performance and operational efficiency.
Option A, statically increasing ECS tasks and manually adjusting based on expected traffic, is operationally intensive and prone to errors. Predicting traffic patterns accurately is difficult, and this method cannot respond to unexpected spikes, leading to potential latency or downtime. Option C, using EC2-backed ECS clusters with cron-based scaling, adds unnecessary complexity and infrastructure management overhead, as Fargate provides a serverless approach that abstracts server provisioning. Cron-based scaling is also not responsive to real-time traffic changes. Option D, deploying all tasks in a single Availability Zone, increases the risk of service degradation during AZ-level outages and does not address scaling needs for burst traffic.
By leveraging ECS Service Auto Scaling, target tracking policies allow the system to maintain CPU or memory utilization at the desired levels, ensuring predictable performance without over-provisioning resources. This approach is cost-efficient, as Fargate billing is based on vCPU and memory usage per task, and tasks scale up only when required. The strategy also provides high availability since ECS tasks can be distributed across multiple Availability Zones, mitigating the risk of downtime.
Additionally, integrating CloudWatch metrics and alarms provides observability into scaling events, resource utilization, and performance bottlenecks. Monitoring allows DevOps engineers to fine-tune scaling policies over time, optimizing thresholds to balance cost and performance. With this setup, the system can automatically handle burst traffic patterns, reduce latency, maintain operational efficiency, and ensure a resilient, scalable architecture suitable for mission-critical workloads. This method aligns with AWS best practices for containerized applications running on Fargate.
Question 182
A company deploys a highly transactional e-commerce application using AWS Lambda, API Gateway, and DynamoDB. Occasionally, Lambda functions fail when processing batch records due to exceeding the DynamoDB write throughput. The team wants to ensure all records are processed successfully without throttling errors. Which solution achieves this goal effectively?
A) Increase Lambda memory and timeout values.
B) Use DynamoDB on-demand capacity with Lambda retry policies and implement exponential backoff.
C) Reduce the batch size of Lambda events and manually process failed records.
D) Switch to S3 as the primary data store to avoid throughput issues.
Answer: B
Explanation:
To ensure all records are processed successfully without throttling, the recommended approach is to use DynamoDB on-demand capacity, combined with Lambda retry policies and exponential backoff. On-demand mode allows DynamoDB to automatically handle traffic spikes, eliminating the risk of write throttling and providing consistent throughput for unpredictable workloads. Lambda retry policies, when combined with exponential backoff, help gracefully handle transient errors without manual intervention, ensuring that all records are eventually processed.
Option A, increasing Lambda memory and timeout values, may improve function performance but does not solve database throttling issues. If DynamoDB throttles requests due to exceeding provisioned throughput, the Lambda function will still fail regardless of memory or timeout. Option C, reducing batch size and manually processing failed records, introduces significant operational overhead and delays, making it less scalable for high-volume applications. Option D, switching to S3 as the primary datastore, is not suitable for transactional workloads requiring strong consistency, as S3 does not provide database-like transaction support or querying capabilities.
DynamoDB on-demand mode is ideal for workloads with unpredictable traffic patterns, automatically adjusting to traffic spikes and drops, reducing operational complexity. Lambda’s event source mapping supports retry mechanisms where failed records are retried multiple times based on a backoff strategy. For batch processing, implementing Dead Letter Queues (DLQs) ensures that any records that continue to fail after retries are isolated for inspection and remediation, preventing them from blocking the processing of other valid records.
Integrating CloudWatch metrics and alarms provides observability into throttled requests, function errors, and processing latency, enabling proactive management and fine-tuning of performance. This solution ensures high reliability, minimal latency, and operational efficiency, allowing DevOps teams to maintain scalable, fault-tolerant, and cost-effective serverless architectures. By combining on-demand throughput, retry logic, DLQs, and monitoring, organizations can confidently handle high-volume transactional workloads without performance degradation.
Question 183
A DevOps engineer is designing a CI/CD pipeline for a multi-account AWS environment. The organization requires centralized logging, secure artifact storage, and role-based access for deployments across multiple accounts. Which architecture meets these requirements efficiently?
A) Store artifacts in S3 within each account and use IAM users for access.
B) Use CodePipeline in a central account, with cross-account IAM roles for artifact deployment and centralized logging in CloudWatch Logs or S3.
C) Deploy pipelines separately in each account without centralized management.
D) Use Lambda to copy artifacts manually between accounts and log events via SNS notifications.
Answer: B
Explanation:
The most effective architecture for a centralized, multi-account CI/CD pipeline is to use CodePipeline in a central account, coupled with cross-account IAM roles for deployment and centralized logging in CloudWatch Logs or S3. This approach allows a single pipeline to orchestrate builds and deployments across multiple AWS accounts, ensuring consistent security, visibility, and operational control.
