Visit here for our full Google Professional Data Engineer exam dumps and practice test questions.
Question 1
Your company is migrating a large dataset from an on-premises data warehouse to BigQuery. The dataset is 50 TB in size and needs to be transferred with minimal downtime. Network bandwidth between your data center and Google Cloud is limited. What is the most cost-effective and efficient method to transfer this data?
A) Use gsutil to upload the data directly to Cloud Storage, then load it into BigQuery
B) Use the BigQuery Data Transfer Service to pull data from the on-premises system
C) Use Transfer Appliance to ship the data physically to Google Cloud
D) Set up a VPN connection and stream the data using Cloud Dataflow
Answer: C
Explanation:
When dealing with large-scale data migrations, especially datasets in the multi-terabyte range, the choice of transfer method significantly impacts both cost and timeline. This question tests understanding of Google Cloud’s data transfer options and when to use each approach.
Transfer Appliance is Google Cloud’s physical data transfer solution designed specifically for large datasets where network transfer would be impractical. For a 50 TB dataset with limited network bandwidth, shipping the data physically is the most efficient approach. The appliance is a high-capacity storage device that Google ships to your data center, where you load your data onto it, then ship it back to Google for upload to Cloud Storage.
A) is incorrect because using gsutil over a limited bandwidth connection would take an extremely long time for 50 TB of data. Even with a 100 Mbps connection running continuously, this transfer could take weeks or months. Additionally, network costs and potential transfer interruptions make this approach impractical for such large volumes.
B) is incorrect because the BigQuery Data Transfer Service is designed for scheduled transfers from supported SaaS applications and data warehouses, not for initial bulk migrations of this size over limited bandwidth. It would face the same network constraints as option A.
C) is correct because Transfer Appliance bypasses network bandwidth limitations entirely. For datasets larger than 20 TB or when network transfer would take more than a week, Transfer Appliance is the recommended solution. It provides a fast, secure, and cost-effective way to migrate large volumes of data without consuming bandwidth or causing network congestion.
D) is incorrect because while Cloud Dataflow is excellent for data processing and transformation, setting up a VPN and streaming 50 TB of data would still be constrained by the limited network bandwidth. This approach would be slow and potentially expensive due to extended VPN connection time and data transfer costs.
Question 2
You are designing a real-time analytics pipeline that ingests streaming data from IoT devices. The data arrives at a rate of 100,000 events per second. You need to perform aggregations over sliding time windows and store the results in BigQuery. Which combination of services should you use?
A) Cloud Pub/Sub → Cloud Functions → BigQuery
B) Cloud Pub/Sub → Dataflow → BigQuery
C) Cloud Pub/Sub → Cloud Run → Cloud SQL → BigQuery
D) Cloud Storage → Cloud Dataproc → BigQuery
Answer: B
Explanation:
This question evaluates understanding of streaming data architecture on Google Cloud Platform, particularly for high-throughput scenarios requiring complex windowing operations.
Real-time analytics pipelines require components that can handle high-velocity data streams, perform windowed aggregations, and reliably deliver results to a data warehouse. The combination of Cloud Pub/Sub, Dataflow, and BigQuery represents Google Cloud’s recommended architecture for streaming analytics at scale.
Cloud Pub/Sub serves as the ingestion layer, providing a globally distributed, auto-scaling message queue that can easily handle 100,000 events per second. Dataflow, Google’s managed Apache Beam service, is specifically designed for streaming data processing with native support for windowing operations like sliding windows, tumbling windows, and session windows. It can perform complex transformations and aggregations in real-time before writing to BigQuery.
A) is incorrect because while Cloud Functions can process Pub/Sub messages, it’s not designed for complex streaming aggregations over time windows. Cloud Functions executes independently for each message or small batch, making it difficult to maintain state across time windows. At 100,000 events per second, you would also face scaling and cost challenges.
B) is correct because this architecture provides end-to-end streaming capabilities. Pub/Sub handles ingestion with automatic scaling and message durability. Dataflow processes the stream with sophisticated windowing operations, stateful transformations, and exactly-once processing semantics. BigQuery receives the aggregated results via the BigQuery Streaming API or batch loads, providing immediate query availability.
C) is incorrect because Cloud Run, while capable of handling HTTP requests at scale, adds unnecessary complexity for streaming pipelines. Introducing Cloud SQL as an intermediary creates a bottleneck and doesn’t provide the windowing capabilities needed. This architecture would struggle with the throughput requirements and real-time processing needs.
D) is incorrect because Cloud Storage is designed for batch processing, not real-time streaming. Using Storage would introduce latency as data accumulates before processing. Cloud Dataproc, while capable of processing streaming data, requires more operational overhead compared to the fully managed Dataflow service.
Question 3
Your organization has multiple data sources including MySQL databases, PostgreSQL databases, and various SaaS applications. You need to replicate all this data into BigQuery for analytics while minimizing operational overhead. What is the best approach?
A) Write custom Python scripts to extract data from each source and load into BigQuery
B) Use Datastream for database replication and BigQuery Data Transfer Service for SaaS applications
C) Set up Cloud SQL replicas and use Dataflow to move data to BigQuery
D) Export data to Cloud Storage from all sources and use BigQuery load jobs
Answer: B
Explanation:
This question tests knowledge of Google Cloud’s managed data integration services and their appropriate use cases. The key requirement is minimizing operational overhead while handling diverse data sources.
Modern data platforms require efficient methods to consolidate data from heterogeneous sources. Google Cloud provides purpose-built managed services that reduce the complexity of building and maintaining custom integration pipelines.
Datastream is Google Cloud’s serverless change data capture (CDC) and replication service specifically designed for databases. It can continuously replicate data from MySQL and PostgreSQL databases to BigQuery with low latency and minimal impact on source systems. The BigQuery Data Transfer Service provides pre-built connectors for popular SaaS applications like Google Ads, YouTube, and Salesforce, enabling scheduled data transfers without custom code.
