Microsoft Azure Administrator AZ-104 Practice Test 37
Question 360
An administrator wants to receive Azure Service Health communications relevant to a subscription. What should be configured?
An Azure Monitor action group containing the desired notification actions
The action group association and its recipient configuration
A scheduled log query alert using KQL
A Service Health alert routed to an action group
Explanation
Correct Answer
D:
Service Health alerts notify about platform service events affecting selected Azure scopes. The relevant situation is that an administrator wants to receive Azure Service Health communications relevant to a subscription. Metrics, logs, alerting and Network Watcher diagnostics observe different resource or flow evidence. “An Azure Monitor action group containing the desired notification actions” does not settle this requirement: action groups define reusable receivers/actions invoked by alert rules. “The action group association and its recipient configuration” does not settle this requirement: alert evaluation and notification delivery are separate configurations. Check the selected observation, monitoring scope, timing and alert or diagnostic results.
Incorrect Answers
A:
action groups define reusable receivers/actions invoked by alert rules. In this case, an administrator wants to receive Azure Service Health communications relevant to a subscription. “An Azure Monitor action group containing the desired notification actions” would not satisfy that requirement; the supported action is “A Service Health alert routed to an action group”. Service Health alerts notify about platform service events affecting selected Azure scopes.
B:
alert evaluation and notification delivery are separate configurations. In this case, an administrator wants to receive Azure Service Health communications relevant to a subscription. “The action group association and its recipient configuration” would not satisfy that requirement; the supported action is “A Service Health alert routed to an action group”. Service Health alerts notify about platform service events affecting selected Azure scopes.
C:
log alerts evaluate query results rather than fixed platform metric thresholds. In this case, an administrator wants to receive Azure Service Health communications relevant to a subscription. “A scheduled log query alert using KQL” would not satisfy that requirement; the supported action is “A Service Health alert routed to an action group”. Service Health alerts notify about platform service events affecting selected Azure scopes.
Question 361
A cost-sensitive team receives an alert every minute because CPU briefly spikes. What should be tuned?
Alert aggregation window, evaluation frequency and threshold
An Azure Monitor metric alert with an appropriate aggregation and threshold
The KQL filter conditions and alert evaluation criteria
A scheduled log query alert using KQL
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:
Alert sensitivity depends on its time window and aggregation, not only the metric name. The relevant situation is that a cost-sensitive team receives an alert every minute because CPU briefly spikes. Metrics, logs, alerting and Network Watcher diagnostics observe different resource or flow evidence. “An Azure Monitor metric alert with an appropriate aggregation and threshold” does not settle this requirement: metric alerts evaluate numeric resource time-series against configured criteria. “The KQL filter conditions and alert evaluation criteria” does not settle this requirement: narrower query predicates prevent ordinary events from matching a security or operations alert. Check the selected observation, monitoring scope, timing and alert or diagnostic results.
Incorrect Answers
B:
metric alerts evaluate numeric resource time-series against configured criteria. In this case, a cost-sensitive team receives an alert every minute because CPU briefly spikes. “An Azure Monitor metric alert with an appropriate aggregation and threshold” would not satisfy that requirement; the supported action is “Alert aggregation window, evaluation frequency and threshold”. Alert sensitivity depends on its time window and aggregation, not only the metric name.
C:
narrower query predicates prevent ordinary events from matching a security or operations alert. In this case, a cost-sensitive team receives an alert every minute because CPU briefly spikes. “The KQL filter conditions and alert evaluation criteria” would not satisfy that requirement; the supported action is “Alert aggregation window, evaluation frequency and threshold”. Alert sensitivity depends on its time window and aggregation, not only the metric name.
D:
log alerts evaluate query results rather than fixed platform metric thresholds. In this case, a cost-sensitive team receives an alert every minute because CPU briefly spikes. “A scheduled log query alert using KQL” would not satisfy that requirement; the supported action is “Alert aggregation window, evaluation frequency and threshold”. Alert sensitivity depends on its time window and aggregation, not only the metric name.
Question 362
A log alert returns too many results and fires on ordinary activity. What should be refined?
Alert aggregation window, evaluation frequency and threshold
A scheduled log query alert using KQL
The KQL filter conditions and alert evaluation criteria
An Azure Monitor action group containing the desired notification actions
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:
Narrower query predicates prevent ordinary events from matching a security or operations alert. The relevant situation is that a log alert returns too many results and fires on ordinary activity. Metrics, logs, alerting and Network Watcher diagnostics observe different resource or flow evidence. “Alert aggregation window, evaluation frequency and threshold” does not settle this requirement: alert sensitivity depends on its time window and aggregation, not only the metric name. “A scheduled log query alert using KQL” does not settle this requirement: log alerts evaluate query results rather than fixed platform metric thresholds. Check the selected observation, monitoring scope, timing and alert or diagnostic results.
