Microsoft DP-900 Azure Data Fundamentals Exam Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set 9 161-180

Visit here for our full Microsoft DP-900 exam dumps and practice test questions.

Question 161:

A large automobile manufacturer wants to build an analytical platform to process millions of daily sensor readings from connected vehicles. The platform must support Spark-based processing, notebook collaboration, Delta Lake for ACID transactions, scalable ETL workflows, and machine learning experimentation for predictive maintenance. Which Azure service should they use as the core compute engine?

Answer:

A) Azure Data Factory
B) Azure Databricks
C) Azure SQL Managed Instance
D) Azure Synapse Dedicated SQL Pool

Answer: B

Explanation:

Azure Databricks is the correct answer because the scenario requires a combination of Spark compute, distributed data processing, machine learning experimentation, notebook collaboration, and Delta Lake ACID transactions. Connected vehicles generate vast amounts of telemetry data per second—engine performance metrics, fuel efficiency trends, braking patterns, temperature data, GPS coordinates, and diagnostic codes. Processing all this information requires a platform with distributed compute capabilities and advanced data engineering tools.

Azure Data Factory is an orchestration tool and cannot provide Spark-based distributed compute capabilities. While Data Factory can trigger and manage ETL jobs, it does not support the kind of interactive data analysis, machine learning model development, or deep notebook collaboration needed in this scenario.

Azure SQL Managed Instance is a relational database and is not built to handle massive semi-structured sensor data at scale. It also does not support machine learning workflows, Spark clusters, or ACID transactions on distributed file systems.

Azure Synapse Dedicated SQL Pool is ideal for large structured warehouse workloads but does not provide the full capabilities of Databricks notebooks or deep integration with Delta Lake.

Databricks, however, provides a unified environment where data engineers and data scientists can collaborate using shared notebooks written in Python, Scala, R, or SQL. The ability to ingest and process large-scale telemetry with Spark makes Databricks suitable for automobile sensor data analysis. Delta Lake ensures ACID compliance, schema enforcement, and version tracking, which is essential for building reliable ETL pipelines, especially when sensor formats evolve over time.

Machine learning experimentation is facilitated through MLflow, allowing the automotive company to test predictive maintenance models. For example, Databricks can be used to train models that identify when brakes are likely to fail, when engines need inspection, or when battery performance begins deteriorating. Autoscaling clusters reduce costs and optimize performance by adjusting compute power on demand.

Combined Spark processing, machine learning lifecycle management, Delta Lake reliability, and collaborative notebooks make Databricks the only platform that fulfills all requirements. Therefore, option B is correct.

Question 162:

A multinational social media platform needs a low-latency database capable of storing user posts, follower relationships, real-time interactions, and JSON-based metadata. The system must support global distribution, multi-region writes, automatic indexing, elastic scalability, and multiple consistency levels. Which Azure service is the best fit?

Answer:

A) Azure Cosmos DB
B) Azure SQL Database
C) Azure Database for PostgreSQL
D) Azure Synapse Serverless SQL Pool

Answer: A

Explanation:

Azure Cosmos DB is the correct answer because the scenario describes a globally distributed operational workload requiring low-latency reads and writes, flexible JSON document structures, and elastic scalability across millions of users. Social media interactions—likes, comments, shares, chats, posts, and notifications—are extremely dynamic and require millisecond-level responsiveness.

Azure SQL Database is a relational service and cannot support globally distributed multi-master writes. It also does not automatically index JSON fields or scale elastically across multiple regions.

Azure Database for PostgreSQL, while capable of handling some semi-structured JSON workloads, cannot provide global replication with multi-region writes or automatic indexing. It is not designed for millisecond-latency global operations.

Azure Synapse Serverless SQL Pool is an analytics engine, not an operational database. It cannot serve real-time social media interactions.

Cosmos DB’s global distribution allows the platform to place read/write regions close to users around the world, minimizing latency. Multi-region writes ensure that users in different countries can interact without bottlenecks. Cosmos DB’s schema-flexible JSON storage is ideal for storing posts, user profiles, metadata, social graphs, and real-time interactions. Its automatic indexing ensures that every query—such as retrieving a user’s timeline—performs efficiently without manual index management.

Cosmos DB’s five consistency models give developers the flexibility to choose between strong consistency for critical data and eventual consistency for high-speed interactions. Autoscaling enables the platform to handle sudden spikes in user activity during trending events.

Because Cosmos DB is designed for precisely these types of high-scale, global, low-latency use cases, it is the only correct answer. Therefore, option A is correct.

Question 163:

A healthcare analytics organization needs a platform that orchestrates hybrid ETL pipelines connecting on-prem medical systems, SQL databases, SaaS patient management apps, and Azure Data Lake Storage. They require no-code data flows, hybrid integration runtime, pipeline triggers, error handling, and metadata tracking. Which Azure service should they choose?

