Decoding the GMAT Verbal Reasoning Section

The GMAT Verbal Reasoning section comprises 36 multiple-choice questions to be completed in 65 minutes. It assesses your ability to comprehend written material, evaluate arguments, and correct written material to conform to standard written English. The section is divided into three primary question types:

Reading Comprehension (RC): Evaluates your ability to understand, analyze, and apply information from written passages.
Critical Reasoning (CR): Assesses your ability to evaluate arguments, identify assumptions, and draw logical conclusions.
Sentence Correction (SC): Tests your knowledge of grammar and effective communication.

The Importance of the Verbal Section

A significant portion of the GMAT score is derived from the Verbal Reasoning section. Mastery in this area is crucial for achieving a competitive overall score, which is essential for admission into top-tier business schools. The skills tested in this section are not only vital for the exam but also for success in graduate business programs, where analytical reading, critical thinking, and clear communication are paramount.

Mastering Reading Comprehension

Reading Comprehension questions present passages that may range from one to several paragraphs in length. These passages often delve into topics related to business, economics, or social sciences. To excel in this section:

• Skim the Passage: Begin by quickly skimming the passage to get a general idea of the topic and structure.
• Identify the Main Idea: Focus on understanding the primary argument or point the author is making.
• Note Supporting Details: Pay attention to facts, examples, and evidence that support the main idea.
• Understand the Author’s Tone and Purpose: Recognize whether the author is presenting information, making an argument, or expressing an opinion.

Strategies for Answering Questions

• Refer Back to the Passage: Always base your answers on information provided in the passage.
• Eliminate Incorrect Answers: Narrow down your choices by eliminating wrong answers.
• Beware of Traps: Be cautious of answer choices that use extreme language or introduce information not supported by the passage.

Excelling in Critical Reasoning

Analyzing Arguments

Critical Reasoning questions present arguments that you must evaluate. These questions test your ability to:

• Identify Assumptions: Recognize underlying assumptions that support the argument.
• Evaluate Evidence: Assess the strength and relevance of evidence presented.
• Draw Logical Conclusions: Determine whether the conclusion logically follows from the premises.

Common Question Types

• Strengthen or Weaken the Argument: Identify information that would bolster or undermine the argument.
• Find the Assumption: Determine an unstated premise that the argument relies upon.
• Evaluate the Conclusion: Assess the validity of the conclusion based on the provided information.

Tips for Success

• Understand the Structure: Break down the argument into premises and conclusion to understand its structure.
• Practice Regularly: Engage with a variety of Critical Reasoning questions to familiarize yourself with different argument types.
• Think Critically: Approach each argument with a questioning mindset, considering alternative explanations and viewpoints.

Perfecting Sentence Correction

Understanding Grammar Rules

Sentence Correction questions assess your knowledge of standard written English. Key areas to focus on include:

• Subject-Verb Agreement: Ensure that subjects and verbs agree in number and person.
• Parallelism: Maintain consistent grammatical structures in lists and comparisons.
• Modifiers: Place modifiers next to the words they modify to avoid ambiguity.
• Pronoun Agreement: Ensure pronouns agree in number and gender with their antecedents.

Strategies for Answering Questions

• Read the Entire Sentence: Understand the context before making corrections.
• Identify Errors: Look for common errors such as missing commas, incorrect verb tenses, or awkward phrasing.
• Choose the Best Option: Select the answer that corrects the error without introducing new issues.

Practice Makes Perfect

Regular practice with Sentence Correction questions will help you become familiar with common error types and improve your ability to identify and correct them quickly.

Mastering the GMAT Verbal Reasoning section requires a strategic approach, consistent practice, and a deep understanding of the skills being tested. By focusing on Reading Comprehension, Critical Reasoning, and Sentence Correction, and employing effective strategies for each, you can enhance your performance and achieve a competitive score. Remember, the goal is not just to answer questions correctly but to develop the analytical and communication skills that will serve you well in your academic and professional endeavors.

