Cisco Certified Support Technician (CCST) Networking 100-150 Practice Test 64
Question 630
The local support team reports: At the fictional Rivergate Branch during its network support shift, the team observes: A technician sees that packet TTL decreases at a routed hop and calls it corruption that must be repaired by disabling routing. What is the MOST specific underlying cause?
- IPv4 routers decrement TTL to help prevent packets from looping indefinitely.
- MAC learning and aging or relearning govern how a switch updates host-to-port information.
- An SFP cage requires a compatible pluggable module before the chosen optical or copper medium can connect.
- Dedicated system, stack and port LEDs indicate different categories of information.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:Correct. This mechanism fits the observed network symptom at the fictional Rivergate Branch: IPv4 routers decrement TTL to help prevent packets from looping indefinitely. The corresponding remedy is “Interpret a TTL decrement as normal per-hop routing behavior and investigate only unexpected expiration or loops.”. Confirmation: A trace shows successive routed hops with decreasing TTL and successful destination arrival.
Incorrect Answers
B:That cause belongs to a different case: A technician moves a workstation to a different port and the switch initially sends some traffic to its old location. The observed fictional Rivergate Branch condition is specifically explained by “IPv4 routers decrement TTL to help prevent packets from looping indefinitely.”.
C:That cause belongs to a different case: A switch has a removable SFP slot and a trainee tries to plug an RJ-45 patch cord directly into the empty metal cage. The observed fictional Rivergate Branch condition is specifically explained by “IPv4 routers decrement TTL to help prevent packets from looping indefinitely.”.
D:That cause belongs to a different case: A technician photographs a stack member LED and labels it a line-rate speed indicator on a switch model with separate stacking status. The observed fictional Rivergate Branch condition is specifically explained by “IPv4 routers decrement TTL to help prevent packets from looping indefinitely.”.
Question 631
The technician must verify the following scenario: At the fictional Rivergate Branch during its network support shift, the team observes: A technician sees that packet TTL decreases at a routed hop and calls it corruption that must be repaired by disabling routing. The approved corrective action is: “Interpret a TTL decrement as normal per-hop routing behavior and investigate only unexpected expiration or loops.” Which result BEST demonstrates success?
- The physical link establishes and the port LED follows the device's documented link indication.
- The printer is reachable on the intended access VLAN without a mismatched trunk endpoint.
- A test broadcast stays inside VLAN 20 while routed services communicate as designed.
- A trace shows successive routed hops with decreasing TTL and successful destination arrival.
Explanation
Correct Answer
D:Correct. This is the required observable acceptance evidence for “Interpret a TTL decrement as normal per-hop routing behavior and investigate only unexpected expiration or loops.” at the fictional Rivergate Branch. It demonstrates correction of the original cause: IPv4 routers decrement TTL to help prevent packets from looping indefinitely.
Incorrect Answers
A:That result is evidence for a separate corrective action, “Verify cable seating, peer port status and the interface's configured state.”. It does not establish the intended outcome “A trace shows successive routed hops with decreasing TTL and successful destination arrival.” for the fictional Rivergate Branch case.
B:That result is evidence for a separate corrective action, “Attach the printer to its mapped access port and reserve the inter-switch trunk for switch uplinks.”. It does not establish the intended outcome “A trace shows successive routed hops with decreasing TTL and successful destination arrival.” for the fictional Rivergate Branch case.
C:That result is evidence for a separate corrective action, “Confirm the broadcast scope and identify the routing or relay service required for cross-VLAN needs.”. It does not establish the intended outcome “A trace shows successive routed hops with decreasing TTL and successful destination arrival.” for the fictional Rivergate Branch case.
Question 632
A change reviewer considers: At the fictional Rivergate Branch during its network support shift, the team observes: A technician sees that packet TTL decreases at a routed hop and calls it corruption that must be repaired by disabling routing. During “Interpret a TTL decrement as normal per-hop routing behavior and investigate only unexpected expiration or loops.”, which precaution MOST specifically prevents a related risk?
- Do not declare an LED fault from blinking alone without checking that model's legend.
- Do not configure learned source MAC entries as destination-only learning events.
