Cisco Certified Support Technician (CCST) Networking 100-150 Practice Test 63
Question 620
A change reviewer considers: At the fictional Redwood Repair Shop during basic configuration verification, the team observes: A branch router has a specific route to 10.20.0.0/16 and a default route, but the trainee expects all 10.x.x.x traffic to use the default. During “Compare matching prefix lengths and use the 10.20.0.0/16 route for a destination such as 10.20.5.6.”, which precaution MOST specifically prevents a related risk?
- Do not assume a management Ethernet port is interchangeable with a data-plane access port.
- Do not configure learned source MAC entries as destination-only learning events.
- Do not ignore a more-specific valid route simply because a default route is present.
- Do not classify an interface's role based only on cable color.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:Correct. This precaution prevents a second fault while applying “Compare matching prefix lengths and use the 10.20.0.0/16 route for a destination such as 10.20.5.6.” at the fictional Redwood Repair Shop. The required protection is “Do not ignore a more-specific valid route simply because a default route is present.”; success still requires “The route lookup selects the specific network instead of ::/0 or 0.0.0.0/0 as appropriate.”.
Incorrect Answers
A:This caution is appropriate for a separate failure pattern: A device has both a dedicated management Ethernet jack and ordinary switched data ports, but an installer uses the management jack for end-user PC access. The principal adjacent risk here is controlled by “Do not ignore a more-specific valid route simply because a default route is present.”.
B:This caution is appropriate for a separate failure pattern: An access switch sees a source MAC arrive on port 5 but a trainee claims the MAC table can only learn destination MAC addresses. The principal adjacent risk here is controlled by “Do not ignore a more-specific valid route simply because a default route is present.”.
D:This caution is appropriate for a separate failure pattern: A network team labels the RJ-45 connection on a firewall as a console because its cable is blue, while the interface status shows routed Ethernet traffic. The principal adjacent risk here is controlled by “Do not ignore a more-specific valid route simply because a default route is present.”.
Question 621
During entry-level network support, consider: At the fictional Millview Retail while assessing a controlled network fault, the team observes: A host sees another device on the same 192.168.7.0/24 segment and sends all packets to its gateway rather than using local neighbor resolution. Which action MOST directly resolves the reported issue?
- Verify the MAC table and observe that known-unicast traffic follows the mapped port.
- Check the host's subnet mask and local neighbor resolution for the directly connected target.
- Correct the two-strand fiber polarity according to the transceiver and diagram.
- Confirm with the engineer and model documentation whether identification mode was activated.
Explanation
Correct Answer
B:Correct. In the fictional Millview Retail case, Same-subnet IPv4 destinations normally use direct Layer 2 delivery, not a routed next hop. The specified corrective action, “Check the host's subnet mask and local neighbor resolution for the directly connected target.”, directly targets that condition. Evidence of resolution: The host ARPs for the local peer and exchanges frames without routing through the default gateway.
Incorrect Answers
A:That action addresses a different network issue: A learner claims a switch broadcasts every known-unicast Ethernet frame to all active ports like a basic repeater hub. The present fictional Millview Retail finding instead needs “Check the host's subnet mask and local neighbor resolution for the directly connected target.”, verified by “The host ARPs for the local peer and exchanges frames without routing through the default gateway.”.
C:That action addresses a different network issue: An engineer's drawing shows an indoor fiber connection with separate transmit and receive channels, but the technician loops each optic's transmit back into its own receive. The present fictional Millview Retail finding instead needs “Check the host's subnet mask and local neighbor resolution for the directly connected target.”, verified by “The host ARPs for the local peer and exchanges frames without routing through the default gateway.”.
D:That action addresses a different network issue: A field tech sees a rapidly blinking identifier LED intentionally activated by a remote engineer and opens an outage ticket for the device. The present fictional Millview Retail finding instead needs “Check the host's subnet mask and local neighbor resolution for the directly connected target.”, verified by “The host ARPs for the local peer and exchanges frames without routing through the default gateway.”.
Question 622
The local support team reports: At the fictional Millview Retail while assessing a controlled network fault, the team observes: A host sees another device on the same 192.168.7.0/24 segment and sends all packets to its gateway rather than using local neighbor resolution. What is the MOST specific underlying cause?