Mastering Reading Comprehension for the GMAT

Reading Comprehension (RC) questions on the GMAT are often considered the most time-consuming yet rewarding section. These questions assess your ability to digest, analyze, and interpret information from written passages that cover a range of topics, including business, economics, science, and social issues. The goal is to test how well you can understand and apply the ideas presented in these passages, as well as your ability to draw logical conclusions from them.

Skimming the Passage: The First Step

Before diving deep into the passage, it’s essential to begin by skimming. This initial glance is not about absorbing every detail but rather about getting a general sense of the topic, structure, and tone. Skim the first few sentences of each paragraph to identify the main idea, as well as any major supporting points that will shape your understanding of the text.

• First, identify the central theme: Is the author making an argument, explaining a process, or simply describing an event?
• Second, note the tone: Does the author seem objective, biased, neutral, or passionate about the subject matter?

Once you’ve formed a basic understanding of the passage, it’s time to tackle the questions.

Identifying the Main Idea

A key component of Reading Comprehension success is identifying the central idea or thesis of the passage. This overarching point often appears in the introduction or conclusion, though it may be implied throughout. It’s essential to determine what the author is trying to communicate to avoid falling into the trap of focusing too much on secondary details.

To pinpoint the main idea:

• Look for summaries or conclusions: The author may restate the main point in the final sentences of a paragraph or at the end of the passage.
• Pay attention to shifts in focus: If the author shifts tone or perspective, it may indicate a deeper point or argument.
• Use keywords: Look for terms that are repeated or emphasized throughout the text—these often relate to the central idea.

Recognizing the Structure

Every passage has a structure, whether it’s a clear argument, a cause-and-effect relationship, or an analysis of multiple viewpoints. Understanding this structure helps you navigate through the passage efficiently.

• Cause and Effect: If the author discusses causes and their subsequent effects, look for the link between them.
• Comparison and Contrast: If the passage compares two ideas or viewpoints, focus on understanding both sides.
• Problem and Solution: Some passages may present a problem and then discuss possible solutions. Identifying this will help you understand the purpose of the text.

Understanding the structure allows you to anticipate the kinds of questions that might arise, such as identifying the author’s perspective or understanding the logic behind certain conclusions.

Effective Strategies for Answering Questions

Once you’ve absorbed the passage, it’s time to tackle the questions. The most effective strategy for Reading Comprehension is to base your answers directly on the passage. However, many candidates make the mistake of relying on their prior knowledge or assumptions about the topic. Always refer back to the text to ensure accuracy.

Don’t Rely on Memory

While it might be tempting to answer from memory or general knowledge, the GMAT tests your ability to read and analyze the passage at hand, not your knowledge of the world. All the information you need to answer the questions should be present in the passage, even if it’s indirectly stated.

Eliminate Incorrect Choices

Many RC questions feature distractors—answer choices that may seem plausible but are incorrect. Use the process of elimination to rule out answers that:

• Misrepresent the author’s tone or intent.
• Introduce new information not supported by the passage.
• Do not reflect the main idea or arguments presented.

Eliminating wrong answers is often easier than identifying the right one, so don’t hesitate to cross out choices you are certain are incorrect.

Read Carefully for Specifics

Some RC questions will focus on specific details or nuances from the passage. These questions often require you to refer back to the passage to find specific information, such as definitions, examples, or supporting evidence. Here, precision matters.

• Look for keywords in the question: Words like “according to the passage” or “the author suggests” point you back to specific details.
• Revisit the relevant passage section: If a question focuses on a particular paragraph or concept, go back to that part and reread it carefully.

Beware of Traps

GMAT RC questions often present answers that are designed to mislead you. These traps can take various forms, such as:

• Extreme language: Words like “always,” “never,” “only,” and “every” may seem definitive, but are often wrong.
• Ambiguous wording: Some choices may be grammatically correct, but don’t align with the passage’s meaning.
• Distracting detail: Some answers may introduce additional details that are irrelevant to the main point of the passage.