Option A, storing artifacts in S3 within each account and using IAM users, results in fragmented access control, duplication of resources, and inconsistent security policies. Managing multiple IAM users across accounts is prone to errors and lacks scalability. Option C, deploying pipelines separately in each account, increases maintenance overhead and operational complexity while making centralized monitoring difficult. Option D, using Lambda to copy artifacts manually, is error-prone, introduces latency, and does not provide a reliable, auditable CI/CD process.
Using CodePipeline with cross-account IAM roles allows pipelines to deploy artifacts securely across accounts without exposing long-lived credentials. Roles with appropriate permissions are assumed dynamically during pipeline execution, adhering to the principle of least privilege. Centralized logging ensures that all pipeline events, deployment outcomes, and errors are collected in a single location, facilitating monitoring, auditing, and compliance. CloudWatch Logs or S3 can store detailed records of deployment activities, enabling operational teams to analyze failures and optimize the deployment process.
Additionally, integrating CodeBuild for artifact creation and CodeDeploy or CloudFormation for automated deployments ensures consistent infrastructure provisioning and application deployment. Monitoring metrics and alarms in CloudWatch can trigger notifications or automated remediation in case of pipeline failures. This architecture provides secure, scalable, and auditable deployment pipelines, aligning with AWS best practices for multi-account governance, operational visibility, and compliance requirements. By centralizing pipeline orchestration, artifact storage, and logging, organizations achieve high operational efficiency and security while maintaining agility across multiple AWS accounts.
Question 184
A DevOps engineer is implementing serverless event-driven architecture using S3, Lambda, and SNS. The application requires guaranteed message delivery, ordered processing of events, and retries for failures. Which design pattern satisfies these requirements?
A) Use direct S3 event triggers to Lambda and rely on CloudWatch for monitoring.
B) Integrate S3 events with SNS FIFO topics, trigger Lambda functions, and enable DLQs for failed invocations.
C) Use S3 events to trigger Lambda synchronously without retries or queuing.
D) Batch S3 events manually and process them via EC2 instances.
Answer: B
Explanation:
The optimal solution to achieve guaranteed delivery, ordered processing, and retries is to integrate S3 events with SNS FIFO topics, trigger Lambda functions, and enable Dead Letter Queues (DLQs) for failed invocations. FIFO topics ensure exactly-once message delivery and maintain the order of events, which is essential for applications that require sequential processing. Lambda retries and DLQs provide fault-tolerant handling of errors, ensuring no events are lost.
Option A, using direct S3 triggers to Lambda, does not guarantee message ordering and only provides basic retry attempts, which may result in out-of-order or dropped events. Option C, triggering Lambda synchronously without retries or queuing, is prone to message loss if a function fails. Option D, batching events manually with EC2 instances, adds operational complexity, increases latency, and is not serverless, which negates the benefits of using Lambda and SNS.
Using SNS FIFO topics allows S3-generated events to be delivered in order to Lambda subscribers while maintaining deduplication and sequencing. DLQs capture any events that cannot be processed after retries, allowing DevOps teams to inspect and reprocess them, ensuring data integrity. Combined with CloudWatch metrics, teams can monitor invocation errors, processing latency, and queue length, enabling proactive troubleshooting and scaling.
This design pattern aligns with AWS serverless best practices, providing a highly resilient, scalable, and maintainable architecture. It ensures that events are reliably delivered, processed in sequence, and handled gracefully in case of failures, all without requiring manual intervention. By leveraging FIFO topics, Lambda retries, and DLQs, organizations can build robust event-driven pipelines suitable for applications that depend on precise and consistent event handling, reducing operational risk and improving overall reliability.
Question 185
A DevOps team is managing an application with sensitive customer data in Amazon S3 and RDS. Regulatory compliance mandates end-to-end encryption, access logging, and strict least privilege policies. Which combination of AWS services and configurations provides the most secure architecture?
A) Enable server-side encryption with S3-managed keys (SSE-S3), default RDS encryption, and rely on IAM user permissions.
B) Use KMS-managed encryption keys (SSE-KMS) for S3 and RDS, enable CloudTrail logging, configure IAM roles with least privilege, and enforce S3 bucket policies with encryption checks.
C) Encrypt data manually before storing in S3, use plaintext RDS, and monitor access weekly.
D) Disable encryption but use strong passwords and network security groups for protection.
Answer: B
Explanation:
The most secure and compliant solution for sensitive customer data is to use KMS-managed encryption keys (SSE-KMS) for both S3 and RDS, enable CloudTrail logging for all API activity, configure IAM roles with least privilege, and enforce S3 bucket policies that require encryption checks. SSE-KMS allows fine-grained control over encryption keys, including key rotation, access policies, and auditability. CloudTrail ensures all actions on S3 and RDS resources are logged and monitored for compliance audits. IAM roles with least privilege reduce the risk of unauthorized access, and bucket policies enforce mandatory encryption for stored objects.
Option A, using SSE-S3 and default RDS encryption, provides basic encryption but lacks fine-grained control and auditing capabilities for key usage, which may not meet strict regulatory standards. Option C, manually encrypting data with plaintext RDS, is operationally error-prone, increases complexity, and does not provide automated compliance enforcement. Option D, disabling encryption, exposes sensitive data to high risk and violates regulatory mandates.
