Visit here for our full Microsoft DP-900 exam dumps and practice test questions.
Question 1:
You are analyzing transactional data stored in a SQL database for a retail company. You need to identify trends, calculate averages, and generate summary reports. Which type of workload does this scenario represent?
Answer:
A) Streaming workload
B) Analytical workload
C) Batch workload
D) Operational workload
Answer: B
Explanation:
An analytical workload is specifically designed for extracting insights from existing data, and the scenario presented fits this purpose exactly. When an organization already has historical data stored in a SQL database and wants to generate reports, calculate averages, perform trend analysis, or create dashboards, they are engaging in analytical processing rather than operational or real-time processing. Analytical workloads involve complex queries, aggregations, and sometimes predictive models that help the business understand patterns in customer behavior, sales performance, product demand, or operational efficiency. These workloads are typically executed on systems optimized for read-heavy operations and often involve large volumes of data accumulated over time.
This scenario differs significantly from operational workloads, where the goal is to process business transactions in real time, such as inserting new orders, updating inventory counts, or managing customer accounts. Operational systems prioritize speed, concurrency, and consistency for frequent write operations. If analytical queries were run on the same system, performance degradation could occur, so organizations often separate their OLTP (operational) and OLAP (analytical) environments.
Streaming workloads also differ because they involve continuous, real-time data ingestion. Examples include tracking telemetry from IoT devices, continuously processing financial transactions for fraud detection, or monitoring website clicks. The scenario does not mention real-time processing or live feeds, so streaming workloads are irrelevant.
Batch workloads process large amounts of data at scheduled intervals. While some analytical tasks can be executed in batch mode, batch processing describes how the data is processed, not the purpose of the workload. Analytical processing focuses on insight generation, not on timing.
Thus, based on the described tasks of summarization, trend identification, and report generation, this scenario represents an analytical workload. Option B correctly identifies the workload type because analytical tasks are concerned with querying historical data, performing aggregations, and deriving insights. These tasks align perfectly with the purpose of an analytical workload: understanding what has happened in the business, why it happened, and how it may impact future decisions. The goal is discovery, interpretation, and informed decision-making, which are not characteristics of operational, batch, or streaming workloads. Therefore, the correct answer is analytical workload.
Question 2:
A company stores customer purchase information in tables with primary keys, foreign keys, and fixed schemas. Which type of database model is best suited for this environment?
Answer:
A) Document database
B) Relational database
C) Key-value database
D) Graph database
Answer: B
Explanation:
A relational database is the most appropriate model for environments that rely on structured data, fixed schemas, primary keys, foreign keys, and well-defined relationships between entities. In the scenario provided, the company stores customer purchase information in tables with established structures. This strongly indicates the use of a relational database model, which organizes data into tables composed of rows and columns. Each table represents a specific entity, and relationships between these entities are maintained through primary and foreign key constraints. This structure enforces integrity and consistency, ensuring that data remains accurate and properly connected.
Relational databases are ideal for transactional systems that require ACID (atomicity, consistency, isolation, durability) properties. These characteristics guarantee that transactions are completed reliably, making relational stores suitable for purchase information where accuracy and consistency are essential. SQL is the standard language used for querying relational databases, providing robust capabilities for joins, aggregations, filtering, sorting, and reporting. Because purchase information typically requires complex queries, detailed reporting, and the enforcement of referential integrity, relational databases are the best match.
Option A, document databases, store data in semi-structured JSON-like documents. They provide flexibility when working with entities that do not follow a fixed schema or when each record may contain different fields. While document databases offer scalability and schema flexibility, they are not ideal for structured purchase information where strict relationships need to be maintained.
Option C, key-value stores, are designed for simple lookups based on keys. They do not support complex relationships or queries and are therefore unsuitable for environments requiring joins or referential integrity. Key-value databases are typically used for caching, user session storage, or situations where the value associated with a key does not require relational modeling.
Option D, graph databases, store nodes and edges to represent complex relationships. They are ideal for analyzing social networks, recommendation engines, or fraud detection systems where relationships between entities have significant importance. However, storing purchase information in this format would be unnecessarily complex and inefficient.