- Same-subnet IPv4 destinations normally use direct Layer 2 delivery, not a routed next hop.
- A locator or identification LED may be intentionally controlled to find a specific unit in a rack.
- Port function is determined by actual hardware labels and configuration, not arbitrary patch-cable colors.
- Fiber transceiver ports require matching optical connectors and media, not telephone copper leads.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:Correct. This mechanism fits the observed network symptom at the fictional Millview Retail: Same-subnet IPv4 destinations normally use direct Layer 2 delivery, not a routed next hop. The corresponding remedy is “Check the host's subnet mask and local neighbor resolution for the directly connected target.”. Confirmation: The host ARPs for the local peer and exchanges frames without routing through the default gateway.
Incorrect Answers
B:That cause belongs to a different case: A field tech sees a rapidly blinking identifier LED intentionally activated by a remote engineer and opens an outage ticket for the device. The observed fictional Millview Retail condition is specifically explained by “Same-subnet IPv4 destinations normally use direct Layer 2 delivery, not a routed next hop.”.
C:That cause belongs to a different case: A network team labels the RJ-45 connection on a firewall as a console because its cable is blue, while the interface status shows routed Ethernet traffic. The observed fictional Millview Retail condition is specifically explained by “Same-subnet IPv4 destinations normally use direct Layer 2 delivery, not a routed next hop.”.
D:That cause belongs to a different case: A fiber uplink terminates in an LC optical transceiver but the worker tries to use a telephone RJ-11 lead to connect the switches. The observed fictional Millview Retail condition is specifically explained by “Same-subnet IPv4 destinations normally use direct Layer 2 delivery, not a routed next hop.”.
Question 623
The technician must verify the following scenario: At the fictional Millview Retail while assessing a controlled network fault, the team observes: A host sees another device on the same 192.168.7.0/24 segment and sends all packets to its gateway rather than using local neighbor resolution. The approved corrective action is: “Check the host's subnet mask and local neighbor resolution for the directly connected target.” Which result BEST demonstrates success?
- The reported port status matches the active LED mode and the device's management interface.
- The AP shows a healthy uplink indication and can reach its configured network service.
- The AP powers on and the assigned port negotiates a data link.
- The host ARPs for the local peer and exchanges frames without routing through the default gateway.
Explanation
Correct Answer
D:Correct. This is the required observable acceptance evidence for “Check the host's subnet mask and local neighbor resolution for the directly connected target.” at the fictional Millview Retail. It demonstrates correction of the original cause: Same-subnet IPv4 destinations normally use direct Layer 2 delivery, not a routed next hop.
Incorrect Answers
A:That result is evidence for a separate corrective action, “Identify the current LED display mode and consult the model's port-status legend.”. It does not establish the intended outcome “The host ARPs for the local peer and exchanges frames without routing through the default gateway.” for the fictional Millview Retail case.
B:That result is evidence for a separate corrective action, “Inspect the AP's Ethernet link LED and verify the switch-side physical and logical uplink.”. It does not establish the intended outcome “The host ARPs for the local peer and exchanges frames without routing through the default gateway.” for the fictional Millview Retail case.
C:That result is evidence for a separate corrective action, “Repatch the AP cable to the documented approved PoE-capable access port.”. It does not establish the intended outcome “The host ARPs for the local peer and exchanges frames without routing through the default gateway.” for the fictional Millview Retail case.
Question 624
A change reviewer considers: At the fictional Millview Retail while assessing a controlled network fault, the team observes: A host sees another device on the same 192.168.7.0/24 segment and sends all packets to its gateway rather than using local neighbor resolution. During “Check the host's subnet mask and local neighbor resolution for the directly connected target.”, which precaution MOST specifically prevents a related risk?
- Do not ignore the diagram's optical media and distance specifications.
- Do not describe stack identification lights as generic link-speed meters.
- Do not route same-subnet traffic unnecessarily just because a gateway address is configured.