By combining SSE-KMS, CloudTrail, IAM roles, and bucket policies, the architecture achieves end-to-end encryption, operational auditing, and secure access control. Additional controls, such as AWS Config rules to enforce compliance and VPC endpoints to restrict S3 access to private networks, can further enhance security. This approach ensures data remains encrypted in transit and at rest, all activities are auditable, and access is tightly controlled according to the principle of least privilege.
For organizations managing regulated workloads, this design provides high operational security, compliance readiness, and risk mitigation, while maintaining scalability and usability for DevOps teams. It aligns with AWS Well-Architected Framework security best practices, enabling secure, resilient, and compliant cloud deployments that protect sensitive customer information while supporting efficient application operation.
Question 186
A DevOps engineer is designing an Amazon ECS service running on Fargate that handles unpredictable bursts of traffic. The team wants to ensure low latency, cost efficiency, and high availability. Which configuration is the best approach?
A) Use a static number of ECS tasks and increase manually during traffic peaks.
B) Configure ECS Service Auto Scaling with target tracking on CPU and memory, distributed across multiple Availability Zones.
C) Run all tasks in a single Availability Zone to reduce cross-AZ network latency.
D) Switch to EC2-backed ECS clusters and schedule scaling with cron jobs.
Answer: B
Explanation:
The best approach to manage variable workloads while maintaining low latency, high availability, and cost efficiency is to use ECS Service Auto Scaling with target tracking policies for both CPU and memory utilization and distribute tasks across multiple Availability Zones. Target tracking automatically adjusts the number of running tasks to maintain resource utilization at a predefined threshold. This allows the service to scale out during traffic bursts and scale in when demand decreases, ensuring efficient use of resources and cost optimization.
Option A is not optimal because static task counts cannot respond dynamically to unpredictable bursts, leading to potential latency or service failure during spikes and wasted resources during low traffic periods. Option C, running all tasks in a single Availability Zone, introduces a single point of failure. An AZ outage would bring down the service, making it unsuitable for production environments requiring high availability. Option D, switching to EC2-backed clusters and using cron-based scaling, increases operational complexity, as EC2 instances must be managed, patched, and monitored. Cron-based scaling is also not responsive to sudden traffic spikes and may not provision enough capacity in time.
By combining ECS Service Auto Scaling, Fargate’s serverless compute model, and multi-AZ deployment, the system can automatically handle bursts, maintain low latency, and optimize costs. Observability is enhanced through CloudWatch metrics and alarms, which allow DevOps engineers to monitor CPU/memory utilization, task counts, and scaling activities. This combination adheres to AWS best practices for resilient, scalable, and cost-effective containerized applications, ensuring reliable performance even under highly variable traffic.
Question 187
An organization is using AWS Lambda and DynamoDB to process incoming batch events. Occasionally, Lambda functions fail because DynamoDB write throughput is exceeded. The DevOps team wants reliable processing of all records without throttling errors. Which solution best addresses this problem?
A) Increase Lambda memory and timeout values.
B) Use DynamoDB on-demand capacity, Lambda retry policies, and exponential backoff for errors.
C) Reduce Lambda batch sizes and manually process failed items.
D) Switch from DynamoDB to S3 to avoid throughput limits.
Answer: B
Explanation:
The most reliable solution for ensuring all records are processed without throttling is to use DynamoDB on-demand capacity combined with Lambda retry policies and exponential backoff. DynamoDB on-demand automatically adjusts read/write capacity to match traffic, eliminating write throttling errors even during spikes. Lambda retries and exponential backoff ensure that transient failures are automatically retried without losing records, maintaining data integrity.
Option A, increasing Lambda memory and timeout, may improve function execution but does not prevent database throttling. If DynamoDB cannot handle the request volume, Lambda will still fail. Option C, reducing batch size and manually processing failures, introduces significant operational complexity and delays, reducing reliability. Option D, switching to S3, is unsuitable for transactional workloads that require structured queries, strong consistency, or atomic operations.
Using on-demand capacity also reduces operational overhead by removing the need to manage provisioned throughput manually. Coupled with DLQs (Dead Letter Queues), any events that fail after multiple retries are isolated for inspection, ensuring no data is lost. Monitoring with CloudWatch metrics and alarms provides insight into throttling events and Lambda errors, allowing DevOps engineers to tune batch sizes, backoff intervals, and retry strategies. This design achieves high availability, scalability, and fault-tolerance in a serverless environment while ensuring reliable, cost-efficient processing of all events.
Question 188
A DevOps engineer needs to implement a CI/CD pipeline across multiple AWS accounts. The pipeline must provide centralized logging, secure artifact storage, and role-based deployment access. Which architecture fulfills these requirements efficiently?
A) Store artifacts in S3 within each account and manage IAM users manually.
