Visit here for our full Google Professional Data Engineer exam dumps and practice test questions.
Question 161
Your company is migrating its data warehouse to BigQuery. You need to ensure that the data is encrypted both at rest and in transit. What should you do?
A) Enable default encryption in BigQuery, as it automatically encrypts data at rest and in transit
B) Create a custom encryption key in Cloud KMS and configure BigQuery to use it for encryption at rest only
C) Use Cloud VPN to encrypt data in transit and rely on BigQuery’s default encryption for data at rest
D) Disable default encryption and implement application-level encryption before loading data into BigQuery
Answer: A
Explanation:
BigQuery automatically provides robust encryption for data security, making option A the correct answer. Google Cloud Platform implements encryption by default for all data stored in BigQuery without requiring any additional configuration from users. This built-in security feature ensures that all data is encrypted at rest using Google-managed encryption keys, and all data transmitted to and from BigQuery is encrypted in transit using Transport Layer Security (TLS). When data is written to BigQuery, it is automatically encrypted before being written to disk using AES-256 encryption, which is an industry-standard encryption algorithm. The encryption keys are managed by Google and are automatically rotated on a regular schedule. For data in transit, BigQuery uses TLS to encrypt all communication between clients and BigQuery services, including data being loaded, query results being returned, and any API calls made to BigQuery. Option B is incorrect because while you can use customer-managed encryption keys (CMEK) with Cloud KMS for additional control, it is not necessary to meet the basic requirement of encrypting data at rest and in transit. BigQuery’s default encryption already handles both requirements effectively. Option C is incorrect because Cloud VPN is not necessary for encrypting data in transit to BigQuery. TLS encryption is already enabled by default for all BigQuery communications. Option D is incorrect and represents a poor security practice, as disabling default encryption would reduce security rather than enhance it.
Question 162
You are designing a real-time analytics pipeline that ingests streaming data from IoT devices. The data needs to be processed and stored in BigQuery for analysis. Which Google Cloud services should you use?
A) Cloud Storage, Dataflow, and BigQuery
B) Pub/Sub, Dataflow, and BigQuery
C) Cloud Functions, Cloud Storage, and BigQuery
D) Dataproc, Cloud SQL, and BigQuery
Answer: B
Explanation:
For real-time streaming analytics pipelines involving IoT devices, the combination of Pub/Sub, Dataflow, and BigQuery represents the optimal architecture, making option B the correct answer. Cloud Pub/Sub serves as the ingestion layer for streaming data from IoT devices, handling millions of messages per second with low latency. It acts as a buffer between data producers (IoT devices) and data consumers, ensuring that no data is lost even if downstream systems experience temporary issues. Dataflow is Google Cloud’s fully managed stream and batch data processing service based on Apache Beam that processes the streaming data from Pub/Sub in real-time, performing transformations, aggregations, enrichment, and filtering as needed. It automatically scales resources based on data volume without manual intervention. BigQuery serves as the final destination for the processed data, providing a scalable data warehouse for analysis. Its streaming insert capability allows Dataflow to write data directly to BigQuery tables in near real-time. Option A is incorrect because Cloud Storage is designed for batch processing rather than real-time streaming, introducing latency unsuitable for real-time analytics. Option C is incorrect because Cloud Functions is not optimized for continuous high-volume streaming data processing that IoT scenarios require. Option D is incorrect because Dataproc is primarily designed for batch processing using Hadoop and Spark clusters, and Cloud SQL is not optimized for high-volume analytics workloads.
Question 163
Your organization needs to implement a data lake on Google Cloud Platform. The data lake must support both structured and unstructured data, and provide cost-effective long-term storage. What should you use?
A) BigQuery for all data types with automatic data lifecycle management
B) Cloud Storage with appropriate storage classes based on access patterns
C) Cloud SQL with large instance sizes and automated backups
D) Persistent Disk attached to Compute Engine instances for maximum performance
Answer: B
Explanation:
Cloud Storage with appropriate storage classes is the ideal solution for implementing a data lake on Google Cloud Platform, making option B the correct answer. Cloud Storage is specifically designed to handle both structured and unstructured data at any scale while providing flexible, cost-effective storage options based on access frequency and retention requirements. A data lake architecture requires a storage system that can accommodate diverse data types including raw files, logs, images, videos, CSV files, JSON documents, and other formats without requiring predefined schemas. Cloud Storage excels because it is an object storage service that can store any type of data in its native format. Cloud Storage offers multiple storage classes: Standard storage for frequently accessed data, Nearline storage for data accessed less than once per month, Coldline storage for data accessed less than once per quarter, and Archive storage for long-term retention of data accessed less than once per year. Organizations can implement lifecycle management policies that automatically transition objects between storage classes based on age or access patterns, ensuring optimal cost efficiency. Option A is incorrect because while BigQuery is excellent for structured data analytics, it requires data to be loaded into tables with defined schemas, making it less suitable for storing unstructured data in raw format. Option C is incorrect because Cloud SQL is a managed relational database service designed for transactional workloads, not for the diverse data types and massive scale typical of data lakes. Option D is incorrect because Persistent Disk is block storage not designed for data lake architectures and would be significantly more expensive.
