Visit here for our full Cisco 200-201 exam dumps and practice test questions.
Question 161:
A security analyst needs to investigate a potential malware infection. What is the primary purpose of conducting static malware analysis?
A) Execute malware in production environment
B) Examine malware without executing it by analyzing file properties, strings, hashes, and code structure to understand capabilities and identify indicators of compromise
C) Delete all suspicious files immediately
D) Install malware on all systems for testing
Answer: B
Explanation:
Static malware analysis examining files without execution by analyzing properties, strings, hashes, and code structure reveals malware capabilities and IOCs, making option B the correct answer. Static analysis provides safe initial assessment understanding threats without risking system compromise. File property analysis examines metadata including file size, creation timestamps, file type, and embedded resources. Properties reveal suspicious characteristics like mismatched extensions or unusual compilation dates. Hash calculation generates cryptographic fingerprints using MD5, SHA-1, or SHA-256 algorithms. Hash comparison against threat intelligence databases identifies known malware families. String extraction reveals embedded text including IP addresses, domain names, file paths, and function names. Strings provide clues about malware functionality and infrastructure. Portable executable (PE) analysis examines Windows executable structure including header information, import/export tables showing required libraries, section analysis revealing code and data segments, and packer detection identifying obfuscation. PE analysis reveals technical characteristics. Disassembly converts machine code to assembly language enabling code review without execution. Disassembly reveals program logic, function calls, and suspicious behaviors. Tools like IDA Pro or Ghidra perform advanced disassembly. Signature-based detection compares file against antivirus signatures. While easily evaded, signature matching quickly identifies known threats. YARA rules provide custom signature creation for threat hunting. Static analysis advantages include safety since malware doesn’t execute, speed allowing rapid initial assessment, and scalability enabling automated processing of large sample sets. Static analysis limitations include obfuscation hiding true functionality, packed malware requiring unpacking before analysis, and inability to observe runtime behavior. Despite limitations, static analysis provides crucial first step in malware investigation establishing baseline understanding before dynamic analysis. Option A is incorrect because executing malware in production risks actual compromise; controlled sandbox environments are used for dynamic analysis. Option C is incorrect because immediate deletion prevents investigation and learning about attack methods. Option D is incorrect because intentional widespread installation would cause catastrophic compromise rather than controlled analysis.
Question 162:
An organization needs to implement network segmentation for security. What is the primary benefit of network segmentation?
A) Increase network complexity without security benefits
B) Limit lateral movement by isolating network segments, containing breaches, protecting critical assets, and enforcing security policies at segment boundaries
C) Remove all firewalls from the network
D) Connect all devices to single flat network
Answer: B
Explanation:
Network segmentation limiting lateral movement, containing breaches, protecting critical assets, and enforcing boundary policies provides defense-in-depth security, making option B the correct answer. Segmentation creates security zones preventing attackers from freely traversing networks after initial compromise. Lateral movement restriction prevents attackers from pivoting between systems after gaining foothold. Segmentation creates barriers requiring additional authentication or exploit steps. Restricted movement contains attacks limiting damage scope. Breach containment isolates compromised segments preventing spread to entire network. Contained breaches affect smaller asset subsets reducing overall impact. Containment provides time for detection and response before widespread compromise. Critical asset protection places high-value systems in secure segments with enhanced controls. Separation protects crown jewel data, systems, and intellectual property from compromise of less critical segments. Layered protection defends critical assets. Microsegmentation creates fine-grained security zones at workload or application level rather than broad network segments. Software-defined microsegmentation provides dynamic policy enforcement adapting to changing environments. Zero trust architecture leverages segmentation enforcing verify-never-trust approach where every connection requires authentication regardless of network location. Zero trust assumes breach treating all networks as untrusted. VLAN segmentation uses virtual LANs creating logical network divisions on shared physical infrastructure. VLANs provide efficient segmentation without additional hardware while maintaining traffic isolation. Firewall-based segmentation places firewalls between segments enforcing access control policies. Next-generation firewalls provide application awareness and threat prevention at segment boundaries. DMZ implementation creates demilitarized zones separating external-facing services from internal networks. DMZ segmentation protects internal resources if public services are compromised. Compliance requirements often mandate segmentation separating systems handling sensitive data like payment cards or health records. Segmentation satisfies regulatory requirements for data isolation and access control. Option A is incorrect because while segmentation adds structure, properly designed segmentation simplifies security management rather than creating counterproductive complexity. Option C is incorrect because removing firewalls eliminates critical enforcement points; segmentation requires boundary controls like firewalls. Option D is incorrect because flat networks enable unlimited lateral movement allowing single compromise to potentially access all resources without barriers.
Question 163:
A security analyst is investigating a phishing attack. What indicators should be examined to identify phishing emails?