It’s crucial to stay alert and avoid being swayed by overly definitive or distracting options.

Strengthening Your Skills: Practice Makes Perfect

To truly master Reading Comprehension, consistent practice is key. Practice not only improves your reading speed but also enhances your ability to understand complex ideas quickly. Here’s how to hone your skills:

• Set a time limit: In a real GMAT setting, you’ll have limited time for each passage. Practice reading quickly but effectively within time constraints.
• Varied reading: Read a variety of materials—business articles, science journals, and literature. The more varied the content, the more adaptable your reading skills will become.
• Focus on accuracy: Speed is essential, but accuracy should never be sacrificed. Regularly review your incorrect answers and understand why they were wrong.
• Mastering Reading Comprehension on the GMAT requires more than just understanding the words in the passage; it requires the ability to extract meaning, analyze arguments, and think critically about the content. By focusing on skimming techniques, identifying the main idea, understanding passage structure, and using strategic question-answering methods, you can significantly enhance your performance in this section.

Remember, success in GMAT Reading Comprehension is about developing your analytical skills, cultivating your attention to detail, and practicing consistently to build your confidence and speed.

Excelling in GMAT Critical Reasoning

Critical Reasoning (CR) is an integral component of the GMAT Verbal Reasoning section. While it might not have the extensive reading passages found in Reading Comprehension, Critical Reasoning demands an even deeper level of intellectual engagement. The primary aim of CR questions is to assess your ability to evaluate and construct logical arguments, recognize assumptions, and analyze reasoning patterns. Strong performance in this section is a clear indication of your ability to think critically—a vital skill not only for the GMAT but also for your future business studies and professional life.

Critical Reasoning on the GMAT typically consists of 12 to 14 questions, each accompanied by a short passage or argument. You will be asked to evaluate the argument and answer questions related to it, such as identifying assumptions, strengthening or weakening the argument, or finding logical flaws.

Dissecting the Structure of an Argument

At the core of every CR question lies an argument, consisting of premises (evidence or facts) that lead to a conclusion. Your task is to evaluate whether the argument’s premises support the conclusion in a valid, logical way. Recognizing the components of the argument is crucial in tackling CR questions effectively.

Premises and Conclusion: Understanding the Basics

• Premises: These are the supporting facts, data, or evidence in the argument. The premises attempt to provide a foundation for the conclusion.
• Conclusion: The conclusion is the point the author is trying to make, based on the premises. It’s the statement that the premises aim to support.

In most cases, the conclusion will be more general, while the premises are more specific. A strong argument will logically connect the premises to the conclusion.

Key Question Types in Critical Reasoning

There are several different types of CR questions, and understanding the various formats will help you approach each one with the right strategy. The following are some common CR question types:

1. Strengthening and Weakening Arguments

These questions ask you to evaluate an argument and choose the answer choice that either strengthens or weakens the reasoning.

• Strengthen the Argument: Look for an answer that makes the argument more plausible by providing additional support for the conclusion. For instance, an answer that supports a premise or fills a gap in reasoning will usually strengthen the argument.
• Weaken the Argument: Choose the option that casts doubt on the argument or undermines one or more of the premises. A good weakening answer will challenge the logic of the argument, often by introducing new evidence or questioning the assumptions behind it.

2. Identifying Assumptions

Assumption questions ask you to recognize an unstated premise that must be true for the argument to hold. Often, these assumptions are crucial for the conclusion’s validity, but aren’t directly mentioned in the argument. Finding the correct assumption requires you to analyze the logic of the argument critically.

• Look for Gaps in Logic: Think about what would have to be true for the argument to make sense. What is left unspoken, but necessary for the conclusion to follow?
• Examine the Author’s Premises: What assumptions underlie the claims made in the premises? Often, the correct assumption will fill these gaps.