Because the scenario clearly describes structured tables, fixed schemas, and defined relationships, it directly corresponds to relational database principles. The need for consistency, structured queries, and enforcement of relationships makes relational databases the correct solution. Thus, option B is the appropriate answer.
Question 3:
Your organization needs to store JSON-based customer profiles that vary in structure. Which Azure service provides the most effective solution for this requirement?
Answer:
A) Azure SQL Database
B) Azure Database for MariaDB
C) Azure Cosmos DB
D) Azure Data Lake Storage Gen2
Answer: C
Explanation:
Azure Cosmos DB is designed to store and manage JSON-based documents with schema flexibility, global distribution, and low-latency access, making it the ideal solution for customer profiles that vary in structure. JSON documents often differ in field names, nested structures, and data types, and Cosmos DB accommodates this variability without requiring schema migrations or rigid data definitions. It supports multiple APIs, including the SQL API, MongoDB API, Cassandra API, Gremlin API, and Table API, giving developers flexibility when designing applications.
Azure SQL Database and other relational platforms enforce fixed schemas and structured table formats. Although SQL databases can store JSON data as text or use built-in JSON functions, they do not naturally adapt to records with differing structures. Repeated schema changes, performance issues, and storage inefficiencies can occur when forcing semi-structured data into a relational model.
Azure Data Lake Storage Gen2, on the other hand, is optimized for large-scale analytics and stores data in its raw form for batch and analytical processing. It is not intended for low-latency document retrieval or operational workloads, making it unsuitable for customer profile storage where quick access is often required.
Azure Database for MariaDB, similar to Azure SQL, fits relational use cases and is not ideal for flexible document-based storage.
Cosmos DB’s ability to index all properties by default, store flexible JSON documents, scale globally, and support tunable consistency levels makes it superior for environments where data structures vary frequently. Therefore, Cosmos DB is the correct option, making option C the best answer.
Question 4:
A company wants to store massive amounts of log files for long-term analysis and machine learning workloads. Which Azure storage service is best for this purpose?
Answer:
A) Azure Cosmos DB
B) Azure SQL Managed Instance
C) Azure Data Lake Storage Gen2
D) Azure Database for PostgreSQL
Answer: C
Explanation:
Azure Data Lake Storage Gen2 is specifically designed for large-scale data analytics, including storing massive amounts of log files, telemetry data, and machine learning datasets. It supports hierarchical namespaces, enabling efficient folder structures and optimized analytics processing. Its integration with Azure Synapse, Databricks, HDInsight, and other big data frameworks makes it the ideal platform for long-term analytical workflows.
Azure SQL Managed Instance and Azure Database for PostgreSQL are relational database systems optimized for structured data. They are not intended for large-scale unstructured log storage and would perform poorly and cost significantly more if used for such workloads.
Azure Cosmos DB is a NoSQL database optimized for operational workloads that require low latency and globally distributed access. It is not designed for analytical scanning of terabytes or petabytes of log data and would be cost-inefficient for this use case.
Because Azure Data Lake Storage Gen2 supports massive file storage, distributed analytics, hierarchical organization, and cost-effective long-term retention, it is the best choice. Therefore, option C is the correct answer.
Question 5:
You are building a system that must store user session information for rapid retrieval using a unique session ID. Which database model is best suited for this use case?
Answer:
A) Key-value store
B) Column-family store
C) Document store
D) Graph database
Answer: A
Explanation:
Key-value stores are designed for extremely fast read and write operations using simple key-based lookups, making them ideal for storing user session information. User sessions typically contain small amounts of data that need to be retrieved quickly using a unique identifier such as a session ID. Key-value databases excel at storing and retrieving this type of information efficiently due to their minimal overhead and straightforward access patterns.
Column-family stores are better suited for analytical workloads and queries that scan groups of related columns. They are not optimized for single-key retrieval scenarios where speed and simplicity are critical.
