Visit here for our full Isaca CISA exam dumps and practice test questions.
Question 21
During an IT audit, an auditor discovers that database administrator accounts have excessive privileges including the ability to modify audit logs. What is the PRIMARY risk associated with this finding?
A) Unauthorized modification of audit trails could conceal fraudulent activities
B) Database performance may be impacted
C) User access requests may be delayed
D) Software licensing costs may increase
Answer: A
Explanation:
Separation of duties and audit trail integrity are fundamental security controls ensuring accountability and detecting unauthorized activities. When database administrators possess privileges to modify audit logs, a critical control weakness exists that undermines the entire audit trail’s reliability. Audit logs serve as independent evidence recording user activities, system changes, and security events. If individuals with elevated privileges can modify these logs, they can potentially conceal fraudulent activities, unauthorized data access, or policy violations by deleting or altering log entries after the fact. This creates an environment where detection of malicious activities becomes extremely difficult or impossible. The primary risk is loss of accountability where administrators could perform unauthorized actions like stealing sensitive data, modifying financial records, or granting inappropriate access, then erase evidence of their activities by manipulating audit logs. This scenario violates fundamental audit principles requiring audit trails to be tamper-proof and independently verifiable. Organizations should implement role separation where security administrators manage audit systems independently from database administrators. Audit log storage should be write-once with restricted modification capabilities, preferably forwarding logs to centralized SIEM systems beyond administrator control. Compensating controls like monitoring administrator activities, implementing dual control for sensitive operations, and conducting regular audit log reviews can reduce risk when complete separation is impractical.
B is incorrect because while database performance is important for operational efficiency, it does not represent the primary security risk of administrators modifying audit logs. Performance impacts are operational concerns while audit log modification represents fundamental security control failure.
C is incorrect because user access request processing delays are administrative inefficiencies that do not pose significant security risks. Access delays impact productivity but do not enable concealment of fraudulent activities or undermine audit trail integrity.
D is incorrect because software licensing costs are financial considerations unrelated to audit log modification risks. Licensing compliance is important but does not represent the security threat of manipulated audit trails enabling undetected fraudulent activities.
Question 22
An organization implements a new enterprise resource planning system. What should be the auditor’s PRIMARY concern during the data migration process?
A) Completeness and accuracy of migrated data with validation controls
B) Project timeline adherence
C) User interface design preferences
D) Hardware specifications of new servers
Answer: A
Explanation:
Data migration represents one of the highest-risk phases in enterprise system implementations because data quality issues can have long-lasting impacts on business operations, decision-making, and compliance. The primary audit concern during data migration is ensuring completeness and accuracy of transferred data through comprehensive validation controls. Data completeness ensures all records from source systems are successfully migrated without loss, while accuracy ensures data values remain unchanged and correctly formatted in the destination system. Migration risks include data loss where records fail to transfer completely, data corruption where values change incorrectly during transformation, duplicate records creating data integrity issues, and referential integrity violations where relationships between data elements break. Proper migration methodology includes data profiling to understand source data quality, cleansing to address quality issues before migration, transformation mapping ensuring correct field-to-field correspondence, validation through reconciliation comparing source and destination record counts and key values, and extensive testing using production-like data volumes. Auditors should verify migration plans include checkpoints, rollback procedures if critical issues arise, and data validation at multiple stages. Post-migration verification ensures business processes function correctly with migrated data. Organizations often underestimate data quality issues in legacy systems that surface during migration requiring additional effort. Data ownership should be clearly assigned with business users validating migrated data accuracy for their functional areas.
B is incorrect because while project timeline adherence is important for project management, it does not represent the primary audit risk during data migration. Schedule delays are less critical than data quality issues that affect operational integrity and compliance.
C is incorrect because user interface design is a usability consideration that affects user satisfaction but does not represent critical audit risk during data migration. Interface issues can be addressed post-implementation while data quality problems may be permanent.
D is incorrect because hardware specifications support system performance but are not the primary audit concern during data migration. Infrastructure adequacy can be verified but does not address the fundamental risk of data loss or corruption during migration.
Question 23
During a security audit, an auditor finds that the organization does not maintain an inventory of hardware and software assets. What is the MOST significant risk of this deficiency?
A) Inability to identify and respond to unauthorized or vulnerable assets
B) Difficulty in calculating depreciation for financial reporting
C) Challenges in space planning for data centers
D) Complexity in vendor relationship management
Answer: A
Explanation:
Asset inventory management is a foundational security control enabling organizations to understand their technology landscape, identify vulnerabilities, detect unauthorized devices, and manage security patches effectively. Without accurate asset inventory, organizations cannot determine what assets need protection, which systems require security updates, or whether unauthorized devices have connected to the network. The most significant risk is inability to identify and respond to security threats because unknown assets create blind spots in security monitoring and vulnerability management. Organizations cannot patch systems they do not know exist, leaving exploitable vulnerabilities unaddressed. Shadow IT emerges where unauthorized devices and applications operate without security oversight potentially containing malware or creating data exfiltration paths. Incident response becomes severely hampered when responders lack comprehensive asset knowledge preventing quick identification of compromised systems and assessment of incident scope. Compliance requirements like PCI DSS and HIPAA mandate maintaining accurate asset inventories as prerequisite for securing cardholder or healthcare data. Asset inventory should include hardware devices, software applications, network components, and data repositories with attributes including asset type, location, owner, criticality, and configuration. Automated discovery tools scan networks identifying connected devices while software inventory tools catalog installed applications. Configuration management databases maintain asset relationships enabling impact analysis. Regular reconciliation between physical counts and inventory records ensures accuracy.