Answer:

A) Azure Data Factory
B) Azure Virtual Machines
C) Azure Logic Apps
D) Azure Databricks

Answer: A

Explanation:

Azure Data Factory is the correct service because it is Azure’s primary cloud ETL orchestration and data integration platform, supporting hybrid connectivity, no-code transformations, and hundreds of connectors. Healthcare organizations often work with disparate systems—electronic medical record platforms, lab databases, imaging systems, cloud-based patient engagement platforms, and external APIs for insurance claims. Integration across these systems requires a specialized orchestration framework that ADF provides.

Azure Virtual Machines would require manual coding, custom ETL development, and ongoing server maintenance, making them too resource-intensive for regulated industries like healthcare.

Azure Logic Apps is more suited for workflow automation such as notifications or API orchestration, not large-scale data movement or analytical ETL pipelines.

Azure Databricks is a powerful Spark-based compute engine but lacks the ETL orchestration features needed to manage complex hybrid pipelines and coordinate multiple data sources. While Databricks can perform data transformations, it does not provide a no-code pipeline design interface or a broad set of built-in connectors for medical systems.

ADF’s Mapping Data Flows provide a visual drag-and-drop interface for building transformations without writing code. Features such as row-level transformations, joins, type conversions, and aggregate operations are executed on managed Spark clusters.

Integration Runtime allows secure connectivity to private networks where on-prem hospital databases are located. Healthcare pipelines often rely on scheduled ingestion, event-driven triggers (e.g., new records arriving), and data validation checks, all supported by ADF.

ADF integrates with Microsoft Purview for metadata management and lineage tracking. This is essential in healthcare, where compliance regulations require strict auditability of data flows.

Because ADF uniquely supports hybrid ETL, no-code transformations, pipeline monitoring, and metadata lineage, option A is correct.

Question 164:

A government security agency needs to build a system to analyze billions of daily logs from firewalls, identity management systems, surveillance networks, and endpoint monitoring tools. They require ultra-fast ingestion, time-series analytics, anomaly detection, pattern matching, full-text search, and a query language optimized for log analysis. Which Azure service is the best choice?

Answer:

A) Azure SQL Database
B) Azure Data Explorer
C) Azure Synapse Dedicated SQL Pool
D) Azure Blob Storage

Answer: B

Explanation:

Azure Data Explorer is the only Azure service purpose-built for massive-scale log analytics and time-series data processing. Security agencies depend on rapid processing of network telemetry, firewall events, and identity logs in order to detect threats quickly. ADX is designed exactly for this type of workload.

Azure SQL Database is not optimized for large-scale log ingestion or fast time-series queries. Attempting to store and query billions of logs daily would overwhelm its relational architecture.

Azure Synapse Dedicated SQL Pool is optimized for large-scale analytical workloads, but not high-frequency ingestion of log data, nor for the specialized indexing needed for fast text search and pattern detection.

Azure Blob Storage can store logs but cannot query or analyze them.

ADX’s ingestion engine supports high-speed streaming ingestion through Event Hub, IoT Hub, or Azure Monitor. Kusto Query Language (KQL) includes powerful functions for parsing logs, detecting anomalies, creating time-windowed views, identifying unusual activity, and correlating multi-source events. These capabilities are essential for identifying security threats.

ADX uses compressed columnar storage and indexing techniques that allow analysts to scan billions of logs in seconds. It integrates with Azure Sentinel for SIEM use cases and with Azure Monitor for operational analytics.

Because this scenario requires specialized features for security log analytics, Azure Data Explorer is the correct answer.

Question 165:

A multinational corporation wants a unified data governance platform that automatically scans Azure SQL, Synapse, Data Lake Storage, Power BI, and on-prem SQL Server. They require classification, lineage visualization, a business glossary, and a searchable catalog for analysts and compliance teams. Which Azure service should they deploy?

Answer:

A) Azure Information Protection
B) Microsoft Purview
C) Azure Backup
D) Azure Active Directory

Answer: B

Explanation:

Microsoft Purview is the correct answer because it provides enterprise-grade data governance capabilities such as automated data scanning, metadata extraction, lineage visualization, classification, and a fully searchable catalog. These capabilities are critical for large multinational corporations operating under strict compliance frameworks.

Azure Information Protection focuses on document labeling and encryption but does not provide data governance or lineage across databases and analytics tools.

Azure Backup is used for data protection and recovery, not governance or cataloging.

Azure Active Directory manages identities and permissions, not data governance.

Purview integrates with Azure SQL, Synapse Analytics, Data Lake Storage, Power BI, and on-prem SQL Servers using self-hosted integration runtimes. Its scanning engine automatically discovers datasets, extracts metadata, identifies sensitive information, and applies classifications. Business glossaries help organizations standardize definitions, ensuring clear communication across global teams.

Purview’s lineage views provide transparency into how data moves across data pipelines, making it easier for compliance teams to audit processes and for engineers to troubleshoot data issues. Because Purview provides all required governance features, option B is correct.

Question 166:

A global logistics corporation wants to build a large-scale analytics environment to process IoT sensor data from delivery vehicles, warehouses, and shipping containers. They require Spark-based distributed processing, collaborative notebooks, Delta Lake for ACID transactions, job scheduling, and ML experimentation for route optimization and predictive maintenance. Which Azure service should they use?

