Visit here for our full Cisco 350-901 exam dumps and practice test questions.
Question 61
A developer is building an application that integrates with multiple Cisco APIs. The application needs to implement a retry mechanism for failed requests. Which strategy should be used to implement retries effectively?
A) Retry immediately upon failure without any delay
B) Implement exponential backoff with jitter to avoid thundering herd problem
C) Retry only once and give up if it fails again
D) Retry indefinitely until the request succeeds
Answer: B
Explanation:
The correct answer is B) Implement exponential backoff with jitter to avoid thundering herd problem. Exponential backoff increases the delay between retry attempts (e.g., 1 second, 2 seconds, 4 seconds, 8 seconds), giving the server time to recover from temporary failures. Jitter adds randomness to delays, preventing multiple clients from retrying simultaneously, which would cause the same congestion that triggered the original failure. This strategy balances resilience with resource efficiency.
Option A) is incorrect because immediate retries intensify server load and worsen failures. Option C) is incorrect because single retries miss legitimate transient failures. Option D) is incorrect because infinite retries consume resources and never resolve permanent failures. Exponential backoff with jitter is the industry standard for implementing reliable retry mechanisms in distributed systems.
Question 62
A developer is working with Cisco DNA Center APIs to retrieve network device information. The API response contains nested JSON objects with deeply structured data. How should the developer access specific values from nested structures?
A) Flatten the entire JSON structure before accessing values
B) Use dot notation or nested dictionary/object access provided by the programming language
C) Convert JSON to string and parse manually
D) Access only top-level keys
Answer: B
Explanation:
The correct answer is B) Use dot notation or nested dictionary/object access provided by the programming language. Most programming languages provide natural ways to access nested structures. Python uses nested dictionaries with bracket notation or dot access through objects. JavaScript uses dot notation or bracket notation. These native approaches are efficient, readable, and maintainable. Some libraries like JSONPath provide query languages for accessing deeply nested values with minimal code, making complex data extraction straightforward.
Option A) is incorrect because flattening adds unnecessary complexity and data loss. Option C) is incorrect because manual string parsing is error-prone and inefficient. Option D) is incorrect because ignoring nested data wastes valuable information. Native language support for nested access is the standard approach for working with complex JSON structures.
Question 63
A developer is implementing authentication for a Cisco platform integration using API keys. Where should API keys be stored securely?
A) In configuration files committed to version control
B) Hardcoded in the source code
C) In environment variables or secure vaults like AWS Secrets Manager or HashiCorp Vault
D) In plain text files on the server
Answer: C
Explanation:
The correct answer is C) In environment variables or secure vaults like AWS Secrets Manager or HashiCorp Vault. Secure storage mechanisms protect API keys from unauthorized access. Environment variables isolate credentials from code, while dedicated vaults provide encryption, access controls, and audit logging. These approaches prevent credentials from appearing in version control history or source code repositories, significantly reducing breach risk. Enterprise applications typically use managed services that handle key rotation and revocation automatically.
Option A) is incorrect because committing credentials to version control creates permanent exposure. Option B) is incorrect because hardcoded credentials are easily discovered and create security vulnerabilities. Option D) is incorrect because plain text files are easily compromised. Secure external storage for credentials is fundamental to security best practices in production applications.
Question 64
A developer is designing an API client library for multiple Cisco services. The library should be reusable across different projects. Which design pattern should be used?
A) Implement unique code for each service without reusability
B) Use abstract base classes or interfaces to define common API client behavior
C) Copy-paste code between projects when needed
D) Avoid using design patterns for simplicity
Answer: B
Explanation:
The correct answer is B) Use abstract base classes or interfaces to define common API client behavior. Abstract base classes or interfaces define contracts that all API clients must follow, ensuring consistent behavior across different Cisco services. Concrete implementations extend these abstractions, handling service-specific details. This approach follows the Template Method pattern, reducing code duplication and enabling developers to swap implementations easily. It also facilitates testing through mock implementations and makes the codebase more maintainable.
