Pass ISC CISSP Exam in First Attempt Easily

Latest ISC CISSP Practice Test Questions, Exam Dumps
Accurate & Verified Answers As Experienced in the Actual Test!

You save
$39.99
Save
Verified by experts
CISSP Premium Bundle
Exam Code: CISSP
Exam Name: Certified Information Systems Security Professional
Certification Provider: ISC
Bundle includes 3 products: Premium File, Training Course, Study Guide
accept downloads in the last 7 days
CISSP Premium Bundle
  • Premium File 484 Questions & Answers
    Last Update: Oct 31, 2026
  • Training Course 62 Lectures
  • Study Guide 2003 Pages

Certified Information Systems Security Professional CISSP Practice Test 30

Question 290

A company interconnects subsidiaries with different routing and security domains. Which security recommendation MOST directly addresses the described risk or requirement?

  1. Accept route imports from every subsidiary without prefix filtering or policy review
  2. Separate route exchange using controlled VRFs and scoped policy
  3. Exchange all subsidiary routes globally and depend on firewall rules to isolate conflicting tenants
  4. Assign different VLAN names but leak overlapping address prefixes between routing domains

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

VRF separation is about routing tables, not merely port tagging. A direct way to confirm the outcome is to review route-leak tests and allowed cross-domain prefixes.

Incorrect Answers

A:

“Accept route imports from every subsidiary without prefix filtering or policy review” is not the relevant mitigation. VRF separation is about routing tables, not merely port tagging. The scenario calls for “Separate route exchange using controlled VRFs and scoped policy”; the acceptance check is “Review route-leak tests and allowed cross-domain prefixes”.

C:

“Exchange all subsidiary routes globally and depend on firewall rules to isolate conflicting tenants” is not the relevant mitigation. VRF separation is about routing tables, not merely port tagging. The scenario calls for “Separate route exchange using controlled VRFs and scoped policy”; the acceptance check is “Review route-leak tests and allowed cross-domain prefixes”.

D:

The proposal “Assign different VLAN names but leak overlapping address prefixes between routing domains” does not meet the relevant requirement because VRF separation is about routing tables, not merely port tagging. The matching remediation is “Separate route exchange using controlled VRFs and scoped policy”.

Question 291

A company interconnects subsidiaries with different routing and security domains. After implementing a remedy, which acceptance-test evidence MOST directly demonstrates that the specific issue has been addressed?

  1. Confirm border peers are up but not which subsidiary routes have leaked across VRFs
  2. Review a summary route table without probing prohibited cross-domain prefixes
  3. Review route-leak tests and allowed cross-domain prefixes
  4. Check each tenant's local VLAN assignment while unwanted intercompany route exchange persists

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

VRF separation is about routing tables, not merely port tagging. The result of the remedy is checked directly: Review route-leak tests and allowed cross-domain prefixes.

Incorrect Answers

A:

“Confirm border peers are up but not which subsidiary routes have leaked across VRFs” does not show the required outcome: review route-leak tests and allowed cross-domain prefixes. That test matters because VRF separation is about routing tables, not merely port tagging.

B:

VRF separation is about routing tables, not merely port tagging. The proposed check, “Review a summary route table without probing prohibited cross-domain prefixes”, misses the relevant outcome; “Review route-leak tests and allowed cross-domain prefixes” tests whether the intended remedy worked.

D:

VRF separation is about routing tables, not merely port tagging. The proposed check, “Check each tenant's local VLAN assignment while unwanted intercompany route exchange persists”, misses the relevant outcome; “Review route-leak tests and allowed cross-domain prefixes” tests whether the intended remedy worked.

Question 292

An internal inspection appliance must observe only explicitly selected traffic. Which security recommendation MOST directly addresses the described risk or requirement?

  1. Chain every network packet through the appliance even though the design requires only selected services
  2. Insert a single inline inspection node without a failure-path or asymmetric-routing strategy
  3. Force only outbound flows through inspection while return traffic bypasses its state table
  4. Design service-chain insertion and symmetric paths with failover behavior

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Asymmetric routing can bypass stateful inspection controls. A direct way to confirm the outcome is to verify both directions traverse inspection before completing a flow.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Asymmetric routing can bypass stateful inspection controls. “Chain every network packet through the appliance even though the design requires only selected services” does not supply that control; “Design service-chain insertion and symmetric paths with failover behavior” addresses the identified gap, and “Verify both directions traverse inspection before completing a flow” verifies the result.