Answer:

A) Azure Data Factory
B) Azure Databricks
C) Azure SQL Database
D) Azure Database for PostgreSQL

Answer: B

Explanation:

Azure Databricks is the correct answer because the logistics corporation requires a comprehensive data engineering and analytics environment capable of processing IoT data at massive scale. Delivery vehicles and warehouses generate enormous volumes of telemetry, including temperature readings, GPS coordinates, fuel consumption, brake pressure, engine diagnostics, inventory movement, and container handling records. These datasets are semi-structured, continuously flowing, and require distributed compute for real-time and batch processing.

Azure Data Factory is an effective orchestration service but cannot act as a primary compute engine for large-scale Spark workloads. It lacks ML experimentation support, notebook collaboration, and ACID transaction mechanisms for data lakes.

Azure SQL Database is a relational OLTP engine optimized for structured, transactional workloads. It cannot process semi-structured streams at IoT scale and lacks machine learning lifecycle capability, distributed Spark processing, and Delta Lake ACID transactions.

Azure Database for PostgreSQL supports JSON workloads but is not built for large-scale IoT ingestion, machine learning pipelines, or distributed processing.

Databricks provides Apache Spark clusters capable of handling real-time streaming ingestion using Structured Streaming. This is crucial because logistics companies often require real-time location tracking, container temperature monitoring, and operational status updates. Databricks notebooks allow engineers and analysts to collaborate using Python, Scala, SQL, or R. Delta Lake ensures reliable ingestion pipelines with ACID transactions, schema enforcement, data versioning, and time travel.

Predictive maintenance is a key requirement in logistics. Using Databricks with MLflow, the organization can build models that detect tire wear patterns, engine anomalies, optimal service intervals, or potential equipment failures. Databricks job scheduling enables batch workflows, such as nightly processing of vehicle logs or daily ETL runs.

Autoscaling clusters make Databricks cost-effective by scaling compute up during heavy IoT ingestion and down during low-traffic hours. Combined with Delta Lake’s reliability and Spark’s distributed capabilities, Databricks becomes the optimal solution for global logistics analytics. Therefore, option B is correct.

Question 167:

A global instant messaging platform requires a database that can handle millions of concurrent users, low-latency reads and writes, JSON message structures, user presence information, multi-region writes, and elastic scalability. The platform must also provide automatic indexing and multiple consistency models. Which Azure service fulfills these needs?

Answer:

A) Azure Cosmos DB
B) Azure SQL Managed Instance
C) Azure Synapse Serverless SQL Pool
D) Azure MariaDB

Answer: A

Explanation:

Azure Cosmos DB is the best choice because global messaging platforms require extremely low-latency, high-throughput operational workloads capable of supporting millions of simultaneous users. Messaging systems must store user sessions, presence indicators, chat messages, typing notifications, timestamps, attachments, and metadata—nearly all in flexible JSON structures.

Azure SQL Managed Instance cannot natively store high-volume JSON documents at scale and lacks multi-region write capabilities. Relational indexes must be manually managed, and performance struggles under massive, globally distributed, read/write workloads.

Azure Synapse Serverless SQL Pool is built for data lake analytics, not real-time operational messaging. It cannot handle the continuous transactional workload of message ingestion and user presence updates.

Azure MariaDB is a relational database and is not suitable for high-traffic global messaging systems requiring instant writes and distributed consistency modes.

Cosmos DB provides multi-region writes, ensuring that messages sent from any geographic location are written to the nearest data center, minimizing latency. Automatic indexing across all document fields ensures fast queries without index management. Consistency levels allow developers to choose the right model: strong consistency for critical data, session consistency for chats, and eventual consistency for high-speed telemetry.

Cosmos DB’s elastic scalability allows the platform to handle surges in messaging traffic, such as during global events or holidays. Its ability to replicate data across multiple regions ensures high availability and fault tolerance.

Because of its unmatched global distribution, JSON support, and low-latency performance, Cosmos DB is the correct service. Therefore, option A is correct.

Question 168:

A healthcare data integration company must create hybrid ETL pipelines that connect to on-prem hospital systems, SQL databases, cloud APIs, and Azure Data Lake Storage. They need no-code transformations, monitoring dashboards, pipeline triggers, hybrid integration runtime, and data lineage management. Which Azure service should they choose?

Answer:

A) Azure Logic Apps
B) Azure Data Factory
C) Azure Virtual Machines
D) Azure Databricks

Answer: B

Explanation:

Azure Data Factory is the correct answer because it is Azure’s ETL and data integration platform designed to orchestrate large-scale hybrid pipelines. Healthcare organizations work with diverse sources such as EMR systems, PACS imaging servers, lab result systems, medical device feeds, insurance systems, SaaS patient portals, and external regulatory APIs. These require a service that can integrate, transform, and monitor data flows reliably.

Azure Logic Apps is suitable for workflow automation but not for large ETL workloads. It lacks robust high-volume data ingestion, transformation mapping, and hybrid runtime capabilities.