B is incorrect because while asset tracking supports financial reporting through depreciation calculations, this represents financial process efficiency rather than the most significant security risk. Missing financial data can be reconstructed while security breaches have broader organizational impact.
C is incorrect because space planning for data centers is an operational efficiency concern that does not represent critical security risk. Physical space constraints affect capacity planning but do not expose organizations to security vulnerabilities or compliance violations.
D is incorrect because vendor relationship management complexity is administrative overhead that does not constitute the primary security risk of missing asset inventory. Vendor management can be conducted through other means while security requires asset visibility.
Question 24
An auditor is reviewing an organization’s disaster recovery plan and finds that recovery time objectives have not been defined for critical systems. What should the auditor recommend as the FIRST step?
A) Conduct business impact analysis to determine acceptable downtime
B) Purchase additional backup hardware immediately
C) Implement real-time data replication
D) Schedule disaster recovery testing
Answer: A
Explanation:
Recovery time objectives and recovery point objectives are fundamental parameters in disaster recovery planning defining acceptable downtime and acceptable data loss for business processes and supporting systems. Before establishing disaster recovery capabilities or testing procedures, organizations must understand business requirements through business impact analysis. BIA is a systematic process identifying critical business functions, analyzing potential disruption impacts, determining maximum tolerable downtime, and establishing recovery priorities. The BIA involves interviewing business process owners to understand operational dependencies, financial impacts of downtime, regulatory requirements, and customer service level commitments. Results identify time-sensitive processes requiring rapid recovery and processes that can tolerate longer outages. RTO defines the maximum acceptable time to restore a business process or system after disruption. RPO defines the maximum acceptable data loss measured in time, determining backup frequency requirements. Without BIA-derived RTOs, organizations cannot make informed decisions about disaster recovery investments, technology choices, or recovery strategies. Hot sites providing immediate failover capability are expensive but necessary for processes with RTOs measured in minutes, while cold sites suffice for non-critical systems tolerating multi-day recovery. BIA findings also identify single points of failure, dependencies between systems, and resource requirements during recovery. Organizations should update BIA periodically because business requirements change as processes evolve.
B is incorrect because purchasing backup hardware without understanding business requirements may result in inappropriate investments that do not meet actual recovery needs. Technology decisions should follow requirements definition, not precede it.
C is incorrect because implementing real-time data replication is expensive and may be unnecessary for systems that can tolerate some data loss. Replication technology decisions should be based on RPO requirements derived from business impact analysis.
D is incorrect because disaster recovery testing validates existing plans and capabilities but cannot proceed without first defining what recovery targets should be. Testing is meaningless without established RTOs and RPOs to measure against.
Question 25
During an audit of the software development process, an auditor discovers that developers have access to production systems for troubleshooting. What is the PRIMARY concern with this practice?
A) Lack of separation between development and production environments creates security risks
B) Development costs may increase due to complexity
C) Software licensing may be insufficient
D) Code documentation may be incomplete
Answer: A
Explanation:
Separation of duties between development and production environments is a critical control ensuring system stability, data integrity, and security. When developers have direct access to production systems, multiple risks emerge including unauthorized changes where developers could modify production code or data without proper change control, introduction of untested code bypassing quality assurance processes, inadvertent errors where troubleshooting actions cause unintended disruptions, data exposure where developers access sensitive production data unnecessarily, and lack of audit trail when changes occur outside formal change management. Production environments should be isolated with restricted access limited to authorized operations personnel following approved change procedures. Developers should troubleshoot using development or test environments with representative data, not production systems with real customer data. When production issues require developer expertise, proper procedures include operations personnel granting temporary elevated access, developers working under supervision with all activities logged, and changes being reviewed before implementation. Developers with production access can circumvent controls by promoting code directly to production without testing, peer review, or approval. This creates significant compliance risks violating regulations like SOX requiring segregation of duties for financial systems. Organizations should implement privileged access management solutions enforcing just-in-time access with automated approval workflows and comprehensive activity logging. Break-glass accounts provide emergency access when needed with heightened monitoring and post-incident review.
B is incorrect because development costs are not the primary concern when developers access production. While there may be some cost implications, the critical issue is security risk and potential for unauthorized changes affecting operational systems.
C is incorrect because software licensing adequacy is a procurement and compliance matter unrelated to developers accessing production. Licensing should be addressed through software asset management regardless of development practices.
D is incorrect because incomplete code documentation is a development process quality issue that does not represent the primary risk of developers accessing production systems. Documentation can be improved through development standards while production access poses immediate security threats.
Question 26
An organization uses cloud services for data storage. What should be the auditor’s PRIMARY focus when assessing cloud security controls?