B:

The security distinction is that asymmetric routing can bypass stateful inspection controls. “Insert a single inline inspection node without a failure-path or asymmetric-routing strategy” addresses neither the required “Design service-chain insertion and symmetric paths with failover behavior” action nor its supporting evidence: “Verify both directions traverse inspection before completing a flow”.

C:

Asymmetric routing can bypass stateful inspection controls. “Force only outbound flows through inspection while return traffic bypasses its state table” does not supply that control; “Design service-chain insertion and symmetric paths with failover behavior” addresses the identified gap, and “Verify both directions traverse inspection before completing a flow” verifies the result.

Question 293

An internal inspection appliance must observe only explicitly selected traffic. After implementing a remedy, which acceptance-test evidence MOST directly demonstrates that the specific issue has been addressed?

  1. Verify both directions traverse inspection before completing a flow
  2. Test inspection in normal conditions only and ignore a failed appliance or alternate path
  3. Confirm the appliance receives a sample SYN but never validate reverse traffic traversal
  4. Verify a selected route appears in configuration without completing a bidirectional inspected flow

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Asymmetric routing can bypass stateful inspection controls. The result of the remedy is checked directly: Verify both directions traverse inspection before completing a flow.

Incorrect Answers

B:

“Test inspection in normal conditions only and ignore a failed appliance or alternate path” evaluates something other than the specified fix. The meaningful evidence is “Verify both directions traverse inspection before completing a flow”, reflecting the requirement that asymmetric routing can bypass stateful inspection controls.

C:

“Confirm the appliance receives a sample SYN but never validate reverse traffic traversal” is insufficient to demonstrate that “Design service-chain insertion and symmetric paths with failover behavior” works. Asymmetric routing can bypass stateful inspection controls. The decisive test is “Verify both directions traverse inspection before completing a flow”.

D:

“Verify a selected route appears in configuration without completing a bidirectional inspected flow” evaluates something other than the specified fix. The meaningful evidence is “Verify both directions traverse inspection before completing a flow”, reflecting the requirement that asymmetric routing can bypass stateful inspection controls.

Question 294

Remote offices run Wi-Fi using a shared static password across all employees. Which security recommendation MOST directly addresses the described risk or requirement?

  1. Retain the office-wide Wi-Fi password and distribute it only to recently hired employees
  2. Deploy identity-based enterprise wireless authentication and revocation
  3. Rotate the shared secret after termination but keep all users indistinguishable on the WLAN
  4. Add a captive portal banner without individual identity-based wireless authorization

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Per-user enterprise Wi-Fi access improves accountability over shared PSKs. A direct way to confirm the outcome is to remove a user and prove they no longer authenticate without rotating everyone.

Incorrect Answers

A:

“Retain the office-wide Wi-Fi password and distribute it only to recently hired employees” would not establish the protection described: per-user enterprise Wi-Fi access improves accountability over shared PSKs. The necessary change is “Deploy identity-based enterprise wireless authentication and revocation” with the verification “Remove a user and prove they no longer authenticate without rotating everyone”.

C:

“Rotate the shared secret after termination but keep all users indistinguishable on the WLAN” would not establish the protection described: per-user enterprise Wi-Fi access improves accountability over shared PSKs. The necessary change is “Deploy identity-based enterprise wireless authentication and revocation” with the verification “Remove a user and prove they no longer authenticate without rotating everyone”.

D:

“Add a captive portal banner without individual identity-based wireless authorization” leaves the essential control missing: per-user enterprise Wi-Fi access improves accountability over shared PSKs. The direct corrective action is “Deploy identity-based enterprise wireless authentication and revocation”, validated by the acceptance check “Remove a user and prove they no longer authenticate without rotating everyone”.

Question 295

Remote offices run Wi-Fi using a shared static password across all employees. After implementing a remedy, which acceptance-test evidence MOST directly demonstrates that the specific issue has been addressed?