A) Accept all emails without scrutiny
B) Analyze sender address authenticity, suspicious links and attachments, urgent language, grammatical errors, and spoofed branding to identify phishing characteristics
C) Click all links to test legitimacy
D) Forward suspicious emails to entire organization
Answer: B
Explanation:
Analyzing sender authenticity, suspicious links/attachments, urgency, grammar errors, and spoofed branding identifies phishing characteristics enabling detection, making option B the correct answer. Multiple indicators combine revealing phishing attempts that individual signs might miss. Sender address analysis examines email origin including display name versus actual address mismatches, domain name typosquatting with slight spelling variations, free email services used for business communications, and domain age indicating newly registered malicious domains. Sender verification reveals impersonation attempts. Link inspection without clicking uses hover preview showing actual destination URLs, shortened URL expansion revealing hidden destinations, domain reputation checking against threat intelligence, and homograph attacks using similar-looking characters to mimic legitimate domains. Safe link analysis prevents compromise. Attachment analysis examines files including suspicious file extensions like .exe or .scr, macro-enabled documents potentially containing malicious code, unexpected file types for alleged content, and password-protected archives hiding malicious payloads from scanning. Attachment review identifies delivery mechanisms. Urgency and pressure tactics create time pressure claiming account suspension, payment problems, or limited-time offers. Pressure prevents careful evaluation leading to hasty action without verification. Grammatical errors and poor formatting indicate unprofessional communication including spelling mistakes, awkward phrasing, inconsistent formatting, and poor image quality. While sophisticated phishing improves, errors remain common indicators. Branding inconsistencies reveal spoofing attempts through incorrect logos or colors, missing security indicators legitimate companies include, suspicious sender signatures, and unusual communication channels. Brand analysis detects impersonation. Request for sensitive information including passwords, financial data, personal details, or credentials represents major red flag. Legitimate organizations don’t request sensitive data via email. Email header analysis examines technical details including SPF/DKIM/DMARC authentication results, received headers tracing email path, reply-to address differing from sender, and unusual mail servers. Header inspection reveals email origin and authenticity. Suspicious timing notes emails arriving outside business hours, during holidays, or following publicized events suggesting opportunistic phishing campaigns. Temporal analysis provides context. Verification procedures confirm legitimacy through independent communication using known contact information, checking with IT security before acting, and reporting suspicious emails to security team. Verification prevents successful phishing. Option A is incorrect because accepting all emails without scrutiny guarantees successful phishing attacks will compromise credentials and systems. Option C is incorrect because clicking links tests by actually triggering potential compromise; safe analysis methods exist for link examination. Option D is incorrect because mass forwarding spreads potential threats increasing exposure; suspicious emails should be reported to security team only.
Question 164:
An analyst needs to interpret Snort IDS alerts. What components of a Snort alert should be analyzed to understand the detected threat?
A) Ignore all alerts as false positives
B) Review alert classification, priority, source/destination information, payload data, and signature details to understand threat nature and context
C) Disable IDS to eliminate alerts
D) Respond to alerts without investigation
Answer: B
Explanation:
Reviewing alert classification, priority, source/destination data, payload, and signature details provides comprehensive threat understanding enabling appropriate response, making option B the correct answer. Alert interpretation separates actionable threats from noise guiding investigation and response. Alert classification categorizes threat type including attempted-admin for administrative access attempts, trojan-activity indicating backdoor communication, web-application-attack for web exploits, or policy-violation for rule breaches. Classification indicates attack category. Priority level indicates severity with higher priority suggesting greater threat or successful attack versus reconnaissance or failed attempts. Priority guides response urgency and resource allocation. Source and destination analysis examines traffic participants including source IP showing attack origin, destination IP identifying targeted asset, port numbers revealing targeted services, and protocols indicating communication methods. Participant analysis establishes attack context. Signature information describes detection rule including signature ID referencing specific signature, rule message explaining what was detected, CVE references linking to vulnerabilities, and reference URLs providing additional information. Signature details explain detection basis. Payload data shows actual network traffic triggering alert including packet contents, protocol-specific details, and suspicious patterns matching signature. Payload examination confirms true positive versus false positive. Timestamp indicates when activity occurred enabling timeline construction and correlation with other events. Temporal context aids investigation understanding attack progression. Alert frequency shows how often signature triggered indicating scanning activity, persistent attack attempts, or widespread campaign. Volume analysis reveals attack scale. Direction information shows whether traffic was inbound external attacks or outbound data exfiltration or botnet communication. Direction determines response focus and impacted assets. Context correlation matches alerts with related events from other sources including firewall logs, endpoint detection, or authentication logs. Correlation provides complete attack picture. False positive assessment evaluates alert validity determining if activity is legitimate business traffic miscategorized as threat, authorized security testing, or actual malicious activity requiring response. Validation prevents wasted effort. Tuning decisions determine whether to modify signature to reduce false positives, adjust thresholds, whitelist legitimate traffic, or escalate for response. Proper tuning maintains detection effectiveness while managing alert volume. Response determination based on analysis decides whether to block traffic, isolate affected systems, conduct deeper investigation, or dismiss as false positive. Informed response leverages interpretation insights. Option A is incorrect because blanket dismissal misses real threats and defeats IDS purpose; systematic analysis separates true threats from false positives. Option C is incorrect because disabling IDS eliminates detection capability leaving organization blind to attacks. Option D is incorrect because responding without investigation risks overreaction to false positives or inappropriate response to actual threats misunderstanding their nature.
Question 165:
A security team needs to implement endpoint detection and response (EDR). What capabilities should EDR solutions provide?