Azure Virtual Machines would require custom ETL code, manual maintenance, version control, and monitoring scripts. This introduces unnecessary operational overhead and lacks ADF’s built-in connectors and pipeline triggers.

Azure Databricks offers powerful Spark processing but does not provide ADF’s pipeline orchestration, no-code data flows, hybrid connectivity, or hundreds of connectors designed for enterprise integration.

ADF supports Mapping Data Flows, enabling visual no-code transformations such as joining datasets, deriving fields, aggregating values, handling nulls, and type conversions. Integration Runtime allows connecting securely to on-prem medical systems, making it ideal for hybrid healthcare environments.

ADF’s monitoring tools track pipeline execution, latency, data throughput, and errors. Healthcare organizations rely on these capabilities to ensure compliance, operational readiness, and availability of critical patient datasets. ADF integrates with Purview for lineage visualization, which is essential for audits, compliance reporting, and transparency in healthcare data pipelines.

Because ADF uniquely satisfies the hybrid connectivity, no-code transformation, and orchestration requirements, option B is correct.

Question 169:

A cybersecurity operations center needs a system to analyze large volumes of firewall logs, identity access logs, threat detection signals, and system telemetry. They require sub-second querying, time-series analytics, anomaly detection, pattern matching, full-text search, and real-time ingestion. Which Azure service should they use?

Answer:

A) Azure Synapse Dedicated SQL Pool
B) Azure Data Explorer
C) Azure SQL Database
D) Azure Blob Storage

Answer: B

Explanation:

Azure Data Explorer is the best solution because it is optimized for log analytics and time-series analysis at extreme scale. Security operations centers rely on the ability to ingest and correlate billions of events daily. They must detect anomalies quickly to respond to emerging threats.

Azure Synapse Dedicated SQL Pool is suited for structured analytical workloads, not continuous ingestion or real-time anomaly detection across logs.

Azure SQL Database cannot store or process billions of logs efficiently and does not offer high-speed full-text search or pattern matching capabilities tailored for security analytics.

Azure Blob Storage can store logs inexpensively but cannot analyze them.

ADX uses compressed columnar storage, which enables extremely fast query execution. KQL supports log parsing, time-window analysis, join operations, pattern matching, anomaly detection, and aggregation. It also integrates with Azure Sentinel for SIEM scenarios and Azure Monitor for observability.

Real-time ingestion pipelines can be built using Event Hub or IoT Hub, enabling the SOC to ingest logs as they are generated. ADX supports advanced anomaly detection functions such as series_decompose_anomalies, making it ideal for threat hunting and intrusion analysis.

Because no other service provides comparable performance and query capabilities for log analytics, Azure Data Explorer is the correct choice. Therefore, option B is correct.

Question 170:

A multinational enterprise needs a complete data governance platform that scans Azure SQL, Synapse Analytics, Data Lake Storage, Power BI, and on-prem SQL Servers. They require classification, automated scanning, business glossary, lineage diagrams, and a central searchable catalog for analysts and compliance teams. Which Azure service should they deploy?

Answer:

A) Azure Active Directory
B) Microsoft Purview
C) Azure Key Vault
D) Azure Monitor

Answer: B

Explanation:

Microsoft Purview is the correct solution because it provides end-to-end governance, cataloging, classification, metadata scanning, and lineage tracking across hybrid data environments. Large enterprises operate in regulated industries where audits, compliance tracking, data lineage visibility, and metadata classification are essential.

Azure Active Directory handles identity and authentication but does not provide governance capabilities over datasets.

Azure Key Vault stores keys and secrets but cannot classify or catalog data.

Azure Monitor collects metrics and logs but does not provide cataloging, lineage, or data scanning capabilities.

Purview can automatically scan cloud and on-prem data sources using built-in connectors. It extracts metadata such as table schemas, column names, classifications, and data usage patterns. Classifications help detect sensitive fields like personal health information, financial records, or confidential documents. The business glossary allows defining enterprise-wide terminology with governance roles and stewardship assignments.

Lineage diagrams in Purview show data flow from ingestion to transformation to reporting, enabling compliance teams to validate data pipelines. Analysts use the searchable catalog to find approved datasets quickly. Purview integrates with ADF, Synapse, and Databricks, making lineage tracking easy across multiple services.

Because it provides all required governance, scanning, classification, and cataloging features, Purview is the only correct answer. Therefore, option B is correct.

Question 171:

A global ride-hailing company needs a platform to analyze real-time streaming data from vehicles, drivers, and riders. They require Spark-based processing, collaborative notebooks, Delta Lake for ACID transactions, ML lifecycle management, and automated job scheduling for continuous ETL. Which Azure service should serve as the primary analytics engine?

Answer:

A) Azure Databricks
B) Azure Data Factory
C) Azure SQL Database
D) Azure Stream Analytics

Answer: A

Explanation:

Azure Databricks is the correct choice because the scenario describes a complex analytics environment requiring distributed Spark compute, notebook collaboration, Delta Lake ACID transactions, and full lifecycle machine learning capabilities. Ride-hailing companies depend heavily on real-time and historical data to optimize operations, calculate pricing, monitor driver performance, and manage supply-and-demand balancing. These activities generate massive telemetry streams from mobile devices, GPS systems, and in-app activity logs.