Question 164
You need to load 10 TB of historical data from on-premises systems into BigQuery. The data transfer must be completed within 24 hours, and your network bandwidth is limited. What is the most efficient approach?
A) Use the BigQuery Data Transfer Service to schedule incremental data loads
B) Use the Transfer Appliance to physically ship the data to Google Cloud
C) Split the data into smaller files and upload them using gsutil with parallel composite uploads
D) Use Cloud VPN to establish a secure connection and transfer data using the bq load command
Answer: B
Explanation:
Using the Transfer Appliance to physically ship data is the most efficient approach for large data migrations with bandwidth constraints, making option B the correct answer. The Transfer Appliance is a high-capacity storage server provided by Google that you rack in your datacenter, load with data, and ship back to Google for upload to Cloud Storage. From there, the data can be easily loaded into BigQuery. This solution is specifically designed for transferring large datasets (from hundreds of terabytes to petabytes) when network bandwidth is insufficient or would take too long. With 10 TB of data and a 24-hour deadline, calculating the required bandwidth reveals the challenge. To transfer 10 TB in 24 hours requires approximately 925 Mbps of sustained bandwidth, which many organizations don’t have available for continuous data transfer. Even if sufficient bandwidth exists, consuming it for 24 hours could impact normal business operations. The Transfer Appliance bypasses these network limitations entirely by using physical transport, which is often faster and more reliable for large datasets. Option A is incorrect because the BigQuery Data Transfer Service is designed for scheduling regular data transfers from supported sources like Google Marketing Platform, Google Ads, and YouTube, not for one-time large-scale historical data migrations. Option C is incorrect because while gsutil with parallel uploads can improve transfer speeds, it still relies on network bandwidth, which the question states is limited and may not support transferring 10 TB within 24 hours. Option D is incorrect because Cloud VPN, while providing secure connectivity, does not solve the fundamental bandwidth limitation problem and would still require sufficient network capacity to transfer 10 TB in 24 hours.
Question 165
Your data pipeline processes customer transaction data and loads it into BigQuery. You need to ensure that personally identifiable information (PII) is de-identified before storage. What should you do?
A) Use Cloud Data Loss Prevention (DLP) API with Dataflow to detect and de-identify PII during processing
B) Store all data in BigQuery and use row-level security to restrict access to PII fields
C) Encrypt PII fields using client-side encryption before loading data into BigQuery
D) Use BigQuery column-level security to hide PII fields from unauthorized users
Answer: A
Explanation:
Using Cloud Data Loss Prevention (DLP) API with Dataflow to detect and de-identify PII during processing is the correct approach, making option A the right answer. Cloud DLP is a fully managed service designed specifically to discover, classify, and protect sensitive data including personally identifiable information. When integrated into a Dataflow pipeline, Cloud DLP can automatically detect various types of PII such as names, email addresses, phone numbers, credit card numbers, and social security numbers in real-time as data flows through the pipeline. The DLP API provides multiple de-identification techniques including masking, tokenization, format-preserving encryption, and generalization, allowing you to transform sensitive data before it reaches BigQuery. This approach ensures that PII never exists in its raw form in BigQuery, providing defense-in-depth security. By de-identifying data during the processing phase in Dataflow, you maintain data utility for analytics while protecting privacy. The transformed data can still be used for business intelligence and reporting without exposing actual PII values. Option B is incorrect because row-level security controls who can access specific rows of data but does not de-identify or transform PII. The sensitive data still exists in BigQuery in its original form, creating privacy and compliance risks. Option C is incorrect because client-side encryption before loading makes the data unusable for querying and analytics in BigQuery, as BigQuery cannot process encrypted values effectively for aggregations, joins, or filtering operations. Option D is incorrect because column-level security, like row-level security, only controls access permissions but does not de-identify the data, meaning PII still exists in BigQuery in plaintext form.
Question 166
You are building a machine learning model using data stored in BigQuery. The dataset contains 500 million rows, and you need to perform feature engineering. What is the most efficient approach?
A) Export all data to Cloud Storage, process it using Dataproc with Spark, then import results back to BigQuery
B) Use BigQuery ML to perform feature engineering directly within BigQuery using SQL
C) Load all data into a Compute Engine instance with high memory and process using pandas
D) Use Dataflow to read from BigQuery, perform transformations, and write results to Cloud Storage
Answer: B
Explanation:
Using BigQuery ML to perform feature engineering directly within BigQuery using SQL is the most efficient approach, making option B the correct answer. BigQuery ML allows you to create and execute machine learning models using standard SQL queries, eliminating the need to move data out of BigQuery. For feature engineering on 500 million rows, this approach provides significant advantages in terms of performance, cost, and simplicity. BigQuery’s distributed architecture can process massive datasets efficiently, performing transformations, aggregations, and feature creation at scale without requiring data movement. When data remains in BigQuery throughout the feature engineering process, you avoid the time, cost, and complexity associated with exporting, processing, and re-importing large datasets. BigQuery SQL supports numerous functions for feature engineering including mathematical operations, string manipulations, date/time transformations, window functions, and array operations. You can create derived features, normalize data, handle missing values, encode categorical variables, and perform binning operations all within SQL. BigQuery ML also provides built-in preprocessing functions like ML.STANDARD_SCALER, ML.MIN_MAX_SCALER, and ML.BUCKETIZE specifically designed for feature engineering in machine learning workflows. Option A is incorrect because exporting 500 million rows to Cloud Storage, processing with Dataproc, and importing back introduces significant overhead in terms of time, cost, and complexity, making it inefficient compared to in-place processing. Option C is incorrect because loading 500 million rows into a single Compute Engine instance would require massive memory resources, and pandas is not designed for distributed processing of datasets this large, making it impractical and expensive. Option D is incorrect because while Dataflow can handle the transformations, writing results to Cloud Storage instead of BigQuery adds an extra step and doesn’t directly support the machine learning workflow stated in the question.