A) is incorrect because custom Python scripts create significant operational overhead. You would need to handle change detection, incremental updates, error handling, monitoring, and maintenance. This approach also requires infrastructure to run the scripts and doesn’t scale well as data sources grow.
B) is correct because it leverages fully managed services designed specifically for these use cases. Datastream handles database replication with CDC capabilities, automatically detecting and replicating changes with minimal latency. The BigQuery Data Transfer Service provides turnkey integration with SaaS applications through maintained connectors. Both services are serverless, eliminating infrastructure management and reducing operational overhead significantly.
C) is incorrect because setting up Cloud SQL replicas adds unnecessary complexity and cost. Cloud SQL replicas are primarily for high availability and read scaling, not for data integration. Using Dataflow would require custom pipeline development and maintenance, increasing operational overhead rather than minimizing it.
D) is incorrect because manual exports don’t provide real-time or near-real-time data synchronization. This batch-oriented approach requires custom export logic for each source system, scheduling mechanisms, and doesn’t capture incremental changes efficiently. It creates operational overhead and doesn’t meet modern analytics requirements for fresh data.
Question 4
You need to build a machine learning model that predicts customer churn using historical transaction data stored in BigQuery. The dataset contains 10 million rows with 50 features. You want to quickly experiment with different models without managing infrastructure. What is the most appropriate approach?
A) Export data to CSV, use Vertex AI Workbench for model development, and deploy to Vertex AI
B) Use BigQuery ML to create and train models directly in BigQuery
C) Set up a Dataproc cluster with Spark MLlib for model training
D) Export data to Cloud Storage and use AutoML Tables
Answer: B
Explanation:
This question assesses understanding of machine learning options on Google Cloud, particularly when data already resides in BigQuery and the priority is rapid experimentation with minimal infrastructure management.
BigQuery ML enables data analysts and engineers to create and execute machine learning models directly within BigQuery using SQL. This approach eliminates the need for data movement, reduces complexity, and accelerates the experimentation cycle. For supervised learning tasks like churn prediction with structured data already in BigQuery, BigQuery ML provides an ideal solution.
BigQuery ML supports various model types including logistic regression, linear regression, deep neural networks, boosted trees, and AutoML models. The SQL-based interface allows quick iteration through different algorithms and hyperparameters. Models trained in BigQuery ML can be evaluated, used for batch prediction, or exported for online serving.
A) is incorrect because exporting 10 million rows to CSV introduces unnecessary data movement overhead and latency. While Vertex AI Workbench provides a robust development environment for complex ML workflows, this approach requires more setup time and infrastructure considerations compared to using BigQuery ML for initial experimentation. The question emphasizes quick experimentation without infrastructure management.
B) is correct because BigQuery ML allows you to create models using SQL statements directly on data in BigQuery. You can quickly experiment with different algorithms using simple CREATE MODEL statements, evaluate performance with ML.EVALUATE, and make predictions with ML.PREDICT. This approach requires zero infrastructure management, keeps data in place, and provides the fastest path to experimentation for structured data scenarios.
C) is incorrect because Dataproc requires cluster management, configuration, and monitoring, which contradicts the requirement of not managing infrastructure. While Spark MLlib is powerful for distributed machine learning, setting up and maintaining a Dataproc cluster adds operational complexity unnecessary for this use case.
D) is incorrect because while AutoML Tables provides excellent automated model development, it requires exporting data from BigQuery and involves additional data movement. AutoML Tables is better suited when you need maximum accuracy with minimal ML expertise, but BigQuery ML provides faster experimentation cycles when your data is already in BigQuery and you want to test multiple approaches quickly.
Question 5
Your data pipeline processes streaming events and needs to deduplicate records based on a unique event ID. Events may arrive out of order, and duplicates can appear within a 10-minute window. Which Dataflow transform should you use?
A) GroupByKey with a sliding window
B) Distinct transform with a fixed window
C) Combine transform with a session window
D) RemoveDuplicates transform or Distinct with appropriate windowing
Answer: D
Explanation:
This question tests understanding of Apache Beam transforms in Cloud Dataflow, specifically for handling duplicate data in streaming pipelines with timing considerations.
Deduplication in streaming systems requires careful consideration of windowing strategies and the nature of duplicate arrivals. When duplicates can arrive within a specific time window and events may be out of order, you need a transform that can maintain state within windows to identify and remove duplicates based on a key.
The Distinct transform (or RemoveDuplicates in some Beam SDKs) is specifically designed for deduplication. When combined with appropriate windowing, it maintains state within each window to track seen elements and filter out duplicates. For a 10-minute deduplication window with out-of-order events, you would typically use a fixed or sliding window of appropriate duration with allowed lateness to handle the out-of-order arrivals.
A) is incorrect because GroupByKey alone doesn’t perform deduplication. While it groups elements by key within windows, it collects all values for each key rather than removing duplicates. You would need additional logic after GroupByKey to filter duplicates, making this approach more complex than necessary.
B) is close but incomplete. While Distinct with fixed windows can work for deduplication, the answer should acknowledge that proper handling of out-of-order data requires configuring allowed lateness on the window. A fixed 10-minute window with appropriate allowed lateness settings would handle the requirements described.
C) is incorrect because session windows are designed for grouping events based on activity gaps, not for deduplication within a fixed time period. Session windows create variable-length windows based on inactivity, which doesn’t match the requirement of deduplicating within a specific 10-minute timeframe.
D) is correct because RemoveDuplicates (or Distinct) transform is purpose-built for deduplication scenarios. When configured with appropriate windowing strategy (typically fixed windows matching your deduplication period) and allowed lateness to handle out-of-order arrivals, it efficiently removes duplicates based on the event ID while accounting for timing variations in event arrival.
Question 6
You are building a data lake on Google Cloud Storage. The data includes both frequently accessed hot data and rarely accessed cold data for compliance purposes. You want to optimize storage costs while maintaining appropriate access performance. What storage strategy should you implement?