  1. Inspect controller uptime without testing individual certificate or credential revocation
  2. Check that the password rotated once while former employee devices retain usable wireless access
  3. Remove a user and prove they no longer authenticate without rotating everyone
  4. Confirm a departing user cannot access a corporate website but not whether the shared WLAN password still works

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Per-user enterprise Wi-Fi access improves accountability over shared PSKs. The result of the remedy is checked directly: Remove a user and prove they no longer authenticate without rotating everyone.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The acceptance test must demonstrate “Remove a user and prove they no longer authenticate without rotating everyone” because per-user enterprise Wi-Fi access improves accountability over shared PSKs. “Inspect controller uptime without testing individual certificate or credential revocation” cannot establish that result.

B:

An observation of “Check that the password rotated once while former employee devices retain usable wireless access” would not verify the relevant control. Per-user enterprise Wi-Fi access improves accountability over shared PSKs. The necessary acceptance evidence is “Remove a user and prove they no longer authenticate without rotating everyone”.

D:

An observation of “Confirm a departing user cannot access a corporate website but not whether the shared WLAN password still works” would not verify the relevant control. Per-user enterprise Wi-Fi access improves accountability over shared PSKs. The necessary acceptance evidence is “Remove a user and prove they no longer authenticate without rotating everyone”.

Question 296

A Bluetooth sensor fleet pairs without authenticating device identity. Which security recommendation MOST directly addresses the described risk or requirement?

  1. Depend on obscuring the advertised device name instead of cryptographic pairing
  2. Allow Bluetooth pairing with any nearby identifier if the sensor model number looks familiar
  3. Protect the sensor's cloud API while permitting unauthenticated local Bluetooth enrollment
  4. Specify secure pairing and device enrollment for allowed sensors

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Short-range radio does not imply trusted device identity. A direct way to confirm the outcome is to attempt unauthorized pairing and validate rejection.

Incorrect Answers

A:

“Depend on obscuring the advertised device name instead of cryptographic pairing” is not the relevant mitigation. Short-range radio does not imply trusted device identity. The scenario calls for “Specify secure pairing and device enrollment for allowed sensors”; the acceptance check is “Attempt unauthorized pairing and validate rejection”.

B:

The proposal “Allow Bluetooth pairing with any nearby identifier if the sensor model number looks familiar” does not meet the relevant requirement because short-range radio does not imply trusted device identity. The matching remediation is “Specify secure pairing and device enrollment for allowed sensors”.

C:

“Protect the sensor's cloud API while permitting unauthenticated local Bluetooth enrollment” is not the relevant mitigation. Short-range radio does not imply trusted device identity. The scenario calls for “Specify secure pairing and device enrollment for allowed sensors”; the acceptance check is “Attempt unauthorized pairing and validate rejection”.

Question 297

A Bluetooth sensor fleet pairs without authenticating device identity. After implementing a remedy, which acceptance-test evidence MOST directly demonstrates that the specific issue has been addressed?

  1. Attempt unauthorized pairing and validate rejection
  2. Verify two enrolled sensors pair normally without trying an unknown replacement device
  3. Check the Bluetooth address format but not whether an unauthorized identity is refused
  4. Confirm sensor readings reach the cloud without assessing rogue local pairing attempts

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Short-range radio does not imply trusted device identity. The result of the remedy is checked directly: Attempt unauthorized pairing and validate rejection.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Short-range radio does not imply trusted device identity. The proposed check, “Verify two enrolled sensors pair normally without trying an unknown replacement device”, misses the relevant outcome; “Attempt unauthorized pairing and validate rejection” tests whether the intended remedy worked.

C:

“Check the Bluetooth address format but not whether an unauthorized identity is refused” does not show the required outcome: attempt unauthorized pairing and validate rejection. That test matters because short-range radio does not imply trusted device identity.

D:

Short-range radio does not imply trusted device identity. The proposed check, “Confirm sensor readings reach the cloud without assessing rogue local pairing attempts”, misses the relevant outcome; “Attempt unauthorized pairing and validate rejection” tests whether the intended remedy worked.

Question 298

A mobile application assumes all traffic from cellular networks is confidential. Which security recommendation MOST directly addresses the described risk or requirement?

  1. Trust a mobile device's phone number as proof of app-to-service identity
  2. Require end-to-end transport protection and robust device identity
  3. Use client-side display masking while permitting unvalidated server certificates on mobile links
  4. Assume cellular carriers encrypt traffic end to end and send sensitive API calls without TLS

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Mobile carrier transport is not an application trust boundary. A direct way to confirm the outcome is to inspect traffic from a hostile mobile access segment.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Mobile carrier transport is not an application trust boundary. “Trust a mobile device's phone number as proof of app-to-service identity” does not supply that control; “Require end-to-end transport protection and robust device identity” addresses the identified gap, and “Inspect traffic from a hostile mobile access segment” verifies the result.