Question 167
Your company’s data warehouse in BigQuery contains sales data partitioned by date. Query performance has degraded as the dataset has grown. What should you do to improve query performance?
A) Create clustered tables based on frequently filtered columns in addition to partitioning
B) Increase the number of slots allocated to your BigQuery project
C) Denormalize all tables to eliminate JOIN operations
D) Export data to Cloud Bigtable for faster query performance
Answer: A
Explanation:
Creating clustered tables based on frequently filtered columns in addition to partitioning is the most effective approach to improve query performance, making option A the correct answer. BigQuery clustering organizes data within partitions based on the values of one or more specified columns, storing rows with similar values physically close together. When combined with partitioning, clustering provides a two-tier data organization strategy that significantly reduces the amount of data scanned during query execution. Partitioning divides tables into segments based on a date or timestamp column, allowing queries to prune entire partitions that don’t match filter conditions. Clustering then sorts data within each partition based on specified clustering columns, enabling BigQuery to skip blocks of data that don’t contain relevant values. This is particularly effective when queries filter or aggregate on specific columns such as customer ID, product category, region, or status. For example, if your sales data is partitioned by date and clustered by region and product category, queries filtering on these dimensions will scan dramatically less data, improving both performance and cost. Clustering is especially beneficial for high-cardinality columns that are frequently used in WHERE clauses, JOIN conditions, or GROUP BY operations. Option B is incorrect because while increasing slots can improve concurrency and overall throughput, it doesn’t address the fundamental issue of scanning excessive data, and would significantly increase costs without optimizing query efficiency. Option C is incorrect because denormalization eliminates joins but increases storage requirements, creates data redundancy, complicates updates, and may actually degrade performance for certain query patterns while making maintenance more difficult. Option D is incorrect because Cloud Bigtable is designed for low-latency key-value lookups and time-series data, not for the complex analytical queries typical of data warehouse workloads that BigQuery handles efficiently.
Question 168
You need to implement a disaster recovery strategy for your BigQuery datasets. The recovery point objective (RPO) is 24 hours, and the recovery time objective (RTO) is 4 hours. What should you do?
A) Schedule daily exports of BigQuery tables to Cloud Storage in a different region using scheduled queries
B) Enable BigQuery continuous backup and configure cross-region replication
C) Manually create snapshots of all tables every 24 hours and store them in multiple regions
D) Use BigQuery Data Transfer Service to copy data to another BigQuery dataset in a different region daily
Answer: A
Explanation:
Scheduling daily exports of BigQuery tables to Cloud Storage in a different region using scheduled queries is the most appropriate solution for the stated disaster recovery requirements, making option A the correct answer. This approach directly meets both the 24-hour RPO and 4-hour RTO objectives while providing cost-effective and reliable disaster recovery capabilities. Scheduled queries in BigQuery can automatically export table data to Cloud Storage on a daily basis, ensuring that you always have a backup that is no more than 24 hours old, which satisfies the RPO requirement. By storing these exports in Cloud Storage in a different geographic region than your primary BigQuery dataset, you protect against regional failures. Cloud Storage provides high durability and availability, ensuring that backup data remains accessible even if the primary region experiences an outage. In a disaster recovery scenario, you can reload data from Cloud Storage into BigQuery within a few hours, easily meeting the 4-hour RTO requirement. BigQuery’s load jobs are highly efficient and can import large datasets quickly, especially when using formats like Avro or Parquet that are optimized for analytics workloads. Option B is incorrect because BigQuery does not offer a native continuous backup feature with cross-region replication as described. While BigQuery automatically maintains data redundancy within a region, cross-region replication for disaster recovery requires explicit configuration using other methods. Option C is incorrect because BigQuery does not have a native snapshot feature like some database systems, and manual processes are error-prone, difficult to maintain, and do not scale well. Option D is incorrect because the BigQuery Data Transfer Service is primarily designed for ingesting data from external sources like Google Marketing Platform, Google Ads, and other SaaS applications, not for copying data between BigQuery datasets for disaster recovery purposes.
Question 169
Your organization uses Dataflow pipelines to process streaming data. You need to monitor pipeline performance and set up alerts for job failures. What should you do?