B) Use CodePipeline in a central account, cross-account IAM roles for deployments, and centralized logging in CloudWatch or S3.
C) Deploy pipelines separately in each account without central orchestration.
D) Use Lambda functions to manually copy artifacts between accounts and log via SNS.
Answer: B
Explanation:
The most efficient solution for multi-account CI/CD is to use CodePipeline in a central account, with cross-account IAM roles for deployments and centralized logging in CloudWatch Logs or S3. This architecture provides consistent security, auditing, and operational control across multiple accounts while reducing operational complexity.
Option A, managing artifacts in individual S3 buckets with IAM users, fragments security and increases operational overhead. Manually handling users across accounts is error-prone and does not scale. Option C, deploying pipelines independently in each account, creates silos, reduces visibility, and complicates monitoring and compliance. Option D, manually copying artifacts with Lambda and logging via SNS, introduces latency, risk, and operational overhead.
Using cross-account roles, CodePipeline can assume temporary credentials to deploy artifacts securely across accounts without exposing long-term credentials. Centralized logging ensures that all pipeline actions, successes, and failures are auditable for compliance and troubleshooting. Integrating CodeBuild for artifact creation and CodeDeploy/CloudFormation for deployment ensures consistent and automated provisioning. CloudWatch metrics and alarms enable proactive monitoring of pipeline health. This setup is secure, scalable, and compliant, allowing DevOps teams to manage multi-account deployments efficiently while maintaining visibility and operational governance.
Question 189
A DevOps team is designing a serverless event-driven system with S3, Lambda, and SNS. The application requires guaranteed delivery, ordered event processing, and retries for failures. Which design pattern achieves these requirements?
A) Directly trigger Lambda from S3 and rely on CloudWatch for monitoring.
B) Integrate S3 events with SNS FIFO topics, trigger Lambda, and enable DLQs for failed events.
C) Use synchronous Lambda triggers from S3 without retries or queuing.
D) Batch S3 events manually and process them via EC2.
Answer: B
Explanation:
To achieve guaranteed delivery, ordered processing, and reliable retries, the recommended pattern is to integrate S3 events with SNS FIFO topics, trigger Lambda functions, and use Dead Letter Queues (DLQs) for failed events. FIFO topics provide exactly-once delivery and maintain the order of events, essential for applications that require sequential processing. DLQs capture any events that fail after multiple retries, ensuring that no data is lost.
Option A, direct Lambda triggers from S3, does not guarantee ordering and only provides limited retries, risking dropped or out-of-order events. Option C, synchronous Lambda triggers without queuing, is prone to failures and does not provide retry management. Option D, manual batching and EC2 processing, adds unnecessary operational overhead, increases latency, and is not serverless.
Using SNS FIFO topics ensures messages are processed in order with deduplication, while Lambda retries combined with DLQs provide fault tolerance. Monitoring via CloudWatch metrics and alarms allows proactive management of failures and scaling requirements. This serverless design is resilient, highly available, and scalable, providing robust handling of events while adhering to AWS best practices for event-driven architectures. It allows DevOps teams to maintain reliable, predictable, and fault-tolerant pipelines without complex operational overhead.
Question 190
A DevOps team manages an application storing sensitive customer data in Amazon S3 and RDS. Compliance requires end-to-end encryption, access logging, and strict least privilege policies. Which configuration best ensures security and regulatory compliance?
A) Enable SSE-S3 for S3, default RDS encryption, and rely on IAM users.
B) Use KMS-managed encryption keys (SSE-KMS) for S3 and RDS, enable CloudTrail, configure IAM roles with least privilege, and enforce S3 bucket policies requiring encryption.
C) Encrypt data manually for S3, use plaintext RDS, and review access weekly.
D) Disable encryption but enforce strong passwords and network security groups.
Answer: B
Explanation:
The most secure approach for sensitive data is to use SSE-KMS encryption for both S3 and RDS, enable CloudTrail logging, configure IAM roles with least privilege, and enforce S3 bucket policies requiring encryption. SSE-KMS allows fine-grained control of encryption keys, including access policies, rotation, and auditability. CloudTrail ensures that all API activity is recorded for compliance audits. IAM roles with least privilege reduce the risk of unauthorized access. S3 bucket policies ensure that only encrypted objects are stored.
Option A, using SSE-S3 and default RDS encryption, provides basic encryption but lacks detailed control over keys, auditing, and regulatory compliance enforcement. Option C, manually encrypting data, is error-prone and operationally complex, while plaintext RDS violates compliance requirements. Option D, disabling encryption, exposes sensitive data and violates regulations.
By combining SSE-KMS, CloudTrail, IAM least privilege, and bucket policies, the architecture provides end-to-end encryption, operational auditability, and secure access control. Additional enhancements like AWS Config rules and VPC endpoints for S3 improve compliance, ensuring that sensitive data remains encrypted in transit and at rest. This design is secure, scalable, and compliant, aligning with AWS Well-Architected Framework security best practices. It allows DevOps teams to maintain a robust and auditable environment while ensuring regulatory compliance and operational efficiency.