Incorrect Answers
A:
alert sensitivity depends on its time window and aggregation, not only the metric name. In this case, a log alert returns too many results and fires on ordinary activity. “Alert aggregation window, evaluation frequency and threshold” would not satisfy that requirement; the supported action is “The KQL filter conditions and alert evaluation criteria”. Narrower query predicates prevent ordinary events from matching a security or operations alert.
B:
log alerts evaluate query results rather than fixed platform metric thresholds. In this case, a log alert returns too many results and fires on ordinary activity. “A scheduled log query alert using KQL” would not satisfy that requirement; the supported action is “The KQL filter conditions and alert evaluation criteria”. Narrower query predicates prevent ordinary events from matching a security or operations alert.
D:
action groups define reusable receivers/actions invoked by alert rules. In this case, a log alert returns too many results and fires on ordinary activity. “An Azure Monitor action group containing the desired notification actions” would not satisfy that requirement; the supported action is “The KQL filter conditions and alert evaluation criteria”. Narrower query predicates prevent ordinary events from matching a security or operations alert.
Question 363
A storage outage should notify two groups through different channels. What design helps?
An Azure Monitor action group containing the desired notification actions
The action group association and its recipient configuration
Reuse an action group containing the required email/SMS/webhook receivers
An alert processing rule scoped to the affected resources and schedule
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:
Action groups centralize alert notification routing across multiple rules. The relevant situation is that a storage outage should notify two groups through different channels. Metrics, logs, alerting and Network Watcher diagnostics observe different resource or flow evidence. “An Azure Monitor action group containing the desired notification actions” does not settle this requirement: action groups define reusable receivers/actions invoked by alert rules. “The action group association and its recipient configuration” does not settle this requirement: alert evaluation and notification delivery are separate configurations. Check the selected observation, monitoring scope, timing and alert or diagnostic results.
Incorrect Answers
A:
action groups define reusable receivers/actions invoked by alert rules. In this case, a storage outage should notify two groups through different channels. “An Azure Monitor action group containing the desired notification actions” would not satisfy that requirement; the supported action is “Reuse an action group containing the required email/SMS/webhook receivers”. Action groups centralize alert notification routing across multiple rules.
B:
alert evaluation and notification delivery are separate configurations. In this case, a storage outage should notify two groups through different channels. “The action group association and its recipient configuration” would not satisfy that requirement; the supported action is “Reuse an action group containing the required email/SMS/webhook receivers”. Action groups centralize alert notification routing across multiple rules.
D:
alert processing rules can modify or suppress configured alert notification behavior without deleting the alert. In this case, a storage outage should notify two groups through different channels. “An alert processing rule scoped to the affected resources and schedule” would not satisfy that requirement; the supported action is “Reuse an action group containing the required email/SMS/webhook receivers”. Action groups centralize alert notification routing across multiple rules.
Question 364
A team needs to stop notifications from known maintenance alerts while retaining telemetry. What should they avoid?
Deleting log collection or disabling all monitoring
A scheduled log query alert using KQL
An alert processing rule scoped to the affected resources and schedule
The action group association and its recipient configuration
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:
Notification suppression should not discard the underlying metrics and logs needed for post-maintenance analysis. The relevant situation is that a team needs to stop notifications from known maintenance alerts while retaining telemetry. Metrics, logs, alerting and Network Watcher diagnostics observe different resource or flow evidence. “A scheduled log query alert using KQL” does not settle this requirement: log alerts evaluate query results rather than fixed platform metric thresholds. “An alert processing rule scoped to the affected resources and schedule” does not settle this requirement: alert processing rules can modify or suppress configured alert notification behavior without deleting the alert. Check the selected observation, monitoring scope, timing and alert or diagnostic results.
Incorrect Answers
B:
log alerts evaluate query results rather than fixed platform metric thresholds. In this case, a team needs to stop notifications from known maintenance alerts while retaining telemetry. “A scheduled log query alert using KQL” would not satisfy that requirement; the supported action is “Deleting log collection or disabling all monitoring”. Notification suppression should not discard the underlying metrics and logs needed for post-maintenance analysis.
C:
alert processing rules can modify or suppress configured alert notification behavior without deleting the alert. In this case, a team needs to stop notifications from known maintenance alerts while retaining telemetry. “An alert processing rule scoped to the affected resources and schedule” would not satisfy that requirement; the supported action is “Deleting log collection or disabling all monitoring”. Notification suppression should not discard the underlying metrics and logs needed for post-maintenance analysis.