A) Use Cloud Monitoring to create custom dashboards and configure alerting policies based on Dataflow metrics
B) Export Dataflow logs to BigQuery and create scheduled queries to check for errors
C) Use Cloud Logging to manually review logs daily for any error messages
D) Implement custom monitoring code within the Dataflow pipeline to send notifications
Answer: A
Explanation:
Using Cloud Monitoring to create custom dashboards and configure alerting policies based on Dataflow metrics is the correct approach, making option A the right answer. Cloud Monitoring is Google Cloud’s comprehensive monitoring solution that provides native integration with Dataflow, automatically collecting performance metrics without requiring any code changes to your pipelines. Dataflow automatically emits metrics to Cloud Monitoring including system lag, data freshness, element counts, CPU utilization, throughput, and error rates. These metrics provide visibility into pipeline health and performance, allowing you to identify bottlenecks, resource constraints, and processing delays. Cloud Monitoring’s dashboard feature allows you to create customized visualizations that display the most relevant metrics for your use case, providing real-time visibility into pipeline operations. The alerting policies feature enables you to define conditions that trigger notifications when metrics exceed thresholds or anomalies are detected. For example, you can create alerts for job failures, high system lag indicating processing delays, low throughput suggesting performance issues, or elevated error rates indicating data quality problems. Alerts can be sent through multiple channels including email, SMS, Slack, PagerDuty, or webhooks, ensuring that the right team members are notified immediately when issues occur. Option B is incorrect because while exporting logs to BigQuery and running scheduled queries can provide historical analysis, it introduces significant delay in detecting issues and does not provide real-time monitoring or immediate alerting capabilities required for operational monitoring. Option C is incorrect because manual log review is time-consuming, error-prone, reactive rather than proactive, and does not scale effectively as the number of pipelines grows. Option D is incorrect because implementing custom monitoring code within pipelines adds complexity, maintenance burden, and potential points of failure, while duplicating functionality already provided by Cloud Monitoring.
Question 170
You are designing a data pipeline that needs to process files as soon as they are uploaded to Cloud Storage. The processing should be event-driven and serverless. Which combination of services should you use?
A) Cloud Storage notifications to Pub/Sub, Cloud Functions to trigger Dataflow jobs
B) Scheduled Cloud Scheduler to check Cloud Storage, Compute Engine to process files
C) Cloud Storage Transfer Service to move files, Dataproc to process them
D) Cloud Composer to poll Cloud Storage, Dataflow to process files
Answer: A
Explanation:
Using Cloud Storage notifications to Pub/Sub combined with Cloud Functions to trigger Dataflow jobs provides the ideal event-driven, serverless architecture, making option A the correct answer. This solution fully meets the requirements for immediate file processing without managing infrastructure. Cloud Storage can be configured to send notifications to Pub/Sub whenever specific events occur, such as objects being created, deleted, or updated. These notifications are sent immediately when files are uploaded, enabling true event-driven processing without polling or delays. Pub/Sub acts as a reliable messaging layer that decouples the event source from the processing logic, providing durability and at-least-once delivery guarantees. Cloud Functions subscribes to the Pub/Sub topic and is automatically triggered when new messages arrive. As a serverless compute platform, Cloud Functions scales automatically from zero to handle any number of concurrent file uploads without requiring capacity planning or infrastructure management. The Cloud Function can examine the notification metadata to determine the file location and characteristics, then programmatically start a Dataflow job to process the specific file. Dataflow provides the scalable, distributed processing capability needed for complex data transformations, while Cloud Functions handles the lightweight orchestration logic. This architecture is cost-effective because you only pay for actual usage with no idle resources. Option B is incorrect because scheduled polling introduces delays between file uploads and processing, violating the requirement for immediate processing, and Compute Engine requires managing virtual machines, which contradicts the serverless requirement. Option C is incorrect because the Cloud Storage Transfer Service is designed for bulk data transfers between storage systems, not for event-driven processing of individual files, and Dataproc requires managing cluster infrastructure. Option D is incorrect because while Cloud Composer is excellent for workflow orchestration, polling Cloud Storage introduces delays and is less efficient than event-driven notifications.
Question 171
Your BigQuery dataset contains customer purchase history with 10 billion rows. You need to grant access to the marketing team to query data for customers in specific regions without exposing data from other regions. What is the most secure approach?
A) Create separate tables for each region and grant table-level permissions to the marketing team
B) Use authorized views that filter data based on region and grant access to the views instead of the base table
C) Create a new dataset with data from specific regions and grant dataset-level permissions
D) Use BigQuery column-level security to hide the region column from unauthorized users
Answer: B
Explanation:
Using authorized views that filter data based on region and grant access to the views instead of the base table is the most secure and efficient approach, making option B the correct answer. Authorized views in BigQuery provide a powerful security mechanism that allows you to share query results with specific users or groups without granting them access to the underlying tables. This implements the principle of least privilege by ensuring users can only access the data they need. An authorized view is a view that has been granted access to query specific tables, while users are granted permission to query the view without having direct access to the base tables. You can create views with WHERE clauses that filter data based on region, ensuring that when the marketing team queries the view, they only see data for their authorized regions. This approach maintains a single source of truth with one comprehensive table containing all data, while providing granular access control through views. The base table remains secure and inaccessible to the marketing team, preventing them from modifying the view logic or accessing filtered data. Authorized views also simplify maintenance because access control logic is centralized in the view definition rather than duplicated across multiple tables. Option A is incorrect because creating separate tables for each region introduces significant data management complexity, increases storage costs due to duplication, makes schema changes more difficult, and creates consistency challenges when data needs to be updated. Option C is incorrect because copying data to a new dataset creates data duplication with similar problems as option A, increases storage costs, creates potential data inconsistency, and requires ongoing synchronization between datasets. Option D is incorrect because column-level security controls which columns users can see, but doesn’t filter which rows they can access, so the marketing team would still be able to query customer data from all regions.