Azure Data Factory is ideal for pipeline orchestration, but it does not provide the distributed compute engine needed for deep analytics, machine learning experimentation, or large-scale data engineering. It also lacks collaborative notebooks and Spark as a primary runtime.

Azure SQL Database cannot handle the scale, velocity, or semi-structured nature of ride data. Ride-hailing analytics require processing billions of GPS updates and real-time events. SQL Database is optimized for structured transactional workloads, not continuous streaming analytics or machine learning workflows.

Azure Stream Analytics can process streaming data efficiently but is limited to real-time ingestion and lightweight transformations. It does not serve as a full data engineering or machine learning platform, nor does it support notebooks, Spark clusters, or Delta Lake.

Databricks combines all the required capabilities. It provides autoscaling Spark clusters that can ingest data from Event Hub, Kafka, or IoT Hub and process it using Structured Streaming. This enables real-time ETL pipelines for rider location tracking, surge pricing models, and fraud detection signals. Delta Lake ensures that streaming jobs are reliable, with ACID compliance and schema validation that protect against malformed or out-of-order data.

Collaborative notebooks allow engineers and data scientists to work together while maintaining version control. MLflow integration supports experiment tracking, model versioning, and deployment workflows used for predictive analytics, driver risk scoring, or ETA calculations. Databricks Jobs can schedule batch and streaming pipelines, ensuring continuous data availability.

In large ride-hailing ecosystems, fleets of vehicles generate terabytes of sensor and event data daily. Databricks handles this scale through distributed compute, optimized execution, and persistent Delta Lake storage layers. These features make it the ideal choice for the given scenario, meaning option A is the correct answer.

Question 172:

A financial trading platform needs a globally distributed database capable of storing trade events, market signals, user portfolio data, and JSON-based analytics metadata. The system must support multi-region writes, millisecond latency, elastic scalability, automatic indexing, and multiple consistency models. Which Azure database should they use?

Answer:

A) Azure Cosmos DB
B) Azure SQL Managed Instance
C) Azure Synapse Dedicated SQL Pool
D) Azure Database for MySQL

Answer: A

Explanation:

Azure Cosmos DB is the correct answer because the scenario requires a globally distributed NoSQL database able to handle extremely high throughput, low-latency operations, flexible JSON documents, and multi-region write capabilities. Financial trading systems demand ultra-fast execution and near-real-time updates to ensure traders, algorithms, and risk systems always have fresh data.

Azure SQL Managed Instance is optimized for relational workloads and cannot provide the ultra-fast write speeds, horizontal scaling, multi-region writes, or JSON indexing needed by modern trading systems. It is not designed for sub-millisecond read/write access at global scale.

Azure Synapse Dedicated SQL Pool is a data warehousing solution built for analytical queries, not massively parallel operational workloads with constant state updates.

Azure Database for MySQL is relational and cannot support global distribution with multi-region writes or the level of elasticity that high-frequency trading platforms require.

Cosmos DB supports multiple APIs, including SQL, MongoDB, Gremlin, Cassandra, and Table, which makes it flexible for storing different types of trading metadata. Automatic indexing ensures that queries on trade history, portfolio positions, or market signals run efficiently without developer-managed indexing overhead. Multiple consistency models allow developers to choose the level of data accuracy required based on the use case.

For example, trade execution and settlement pipelines may require strong consistency, while non-critical telemetry or analytics logs can use eventual or session consistency. Cosmos DB’s capability to elastically scale throughput (RUs) ensures predictable performance even during extreme market volatility, such as economic releases or unexpected political events.

Cosmos DB also supports multi-region writes to minimize latency and reduce conflict windows in distributed trading environments. These capabilities make Cosmos DB the only suitable database for this scenario, confirming that option A is correct.

Question 173:

A health-tech analytics company needs an ETL platform that supports hybrid integration for on-prem hospital databases, cloud-based patient management systems, and API data sources. They require no-code transformations, data lineage visibility, pipeline scheduling, and monitoring. Which Azure service should they choose?

Answer:

A) Azure Logic Apps
B) Azure Data Factory
C) Azure Databricks
D) Azure Virtual Machines

Answer: B

Explanation:

Azure Data Factory is the correct choice because it is Azure’s primary ETL and data integration service, supporting hybrid connectivity, pipeline orchestration, visual transformation mapping, and end-to-end monitoring. Health-tech companies must integrate data from EMR systems, laboratory data repositories, imaging servers, third-party healthcare APIs, and cloud-based patient engagement platforms.

Azure Logic Apps is intended for event-driven workflows and process automation, not large-scale ETL operations or visual data mapping.

Azure Databricks is a powerful analytics and machine learning platform but is not designed to orchestrate hundreds of hybrid ETL pipelines or provide connectors to medical systems. It also does not include visual designer tools like Mapping Data Flows.