C:

Mobile carrier transport is not an application trust boundary. “Use client-side display masking while permitting unvalidated server certificates on mobile links” does not supply that control; “Require end-to-end transport protection and robust device identity” addresses the identified gap, and “Inspect traffic from a hostile mobile access segment” verifies the result.

D:

The security distinction is that mobile carrier transport is not an application trust boundary. “Assume cellular carriers encrypt traffic end to end and send sensitive API calls without TLS” addresses neither the required “Require end-to-end transport protection and robust device identity” action nor its supporting evidence: “Inspect traffic from a hostile mobile access segment”.

Question 299

A mobile application assumes all traffic from cellular networks is confidential. After implementing a remedy, which acceptance-test evidence MOST directly demonstrates that the specific issue has been addressed?

  1. Review the app login screen while the device accepts a forged API endpoint
  2. Confirm the app functions on cellular data but never inspect interception from an untrusted base station
  3. Inspect traffic from a hostile mobile access segment
  4. Verify the SIM connects to a carrier without examining the application transport channel

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Mobile carrier transport is not an application trust boundary. The result of the remedy is checked directly: Inspect traffic from a hostile mobile access segment.

Incorrect Answers

A:

“Review the app login screen while the device accepts a forged API endpoint” is insufficient to demonstrate that “Require end-to-end transport protection and robust device identity” works. Mobile carrier transport is not an application trust boundary. The decisive test is “Inspect traffic from a hostile mobile access segment”.

B:

“Confirm the app functions on cellular data but never inspect interception from an untrusted base station” evaluates something other than the specified fix. The meaningful evidence is “Inspect traffic from a hostile mobile access segment”, reflecting the requirement that mobile carrier transport is not an application trust boundary.

D:

“Verify the SIM connects to a carrier without examining the application transport channel” evaluates something other than the specified fix. The meaningful evidence is “Inspect traffic from a hostile mobile access segment”, reflecting the requirement that mobile carrier transport is not an application trust boundary.

Question 300

An Internet-facing content service faces large traffic spikes from diverse regions. Which security recommendation MOST directly addresses the described risk or requirement?

  1. Open the origin server publicly and assume a CDN automatically limits direct origin traffic
  2. Increase origin CPU alone without accounting for geographically distributed traffic surges
  3. Cache sensitive user pages at the public edge without authorization or cache-key isolation
  4. Use protected CDN distribution with origin restrictions and capacity planning

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Content caching protects scalability but cannot substitute for origin authorization. A direct way to confirm the outcome is to verify client requests use the edge while origin access remains scoped.

Incorrect Answers

A:

“Open the origin server publicly and assume a CDN automatically limits direct origin traffic” would not establish the protection described: content caching protects scalability but cannot substitute for origin authorization. The necessary change is “Use protected CDN distribution with origin restrictions and capacity planning” with the verification “Verify client requests use the edge while origin access remains scoped”.

B:

“Increase origin CPU alone without accounting for geographically distributed traffic surges” leaves the essential control missing: content caching protects scalability but cannot substitute for origin authorization. The direct corrective action is “Use protected CDN distribution with origin restrictions and capacity planning”, validated by the acceptance check “Verify client requests use the edge while origin access remains scoped”.

C:

“Cache sensitive user pages at the public edge without authorization or cache-key isolation” would not establish the protection described: content caching protects scalability but cannot substitute for origin authorization. The necessary change is “Use protected CDN distribution with origin restrictions and capacity planning” with the verification “Verify client requests use the edge while origin access remains scoped”.

Certified Information Systems Security Professional (CISSP) Practice Tests

Purchase ISC CISSP Exam Training Products Individually

CISSP Questions & Answers
Premium File
484 Questions & Answers
Last Update: Oct 31, 2026
$59.99
CISSP Training Course
62 Lectures
$24.99
CISSP Study Guide
Study Guide
2003 Pages
$24.99
accept downloads in the last 7 days
What exactly is CISSP Premium File?

The CISSP Premium File has been developed by industry professionals, who have been working with IT certifications for years and have close ties with IT certification vendors and holders - with most recent exam questions and valid answers.

