Pass ISC CISSP Exam in First Attempt Easily

Latest ISC CISSP Practice Test Questions, Exam Dumps
Accurate & Verified Answers As Experienced in the Actual Test!

You save
$39.99
Save
Verified by experts
CISSP Premium Bundle
Exam Code: CISSP
Exam Name: Certified Information Systems Security Professional
Certification Provider: ISC
Bundle includes 3 products: Premium File, Training Course, Study Guide
accept downloads in the last 7 days
CISSP Premium Bundle
  • Premium File 484 Questions & Answers
    Last Update: Oct 31, 2026
  • Training Course 62 Lectures
  • Study Guide 2003 Pages

Certified Information Systems Security Professional CISSP Practice Test 69

Question 680

A managed service promises encryption but cannot document key custody. After implementing a remedy, which acceptance-test evidence MOST directly demonstrates that the specific issue has been addressed?

  1. Review a generic encryption brochure without contractual key custody and exit evidence
  2. Confirm a padlock appears in the browser without reviewing at-rest key ownership
  3. Verify network TLS but not backup keys, rotation or restoration rights
  4. Review verifiable key management and recovery procedures

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Marketing language does not specify shared responsibility. The result of the remedy is checked directly: Review verifiable key management and recovery procedures.

Incorrect Answers

A:

“Review a generic encryption brochure without contractual key custody and exit evidence” evaluates something other than the specified fix. The meaningful evidence is “Review verifiable key management and recovery procedures”, reflecting the requirement that marketing language does not specify shared responsibility.

B:

“Confirm a padlock appears in the browser without reviewing at-rest key ownership” is insufficient to demonstrate that “Assess encryption, key control and exit obligations in provider contracts” works. Marketing language does not specify shared responsibility. The decisive test is “Review verifiable key management and recovery procedures”.

C:

“Verify network TLS but not backup keys, rotation or restoration rights” evaluates something other than the specified fix. The meaningful evidence is “Review verifiable key management and recovery procedures”, reflecting the requirement that marketing language does not specify shared responsibility.

Question 681

A hardware software bundle includes unsupported embedded firmware. Which security recommendation MOST directly addresses the described risk or requirement?

  1. Perform life-cycle support and vulnerability response due diligence
  2. Buy the bundled system because the host operating system is supported despite unsupported firmware
  3. Assume network segmentation makes future embedded firmware flaws irrelevant
  4. Accept a vendor's current price concession in place of a supported vulnerability response commitment

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Supplier supportability is part of acquisition risk. A direct way to confirm the outcome is to check vendor advisories, update cadence and end-of-support commitments.

Incorrect Answers

B:

“Buy the bundled system because the host operating system is supported despite unsupported firmware” would not establish the protection described: supplier supportability is part of acquisition risk. The necessary change is “Perform life-cycle support and vulnerability response due diligence” with the verification “Check vendor advisories, update cadence and end-of-support commitments”.

C:

“Assume network segmentation makes future embedded firmware flaws irrelevant” leaves the essential control missing: supplier supportability is part of acquisition risk. The direct corrective action is “Perform life-cycle support and vulnerability response due diligence”, validated by the acceptance check “Check vendor advisories, update cadence and end-of-support commitments”.

D:

“Accept a vendor's current price concession in place of a supported vulnerability response commitment” would not establish the protection described: supplier supportability is part of acquisition risk. The necessary change is “Perform life-cycle support and vulnerability response due diligence” with the verification “Check vendor advisories, update cadence and end-of-support commitments”.

Question 682

A hardware software bundle includes unsupported embedded firmware. After implementing a remedy, which acceptance-test evidence MOST directly demonstrates that the specific issue has been addressed?

  1. Confirm the device is on a segmented VLAN but omit supplier advisory and patch support
  2. Check vendor advisories, update cadence and end-of-support commitments
  3. Verify warranty cost while ignoring firmware end-of-support and remediation availability
  4. Check only host OS patch status without examining embedded firmware lifecycle

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Supplier supportability is part of acquisition risk. The result of the remedy is checked directly: Check vendor advisories, update cadence and end-of-support commitments.