Question 172
You have a Dataflow pipeline that processes streaming data from Pub/Sub. The pipeline occasionally experiences high latency during peak hours. What should you do to improve performance?
A) Enable autoscaling in Dataflow and configure maximum worker instances based on expected peak load
B) Increase the number of Pub/Sub subscriptions to distribute the load
C) Switch from Dataflow to Cloud Functions for lower latency processing
D) Manually increase the number of worker instances before peak hours and decrease afterward
Answer: A
Explanation:
Enabling autoscaling in Dataflow and configuring maximum worker instances based on expected peak load is the optimal solution, making option A the correct answer. Dataflow’s autoscaling feature automatically adjusts the number of worker instances based on the current workload, ensuring that your pipeline has sufficient resources during peak hours while minimizing costs during periods of lower activity. Autoscaling continuously monitors pipeline metrics including backlog size, CPU utilization, and throughput to determine when to scale up or down. During peak hours when data volume increases, Dataflow automatically provisions additional workers to maintain low latency and high throughput. When load decreases, it scales down to reduce costs. By configuring the maximum number of worker instances, you set an upper bound that prevents excessive scaling while ensuring adequate capacity for peak loads. This approach provides the right balance between performance and cost without requiring manual intervention. Dataflow’s autoscaling is specifically designed for streaming pipelines and understands the nuances of distributed stream processing, making scaling decisions based on comprehensive pipeline health metrics rather than simple resource utilization. Option B is incorrect because increasing the number of Pub/Sub subscriptions doesn’t address the processing capacity issue in Dataflow and would create duplicate message delivery, requiring deduplication logic and potentially causing data consistency issues. Option C is incorrect because Cloud Functions is designed for lightweight event processing, not for complex streaming data pipelines that require stateful processing, windowing, and exactly-once processing semantics that Dataflow provides. Option D is incorrect because manual scaling requires predicting peak times accurately, introduces operational overhead, creates potential for human error, may result in over-provisioning or under-provisioning, and doesn’t adapt dynamically to unexpected load variations.
Question 173
Your company stores financial transaction data in BigQuery. You need to implement a solution that tracks all queries executed against sensitive tables and identifies unusual query patterns. What should you do?
A) Enable BigQuery audit logs in Cloud Logging and use Log Analytics to identify unusual patterns
B) Create a scheduled query that runs hourly to check the INFORMATION_SCHEMA.JOBS table for suspicious queries
C) Use Cloud DLP to scan BigQuery tables for sensitive data exposure
D) Implement custom logging code in all applications that query BigQuery
Answer: A
Explanation:
Enabling BigQuery audit logs in Cloud Logging and using Log Analytics to identify unusual patterns is the comprehensive and effective approach, making option A the correct answer. BigQuery automatically generates detailed audit logs that capture all data access and administrative activities when audit logging is enabled. These logs include information about who executed queries, when they were executed, which tables were accessed, the query text, the amount of data processed, and query performance metrics. Cloud Logging centralizes these audit logs, making them available for analysis, retention, and compliance purposes. The audit logs capture three types of activities: admin activity logs for configuration changes, data access logs for queries and table operations, and system event logs for automated BigQuery operations. Log Analytics, a feature within Cloud Logging, provides powerful capabilities for analyzing log data using SQL queries, allowing you to identify unusual patterns such as queries accessing sensitive tables outside normal business hours, users executing queries they haven’t run before, queries accessing unusually large amounts of data, or queries originating from unexpected locations or IP addresses. You can create log-based metrics and alerting policies that automatically notify security teams when suspicious patterns are detected. This approach provides comprehensive visibility into BigQuery usage without requiring code changes or manual monitoring. Option B is incorrect because scheduled queries checking INFORMATION_SCHEMA.JOBS introduce delays in detecting suspicious activity, provide only periodic snapshots rather than continuous monitoring, and require complex custom logic to identify unusual patterns. Option C is incorrect because Cloud DLP is designed to discover and classify sensitive data within tables, not to monitor query patterns or track access to tables. Option D is incorrect because implementing custom logging in applications is complex, error-prone, doesn’t capture queries from all sources, and duplicates functionality already provided by BigQuery’s native audit logging.
Question 174
You are building a data pipeline that ingests data from multiple sources with different schemas. The pipeline must handle schema evolution and support both batch and streaming data. Which Google Cloud service is most appropriate?