D:
alert evaluation and notification delivery are separate configurations. In this case, a team needs to stop notifications from known maintenance alerts while retaining telemetry. “The action group association and its recipient configuration” would not satisfy that requirement; the supported action is “Deleting log collection or disabling all monitoring”. Notification suppression should not discard the underlying metrics and logs needed for post-maintenance analysis.
Question 365
An administrator wants dashboards for VM guest performance such as processes and dependencies. Which solution is relevant?
Azure Monitor storage insights or the storage account's Metrics views
Azure Monitor VM insights with the required agent configuration
Network Watcher Connection troubleshoot or Connection monitor
Connection monitor with suitable endpoints and tests
Explanation
Correct Answer
B:
VM insights adds workload-level monitoring beyond basic VM platform metrics. The relevant situation is that an administrator wants dashboards for VM guest performance such as processes and dependencies. Metrics, logs, alerting and Network Watcher diagnostics observe different resource or flow evidence. “Azure Monitor storage insights or the storage account's Metrics views” does not settle this requirement: resource insights surface relevant storage telemetry without manually assembling every chart. “Network Watcher Connection troubleshoot or Connection monitor” does not settle this requirement: connection diagnostics test reachability and help identify where a network path fails. Check the selected observation, monitoring scope, timing and alert or diagnostic results.
Incorrect Answers
A:
resource insights surface relevant storage telemetry without manually assembling every chart. In this case, an administrator wants dashboards for VM guest performance such as processes and dependencies. “Azure Monitor storage insights or the storage account's Metrics views” would not satisfy that requirement; the supported action is “Azure Monitor VM insights with the required agent configuration”. VM insights adds workload-level monitoring beyond basic VM platform metrics.
C:
connection diagnostics test reachability and help identify where a network path fails. In this case, an administrator wants dashboards for VM guest performance such as processes and dependencies. “Network Watcher Connection troubleshoot or Connection monitor” would not satisfy that requirement; the supported action is “Azure Monitor VM insights with the required agent configuration”. VM insights adds workload-level monitoring beyond basic VM platform metrics.
D:
connection monitor continuously tests and records network connectivity rather than taking one-time snapshots. In this case, an administrator wants dashboards for VM guest performance such as processes and dependencies. “Connection monitor with suitable endpoints and tests” would not satisfy that requirement; the supported action is “Azure Monitor VM insights with the required agent configuration”. VM insights adds workload-level monitoring beyond basic VM platform metrics.
Question 366
A storage team wants a resource-specific view of transaction, capacity and latency metrics. What built-in feature helps?
Azure Monitor VM insights with the required agent configuration
Connection monitor with suitable endpoints and tests
Time-aligned VM metrics, application logs and network diagnostics
Azure Monitor storage insights or the storage account's Metrics views
Explanation
Correct Answer
D:
Resource insights surface relevant storage telemetry without manually assembling every chart. The relevant situation is that a storage team wants a resource-specific view of transaction, capacity and latency metrics. Metrics, logs, alerting and Network Watcher diagnostics observe different resource or flow evidence. “Azure Monitor VM insights with the required agent configuration” does not settle this requirement: vM insights adds workload-level monitoring beyond basic VM platform metrics. “Connection monitor with suitable endpoints and tests” does not settle this requirement: connection monitor continuously tests and records network connectivity rather than taking one-time snapshots. Check the selected observation, monitoring scope, timing and alert or diagnostic results.
Incorrect Answers
A:
vM insights adds workload-level monitoring beyond basic VM platform metrics. In this case, a storage team wants a resource-specific view of transaction, capacity and latency metrics. “Azure Monitor VM insights with the required agent configuration” would not satisfy that requirement; the supported action is “Azure Monitor storage insights or the storage account's Metrics views”. Resource insights surface relevant storage telemetry without manually assembling every chart.
B:
connection monitor continuously tests and records network connectivity rather than taking one-time snapshots. In this case, a storage team wants a resource-specific view of transaction, capacity and latency metrics. “Connection monitor with suitable endpoints and tests” would not satisfy that requirement; the supported action is “Azure Monitor storage insights or the storage account's Metrics views”. Resource insights surface relevant storage telemetry without manually assembling every chart.
C:
correlating multiple signals distinguishes compute saturation from network path degradation. In this case, a storage team wants a resource-specific view of transaction, capacity and latency metrics. “Time-aligned VM metrics, application logs and network diagnostics” would not satisfy that requirement; the supported action is “Azure Monitor storage insights or the storage account's Metrics views”. Resource insights surface relevant storage telemetry without manually assembling every chart.
Question 367
A networking engineer wants to see if an NSG is denying an attempted TCP connection. Which tool can help?