A) Review of service level agreements and shared responsibility model understanding
B) Physical data center location only
C) Cloud provider’s marketing materials
D) Number of cloud service providers used
Answer: A
Explanation:
Cloud computing introduces shared responsibility models where security and compliance obligations are distributed between cloud providers and customers. Understanding these responsibilities through thorough service level agreement review is essential for proper risk assessment. SLAs define provider commitments including availability guarantees, security controls, data protection measures, incident response procedures, and audit rights. Auditors must verify organizations understand which security controls the provider manages versus which controls remain customer responsibility. In infrastructure-as-a-service models, providers secure physical infrastructure while customers secure operating systems, applications, and data. Platform-as-a-service increases provider responsibility to include operating system security while customers manage application security. Software-as-a-service places most security responsibility on providers with customers managing access controls and data classification. Critical SLA elements for audit review include data location and sovereignty ensuring compliance with regulatory requirements, data encryption both at rest and in transit, access controls and identity management, logging and monitoring capabilities, backup and disaster recovery provisions, and right to audit including third-party attestation reports. Providers should offer SOC 2 Type II reports, ISO 27001 certifications, or equivalent attestations demonstrating security controls. Data ownership, retention, and deletion procedures must be clearly defined especially for regulatory compliance. Organizations should assess provider financial stability and business continuity because provider failure could cause significant disruption.
B is incorrect because while physical data center location matters for regulatory compliance and data sovereignty, it represents only one aspect of comprehensive cloud security assessment. Location alone does not ensure adequate security controls or appropriate shared responsibility understanding.
C is incorrect because cloud provider marketing materials present idealized capabilities and should never be primary source for audit assessment. Auditors must review contractual agreements, technical documentation, and independent attestation reports rather than promotional content.
D is incorrect because the number of cloud providers is a portfolio management consideration that does not directly indicate security posture. Organizations using multiple providers may have better redundancy or worse complexity depending on implementation.
Question 27
During a business continuity audit, an auditor finds that the organization’s backup tapes are stored in the same building as primary systems. What is the PRIMARY risk associated with this practice?
A) Physical disaster affecting building could destroy both primary and backup data
B) Backup retrieval times may be slower than expected
C) Tape media costs may be higher than necessary
D) Backup verification processes may be delayed
Answer: A
Explanation:
Geographic separation of backup media from primary systems is fundamental to disaster recovery because localized disasters like fires, floods, earthquakes, or building damage can simultaneously destroy both production systems and collocated backups. The primary risk of storing backups in the same building is total data loss during catastrophic events preventing any recovery capability. Geographic dispersion ensures that regional disasters cannot impact both primary and backup locations simultaneously. Backup storage best practices recommend off-site locations at distances ensuring different risk zones typically at least 50-100 miles away for regional disasters or different fire zones for localized incidents. Organizations should consider local disaster patterns like flood plains, earthquake zones, or hurricane paths when selecting backup storage locations. Cloud-based backup solutions automatically provide geographic separation through provider multi-region infrastructure. Physical tape transport to off-site storage introduces delays between backup creation and off-site availability creating a window where recent backups remain vulnerable. Electronic vaulting continuously replicates data to remote locations eliminating transport delays. Organizations should balance recovery time objectives against off-site storage distances because retrieving backups from distant locations takes longer than local recovery. Backup rotation schedules should ensure critical backups exist off-site before tape rotation cycles. Regular verification ensures off-site backup validity through test restores. Documentation should include backup location details, retrieval procedures, and transportation arrangements for disaster scenarios.
B is incorrect because while backup retrieval times are important for meeting recovery time objectives, slower retrieval represents operational efficiency concern rather than the catastrophic risk of complete data loss from building disasters destroying both primary and backup data.
C is incorrect because tape media costs are budgetary considerations that do not represent significant risk compared to potential data loss. Cost optimization is important but secondary to ensuring effective disaster recovery through geographic separation.
D is incorrect because backup verification delays represent process efficiency issues that do not constitute primary risk. Verification can be scheduled appropriately while collocated backup storage creates existential risk to data availability.
Question 28
An auditor discovers that critical patches are not being applied to production servers due to concerns about system stability. What should the auditor recommend as the BEST approach?
A) Establish test environment for patch validation before production deployment
B) Disable all production systems to apply patches immediately
C) Accept the risk and document in exception report
D) Remove internet connectivity to reduce vulnerability exposure
Answer: A
Explanation:
Patch management represents critical security control addressing known vulnerabilities that attackers actively exploit. However, production system stability concerns are legitimate because improperly tested patches can cause application failures, compatibility issues, or service disruptions. The optimal approach balances security requirements with operational stability through systematic patch testing before production deployment. Test environments should mirror production configurations including operating systems, application versions, and integrations enabling realistic validation of patch impacts. Patch testing procedures include deploying patches to test systems, executing functionality tests ensuring applications continue working correctly, monitoring system performance for degradation, and validating compatibility with existing software. Successful test completion provides confidence for production deployment. Testing timeline should be risk-based where critical security patches addressing actively exploited vulnerabilities receive expedited testing while less critical patches follow standard schedules. Organizations lacking test environments face difficult choices between security and stability often delaying patches unacceptably long. Test environment investment pays dividends through reduced production incidents and increased patch deployment confidence. Change management processes should document patch testing results, obtain appropriate approvals, schedule deployment windows, and establish rollback procedures. Some patches require minimal testing like antivirus signature updates while others like operating system patches need extensive validation. Virtual environments facilitate rapid test environment creation and snapshot-based rollback if issues occur.