A) Store all data in Standard storage class and manually move old data to Nearline storage
B) Use Standard storage for hot data and Archive storage for cold data with lifecycle policies
C) Store all data in Coldline storage to minimize costs across all data
D) Use Standard storage with Object Lifecycle Management to automatically transition data through storage classes
Answer: D
Explanation:
This question evaluates understanding of Cloud Storage classes and Object Lifecycle Management for cost optimization in data lake architectures.
Google Cloud Storage offers multiple storage classes optimized for different access patterns: Standard for frequently accessed data, Nearline for monthly access, Coldline for quarterly access, and Archive for annual access. Each class has different storage costs and access fees. Object Lifecycle Management allows automatic transition of objects between storage classes based on age or other conditions, eliminating manual management overhead.
For a data lake with mixed access patterns, the optimal strategy uses appropriate storage classes for different data temperatures while automating transitions as data ages and access patterns change. This balances cost optimization with operational efficiency.
A) is incorrect because manual data movement creates significant operational overhead and is error-prone. As data volumes grow, manual management becomes impractical. Additionally, moving directly from Standard to Nearline might not be the most cost-effective path for data that will age further into cold storage.
B) is partially correct in concept but operationally flawed. While using different storage classes for different data temperatures is correct, manually managing the distinction between hot and cold data creates operational burden. Archive storage is also optimized for data accessed less than once per year, which may be too restrictive for compliance data that occasionally needs access.
C) is incorrect because storing all data including hot data in Coldline storage is counterproductive. While Coldline has lower storage costs, it has higher access costs and retrieval latency. Frequently accessed hot data would incur excessive access charges and poor performance, ultimately costing more than using appropriate storage classes.
D) is correct because Object Lifecycle Management provides automated, policy-based transitions between storage classes as data ages. You can configure rules to transition objects from Standard to Nearline after 30 days, then to Coldline after 90 days, and finally to Archive after one year. This approach optimizes costs automatically based on data age as a proxy for access patterns, maintains appropriate performance for hot data, and eliminates manual management overhead.
Question 7
Your company runs daily batch jobs that process large datasets stored in Cloud Storage using Dataproc. Jobs typically complete in 2-3 hours. You want to minimize costs while maintaining job completion times. What cluster configuration should you use?
A) Use a persistent cluster with preemptible workers only
B) Use ephemeral clusters with a mix of standard and preemptible workers
C) Use a persistent cluster with standard workers only
D) Use ephemeral clusters with preemptible workers only
Answer: B
Explanation:
This question tests understanding of Dataproc cluster optimization strategies, particularly regarding cluster lifecycle management and the use of preemptible VMs for cost reduction.
Dataproc pricing includes both cluster compute costs and a small Dataproc service fee. For workloads that run on schedules rather than continuously, ephemeral clusters (created for each job and deleted after completion) eliminate idle time costs. Preemptible VMs offer up to 80% cost savings but can be terminated by Google Cloud with 30 seconds notice, making them ideal for fault-tolerant batch processing but risky as the sole compute resource for time-sensitive jobs.
The optimal configuration balances cost savings from preemptible VMs with job reliability from standard VMs. Using ephemeral clusters eliminates paying for unused capacity between jobs, while a mixed worker configuration provides cost benefits from preemptible VMs without risking job completion if preemptions occur.
A) is incorrect because using only preemptible workers creates reliability risks. If multiple preemptible workers are terminated during critical phases of your job, particularly near completion, the job could fail or experience significant delays. For jobs with completion time requirements, relying exclusively on preemptible capacity is too risky.
B) is correct because ephemeral clusters with mixed worker types provide optimal cost-performance balance. The ephemeral approach eliminates costs during the 21-22 hours daily when jobs aren’t running. Using standard workers for the master node and some worker nodes ensures job reliability, while preemptible workers handle the bulk of processing for significant cost savings. If preemptible workers are lost, the job continues on standard workers with minimal impact.
C) is incorrect because persistent clusters with standard workers only provides reliability but misses significant cost optimization opportunities. You pay for cluster capacity 24/7 even though jobs run only 2-3 hours daily. Additionally, not using any preemptible workers forgoes substantial cost savings available for batch processing workloads.
D) is incorrect because while ephemeral clusters are correct, using only preemptible workers creates unacceptable reliability risk for time-sensitive jobs. Batch jobs with completion time requirements need some guaranteed capacity. If widespread preemptions occur, an all-preemptible cluster could fail to complete within the required timeframe.
Question 8
You need to design a data warehouse schema in BigQuery for retail sales analysis. The business requires fast query performance for various dimensions including time, product, store, and customer. Which schema design approach is most appropriate?
A) Normalized schema with multiple tables joined through foreign keys
B) Star schema with denormalized fact and dimension tables
C) Single wide table with all data denormalized
D) Snowflake schema with normalized dimension tables
Answer: B
Explanation:
This question assesses understanding of dimensional modeling and BigQuery-specific schema design best practices for analytical workloads.
BigQuery is a columnar storage engine optimized for analytical queries. Unlike traditional relational databases, BigQuery performs best with denormalized schemas that minimize joins. However, complete denormalization into a single table can create maintenance challenges and data redundancy issues. The star schema provides an optimal balance between query performance and data management.
A star schema organizes data into fact tables (containing measures and foreign keys) surrounded by dimension tables (containing descriptive attributes). In BigQuery, this design leverages the query engine’s join optimization while maintaining logical data organization. Dimension tables are typically denormalized, and the reduced number of joins compared to normalized schemas improves performance.
A) is incorrect because normalized schemas with multiple tables and extensive joins are designed to minimize storage redundancy in transactional systems, not to optimize analytical query performance. In BigQuery, complex join operations across many normalized tables create performance overhead. This approach contradicts BigQuery best practices for analytical workloads.