Question 191
A company is deploying a microservices application on AWS using Amazon ECS with Fargate. They want to implement a CI/CD pipeline that automatically deploys new container images to ECS after code changes are pushed to a Git repository. Which AWS service combination would provide a fully managed and automated solution for this requirement?
A) AWS CodeCommit, AWS CodeBuild, AWS CodePipeline, Amazon ECS
B) AWS CloudFormation, AWS Lambda, Amazon S3, Amazon ECS
C) Amazon S3, AWS Step Functions, Amazon ECS, AWS CloudTrail
D) Amazon EC2, AWS CodeDeploy, AWS Elastic Beanstalk, Amazon ECS
Answer: A
Explanation:
The requirement specifies a CI/CD pipeline that automatically deploys new container images to Amazon ECS after code changes in a Git repository. The combination of AWS CodeCommit, AWS CodeBuild, AWS CodePipeline, and Amazon ECS is the most suitable because these services are fully managed and designed for DevOps automation. AWS CodeCommit acts as a source code repository, allowing developers to push code securely. Once the code is committed, AWS CodeBuild compiles and builds the Docker images, executing automated tests if configured. After the build phase, AWS CodePipeline orchestrates the deployment workflow, ensuring new container images are automatically deployed to Amazon ECS with Fargate. This combination reduces the need for managing servers or CI/CD infrastructure manually.
Option B), involving AWS CloudFormation, Lambda, and S3, does not provide a streamlined pipeline for building and deploying containerized applications. While CloudFormation can provision resources and Lambda can trigger tasks, this setup requires significant custom scripting to achieve automation, making it less efficient. Option C) uses S3 and Step Functions, which are better suited for serverless workflows, not container deployment pipelines. Option D) mixes services like EC2 and Elastic Beanstalk, which are viable for deployments but lack a fully integrated CI/CD workflow with automated container builds and ECS deployment.
Using CodeCommit, CodeBuild, and CodePipeline together ensures end-to-end automation, scalability, and a reliable DevOps workflow, aligning with AWS best practices for continuous integration and continuous delivery. This approach also allows versioning, rollback capabilities, and integration with other AWS security and monitoring services, ensuring operational resilience and compliance.
Question 192
Your DevOps team is managing an application running on multiple AWS regions. They want to implement a centralized logging solution to collect, monitor, and analyze logs from Amazon EC2, Amazon ECS, and AWS Lambda. Which solution provides the most scalable and efficient architecture?
A) Amazon CloudWatch Logs, Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose, Amazon S3, Amazon OpenSearch Service
B) AWS CloudTrail, AWS Config, Amazon S3, Amazon QuickSight
C) Amazon S3, AWS Glue, Amazon Athena, Amazon Redshift
D) Amazon RDS, Amazon CloudWatch Metrics, AWS Lambda, Amazon SNS
Answer: A
Explanation:
Centralized logging in a multi-region, multi-service environment requires a scalable architecture capable of collecting and analyzing logs from diverse sources such as Amazon EC2, Amazon ECS, and AWS Lambda. The combination of Amazon CloudWatch Logs, Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose, Amazon S3, and Amazon OpenSearch Service offers a robust solution. CloudWatch Logs collects log data from applications and AWS services, providing near real-time monitoring. Kinesis Data Firehose streams these logs to a centralized storage like Amazon S3, which offers cost-effective, durable, and scalable storage across regions. Amazon OpenSearch Service then indexes the logs, enabling full-text search, analytics, and visualization.
Option B) focuses more on auditing and compliance rather than operational log analytics. AWS CloudTrail and AWS Config primarily track changes and API activity, which is useful for security auditing but insufficient for real-time log aggregation. Option C) leverages S3, Glue, Athena, and Redshift, which can analyze logs but involves batch processing rather than real-time monitoring, making it less suitable for operational troubleshooting. Option D) uses RDS and CloudWatch Metrics, which are not designed for large-scale log ingestion and analysis across multiple services and regions.
By adopting the CloudWatch Logs → Kinesis Firehose → S3 → OpenSearch approach, DevOps teams can build a highly available and scalable log pipeline that supports alerting, dashboards, and advanced analytics. This architecture allows seamless integration with third-party monitoring tools, custom visualizations, and automated anomaly detection, ensuring operational excellence and compliance in distributed cloud environments.
Question 193
A DevOps engineer is configuring an automated deployment strategy for an application hosted on AWS Elastic Beanstalk. The engineer wants to ensure zero downtime during deployments while maintaining the ability to roll back quickly in case of errors. Which deployment method should they use?