Azure Virtual Machines would require building an entire ETL framework from scratch, including connectivity management, transformation logic, logging, alerts, and monitoring dashboards—an impractical approach.

ADF supports hybrid Integration Runtime, enabling secure connectivity to private hospital networks and legacy systems. Its Mapping Data Flows offer a no-code transformation interface, essential for teams that do not want to manage custom Spark or Python scripts. ADF provides pipeline scheduling via triggers, along with robust logging and monitoring dashboards that assist in debugging and compliance reporting. ADF also integrates with Purview for lineage tracing, which is critical in regulated healthcare environments.

Because it satisfies all requirements—hybrid integration, no-code transformations, monitoring, and lineage—option B is the correct answer.

Question 174:

A national cyber-defense department must analyze billions of logs daily from firewalls, intrusion detection systems, authentication platforms, and network sensors. They require real-time ingestion, time-series queries, full-text search, anomaly detection, pattern matching, and lightning-fast query performance across compressed columnar storage. Which Azure service is the best fit?

Answer:

A) Azure Synapse Serverless SQL Pool
B) Azure SQL Database
C) Azure Blob Storage
D) Azure Data Explorer

Answer: D

Explanation:

Azure Data Explorer is the correct answer because it is purpose-built for high-volume log analytics, time-series ingestion, and interactive queries across billions of events. National cyber-defense systems must process log data at massive scale to detect attacks, investigate anomalies, and correlate signals across multiple systems.

Azure Synapse Serverless SQL Pool can query files but is not designed for real-time ingestion or large-scale anomaly detection.

Azure SQL Database is not capable of handling billions of logs daily, nor does it support the indexing or storage compression needed for fast scanning.

Azure Blob Storage is a storage system only and requires another service to analyze data.

ADX provides extremely fast ingestion, often via Event Hub or IoT Hub, and stores data in compressed columnar form for fast retrieval. Its Kusto Query Language offers built-in time-series functions, parsing tools, pattern-matching operators, and anomaly detection algorithms. These capabilities allow security analysts to detect suspicious patterns, identify intrusions, and correlate events across different systems in real time.

Because ADX is the only Azure service optimized for this type of workload, option D is correct.

Question 175:

A multinational enterprise needs a unified data governance system that automatically scans Azure SQL, Data Lake Storage, Synapse Analytics, Power BI, and on-prem SQL Servers. They require classification, business glossary creation, lineage visualization, sensitivity labeling, and a universal metadata catalog. Which Azure service provides these capabilities?

Answer:

A) Azure Key Vault
B) Microsoft Purview
C) Azure Monitor
D) Azure Active Directory

Answer: B

Explanation:

Microsoft Purview is the correct answer because it provides comprehensive governance, lineage tracking, metadata scanning, cataloging, and classification capabilities across hybrid data environments. Multinational enterprises often operate under strict compliance regulations and must track where data originates, how it is transformed, and who accesses it.

Azure Key Vault manages secrets and certificates but cannot classify or catalog data.

Azure Monitor tracks logs and metrics, not enterprise data assets.

Azure Active Directory manages identities but is not a data governance platform.

Purview integrates with Azure SQL, Synapse Analytics, Power BI, ADLS, and on-prem SQL Server to automatically extract metadata, detect sensitive fields, and apply classifications. Its business glossary feature promotes consistent definitions across teams, while lineage diagrams help auditors trace data movement through pipelines and transformations. Analysts can quickly locate datasets using the searchable catalog.

Purview is the only Azure service offering end-to-end data governance, making option B correct.

Question 176:

A global smart-city infrastructure company needs a data platform capable of processing continuous IoT feeds from traffic signals, environmental sensors, public utility meters, and fleet management systems. They require Spark-based distributed processing, collaborative notebooks, Delta Lake ACID reliability, MLflow for machine learning lifecycle, and job scheduling for hourly and streaming ETL. Which Azure service should serve as the main processing engine?

Answer:

A) Azure Data Factory
B) Azure SQL Database
C) Azure Databricks
D) Azure Synapse Dedicated SQL Pool

Answer: C

Explanation:

Azure Databricks is the correct answer because the scenario describes a highly complex IoT-driven data environment that requires distributed analytics, collaborative data science, and reliable data lake processing. Smart-city systems process continuous telemetry from traffic cameras, weather monitoring stations, pollution sensors, streetlight systems, energy meters, and fleet vehicle trackers. These data sources generate millions of records per hour across an entire city or region. Handling such volumes requires a platform designed for large-scale data engineering, real-time analytics, and machine learning experimentation.

Azure Data Factory is not suitable as the primary compute engine because it focuses on orchestration rather than computation. Although ADF can schedule and manage pipelines, it lacks the Spark-based distributed processing power needed to analyze large IoT datasets, and it does not offer notebook collaboration or MLflow integration.

Azure SQL Database cannot ingest real-time IoT data at massive scale and cannot handle complex transformations across semi-structured sensor formats. SQL Database is built for transactional applications, not continuous telemetry analytics.