3. Evaluating the Conclusion

Evaluating the conclusion asks you to assess the logical validity of the conclusion based on the premises. Here, you may need to identify whether the conclusion logically follows from the information given or if the reasoning is flawed.

• Check for Logical Fallacies: Often, CR questions contain flawed arguments. Common logical fallacies include overgeneralizations, causal fallacies, and circular reasoning.
• Determine the Strength of the Link: Does the conclusion follow naturally from the premises, or is there a leap in reasoning? A strong conclusion should be directly supported by the premises.

Strategies for Success in Critical Reasoning

Critical Reasoning questions can be tricky, and it’s easy to get lost in the details. However, there are several key strategies you can employ to increase your accuracy and speed when tackling these questions.

1. Identify the Argument’s Structure

The first step in approaching any CR question is to break down the argument into its basic components: premises and conclusion. This clear understanding of the argument’s structure will allow you to evaluate its logic effectively.

• Premise Indicator Words: Look for words like “because,” “since,” or “for” that typically introduce premises.
• Conclusion Indicator Words: Words like “therefore,” “thus,” or “consequently” often signal the conclusion.

Understanding the structure helps you evaluate the validity of the reasoning presented.

2. Be Wary of Overly Strong Language

Many Critical Reasoning questions will offer answer choices that use extreme language—terms like “always,” “never,” “only,” or “must.” These answers are often incorrect because they introduce unnecessary absolutes. Unless the argument directly implies such extreme language, it’s best to eliminate those options.

3. Take Your Time with the First Read

Unlike other sections of the GMAT, Critical Reasoning questions benefit from a slower, more deliberate approach. Take your time during the initial read-through of the argument. Only once you fully comprehend the argument should you proceed to the answer choices. Rushed analysis can easily lead to overlooking crucial details.

4. Practice Logical Flaws

Understanding logical fallacies is a critical component of succeeding in Critical Reasoning. Some of the most common fallacies include:

• False Cause: Assuming that one event causes another without sufficient evidence.
• Circular Reasoning: The argument essentially restates the conclusion as a premise.
• Ad Hominem: Attacking the character of the person making the argument instead of addressing the argument itself.

Being familiar with these fallacies will help you recognize flawed reasoning and choose the best answer.

Enhancing Your Critical Reasoning Skills

Like all sections of the GMAT, success in Critical Reasoning comes with consistent practice. Here are a few tips to further enhance your skills:

• Regular Practice: Dedicate time each day to practice Critical Reasoning questions. Over time, you will recognize common patterns and become faster at identifying logical flaws and assumptions.
• Learn from Mistakes: After each practice session, review your incorrect answers thoroughly. Understanding why a particular answer is wrong can help you refine your reasoning process.
• Use a Structured Approach: Develop a systematic method for breaking down arguments, whether it’s identifying the conclusion first or labeling premises and assumptions. Having a consistent strategy will improve both your speed and accuracy.

Mastering Critical Reasoning on the GMAT requires a strong grasp of logical principles, careful analysis of arguments, and the ability to recognize both strengths and weaknesses in reasoning. By practicing consistently, learning to identify logical fallacies, and honing your ability to break down arguments systematically, you’ll not only excel in the GMAT but also develop valuable skills for your academic and professional career.

Remember that CR questions are designed to test your thinking process, so always approach them with a critical eye and a clear, logical mindset. With practice, you’ll be able to tackle even the most challenging Critical Reasoning questions with confidence and precision.

Mastering GMAT Sentence Correction

The Importance of Sentence Correction in GMAT Verbal Reasoning

Sentence Correction (SC) is one of the most pivotal sections of the GMAT Verbal Reasoning test, and mastering it can dramatically improve your overall score. The section consists of 12 to 15 questions, each featuring a sentence with one or more grammatical errors. Your task is to identify the best possible revision from the answer choices, ensuring that the sentence is grammatically correct, concise, and clear in meaning.