A) Provide only antivirus signature scanning
B) Offer continuous monitoring, threat detection, investigation tools, automated response, and forensic capabilities for comprehensive endpoint security
C) Monitor only file downloads without process activity
D) Require manual log review for all events
Answer: B
Explanation:
EDR providing continuous monitoring, detection, investigation, automated response, and forensics delivers comprehensive endpoint security beyond traditional antivirus, making option B the correct answer. EDR represents modern endpoint protection addressing sophisticated threats traditional antivirus misses. Continuous monitoring collects endpoint telemetry including process creation and execution, file system modifications, registry changes, network connections, user activities, and driver loads. Comprehensive visibility captures attack indicators across endpoint activity. Behavioral analysis detects threats through anomaly identification spotting unusual patterns, machine learning models recognizing attack behaviors, and heuristic analysis flagging suspicious combinations of activities. Behavioral detection catches unknown threats signature-based tools miss. Threat intelligence integration enriches detection using IOC feeds comparing observed activity against known threats, reputation services evaluating file and domain trustworthiness, and MITRE ATT&CK mapping identifying attack techniques. Intelligence context improves detection accuracy. Investigation tools support incident response providing timeline reconstruction showing attack progression, root cause analysis identifying initial compromise, scope assessment determining affected systems, and threat hunting capabilities for proactive searches. Investigation features accelerate response. Automated response capabilities contain threats through process termination killing malicious processes, network isolation quarantining infected systems, file quarantine preventing malware execution, and remediation actions removing threats. Automation limits damage during detection-to-response gap. Forensic capabilities preserve evidence including memory capture for analysis, disk imaging for investigation, log retention for historical analysis, and chain of custody documentation for legal proceedings. Forensics support post-incident investigation and legal action. Rollback and recovery features restore affected systems through system state restoration to pre-infection state, file recovery from backups, and configuration remediation. Recovery capabilities minimize downtime and data loss. Centralized management provides visibility across enterprise endpoints, policy enforcement ensuring consistent security, and reporting for compliance and metrics. Centralization enables enterprise-scale protection. Integration with SIEM and SOAR creates comprehensive security platform sharing threat intelligence, correlating endpoint events with network and application activity, and enabling orchestrated response. Integration amplifies effectiveness. Cloud-delivered updates ensure real-time protection through continuous threat intelligence updates, instant signature delivery, and behavioral model improvements. Cloud delivery maintains current protection. Option A is incorrect because signature-only antivirus provides limited protection missing behavioral threats and lacking investigation or response capabilities EDR provides. Option C is incorrect because file downloads alone miss process behavior, network activity, and other attack vectors comprehensive EDR monitoring captures. Option D is incorrect because manual review of all events is impractical at scale and delays detection; automation is essential for timely threat identification.
Question 166:
An analyst is investigating suspicious PowerShell activity. What characteristics indicate potentially malicious PowerShell usage?
A) All PowerShell usage is inherently malicious
B) Identify obfuscated commands, encoded scripts, unusual execution policies, suspicious parameters, and download cradles indicating potential abuse for malicious purposes
C) PowerShell is never used maliciously
D) Block all PowerShell usage across organization
Answer: B
Explanation:
Identifying obfuscation, encoding, policy bypasses, suspicious parameters, and download cradles indicates malicious PowerShell abuse distinguishing attacks from legitimate use, making option B the correct answer. PowerShell’s power makes it attractive to attackers requiring behavioral analysis to detect abuse. Obfuscation techniques hide malicious intent including character substitution replacing letters, string concatenation building commands from fragments, backtick insertion adding escape characters, and variable manipulation using indirect references. Obfuscation impedes analysis signaling malicious intent. Encoded commands use Base64 or other encoding hiding payloads from casual inspection. EncodedCommand parameter passes encoded strings executed after decoding. Encoding conceals malicious content from detection. Execution policy bypasses circumvent restrictions including bypass parameter ignoring policy, unrestricted settings allowing all scripts, or remote signed modifications allowing unsigned local scripts. Policy circumvention enables unauthorized script execution. Download cradles fetch malicious payloads from remote sources using WebClient downloading files, Invoke-WebRequest retrieving content, or Net.WebClient alternative methods. Download patterns indicate stage-one activity retrieving malware. Suspicious parameters and flags include NoProfile preventing profile loading, NonInteractive running without user interface, WindowStyle Hidden concealing execution window, and ExecutionPolicy Bypass overriding restrictions. Parameter combinations suggest evasion attempts. Fileless execution runs entirely in memory without writing files including Invoke-Expression executing strings as commands, ScriptBlock invocation running code blocks, and reflection-based loading injecting assemblies. Fileless techniques evade file-based detection. Privilege escalation attempts seek elevated rights through UAC bypass techniques, credential dumping extracting passwords, or token manipulation. Escalation behaviors indicate attack progression beyond initial access. Persistence mechanisms establish long-term access through registry modifications adding startup entries, scheduled task creation ensuring recurring execution, or WMI event subscriptions triggering on system events. Persistence activities show intent to maintain access. Lateral movement uses PowerShell Remoting enabling remote command execution, credential harvesting preparing for additional compromises, or network enumeration discovering targets. Lateral movement expands attack scope. Context analysis evaluates legitimacy considering parent process determining what launched PowerShell, user context checking if administrator privileges are appropriate, timing noting unusual hours suggesting compromise, and command-line length as exceptionally long commands often indicate obfuscation. Legitimate PowerShell usage includes system administration, automation scripts, and management tasks. Baseline understanding separates normal administrative activity from malicious abuse. Logging configuration captures PowerShell activity through script block logging recording executed code, module logging tracking loaded modules, transcription logging capturing session output, and command-line auditing recording invocations. Comprehensive logging enables detection. Detection strategies identify abuse through command-line analysis, entropy calculation detecting obfuscation, behavioral patterns recognizing attack chains, and correlation with other suspicious activities. Multi-faceted detection improves accuracy. Option A is incorrect because PowerShell is legitimate administrative tool widely used for legitimate purposes; blanket malicious classification creates false positives. Option C is incorrect because PowerShell is frequently abused by attackers for post-exploitation, lateral movement, and persistence due to its power and ubiquity. Option D is incorrect because blocking PowerShell entirely prevents legitimate administrative tasks; detection and response to abuse is more appropriate than complete blocking.
Question 167:
A security analyst needs to analyze SSL/TLS encrypted traffic. What methods enable inspection of encrypted communications?