Document stores are more appropriate when storing complex JSON documents with nested fields rather than small, simple session values. While they can store session data, they introduce more overhead than necessary and are not as optimized for rapid key-based reads.
Graph databases specialize in representing complex relationships and connections between entities. They are ideal for recommendation engines, social networks, and fraud detection but are not suitable for simple session storage.
Because session data retrieval requires speed, simplicity, and efficient memory usage, key-value stores provide the perfect solution. Thus, option A is the correct answer.
Question 6:
Your company wants to implement a solution that can globally distribute data with low-latency access for users in different regions. The system should automatically replicate data across multiple geographic locations. Which Azure data service best supports this scenario?
Answer:
A) Azure SQL Database
B) Azure Cosmos DB
C) Azure SQL Managed Instance
D) Azure Database for MySQL
Answer: B
Explanation:
Azure Cosmos DB is uniquely designed to support global distribution of data with minimal latency, making it the most suitable solution for scenarios that require seamless multi-region replication. The scenario describes users in different regions who need fast access to the same dataset. Cosmos DB automatically replicates data to any Azure region selected by the organization, ensuring efficient read and write operations regardless of user location. This global distribution capability is not an add-on feature but an integral part of the platform architecture.
Cosmos DB offers additional features that make it well suited for globally distributed applications. It supports multi-master replication, which allows writes to occur in multiple regions simultaneously. This reduces write latency for global users and ensures the system remains available even if one region experiences downtime. Cosmos DB also offers tunable consistency levels, allowing developers to choose between strong consistency, eventual consistency, and several hybrid models depending on the application’s requirements. This flexibility is beneficial for applications where the balance between data correctness and performance can vary by operation or region.
Azure SQL Database, although highly scalable and resilient, does not natively support multi-region replication in the same simplified or automated manner as Cosmos DB. It allows for geo-replication, but this feature does not inherently provide the same level of write-distribution or global low-latency guarantees. Azure SQL is better suited for structured relational workloads rather than distributed NoSQL scenarios.
Azure SQL Managed Instance is also primarily a relational database platform intended for modernization of on-premises SQL Server workloads. While it can replicate data under certain configurations, it does not provide the global distribution capabilities required for instant worldwide access. Replication models are more limited, and the service is not optimized for multi-region writes.
Azure Database for MySQL, similarly, is a relational database service focused on transactional workloads. Although it supports read replicas, these replicas are not globally distributed in the same seamless manner as Cosmos DB, nor do they support multi-region write capabilities. The latency and management overhead associated with configuring global replication in MySQL make it unsuitable for the scenario described.
Cosmos DB is specifically designed for these global scenarios. It provides automatic indexing, support for multiple NoSQL models, low-latency reads and writes, and a fully managed environment that handles global replication transparently. It also guarantees performance through its service-level agreements covering availability, throughput, latency, and consistency.
Because the scenario emphasizes low-latency global access and automatic geographic replication, Cosmos DB is the only service among the options capable of meeting all requirements effectively. Therefore, the correct option is B.
Question 7:
A healthcare organization needs to enforce strict ACID compliance for patient record updates. Which type of database system should the organization choose to ensure transaction accuracy and data consistency?
Answer:
A) Key-value store
B) Relational database
C) Graph database
D) Document database
Answer: B
Explanation:
ACID compliance is essential in environments where data accuracy, consistency, and reliability are critical. Healthcare is one of the most sensitive industries for data management, requiring systems that guarantee complete correctness during every transaction. A relational database is specifically built to deliver strong ACID properties, ensuring that operations are executed reliably and consistently even in the presence of system failures, concurrency conflicts, or partial updates.
Relational databases enforce schema consistency, referential integrity, and strong transactional guarantees. These features make them ideal for managing structured datasets such as patient records, appointment schedules, billing information, and medical histories. In healthcare environments, data corruption or incomplete updates can lead to severe consequences, making ACID-compliant systems absolutely necessary.