A) All at Once Deployment
B) Rolling Deployment
C) Rolling with Additional Batch Deployment
D) Blue/Green Deployment
Answer: D
Explanation:
The key requirements are zero downtime and quick rollback capability. Blue/Green Deployment is the most appropriate choice for AWS Elastic Beanstalk. In this approach, a parallel environment (green) is created alongside the currently running environment (blue). The new application version is deployed to the green environment while the blue environment continues serving production traffic. After testing the new version in the green environment, traffic is shifted from blue to green, usually via a DNS swap or Elastic Load Balancer update. If an issue arises, traffic can quickly revert to the blue environment, enabling fast rollback without affecting users.
Option A), All at Once Deployment, deploys new application versions to all instances simultaneously, causing downtime and higher risk. Option B), Rolling Deployment, deploys in batches but may still impact users, as some instances will run the new version while others run the old version, leading to inconsistent behavior. Option C), Rolling with Additional Batch Deployment, improves the standard rolling deployment by launching extra instances to maintain capacity, but it still doesn’t offer the immediate rollback advantage of blue/green deployment.
By leveraging blue/green deployment in Elastic Beanstalk, DevOps engineers can reduce deployment risks, ensure high availability, and achieve near-zero downtime for critical production applications. This strategy also integrates with monitoring and automated rollback mechanisms, enhancing overall operational resilience and ensuring customer experience continuity.
Question 194
Your organization wants to implement a secure DevOps pipeline on AWS for a containerized application. The requirement is to scan Docker images for vulnerabilities before deployment and ensure only approved images are deployed to production. Which AWS service combination would best satisfy these security requirements?
A) Amazon ECR Image Scanning, AWS CodeBuild, AWS CodePipeline, Amazon ECS
B) Amazon Inspector, AWS Lambda, AWS CloudTrail, Amazon S3
C) AWS Config, Amazon GuardDuty, AWS CodeDeploy, Amazon EC2
D) AWS Security Hub, Amazon Athena, AWS CloudFormation, Amazon ECS
Answer: A
Explanation:
Security in a DevOps pipeline is critical, especially for containerized workloads. Amazon ECR offers built-in image scanning capabilities using Amazon Inspector to identify vulnerabilities in Docker images. Integrating ECR image scanning with AWS CodeBuild and AWS CodePipeline ensures that only images that pass security checks are promoted to production. Amazon ECS then deploys the verified images in a fully managed container environment. This combination allows automation of security gates in the CI/CD pipeline, preventing insecure or unapproved images from reaching production environments.
Option B) involves Amazon Inspector and Lambda, but it lacks a fully integrated CI/CD workflow and automated deployment controls. Option C) focuses on auditing and threat detection (Config and GuardDuty) but does not automate vulnerability scanning or enforcement in the deployment pipeline. Option D) uses Security Hub and Athena, which are useful for compliance and reporting but do not provide an automated security check in the CI/CD process.
By implementing ECR Image Scanning → CodeBuild → CodePipeline → ECS, organizations can establish a robust, automated, and secure DevOps pipeline. This approach enforces security compliance, reduces operational risk, and integrates seamlessly with AWS monitoring and auditing services, ensuring a strong security posture for containerized applications.
Question 195
A company is using AWS CloudFormation to manage its infrastructure as code. The DevOps team wants to reduce the risk of accidental resource deletion and ensure that critical resources are retained even if a stack is deleted. Which CloudFormation feature should they use?
A) Stack Policies
B) Deletion Policy
C) Change Sets
D) Drift Detection
Answer: B
Explanation:
When using AWS CloudFormation, protecting critical resources from accidental deletion requires leveraging Deletion Policies. A Deletion Policy can be applied to individual resources within a stack, instructing CloudFormation to retain, snapshot, or delete the resource when the stack itself is deleted. The Retain policy is particularly useful for critical resources like RDS databases, S3 buckets, or DynamoDB tables, ensuring that important data and infrastructure persist even if the stack is removed. This mitigates accidental data loss and ensures continuity of critical services.
Option A), Stack Policies, restrict updates to certain resources during stack updates but do not prevent deletion. Option C), Change Sets, allow the team to preview changes before applying them but do not enforce resource retention during stack deletion. Option D), Drift Detection, identifies discrepancies between the stack template and deployed resources, helping detect configuration drift but not preventing resource deletion.
Using Deletion Policies enables DevOps teams to maintain robust, secure, and highly available cloud infrastructure while leveraging CloudFormation for infrastructure as code. It ensures business continuity and data integrity by preserving vital resources even in accidental or intentional stack deletion scenarios. Combining deletion policies with proper monitoring, auditing, and backup strategies further strengthens the operational resilience of AWS environments.
Question 196
A company is running a highly available web application on Amazon EC2 instances across multiple Availability Zones behind an Application Load Balancer. They want to implement automated scaling based on CPU utilization and request count to ensure optimal performance and cost efficiency. Which combination of AWS services and features should they implement to achieve this goal?