A) Encrypted traffic cannot be inspected under any circumstances
B) Implement SSL/TLS decryption using proxy certificates, forward proxy interception, or endpoint agents to inspect encrypted content while maintaining security
C) Disable all encryption to enable monitoring
D) Ignore encrypted traffic entirely
Answer: B
Explanation:
Implementing SSL/TLS decryption via proxy certificates, forward proxy interception, or endpoint agents enables encrypted content inspection maintaining security, making option B the correct answer. Encryption protects privacy but also conceals threats requiring decryption capabilities balancing security monitoring with privacy. SSL/TLS proxy interception positions proxy between clients and servers acting as man-in-the-middle establishing separate encrypted sessions with client using proxy’s certificate and with server using server’s certificate. Proxy decrypts, inspects, and re-encrypts traffic passing through. Certificate trust requires deploying proxy’s root certificate to client systems enabling trust of proxy-issued certificates. Certificate deployment establishes trust chain allowing transparent interception without certificate warnings. Inspection capabilities examine decrypted content including malware scanning detecting malicious payloads, data loss prevention checking for sensitive information, policy enforcement ensuring acceptable use, and threat detection identifying command-and-control communications. Inspection reveals threats encrypted channels would hide. Forward proxy deployment places proxy at network perimeter handling outbound traffic from internal clients to external servers. Forward proxy intercepts HTTPS sessions initiated by internal users enabling inspection of outbound communications. Reverse proxy deployment handles inbound traffic to internal servers from external clients providing SSL offloading and inspection for server-bound communications. Reverse proxy protects published services. Endpoint-based decryption deploys agents on client systems enabling inspection at endpoint before encryption or after decryption. Endpoint approach avoids network-level interception while providing visibility. Certificate pinning challenges arise when applications verify specific server certificates rejecting proxy certificates. Pinning bypass requires whitelisting pinned applications from inspection or using application-specific solutions. Privacy considerations balance security monitoring with user privacy implementing policy excluding sensitive sites like healthcare or banking, user notification about monitoring practices, and compliance with regulations governing monitoring. Privacy protection maintains trust while enabling security. Performance impact includes latency from additional processing, computational overhead for encryption/decryption operations, and throughput limitations from inspection processing. Capacity planning ensures adequate performance. Encrypted traffic analytics infers information without decryption through traffic flow analysis examining connection patterns, certificate analysis extracting server identity from certificates, and SNI (Server Name Indication) inspection viewing requested domain names. Indirect analysis provides partial visibility without full decryption. TLS 1.3 considerations note enhanced privacy features complicate interception including encrypted server certificates hiding server identity and earlier key exchange preventing passive decryption. TLS 1.3 requires active interception. Option A is incorrect because multiple methods enable encrypted traffic inspection for security purposes; while challenging, inspection is technically feasible and necessary. Option C is incorrect because disabling encryption eliminates privacy and data protection exposing all communications to eavesdropping; proper inspection maintains encryption. Option D is incorrect because ignoring encrypted traffic creates blind spots attackers exploit hiding command-and-control, data exfiltration, and malware delivery in encrypted channels.
Question 168:
An analyst is investigating a potential data exfiltration incident. What indicators suggest data is being stolen from the network?
A) Assume all outbound traffic is legitimate
B) Monitor unusual outbound traffic volumes, connections to suspicious destinations, large file transfers, unauthorized cloud usage, and abnormal access patterns indicating potential exfiltration
C) Focus only on inbound traffic ignoring outbound
D) Allow all data transfers without monitoring
Answer: B
Explanation:
Monitoring unusual outbound volumes, suspicious destinations, large transfers, unauthorized cloud use, and abnormal access indicates exfiltration attempts, making option B the correct answer. Data theft leaves traces across multiple indicators requiring comprehensive analysis to detect. Traffic volume anomalies identify unusual data movement including significant increases in outbound bandwidth, large sustained transfers outside normal patterns, or spike in traffic during off-hours. Volume changes suggest bulk data extraction. Suspicious destination analysis examines where data is sent including connections to uncommon countries, cloud storage services not used by business, file sharing sites, or IP addresses with poor reputation. Unusual destinations indicate unauthorized data transfer. Large file transfer detection identifies substantial data movement through monitoring upload size thresholds, compressed archives potentially containing sensitive data, or encrypted containers hiding contents. Large transfers warrant investigation. Unauthorized cloud service usage spots shadow IT including access to personal cloud storage, file sharing services violating policy, or external collaboration platforms outside approved tools. Unauthorized services bypass security controls. Protocol analysis identifies covert channels through DNS tunneling encoding data in DNS queries, ICMP tunneling hiding data in ping packets, or steganography concealing data in images. Unconventional protocols evade detection. Abnormal user behavior indicates compromise including access to unusual data outside normal responsibilities, bulk copying of files from file shares or databases, access from unusual locations, or activity during typical off-hours. Behavioral changes suggest insider threat or compromised accounts. Database activity monitoring tracks data extraction from databases including large query results, exported datasets, or bulk downloads. Database-focused monitoring catches structured data theft. Email monitoring detects data leakage through large attachments, external recipients receiving sensitive data, or mass forwarding to personal accounts. Email represents common exfiltration channel. Endpoint monitoring reveals local data preparation including files copied to removable media, documents consolidated in unusual locations, or compression and encryption activities. Endpoint visibility shows attack staging. Data classification tracking monitors sensitive data through DLP solutions identifying confidential files in transit, detecting policy violations, and blocking unauthorized transfers. Classification-aware monitoring protects critical assets. Timeline analysis reconstructs exfiltration sequence from initial access establishing attack entry point, privilege escalation enabling broader access, discovery and staging preparing data for theft, to actual exfiltration transferring data externally. Timeline reveals attack progression. Investigation procedures include identifying data sources determining what was accessed, assessing scope quantifying stolen data, analyzing attacker tools and techniques, and preserving evidence for potential legal action. Systematic investigation characterizes incident. Response actions contain exfiltration through blocking suspicious destinations, revoking compromised credentials, isolating affected systems, and patching vulnerabilities exploited. Rapid response limits data loss. Option A is incorrect because assuming legitimate outbound traffic misses actual exfiltration; investigation requires scrutiny of unusual patterns. Option C is incorrect because focusing only on inbound traffic misses exfiltration which is outbound activity; both directions need monitoring. Option D is incorrect because unmonitored transfers create blind spots enabling undetected theft; data loss prevention requires transfer monitoring and control.