Option A) is incorrect because unique per-service code duplicates effort and creates maintenance nightmares. Option C) is incorrect because copy-pasting introduces bugs and makes updates difficult. Option D) is incorrect because appropriate design patterns significantly improve code quality. Design patterns like abstract base classes enable building scalable, maintainable client libraries.
Question 65
A developer needs to handle different response formats from Cisco APIs. Some endpoints return XML while others return JSON. How should format handling be implemented?
A) Assume all responses are JSON and fail on XML
B) Implement format detection and use appropriate parsers based on Content-Type headers
C) Manually parse all responses as strings
D) Convert all formats to CSV
Answer: B
Explanation:
The correct answer is B) Implement format detection and use appropriate parsers based on Content-Type headers. The Content-Type header specifies response format, allowing applications to select appropriate parsers. By checking this header and routing responses to JSON or XML parsers accordingly, applications handle multiple formats transparently. This approach is flexible, maintainable, and follows HTTP standards. Many libraries provide automatic format detection, making implementation straightforward.
Option A) is incorrect because ignoring XML responses causes integration failures. Option C) is incorrect because manual string parsing is unreliable and error-prone. Option D) is incorrect because CSV is inappropriate for structured data from REST APIs. Format detection based on Content-Type headers is the standard approach for handling multiple response formats.
Question 66
A developer is implementing error handling for API calls that may fail temporarily or permanently. How should different error types be handled?
A) Treat all errors identically and always retry
B) Distinguish between client errors (4xx), server errors (5xx), and network errors, handling each appropriately
C) Ignore all errors silently
D) Log errors but take no action
Answer: B
Explanation:
The correct answer is B) Distinguish between client errors (4xx), server errors (5xx), and network errors, handling each appropriately. Different error types require different responses. Client errors (e.g., 400 Bad Request, 401 Unauthorized, 404 Not Found) indicate application bugs or permission issues—retrying won’t help. Server errors (500, 503) are often transient and may benefit from retries. Network errors (connection timeouts, DNS failures) are typically transient and should be retried. This classification enables intelligent error handling strategies.
Option A) is incorrect because retrying client errors wastes resources. Option C) is incorrect because silent failures hide problems and cause data inconsistencies. Option D) is incorrect because logging without action doesn’t resolve failures. Differentiated error handling based on root causes is essential for building robust applications.
Question 67
A developer is building a monitoring dashboard for Cisco Webex API integrations. The dashboard needs to track API performance metrics. Which metrics should be monitored?
A) Only successful request counts
B) Response times, error rates, throughput, and availability metrics
C) No metrics are necessary
D) Only error counts without context
Answer: B
Explanation:
The correct answer is B) Response times, error rates, throughput, and availability metrics. Comprehensive metrics provide visibility into API health and application performance. Response times indicate performance degradation, error rates identify reliability issues, throughput tracks capacity utilization, and availability metrics measure uptime. Together, these metrics enable proactive problem detection and capacity planning. Tools like Prometheus or CloudWatch facilitate metric collection and visualization. Alert thresholds trigger notifications when metrics exceed acceptable ranges.
Option A) is incorrect because ignoring errors masks problems until users report issues. Option C) is incorrect because metrics are essential for operations visibility. Option D) is incorrect because error counts without context don’t indicate severity or patterns. Comprehensive metrics monitoring is fundamental to operating reliable production systems.
Question 68
A developer is implementing request tracing for distributed Cisco platform API calls. How should end-to-end request flows be tracked across services?
A) Don’t track requests; rely on individual service logs
B) Implement distributed tracing using correlation IDs or trace IDs propagated across service boundaries
C) Manually combine logs from different services after the fact
D) Trace only requests that fail
Answer: B
Explanation:
The correct answer is B) Implement distributed tracing using correlation IDs or trace IDs propagated across service boundaries. Distributed tracing tracks requests across multiple services by assigning unique trace IDs. Each service includes this ID in log entries and passes it to downstream services. Correlating logs by trace ID reveals complete request flows, enabling root cause analysis for failures. Tools like Jaeger or Zipkin provide distributed tracing infrastructure. This capability is essential for debugging complex interactions across multiple APIs.