A) Amazon CloudWatch Alarms, Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling, Application Load Balancer target tracking
B) AWS Lambda, Amazon S3 Event Notifications, Amazon CloudFront
C) Amazon CloudTrail, AWS Config, AWS Systems Manager Automation
D) AWS Elastic Beanstalk, Amazon RDS Multi-AZ, AWS CloudFormation
Answer: A
Explanation:
To implement automated scaling for a highly available web application on Amazon EC2 instances, the correct approach involves Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling, CloudWatch Alarms, and Application Load Balancer (ALB) target tracking. EC2 Auto Scaling ensures that the right number of EC2 instances are running based on demand, maintaining availability while optimizing costs. Auto Scaling can scale out when demand spikes and scale in when demand decreases, eliminating manual intervention. CloudWatch Alarms monitor metrics such as CPU utilization, request count per target, or network I/O, triggering Auto Scaling policies when thresholds are breached. The ALB target tracking feature can directly integrate with Auto Scaling, allowing dynamic adjustment of instance count based on request load to maintain consistent performance.
Option B) involves Lambda, S3 Event Notifications, and CloudFront, which are primarily serverless and CDN-focused services. While they can support event-driven architecture and content delivery, they do not provide dynamic scaling for EC2-based applications. Option C) uses CloudTrail, AWS Config, and Systems Manager Automation, which are excellent for auditing, compliance, and automated operational workflows but do not provide real-time scaling capabilities. Option D) leverages Elastic Beanstalk and CloudFormation, which manage deployment and provisioning but do not directly provide the fine-grained CPU or request-based scaling that Auto Scaling with CloudWatch metrics delivers.
By combining CloudWatch Alarms, EC2 Auto Scaling, and ALB target tracking, DevOps teams achieve a fully automated, self-adjusting environment that balances cost and performance while maintaining application availability. This setup supports multi-AZ deployments, enhances fault tolerance, and integrates seamlessly with existing monitoring, alerting, and operational strategies. It also provides a foundation for proactive scaling policies, predictive scaling, and automated rollback mechanisms, ensuring continuous delivery and operational excellence.
Question 197
A DevOps engineer needs to implement a solution that allows developers to manage infrastructure as code, supports safe testing of changes, and ensures rollback capabilities. The infrastructure includes VPCs, subnets, EC2 instances, RDS databases, and security groups. Which AWS service and feature combination is best suited for this requirement?
A) AWS CloudFormation with Change Sets and Stack Policies
B) AWS Elastic Beanstalk with Rolling Updates
C) AWS OpsWorks with Chef Recipes
D) AWS Lambda with Step Functions and S3
Answer: A
Explanation:
When the goal is infrastructure as code (IaC) with safe change testing and rollback capability, AWS CloudFormation with Change Sets and Stack Policies is the ideal solution. CloudFormation allows DevOps engineers to define the complete infrastructure, including VPCs, subnets, EC2 instances, RDS databases, and security groups, in declarative JSON or YAML templates. This ensures consistent provisioning across environments. Change Sets provide a mechanism to preview the impact of proposed changes before executing them, helping prevent unintended disruptions. Engineers can review resource modifications, additions, or deletions and approve or reject them, reducing risk during updates. Stack Policies offer an additional safety layer by protecting critical resources from accidental modification or deletion during stack updates.
Option B), Elastic Beanstalk, focuses on application deployment and platform management rather than fine-grained IaC control for complex multi-resource infrastructure. Option C), OpsWorks, uses Chef recipes for configuration management, but it does not provide the same level of declarative stack management, preview capabilities, or automated rollback as CloudFormation. Option D), Lambda with Step Functions and S3, is oriented toward serverless workflows and event-driven orchestration but does not provide a centralized, declarative infrastructure provisioning model.
By leveraging CloudFormation, Change Sets, and Stack Policies, DevOps engineers achieve safe, repeatable, and controlled infrastructure deployments. This combination ensures infrastructure consistency, allows for automated validation and rollback, and provides robust protection for mission-critical resources. Additionally, integrating CloudFormation with AWS CodePipeline can fully automate CI/CD pipelines for infrastructure changes, enabling continuous delivery while adhering to security and compliance standards. This approach also aligns with best practices for immutable infrastructure, version-controlled templates, and enterprise-grade operational governance.
Question 198
Your organization wants to ensure that all Docker images pushed to Amazon Elastic Container Registry (ECR) are automatically scanned for vulnerabilities. They also want to prevent deployment of images with high-severity findings to Amazon ECS. Which AWS service configuration achieves this requirement efficiently?
A) Amazon ECR image scanning on push with Amazon EventBridge and AWS CodeBuild integration
B) AWS Lambda triggered by S3 upload with Amazon Inspector scans
C) AWS Config rules monitoring EC2 instances for compliance
D) Amazon GuardDuty with automated remediation using Systems Manager
Answer: A
Explanation:
For automated security enforcement of containerized applications, the combination of Amazon ECR image scanning on push, Amazon EventBridge, and AWS CodeBuild integration provides a highly effective solution. ECR image scanning leverages Amazon Inspector under the hood to detect vulnerabilities, providing severity-level assessments for each container image. By configuring image scanning on push, any newly uploaded image is automatically scanned before it is considered for deployment. Amazon EventBridge can monitor scan completion events and trigger additional automated workflows, such as invoking AWS CodeBuild or AWS Lambda functions to enforce policies. For example, images with high-severity vulnerabilities can be flagged or blocked from being deployed to Amazon ECS, ensuring that only compliant images reach production.