Network Watcher IP flow verify on the target interface
Network Watcher Connection troubleshoot or Connection monitor
Network Watcher next hop or NIC effective routes
Time-aligned VM metrics, application logs and network diagnostics
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:
IP flow verify evaluates whether an applicable NSG security rule permits or denies an example flow. The relevant situation is that a networking engineer wants to see if an NSG is denying an attempted TCP connection. Metrics, logs, alerting and Network Watcher diagnostics observe different resource or flow evidence. “Network Watcher Connection troubleshoot or Connection monitor” does not settle this requirement: connection diagnostics test reachability and help identify where a network path fails. “Network Watcher next hop or NIC effective routes” does not settle this requirement: route diagnostics expose the next hop Azure selects for a destination. Check the selected observation, monitoring scope, timing and alert or diagnostic results.
Incorrect Answers
B:
connection diagnostics test reachability and help identify where a network path fails. In this case, a networking engineer wants to see if an NSG is denying an attempted TCP connection. “Network Watcher Connection troubleshoot or Connection monitor” would not satisfy that requirement; the supported action is “Network Watcher IP flow verify on the target interface”. IP flow verify evaluates whether an applicable NSG security rule permits or denies an example flow.
C:
route diagnostics expose the next hop Azure selects for a destination. In this case, a networking engineer wants to see if an NSG is denying an attempted TCP connection. “Network Watcher next hop or NIC effective routes” would not satisfy that requirement; the supported action is “Network Watcher IP flow verify on the target interface”. IP flow verify evaluates whether an applicable NSG security rule permits or denies an example flow.
D:
correlating multiple signals distinguishes compute saturation from network path degradation. In this case, a networking engineer wants to see if an NSG is denying an attempted TCP connection. “Time-aligned VM metrics, application logs and network diagnostics” would not satisfy that requirement; the supported action is “Network Watcher IP flow verify on the target interface”. IP flow verify evaluates whether an applicable NSG security rule permits or denies an example flow.
Question 368
A VM cannot contact its internal API. Network Watcher reports the NSG flow is allowed, but responders need packet-level evidence showing whether TCP SYNs leave the VM and whether replies return. Which supported diagnostic approach best fits?
Inspect Network Watcher effective NSG rules only and assume this proves TCP response packets were received
Read the connection monitor availability summary but do not inspect the actual packet flow
Run a next-hop route lookup but do not capture or inspect the actual SYN/ACK exchange
Use Network Watcher packet capture with appropriate scope and authorization, then inspect the resulting packets
Explanation
Correct Answer
D:
Network Watcher packet capture can collect traffic on a supported Azure VM so an administrator can inspect handshake packets and distinguish unanswered SYNs, resets, or other path behavior. Because effective NSG permission alone does not prove full end-to-end transport success, packet evidence is a different diagnostic layer from a reachability summary. The relevant situation is that a VM cannot contact its internal API. Network Watcher reports the NSG flow is allowed, but responders need packet-level evidence showing whether TCP SYNs leave the VM and whether replies return. Metrics, logs, alerting and Network Watcher diagnostics observe different resource or flow evidence. “Inspect Network Watcher effective NSG rules only and assume this proves TCP response packets were received” does not settle this requirement: A permit or route decision alone cannot prove the requested packet-level TCP handshake evidence. Check the selected observation, monitoring scope, timing and alert or diagnostic results.
Incorrect Answers
A:
A permit or route decision alone cannot prove the requested packet-level TCP handshake evidence. In this case, a VM cannot contact its internal API. Network Watcher reports the NSG flow is allowed, but responders need packet-level evidence showing whether TCP SYNs leave the VM and whether replies return. “Inspect Network Watcher effective NSG rules only and assume this proves TCP response packets were received” would not satisfy that requirement; the supported action is “Use Network Watcher packet capture with appropriate scope and authorization, then inspect the resulting packets”.
B:
Connection monitoring summarizes reachability and performance but does not replace the requested packet-level SYN and response evidence. In this case, a VM cannot contact its internal API. Network Watcher reports the NSG flow is allowed, but responders need packet-level evidence showing whether TCP SYNs leave the VM and whether replies return. “Read the connection monitor availability summary but do not inspect the actual packet flow” would not satisfy that requirement; the supported action is “Use Network Watcher packet capture with appropriate scope and authorization, then inspect the resulting packets”.
C:
A permit or route decision alone cannot prove the requested packet-level TCP handshake evidence. In this case, a VM cannot contact its internal API. Network Watcher reports the NSG flow is allowed, but responders need packet-level evidence showing whether TCP SYNs leave the VM and whether replies return. “Run a next-hop route lookup but do not capture or inspect the actual SYN/ACK exchange” would not satisfy that requirement; the supported action is “Use Network Watcher packet capture with appropriate scope and authorization, then inspect the resulting packets”.