- Do not configure user endpoint ports as broad unrestricted trunks without a requirement.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:Correct. This precaution prevents a second fault while applying “Check the host's subnet mask and local neighbor resolution for the directly connected target.” at the fictional Millview Retail. The required protection is “Do not route same-subnet traffic unnecessarily just because a gateway address is configured.”; success still requires “The host ARPs for the local peer and exchanges frames without routing through the default gateway.”.
Incorrect Answers
A:This caution is appropriate for a separate failure pattern: A diagram specifies a fiber link between two distribution switches but the installer uses a short twisted-pair patch cord to bridge the racks across a long cable tray. The principal adjacent risk here is controlled by “Do not route same-subnet traffic unnecessarily just because a gateway address is configured.”.
B:This caution is appropriate for a separate failure pattern: A technician photographs a stack member LED and labels it a line-rate speed indicator on a switch model with separate stacking status. The principal adjacent risk here is controlled by “Do not route same-subnet traffic unnecessarily just because a gateway address is configured.”.
D:This caution is appropriate for a separate failure pattern: A switch-to-switch uplink must carry several VLANs but one port is configured as a single access VLAN. The principal adjacent risk here is controlled by “Do not route same-subnet traffic unnecessarily just because a gateway address is configured.”.
Question 625
During entry-level network support, consider: At the fictional Silverleaf Clinic after a site connectivity report, the team observes: A router can reach an upstream router but cannot route to a downstream branch because its route points at an unrelated unreachable next-hop IP. Which action MOST directly resolves the reported issue?
- Attach the printer to its mapped access port and reserve the inter-switch trunk for switch uplinks.
- Correct the branch route's next hop based on the approved topology and directly connected networks.
- Correct the two-strand fiber polarity according to the transceiver and diagram.
- Verify the MAC table and observe that known-unicast traffic follows the mapped port.
Explanation
Correct Answer
B:Correct. In the fictional Silverleaf Clinic case, Static routes require valid reachable next-hop information or an appropriate output interface. The specified corrective action, “Correct the branch route's next hop based on the approved topology and directly connected networks.”, directly targets that condition. Evidence of resolution: The routing table resolves the next hop and a branch subnet ping succeeds.
Incorrect Answers
A:That action addresses a different network issue: A topology shows a printer on a user access port and a distribution trunk between switches; the worker cables the printer into the inter-switch trunk's far end. The present fictional Silverleaf Clinic finding instead needs “Correct the branch route's next hop based on the approved topology and directly connected networks.”, verified by “The routing table resolves the next hop and a branch subnet ping succeeds.”.
C:That action addresses a different network issue: An engineer's drawing shows an indoor fiber connection with separate transmit and receive channels, but the technician loops each optic's transmit back into its own receive. The present fictional Silverleaf Clinic finding instead needs “Correct the branch route's next hop based on the approved topology and directly connected networks.”, verified by “The routing table resolves the next hop and a branch subnet ping succeeds.”.
D:That action addresses a different network issue: A learner claims a switch broadcasts every known-unicast Ethernet frame to all active ports like a basic repeater hub. The present fictional Silverleaf Clinic finding instead needs “Correct the branch route's next hop based on the approved topology and directly connected networks.”, verified by “The routing table resolves the next hop and a branch subnet ping succeeds.”.
Question 626
The local support team reports: At the fictional Silverleaf Clinic after a site connectivity report, the team observes: A router can reach an upstream router but cannot route to a downstream branch because its route points at an unrelated unreachable next-hop IP. What is the MOST specific underlying cause?
- Static routes require valid reachable next-hop information or an appropriate output interface.
- The diagram assigns endpoint copper runs to switch access interfaces rather than an administrative console connection.
- The physical patch plan designates a power-providing switch interface for the AP.
- A learning switch forwards known unicasts toward the learned destination MAC port, not every port.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:Correct. This mechanism fits the observed network symptom at the fictional Silverleaf Clinic: Static routes require valid reachable next-hop information or an appropriate output interface. The corresponding remedy is “Correct the branch route's next hop based on the approved topology and directly connected networks.”. Confirmation: The routing table resolves the next hop and a branch subnet ping succeeds.