Option A) is incorrect because individual service logs don’t show interactions between services. Option C) is incorrect because manual log correlation is tedious and error-prone. Option D) is incorrect because tracing only failures misses performance issues and complex behavioral patterns. Distributed tracing with correlation IDs is the standard approach for observing interactions in microservice architectures.
Question 69
A developer is designing API versioning strategy for a Cisco platform integration. The API provider is releasing version 2.0. How should versioning be managed?
A) Immediately force all clients to version 2.0
B) Support multiple API versions simultaneously during a transition period
C) Ignore the new version and continue using the old one
D) Alternate between versions randomly
Answer: B
Explanation:
The correct answer is B) Support multiple API versions simultaneously during a transition period. Supporting multiple versions allows clients to migrate at their own pace, preventing disruption. Providers should deprecate old versions gradually, notifying clients of upcoming deadlines. Clients can test integration with new versions before full migration. This approach balances stability with progress, enabling smooth transitions. Documentation should clearly mark deprecated versions and guide migration steps.
Option A) is incorrect because forcing immediate upgrades breaks existing integrations. Option C) is incorrect because indefinitely using deprecated versions eventually becomes impossible. Option D) is incorrect because random version selection creates unpredictable behavior. Gradual version transitions with overlapping support periods are the standard approach for managing API evolution.
Question 70
A developer is implementing connection pooling for a Cisco platform integration that makes many API requests. How does connection pooling improve performance?
A) Connection pooling doesn’t affect performance
B) Pooling reuses existing connections, reducing TCP handshake overhead and improving throughput
C) Pooling creates a new connection for every request
D) Pooling is only useful for database connections
Answer: B
Explanation:
The correct answer is B) Pooling reuses existing connections, reducing TCP handshake overhead and improving throughput. Connection pooling maintains a set of pre-established connections. When a request is needed, the client reuses an available connection instead of creating a new one. This eliminates expensive TCP handshakes, SSL/TLS negotiations, and connection establishment delays. For applications making many requests, connection pooling provides significant performance improvements. Most HTTP client libraries provide built-in connection pooling configuration.
Option A) is incorrect because connection pooling substantially improves performance. Option C) is incorrect because pooling specifically avoids creating new connections. Option D) is incorrect because connection pooling benefits any protocol, including HTTP. Connection pooling is a fundamental optimization for applications making frequent network requests.
Question 71
A developer is working with Cisco Meraki APIs to configure network policies. The API requires sending complex nested JSON payloads. How should the payload be constructed?
A) Build JSON strings manually using string concatenation
B) Use language-native data structures and serialize them to JSON
C) Use raw JSON without structure
D) Convert Python objects to strings
Answer: B
Explanation:
The correct answer is B) Use language-native data structures and serialize them to JSON. Building payloads using native dictionaries or objects and serializing them to JSON is cleaner, safer, and less error-prone than manual string construction. The JSON library automatically handles escaping, proper formatting, and type conversion. This approach reduces bugs from malformed JSON and makes code more maintainable. Developers can easily construct complex nested structures using intuitive data structures.
Option A) is incorrect because string concatenation easily produces malformed JSON and is error-prone. Option C) is incorrect because unstructured raw JSON is difficult to construct correctly. Option D) is incorrect because converting objects to strings doesn’t properly format JSON. Using language-native serialization is the standard approach for generating correct, maintainable JSON payloads.
Question 72
A developer is implementing API client library documentation. Which elements are most important for developers using the library?
A) Only list function names without descriptions
B) Include usage examples, method signatures, parameter descriptions, return types, and error conditions
C) Provide no documentation
D) Include only internal implementation details
Answer: B
Explanation:
The correct answer is B) Include usage examples, method signatures, parameter descriptions, return types, and error conditions. Complete documentation enables developers to use the library effectively. Usage examples show common patterns, method signatures specify available functions, parameter descriptions clarify arguments, return types indicate expected results, and error conditions explain failure scenarios. Well-documented libraries reduce integration time and support burden. Tools like Sphinx for Python or JSDoc for JavaScript automate documentation generation from code comments.