B) is correct because the star schema is the recommended dimensional modeling approach for BigQuery. It provides excellent query performance through limited joins, maintains clear business logic through separated facts and dimensions, and allows efficient filtering through dimension tables. BigQuery’s join optimization handles star schema queries efficiently, and the denormalized dimension tables reduce query complexity while remaining manageable in size.
C) is incorrect because while a single wide table eliminates joins entirely, it creates significant maintenance and efficiency challenges. Updates to dimension attributes require updating every fact row, schema evolution becomes difficult, and storage costs increase due to massive data redundancy. This approach also makes it harder to manage slowly changing dimensions and can lead to very wide tables that are difficult to understand and maintain.
D) is incorrect because snowflake schemas with normalized dimension tables introduce excessive joins that hurt BigQuery query performance. While snowflake schemas reduce redundancy in dimension tables, BigQuery’s storage costs are low enough that this benefit doesn’t outweigh the performance cost of additional joins required to navigate the normalized dimension hierarchies.
Question 9
Your streaming pipeline in Dataflow needs to write data to BigQuery. The pipeline processes 50,000 records per second, and you need to ensure exactly-once semantics with minimal latency. What is the recommended approach for writing to BigQuery?
A) Use BigQuery Storage Write API with pending mode
B) Use BigQuery Streaming Insert API
C) Buffer data and use batch load jobs every minute
D) Write to Cloud Storage first, then load into BigQuery
Answer: A
Explanation:
This question evaluates knowledge of BigQuery data ingestion methods, particularly for high-throughput streaming scenarios requiring exactly-once guarantees.
BigQuery offers multiple ingestion methods, each with different characteristics regarding throughput, latency, cost, and delivery semantics. For streaming pipelines with high throughput and strict exactly-once requirements, the choice of ingestion method significantly impacts both system reliability and cost.
The BigQuery Storage Write API is the newer, recommended approach for streaming data ingestion. It provides exactly-once delivery semantics, better performance, and lower cost compared to the legacy Streaming Insert API. The pending mode allows for atomic commits of batch records, ensuring exactly-once semantics while maintaining low latency.
A) is correct because the BigQuery Storage Write API with pending mode provides exactly-once semantics through transactional commits. It can handle high throughput efficiently, offers lower cost than Streaming Inserts, and provides sub-second latency. Dataflow’s BigQuery I/O connector uses this API by default for streaming writes when exactly-once mode is enabled, making it the recommended approach for production pipelines.
B) is incorrect because while the Streaming Insert API provides low-latency ingestion, it offers at-least-once semantics, not exactly-once. This means duplicates can occur, requiring deduplication logic. Additionally, Streaming Inserts are more expensive than the Storage Write API and have been superseded by the newer API for most use cases.
C) is incorrect because buffering data for one-minute batch loads introduces unnecessary latency that contradicts the minimal latency requirement. While batch loads are cost-effective and provide exactly-once semantics, they’re better suited for scenarios where minute-level latency is acceptable, not for streaming pipelines requiring near-real-time data availability.
D) is incorrect because writing to Cloud Storage as an intermediary adds complexity, latency, and operational overhead. This two-stage approach requires additional orchestration and delays data availability in BigQuery. It’s more appropriate for scenarios requiring data lake storage or when processing extremely large batch uploads rather than streaming ingestion.
Question 10
You are designing a data governance strategy for your organization’s data lake. You need to implement fine-grained access control, data lineage tracking, and data discovery capabilities. Which combination of services should you use?
A) Cloud IAM for access control, Data Catalog for metadata management, and Cloud Logging for lineage
B) Cloud IAM and BigQuery column-level security for access control, Dataplex for governance, and Data Catalog for discovery
C) Cloud IAM only with resource hierarchy for all governance needs
D) Third-party data governance tools integrated with Cloud Storage
Answer: B
Explanation:
This question tests understanding of Google Cloud’s data governance capabilities and how multiple services work together to provide comprehensive governance.
Modern data governance requires multiple capabilities working together: access control to protect sensitive data, metadata management for data discovery, lineage tracking to understand data flow, and policy enforcement across the data estate. Google Cloud provides integrated services that address these needs.
Dataplex is Google’s data governance service that provides unified management across data lakes and data warehouses. It offers capabilities for data organization, automated data quality monitoring, policy management, and lineage tracking. When combined with Cloud IAM, BigQuery’s fine-grained security features, and Data Catalog, it provides comprehensive governance.
A) is incorrect because while Cloud IAM provides resource-level access control and Data Catalog enables metadata management and discovery, Cloud Logging alone doesn’t provide purpose-built data lineage tracking. Lineage requires understanding data transformations and relationships, which logging doesn’t capture in a structured, queryable format suitable for governance needs.
B) is correct because this combination provides comprehensive governance capabilities. Cloud IAM handles resource-level access control while BigQuery column-level security enables fine-grained access to sensitive columns. Dataplex provides centralized governance including data organization, quality monitoring, automated discovery, and lineage tracking across your data estate. Data Catalog enhances discovery with metadata search and tagging. This integrated approach addresses all stated requirements effectively.
C) is incorrect because Cloud IAM alone cannot provide the full range of governance capabilities needed. While IAM excels at access control through resource hierarchy and policies, it doesn’t offer data lineage tracking, metadata management, data discovery, or data quality monitoring. Governance requires more than access control to be effective.
D) is incorrect because while third-party tools can integrate with Google Cloud, the question asks for the most appropriate combination of services, implying native Google Cloud solutions. Google provides comprehensive built-in governance capabilities that are more tightly integrated with cloud services, easier to deploy, and don’t require managing third-party software or additional integration complexity.
Question 11
Your organization needs to migrate a PostgreSQL database to Google Cloud. The database is 2 TB in size, and you need to minimize downtime during migration while maintaining data consistency. What is the recommended migration approach?