Question 169:
A security team needs to implement threat intelligence sharing. What frameworks facilitate structured threat intelligence exchange?
A) Share threat information via informal email only
B) Utilize STIX for threat representation and TAXI for transport, enabling standardized, automated threat intelligence sharing within security community
C) Keep all threat intelligence secret without sharing
D) Share intelligence through social media exclusively
Answer: B
Explanation:
Utilizing STIX for threat representation and TAXII for transport enables standardized automated threat intelligence sharing within security community, making option B the correct answer. Structured frameworks make threat sharing actionable and machine-readable improving collective defense. STIX (Structured Threat Information Expression) provides standardized language for representing cyber threat information including indicators of compromise like malicious IPs, domains, and file hashes, tactics techniques and procedures describing attack methods, threat actors identifying adversary groups, campaigns linking related attacks, and courses of action recommending responses. STIX enables consistent threat description across organizations. STIX objects represent threat components including observed data capturing raw information, indicators representing patterns indicating malicious activity, malware characterizing malicious software, attack patterns describing tactics, and relationships connecting objects showing connections between threat elements. Object model creates comprehensive threat descriptions. TAXII (Trusted Automated Exchange of Indicator Information) defines how threat intelligence is shared including collections organizing related threat information, channels for publishing and subscribing, discovery services finding available intelligence sources, and inbox services receiving threat reports. TAXII standardizes transport and exchange. TAXII services enable intelligence distribution through collection management organizing intelligence feeds, polling allowing periodic intelligence retrieval, and push services sending intelligence to subscribers. Multiple services accommodate different sharing patterns. Threat intelligence platforms aggregate and correlate threat data from multiple sources normalizing different formats, deduplicating redundant indicators, enriching data with context, and distributing to security tools. Platforms operationalize shared intelligence. Integration with security tools automates response including SIEM ingestion for correlation, firewall rule updates blocking threats, IDS signature updates detecting attacks, and endpoint protection updates preventing malware. Integration makes intelligence actionable. Trust groups enable targeted sharing through ISACs (Information Sharing and Analysis Centers) facilitating sector-specific exchange, closed communities for sensitive intelligence, and commercial feeds from security vendors. Trust groups ensure appropriate audience. Information confidence levels indicate reliability through source reliability ratings, information accuracy assessments, and confidence scores. Levels help consumers evaluate intelligence quality guiding action. Threat intelligence lifecycle includes collection from diverse sources, processing to normalize and enrich, analysis to identify patterns and attribution, dissemination to stakeholders, and feedback to improve intelligence quality. Lifecycle ensures valuable intelligence. Automation reduces manual effort through API integration enabling machine-to-machine exchange, automated indicator ingestion updating security tools, and orchestration triggering response workflows. Automation speeds intelligence operationalization. Privacy and sensitivity controls protect shared intelligence through TLP (Traffic Light Protocol) indicating sharing boundaries, anonymization removing identifying information, and sanitization removing sensitive details while preserving value. Controls enable appropriate sharing. Option A is incorrect because informal email sharing lacks structure, isn’t machine-readable, requires manual processing, and doesn’t scale effectively for automated security tools. Option C is incorrect because hoarding intelligence prevents collective defense; sharing enables broader protection against threats affecting multiple organizations. Option D is incorrect because social media lacks structure, security, and reliability for sensitive threat intelligence requiring proper channels with access controls.
Question 170:
An analyst needs to investigate a potential insider threat. What behavioral indicators and data sources help detect insider threats?
A) Trust all employees without monitoring
B) Analyze anomalous access patterns, data handling, policy violations, and combine HR data, access logs, and DLP alerts to identify potential insider threats
C) Monitor only external threats ignoring insiders
D) Avoid investigating employees under any circumstances
Answer: B
Explanation:
Analyzing anomalous access, data handling, policy violations, and combining HR data, access logs, and DLP alerts identifies insider threats, making option B the correct answer. Insider threats require different detection approach combining technical monitoring with behavioral analysis and organizational awareness. Access pattern anomalies reveal suspicious behavior including accessing data outside normal job responsibilities, excessive privilege usage beyond typical needs, accessing sensitive data not required for current assignments, or unusual access timing like weekends or nights. Access deviations indicate misuse. Data handling irregularities suggest theft preparation through bulk copying of files, downloads to removable media, large email attachments to personal accounts, or uploads to unauthorized cloud services. Data movement patterns show exfiltration preparation. Policy violations indicate misconduct including accessing prohibited websites, installing unauthorized software, attempting to bypass security controls, or sharing credentials. Violations show disregard for rules potentially preceding malicious activity. Behavioral changes signal potential issues including disgruntlement or dissatisfaction, disciplinary actions or negative reviews, financial difficulties creating motivation, or resignation notice suggesting data theft before departure. Behavioral context provides motivation insights. HR integration correlates security events with personnel actions including recent disciplinary measures, performance improvement plans, announced layoffs, or employment termination. HR data provides context for technical indicators. Privileged user monitoring focuses on high-risk roles including system administrators with broad access, database administrators handling sensitive data, executives accessing confidential information, and developers with code access. Privileged users warrant enhanced scrutiny. User and entity behavior analytics (UEBA) establish baselines and detect deviations through machine learning identifying unusual patterns, peer group analysis comparing to similar users, and risk scoring quantifying threat level. Analytics automate anomaly detection at scale. DLP alerts indicate policy violations and potential theft through sensitive data transfers, rule violations, and content inspection findings. DLP provides visibility into data movement. Physical security integration combines logical and physical monitoring including badge access showing facility entry, CCTV footage providing visual verification, printer monitoring detecting document printing, and visitor logs tracking external contacts. Physical indicators complement logical monitoring. Communication monitoring detects collusion or intelligence gathering through email content analysis, instant message review, and external communication patterns. Communication monitoring reveals coordination or intelligence gathering. Multiple personas usage attempts to hide identity through fake accounts, shared credentials, or proxy connections. Persona analysis reveals attribution attempts. Investigation combines evidence from multiple sources creating comprehensive picture including timeline construction, motive assessment, means verification, and opportunity analysis. Holistic investigation separates malicious intent from innocent mistakes. Interview and investigation procedures include initial evidence gathering, discrete monitoring avoiding alert, coordination with HR and legal, and formal investigation when threshold met. Procedural rigor protects organization legally. Response actions balance security and legal considerations through access revocation, account monitoring before termination, evidence preservation, and coordination with legal counsel. Measured response maintains legal options. Option A is incorrect because blind trust ignores reality that some insiders pose threats whether malicious or negligent; appropriate monitoring protects organization. Option C is incorrect because insider threats often cause more damage than external attacks having authorized access, knowledge, and trust. Option D is incorrect because failing to investigate credible insider threat indicators exposes organization to data theft, sabotage, or fraud.