Option A) is incorrect because minimal documentation forces developers to read source code. Option C) is incorrect because undocumented libraries are difficult to use. Option D) is incorrect because implementation details are less important than usage guidance. Comprehensive external documentation is essential for usable, maintainable libraries.
Question 73
A developer is implementing request validation before sending to Cisco platform APIs. What should be validated?
A) No validation is necessary
B) Validate data types, required fields, value ranges, and format compliance with API specifications
C) Validate only after receiving responses
D) Validate randomly
Answer: B
Explanation:
The correct answer is B) Validate data types, required fields, value ranges, and format compliance with API specifications. Pre-request validation catches errors early, preventing invalid API calls that waste quota and generate errors. Validating data types ensures compatibility, checking required fields prevents incomplete requests, verifying value ranges ensures business logic compliance, and format compliance checks prevent malformed data. Comprehensive validation improves reliability and reduces debugging time. Many libraries provide declarative validation schemas that work with Python, JavaScript, and other languages.
Option A) is incorrect because invalid requests fail unnecessarily. Option C) is incorrect because validating responses doesn’t prevent sending bad requests. Option D) is incorrect because random validation misses problems inconsistently. Comprehensive pre-request validation is essential for robust API integrations.
Question 74
A developer is implementing a circuit breaker pattern for Cisco API calls. When should a circuit breaker trip to open state?
A) Never trip; always send requests
B) Trip after a threshold of consecutive failures to prevent cascading failures
C) Trip randomly
D) Trip on every request
Answer: B
Explanation:
The correct answer is B) Trip after a threshold of consecutive failures to prevent cascading failures. A circuit breaker acts like an electrical circuit breaker, cutting off requests when a service is unhealthy. After a configurable failure threshold (e.g., 5 failures in 10 seconds), the circuit breaker opens, immediately rejecting new requests without attempting API calls. This prevents wasting resources on failing services and allows them time to recover. After a timeout period, the circuit breaker enters half-open state, testing if the service recovered before resuming normal operation.
Option A) is incorrect because sending requests to failed services wastes resources. Option C) is incorrect because random tripping creates unpredictable behavior. Option D) is incorrect because permanently open circuits break functionality. Circuit breakers with intelligent threshold-based logic improve resilience and recovery in distributed systems.
Question 75
A developer is implementing a feature flag system for gradually rolling out changes to Cisco API integrations. How should feature flags be managed?
A) Hardcode feature flags in the application
B) Use external configuration services allowing runtime toggling without redeployment
C) Flip feature flags randomly
D) Never use feature flags
Answer: B
Explanation:
The correct answer is B) Use external configuration services allowing runtime toggling without redeployment. External feature flag services (like LaunchDarkly or AWS AppConfig) enable runtime toggling without code redeployment. Developers can gradually roll out changes to percentages of users, enable features for specific regions or user segments, and quickly disable problematic features. This approach enables safe, gradual deployments and reduces rollout risk. Integration with application code requires minimal changes—usually simple conditional checks reading flag state.
Option A) is incorrect because hardcoded flags require redeployment to change. Option C) is incorrect because random flags create unpredictable behavior. Option D) is incorrect because feature flags are essential for safe deployments. External feature flag services enable sophisticated deployment strategies in production environments.
Question 76
A developer is building a health check endpoint for an application using Cisco APIs. What should the health check verify?
A) No checks are needed
B) Verify database connectivity, external API availability, and critical dependencies
C) Check only disk space
D) Return fixed success responses
Answer: B
Explanation:
The correct answer is B) Verify database connectivity, external API availability, and critical dependencies. Comprehensive health checks provide real-time status of application dependencies. Checking database connectivity verifies data layer availability, testing external APIs confirms upstream service health, and checking critical dependencies ensures the application can function. Load balancers and orchestration systems use health checks to route traffic away from unhealthy instances, enabling automatic failover. Health checks typically implement a lightweight endpoint (e.g., /health) that quickly verifies critical systems.
Option A) is incorrect because health checks are essential for operations visibility. Option C) is incorrect because disk space alone doesn’t indicate application health. Option D) is incorrect because fixed responses mask actual failures. Comprehensive health checks checking actual dependencies are essential for production reliability.