A) Use pg_dump to export data and load it into Cloud SQL PostgreSQL
B) Use Database Migration Service with continuous replication
C) Set up streaming replication from on-premises to Cloud SQL
D) Export data to CSV files, upload to Cloud Storage, and import to Cloud SQL
Answer: B
Explanation:
This question assesses knowledge of database migration strategies on Google Cloud, particularly for scenarios requiring minimal downtime and data consistency.
Database migrations present challenges around downtime, data consistency, and complexity. For production systems, organizations typically cannot afford extended outages. The migration approach must support continuous operation of the source system while ensuring the target system receives all changes up to the cutover point.
Database Migration Service is Google Cloud’s managed service specifically designed for database migrations. It supports continuous replication from source databases to Cloud SQL, allowing the source system to remain operational during migration. Once initial replication completes and replication lag is minimal, you can perform a quick cutover with minimal downtime.
A) is incorrect because pg_dump creates a point-in-time export, requiring the database to be in a consistent state during the dump and causing extended downtime for a 2 TB database. The export and import process could take many hours, during which the database would need to be read-only or offline. This doesn’t meet the minimal downtime requirement.
B) is correct because Database Migration Service provides the optimal migration path with minimal downtime. It performs an initial full migration, then continuously replicates changes from the source PostgreSQL database to Cloud SQL. You can monitor replication lag and perform cutover when lag is minimal, resulting in downtime measured in minutes rather than hours. The service handles complexity around connection management, monitoring, and validation.
C) is partially correct in concept but incorrect in implementation. While continuous replication is the right approach, Cloud SQL PostgreSQL doesn’t natively support being a replica of an external PostgreSQL server through standard streaming replication. You would need to use Database Migration Service, which handles the replication mechanism, rather than attempting to configure streaming replication directly.
D) is incorrect because exporting to CSV files creates the same downtime problem as pg_dump but with additional complexity. Converting database schemas and data to CSV, transferring files, and importing them is time-consuming and error-prone. This approach doesn’t provide continuous replication, requires extended downtime, and involves manual handling of schema migration and data type conversions.
Question 12
You need to build a data pipeline that processes JSON files from Cloud Storage, transforms the data, and loads it into BigQuery. The pipeline should handle schema evolution automatically as new fields are added to the JSON files. Which approach should you use?
A) Use Cloud Functions to parse JSON and insert into BigQuery with a fixed schema
B) Use Dataflow with schema autodetection and BigQuery dynamic destinations
C) Use BigQuery load jobs with autodetect schema and schema update options
D) Manually update BigQuery schema when new fields appear
Answer: C
Explanation:
This question tests understanding of BigQuery schema management and data loading options, particularly for handling evolving schemas.
Schema evolution is common in data pipelines, especially when dealing with semi-structured data like JSON. As applications evolve, new fields appear in the data. Data pipelines must handle these changes gracefully without manual intervention or pipeline failures.
BigQuery provides schema autodetection during load operations, which can infer schema from JSON or CSV files. Combined with schema update options, BigQuery can automatically add new fields to existing tables, enabling seamless schema evolution.
A) is incorrect because using a fixed schema contradicts the requirement for automatic schema evolution. When new fields appear in JSON files, Cloud Functions with a fixed schema would either ignore the new fields or fail to insert records. This approach requires manual intervention to update the schema and redeploy the function whenever fields are added.
B) is close but more complex than necessary. While Dataflow can handle schema evolution with appropriate configuration, it requires building and maintaining a Dataflow pipeline. For the straightforward use case of loading JSON files into BigQuery with schema evolution, Dataflow adds unnecessary complexity compared to using BigQuery’s native load capabilities.
C) is correct because BigQuery load jobs with autodetect and schema update options provide the simplest solution for schema evolution. When loading JSON files, you can enable autodetect to infer the schema and use ALLOW_FIELD_ADDITION in schema update options to automatically add new fields to the target table. This approach requires minimal code, leverages BigQuery’s native capabilities, and handles schema evolution automatically without pipeline modifications.
D) is incorrect because manual schema updates contradict the requirement for automatic handling of schema evolution. Manual processes are error-prone, create delays in data availability, and require monitoring to detect when new fields appear. This approach doesn’t scale as data sources and schemas evolve.
Question 13
Your company analyzes clickstream data for real-time personalization. Events arrive continuously, and you need to compute user activity metrics over the last 30 minutes for each user, updating every 5 minutes. Which Dataflow windowing strategy should you use?
A) Fixed window of 5 minutes
B) Sliding window of 30 minutes, advancing every 5 minutes
C) Session window with 5-minute gap duration
D) Global window with periodic triggers every 5 minutes
Answer: B
Explanation:
This question evaluates understanding of windowing strategies in Apache Beam and Cloud Dataflow, particularly for scenarios requiring overlapping time-based aggregations.
Windowing determines how data is grouped for aggregation in streaming pipelines. Different windowing strategies serve different analytical needs. For metrics that need to reflect a rolling time period updated at regular intervals, the window type must capture overlapping time ranges while producing results at the desired frequency.
Sliding windows create overlapping windows of a specified duration that advance by a smaller interval. This produces continuous updates covering a rolling time period, which is ideal for real-time dashboards and personalization systems that need recent activity metrics.
A) is incorrect because fixed windows of 5 minutes would only show activity within each discrete 5-minute period, not a rolling 30-minute view. Each window would be independent, showing only the 5 minutes of data it contains. This doesn’t meet the requirement of computing metrics over the last 30 minutes.
B) is correct because a sliding window of 30 minutes advancing every 5 minutes produces exactly the required behavior. Every 5 minutes, Dataflow outputs aggregated metrics covering the previous 30 minutes of events for each user. The windows overlap, ensuring continuous coverage and providing the rolling 30-minute view needed for real-time personalization.
C) is incorrect because session windows are designed to group events based on activity gaps, not fixed time periods. A session window with a 5-minute gap would create variable-length windows based on user inactivity. This doesn’t provide consistent 30-minute aggregations and wouldn’t update at regular 5-minute intervals as required.