B is incorrect because disabling all production systems for immediate patching causes business disruption without validating patch compatibility first. This approach prioritizes security over business continuity in unbalanced manner potentially causing operational incidents.
C is incorrect because simply accepting vulnerability risk and documenting exceptions does not address the underlying need to apply security patches. Risk acceptance is appropriate for risks that cannot be mitigated, not for risks where reasonable mitigation through testing exists.
D is incorrect because removing internet connectivity may reduce some attack vectors but does not eliminate vulnerability exploitation through other means like internal attackers, infected removable media, or compromised supply chain. Isolation is impractical for most systems requiring external communication.
Question 29
During an access control audit, an auditor finds that generic shared accounts are used for system administration. What is the PRIMARY concern with this practice?
A) Inability to trace actions to individual users reduces accountability
B) Password complexity requirements may be insufficient
C) Account lockout policies may not function properly
D) Single sign-on implementation may be delayed
Answer: A
Explanation:
Individual accountability is fundamental security principle requiring that actions be traceable to specific users through unique credentials. Shared accounts undermine accountability by preventing attribution of actions to individuals creating environment where users cannot be held responsible for their activities. When multiple administrators share a single account, audit logs show the shared account name rather than actual user identities making forensic investigation nearly impossible. This prevents determining who performed specific actions during security incidents, change management violations, or data breaches. Lack of accountability reduces deterrent effect because users know their actions cannot be attributed to them personally. Shared accounts complicate password management because password changes affect multiple users requiring coordination and creating periods where some users have incorrect passwords. Shared credentials often become widely known through informal sharing degrading security over time. When administrators leave organizations, shared account passwords must be changed affecting all remaining users rather than simply disabling individual accounts. Compliance frameworks universally require individual user accountability making shared accounts immediate audit findings and potential regulatory violations. Organizations should implement unique accounts for each administrator combined with privileged access management solutions providing session recording, command logging, and just-in-time access provisioning. Break-glass accounts may be necessary for emergency access but should trigger heightened monitoring and post-incident review. Service accounts for automated processes should be clearly distinguished from user accounts with appropriate access controls.
B is incorrect because while password complexity requirements are important for password-based authentication security, they represent technical control that can be applied to shared or individual accounts. Password complexity does not address the fundamental accountability problem.
C is incorrect because account lockout policies preventing brute force attacks can function with shared accounts, though they may cause operational disruptions when one user triggers lockout affecting all users. Lockout policy functionality is secondary to accountability concerns.
D is incorrect because single sign-on implementation is user convenience feature unrelated to shared account practices. SSO can be implemented independently of whether accounts are shared or individual, and does not address accountability requirements.
Question 30
An organization implements a new mobile device management solution. What should be the auditor’s PRIMARY concern regarding mobile device security?
A) Protection of corporate data on personal devices and remote wipe capability
B) Mobile device screen sizes
C) Battery life of mobile devices
D) Mobile carrier service plans
Answer: A
Explanation:
Mobile device proliferation and bring-your-own-device programs create unique security challenges because corporate data resides on devices outside organizational control potentially lost, stolen, or compromised. The primary audit concern is ensuring corporate data protection on mobile devices through technical and administrative controls. Mobile device management solutions provide centralized policy enforcement including encryption requirements ensuring data is protected if devices are lost, remote wipe capabilities allowing organizations to delete corporate data from lost or stolen devices, application containerization separating corporate and personal data, access controls requiring strong authentication, and compliance monitoring ensuring devices meet security requirements before accessing corporate resources. Personal device use for business purposes creates particular challenges because organizations must balance security requirements with user privacy expectations. MDM policies should clearly define what organizational controls apply to personal devices including what data organization can access, when remote wipe occurs affecting personal data, and monitoring capabilities. Users should explicitly acknowledge these policies before enrolling devices. Device compromise through malware, jailbreaking, or operating system vulnerabilities can expose corporate data requiring MDM to detect compromised devices and prevent corporate access. Data leakage through insecure applications, cloud storage synchronization, or backup services must be controlled. Acceptable use policies should define permitted device usage, prohibited activities, and user responsibilities. Organizations should consider mobile application management as alternative to full MDM when personal device privacy concerns outweigh full device management needs.
B is incorrect because mobile device screen sizes affect user experience and application usability but do not represent significant security concerns. Screen size is design consideration rather than audit risk requiring management attention.
C is incorrect because battery life is operational characteristic affecting device usability without security implications. While important for user satisfaction, battery performance does not create audit risks or security vulnerabilities that need primary focus.
D is incorrect because mobile carrier service plans are procurement and cost considerations that do not constitute primary security concerns. Carrier selection affects connectivity and costs but does not fundamentally impact corporate data protection requirements.
Question 31
During an IT governance audit, an auditor finds that IT strategy is not aligned with business objectives. What is the MOST significant risk of this misalignment?