A) Cloud Spanner with schema migration tools
B) Dataflow with Schema Registry and Apache Avro format
C) Cloud SQL with JSON columns for flexible schema storage
D) Cloud Bigtable with dynamic column families
Answer: B
Explanation:
Using Dataflow with Schema Registry and Apache Avro format is the most appropriate solution for handling multiple sources with different schemas and supporting schema evolution, making option B the correct answer. Dataflow is a unified stream and batch processing service that can handle both batch and streaming data within the same pipeline framework, meeting the dual processing requirement. Apache Avro is a data serialization format that includes schema information with the data, making it ideal for scenarios where schemas evolve over time. Avro schemas are defined in JSON format and support forward and backward compatibility, allowing producers and consumers to use different versions of schemas without breaking data processing pipelines. When a schema evolves by adding new fields, Avro can handle the changes gracefully by using default values for new fields when reading older data. Schema Registry is a centralized repository for managing schemas and enforcing compatibility rules. It stores schema versions and validates that new schemas are compatible with previous versions according to configured compatibility modes. Dataflow can integrate with Schema Registry to retrieve schemas dynamically at runtime, ensuring that data is correctly deserialized regardless of schema version. This architecture supports multiple data sources with different schemas because each source can register its schema in the registry, and Dataflow can process each source according to its specific schema. Option A is incorrect because Cloud Spanner is a globally distributed relational database designed for transactional workloads with strong consistency, not for data pipeline processing of heterogeneous sources, and schema migrations in Spanner require careful planning and coordination. Option C is incorrect because while Cloud SQL with JSON columns provides schema flexibility, Cloud SQL is a transactional database not optimized for large-scale batch and streaming data processing pipelines. Option D is incorrect because Cloud Bigtable is a NoSQL wide-column database designed for high-throughput, low-latency access to structured data, not for processing pipelines with schema evolution requirements.
Question 175
Your organization runs daily batch jobs that load data from Cloud Storage into BigQuery. The jobs frequently fail due to malformed records in source files. You need to ensure that jobs complete successfully while identifying problematic records. What should you do?
A) Configure the BigQuery load job with maxBadRecords parameter and write rejected records to a separate error table
B) Use Dataflow to validate all records before loading into BigQuery and filter out invalid records
C) Implement custom error handling in the application that generates the source files
D) Use Cloud Functions to validate files before the load job executes and reject invalid files
Answer: A
Explanation:
Configuring the BigQuery load job with maxBadRecords parameter and writing rejected records to a separate error table is the most efficient and practical solution, making option A the correct answer. BigQuery’s load jobs include built-in error handling capabilities specifically designed to handle malformed records gracefully. The maxBadRecords parameter allows you to specify the maximum number of bad records that can be encountered before the entire load job fails. By setting this parameter to an appropriate value, you allow jobs to complete successfully even when encountering some invalid records, as long as the number of errors remains below the threshold. When bad records are encountered, BigQuery automatically logs detailed error information including the record content, the specific parsing error, and the location in the source file. You can configure the load job to write these rejected records to a separate table or export error details to Cloud Logging for further investigation. This approach provides visibility into data quality issues while ensuring that valid records are successfully loaded. The error table can be monitored and analyzed to identify patterns in data quality problems, enabling you to work with data producers to improve source data quality over time. Option B is incorrect because while Dataflow provides more sophisticated validation capabilities, it introduces additional complexity, cost, and processing time for a problem that BigQuery’s native functionality can handle effectively, especially for simple format validation issues. Option C is incorrect because modifying the source application may not be feasible if you don’t control those systems, and even with improvements, some level of error handling in the ingestion pipeline remains necessary for resilience. Option D is incorrect because using Cloud Functions to pre-validate files adds an extra processing step that increases latency and cost while duplicating validation logic that BigQuery already performs during the load operation.
Question 176
You need to join data from BigQuery with data stored in Cloud SQL for analysis. The Cloud SQL database contains 100 million rows, and you need to perform this join operation regularly. What is the most efficient approach?
A) Use federated queries in BigQuery to query Cloud SQL directly without moving data
B) Export Cloud SQL data to Cloud Storage daily and load it into BigQuery
C) Create a Cloud SQL read replica and increase its resources to handle BigQuery queries
D) Use Dataflow to stream changes from Cloud SQL to BigQuery in real-time
Answer: B
Explanation:
Exporting Cloud SQL data to Cloud Storage daily and loading it into BigQuery is the most efficient approach for regular large-scale join operations, making option B the correct answer. This approach moves the data from the transactional Cloud SQL environment into BigQuery’s analytics-optimized architecture, enabling fast and cost-effective joins at scale. Cloud SQL is designed for transactional workloads with support for ACID properties, row-level locking, and fast single-row lookups, but it is not optimized for large-scale analytical queries involving massive joins and aggregations. BigQuery, in contrast, is specifically architected for analytical workloads with columnar storage, distributed query execution, and automatic optimization for large datasets. By exporting Cloud SQL data to Cloud Storage and loading it into BigQuery, you leverage each system for its strengths. The export operation can be scheduled to run daily during off-peak hours to minimize impact on transactional workloads. Cloud Storage acts as an efficient intermediate staging area with high throughput for large data transfers. Loading data from Cloud Storage into BigQuery is highly optimized and can handle large volumes quickly. Once data is in BigQuery, join operations with other BigQuery tables execute efficiently using BigQuery’s distributed processing capabilities, providing superior performance compared to federated queries. Option A is incorrect because while federated queries allow BigQuery to query external data sources including Cloud SQL, they have significant performance limitations for large datasets because query processing depends on Cloud SQL’s query engine and network data transfer, making them unsuitable for joining 100 million rows regularly. Option C is incorrect because read replicas improve Cloud SQL’s read capacity for transactional queries but don’t address the fundamental architectural mismatch between transactional databases and analytical workloads requiring large-scale joins. Option D is incorrect because real-time streaming with Dataflow introduces significant complexity and cost that may be unnecessary if daily updates are sufficient, and would be more appropriate only if near real-time data freshness is a strict requirement.