Option B), using Lambda triggered by S3 upload, is not efficient for container images stored in ECR, as this approach introduces unnecessary complexity and delays in the CI/CD pipeline. Option C), AWS Config rules for EC2 compliance, monitors configuration compliance but does not provide vulnerability scanning for Docker images. Option D), GuardDuty with Systems Manager remediation, focuses on threat detection and response at the account and instance level rather than enforcing container image security in a CI/CD pipeline.
Implementing ECR image scanning on push combined with EventBridge and CodeBuild ensures a secure, automated DevOps workflow. This approach provides early detection of vulnerabilities, integrates seamlessly with CI/CD pipelines, and enforces organizational security standards. It reduces operational risk, aligns with best practices for DevSecOps, and supports continuous compliance monitoring. Additionally, this setup facilitates reporting and auditing of image security, enabling proactive mitigation of vulnerabilities and seamless integration with automated deployment pipelines.
Question 199
A company wants to improve the reliability of its CI/CD pipelines hosted on AWS. Currently, deployments fail intermittently due to temporary network glitches or ECS service errors. The DevOps team wants to ensure retries are automatically handled without manual intervention. Which AWS service or feature can provide the most reliable solution for retrying failed deployments?
A) AWS CodePipeline with built-in retry policies and AWS Step Functions
B) Amazon CloudWatch Alarms with SNS notifications
C) AWS Elastic Beanstalk health checks
D) AWS Config rules with automatic remediation
Answer: A
Explanation:
To improve reliability in CI/CD pipelines and handle transient failures automatically, AWS CodePipeline with built-in retry policies and AWS Step Functions is the most effective approach. CodePipeline orchestrates CI/CD stages and can be configured to retry specific stages, such as build or deployment, if temporary failures occur. Integrating Step Functions allows even more complex workflows to manage retries, conditional branching, and error handling. This ensures that temporary network issues, ECS service deployment errors, or other intermittent failures do not cause the pipeline to fail completely, reducing the need for manual intervention.
Option B), CloudWatch Alarms with SNS notifications, can alert engineers to failures but does not automatically retry deployments. Manual action is still required to resolve transient issues. Option C), Elastic Beanstalk health checks, provide monitoring of application availability but do not provide pipeline-level retries or workflow automation. Option D), Config rules with automatic remediation, enforces compliance but does not manage CI/CD retry logic.
Using CodePipeline with retry policies and Step Functions ensures higher reliability, maintains deployment continuity, and reduces operational overhead. It supports best practices in resilient CI/CD, automated error handling, and DevOps reliability engineering, helping organizations maintain consistent application delivery and operational excellence while minimizing downtime caused by transient errors.
Question 200
A company is deploying a serverless application using AWS Lambda and API Gateway. The application needs to handle sudden traffic spikes efficiently while maintaining minimal latency. The DevOps team also wants detailed observability into function performance and errors. Which AWS services and features combination should they implement?
A) AWS Lambda Provisioned Concurrency, Amazon CloudWatch Logs, Amazon X-Ray
B) AWS Auto Scaling Groups, Amazon CloudFront, Amazon S3
C) AWS Elastic Beanstalk, AWS CodeDeploy, Amazon RDS Multi-AZ
D) AWS Step Functions, AWS Config, Amazon SNS
Answer: A
Explanation:
For serverless applications with unpredictable traffic patterns, AWS Lambda Provisioned Concurrency is key to ensuring minimal cold start latency. Provisioned Concurrency pre-initializes Lambda instances so that functions are ready to handle incoming requests immediately. Pairing this with Amazon CloudWatch Logs allows DevOps engineers to capture detailed logs for debugging, monitoring execution duration, and tracking errors. Amazon X-Ray adds tracing capabilities, enabling end-to-end observability, pinpointing latency, performance bottlenecks, and dependencies across Lambda and API Gateway calls.
Option B), using Auto Scaling Groups, CloudFront, and S3, is tailored for traditional EC2-based architectures and static content delivery rather than serverless compute scaling. Option C), Elastic Beanstalk with CodeDeploy, is suited for application deployment on managed servers, not serverless functions. Option D), Step Functions, Config, and SNS, supports orchestration, compliance, and notifications but does not address cold start latency or detailed observability for Lambda functions.
By implementing Provisioned Concurrency, CloudWatch Logs, and X-Ray, DevOps teams achieve predictable performance under traffic spikes, comprehensive monitoring, and actionable insights for optimization. This combination ensures efficient scaling, operational transparency, and reliable user experience while maintaining serverless cost efficiency. It also supports proactive troubleshooting, automated alerting, and detailed performance analytics, aligning with AWS best practices for serverless DevOps operations.