A) IT investments may not support business goals and competitive advantage
B) Hardware refresh cycles may be delayed
C) Software licensing audits may be more frequent
D) IT staff training budgets may be reduced
Answer: A
Explanation:
IT governance ensures technology investments, initiatives, and operations support and enable business strategy. When IT strategy lacks alignment with business objectives, organizations risk investing resources in technologies that do not deliver business value, missing competitive opportunities, and failing to enable strategic initiatives. The most significant risk is that IT investments may not support business goals causing wasted resources on projects that do not advance organizational priorities. Misalignment manifests in various ways including implementing technologies that do not address actual business problems, failing to invest in capabilities that business strategy requires, prioritizing IT projects based on technical preferences rather than business value, and maintaining legacy systems that no longer support business processes. Strategic alignment requires ongoing collaboration between business and IT leadership through governance structures like steering committees ensuring IT understands business direction and business understands technology opportunities. IT strategic planning should derive from business strategic plans translating business objectives into technology enablers. Investment portfolios should be evaluated based on business value contribution with projects prioritized accordingly. Without alignment, organizations may find themselves with sophisticated technologies that do not address real business needs or lacking critical capabilities that competitors leverage. Business cases for IT projects should explicitly connect technology investments to business outcomes with defined success metrics. Regular reviews ensure alignment persists as business priorities evolve.
B is incorrect because hardware refresh cycles are tactical IT operations that can be managed independently of strategic alignment. While refresh timing affects operational efficiency, it does not represent the fundamental risk of IT not supporting business strategy.
C is incorrect because software licensing audit frequency is compliance matter that does not indicate strategic misalignment. Organizations must maintain license compliance regardless of strategic alignment, and audit frequency has minimal business impact.
D is incorrect because IT staff training budgets represent investment in capability development that can be managed within overall IT budget. Training budget reductions may affect service delivery but do not constitute primary risk of strategic misalignment.
Question 32
An auditor is reviewing a software development project and finds that requirements documentation is incomplete. What is the PRIMARY risk associated with this deficiency?
A) System may not meet user needs resulting in rework and project failure
B) Development tools may not be selected appropriately
C) Project team meetings may take longer than scheduled
D) Software testing may begin earlier than planned
Answer: A
Explanation:
Requirements definition is foundational phase in software development establishing what system must accomplish to satisfy business needs and user expectations. Incomplete requirements documentation creates significant project risk because development proceeds without clear understanding of desired outcomes leading to systems that do not meet user needs, requiring expensive rework, and potentially failing completely. Requirements documentation should comprehensively describe functional requirements specifying what system must do, non-functional requirements defining performance, security, and usability expectations, user interface requirements, integration requirements with existing systems, data requirements, and acceptance criteria defining successful implementation. When requirements are incomplete, developers make assumptions that may not align with actual needs, important functionality may be overlooked, and stakeholder expectations may not be met. Incomplete requirements cause scope creep as missing items surface during development requiring changes, testing challenges because acceptance criteria are undefined, user dissatisfaction when delivered system does not match expectations, and project delays as requirements are clarified mid-development. Requirements should involve business stakeholders ensuring IT understands business processes and constraints. Formal requirements review and approval establish shared understanding before development begins. Agile methodologies address requirements through iterative refinement but still require sufficient initial definition to guide development. Requirements traceability matrices link requirements through design, development, and testing ensuring all requirements are implemented and verified. Cost of fixing requirements defects increases dramatically as projects progress making upfront requirements investment cost-effective.
B is incorrect because development tool selection is technical decision that can be made based on available information even if requirements are incomplete. Tool selection does not represent primary project risk compared to building wrong system.
C is incorrect because project team meeting duration is project management efficiency concern that does not indicate significant project risk. Meeting length can be managed through facilitation while incomplete requirements threaten project success.
D is incorrect because testing beginning earlier than planned would generally be positive occurrence indicating project ahead of schedule. Early testing does not represent risk, though testing without complete requirements would be ineffective.
Question 33
During a network security audit, an auditor discovers that the organization does not use network segmentation. What is the PRIMARY security risk of this finding?
A) Compromised system could enable lateral movement across entire network
B) Network cable costs may be higher than necessary
C) Network switch configurations may be complex
D) Wireless access points may require additional planning
Answer: A
Explanation:
Network segmentation divides networks into logical or physical segments limiting communication between segments and containing security incidents to isolated areas. Flat networks without segmentation allow unrestricted communication between all systems creating environment where attackers who compromise any system can easily move laterally across the entire network accessing additional systems and data. The primary risk is that single compromised endpoint enables attacker to reach crown jewels like database servers, financial systems, or intellectual property repositories. Modern attacks often begin with phishing or malware on user workstations then pivot to valuable systems once initial foothold is established. Segmentation limits blast radius by creating security zones with different trust levels such as separating user networks from server networks, isolating public-facing systems from internal systems, separating development from production environments, and creating isolated segments for sensitive data. Firewalls or access control lists between segments enforce security policies permitting only necessary traffic while blocking unauthorized access attempts. Network segmentation supports defense in depth where multiple security layers protect assets making compromise significantly more difficult. Zero trust architecture extends segmentation principles assuming breach and requiring verification for every access request. Micro-segmentation applies fine-grained controls to individual workloads. VLANs provide basic segmentation at layer 2 while firewalls enforce layer 3 and 4 policies. Software-defined networking enables dynamic segmentation adapting to changing requirements. Organizations should design segmentation based on data classification, business processes, and regulatory requirements.