Question 171:
A security analyst is examining Windows Event Logs for security incidents. What event IDs indicate potentially malicious activity?
A) All event IDs are equally important without prioritization
B) Focus on critical event IDs including 4624/4625 for logon events, 4720/4726 for account changes, 4672 for privileged logon, and 1102 for audit log clearing
C) Event logs provide no security value
D) Monitor only application errors ignoring security events
Answer: B
Explanation:
Focusing on critical event IDs like 4624/4625 for logons, 4720/4726 for accounts, 4672 for privileged access, and 1102 for log clearing identifies malicious activity, making option B the correct answer. Specific Windows events provide high-fidelity indicators of compromise or policy violations requiring prioritized monitoring. Logon events (4624 successful, 4625 failed) show authentication activity including logon type indicating how authentication occurred (interactive, network, service), account name identifying user, source information showing origin, and timestamps enabling timeline construction. Unusual logon patterns indicate compromise or brute force attacks. Account management events track user modifications including 4720 for account creation, 4722 for account enablement, 4723 for password changes, 4724 for password reset, 4726 for account deletion, and 4738 for account changes. Account modifications reveal persistence attempts or privilege escalation. Privileged use events (4672) identify administrative activity logging when accounts are assigned powerful privileges. Privileged logons warrant scrutiny as they indicate administrative actions that could be legitimate or malicious. Security log clearing (1102) indicates audit trail tampering as attackers delete logs covering their tracks. Log clearing is strong indicator of compromise. Group membership changes (4728, 4732, 4756) show additions to security groups especially privileged groups like administrators. Group manipulation enables privilege escalation or persistence. Scheduled task events (4698 creation, 4699 modification, 4702 update) reveal persistence mechanisms as attackers create scheduled tasks for recurring code execution. Task events show automation of malicious activity. Service installation events (4697) identify new services including those used for persistence, backdoors, or malware. Service creation warrants investigation especially for system-level services. Special privilege assignment (4672) combined with unusual accounts suggests privilege abuse or compromised privileged accounts. Policy changes (4719) indicate security policy modifications potentially weakening security controls. Policy tampering enables subsequent attacks. Registry modifications tracked through Sysmon (Event ID 13) show persistence mechanisms, configuration changes, and security bypass attempts. Registry changes are common malware behavior. Process creation events (4688 or Sysmon Event ID 1) log new processes including command-line arguments revealing intentions. Process monitoring detects malicious execution, living-off-the-land techniques, and PowerShell abuse. Network connection events (Sysmon Event ID 3) track outbound connections showing command-and-control communications, data exfiltration, and lateral movement. Network events reveal attacker infrastructure. File creation events (Sysmon Event ID 11) detect malware dropped to disk, backdoor installation, or data staging for exfiltration. File system monitoring catches file-based persistence. Correlation across multiple event types creates attack narrative combining logon followed by privilege escalation, lateral movement, and data access forming complete attack chain. Correlation identifies sophisticated attacks. Baseline establishment defines normal activity levels and patterns enabling deviation detection. Baseline understanding separates routine administrative activity from anomalies. Automated alerting triggers on suspicious patterns including failed logon thresholds, off-hours administrative activity, or rapid account modifications. Automation enables timely detection. Retention and centralization collect logs from all systems to central SIEM enabling correlation, long-term retention supporting investigations, and backup protection preventing attacker log deletion. Centralization enables enterprise visibility. Option A is incorrect because prioritizing high-value events focuses limited analysis resources on most security-relevant indicators rather than overwhelming with all events. Option C is incorrect because event logs provide critical forensic evidence and real-time detection when properly monitored and analyzed. Option D is incorrect because security events specifically capture authentication, authorization, and policy changes most relevant to detecting compromise.
Question 172:
Which protocol is used to secure communication between a web browser and a web server?
A) FTP
B) HTTPS
C) SMTP
D) Telnet
Answer: B
Explanation:
HTTPS (Hypertext Transfer Protocol Secure) is the protocol specifically designed to secure communication between a web browser and a web server. It combines the standard HTTP protocol with SSL/TLS (Secure Sockets Layer/Transport Layer Security) encryption to ensure that data transmitted between the client and server remains confidential and protected from interception. When a user accesses a website using HTTPS, all data exchanged including login credentials, personal information, and payment details is encrypted, making it extremely difficult for attackers to read or modify the information in transit. The HTTPS protocol operates on port 443 by default and is essential for protecting sensitive transactions in e-commerce, online banking, and any website handling user authentication.
A is incorrect because FTP (File Transfer Protocol) is used for transferring files between systems over a network but does not provide encryption or security for web communications. While FTPS and SFTP are secure versions of file transfer protocols, they are not used for browser-to-server web communications. C is incorrect because SMTP (Simple Mail Transfer Protocol) is used for sending and routing email messages between mail servers, not for securing web browser communications. D is incorrect because Telnet is a protocol used for remote command-line access to network devices and systems, and it transmits data in clear text without any encryption, making it highly insecure for any type of communication.