Incorrect Answers

A:

An observation of “Confirm the device is on a segmented VLAN but omit supplier advisory and patch support” would not verify the relevant control. Supplier supportability is part of acquisition risk. The necessary acceptance evidence is “Check vendor advisories, update cadence and end-of-support commitments”.

C:

An observation of “Verify warranty cost while ignoring firmware end-of-support and remediation availability” would not verify the relevant control. Supplier supportability is part of acquisition risk. The necessary acceptance evidence is “Check vendor advisories, update cadence and end-of-support commitments”.

D:

The acceptance test must demonstrate “Check vendor advisories, update cadence and end-of-support commitments” because supplier supportability is part of acquisition risk. “Check only host OS patch status without examining embedded firmware lifecycle” cannot establish that result.

Question 683

A subcontractor changes after a cloud procurement agreement is signed. Which security recommendation MOST directly addresses the described risk or requirement?

  1. Accept any replacement subprocessor without evaluating contractual notification rights
  2. Keep the original subprocessor approval indefinitely despite the provider's changed subcontractor
  3. Reassess subprocessors, data locations and notification rights
  4. Rely on a vendor announcement without checking new processing locations or customer consent duties

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Third-party risk extends through subcontracted supply chains. A direct way to confirm the outcome is to compare current provider subcontractor list with approved terms.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The proposal “Accept any replacement subprocessor without evaluating contractual notification rights” does not meet the relevant requirement because third-party risk extends through subcontracted supply chains. The matching remediation is “Reassess subprocessors, data locations and notification rights”.

B:

“Keep the original subprocessor approval indefinitely despite the provider's changed subcontractor” is not the relevant mitigation. Third-party risk extends through subcontracted supply chains. The scenario calls for “Reassess subprocessors, data locations and notification rights”; the acceptance check is “Compare current provider subcontractor list with approved terms”.

D:

“Rely on a vendor announcement without checking new processing locations or customer consent duties” is not the relevant mitigation. Third-party risk extends through subcontracted supply chains. The scenario calls for “Reassess subprocessors, data locations and notification rights”; the acceptance check is “Compare current provider subcontractor list with approved terms”.

Question 684

A subcontractor changes after a cloud procurement agreement is signed. After implementing a remedy, which acceptance-test evidence MOST directly demonstrates that the specific issue has been addressed?

  1. Confirm a replacement vendor name appears on a portal without comparing approved contractual terms
  2. Review the initial supplier assessment only and ignore the newly added subprocessor
  3. Check a notice was sent but not that data location and approval requirements were fulfilled
  4. Compare current provider subcontractor list with approved terms

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Third-party risk extends through subcontracted supply chains. The result of the remedy is checked directly: Compare current provider subcontractor list with approved terms.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Third-party risk extends through subcontracted supply chains. The proposed check, “Confirm a replacement vendor name appears on a portal without comparing approved contractual terms”, misses the relevant outcome; “Compare current provider subcontractor list with approved terms” tests whether the intended remedy worked.

B:

“Review the initial supplier assessment only and ignore the newly added subprocessor” does not show the required outcome: compare current provider subcontractor list with approved terms. That test matters because third-party risk extends through subcontracted supply chains.

C:

Third-party risk extends through subcontracted supply chains. The proposed check, “Check a notice was sent but not that data location and approval requirements were fulfilled”, misses the relevant outcome; “Compare current provider subcontractor list with approved terms” tests whether the intended remedy worked.

Question 685

An enterprise wants to terminate a critical SaaS subscription without losing records. Which security recommendation MOST directly addresses the described risk or requirement?

  1. Define exit, data portability, retention and deletion conditions up front
  2. Rely on screenshots of important records instead of testing a complete machine-readable export
  3. Trust deletion promises without contractual timing or independent confirmation
  4. Terminate the SaaS agreement before proving that records can be exported in a usable format

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Software acquisition should include a practical exit plan. A direct way to confirm the outcome is to execute a test export and verify usable data plus verified deletion obligations.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Software acquisition should include a practical exit plan. “Rely on screenshots of important records instead of testing a complete machine-readable export” does not supply that control; “Define exit, data portability, retention and deletion conditions up front” addresses the identified gap, and “Execute a test export and verify usable data plus verified deletion obligations” verifies the result.