Incorrect Answers
B:That cause belongs to a different case: A wiring plan shows workstation cable runs terminating on patch-panel ports that should connect to a local access switch, but the installer jumps those ports directly into an unrelated WAN router console. The observed fictional Silverleaf Clinic condition is specifically explained by “Static routes require valid reachable next-hop information or an appropriate output interface.”.
C:That cause belongs to a different case: A PoE access point is shown on port Gi1/0/12 but the technician patches it into a non-PoE port and it stays dark. The observed fictional Silverleaf Clinic condition is specifically explained by “Static routes require valid reachable next-hop information or an appropriate output interface.”.
D:That cause belongs to a different case: A learner claims a switch broadcasts every known-unicast Ethernet frame to all active ports like a basic repeater hub. The observed fictional Silverleaf Clinic condition is specifically explained by “Static routes require valid reachable next-hop information or an appropriate output interface.”.
Question 627
The technician must verify the following scenario: At the fictional Silverleaf Clinic after a site connectivity report, the team observes: A router can reach an upstream router but cannot route to a downstream branch because its route points at an unrelated unreachable next-hop IP. The approved corrective action is: “Correct the branch route's next hop based on the approved topology and directly connected networks.” Which result BEST demonstrates success?
- The AP powers on and the assigned port negotiates a data link.
- The reported port status matches the active LED mode and the device's management interface.
- The workstation receives its intended access VLAN while management stays isolated.
- The routing table resolves the next hop and a branch subnet ping succeeds.
Explanation
Correct Answer
D:Correct. This is the required observable acceptance evidence for “Correct the branch route's next hop based on the approved topology and directly connected networks.” at the fictional Silverleaf Clinic. It demonstrates correction of the original cause: Static routes require valid reachable next-hop information or an appropriate output interface.
Incorrect Answers
A:That result is evidence for a separate corrective action, “Repatch the AP cable to the documented approved PoE-capable access port.”. It does not establish the intended outcome “The routing table resolves the next hop and a branch subnet ping succeeds.” for the fictional Silverleaf Clinic case.
B:That result is evidence for a separate corrective action, “Identify the current LED display mode and consult the model's port-status legend.”. It does not establish the intended outcome “The routing table resolves the next hop and a branch subnet ping succeeds.” for the fictional Silverleaf Clinic case.
C:That result is evidence for a separate corrective action, “Check the port roles and attach user workstations to approved front-panel switch access ports.”. It does not establish the intended outcome “The routing table resolves the next hop and a branch subnet ping succeeds.” for the fictional Silverleaf Clinic case.
Question 628
A change reviewer considers: At the fictional Silverleaf Clinic after a site connectivity report, the team observes: A router can reach an upstream router but cannot route to a downstream branch because its route points at an unrelated unreachable next-hop IP. During “Correct the branch route's next hop based on the approved topology and directly connected networks.”, which precaution MOST specifically prevents a related risk?
- Do not classify an interface's role based only on cable color.
- Do not equate a lit power LED with verified network connectivity.
- Do not set a static route through a next hop that the router cannot resolve or reach.
- Do not force a bare copper RJ-45 plug into an empty SFP cage.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:Correct. This precaution prevents a second fault while applying “Correct the branch route's next hop based on the approved topology and directly connected networks.” at the fictional Silverleaf Clinic. The required protection is “Do not set a static route through a next hop that the router cannot resolve or reach.”; success still requires “The routing table resolves the next hop and a branch subnet ping succeeds.”.
Incorrect Answers
A:This caution is appropriate for a separate failure pattern: A network team labels the RJ-45 connection on a firewall as a console because its cable is blue, while the interface status shows routed Ethernet traffic. The principal adjacent risk here is controlled by “Do not set a static route through a next hop that the router cannot resolve or reach.”.
B:This caution is appropriate for a separate failure pattern: A Cisco access point has power but no Ethernet uplink indication; the technician reports a working wireless backhaul solely from the power light. The principal adjacent risk here is controlled by “Do not set a static route through a next hop that the router cannot resolve or reach.”.