- Do not disable legitimate routing merely because the IPv4 TTL changes at each hop.
- Do not treat an unpowered device as an IP routing problem before checking electrical supply.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:Correct. This precaution prevents a second fault while applying “Interpret a TTL decrement as normal per-hop routing behavior and investigate only unexpected expiration or loops.” at the fictional Rivergate Branch. The required protection is “Do not disable legitimate routing merely because the IPv4 TTL changes at each hop.”; success still requires “A trace shows successive routed hops with decreasing TTL and successful destination arrival.”.
Incorrect Answers
A:This caution is appropriate for a separate failure pattern: A Cisco switch port light flickers whenever a workstation transfers data and the technician interprets every blink as a hardware fault. The principal adjacent risk here is controlled by “Do not disable legitimate routing merely because the IPv4 TTL changes at each hop.”.
B:This caution is appropriate for a separate failure pattern: An access switch sees a source MAC arrive on port 5 but a trainee claims the MAC table can only learn destination MAC addresses. The principal adjacent risk here is controlled by “Do not disable legitimate routing merely because the IPv4 TTL changes at each hop.”.
D:This caution is appropriate for a separate failure pattern: A new switch has no power indicator after rack installation, but a trainee diagnoses failed IP routing before checking its supply. The principal adjacent risk here is controlled by “Do not disable legitimate routing merely because the IPv4 TTL changes at each hop.”.
Question 633
During entry-level network support, consider: At the fictional Lakebridge Travel Office before a planned system change, the team observes: A network has a redundant router and a failed primary gateway but the host points to a single unavailable default gateway IP. Which action MOST directly resolves the reported issue?
- Verify port VLAN membership and provide an authorized inter-VLAN routing path if communication is required.
- Validate the approved gateway availability mechanism and host default-gateway address.
- Configure and verify the supported VLAN trunk on the designated uplink.
- Read the device port legend and interface status to distinguish Ethernet from console service.
Explanation
Correct Answer
B:Correct. In the fictional Lakebridge Travel Office case, A host's configured next hop must remain reachable, potentially through an approved first-hop redundancy design. The specified corrective action, “Validate the approved gateway availability mechanism and host default-gateway address.”, directly targets that condition. Evidence of resolution: The host reaches off-subnet services after the documented gateway failover mechanism operates.
Incorrect Answers
A:That action addresses a different network issue: Two PCs connected to one physical switch are in separate access VLANs and cannot talk without routing, but the help desk assumes all switch ports share one broadcast domain. The present fictional Lakebridge Travel Office finding instead needs “Validate the approved gateway availability mechanism and host default-gateway address.”, verified by “The host reaches off-subnet services after the documented gateway failover mechanism operates.”.
C:That action addresses a different network issue: A switch-to-switch uplink must carry several VLANs but one port is configured as a single access VLAN. The present fictional Lakebridge Travel Office finding instead needs “Validate the approved gateway availability mechanism and host default-gateway address.”, verified by “The host reaches off-subnet services after the documented gateway failover mechanism operates.”.
D:That action addresses a different network issue: A network team labels the RJ-45 connection on a firewall as a console because its cable is blue, while the interface status shows routed Ethernet traffic. The present fictional Lakebridge Travel Office finding instead needs “Validate the approved gateway availability mechanism and host default-gateway address.”, verified by “The host reaches off-subnet services after the documented gateway failover mechanism operates.”.
Question 634
The local support team reports: At the fictional Lakebridge Travel Office before a planned system change, the team observes: A network has a redundant router and a failed primary gateway but the host points to a single unavailable default gateway IP. What is the MOST specific underlying cause?
- A host's configured next hop must remain reachable, potentially through an approved first-hop redundancy design.
- Incorrect physical port mapping must be corrected before blaming logical configuration.
- Parallel Layer 2 paths without correct loop prevention can create repeated flooding and broadcast storms.