C:

The security distinction is that software acquisition should include a practical exit plan. “Trust deletion promises without contractual timing or independent confirmation” addresses neither the required “Define exit, data portability, retention and deletion conditions up front” action nor its supporting evidence: “Execute a test export and verify usable data plus verified deletion obligations”.

D:

Software acquisition should include a practical exit plan. “Terminate the SaaS agreement before proving that records can be exported in a usable format” does not supply that control; “Define exit, data portability, retention and deletion conditions up front” addresses the identified gap, and “Execute a test export and verify usable data plus verified deletion obligations” verifies the result.

Question 686

An enterprise wants to terminate a critical SaaS subscription without losing records. After implementing a remedy, which acceptance-test evidence MOST directly demonstrates that the specific issue has been addressed?

  1. Review vendor deletion marketing statements without verifying exit and retention obligations
  2. Execute a test export and verify usable data plus verified deletion obligations
  3. Confirm the subscription was cancelled without proving full record recovery
  4. Check a sample screenshot without validating integrity and usability of exported data

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Software acquisition should include a practical exit plan. The result of the remedy is checked directly: Execute a test export and verify usable data plus verified deletion obligations.

Incorrect Answers

A:

“Review vendor deletion marketing statements without verifying exit and retention obligations” evaluates something other than the specified fix. The meaningful evidence is “Execute a test export and verify usable data plus verified deletion obligations”, reflecting the requirement that software acquisition should include a practical exit plan.

C:

“Confirm the subscription was cancelled without proving full record recovery” evaluates something other than the specified fix. The meaningful evidence is “Execute a test export and verify usable data plus verified deletion obligations”, reflecting the requirement that software acquisition should include a practical exit plan.

D:

“Check a sample screenshot without validating integrity and usability of exported data” is insufficient to demonstrate that “Define exit, data portability, retention and deletion conditions up front” works. Software acquisition should include a practical exit plan. The decisive test is “Execute a test export and verify usable data plus verified deletion obligations”.

Question 687

An API accepts object identifiers without checking ownership. Which security recommendation MOST directly addresses the described risk or requirement?

  1. Authorize the API session once but never check ownership of individual object identifiers
  2. Treat an unpredictable object identifier as sufficient access control for another user's record
  3. Enforce per-object authorization on every server-side request
  4. Filter object IDs only in the client interface while leaving server-side authorization unchanged

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Authentication does not prevent insecure direct object reference. A direct way to confirm the outcome is to try a second user's object ID with valid but unauthorized credentials.

Incorrect Answers

A:

“Authorize the API session once but never check ownership of individual object identifiers” leaves the essential control missing: authentication does not prevent insecure direct object reference. The direct corrective action is “Enforce per-object authorization on every server-side request”, validated by the acceptance check “Try a second user's object ID with valid but unauthorized credentials”.

B:

“Treat an unpredictable object identifier as sufficient access control for another user's record” would not establish the protection described: authentication does not prevent insecure direct object reference. The necessary change is “Enforce per-object authorization on every server-side request” with the verification “Try a second user's object ID with valid but unauthorized credentials”.

D:

“Filter object IDs only in the client interface while leaving server-side authorization unchanged” would not establish the protection described: authentication does not prevent insecure direct object reference. The necessary change is “Enforce per-object authorization on every server-side request” with the verification “Try a second user's object ID with valid but unauthorized credentials”.

Question 688

An API accepts object identifiers without checking ownership. After implementing a remedy, which acceptance-test evidence MOST directly demonstrates that the specific issue has been addressed?

  1. Test guessing difficulty of object IDs without requesting an unauthorized but known identifier
  2. Verify the UI hides the second user's record while the underlying API still permits access
  3. Confirm the requester successfully authenticates but skip attempts against another user's object
  4. Try a second user's object ID with valid but unauthorized credentials

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Authentication does not prevent insecure direct object reference. The result of the remedy is checked directly: Try a second user's object ID with valid but unauthorized credentials.