Question 177
Your data engineering team uses Jupyter notebooks for exploratory data analysis on BigQuery datasets. You need to provide a managed environment that integrates with BigQuery and supports collaboration. What should you use?
A) Vertex AI Workbench with BigQuery integration and shared notebook instances
B) Compute Engine instances with Jupyter installed and BigQuery client libraries
C) Cloud Shell with built-in Jupyter support for quick analysis
D) Dataproc clusters with Jupyter notebooks and BigQuery connectors
Answer: A
Explanation:
Using Vertex AI Workbench with BigQuery integration and shared notebook instances is the optimal solution for managed exploratory data analysis, making option A the correct answer. Vertex AI Workbench is Google Cloud’s managed notebook service specifically designed for data science and machine learning workflows with seamless integration to BigQuery and other Google Cloud services. It provides pre-configured notebook environments that include popular data analysis libraries like pandas, numpy, matplotlib, and the BigQuery Python client library, eliminating the need for manual setup and configuration. Vertex AI Workbench offers native BigQuery integration through magic commands that allow you to query BigQuery directly from notebook cells using SQL syntax, with results automatically loaded into pandas DataFrames for analysis. The service provides two types of managed notebooks: user-managed notebooks that give you more control over the environment, and managed notebooks that are fully managed with automatic scaling and health monitoring. For team collaboration, Vertex AI Workbench supports sharing notebooks with team members, version control integration with Git repositories, and the ability to schedule notebook execution for automated workflows. The managed infrastructure eliminates the operational burden of maintaining servers, patching systems, and configuring environments, allowing your data engineering team to focus on analysis rather than infrastructure management. Security features include integration with Cloud IAM for access control, encryption at rest and in transit, and VPC Service Controls for additional security boundaries. Option B is incorrect because using Compute Engine instances requires manual installation, configuration, and maintenance of Jupyter and dependencies, creating operational overhead and inconsistency across team members’ environments without native collaboration features. Option C is incorrect because Cloud Shell is designed for quick administrative tasks and has limited computational resources, ephemeral storage, and automatic timeout policies that make it unsuitable for sustained exploratory data analysis or collaborative work. Option D is incorrect because Dataproc is optimized for Spark and Hadoop workloads rather than interactive notebook-based analysis, requires cluster management overhead, and is more costly and complex than necessary for BigQuery-focused exploratory data analysis.
Question 178
Your company collects IoT sensor data that arrives in JSON format with nested structures. You need to flatten this data and load it into BigQuery for analysis. What is the most efficient approach?
A) Use BigQuery’s JSON functions to query nested fields directly without flattening
B) Use Dataflow with ParDo transformations to flatten JSON and load into BigQuery
C) Load JSON directly into BigQuery and use UNNEST operations in queries to flatten data
D) Write custom Python scripts on Compute Engine to flatten JSON before loading
Answer: B
Explanation:
Using Dataflow with ParDo transformations to flatten JSON and load into BigQuery is the most efficient approach for processing and transforming streaming IoT data, making option B the correct answer. Dataflow provides a scalable, managed service specifically designed for data transformation pipelines that can handle high-volume streaming data from IoT sensors. The ParDo transformation in Apache Beam (the programming model underlying Dataflow) allows you to write custom logic to parse nested JSON structures, extract relevant fields, flatten hierarchical data into relational format, and perform any necessary data cleansing or enrichment. This transformation happens during the data pipeline execution before data reaches BigQuery, ensuring that data is stored in an optimized format for analytical queries. Flattening data during ingestion provides several advantages: queries against flattened tables execute faster because they don’t require complex JSON parsing or UNNEST operations, storage is more efficient with proper data types rather than storing everything as JSON strings, and query performance is more predictable because the data structure is normalized. Dataflow automatically scales to handle variable IoT data volumes, provides exactly-once processing semantics to ensure data accuracy, and supports windowing operations for time-based aggregations on streaming data. The service integrates seamlessly with Pub/Sub for ingesting IoT data and with BigQuery for loading results, creating an end-to-end managed pipeline. Option A is incorrect because while BigQuery supports JSON functions for querying nested data, repeatedly parsing JSON in queries is computationally expensive, leads to slower query performance, and increases query costs compared to having data already flattened in proper columnar format. Option C is incorrect because while loading JSON directly is simple, using UNNEST operations in every query adds overhead, complicates query logic for users, makes queries harder to optimize, and results in slower performance especially with deeply nested structures. Option D is incorrect because custom scripts on Compute Engine require manual infrastructure management, don’t provide automatic scaling for variable IoT data volumes, lack built-in reliability features like retry logic and checkpointing, and are more complex to maintain compared to managed Dataflow pipelines
Question 179
You are designing a data warehouse in BigQuery that will store sales data from multiple countries. Queries typically filter by country and date. How should you optimize table design for query performance and cost?