Given the complexity of the language tested on the GMAT, SC questions evaluate a variety of language concepts, including subject-verb agreement, modifiers, parallelism, idiomatic usage, and sentence structure. The goal is not only to identify what is wrong but also to choose the most precise and effective phrasing.

Breaking Down Sentence Correction Questions

Each Sentence Correction question contains a sentence with a potential error, and you are given five answer choices. Among these options, one choice is grammatically correct and stylistically superior, while the others contain errors ranging from minor issues to more significant faults in logic, structure, or meaning.

The questions assess your knowledge of English grammar, style, and writing mechanics, as well as your ability to recognize errors that affect the clarity, coherence, or tone of a sentence. These questions require not just grammatical expertise, but also the ability to understand the underlying meaning of the sentence and how best to express it.

Key Areas of Focus in Sentence Correction

Several important categories of grammatical and stylistic issues frequently appear in Sentence Correction questions:

1. Subject-Verb Agreement
2. Modifiers and Parallelism
3. Pronouns
4. Word Choice and Idioms
5. Sentence Structure
6. Conciseness and Redundancy
7. Logical Meaning

Understanding these areas will allow you to effectively tackle Sentence Correction questions and make the right choices.

Subject-Verb Agreement: Ensuring Consistency

One of the most fundamental rules tested in Sentence Correction is subject-verb agreement. In essence, a subject and its corresponding verb must agree in number. A singular subject takes a singular verb, while a plural subject takes a plural verb.

Common Mistakes in Subject-Verb Agreement

1. Compound Subjects: When subjects are joined by “and,” they are typically treated as plural, requiring a plural verb.
   • Correct: The cat and the dog are playing outside.
   • Incorrect: The cat and the dog are playing outside.
2. Subjects Joined by “or” or “nor”: When subjects are joined by “or” or “nor,” the verb agrees with the noun closest to it.
   • Correct: Either the teacher or the students have to be here early.
   • Incorrect: Either the students or the teacher has to be here early.
3. Collective Nouns: Collective nouns (such as team, family, or group) can take either singular or plural verbs, depending on whether the group is acting as a whole or as individuals.
   • Singular: The team is preparing for the match.
   • Plural: The team is debating how to divide their earnings.
4. Indefinite Pronouns: Some indefinite pronouns like “everyone,” “someone,” and “anyone” take singular verbs, while others like “few,” “several,” and “many” take plural verbs.
   • Correct: Everyone is here.
   • Incorrect: Everyone is here.

Modifiers and Parallelism: Enhancing Clarity and Balance

Modifiers add information to a sentence, and they must be placed correctly to avoid confusion. Parallelism, on the other hand, ensures that elements of a sentence maintain consistency in structure, form, or function.

Modifiers

Modifiers should be placed next to the word they modify to avoid ambiguity. Misplaced modifiers can create confusion by modifying the wrong word or phrase.

• Correct: The car parked on the street is mine.
• Incorrect: Parked on the street, the car is mine.

In the incorrect example, the placement of the modifier “parked on the street” makes it seem like the car is doing the parking, when in fact, it should be the car being parked.

Parallelism

Parallelism refers to the use of consistent structures in sentences, especially when listing items or comparing things. Ensuring parallel structure is crucial in making sentences clear and logical.

• Correct: She likes reading, writing, and traveling.
• Incorrect: She likes reading, writing, and traveling.

Notice how the verbs in the incorrect example are not in the same form. The verbs “reading,” “to write,” and “traveling” must all match in form (gerund in this case).

Pronouns: Clarifying Meaning

Pronouns replace nouns to avoid redundancy, but they must always agree with their antecedents in number, gender, and person. Additionally, the antecedent should be clear to prevent ambiguity.