Incorrect Answers

A:

An observation of “Test guessing difficulty of object IDs without requesting an unauthorized but known identifier” would not verify the relevant control. Authentication does not prevent insecure direct object reference. The necessary acceptance evidence is “Try a second user's object ID with valid but unauthorized credentials”.

B:

The acceptance test must demonstrate “Try a second user's object ID with valid but unauthorized credentials” because authentication does not prevent insecure direct object reference. “Verify the UI hides the second user's record while the underlying API still permits access” cannot establish that result.

C:

An observation of “Confirm the requester successfully authenticates but skip attempts against another user's object” would not verify the relevant control. Authentication does not prevent insecure direct object reference. The necessary acceptance evidence is “Try a second user's object ID with valid but unauthorized credentials”.

Question 689

A login handler concatenates user input into a database query. Which security recommendation MOST directly addresses the described risk or requirement?

  1. Use parameterized statements and validated data types
  2. Use a database account with limited permissions but retain injectable query construction
  3. Escape quote characters in the input but continue constructing SQL through string concatenation
  4. Block a small list of SQL keywords while leaving dynamic query structure controlled by input

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Query parameters separate data from executable query structure. A direct way to confirm the outcome is to test crafted input without allowing SQL control changes.

Incorrect Answers

B:

“Use a database account with limited permissions but retain injectable query construction” is not the relevant mitigation. Query parameters separate data from executable query structure. The scenario calls for “Use parameterized statements and validated data types”; the acceptance check is “Test crafted input without allowing SQL control changes”.

C:

The proposal “Escape quote characters in the input but continue constructing SQL through string concatenation” does not meet the relevant requirement because query parameters separate data from executable query structure. The matching remediation is “Use parameterized statements and validated data types”.

D:

“Block a small list of SQL keywords while leaving dynamic query structure controlled by input” is not the relevant mitigation. Query parameters separate data from executable query structure. The scenario calls for “Use parameterized statements and validated data types”; the acceptance check is “Test crafted input without allowing SQL control changes”.

Question 690

A login handler concatenates user input into a database query. After implementing a remedy, which acceptance-test evidence MOST directly demonstrates that the specific issue has been addressed?

  1. Confirm a legitimate password logs in without submitting crafted query input
  2. Test crafted input without allowing SQL control changes
  3. Test only a banned keyword while omitting encoded or syntactically different injection attempts
  4. Review database permissions without checking whether crafted input can alter the SQL parse tree

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Query parameters separate data from executable query structure. The result of the remedy is checked directly: Test crafted input without allowing SQL control changes.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Query parameters separate data from executable query structure. The proposed check, “Confirm a legitimate password logs in without submitting crafted query input”, misses the relevant outcome; “Test crafted input without allowing SQL control changes” tests whether the intended remedy worked.

C:

Query parameters separate data from executable query structure. The proposed check, “Test only a banned keyword while omitting encoded or syntactically different injection attempts”, misses the relevant outcome; “Test crafted input without allowing SQL control changes” tests whether the intended remedy worked.

D:

“Review database permissions without checking whether crafted input can alter the SQL parse tree” does not show the required outcome: test crafted input without allowing SQL control changes. That test matters because query parameters separate data from executable query structure.

Certified Information Systems Security Professional (CISSP) Practice Tests

Purchase ISC CISSP Exam Training Products Individually

CISSP Questions & Answers
Premium File
484 Questions & Answers
Last Update: Oct 31, 2026
$59.99
CISSP Training Course
62 Lectures
$24.99
CISSP Study Guide
Study Guide
2003 Pages
$24.99
accept downloads in the last 7 days
What exactly is CISSP Premium File?

The CISSP Premium File has been developed by industry professionals, who have been working with IT certifications for years and have close ties with IT certification vendors and holders - with most recent exam questions and valid answers.

CISSP Premium File is presented in VCE format. VCE (Virtual CertExam) is a file format that realistically simulates CISSP exam environment, allowing for the most convenient exam preparation you can get - in the convenience of your own home or on the go. If you have ever seen IT exam simulations, chances are, they were in the VCE format.