B is incorrect because network cable costs are infrastructure expenses that do not represent significant security risk. While cost management is important for budget control, cabling costs are negligible compared to security incident potential costs.
C is incorrect because network switch configuration complexity is operational consideration that skilled network administrators can manage. Configuration complexity is not security risk and properly designed segmentation actually simplifies security management.
D is incorrect because wireless access point planning is deployment consideration unrelated to network segmentation security benefits. Wireless planning can be conducted independently of segmentation decisions.
Question 34
An organization implements a data loss prevention solution. What should be the auditor’s PRIMARY concern regarding DLP effectiveness?
A) Accuracy of data classification and policy definitions to prevent false positives
B) DLP software licensing costs
C) DLP vendor market share
D) DLP system hardware specifications
Answer: A
Explanation:
Data loss prevention solutions monitor and control data movement preventing unauthorized exfiltration of sensitive information through email, web uploads, removable media, or other channels. DLP effectiveness depends fundamentally on accurate data classification identifying what data needs protection and precisely defined policies specifying what constitutes unauthorized disclosure. The primary concern is achieving balance between security and usability where overly broad policies generate excessive false positives overwhelming security teams and frustrating users while overly narrow policies fail to protect sensitive data. Data classification provides foundation for DLP by tagging sensitive information according to confidentiality levels such as public, internal, confidential, and restricted. Classification can be manual where users assign classifications, automated based on content inspection patterns like credit card numbers or social security numbers, or hybrid combining automated detection with user validation. DLP policies define permitted and prohibited data movements based on classification, user roles, destinations, and context. Effective policies consider business requirements permitting necessary data flows while preventing unauthorized disclosures. False positive reduction requires policy tuning through iterative refinement where security teams review alerts, identify legitimate activities incorrectly flagged, and adjust policies accordingly. User education ensures users understand classification requirements and DLP enforcement. Exception processes handle legitimate edge cases without creating security gaps. DLP deployment should be phased starting with monitoring mode to baseline normal activities before enforcement to avoid business disruption.
B is incorrect because DLP software licensing costs are procurement considerations that do not determine system effectiveness. Cost management is important for budget control but does not indicate whether DLP successfully prevents data loss.
C is incorrect because DLP vendor market share may indicate product maturity and support availability but does not determine whether implementation effectively protects organizational data. Smaller vendors may provide excellent solutions for specific needs.
D is incorrect because DLP system hardware specifications affect performance and scalability but do not determine whether policies effectively identify and prevent unauthorized data disclosure. Adequate hardware is necessary but not sufficient for effective data protection.
Question 35
During an audit of incident response procedures, an auditor finds that the organization does not have a documented incident response plan. What is the PRIMARY risk of this deficiency?
A) Inconsistent and delayed response to security incidents increasing damage
B) Help desk ticket resolution times may vary
C) Employee onboarding processes may be inefficient
D) Software deployment schedules may be unpredictable
Answer: A
Explanation:
Incident response plans provide structured approach to detecting, analyzing, containing, eradicating, and recovering from security incidents. Without documented plans, organizations respond to incidents in ad hoc manner causing inconsistent handling, delayed response, increased damage from uncontrolled incidents, and prolonged recovery times. The primary risk is that security incidents cause greater damage and longer disruption than necessary because responders lack defined procedures, clear roles, and established communication channels. Documented incident response plans define incident classification criteria determining severity levels, escalation procedures specifying when to engage management or external parties, roles and responsibilities of incident response team members, communication protocols for internal and external stakeholders, technical procedures for evidence preservation and system recovery, and post-incident review processes for continuous improvement. Plans should address various incident types including malware infections, unauthorized access, denial of service attacks, data breaches, and insider threats. Effective incident response requires coordination across multiple teams including IT operations, security, legal, communications, and management. Without plans, critical steps like evidence preservation may be missed compromising investigations, notification requirements may not be met violating regulatory obligations, and affected systems may be improperly handled destroying forensic evidence. Plans should be tested through tabletop exercises and simulations identifying gaps and building team familiarity with procedures. Incident response retainers with external forensics firms provide expert assistance when internal capabilities are insufficient. Regular plan updates ensure procedures remain current as infrastructure evolves.
B is incorrect because help desk ticket resolution times are operational efficiency metrics for routine support issues, not security incidents. Ticket resolution variability does not represent the critical risk of inadequate security incident response.
C is incorrect because employee onboarding process efficiency is human resources operational concern unrelated to security incident response. While important for employee experience, onboarding does not relate to incident management risks.
D is incorrect because software deployment schedule predictability is change management consideration that does not relate to incident response capabilities. Deployment scheduling can be managed independently of incident response planning.
Question 36
An auditor reviews an organization’s third-party vendor risk management process and finds that security assessments are not performed before onboarding new vendors. What is the PRIMARY risk?