Question 369
A network team uses BGP-propagated routes from a VPN gateway alongside user-defined routes. An Azure subnet must forward a particular on-premises prefix to a selected network virtual appliance instead of following the advertised gateway path. What configuration should be evaluated?
Change an Azure Blob lifecycle rule to create a private path for the prefix
Use VM boot diagnostics to modify BGP routing automatically
Enable an NSG inbound rule and assume it overrides next-hop route selection
Associate a user-defined route for the prefix with the required next hop, then verify effective routing
Explanation
Correct Answer
D:
Azure user-defined routes can override routes propagated through a gateway for an applicable prefix, subject to route specificity and supported routing behavior. The administrator should configure the appropriate next-hop type and subnet association, then inspect effective routes and reachability. Security rules govern filtering, not which gateway receives the traffic. In this scenario, the correct choice is “Associate a user-defined route for the prefix with the required next hop, then verify effective routing”. Confirm the agent, diagnostic data source, endpoint or network topology and collected observations before declaring success. “Change an Azure Blob lifecycle rule to create a private path for the prefix” is not equivalent: Blob lifecycle policies change object tiers or deletion, not VNet route selection. “Use VM boot diagnostics to modify BGP routing automatically” is not equivalent: VM boot diagnostics captures startup information but does not change route tables or BGP propagation.
Incorrect Answers
A:
Blob lifecycle policies change object tiers or deletion, not VNet route selection. The competing choice “Change an Azure Blob lifecycle rule to create a private path for the prefix” does not meet the specific requirement: A network team uses BGP-propagated routes from a VPN gateway alongside user-defined routes. An Azure subnet must forward a particular on-premises prefix to a selected network virtual appliance instead of following the advertised gateway path. What configuration should be evaluated. The supported action is “Associate a user-defined route for the prefix with the required next hop, then verify effective routing”.
B:
VM boot diagnostics captures startup information but does not change route tables or BGP propagation. The competing choice “Use VM boot diagnostics to modify BGP routing automatically” does not meet the specific requirement: A network team uses BGP-propagated routes from a VPN gateway alongside user-defined routes. An Azure subnet must forward a particular on-premises prefix to a selected network virtual appliance instead of following the advertised gateway path. What configuration should be evaluated. The supported action is “Associate a user-defined route for the prefix with the required next hop, then verify effective routing”.
C:
NSG allow rules permit or deny packets; they do not choose the next hop for an on-premises destination. The competing choice “Enable an NSG inbound rule and assume it overrides next-hop route selection” does not meet the specific requirement: A network team uses BGP-propagated routes from a VPN gateway alongside user-defined routes. An Azure subnet must forward a particular on-premises prefix to a selected network virtual appliance instead of following the advertised gateway path. What configuration should be evaluated. The supported action is “Associate a user-defined route for the prefix with the required next hop, then verify effective routing”.
Question 370
A service owner needs ongoing network connection availability measurements between two endpoints. Which feature fits?
Network Watcher Connection troubleshoot or Connection monitor
Connection monitor with suitable endpoints and tests
Azure Monitor storage insights or the storage account's Metrics views
Network Watcher IP flow verify on the target interface
Explanation
Correct Answer
B:
Connection monitor continuously tests and records network connectivity rather than taking one-time snapshots. The relevant situation is that a service owner needs ongoing network connection availability measurements between two endpoints. Metrics, logs, alerting and Network Watcher diagnostics observe different resource or flow evidence. “Network Watcher Connection troubleshoot or Connection monitor” does not settle this requirement: connection diagnostics test reachability and help identify where a network path fails. “Azure Monitor storage insights or the storage account's Metrics views” does not settle this requirement: resource insights surface relevant storage telemetry without manually assembling every chart. Check the selected observation, monitoring scope, timing and alert or diagnostic results.
Incorrect Answers
A:
connection diagnostics test reachability and help identify where a network path fails. In this case, a service owner needs ongoing network connection availability measurements between two endpoints. “Network Watcher Connection troubleshoot or Connection monitor” would not satisfy that requirement; the supported action is “Connection monitor with suitable endpoints and tests”. Connection monitor continuously tests and records network connectivity rather than taking one-time snapshots.
C:
resource insights surface relevant storage telemetry without manually assembling every chart. In this case, a service owner needs ongoing network connection availability measurements between two endpoints. “Azure Monitor storage insights or the storage account's Metrics views” would not satisfy that requirement; the supported action is “Connection monitor with suitable endpoints and tests”. Connection monitor continuously tests and records network connectivity rather than taking one-time snapshots.