What is VCE?

VCE is a file format associated with Visual CertExam Software. This format and software are widely used for creating tests for IT certifications. To create and open VCE files, you will need to purchase, download and install VCE Exam Simulator on your computer.

Can I try it for free?

Yes, you can. Look through free VCE files section and download any file you choose absolutely free.

Where do I get VCE Exam Simulator?

VCE Exam Simulator can be purchased from its developer, https://www.avanset.com. Please note that Exam-Labs does not sell or support this software. Should you have any questions or concerns about using this product, please contact Avanset support team directly.

How are Premium VCE files different from Free VCE files?

Premium VCE files have been developed by industry professionals, who have been working with IT certifications for years and have close ties with IT certification vendors and holders - with most recent exam questions and some insider information.

Free VCE files All files are sent by Exam-labs community members. We encourage everyone who has recently taken an exam and/or has come across some braindumps that have turned out to be true to share this information with the community by creating and sending VCE files. We don't say that these free VCEs sent by our members aren't reliable (experience shows that they are). But you should use your critical thinking as to what you download and memorize.

How long will I receive updates for CISSP Premium VCE File that I purchased?

Free updates are available during 30 days after you purchased Premium VCE file. After 30 days the file will become unavailable.

How can I get the products after purchase?

All products are available for download immediately from your Member's Area. Once you have made the payment, you will be transferred to Member's Area where you can login and download the products you have purchased to your PC or another device.

Will I be able to renew my products when they expire?

Yes, when the 30 days of your product validity are over, you have the option of renewing your expired products with a 30% discount. This can be done in your Member's Area.

Please note that you will not be able to use the product after it has expired if you don't renew it.

How often are the questions updated?

We always try to provide the latest pool of questions, Updates in the questions depend on the changes in actual pool of questions by different vendors. As soon as we know about the change in the exam question pool we try our best to update the products as fast as possible.

What is a Study Guide?

Study Guides available on Exam-Labs are built by industry professionals who have been working with IT certifications for years. Study Guides offer full coverage on exam objectives in a systematic approach. Study Guides are very useful for fresh applicants and provides background knowledge about preparation of exams.

How can I open a Study Guide?

Any study guide can be opened by an official Acrobat by Adobe or any other reader application you use.

What is a Training Course?

Training Courses we offer on Exam-Labs in video format are created and managed by IT professionals. The foundation of each course are its lectures, which can include videos, slides and text. In addition, authors can add resources and various types of practice activities, as a way to enhance the learning experience of students.

Enter Your Email Address to Proceed

Please fill out your email address below in order to purchase Certification/Exam.

A confirmation link will be sent to this email address to verify your login.

Make sure to enter correct email address.

Enter Your Email Address to Proceed

Please fill out your email address below in order to purchase Demo.

A confirmation link will be sent to this email address to verify your login.

Make sure to enter correct email address.

Still Not Convinced?

Download 20 Sample Questions that you Will see in your
ISC CISSP exam.

Download 20 Free Questions

or Guarantee your success by buying the full version which covers
the full latest pool of questions. (484 Questions, Last Updated on
Oct 31, 2026)

How It Works

Download Exam
Step 1. Choose Exam
on Exam-Labs
Download IT Exams Questions & Answers
Download Avanset Simulator
Step 2. Open Exam with
Avanset Exam Simulator
Press here to download VCE Exam Simulator that simulates latest exam environment
Study
Step 3. Study
& Pass
IT Exams Anywhere, Anytime!

SPECIAL OFFER: GET 10% OFF. This is ONE TIME OFFER

You save
10%
Save
Exam-Labs Special Discount

Enter Your Email Address to Receive Your 10% Off Discount Code

A confirmation link will be sent to this email address to verify your login

* We value your privacy. We will not rent or sell your email address.

SPECIAL OFFER: GET 10% OFF

You save
10%
Save
Exam-Labs Special Discount

USE DISCOUNT CODE:

A confirmation link was sent to your email.

Please check your mailbox for a message from [email protected] and follow the directions.