Question 173:
What is the primary purpose of a Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) system?
A) To provide firewall protection
B) To aggregate and analyze security logs from multiple sources
C) To encrypt network traffic
D) To perform vulnerability scanning
Answer: B
Explanation:
A SIEM system’s primary purpose is to aggregate and analyze security logs from multiple sources across an organization’s IT infrastructure. SIEM solutions collect log data from various security devices, network equipment, servers, applications, and endpoints, then correlate and analyze this information in real-time to identify potential security incidents, threats, and anomalies. The system provides centralized visibility into security events, enabling security operations center analysts to detect suspicious activities, investigate incidents, and respond to threats more effectively. SIEM platforms use advanced correlation rules, machine learning, and threat intelligence to identify patterns that might indicate a security breach or ongoing attack. They also provide valuable reporting and compliance capabilities, helping organizations meet regulatory requirements by maintaining comprehensive audit trails of security events.
A is incorrect because providing firewall protection is the function of network firewalls, not SIEM systems. While a SIEM can collect and analyze logs from firewalls, it does not perform firewall functions itself. C is incorrect because encrypting network traffic is typically handled by VPNs, SSL/TLS protocols, and encryption appliances, not by SIEM systems. D is incorrect because performing vulnerability scanning is the primary function of vulnerability assessment tools and scanners, not SIEM systems. While SIEM can integrate with vulnerability scanners and use their data for correlation, it does not conduct the actual vulnerability scanning process.
Question 174:
Which type of malware is specifically designed to encrypt a victim’s files and demand payment for decryption?
A) Trojan
B) Worm
C) Ransomware
D) Spyware
Answer: C
Explanation:
Ransomware is a specific type of malware explicitly designed to encrypt a victim’s files, systems, or entire networks and then demand payment, typically in cryptocurrency, for the decryption key needed to restore access. This malicious software has become one of the most significant cybersecurity threats facing organizations and individuals. Once ransomware infects a system, it rapidly encrypts important files using strong encryption algorithms, making them inaccessible to the user. The attackers then display a ransom note demanding payment within a specified timeframe, often threatening to permanently delete the decryption key or leak sensitive data if payment is not made. Modern ransomware variants often employ double extortion tactics, where attackers not only encrypt data but also exfiltrate it, threatening to publish sensitive information publicly if the ransom is not paid. Organizations must implement robust backup strategies, security controls, and incident response plans to defend against and recover from ransomware attacks.
A is incorrect because a Trojan is malware that disguises itself as legitimate software to trick users into installing it, but it does not specifically encrypt files for ransom. B is incorrect because a worm is self-replicating malware that spreads across networks without user intervention, but its primary purpose is propagation rather than file encryption and extortion. D is incorrect because spyware is designed to secretly monitor user activities and collect information without consent, not to encrypt files and demand ransom payments.
Question 175:
What does the term “indicator of compromise” (IoC) refer to in cybersecurity?
A) A metric measuring network bandwidth
B) Evidence that a security breach has occurred
C) A tool for encrypting sensitive data
D) A method for authenticating users
Answer: B
Explanation:
An Indicator of Compromise (IoC) refers to forensic evidence or artifacts that suggest a security breach, intrusion, or malicious activity has occurred or is currently occurring on a network or system. IoCs are critical pieces of information that security analysts use to detect, investigate, and respond to cyber threats. Common examples of IoCs include suspicious IP addresses, malicious file hashes, unusual domain names, registry key modifications, unexpected network traffic patterns, and abnormal user account behaviors. Security teams collect and analyze IoCs from various sources including security tools, threat intelligence feeds, and incident investigations to identify compromised systems and prevent further damage. Modern security operations centers leverage threat intelligence platforms that aggregate IoCs from multiple sources, allowing organizations to proactively hunt for threats and implement defensive measures. IoCs can be categorized as atomic (cannot be broken down further, like IP addresses), computed (derived from data, like hash values), or behavioral (collections of atomic and computed indicators that describe attacker tactics).
A is incorrect because metrics measuring network bandwidth are performance indicators related to network capacity and utilization, not security compromises. C is incorrect because tools for encrypting sensitive data are security controls used to protect information confidentiality, not indicators of compromise. D is incorrect because methods for authenticating users are security mechanisms that verify user identities, not evidence of security breaches or compromises.
Question 176:
Which of the following is a characteristic of asymmetric encryption?
A) Uses the same key for encryption and decryption
B) Uses different keys for encryption and decryption
C) Does not require any keys
D) Is faster than symmetric encryption
Answer: B
Explanation:
Asymmetric encryption, also known as public-key cryptography, is characterized by using different keys for encryption and decryption operations. This cryptographic system employs a mathematically related key pair consisting of a public key and a private key. The public key can be freely shared and is used to encrypt data, while the private key must be kept secret and is used to decrypt data encrypted with the corresponding public key. This fundamental characteristic enables several important security functions including secure communication between parties who have never met, digital signatures for authentication and non-repudiation, and key exchange mechanisms. Common asymmetric encryption algorithms include RSA, Elliptic Curve Cryptography, and Diffie-Hellman. The mathematical relationship between the key pair ensures that data encrypted with one key can only be decrypted with its corresponding paired key, providing strong security. While asymmetric encryption offers significant advantages in key distribution and management, it is computationally intensive compared to symmetric encryption.
A is incorrect because using the same key for encryption and decryption is the defining characteristic of symmetric encryption, not asymmetric encryption. C is incorrect because asymmetric encryption absolutely requires keys, specifically a public-private key pair, to function. D is incorrect because asymmetric encryption is actually slower and more computationally expensive than symmetric encryption due to the complex mathematical operations involved in the encryption and decryption processes.