A) Vendors with inadequate security controls could compromise organizational data
B) Vendor contract negotiation may take longer
C) Vendor invoice processing may be delayed
D) Vendor product demonstrations may require more time
Answer: A
Explanation:
Third-party vendors increasingly handle, process, or store sensitive organizational data creating extended attack surface beyond direct organizational control. When organizations fail to assess vendor security before onboarding, they risk entrusting data to vendors with inadequate security controls potentially leading to data breaches, compliance violations, and reputational damage. The primary risk is that vendors with weak security become breach vectors compromising organizational data even when organization maintains strong internal controls. High-profile breaches frequently involve third-party vendors lacking appropriate security capabilities. Vendor risk management should include pre-contract security assessment evaluating vendor security posture through questionnaires, security certifications review including SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, or industry-specific attestations, on-site assessments for high-risk vendors, contractual security requirements specifying minimum security controls, ongoing monitoring through periodic reassessment, and incident response coordination. Risk assessment should be scaled to vendor criticality and data sensitivity where vendors processing highly sensitive data receive thorough assessment while vendors with minimal data access receive lighter evaluation. Critical considerations include data handling practices, access controls, encryption implementation, incident response capabilities, business continuity planning, and subcontractor management. Contract terms should include right to audit provisions, security incident notification requirements, data protection obligations, and liability allocation for breaches. Organizations should maintain vendor inventory tracking which vendors have access to what data. Fourth-party risk emerges when vendors use subcontractors requiring vendor contracts to flow down security requirements.
B is incorrect because while vendor contract negotiation duration may increase with security assessment, this represents acceptable investment in risk management rather than negative outcome. Extended negotiation is preferable to onboarding insecure vendors.
C is incorrect because vendor invoice processing delays are accounts payable operational matters unrelated to security risk assessment. Invoice timing does not affect organizational security posture or vendor security adequacy.
D is incorrect because product demonstration duration is sales process consideration that does not relate to security risk. Demonstration time has no bearing on vendor security controls or data protection capabilities.
Question 37
During a review of database security, an auditor finds that production database backups are not encrypted. What is the PRIMARY concern with this practice?
A) Backup media theft or loss could expose sensitive data without encryption protection
B) Database query performance may be impacted
C) Backup storage costs may increase over time
D) Database administrator workload may vary
Answer: A
Explanation:
Database backups contain complete copies of production data including all sensitive information such as customer records, financial data, intellectual property, and personal information. When backups are unencrypted, this data is stored in plain text on backup media creating significant exposure if media is lost, stolen, or accessed by unauthorized parties. The primary concern is that backup media theft or loss results in data breach exposing all information contained in backups without any cryptographic protection preventing unauthorized access. Physical backup media like tapes or external drives are particularly vulnerable during transport to off-site storage facilities, while in storage at third-party facilities, or when being disposed of at end of life. Unencrypted backups also create risk from insider threats where individuals with physical access to backup storage can extract sensitive data. Compliance requirements like PCI DSS, HIPAA, and GDPR mandate encryption for sensitive data at rest including backups. Organizations experiencing backup media loss without encryption face mandatory breach notification, regulatory penalties, litigation, and reputational damage. Backup encryption should use strong algorithms with proper key management ensuring encryption keys are stored separately from encrypted backups. Key escrow procedures enable data recovery if primary keys are lost. Encryption can occur at backup software level encrypting data during backup process, storage level using encrypted storage systems, or media level using self-encrypting drives. Performance impact of encryption is generally minimal with modern encryption hardware acceleration. Organizations should test backup restoration with encryption ensuring recovery procedures work correctly.
B is incorrect because database query performance relates to production database operations, not backup encryption. Backups are separate copies not involved in transaction processing, so backup encryption does not affect production query performance.
C is incorrect because while backup storage costs may increase over time as data volumes grow, this is storage capacity planning issue unrelated to encryption. Encrypted and unencrypted backups consume similar storage space, so encryption does not significantly impact costs.
D is incorrect because database administrator workload variation is operational staffing consideration that does not represent the security risk of unencrypted backups. Workload management can be addressed through staffing while data exposure requires encryption protection.
Question 38
An organization implements robotic process automation for finance processes. What should be the auditor’s PRIMARY concern regarding RPA security?
A) RPA bot credentials and access controls preventing unauthorized automation
B) RPA software licensing compliance
C) RPA implementation project timelines
D) RPA vendor selection criteria
Answer: A
Explanation:
Robotic process automation uses software bots to perform repetitive tasks by mimicking human user interactions with applications. RPA bots require credentials to authenticate to systems and permissions to execute business processes creating security concerns around bot credential management and access control. The primary concern is ensuring RPA bot credentials are properly secured and bot access is appropriately controlled preventing unauthorized automation, privilege abuse, or credential compromise. RPA bots often require elevated privileges to access multiple systems and perform various operations creating attractive targets for attackers. Bot credentials should never be hardcoded in scripts or stored in plain text. Credential management solutions specifically designed for RPA provide secure storage, rotation, and access logging. Bot access should follow least privilege principles granting only permissions necessary for specific automated processes. Many organizations mistakenly treat bots as trusted entities providing excessive access without proper controls. Bot activities should be logged comprehensively enabling audit trails distinguishing bot actions from human actions. Segregation of duties principles apply where bots should not have combined privileges that would violate controls if held by human users. Bot development and production environments should be separated with controlled promotion processes. Change management ensures bot script modifications receive appropriate review and approval. Bot monitoring detects anomalous behavior indicating compromise or misconfiguration. Organizations should inventory all bots tracking what systems they access and what processes they automate. Bot retirement procedures ensure credentials are revoked when automation is decommissioned.