Common Pronoun Errors

1. Pronoun Agreement: A pronoun must agree in number (singular/plural) and gender (male/female/neutral) with its antecedent.
   • Correct: The boy lost his keys.
   • Incorrect: The boy lost their keys. (Since “boy” is singular, the pronoun must be singular.)
2. Ambiguous Antecedents: Pronouns must refer to a specific noun.
   • Correct: Sarah went to the store, and she bought some fruit.
   • Incorrect: Sarah went to the store, and she bought fruits from it. (Unclear what “it” refers to)
3. Pronoun Case: In some sentences, the case of the pronoun (subjective, objective, possessive) must be correct.
   • Correct: He and I went to the store.
   • Incorrect: He and I went to the store.

Word Choice and Idioms: Precision in Language

The GMAT Sentence Correction questions frequently test idiomatic usage—phrases or expressions that are conventional in the language, even if they might not be logically transparent. Correct usage of idioms is critical in GMAT writing.

Common Idiomatic Errors

1. Wrong Prepositions: Some verbs require specific prepositions, and using the wrong one can result in a grammatically incorrect sentence.
   • Correct: She is good at solving puzzles.
   • Incorrect: She is good at solving puzzles.
2. Confusing “Between” and “Among”: “Between” is used for two items, and “among” for more than two.
   • Correct: The discussion was between the two leaders.
   • Incorrect: The discussion was among the two leaders.

Word Precision

Choose words that precisely convey the intended meaning. Using ambiguous or imprecise words can detract from the sentence’s clarity and effectiveness.

• Correct: The project was completed efficiently.
• Incorrect: The project was done well.

Sentence Structure: Maintaining Clarity and Coherence

The structure of your sentence determines how clearly and effectively your ideas are communicated. Overly complex or awkwardly structured sentences can confuse the reader and obscure the intended message.

Avoiding Run-On Sentences

Run-on sentences occur when two independent clauses are joined without appropriate punctuation or conjunctions.

• Correct: She was late, so she missed the meeting.
• Incorrect: She was late, and she missed the meeting.

Correct Use of Commas and Semicolons

Commas and semicolons are used to separate ideas within a sentence, but they must be applied correctly.

• Correct: I have a meeting tomorrow; I need to prepare.
• Incorrect: I have a meeting tomorrow, I need to prepare.

Conciseness and Redundancy: Striving for Brevity

In GMAT Sentence Correction, brevity is not just a stylistic choice—it’s a requirement. The test values conciseness because it makes your communication more efficient and effective. Redundant or unnecessarily wordy sentences are penalized.

Common Redundancy Errors

1. Repetitive Words: Words that mean the same thing should not be repeated.
   • Correct: She attended the meeting.
   • Incorrect: She attended the meeting for the reason that she had to.
2. Unnecessary Modifiers: Overuse of adjectives or adverbs can create overly complex and convoluted sentences.
   • Correct: He made a decision.
   • Incorrect: He made a final decision without thinking.

Logical Meaning: Ensuring Consistency in Thought

A critical aspect of GMAT Sentence Correction is ensuring that the sentence makes logical sense. The sentence should not only be grammatically correct, but it must also be coherent and logically consistent.

Common Logical Issues

1. Faulty Comparisons: Ensure that comparisons are logically sound and balanced.
   • Correct: She is taller than her brother.
   • Incorrect: She is taller than her brother is tall.
2. Faulty Cause and Effect: Make sure that causal relationships are logically supported by the premise.
   • Correct: The increase in sales was due to the marketing campaign.
   • Incorrect: The marketing campaign was due to the increase in sales.

Conclusion 

Mastering Sentence Correction requires not just a firm grasp of grammar rules but also a keen understanding of effective communication. By focusing on the rules of grammar, sentence structure, and meaning, and regularly practicing with GMAT-style questions, you can significantly improve your performance.

The key to success in Sentence Correction lies in recognizing common errors, applying the correct rules, and ultimately choosing the most concise and effective answer.

• < Mastering the TOEFL Reading Section: Strategies for Comprehension and Speed
• Mastering the SAT Writing and Essay Sections: Strategies for Success and Top Tips >