- MAC learning and aging or relearning govern how a switch updates host-to-port information.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:Correct. This mechanism fits the observed network symptom at the fictional Lakebridge Travel Office: A host's configured next hop must remain reachable, potentially through an approved first-hop redundancy design. The corresponding remedy is “Validate the approved gateway availability mechanism and host default-gateway address.”. Confirmation: The host reaches off-subnet services after the documented gateway failover mechanism operates.
Incorrect Answers
B:That cause belongs to a different case: A diagram explicitly labels rack A panel 24 to switch B port 7, but the installer connects panel 23 and concludes that logical VLAN changes will repair the wrong patch. The observed fictional Lakebridge Travel Office condition is specifically explained by “A host's configured next hop must remain reachable, potentially through an approved first-hop redundancy design.”.
C:That cause belongs to a different case: A junior engineer creates two direct Ethernet connections between switches and sees broadcast storms but disables all VLANs instead of checking Layer 2 loops. The observed fictional Lakebridge Travel Office condition is specifically explained by “A host's configured next hop must remain reachable, potentially through an approved first-hop redundancy design.”.
D:That cause belongs to a different case: A technician moves a workstation to a different port and the switch initially sends some traffic to its old location. The observed fictional Lakebridge Travel Office condition is specifically explained by “A host's configured next hop must remain reachable, potentially through an approved first-hop redundancy design.”.
Question 635
The technician must verify the following scenario: At the fictional Lakebridge Travel Office before a planned system change, the team observes: A network has a redundant router and a failed primary gateway but the host points to a single unavailable default gateway IP. The approved corrective action is: “Validate the approved gateway availability mechanism and host default-gateway address.” Which result BEST demonstrates success?
- The escalation includes the model-specific meaning rather than a universal claim that amber always means failure.
- The uplink appears in Ethernet interface status rather than being inferred from attached storage.
- The topology converges with no uncontrolled forwarding loop and broadcasts return to normal.
- The host reaches off-subnet services after the documented gateway failover mechanism operates.
Explanation
Correct Answer
D:Correct. This is the required observable acceptance evidence for “Validate the approved gateway availability mechanism and host default-gateway address.” at the fictional Lakebridge Travel Office. It demonstrates correction of the original cause: A host's configured next hop must remain reachable, potentially through an approved first-hop redundancy design.
Incorrect Answers
A:That result is evidence for a separate corrective action, “Record the exact model, LED name, color and blink pattern and interpret it using the model's documented table.”. It does not establish the intended outcome “The host reaches off-subnet services after the documented gateway failover mechanism operates.” for the fictional Lakebridge Travel Office case.
B:That result is evidence for a separate corrective action, “Check the model's USB purpose and use a supported Ethernet port for LAN uplink needs.”. It does not establish the intended outcome “The host reaches off-subnet services after the documented gateway failover mechanism operates.” for the fictional Lakebridge Travel Office case.
C:That result is evidence for a separate corrective action, “Examine the physical loop and the approved spanning-tree or port-channel design.”. It does not establish the intended outcome “The host reaches off-subnet services after the documented gateway failover mechanism operates.” for the fictional Lakebridge Travel Office case.
Question 636
A change reviewer considers: At the fictional Lakebridge Travel Office before a planned system change, the team observes: A network has a redundant router and a failed primary gateway but the host points to a single unavailable default gateway IP. During “Validate the approved gateway availability mechanism and host default-gateway address.”, which precaution MOST specifically prevents a related risk?
- Do not expect a serial console session to work without its physical or appropriate console-server connection.
- Do not interpret a transient boot sequence as steady-state failure without checking the guide.
- Do not invent an unapproved alternate gateway IP on endpoints during an outage.
- Do not substitute unrelated device ports simply because they are physically nearby.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:Correct. This precaution prevents a second fault while applying “Validate the approved gateway availability mechanism and host default-gateway address.” at the fictional Lakebridge Travel Office. The required protection is “Do not invent an unapproved alternate gateway IP on endpoints during an outage.”; success still requires “The host reaches off-subnet services after the documented gateway failover mechanism operates.”.
Incorrect Answers
A:This caution is appropriate for a separate failure pattern: A technician attempts an out-of-band serial session by entering a device's IP address in a terminal emulator without connecting a console cable. The principal adjacent risk here is controlled by “Do not invent an unapproved alternate gateway IP on endpoints during an outage.”.