D) is incorrect because global windows don’t partition data by time, instead treating all data as one unbounded window. While triggers could produce output every 5 minutes, global windows don’t provide the time-bounded 30-minute rolling aggregation needed. You would need complex trigger logic to manually implement rolling window behavior, which is unnecessary when sliding windows provide this functionality natively.
Question 14
You need to optimize a BigQuery table that contains 5 years of sales transactions totaling 10 billion rows. Queries typically filter by transaction date and region. The table is frequently updated with new transactions. What optimization techniques should you apply?
A) Partition by transaction date and cluster by region
B) Cluster by transaction date only
C) Create a materialized view with aggregated data
D) Partition by region and cluster by transaction date
Answer: A
Explanation:
This question tests understanding of BigQuery performance optimization techniques, specifically partitioning and clustering for large tables with common query patterns.
BigQuery provides partitioning and clustering as complementary optimization techniques. Partitioning divides tables into segments based on a column value, allowing queries to scan only relevant partitions. Clustering sorts data within partitions based on specified columns, improving performance for queries filtering or aggregating on those columns. Effective use of these features can dramatically reduce query costs and improve performance.
For a large table with billions of rows that’s frequently queried by date and region, combining partitioning and clustering provides optimal performance. Partitioning typically works best with timestamp or date columns that naturally segment data into manageable chunks.
A) is correct because partitioning by transaction date and clustering by region provides optimal query performance and cost efficiency. Date-based partitioning allows queries to scan only relevant days, months, or years of data, potentially reducing scanned data by orders of magnitude. Within each partition, clustering by region further optimizes queries that filter by region. This combination addresses both common query patterns efficiently. Additionally, partitioning supports efficient data lifecycle management through partition expiration.
B) is incorrect because clustering alone without partitioning misses significant optimization opportunities for time-series data. While clustering by date would improve some queries, it doesn’t provide the dramatic scan reduction that partitioning offers. For a 5-year table, queries filtering by specific date ranges would still need to scan the entire table, just in a sorted order. Partitioning by date would reduce costs and improve performance more effectively.
C) is incorrect as a complete solution because materialized views, while useful for pre-computing common aggregations, don’t replace table-level optimizations. Materialized views would help if queries consistently aggregate data in specific ways, but they don’t optimize the base table for a diverse range of queries. Additionally, materialized views add storage costs and maintenance overhead. The question asks about optimizing the table itself for queries that filter by date and region, which partitioning and clustering address directly.
D) is incorrect because partitioning by region is less effective than partitioning by date for this use case. Region typically has low cardinality (dozens of regions versus thousands of days), resulting in fewer, much larger partitions. This provides less query optimization benefit. More importantly, time-based partitioning enables automatic partition expiration for data lifecycle management, which is valuable for multi-year transactional data. Clustering by date within region partitions would also be less effective than the reverse configuration.
Question 15
Your data science team needs to access sensitive customer data in BigQuery for model training, but they should not see personally identifiable information (PII) like email addresses and phone numbers. What is the most appropriate solution?
A) Create a view that excludes PII columns and grant access to the view
B) Use BigQuery column-level security with data masking policies
C) Export data to a separate table with PII removed and grant access to that table
D) Use Cloud Data Loss Prevention API to redact PII before querying
Answer: B
Explanation:
This question assesses understanding of BigQuery security features for protecting sensitive data while enabling appropriate data access for different users.
Data protection requires balancing security with usability. Data scientists need access to customer data for analysis and model training, but regulatory requirements and privacy best practices demand restricting access to PII. The solution should protect sensitive fields without requiring data duplication or complex workflows.
BigQuery column-level security allows fine-grained access control at the column level within tables. Combined with data masking policies, it can dynamically mask or redact sensitive data based on user identity and policy rules. This provides flexible, policy-based protection without data duplication.
A) is partially correct but has limitations. While views can exclude PII columns, this approach is inflexible and creates maintenance overhead. If the data science team needs different levels of access for different projects, you would need multiple views. Views also don’t support dynamic masking where different users see different versions of the same column. Additionally, users with appropriate permissions on the base table could bypass the view.
B) is correct because BigQuery column-level security with data masking provides the most robust and flexible solution. You can create data masking policies that automatically mask or nullify PII columns like email and phone numbers for specific users or groups while allowing full access to other columns. The same table serves all users with appropriate data protection applied transparently based on identity. Policies are centrally managed, auditable, and don’t require data duplication or complex query rewrites.
C) is incorrect because creating separate tables with PII removed introduces significant operational overhead. You must maintain data synchronization between the original and sanitized tables, consuming additional storage and processing resources. Schema changes require updating multiple tables. This approach also creates data governance complexity with multiple copies of similar data. Data duplication increases risk and maintenance burden.
D) is incorrect because using Cloud DLP API at query time would introduce significant latency and complexity. The DLP API is designed for discovering and protecting PII in data at rest or in transit, not for dynamic query-time redaction. Integrating DLP API calls into every query would be slow, expensive, and architecturally complex. DLP is better suited for data inspection and classification rather than ongoing access control.
Question 16
You are designing a data pipeline that needs to join streaming data from Cloud Pub/Sub with reference data stored in Cloud SQL. The reference data is updated daily and is approximately 500 MB. What is the most efficient approach for implementing this join in Dataflow?
A) Use side inputs to load reference data from Cloud SQL into Dataflow
B) Stream reference data through Pub/Sub alongside event data
C) Use Dataflow to query Cloud SQL for each event using external lookups
D) Replicate Cloud SQL data to BigQuery and use BigQuery side inputs
Answer: A
Explanation:
This question tests understanding of Dataflow design patterns for enriching streaming data with reference data, particularly regarding performance and efficiency considerations.
Streaming pipelines often need to enrich events with additional information from reference data sources. The join pattern must balance data freshness requirements, lookup performance, and operational complexity. For reference data that changes infrequently relative to stream velocity, side inputs provide an efficient pattern.