Key-value stores prioritize speed and scalability over consistency. They often follow eventual consistency models, which are unsuitable for healthcare data. Their focus is on rapid retrieval and storage of simple key-value pairs, not on enforcing complex transactional integrity.
Graph databases are excellent for analyzing relationships between entities, such as mapping connections in social networks or analyzing biological pathways. However, they do not typically emphasize strict ACID transactional behavior across complex, structured datasets like patient records.
Document databases allow for schema flexibility and support semi-structured data, making them useful for managing varied record formats. However, while some document databases provide transactional support, they do not inherently match the robustness of relational databases in enforcing referential integrity and ACID guarantees across tightly coupled data entities.
Healthcare data involves interconnected tables and requires strict validation enforcement, atomic updates, secure concurrency control mechanisms, and guaranteed durability. Relational systems such as Azure SQL Database, SQL Server, PostgreSQL, or MariaDB are designed precisely for these needs. They prevent partial transaction commits, ensure stable data integrity, and are optimized for environments where correctness cannot be compromised.
Thus, because the requirement emphasizes strict ACID compliance for sensitive records, the relational database model is the only correct answer, making option B the best choice.
Question 8:
Your data engineering team wants to process billions of records using distributed analytics tools such as Azure Synapse and Apache Spark. Which data storage option is designed for this type of processing?
Answer:
A) Azure SQL Database
B) Azure Cosmos DB
C) Azure Data Lake Storage Gen2
D) Azure Database for PostgreSQL
Answer: C
Explanation:
Azure Data Lake Storage Gen2 is specifically engineered for large-scale analytics and distributed processing using tools like Azure Synapse Analytics, Databricks, Apache Spark, and Hadoop. The scenario describes processing billions of records, which requires horizontal scalability, distributed compute compatibility, and cost-effective storage for massive datasets. ADLS Gen2 provides all these capabilities by combining hierarchical storage with optimized access patterns for analytics workloads.
Azure SQL Database is optimized for structured relational data but is not suitable for storing or processing billions of unstructured or semi-structured records. Its performance would degrade significantly under large-scale analytical workloads, and storage costs would increase drastically.
Azure Cosmos DB is optimized for globally distributed, low-latency operational workloads. Although it can store large volumes of data, its pricing structure and performance characteristics do not align with big-data batch or distributed analytical processing needs.
Azure Database for PostgreSQL is designed for relational OLTP workloads. While PostgreSQL supports analytical queries to some extent, it cannot efficiently handle distributed multi-terabyte or petabyte-scale datasets the way a data lake can.
Because distributed analytical frameworks rely on data lakes as their foundation, Azure Data Lake Storage Gen2 is clearly the correct answer. Therefore, option C is the appropriate choice.
Question 9:
A social networking application must track complex relationships such as friendships, followers, and interactions among millions of users. Which type of database model is the most suitable?
Answer:
A) Relational database
B) Key-value store
C) Graph database
D) Document database
Answer: C
Explanation:
Graph databases are explicitly designed to store and analyze complex relationships between entities. Social networking platforms involve highly interconnected data structures, such as user relationships, likes, comments, group memberships, and shared interests. These relationships constantly evolve, and queries often involve traversing networks of connections, such as determining mutual friends, identifying influencers, or analyzing interaction patterns.
Relational databases struggle with performance when handling recursive relationship queries because they require complex join operations across multiple tables. As the dataset grows, these joins become progressively slower and more resource-intensive, making relational systems inefficient for graph-based workloads.
Key-value stores are optimized for simple key-based lookups and do not support relationship modeling. They cannot efficiently represent networks of users or multi-level interactions.
Document databases can store flexible structures but are not optimized for traversing relationships between documents. They are better suited for semi-structured data rather than relationship-heavy applications.
Graph databases store entities as nodes and relationships as edges, enabling efficient traversal algorithms. They support deep relationship analysis without requiring complex join logic. This makes them ideal for social networking, recommendation engines, fraud detection systems, and knowledge graphs.
Thus, the most suitable choice for modeling and analyzing complex user relationships is a graph database, making option C correct.