Question 77
A developer is implementing input sanitization for a web application that calls Cisco APIs. Why is sanitization important?
A) Sanitization has no security benefit
B) Sanitization prevents injection attacks and malformed data from reaching APIs
C) Sanitization is only necessary for passwords
D) Sanitization should not be performed
Answer: B
Explanation:
The correct answer is B) Sanitization prevents injection attacks and malformed data from reaching APIs. Input sanitization removes or escapes potentially dangerous characters before using data in API calls or queries. This prevents injection attacks where attackers embed malicious code in input. For API calls, sanitization ensures special characters are properly escaped, preventing malformed requests. Sanitization is a crucial defense layer that works alongside input validation. Different contexts require different sanitization approaches—URL encoding for URLs, JSON escaping for JSON, SQL escaping for databases.
Option A) is incorrect because sanitization is fundamental security practice. Option C) is incorrect because sanitization is necessary for all inputs. Option D) is incorrect because sanitization is essential. Input sanitization is a core security requirement for applications accepting user input.
Question 78
A developer is implementing caching headers for a Cisco API response. Which HTTP headers should be used to control caching behavior?
A) No caching headers are available
B) Use Cache-Control and ETag headers to manage caching behavior
C) Never cache any responses
D) Use only custom headers
Answer: B
Explanation:
The correct answer is B) Use Cache-Control and ETag headers to manage caching behavior. Cache-Control specifies caching directives like max-age (duration), public/private scope, and no-cache/no-store restrictions. ETags provide unique identifiers for resource versions; clients include ETags in subsequent requests, allowing servers to return 304 Not Modified if unchanged. These standard HTTP headers enable efficient caching at multiple levels—browser cache, proxy cache, and CDN—reducing bandwidth and improving latency. API providers set these headers; applications should respect them.
Option A) is incorrect because standard HTTP caching mechanisms exist. Option C) is incorrect because appropriate caching significantly improves performance. Option D) is incorrect because standard headers work better than custom ones. HTTP Cache-Control and ETag headers are industry standards for cache management.
Question 79
A developer is implementing a fallback mechanism for a Cisco API integration. If the primary API fails, requests should use an alternative endpoint. How should this be implemented?
A) Only use the primary endpoint always
B) Implement a fallback chain with health checks and automatic routing to alternate endpoints on failure
C) Manually switch endpoints when one fails
D) Use random endpoint selection
Answer: B
Explanation:
The correct answer is B) Implement a fallback chain with health checks and automatic routing to alternate endpoints on failure. Fallback mechanisms automatically route requests to alternate endpoints when primary endpoints fail. Health checks detect failures, triggering automatic failover without manual intervention. Fallback chains can include multiple alternates, and some implementations prefer endpoints closest in latency or geography. This approach improves resilience and minimizes user impact during outages. Service discovery systems like Consul or DNS with health checks facilitate automatic failover.
Option A) is incorrect because relying only on primary endpoints doesn’t handle failures. Option C) is incorrect because manual switching is slow and error-prone. Option D) is incorrect because random selection doesn’t prioritize healthy endpoints. Automatic failover with health checks is the standard approach for building highly available systems.
Question 80
A developer is implementing API rate limiting on the client side to respect server limits. What is the best approach?
A) Ignore server rate limits and send as many requests as possible
B) Implement request queuing and rate limiting based on documented API limits
C) Send requests randomly without any timing control
D) Send all requests simultaneously
Answer: B
Explanation:
The correct answer is B) Implement request queuing and rate limiting based on documented API limits. Respecting documented rate limits prevents throttling and account suspension. Request queuing buffers requests and releases them at controlled rates, ensuring compliance with limits. Tracking rate limit headers from responses allows adaptive rate limiting that adjusts to actual server capacity. Token bucket algorithms or sliding window approaches implement rate limiting elegantly. Respecting limits demonstrates responsible API citizenship and prevents service disruption.
Option A) is incorrect because excessive requests trigger throttling and IP blocking. Option C) is incorrect because random request rates don’t respect limits. Option D) is incorrect because simultaneous requests exceed limits immediately. Client-side rate limiting is essential for responsible, reliable API integration.