B:This caution is appropriate for a separate failure pattern: A router is still booting but a trainee marks an unusual transient system LED as a persistent failure before the startup interval ends. The principal adjacent risk here is controlled by “Do not invent an unapproved alternate gateway IP on endpoints during an outage.”.
D:This caution is appropriate for a separate failure pattern: An engineer's drawing places an access switch uplink into the core router's Ethernet interface but the technician connects it to the router's USB service port. The principal adjacent risk here is controlled by “Do not invent an unapproved alternate gateway IP on endpoints during an outage.”.
Question 637
During entry-level network support, consider: At the fictional Cedar Valley Academy in a technician onboarding review, the team observes: A VLAN interface 10.3.5.1/24 is intended to route client traffic but lacks any configuration for reaching 10.7.0.0/16 on another router. Which action MOST directly resolves the reported issue?
- Verify the device's power source and compare its status LED with the correct model reference.
- Add or verify the approved route toward 10.7.0.0/16 and any necessary return path.
- Choose the correct physical COM or USB serial adapter and attach it to the Cisco console interface.
- Identify the console jack and attach a compatible USB or serial console adapter as specified.
Explanation
Correct Answer
B:Correct. In the fictional Cedar Valley Academy case, Routing between nonadjacent networks requires routes learned or configured along the path. The specified corrective action, “Add or verify the approved route toward 10.7.0.0/16 and any necessary return path.”, directly targets that condition. Evidence of resolution: A traceroute reaches the remote subnet and replies return without an asymmetric black hole.
Incorrect Answers
A:That action addresses a different network issue: A new switch has no power indicator after rack installation, but a trainee diagnoses failed IP routing before checking its supply. The present fictional Cedar Valley Academy finding instead needs “Add or verify the approved route toward 10.7.0.0/16 and any necessary return path.”, verified by “A traceroute reaches the remote subnet and replies return without an asymmetric black hole.”.
C:That action addresses a different network issue: A technician attempts an out-of-band serial session by entering a device's IP address in a terminal emulator without connecting a console cable. The present fictional Cedar Valley Academy finding instead needs “Add or verify the approved route toward 10.7.0.0/16 and any necessary return path.”, verified by “A traceroute reaches the remote subnet and replies return without an asymmetric black hole.”.
D:That action addresses a different network issue: A work order specifies a dedicated console cable from a notebook to a switch for initial setup but the tech plugs into the switch's user-data uplink instead. The present fictional Cedar Valley Academy finding instead needs “Add or verify the approved route toward 10.7.0.0/16 and any necessary return path.”, verified by “A traceroute reaches the remote subnet and replies return without an asymmetric black hole.”.
Question 638
The local support team reports: At the fictional Cedar Valley Academy in a technician onboarding review, the team observes: A VLAN interface 10.3.5.1/24 is intended to route client traffic but lacks any configuration for reaching 10.7.0.0/16 on another router. What is the MOST specific underlying cause?
- Routing between nonadjacent networks requires routes learned or configured along the path.
- VLAN membership confines ordinary Layer 2 broadcasts to their respective broadcast domains.
- A dedicated management port may be out of band and is not necessarily part of normal data switching.
- Redundant topology requires distinct documented ports and correct optical terminations on each link.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:Correct. This mechanism fits the observed network symptom at the fictional Cedar Valley Academy: Routing between nonadjacent networks requires routes learned or configured along the path. The corresponding remedy is “Add or verify the approved route toward 10.7.0.0/16 and any necessary return path.”. Confirmation: A traceroute reaches the remote subnet and replies return without an asymmetric black hole.
Incorrect Answers
B:That cause belongs to a different case: A technician sends an ARP broadcast in VLAN 20 and expects it to flood into VLAN 30 without routing or relay. The observed fictional Cedar Valley Academy condition is specifically explained by “Routing between nonadjacent networks requires routes learned or configured along the path.”.