Question 10:
Your organization needs fast ingestion and analysis of real-time telemetry from thousands of IoT devices. Which type of data workload best describes this scenario?
Answer:
A) Batch workload
B) Analytical workload
C) Streaming workload
D) Operational workload
Answer: C
Explanation:
A streaming workload is defined by the continuous ingestion and processing of data in real time or near real time. The scenario describes telemetry being generated by thousands of IoT devices. These devices produce constant streams of sensor data, metrics, and event logs that must be processed quickly to enable actions such as alerting, monitoring, automation, predictive maintenance, and real-time insights. Streaming workloads are essential in environments where delays in processing could lead to equipment failures, security vulnerabilities, or operational inefficiencies.
Batch workloads are inappropriate because they process data at scheduled intervals rather than continuously. If batch processing were used in an IoT environment, the organization would risk delayed detection of critical anomalies or failures.
Analytical workloads focus on analyzing historical or static datasets rather than processing incoming data. While insights derived from analytics may support long-term improvements, they do not meet the immediate real-time demands of IoT telemetry.
Operational workloads support day-to-day business transactions such as updating records or processing customer interactions. They are not designed to ingest thousands of concurrent data events per second.
Streaming workloads support real-time pipelines, message brokers, event hubs, machine learning models, and fast decision logic. They allow organizations to respond instantly to data changes, making them essential in IoT environments.
Therefore, the correct answer is option C.
Question 11:
A retail company uses Azure Synapse Analytics to run large-scale analytical queries on historical sales data. They want to optimize performance by distributing the data across multiple nodes. Which type of processing model does this scenario represent?
Answer:
A) Massively parallel processing
B) Single-node processing
C) Key-value processing
D) Sequential processing
Answer: A
Explanation:
Massively parallel processing, often abbreviated as MPP, is a core concept behind large-scale analytical systems such as Azure Synapse Analytics, Azure Databricks, and other distributed compute platforms. The scenario describes a retail company running analytical queries on historical sales data while distributing this data across multiple nodes. This is precisely the definition of MPP, which divides large datasets into smaller chunks and processes them simultaneously using multiple compute nodes. The primary purpose of MPP is to accelerate query execution and enable organizations to perform sophisticated analytical operations on massive datasets that exceed the capabilities of a single machine.
Azure Synapse Analytics is built around an MPP architecture. Queries submitted to the system are broken into subqueries that are executed in parallel across multiple nodes. After each node performs its portion of the work, the results are aggregated and returned to the user. This parallelism allows organizations to perform complex joins, aggregations, and transformations at scale. It is particularly useful when analyzing historical sales data, inventory data, transactional logs, or any dataset with billions of rows.
Single-node processing, listed as option B, is inefficient for large analytical workloads because it relies on a single computing resource. Even high-performance hardware cannot match the speed of multiple coordinated nodes performing tasks simultaneously. Single-node systems bottleneck quickly when handling high-volume data, leading to performance degradation.
Option C, key-value processing, refers to processing in key-value stores where operations focus on simple key-based lookups rather than complex analytical computations. Key-value processing is valuable for caching, session storage, and rapid reads, but it cannot support distributed analytical workloads requiring large-scale joins or aggregations.
Sequential processing, option D, processes tasks one after another. This model is the opposite of distributed parallel processing and becomes extremely slow with analytical workloads involving massive data volumes. Sequential approaches may work for small datasets but will not scale to enterprise-level analytics.
MPP is essential because analytical workloads depend on speed, efficiency, and the ability to scale horizontally. By distributing both data and workload across nodes, MPP enables near-real-time analytics even with petabyte-scale datasets. It also ensures fault tolerance, because if one node fails, others can continue processing. Synapse’s distributed architecture is intentionally designed for these use cases, making MPP the correct answer.
Therefore, option A is the correct choice.
Question 12:
A logistics company wants to use Azure Synapse Analytics to integrate data from multiple sources including SQL databases, CSV files, and IoT sensor data. They want a single environment to ingest, prepare, manage, and serve data for analytics. Which Synapse component best supports this?