CISSP Premium File is presented in VCE format. VCE (Virtual CertExam) is a file format that realistically simulates CISSP exam environment, allowing for the most convenient exam preparation you can get - in the convenience of your own home or on the go. If you have ever seen IT exam simulations, chances are, they were in the VCE format.

What is VCE?

VCE is a file format associated with Visual CertExam Software. This format and software are widely used for creating tests for IT certifications. To create and open VCE files, you will need to purchase, download and install VCE Exam Simulator on your computer.

Can I try it for free?

Yes, you can. Look through free VCE files section and download any file you choose absolutely free.

Where do I get VCE Exam Simulator?

VCE Exam Simulator can be purchased from its developer, https://www.avanset.com. Please note that Exam-Labs does not sell or support this software. Should you have any questions or concerns about using this product, please contact Avanset support team directly.

How are Premium VCE files different from Free VCE files?

Premium VCE files have been developed by industry professionals, who have been working with IT certifications for years and have close ties with IT certification vendors and holders - with most recent exam questions and some insider information.

Free VCE files All files are sent by Exam-labs community members. We encourage everyone who has recently taken an exam and/or has come across some braindumps that have turned out to be true to share this information with the community by creating and sending VCE files. We don't say that these free VCEs sent by our members aren't reliable (experience shows that they are). But you should use your critical thinking as to what you download and memorize.

How long will I receive updates for CISSP Premium VCE File that I purchased?

Free updates are available during 30 days after you purchased Premium VCE file. After 30 days the file will become unavailable.

How can I get the products after purchase?

All products are available for download immediately from your Member's Area. Once you have made the payment, you will be transferred to Member's Area where you can login and download the products you have purchased to your PC or another device.

Will I be able to renew my products when they expire?

Yes, when the 30 days of your product validity are over, you have the option of renewing your expired products with a 30% discount. This can be done in your Member's Area.

Please note that you will not be able to use the product after it has expired if you don't renew it.

How often are the questions updated?

We always try to provide the latest pool of questions, Updates in the questions depend on the changes in actual pool of questions by different vendors. As soon as we know about the change in the exam question pool we try our best to update the products as fast as possible.

What is a Study Guide?

Study Guides available on Exam-Labs are built by industry professionals who have been working with IT certifications for years. Study Guides offer full coverage on exam objectives in a systematic approach. Study Guides are very useful for fresh applicants and provides background knowledge about preparation of exams.

How can I open a Study Guide?

Any study guide can be opened by an official Acrobat by Adobe or any other reader application you use.

What is a Training Course?

Training Courses we offer on Exam-Labs in video format are created and managed by IT professionals. The foundation of each course are its lectures, which can include videos, slides and text. In addition, authors can add resources and various types of practice activities, as a way to enhance the learning experience of students.

Enter Your Email Address to Proceed

Please fill out your email address below in order to purchase Certification/Exam.

A confirmation link will be sent to this email address to verify your login.

Make sure to enter correct email address.

Enter Your Email Address to Proceed

Please fill out your email address below in order to purchase Demo.

A confirmation link will be sent to this email address to verify your login.

Make sure to enter correct email address.

Still Not Convinced?

Download 20 Sample Questions that you Will see in your
ISC CISSP exam.

Download 20 Free Questions

or Guarantee your success by buying the full version which covers
the full latest pool of questions. (484 Questions, Last Updated on
Oct 31, 2026)

How It Works

Download Exam
Step 1. Choose Exam
on Exam-Labs
Download IT Exams Questions & Answers
Download Avanset Simulator
Step 2. Open Exam with
Avanset Exam Simulator
Press here to download VCE Exam Simulator that simulates latest exam environment
Study
Step 3. Study
& Pass
IT Exams Anywhere, Anytime!

SPECIAL OFFER: GET 10% OFF. This is ONE TIME OFFER

You save
10%
Save
Exam-Labs Special Discount

Enter Your Email Address to Receive Your 10% Off Discount Code

A confirmation link will be sent to this email address to verify your login

* We value your privacy. We will not rent or sell your email address.

SPECIAL OFFER: GET 10% OFF

You save
10%
Save
Exam-Labs Special Discount

USE DISCOUNT CODE:

A confirmation link was sent to your email.

Please check your mailbox for a message from [email protected] and follow the directions.