Side inputs in Dataflow allow you to broadcast relatively small datasets to all workers, making the data available for lookups during stream processing. For reference data that fits in memory and updates daily, this approach provides fast lookups without external dependencies during processing.
A) is correct because side inputs provide the most efficient approach for this scenario. You can periodically load the 500 MB reference dataset from Cloud SQL into a side input that’s distributed to all Dataflow workers. Each worker has local access to the complete reference data, enabling fast in-memory lookups without network calls for each event. Since the data updates only daily, you can refresh the side input on a daily schedule. This approach provides excellent performance and simplifies the pipeline architecture.
B) is incorrect because streaming reference data through Pub/Sub alongside events is inefficient and creates complexity. You would need complex windowing and state management to ensure reference data is available before processing corresponding events. The 500 MB dataset streamed repeatedly would consume unnecessary bandwidth and Pub/Sub quota. This approach is better suited for scenarios where reference data changes frequently and updates need immediate propagation.
C) is incorrect because querying Cloud SQL for each event would create severe performance bottlenecks. With thousands or millions of events per second, individual database queries per event would overwhelm Cloud SQL and introduce significant latency. Network round-trips for each lookup would slow processing dramatically. This pattern might work for low-volume streams but is inappropriate for typical streaming scenarios.
D) is unnecessarily complex. While BigQuery side inputs are a valid Dataflow pattern, adding an extra replication step from Cloud SQL to BigQuery introduces operational overhead and potential data freshness delays. Since the reference data is only 500 MB and Dataflow can load directly from Cloud SQL, the additional BigQuery layer adds complexity without meaningful benefit. Direct Cloud SQL to Dataflow side input is simpler and equally effective.
Question 17
Your organization uses BigQuery for analytics and needs to ensure that queries from the marketing team do not impact the performance of queries from the finance team. Both teams run queries throughout the day with varying resource requirements. What feature should you implement?
A) Create separate BigQuery projects for each team
B) Use BigQuery reservations with separate slots for each team
C) Schedule queries to run at different times for each team
D) Use query priority settings to differentiate team queries
Answer: B
Explanation:
This question evaluates understanding of BigQuery resource management and workload isolation capabilities for multi-tenant scenarios.
BigQuery uses slots as units of computational capacity for query execution. By default, BigQuery allocates slots dynamically from a shared pool, which can lead to resource contention when multiple users or teams run concurrent queries. For organizations requiring predictable performance and workload isolation, BigQuery provides reservations for dedicated resource allocation.
Reservations allow you to purchase dedicated slot capacity and assign it to specific projects, folders, or organizations. This ensures guaranteed resources for critical workloads and prevents resource contention between different teams or use cases.
A) is incorrect because separate projects alone don’t provide resource isolation in BigQuery. All projects within an organization still compete for slots from the shared pool unless reservations are configured. While separate projects provide organizational and billing separation, they don’t solve the performance isolation problem. Queries from both teams would still potentially impact each other’s performance.
B) is correct because BigQuery reservations with separate slot allocations provide true workload isolation. You can create reservations with dedicated slot capacity for each team and assign them to respective projects. The marketing team’s queries consume only their allocated slots, and the finance team’s queries consume their separate allocation. This ensures predictable performance for both teams regardless of concurrent usage. Reservations can also provide cost predictability with flat-rate pricing.
C) is incorrect because scheduling queries at different times is an operational workaround that doesn’t solve the underlying resource contention issue. This approach limits both teams’ flexibility to run analyses when needed and doesn’t address ad-hoc query requirements. Modern analytics requires on-demand access, making scheduled time-slicing impractical for most organizations. This approach also breaks down as teams and query volumes grow.
D) is incorrect because query priority settings don’t provide true resource isolation or guaranteed performance. Priority affects scheduling order when resources are constrained but doesn’t dedicate specific capacity to teams. High-priority queries can still experience slowdowns if sufficient slots aren’t available. Priority is useful for differentiating between interactive and batch queries within a team but doesn’t solve multi-team resource contention effectively.
Question 18
You need to implement a data quality monitoring system that checks for anomalies in daily data loads to BigQuery. The system should detect issues like unexpected null values, out-of-range values, and significant volume changes. What is the most comprehensive approach?
A) Write SQL queries in BigQuery to check data quality rules after each load
B) Use Dataplex data quality rules and monitoring
C) Implement custom Dataflow pipelines with validation logic
D) Use dbt tests for data quality validation
Answer: B
Explanation:
This question tests knowledge of data quality management tools and best practices on Google Cloud, particularly for comprehensive monitoring scenarios.
Data quality is critical for trustworthy analytics and decision-making. Comprehensive data quality monitoring requires capabilities for defining quality rules, automated execution, anomaly detection, alerting, and tracking quality metrics over time. While various tools can implement data quality checks, purpose-built data governance platforms provide the most complete solution.
Dataplex includes data quality capabilities that allow you to define rules for completeness, accuracy, consistency, and validity. It can automatically execute these rules, detect anomalies, send alerts, and track data quality metrics over time through a unified interface.
A) is partially correct but limited. While SQL queries can implement specific data quality checks, this approach requires significant custom development for rule management, scheduling, anomaly detection algorithms, alerting, and historical tracking. You would need to build infrastructure for orchestrating checks, storing results, and visualizing trends. This custom solution lacks the comprehensive features of purpose-built data quality platforms.
B) is correct because Dataplex data quality provides comprehensive capabilities specifically designed for this use case. You can define quality rules through configuration rather than code, including checks for nullness, range validation, uniqueness, and statistical anomalies. Dataplex automatically executes rules on schedules or after data loads, maintains quality scores and trends, provides anomaly detection, and integrates with monitoring systems for alerting. This managed approach reduces development and operational overhead while providing enterprise-grade data quality management.