Answer:
A) Synapse Pipelines
B) Synapse SQL Dedicated Pool
C) Synapse Studio
D) Synapse Spark Pool
Answer: C
Explanation:
Azure Synapse Studio is the unified interface that brings all Synapse Analytics capabilities—data integration, data exploration, big data processing, SQL analytics, monitoring, and orchestration—into a single workspace. The scenario describes a need for integration from multiple data sources and a desire to ingest, prepare, manage, and serve data all in one environment. Synapse Studio is specifically designed for this purpose and acts as the control center for the entire Synapse ecosystem.
Synapse Pipelines, listed as option A, are primarily used for data ingestion and ETL/ELT workflows. Although pipelines play an essential role in moving and transforming data, they do not provide the unified workspace required to manage all aspects of analytics.
The Synapse SQL Dedicated Pool, option B, is the MPP-based data warehouse engine within Synapse. While it supports powerful analytical queries and distributed data storage, it does not manage ingestion, preparation, or orchestration on its own.
Synapse Spark Pool, option D, provides distributed Spark processing for big data analytics, machine learning, and data transformation tasks. Although Spark is an important part of Synapse, it is only one component of the analytical workflow.
Synapse Studio, however, brings everything together. It provides tools for data ingestion, SQL queries, Spark notebooks, pipelines, monitoring dashboards, data lake exploration, and security configuration. It creates a seamless environment where analysts, engineers, and data scientists can collaborate using a single interface.
Thus, the correct answer is option C.
Question 13:
A financial services company is required to store sensitive customer data in a database that ensures encryption at rest and encryption in transit. Which Azure feature helps guarantee encryption at rest for managed databases?
Answer:
A) Transparent Data Encryption
B) Azure Monitor
C) Azure Private Link
D) Azure Active Directory
Answer: A
Explanation:
Transparent Data Encryption, often referred to as TDE, is a built-in Azure database security feature that encrypts data at rest without requiring application-level changes. This means that the physical files associated with the database, including backups, transaction logs, and tempdb files, are encrypted automatically. In the scenario involving a financial services company handling sensitive data, encryption at rest is mandatory to ensure compliance with security standards and regulatory frameworks.
Azure Monitor, listed as option B, focuses on performance monitoring, logging, and diagnostic information. It does not address encryption needs.
Azure Private Link, option C, enables private network connectivity between services but does not provide encryption at rest.
Azure Active Directory, option D, handles identity and access management. While important for authentication and authorization, it does not directly encrypt data.
Transparent Data Encryption provides seamless protection by encrypting and decrypting data on the fly as the database engine reads or writes it. It ensures that if unauthorized individuals gain access to the underlying storage, they cannot read the raw data. Because the scenario requires encryption at rest, TDE is the correct answer.
Therefore, option A is the best choice.
Question 14:
Your organization wants to design a data warehouse solution that supports star-schema modeling, historical analysis, and optimized read performance for BI tools. Which type of workload does a data warehouse primarily support?
Answer:
A) OLTP workload
B) Operational workload
C) OLAP workload
D) Streaming workload
Answer: C
Explanation:
A data warehouse is specifically designed to support OLAP workloads, which focus on analytical processing rather than transactional processing. OLAP workloads emphasize read-heavy operations, aggregation, drill-down analysis, multidimensional queries, and trend evaluation. These workloads are ideal for scenarios involving business intelligence tools, dashboards, and reporting queries that analyze historical data.
OLTP workloads, associated with options A and B, focus on real-time transactional operations such as inserting new records, updating rows, or managing business transactions. They require high availability, strict consistency, and optimized write performance. These characteristics differ significantly from those of OLAP workloads.
Streaming workloads, option D, process real-time event data and do not align with the structured, historical, analytical nature of data warehouse operations.
Because a data warehouse is engineered for complex analytical queries, star schemas, slowly changing dimensions, and summarized historical datasets, the correct classification is OLAP workload. Therefore, option C is correct.