C:That cause belongs to a different case: A device has both a dedicated management Ethernet jack and ordinary switched data ports, but an installer uses the management jack for end-user PC access. The observed fictional Cedar Valley Academy condition is specifically explained by “Routing between nonadjacent networks requires routes learned or configured along the path.”.
D:That cause belongs to a different case: A rack elevation places two redundant uplinks on separate switch ports but the installer connects both strands to the same unsupported transceiver and records two working paths. The observed fictional Cedar Valley Academy condition is specifically explained by “Routing between nonadjacent networks requires routes learned or configured along the path.”.
Question 639
The technician must verify the following scenario: At the fictional Cedar Valley Academy in a technician onboarding review, the team observes: A VLAN interface 10.3.5.1/24 is intended to route client traffic but lacks any configuration for reaching 10.7.0.0/16 on another router. The approved corrective action is: “Add or verify the approved route toward 10.7.0.0/16 and any necessary return path.” Which result BEST demonstrates success?
- Terminal output displays the switch CLI boot or login prompt from the correct interface.
- The phone powers and negotiates its Ethernet link on the correct powered interface.
- The terminal emulator shows a local device prompt without depending on a routed IP session.
- A traceroute reaches the remote subnet and replies return without an asymmetric black hole.
Explanation
Correct Answer
D:Correct. This is the required observable acceptance evidence for “Add or verify the approved route toward 10.7.0.0/16 and any necessary return path.” at the fictional Cedar Valley Academy. It demonstrates correction of the original cause: Routing between nonadjacent networks requires routes learned or configured along the path.
Incorrect Answers
A:That result is evidence for a separate corrective action, “Identify the console jack and attach a compatible USB or serial console adapter as specified.”. It does not establish the intended outcome “A traceroute reaches the remote subnet and replies return without an asymmetric black hole.” for the fictional Cedar Valley Academy case.
B:That result is evidence for a separate corrective action, “Identify a PoE-capable port and confirm the switch's available PoE budget.”. It does not establish the intended outcome “A traceroute reaches the remote subnet and replies return without an asymmetric black hole.” for the fictional Cedar Valley Academy case.
C:That result is evidence for a separate corrective action, “Choose the correct physical COM or USB serial adapter and attach it to the Cisco console interface.”. It does not establish the intended outcome “A traceroute reaches the remote subnet and replies return without an asymmetric black hole.” for the fictional Cedar Valley Academy case.
Question 640
A change reviewer considers: At the fictional Cedar Valley Academy in a technician onboarding review, the team observes: A VLAN interface 10.3.5.1/24 is intended to route client traffic but lacks any configuration for reaching 10.7.0.0/16 on another router. During “Add or verify the approved route toward 10.7.0.0/16 and any necessary return path.”, which precaution MOST specifically prevents a related risk?
- Do not infer port speed or duplex from an indicator currently set to another display mode.
- Do not assume a data link-up LED guarantees adequate power delivery to an endpoint.
- Do not assume creating a local SVI automatically installs routes to every remote site.
- Do not treat a USB storage slot as an ordinary RJ-45 data port.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:Correct. This precaution prevents a second fault while applying “Add or verify the approved route toward 10.7.0.0/16 and any necessary return path.” at the fictional Cedar Valley Academy. The required protection is “Do not assume creating a local SVI automatically installs routes to every remote site.”; success still requires “A traceroute reaches the remote subnet and replies return without an asymmetric black hole.”.
Incorrect Answers
A:This caution is appropriate for a separate failure pattern: A switch displays several selectable LED modes and a technician reads a power-over-Ethernet status LED as though it were showing duplex. The principal adjacent risk here is controlled by “Do not assume creating a local SVI automatically installs routes to every remote site.”.
B:This caution is appropriate for a separate failure pattern: A switch has a dedicated PoE indicator showing a supply fault but the operator checks only standard per-port link lights. The principal adjacent risk here is controlled by “Do not assume creating a local SVI automatically installs routes to every remote site.”.
D:This caution is appropriate for a separate failure pattern: A help desk operator inserts a flash drive into a switch USB port and assumes it has added a new Ethernet forwarding interface. The principal adjacent risk here is controlled by “Do not assume creating a local SVI automatically installs routes to every remote site.”.