D:
iP flow verify evaluates whether an applicable NSG security rule permits or denies an example flow. In this case, a service owner needs ongoing network connection availability measurements between two endpoints. “Network Watcher IP flow verify on the target interface” would not satisfy that requirement; the supported action is “Connection monitor with suitable endpoints and tests”. Connection monitor continuously tests and records network connectivity rather than taking one-time snapshots.
Microsoft Azure Administrator (AZ-104) Practice Tests
Our team works hard to provide students with high exam practice test questions and compelling learning experiences. We're confident of the quality level of the products we offer and provide no hassle satisfaction guarantee.
Why choose Exam-Labs?613,662+Satisfied Customers since 2015
100% Latest Exam Questions
Accurate & Updated Answers
Regular Free Updates
24/7 Customer Support
Instant Download
Exam Info
Microsoft Azure AZ-104 Practice Test Questions, Microsoft Azure AZ-104 Exam Practice Test Questions
Looking to pass your tests the first time. You can study with Microsoft Azure AZ-104 certification practice test questions and answers, study guide, training courses. With Exam-Labs VCE files you can prepare with Microsoft AZ-104 Microsoft Azure Administrator exam practice test questions and answers. The most complete solution for passing with Microsoft certification Azure AZ-104 exam practice test questions and answers, study guide, training course.
Microsoft AZ-104: Azure Administrator
Microsoft exam AZ-104, Microsoft Azure Administrator, is current as of October 1, 2026 and remains the core associate-level exam for administrators who implement, manage, and monitor Azure environments. Microsoft’s current blueprint, updated April 17, 2026, covers identities and governance, storage, compute, virtual networking, and monitoring. The associated Azure Administrator Associate credential is also an important prerequisite relationship for higher-level architecture work.
AZ-104 is broad because an Azure administrator rarely owns only one service. Real administration crosses Microsoft Entra ID, subscriptions, policy, storage, virtual machines, containers, App Service, networking, backup, monitoring, and automation. Candidates therefore need operational judgment: what to configure, where to apply it, how scope changes behavior, and how to troubleshoot when several Azure layers interact.
The exam also connects naturally to other roles. Networking specialists can deepen the virtual-networking material through AZ-700, while candidates moving toward architecture pair administrator experience with AZ-305. Across Microsoft certifications, AZ-104 is a practical administration foundation for roles that later specialize in networking, architecture, security, or other Azure disciplines.
Identity and governance determine who can change Azure and where those changes apply
Administrators should be comfortable with Microsoft Entra users and groups, external identities, licenses, self-service password reset, Azure roles, scopes, subscriptions, management groups, resource groups, tags, locks, budgets, and Azure Policy. These topics are related because access and governance become meaningful only when the candidate understands Azure’s hierarchy.
Azure role-based access control is especially important. A role definition describes permitted actions, while an assignment connects a security principal to that role at a scope. Exam scenarios often depend on inheritance, least privilege, and the difference between controlling Azure resources and managing identities themselves.
Storage questions are usually about access, resilience, lifecycle, and cost together
The blueprint includes storage accounts, redundancy, encryption, network restrictions, shared access signatures, stored access policies, access keys, identity-based access, Azure Files, Blob Storage, snapshots, soft delete, versioning, lifecycle rules, Azure Storage Explorer, and AzCopy. Rather than memorizing these as separate facts, candidates should understand the data-protection and access story they create.
Azure Blob Storage becomes easier to reason about when every scenario is reduced to who needs access, from where, for how long, with what recovery requirement, and at what expected access frequency. The correct combination of tiering, network controls, identity, redundancy, and retention follows from those constraints.
Compute administration now spans VMs, scale, containers, and App Service
AZ-104 still expects strong virtual-machine administration, including sizing, disks, availability options, movement, encryption, and scale sets. It also covers Azure Container Registry, Container Instances, Container Apps, and App Service configuration. This mix reflects the reality that administrators support both traditional server workloads and managed application platforms.
Infrastructure automation is part of that responsibility. Candidates should be able to interpret and modify ARM templates or Bicep files and use them to deploy repeatable resources. The goal is not to become a full-time infrastructure-as-code developer, but to understand declarative deployment well enough to avoid treating the portal as the only administrative interface.
Virtual networking requires understanding traffic flow rather than memorizing settings
Virtual networks, subnets, peering, public IP addresses, routes, network security groups, application security groups, Bastion, service endpoints, private endpoints, DNS, and connectivity troubleshooting form one system. A strong candidate can trace a packet mentally: name resolution, route selection, filtering, endpoint type, and destination reachability.
Azure DNS is one part of that path, while deeper network design belongs to AZ-700. For AZ-104, administrators should be able to identify whether a failure is caused by DNS, routing, NSG rules, peering, endpoint configuration, or the workload itself before changing settings at random.