Question 15:
A development team needs a low-latency database capable of serving millions of read operations per second for a global gaming application. The data model is simple, using unique player IDs as keys. Which type of database model is most appropriate?
Answer:
A) Key-value store
B) Graph database
C) Column-family database
D) Relational database
Answer: A
Explanation:
Key-value databases excel in environments requiring extremely fast read and write operations with simple access patterns. The scenario describes a global gaming application with millions of read operations per second and a simple data model that uses unique player IDs as keys. Key-value stores are optimized for such workloads because they maintain minimal overhead, support scalable architectures, and provide low-latency data access across distributed regions.
Relational databases cannot handle the extremely high read throughput described in the scenario, especially with strict consistency requirements and schema enforcement.
Graph databases are unnecessary because the scenario does not involve complex relationships between players.
Column-family databases, although useful for analytical workloads and wide-column storage, are not as fast for key-based lookups as key-value databases.
Because the gaming application requires speed, simplicity, and scalability, the key-value model is the best choice. Therefore, option A is correct.
Question 16:
A software company needs to run complex analytical queries across petabytes of historical application logs. They want the system to scale out by adding more compute nodes rather than scaling up a single machine. Which data processing architecture should they use?
Answer:
A) Vertical scaling
B) Horizontal scaling
C) Single-thread processing
D) Key-value processing
Answer: B
Explanation:
Horizontal scaling is the most appropriate architecture for running complex analytical queries across petabytes of historical data. In horizontal scaling, performance increases by adding more compute nodes rather than enhancing the power of an individual machine. This approach is foundational for distributed analytics systems such as Azure Synapse Analytics, Azure Databricks, and Hadoop-based platforms. The scenario describes massive data volumes and complex analytical workloads. These requirements align perfectly with horizontal scaling, which distributes tasks across multiple machines that work simultaneously. This approach improves speed, reduces query latency, and supports fault tolerance.
Vertical scaling, listed as option A, increases performance by enhancing the hardware capabilities of a single system—adding more memory, faster CPUs, or larger disks. Although useful for smaller systems or transactional workloads, vertical scaling reaches limitations quickly, especially with petabyte-scale datasets. It also becomes cost-inefficient at high levels of hardware enhancement. Vertical scaling does not meet the requirement of distributing computation across multiple nodes.
Option C, single-thread processing, is impractical for large datasets and complex analytical queries. It processes operations sequentially and does not utilize the parallel performance benefits needed for large-scale analytics.
Option D, key-value processing, is designed for simple key-based lookups and does not support distributed analytical operations involving complex joins, aggregations, or scanning massive datasets. While key-value stores are extremely fast for retrieval, they cannot perform the advanced analytics described.
Horizontal scaling enables distributed computing clusters to divide queries into smaller tasks that run simultaneously. This architecture ensures consistent performance even as data volumes grow exponentially. It also allows organizations to dynamically increase compute capacity without downtime. Distributed systems can tolerate the failure of individual nodes because other nodes continue workload execution. This resiliency is essential for analytical workloads involving massive datasets.
Thus, the correct answer is option B.
Question 17:
Your organization needs to store semi-structured data such as JSON documents while maintaining the ability to query it using a SQL-like syntax. Which Azure Cosmos DB API is best suited for this requirement?
Answer:
A) Cassandra API
B) Gremlin API
C) Table API
D) SQL API
Answer: D
Explanation:
Azure Cosmos DB SQL API is the most suitable option when storing JSON documents and querying them with SQL-like syntax. This API enables developers to interact with JSON-formatted data using a familiar query language similar to SQL, making it accessible for teams that already understand relational concepts. The SQL API is the most widely used API in Cosmos DB and is optimized for document-style storage, indexing, and querying.
Option A, Cassandra API, emulates the Cassandra wide-column database. While it is powerful for large-scale write-intensive workloads, it does not provide SQL-like querying for JSON documents.
Option B, Gremlin API, is used for graph databases, where entities and relationships are stored as nodes and edges. It specializes in graph traversal queries, not SQL-like document querying.