A) Partition tables by date and cluster by country
B) Create separate tables for each country without partitioning
C) Use a single table with no partitioning or clustering
D) Partition by country and cluster by date
Answer: A
Explanation:
Partitioning tables by date and clustering by country is the optimal design for this use case, making option A the correct answer. This approach leverages both BigQuery optimization features to minimize data scanning and improve query performance. Partitioning divides a table into segments based on a partitioning column, and for time-series data like sales records, date-based partitioning is the recommended approach. When queries include date filters in WHERE clauses, BigQuery can eliminate entire partitions from consideration, a process called partition pruning. This dramatically reduces the amount of data scanned, improving both query speed and cost efficiency. BigQuery supports ingestion-time partitioning, date/timestamp column partitioning, and integer range partitioning, with date-based partitioning being most appropriate for sales data. Clustering complements partitioning by organizing data within each partition based on specified clustering columns. When you cluster by country, rows with the same country value are stored physically close together within each date partition. This enables BigQuery to skip blocks of data that don’t match the country filter, further reducing data scanning. The combination is particularly powerful for queries that filter on both dimensions, such as analyzing sales for a specific country within a date range. BigQuery automatically maintains clustering as data is inserted, and the system periodically re-clusters data to maintain optimal organization without manual intervention. This design directly aligns with the stated query patterns of filtering by country and date, ensuring that the most common queries benefit from maximum optimization. Option B is incorrect because separate tables per country create management complexity, require UNION queries to analyze data across countries, complicate schema changes, and don’t optimize for date-based filtering which is equally important according to the requirements. Option C is incorrect because without partitioning or clustering, every query must scan the entire table regardless of filters, resulting in poor performance, high costs, and inefficient resource utilization as data volume grows. Option D is incorrect because partitioning by country creates operational challenges with potentially hundreds of partitions, limits flexibility for cross-country analysis, and doesn’t align with BigQuery’s best practices which recommend date/timestamp partitioning for time-series data.
Question 180
Your organization needs to migrate 5 PB of historical data from on-premises Hadoop clusters to Google Cloud. The data must remain accessible during migration, and the migration should minimize impact on ongoing operations. What is the best approach?
A) Use Storage Transfer Service to copy data from on-premises to Cloud Storage, then process with Dataproc
B) Set up Cloud VPN and use gsutil to transfer data incrementally to Cloud Storage
C) Use Transfer Appliance for initial bulk transfer, then set up incremental replication for ongoing changes
D) Deploy Dataproc clusters and use DistCp to copy data directly from on-premises HDFS to Cloud Storage
Answer: C
Explanation:
Using Transfer Appliance for initial bulk transfer followed by incremental replication for ongoing changes is the best approach for large-scale migrations with minimal disruption, making option C the correct answer. The Transfer Appliance is specifically designed for migrating massive datasets (hundreds of terabytes to petabytes) where network-based transfers would take prohibitively long or consume too much bandwidth. With 5 PB of data, transferring over the network would require sustained multi-gigabit bandwidth for weeks or months, which is often impractical and would impact production operations. The Transfer Appliance is a high-capacity storage device that Google ships to your datacenter. You rack the appliance in your data center, connect it to your network, and copy data to the device at local network speeds without consuming internet bandwidth. Once loaded, you ship the appliance back to Google, where the data is uploaded to Cloud Storage at Google’s datacenter speeds. This physical transfer method bypasses network limitations entirely, making it the fastest and most reliable option for initial bulk migration of petabyte-scale data. After the initial bulk transfer completes, you establish incremental replication to sync ongoing changes while the data remains accessible in the on-premises Hadoop cluster. Tools like Apache Sqoop, custom scripts using Hadoop’s change data capture, or third-party replication tools can continuously sync new and modified data to Cloud Storage. This hybrid approach ensures that the on-premises system remains operational during migration, minimizes disruption to business operations, and ensures data consistency. Once incremental replication catches up and the delta between source and destination is minimal, you can perform a final cutover with minimal downtime. Option A is incorrect because Storage Transfer Service is designed for cloud-to-cloud or internet-accessible source transfers, not for direct on-premises Hadoop cluster access, and 5 PB would take extremely long over network connections. Option B is incorrect because while Cloud VPN provides secure connectivity, transferring 5 PB over VPN would require months of continuous transfer at maximum bandwidth, consume all available network capacity, and severely impact ongoing operations. Option D is incorrect because DistCp over WAN connections is inefficient for petabyte-scale initial transfers, would consume enormous bandwidth for extended periods, lacks the reliability features of managed transfer services, and would significantly impact production network performance.