Monitoring becomes useful only when signals lead to an operational response
Azure Monitor, metrics, logs, alerts, action groups, Log Analytics, Network Watcher, and Advisor help administrators detect and diagnose problems. The Azure logging and monitoring concepts are easier to retain when tied to a question: what signal would show that the service is failing, who should receive it, and what context is needed to act?
Exam scenarios may distinguish platform metrics from queryable log data or ask which tool supports a particular troubleshooting need. Hands-on practice should include creating an alert, querying logs, reviewing resource health, and using diagnostic tools during a deliberately introduced failure. Operational familiarity makes the wording of monitoring questions much less abstract.
Backup and recovery should be planned as service objectives
Administrators need to know how Azure Backup and Site Recovery fit business continuity without assuming they solve the same problem. Backup protects recoverable data and restore points, while replication and failover address workload continuity across locations. Recovery requirements should be expressed through acceptable data loss, acceptable downtime, retention, and testing.
These decisions connect to architecture because availability zones, redundancy, backup, replication, and application-level design can overlap. An AZ-104 candidate should be able to identify the administrative control needed for the stated requirement while recognizing when a broader architecture decision belongs to a solutions architect.
Cost and governance are operational concerns, not finance-only topics
Budgets, cost alerts, Advisor recommendations, tags, policy, and resource organization affect whether an Azure environment remains manageable as it grows. The subscription and management hierarchy provides the structure for applying controls consistently across teams and environments.
A useful lab is to design a small organization with management groups, subscriptions, resource groups, RBAC assignments, tags, a policy, and a budget. Then explain why each control is placed at its chosen scope. That exercise combines several AZ-104 domains and reinforces the idea that governance is about repeatable operational boundaries rather than isolated settings.
Effective AZ-104 preparation alternates configuration with troubleshooting
Reading a study guide is not enough because many objectives are procedural. Build a small environment, configure identities and storage, deploy a VM and an App Service, establish networking, enable monitoring, and deliberately break selected configurations. Troubleshooting the resulting symptoms forces candidates to understand dependencies rather than simply remember where options appear in the portal.
AZ-104 remains valuable because it teaches the operating layer that other Azure roles depend on. Architects need administrators who can implement designs, network engineers rely on correctly managed resource infrastructure, security engineers depend on sound identity and governance, and DevOps teams need stable subscriptions and services. Treat the exam as an operational systems test and the breadth becomes coherent.
Microsoft Entra and Azure authorization deserve separate mental models. Entra roles govern identity-directory functions, while Azure RBAC controls management of Azure resources. Confusing the two can lead to exam mistakes and real privilege problems. A user might be able to manage a resource group without being able to administer directory users, or manage identities without having rights to modify a virtual network. Always identify the control plane before choosing a role.
Resource locks and policy also solve different governance problems. A lock can prevent deletion or modification at a scope, while Azure Policy evaluates or enforces whether resources comply with organizational rules. Tags help with classification and cost management but are not security boundaries. Designing a lab that uses all three makes their purposes clearer than memorizing definitions because the learner can observe what each mechanism blocks, audits, or labels.
Storage security becomes easier when candidates separate authentication from authorization and network reachability. A request can fail because the caller has no credential, because the credential lacks data-plane permissions, because the storage firewall blocks the source, or because the requested object no longer exists. Shared access signatures add another dimension because scope and expiry are encoded into delegated access. Troubleshooting should determine which layer rejected the request before regenerating keys or opening networks.
For compute, administrators should practice both lifecycle operations and configuration drift. Creating a VM is only the beginning; real work includes resizing, disk changes, extension management, availability placement, backup, monitoring, and safe movement across resource groups or subscriptions. Container and App Service workloads have different lifecycle controls, so the exam rewards candidates who know when infrastructure management ends and platform management begins.
Networking labs should include effective-security-rule and effective-route inspection. These tools reveal the combined result of configuration applied at several scopes, which is often more useful than reading one NSG or route table in isolation. Add Bastion or a private endpoint and the environment becomes a realistic troubleshooting exercise where identity, DNS, network security, and service configuration all have to align.
Administrators should also build a habit of using Azure CLI or PowerShell for repeatable inspection. The exam may not ask for long scripts, but operational work benefits from commands that list resources, query configuration, or apply consistent changes across many objects. Pair those tools with Bicep for declarative deployment and the candidate gains a more realistic administrative toolkit than a portal-only study plan can provide.
Recovery drills are valuable because backup configuration can look healthy until someone needs a restore. Create a small protected workload, generate restore points, recover data or a VM, and verify access after restoration. This reveals dependencies such as network configuration, identity, DNS, and application state that may not be obvious from the backup job alone. Administrators should learn to distinguish successful backup completion from successful business recovery.