Azure Synapse Dedicated SQL Pool excels at large-scale relational analytics but cannot replace Databricks for streaming IoT processing, notebook-based data science, or Delta Lake ACID capabilities. While Synapse has Spark pools, they do not provide the deep optimization, collaborative workspace, or MLflow lifecycle capabilities that Databricks offers.

Azure Databricks provides everything required in the scenario. It supports Structured Streaming, enabling real-time ingestion from IoT Hub, Event Hub, or Kafka. IoT systems rely heavily on streaming ETL to process temperature readings, CO₂ levels, traffic density, and fleet movement data. Databricks notebooks allow engineers, analysts, and data scientists to collaborate in real time. This collaboration is essential in smart-city analytics, where decisions often require blending knowledge from engineering, urban planning, public safety, and environmental disciplines.

Delta Lake provides ACID transactions, schema evolution, time travel, and high reliability across massive data lakes. ACID compliance is crucial for maintaining correct historical sensor records, especially when many devices send inconsistent or out-of-order data. Delta Lake ensures data pipelines remain stable even with unreliable IoT devices.

MLflow integration enables end-to-end machine learning lifecycle management. Smart-city systems rely on ML models for tasks such as detecting traffic anomalies, predicting pollution spikes, optimizing streetlight energy usage, forecasting electricity demand, and improving bus routing. Databricks Jobs can schedule ETL pipelines at interval-based or event-driven frequencies, enabling both batch and real-time analytics.

For city-wide IoT platforms that demand reliability, scalability, and machine learning integration, Databricks is the only service that matches all requirements. Therefore, option C is correct.

Question 177:

A global financial firm operating stock exchanges and bond trading systems needs a database capable of storing massive volumes of JSON-based trade events, pricing updates, risk signals, and portfolio metadata. The system must support multi-region writes, millisecond latency, auto-scaling throughput, and multiple consistency levels for different workloads. Which Azure service should they choose?

Answer:

A) Azure SQL Managed Instance
B) Azure Cosmos DB
C) Azure Database for PostgreSQL
D) Azure Synapse Serverless SQL Pool

Answer: B

Explanation:

Azure Cosmos DB is the correct choice because modern financial trading systems require extremely low-latency global operations with predictable performance, automatic scaling, and flexible JSON document support. The stock and bond trading environment is highly dynamic: trade executions, price fluctuations, market signals, regulatory updates, and risk alerts must all be captured within milliseconds. Any delay in processing this information can result in financial loss.

Azure SQL Managed Instance is not designed for global multi-region writes or massive JSON ingestion with full automatic indexing. It cannot elastically scale throughput during market surges such as economic announcements or major news events.

Azure Database for PostgreSQL supports JSON fields but lacks global distribution, multi-master writes, and automatic indexing for high-speed financial workloads. It cannot guarantee the millisecond-level performance required by real-time trading systems.

Azure Synapse Serverless SQL Pool focuses on large-scale analytics, not operational workloads. It cannot meet the throughput and latency needs of financial trading systems that must process millions of events per second.

Cosmos DB supports global distribution with multi-region write capabilities, making it ideal for trading companies operating across New York, London, Tokyo, Singapore, and other financial centers. Auto-indexing ensures rapid queries on trade events, market ticks, or portfolio metadata without requiring database administrators to tune indexes manually. The multi-model API allows storing graph data (market relationships), columnar patterns, or simple document structures.

Consistency models allow developers to choose the appropriate consistency for each scenario. Strong consistency is essential for trade settlement, while session or eventual consistency may be acceptable for price updates or risk calculations.

Cosmos DB’s elastic scalability ensures consistent performance even during peak market volatility. When major geopolitical or economic events occur, query volumes can spike dramatically. Cosmos DB automatically scales throughput to meet demand. Its multi-region failover capabilities ensure high availability, which is critical in financial industries where downtime is unacceptable.

Because Cosmos DB uniquely satisfies all latency, scalability, indexing, and distributed consistency needs of global trading systems, option B is correct.

Question 178:

A medical research analytics provider must build hybrid ETL pipelines that integrate data from on-prem hospital SQL Servers, laboratory systems, cloud-based EMR platforms, and various healthcare APIs. They require no-code transformation, hybrid integration runtime, trigger-based scheduling, full monitoring, and lineage visualization. Which Azure service should they deploy?

Answer:

A) Azure Databricks
B) Azure Virtual Machines
C) Azure Logic Apps
D) Azure Data Factory

Answer: D

Explanation:

Azure Data Factory is the correct answer because it provides a fully managed ETL orchestration environment with hybrid connectivity, visual no-code transformations, pipeline monitoring, and lineage integration. Healthcare research organizations frequently need to join data from disconnected systems: on-prem databases used in hospitals, cloud EMR systems used by practitioners, lab result services, imaging platforms, and external APIs for pharmacy or insurance verification.

Azure Databricks is powerful for analytics but does not provide the orchestration, monitoring, hybrid runtime, or no-code mapping capabilities needed for structured ETL flows.