Option C, Table API, provides a key-value and table-like storage model. While useful for simple data retrieval, it lacks advanced SQL querying capabilities and is not ideal for varied JSON structures.
The SQL API provides extensive indexing capabilities, supports rich queries, and integrates well with application development frameworks. It also supports hierarchical JSON structures and dynamic schemas common in semi-structured data scenarios. It allows for aggregations, filtering, joins (limited), projections, and UDFs, making it highly versatile.
Thus, option D is correct.
Question 18:
A company wants to simplify data ingestion, transformation, orchestration, and loading into their data warehouse. They need a cloud-based service that supports graphical pipelines and integrates natively with Azure services. Which service should they choose?
Answer:
A) Azure Data Factory
B) Azure Event Hubs
C) Azure Databricks
D) Azure SQL Database
Answer: A
Explanation:
Azure Data Factory is the primary Azure service designed for orchestrating, ingesting, preparing, and transforming data using pipeline workflows. It offers a graphical interface, code-free transformations, and strong integration with Azure storage, compute, and analytics services. Data Factory supports ETL and ELT patterns, making it ideal for loading data into a data warehouse.
Azure Event Hubs is a real-time data ingestion service designed for streaming workloads rather than batch pipelines or orchestration.
Azure Databricks is a powerful analytics and machine learning platform using Apache Spark, but it is not designed primarily for graphical orchestration or pipeline management. It excels at compute-intensive transformations but not at orchestrating system-wide workflows.
Azure SQL Database is a relational database system and does not support ingestion or pipeline orchestration.
Azure Data Factory provides connectors to hundreds of sources, integration runtimes for different computing environments, and a unified experience for pipeline monitoring and execution. It also integrates seamlessly with Azure Synapse, Data Lake Storage, Cosmos DB, SQL Server, and many other services.
Thus, option A is correct.
Question 19:
Your business intelligence team wants a data model optimized for slicing, dicing, aggregation, drill-down, and multidimensional analysis. Which type of model is best suited for this purpose?
Answer:
A) OLTP model
B) OLAP cube
C) Key-value data model
D) Document-oriented model
Answer: B
Explanation:
An OLAP cube is specifically built for multidimensional analytical processing. It supports operations such as slicing, dicing, drilling down, rolling up, and pivoting data across multiple dimensions. OLAP cubes power advanced analytics and business intelligence dashboards, making them ideal for executives, analysts, and decision-makers.
OLTP models, option A, are optimized for real-time transactional operations such as inserting or updating individual records. They cannot efficiently handle multidimensional analytical operations.
Key-value models, option C, store simple key-value pairs and are not designed for complex analytical queries.
Document-oriented models, option D, excel at storing flexible JSON-based structures but are not optimized for multidimensional analysis or aggregations.
OLAP cubes represent data in dimensions and measures, enabling extremely fast analytical queries even on large datasets. They are widely used in financial reporting, sales analytics, forecasting, and KPI dashboards.
Thus, option B is correct.
Question 20:
A company needs to store raw, unprocessed datasets for advanced analytics, data science, and machine learning. These datasets include images, logs, CSV files, and JSON files. Which type of storage is most appropriate?
Answer:
A) Azure SQL Database
B) Azure Data Lake Storage Gen2
C) Azure Cosmos DB
D) Azure Database for PostgreSQL
Answer: B
Explanation:
Azure Data Lake Storage Gen2 is the best solution for storing large volumes of raw, unprocessed data, including images, logs, CSV files, JSON files, and other unstructured or semi-structured datasets. It is optimized for analytics, machine learning, and big data processing. Data lakes act as centralized repositories for all enterprise data before transformation.
Azure SQL Database and Azure Database for PostgreSQL are relational and impose schema restrictions, making them unsuitable for raw data storage.
Azure Cosmos DB is designed for operational NoSQL workloads rather than raw big-data storage and analytics.
ADLS Gen2 supports hierarchical namespaces, distributed processing, and high throughput, making it ideal for big-data pipelines.
Thus, option B is the correct answer.