Resource movement and lifecycle questions also reward awareness of dependencies. Moving resources between groups, subscriptions, or regions may affect IDs, permissions, locks, networking, or service-specific limitations. Before changing location or ownership boundaries, inspect dependent resources and role assignments. This is a useful administrative habit because Azure environments evolve continuously; clean day-one design does not prevent later reorganizations.
A useful final exercise is to write a runbook for one Azure service from provisioning through retirement. Include identity, networking, backup, monitoring, cost controls, routine maintenance, and decommissioning. This exposes operational gaps that a one-time deployment lab misses and reinforces the administrator mindset behind AZ-104.
Use Microsoft Azure AZ-104 certification exam practice test questions, study guide and training course - the complete package at discounted price. Pass with AZ-104 Microsoft Azure Administrator practice test questions and answers, study guide, complete training course especially formatted in VCE files. Latest Microsoft certification Azure AZ-104 exam practice test questions and answers will guarantee your success without studying for endless hours.
FAQs
Microsoft Azure AZ-104 Exam Practice Test Questions, Microsoft Azure AZ-104 Practice Test Questions and Answers
Do you have questions about our AZ-104 Microsoft Azure Administrator practice test questions and answers or any of our products? If you are not clear about our Microsoft Azure AZ-104 exam practice test questions, you can read the FAQ below.
The AZ-104 Premium File has been developed by industry professionals, who have been working with IT certifications for years and have close ties with IT certification vendors and holders - with most recent exam questions and valid answers.
AZ-104 Premium File is presented in VCE format. VCE (Virtual CertExam) is a file format that realistically simulates AZ-104 exam environment, allowing for the most convenient exam preparation you can get - in the convenience of your own home or on the go. If you have ever seen IT exam simulations, chances are, they were in the VCE format.
What is VCE?
VCE is a file format associated with Visual CertExam Software. This format and software are widely used for creating tests for IT certifications. To create and open VCE files, you will need to purchase, download and install VCE Exam Simulator on your computer.
Can I try it for free?
Yes, you can. Look through free VCE files section and download any file you choose absolutely free.
Where do I get VCE Exam Simulator?
VCE Exam Simulator can be purchased from its developer, https://www.avanset.com. Please note that Exam-Labs does not sell or support this software. Should you have any questions or concerns about using this product, please contact Avanset support team directly.
How are Premium VCE files different from Free VCE files?
Premium VCE files have been developed by industry professionals, who have been working with IT certifications for years and have close ties with IT certification vendors and holders - with most recent exam questions and some insider information.
Free VCE files All files are sent by Exam-labs community members. We encourage everyone who has recently taken an exam and/or has come across some braindumps that have turned out to be true to share this information with the community by creating and sending VCE files. We don't say that these free VCEs sent by our members aren't reliable (experience shows that they are). But you should use your critical thinking as to what you download and memorize.
How long will I receive updates for AZ-104 Premium VCE File that I purchased?
Free updates are available during 30 days after you purchased Premium VCE file. After 30 days the file will become unavailable.
How can I get the products after purchase?
All products are available for download immediately from your Member's Area. Once you have made the payment, you will be transferred to Member's Area where you can login and download the products you have purchased to your PC or another device.
Will I be able to renew my products when they expire?
Yes, when the 30 days of your product validity are over, you have the option of renewing your expired products with a 30% discount. This can be done in your Member's Area.
Please note that you will not be able to use the product after it has expired if you don't renew it.
How often are the questions updated?
We always try to provide the latest pool of questions, Updates in the questions depend on the changes in actual pool of questions by different vendors. As soon as we know about the change in the exam question pool we try our best to update the products as fast as possible.
What is a Study Guide?
Study Guides available on Exam-Labs are built by industry professionals who have been working with IT certifications for years. Study Guides offer full coverage on exam objectives in a systematic approach. Study Guides are very useful for fresh applicants and provides background knowledge about preparation of exams.
How can I open a Study Guide?
Any study guide can be opened by an official Acrobat by Adobe or any other reader application you use.
What is a Training Course?
Training Courses we offer on Exam-Labs in video format are created and managed by IT professionals. The foundation of each course are its lectures, which can include videos, slides and text. In addition, authors can add resources and various types of practice activities, as a way to enhance the learning experience of students.
Enter Your Email Address to Proceed
Please fill out your email address below in order to purchase Certification/Exam.
Enter Your Email Address to Proceed
Please fill out your email address below in order to purchase Demo.
Still Not Convinced?
Download 11 Sample Questions that you Will see in your Microsoft AZ-104 exam.