B is incorrect because RPA software licensing compliance is procurement and contract management concern that does not represent primary security risk. License compliance can be managed through software asset management independent of security controls.
C is incorrect because RPA implementation project timelines are project management considerations affecting delivery dates but not representing security risks. Timeline management is important for project success but does not address security control requirements.
D is incorrect because RPA vendor selection criteria are procurement decision factors that should include security evaluation but are not ongoing security concerns after implementation. Vendor selection precedes the operational security risks of bot credential and access management.
Question 39
During an audit of change management processes, an auditor finds that emergency changes are implemented without approval. What is the PRIMARY risk of this practice?
A) Unauthorized or inadequately tested changes could cause system outages or security incidents
B) Change management documentation may become outdated
C) IT service desk ticket volumes may fluctuate
D) Change advisory board meetings may be rescheduled
Answer: A
Explanation:
Change management processes ensure system modifications are properly evaluated, approved, tested, and documented before implementation reducing risk of changes causing disruptions or security vulnerabilities. Emergency changes occur during urgent situations requiring rapid response to resolve critical incidents or security threats. However, bypassing approval processes even for emergencies creates risk that unauthorized or inadequately tested changes are implemented causing additional problems, system outages, or security incidents that worsen the original situation. The primary risk is that well-intentioned but flawed emergency changes cause greater damage than the problems they attempt to solve. Without proper evaluation, emergency changes may have unintended consequences, conflict with existing configurations, or introduce security vulnerabilities. Changes implemented by single individuals without peer review are prone to errors especially under pressure of emergency situations. Proper emergency change procedures should include expedited approval from authorized managers even if after-hours, minimal testing appropriate to urgency, comprehensive documentation of changes made, immediate communication to affected teams, and mandatory post-implementation review. Post-implementation review should occur within defined timeframe after emergency change examining whether change achieved intended purpose, whether change caused any unintended effects, whether change followed appropriate procedures, and what process improvements could prevent similar emergencies. Organizations should define what constitutes true emergency versus changes that can follow standard processes. Audit trails must capture emergency changes with rationale, approver, and timing.
B is incorrect because while change management documentation may become outdated without proper recording of emergency changes, documentation currency is less critical than the immediate risks of implementing problematic changes that cause outages or security issues.
C is incorrect because IT service desk ticket volumes are operational metrics that naturally fluctuate based on various factors. Ticket volume changes are not significant risks compared to system outages or security incidents from inadequate change management.
D is incorrect because change advisory board meeting rescheduling is administrative matter that does not represent significant risk. Meeting timing can be adjusted as needed while emergency change risks require structured controls.
Question 40
An auditor is reviewing an organization’s encryption key management practices and finds that encryption keys are stored on the same servers as encrypted data. What is the PRIMARY risk of this configuration?
A) Compromise of server provides access to both encrypted data and decryption keys
B) Encryption algorithm strength may be insufficient
C) Key rotation procedures may be manual
D) Encryption performance may not meet requirements
Answer: A
Explanation:
Encryption key management is critical component of data protection because encryption security depends entirely on key secrecy. Storing encryption keys on the same systems as encrypted data fundamentally undermines encryption protection because attackers who compromise systems gain access to both encrypted data and the keys necessary to decrypt it. The primary risk is that single system compromise defeats encryption entirely making it equivalent to storing data unencrypted. Encryption keys should be stored separately from encrypted data using key management systems, hardware security modules, or key management services specifically designed for secure key storage. Physical and logical separation ensures attackers must compromise multiple independent systems to access encrypted data. HSMs provide tamper-resistant hardware storing keys with built-in protection against extraction. Cloud key management services like AWS KMS, Azure Key Vault, or Google Cloud KMS provide managed key storage with separation from encrypted data. Key hierarchy designs use key encryption keys to encrypt data encryption keys adding additional protection layers. Access to encryption keys should be restricted to minimal necessary principals with comprehensive audit logging. Keys stored in configuration files, scripts, or databases sharing infrastructure with encrypted data violate separation principles. Environment variables or application memory also fail to provide adequate separation. Organizations should evaluate whether encryption keys could be accessed by same attack vectors that could access encrypted data. Encryption at rest loses value if keys are easily accessible alongside data.
B is incorrect because encryption algorithm strength is separate consideration from key management. Strong algorithms like AES-256 can be used with poor key management practices. Algorithm selection does not address the risk of keys stored with encrypted data.
C is incorrect because manual key rotation procedures represent operational efficiency issue that can exist independently of key storage location. While automated rotation is preferable, manual rotation is acceptable if properly executed. Key location is more critical than rotation automation.
D is incorrect because encryption performance depends on algorithm efficiency, hardware capabilities, and implementation quality, not key storage location. Key storage separation does not impact encryption or decryption performance since keys are accessed independently of data processing.