Azure Virtual Machines require custom-built ETL solutions, which introduces maintenance overhead, security risks, and high operational costs in a regulated industry like healthcare.

Azure Logic Apps provides workflow automation but cannot handle large-scale data integration, nor does it provide transformation mapping or hybrid data movement at enterprise scale.

Azure Data Factory includes Integration Runtime, enabling secure connectivity to on-prem hospital systems, even those behind firewalls. Mapping Data Flows allow healthcare teams to visually define complex transformations such as combining patient lab results with EMR histories, merging diagnosis codes, or normalizing medical terminology.

ADF triggers support scheduling based on time, events, tumbling windows, or file arrivals. This is critical for healthcare research environments where data must be ingested at exact intervals for regulatory compliance or AI model training.

ADF’s monitoring dashboard helps track execution history, performance, data volume, and error handling—essential for validating clinical pipelines. ADF integrates with Purview, providing lineage diagrams that track data movement across ingestion, transformation, and reporting layers. Healthcare compliance auditors rely on these lineage trails to verify that workflows meet regulatory requirements such as HIPAA.

Because Azure Data Factory uniquely supports hybrid ETL, no-code transformation, and pipeline governance, option D is correct.

Question 179:

A national security monitoring center must analyze billions of events daily from intrusion detection systems, firewalls, network sensors, access logs, and endpoint telemetry. They require ultra-fast ingestion, time-series queries, pattern detection, full-text search, anomaly analytics, and sub-second querying across massive datasets. Which Azure service best matches these requirements?

Answer:

A) Azure SQL Database
B) Azure Synapse Analytics Dedicated SQL Pool
C) Azure Blob Storage
D) Azure Data Explorer

Answer: D

Explanation:

Azure Data Explorer is the correct answer because it is purpose-built for analyzing high-volume log and time-series data with extremely fast query performance. National security teams analyze data from multiple distributed systems to detect cyber threats, suspicious network activity, and anomalies across millions of devices.

Azure SQL Database is not designed to ingest or query billions of logs daily. Relational tables cannot efficiently store or index large streams of time-series data.

Azure Synapse Dedicated SQL Pool supports large-scale analytics but is optimized for structured warehouse workloads, not continuous ingestion or high-speed anomaly detection across log data.

Azure Blob Storage can hold logs but cannot analyze them without additional services.

ADX ingests data in real time using Event Hub, IoT Hub, Log Analytics, or Azure Monitor pipelines. It uses compressed columnar storage, allowing queries across billions of rows to return in seconds or less. Kusto Query Language includes powerful operators for parsing logs, detecting anomalies, identifying unusual authentication patterns, performing regex matching, and correlating multi-source events.

For national security applications, speed and scalability are essential. ADX supports time window aggregation, joining logs from multiple sensors, and running anomaly detection functions such as series_decompose_anomalies or machine-learning assisted outlier detection. These features make ADX the only Azure service designed specifically for this scenario.

Thus, option D is correct.

Question 180:

A multinational organization needs a centralized governance solution that automatically scans Azure SQL, Data Lake Storage, Synapse pipelines, Power BI content, and on-prem SQL Server. They require classification, business glossary management, sensitivity labeling, end-to-end lineage mapping, and a searchable enterprise catalog. Which Azure service should they deploy?

Answer:

A) Azure Policy
B) Azure Key Vault
C) Microsoft Purview
D) Azure Monitor

Answer: C

Explanation:

Microsoft Purview is the correct choice because it provides a unified governance experience that spans data discovery, classification, lineage tracking, glossary creation, and metadata cataloging. Multinational organizations operate under strict regulatory obligations such as GDPR, HIPAA, and financial audit requirements. They need to understand where sensitive data resides, how it flows, and who interacts with it.

Azure Policy governs Azure resource configurations but does not scan datasets or provide metadata catalogs.

Azure Key Vault manages encryption keys, certificates, and secrets, but it does not provide data governance or classification.

Azure Monitor collects logs and metrics but cannot classify or catalog enterprise data sources.

Purview automatically scans Azure SQL, ADLS, Synapse, and Power BI workspaces. Using a self-hosted integration runtime, Purview can also scan on-prem SQL Servers. Its classification engine detects sensitive data such as personal identifiers, health records, or financial information. Business glossaries allow organizations to create standard definitions for metrics, terms, and categories used across continents.

Lineage diagrams visually show data flow from ingestion through ADF or Synapse pipelines into reporting layers, enabling compliance teams to verify the correctness of processing paths. Analysts benefit from Purview’s searchable catalog, finding datasets faster and reducing duplication. With enterprise-grade governance, security, and scanning capabilities, Purview is the only service that satisfies every requirement listed in the scenario.

Therefore, option C is correct.

 

Leave a Reply

How It Works

img
Step 1. Choose Exam
on ExamLabs
Download IT Exams Questions & Answers
img
Step 2. Open Exam with
Avanset Exam Simulator
Press here to download VCE Exam Simulator that simulates real exam environment
img
Step 3. Study
& Pass
IT Exams Anywhere, Anytime!