Question 177:
What is the purpose of a honeynet in cybersecurity?
A) To accelerate network traffic
B) To attract and monitor attackers in a controlled environment
C) To encrypt all network communications
D) To serve as a backup network
Answer: B
Explanation:
A honeynet is a network of honeypot systems specifically designed to attract and monitor attackers in a controlled environment where their activities can be safely observed and analyzed. Unlike a single honeypot, which is typically an individual decoy system, a honeynet consists of multiple interconnected systems that simulate a realistic network environment, making it more convincing to potential attackers. The primary purpose of a honeynet is to gather intelligence about attacker tactics, techniques, and procedures, understand emerging threats, and study malware behavior without risking production systems. Security researchers and organizations deploy honeynets to divert attackers away from legitimate systems, waste attacker resources, collect forensic evidence, and improve their defensive capabilities based on observed attack patterns. Honeynets are carefully isolated from production networks using containment mechanisms to prevent attackers from using them as launching points for attacks against real systems. The data collected from honeynets provides valuable threat intelligence that helps organizations better understand the threat landscape and enhance their security posture.
A is incorrect because accelerating network traffic is the function of performance optimization tools and technologies, not honeynets. C is incorrect because encrypting all network communications is accomplished through VPNs and encryption protocols, not honeynets. D is incorrect because serving as a backup network is the purpose of redundant network infrastructure and disaster recovery systems, not honeynets which are intentionally designed to be attacked.
Question 178:
Which command-line tool is commonly used on Windows systems to display active network connections and listening ports?
A) ipconfig
B) netstat
C) tracert
D) nslookup
Answer: B
Explanation:
The netstat command is the standard command-line tool used on Windows systems to display active network connections, listening ports, routing tables, and various network statistics. This powerful utility provides security analysts and network administrators with crucial information about current network activity on a system. By running netstat with various parameters, users can view all active TCP and UDP connections, identify which ports are open and listening for incoming connections, see which processes are associated with specific network connections, and monitor network interface statistics. Security professionals frequently use netstat during incident investigations to identify suspicious connections, detect unauthorized services listening on ports, and verify legitimate network activity. Common netstat command options include displaying all connections and listening ports, showing the owning process ID for each connection, and displaying addresses and port numbers in numerical form. The tool is invaluable for troubleshooting network issues and conducting security assessments.
A is incorrect because ipconfig is used to display and manage IP configuration information for network interfaces, including IP addresses, subnet masks, and default gateways, but it does not show active connections or listening ports. C is incorrect because tracert (trace route) is used to display the path that packets take to reach a destination host, showing each hop along the route, but it does not display local network connections or ports. D is incorrect because nslookup is a DNS query tool used to obtain domain name or IP address mapping information from DNS servers, not for displaying network connections or ports.
Question 179:
What type of attack involves overwhelming a target system with traffic to make it unavailable to legitimate users?
A) Phishing
B) Man-in-the-middle
C) Denial of Service
D) SQL injection
Answer: C
Explanation:
A Denial of Service attack involves overwhelming a target system, network, or service with excessive traffic or requests to make it unavailable to legitimate users. The primary goal of a DoS attack is to exhaust system resources such as bandwidth, processing power, memory, or connection capacity, causing the target to become unresponsive or crash entirely. These attacks can be launched from a single source or, more commonly in modern attacks, from multiple distributed sources in what is called a Distributed Denial of Service attack. DoS attacks employ various techniques including flooding attacks that send massive volumes of traffic, protocol exploitation attacks that abuse weaknesses in network protocols, and application-layer attacks that target specific vulnerabilities in web applications or services. The impact of successful DoS attacks can be severe, resulting in lost revenue, damaged reputation, and disruption of critical services. Organizations implement multiple defense strategies against DoS attacks including traffic filtering, rate limiting, load balancing, and specialized DDoS mitigation services that can absorb and filter malicious traffic before it reaches the target infrastructure.
A is incorrect because phishing is a social engineering attack that attempts to trick users into revealing sensitive information or credentials through deceptive emails or websites, not overwhelming systems with traffic. B is incorrect because a man-in-the-middle attack involves intercepting and potentially altering communications between two parties without their knowledge, not making systems unavailable through traffic flooding. D is incorrect because SQL injection is a code injection attack that exploits vulnerabilities in database-driven applications to execute malicious SQL commands, not overwhelming systems with traffic.
Question 180:
Which security principle states that users should only have access to the resources necessary to perform their job functions?
A) Defense in depth
B) Least privilege
C) Separation of duties
D) Due diligence
Answer: B
Explanation:
The principle of least privilege is a fundamental security concept stating that users, processes, and systems should only have access to the resources, data, and privileges necessary to perform their specific job functions or tasks, and nothing more. This principle minimizes potential damage from accidents, errors, or malicious actions by limiting the scope of what any single user or process can access or modify. Implementing least privilege involves carefully analyzing job roles and responsibilities, assigning appropriate permissions based on actual needs, regularly reviewing and adjusting access rights as roles change, and removing unnecessary privileges promptly. This approach significantly reduces the attack surface by ensuring that compromised accounts have limited access, preventing lateral movement within networks, and containing potential breaches. Organizations apply least privilege across multiple layers including operating system permissions, application access, database privileges, and network resources. The principle also extends to administrative accounts, where even system administrators should use standard user accounts for routine tasks and only elevate privileges when performing specific administrative functions.
A is incorrect because defense in depth is a security strategy that implements multiple layers of security controls throughout an IT system, not specifically about limiting user access to necessary resources. C is incorrect because separation of duties is a security principle that divides critical functions among different individuals to prevent fraud and errors, not about limiting access to only what is necessary. D is incorrect because due diligence refers to the ongoing effort to maintain and improve security practices, not the specific principle of limiting user access to necessary resources.