D:This caution is appropriate for a separate failure pattern: A switch has a removable SFP slot and a trainee tries to plug an RJ-45 patch cord directly into the empty metal cage. The principal adjacent risk here is controlled by “Do not set a static route through a next hop that the router cannot resolve or reach.”.
Question 629
During entry-level network support, consider: At the fictional Rivergate Branch during its network support shift, the team observes: A technician sees that packet TTL decreases at a routed hop and calls it corruption that must be repaired by disabling routing. Which action MOST directly resolves the reported issue?
- Patch the designated panel jacks into the mapped switch access ports.
- Interpret a TTL decrement as normal per-hop routing behavior and investigate only unexpected expiration or loops.
- Identify and use the designated Ethernet data port for network traffic; reserve console for local administration.
- Choose the correct physical COM or USB serial adapter and attach it to the Cisco console interface.
Explanation
Correct Answer
B:Correct. In the fictional Rivergate Branch case, IPv4 routers decrement TTL to help prevent packets from looping indefinitely. The specified corrective action, “Interpret a TTL decrement as normal per-hop routing behavior and investigate only unexpected expiration or loops.”, directly targets that condition. Evidence of resolution: A trace shows successive routed hops with decreasing TTL and successful destination arrival.
Incorrect Answers
A:That action addresses a different network issue: A wiring plan shows workstation cable runs terminating on patch-panel ports that should connect to a local access switch, but the installer jumps those ports directly into an unrelated WAN router console. The present fictional Rivergate Branch finding instead needs “Interpret a TTL decrement as normal per-hop routing behavior and investigate only unexpected expiration or loops.”, verified by “A trace shows successive routed hops with decreasing TTL and successful destination arrival.”.
C:That action addresses a different network issue: A technician connects an Ethernet patch lead to the blue-labelled console jack and wonders why no data-link address appears on the switch uplink. The present fictional Rivergate Branch finding instead needs “Interpret a TTL decrement as normal per-hop routing behavior and investigate only unexpected expiration or loops.”, verified by “A trace shows successive routed hops with decreasing TTL and successful destination arrival.”.
D:That action addresses a different network issue: A technician attempts an out-of-band serial session by entering a device's IP address in a terminal emulator without connecting a console cable. The present fictional Rivergate Branch finding instead needs “Interpret a TTL decrement as normal per-hop routing behavior and investigate only unexpected expiration or loops.”, verified by “A trace shows successive routed hops with decreasing TTL and successful destination arrival.”.
Question 630
The local support team reports: At the fictional Rivergate Branch during its network support shift, the team observes: A technician sees that packet TTL decreases at a routed hop and calls it corruption that must be repaired by disabling routing. What is the MOST specific underlying cause?
- IPv4 routers decrement TTL to help prevent packets from looping indefinitely.
- MAC learning and aging or relearning govern how a switch updates host-to-port information.
- An SFP cage requires a compatible pluggable module before the chosen optical or copper medium can connect.
- Dedicated system, stack and port LEDs indicate different categories of information.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:Correct. This mechanism fits the observed network symptom at the fictional Rivergate Branch: IPv4 routers decrement TTL to help prevent packets from looping indefinitely. The corresponding remedy is “Interpret a TTL decrement as normal per-hop routing behavior and investigate only unexpected expiration or loops.”. Confirmation: A trace shows successive routed hops with decreasing TTL and successful destination arrival.
Incorrect Answers
B:That cause belongs to a different case: A technician moves a workstation to a different port and the switch initially sends some traffic to its old location. The observed fictional Rivergate Branch condition is specifically explained by “IPv4 routers decrement TTL to help prevent packets from looping indefinitely.”.
C:That cause belongs to a different case: A switch has a removable SFP slot and a trainee tries to plug an RJ-45 patch cord directly into the empty metal cage. The observed fictional Rivergate Branch condition is specifically explained by “IPv4 routers decrement TTL to help prevent packets from looping indefinitely.”.
D:That cause belongs to a different case: A technician photographs a stack member LED and labels it a line-rate speed indicator on a switch model with separate stacking status. The observed fictional Rivergate Branch condition is specifically explained by “IPv4 routers decrement TTL to help prevent packets from looping indefinitely.”.