C) is incorrect because building custom Dataflow pipelines for data quality validation is over-engineered for this requirement. While Dataflow can implement validation logic, you would need significant custom development for rule definition, anomaly detection algorithms, result storage, alerting, and monitoring dashboards. Dataflow is better suited for data transformation and processing rather than serving as a data quality monitoring platform. This approach involves unnecessary complexity and maintenance burden.
D) is partially correct but has limitations. dbt tests provide excellent data quality validation capabilities for transformation pipelines, particularly for testing transformed data and model outputs. However, dbt requires setting up a dbt project and is primarily designed for transformation workflows rather than monitoring data loads into BigQuery from external sources. While viable, dbt doesn’t provide the same integrated anomaly detection and monitoring capabilities as Dataplex for comprehensive quality monitoring across the entire data estate.
Question 19
Your application writes transaction data to Cloud Spanner, and you need to replicate this data to BigQuery for analytics with minimal latency. The replication should capture all changes including inserts, updates, and deletes. What is the recommended approach?
A) Use Cloud Spanner federated queries to query data directly from BigQuery
B) Use Datastream to replicate Cloud Spanner changes to BigQuery
C) Export Cloud Spanner data periodically using Cloud Dataflow
D) Use Cloud Spanner exports to Cloud Storage, then load into BigQuery
Answer: B
Explanation:
This question assesses understanding of change data capture (CDC) and data replication patterns between operational and analytical databases on Google Cloud.
Modern architectures often separate operational (OLTP) and analytical (OLAP) workloads, using specialized databases optimized for each. However, analytics require access to operational data with minimal latency. CDC replication continuously captures changes from the operational database and propagates them to the analytical system, maintaining near-real-time data freshness.
Datastream is Google Cloud’s managed CDC service that can replicate changes from various sources including Cloud Spanner to destinations like BigQuery. It captures inserts, updates, and deletes with low latency and minimal impact on source systems.
A) is incorrect because federated queries allow BigQuery to query Cloud Spanner directly but don’t replicate data into BigQuery. Federated queries execute against the source system in real-time, which can impact Cloud Spanner performance and doesn’t provide the query performance benefits of having data in BigQuery’s columnar storage. This approach is suitable for occasional queries but not for ongoing analytics workloads requiring frequent access to operational data.
B) is correct because Datastream provides purpose-built CDC replication from Cloud Spanner to BigQuery. It continuously monitors Cloud Spanner for changes, captures all insert, update, and delete operations, and streams them to BigQuery with minimal latency. Datastream handles the complexity of change capture, serialization, and delivery, providing a managed solution that requires minimal operational overhead. This approach enables near-real-time analytics on operational data without impacting Cloud Spanner performance.
C) is incorrect because periodic exports using Dataflow don’t provide true CDC capabilities or minimal latency. Scheduled batch exports create latency gaps between exports and don’t efficiently capture incremental changes. Each export would need to scan the entire dataset or implement complex change tracking logic. This approach is more suitable for batch analytics scenarios rather than near-real-time replication requirements.
D) is incorrect because Cloud Spanner exports to Cloud Storage are designed for backup and data archival, not for ongoing CDC replication. Exports create point-in-time snapshots that must be scheduled periodically, introducing latency and missing changes that occur between exports. Loading exports into BigQuery would require orchestration and wouldn’t capture individual change operations like updates and deletes in a CDC format. This approach doesn’t meet the minimal latency requirement.
Question 20
You are building a recommendation system that needs to perform real-time feature lookups for millions of users. Features are computed daily in BigQuery and need to be accessible with sub-10ms latency during prediction serving. What architecture should you use for feature storage and retrieval?
A) Query BigQuery directly from the prediction service
B) Export features to Cloud Storage and load them into memory in the prediction service
C) Use Vertex AI Feature Store to store and serve features
D) Export features to Cloud Bigtable for low-latency lookups
Answer: C
Explanation:
This question tests understanding of feature management in machine learning systems, particularly the architectural patterns for bridging batch feature computation with real-time serving requirements.
Machine learning systems often have a feature gap between training and serving. Features computed in batch systems like BigQuery need to be served with low latency during prediction. This requires specialized infrastructure optimized for high-throughput, low-latency key-value lookups while maintaining consistency between training and serving environments.
Vertex AI Feature Store is Google Cloud’s managed service specifically designed for storing, managing, and serving ML features. It bridges batch feature engineering with online serving, providing consistent feature access across training and prediction workflows.
A) is incorrect because BigQuery is optimized for analytical queries, not operational low-latency lookups. While BigQuery can return results in seconds for analytical queries, it cannot consistently achieve sub-10ms latency required for real-time prediction serving. Direct BigQuery queries from a high-throughput prediction service would also be expensive and could impact other analytical workloads. BigQuery is designed for complex analytics, not operational feature serving.
B) is partially viable but operationally complex and doesn’t scale well. Loading millions of user features into application memory requires significant RAM, creates challenges for feature updates, and complicates horizontal scaling of the prediction service. Each service instance would need to load the complete feature set, wasting memory for features not frequently accessed. This approach also lacks the feature versioning, monitoring, and management capabilities needed for production ML systems.
C) is correct because Vertex AI Feature Store provides purpose-built infrastructure for this exact use case. You can batch-ingest features computed in BigQuery into Feature Store, which stores them in an optimized format for low-latency serving. Feature Store provides sub-10ms online serving latency, supports millions of entities, handles feature updates, maintains consistency between training and serving, provides feature versioning, and integrates seamlessly with Vertex AI training and prediction. This managed service eliminates operational complexity while providing production-grade feature management.
D) is a viable technical approach but not the most appropriate solution. While Cloud Bigtable can provide low-latency lookups and could technically serve features, it requires custom development for feature ingestion, serving logic, and feature management. You would need to build feature versioning, monitoring, and training-serving consistency mechanisms yourself. Bigtable is a general-purpose NoSQL database, not a feature-specific solution. Feature Store provides these capabilities out-of-the-box, making it the more appropriate managed solution for feature serving use cases.
