Visit here for our full Cisco 200-201 exam dumps and practice test questions.
Question 61:
A security analyst is investigating a phishing email and needs to analyze the suspicious attachment without risking infection. Which analysis approach should be used?
A) Open the attachment on the production workstation
B) Use a sandbox environment or isolated virtual machine to safely analyze the attachment’s behavior
C) Forward the attachment to colleagues for review
D) Delete the attachment without analysis
Answer: B
Explanation:
Using a sandbox environment or isolated virtual machine provides safe malware analysis because sandboxes are isolated environments where suspicious files can be executed and observed without risking the production network. The sandbox monitors file behavior including process creation, network connections, registry modifications, and file system changes. This controlled analysis reveals malicious capabilities like data exfiltration, command-and-control communication, or encryption activity. Modern sandboxes provide automated analysis generating reports on suspicious behaviors, and many integrate with threat intelligence platforms to identify known malware families. Virtual machines offer similar isolation allowing analysts to take snapshots before execution and restore clean states after analysis. The sandbox should not have network connectivity to production systems, preventing lateral movement if malware attempts to spread. Best practices include analyzing attachments in environments matching target systems (same OS and applications), monitoring all system activities during execution, comparing behavior against baseline system activity, and documenting findings for incident response. Organizations should use sandboxes for all suspicious attachments, links, and executables before allowing them in production environments.
Option A is incorrect because opening attachments on production workstations risks immediate infection, potentially compromising systems and data. Malware could encrypt files, steal credentials, or spread to other systems. Option C is incorrect because forwarding suspicious attachments spreads potential threats to additional users who might inadvertently execute malware. Option D is incorrect because deletion without analysis eliminates evidence needed to understand the threat, identify affected systems, and improve defenses against future similar attacks.
Question 62:
During incident response, a security analyst needs to collect volatile data from a potentially compromised system. What is the correct order of volatility for data collection?
A) Hard drive, network connections, RAM, running processes
B) Registers, cache, RAM, network connections, running processes, hard drive
C) Hard drive only without collecting other data
D) Random order without considering volatility
Answer: B
Explanation:
Collecting data in order of volatility from most to least volatile ensures critical evidence is preserved because volatile data is lost when systems are powered down or processes terminate. The order of volatility follows: CPU registers and cache (most volatile, lost immediately when processes end), RAM contents including running processes and network connections (lost on power loss), temporary file systems and swap space, hard drive data and system logs (persistent but can be modified), and remote logging and archived data (least volatile). During incident response, analysts should capture volatile data first using live forensic tools before shutting down systems. RAM captures include running processes, loaded modules, open files, network connections, and encryption keys. Network connection data shows active communications with potential command-and-control servers. Process information reveals malicious executables and their behaviors. This methodology preserves maximum evidence for investigation. Tools like FTK Imager or Magnet RAM Capturer collect volatile data, while write-blockers protect hard drive evidence during imaging. Proper documentation of collection times, tools, and custody chain maintains evidence integrity for potential legal proceedings.
Option A is incorrect because it reverses the correct order, prioritizing persistent data over volatile data that could be lost. Option C is incorrect because collecting only hard drive data misses volatile evidence like active malware processes, network connections to attackers, and RAM artifacts that disappear when systems shut down. Option D is incorrect because random collection order risks losing volatile evidence before capture, compromising investigation completeness and potentially allowing attackers to erase traces of compromise.
Question 63:
A SOC analyst receives an alert about unusual outbound traffic from an internal server to an external IP address. What should be the FIRST step in investigating this alert?
A) Immediately block the external IP address without investigation
B) Verify the alert by examining network logs to confirm the traffic, identify the process/application generating traffic, and determine if the destination is known malicious
C) Ignore the alert as a false positive
D) Shutdown the server immediately
Answer: B
Explanation:
Verifying the alert through log examination and traffic analysis provides context before taking action because not all unusual traffic indicates compromise. Initial verification includes reviewing firewall logs, proxy logs, and NetFlow data to confirm the alert’s accuracy and gather details about the communication. Analysts should identify the source process or application generating traffic, determine connection frequency and data volumes, check if the destination IP has threat intelligence associations, and verify whether the traffic matches known legitimate business applications. Tools like Wireshark can capture and analyze packet contents. Threat intelligence platforms check if destinations are known command-and-control servers or malicious infrastructure. Process analysis identifies which application initiated the connection, distinguishing legitimate cloud services from malware. This verification prevents disrupting legitimate business operations based on false positives while quickly identifying genuine threats. If investigation confirms malicious activity, escalation follows established incident response procedures including containment, eradication, and recovery. Documentation of investigation steps maintains audit trails and supports potential legal actions.
Option A is incorrect because immediately blocking IPs without investigation risks disrupting legitimate business services and doesn’t address potential malware on the internal system that could find alternative communication methods. Option C is incorrect because dismissing alerts without investigation allows real threats to persist, potentially leading to data breaches or system compromises. Option D is incorrect because immediately shutting down servers disrupts business operations and destroys volatile evidence needed for thorough investigation and root cause analysis.
Question 64:
An organization detects ransomware has encrypted files on multiple systems. What should be the immediate containment action?
A) Pay the ransom immediately to decrypt files
B) Isolate infected systems from the network to prevent ransomware spread, disable compromised accounts, and activate incident response plan
C) Continue normal operations while investigating
D) Delete all backups to prevent infection spread
Answer: B
Explanation:
Isolating infected systems and disabling compromised accounts prevents ransomware spread because modern ransomware actively propagates through networks, encrypting additional systems and potentially reaching backups. Immediate containment includes disconnecting infected systems from network (physically or via switch port shutdown), disabling compromised user and service accounts that ransomware might use for lateral movement, blocking ransomware command-and-control communications at the firewall, and identifying and isolating additional potentially infected systems. Organizations should activate incident response plans including assembling response teams, notifying management and legal counsel, and documenting all actions. Security teams should preserve evidence for forensics while preventing further damage. Containment prioritizes limiting business impact over immediate recovery. After containment, eradication removes ransomware from systems, and recovery restores operations from clean backups. Organizations should assess whether to report incidents to law enforcement and regulatory authorities. Paying ransoms is discouraged because it funds criminal enterprises, doesn’t guarantee file recovery, and may encourage future attacks.
Option A is incorrect because paying ransoms doesn’t guarantee file decryption, funds criminal activity, makes organizations targets for repeat attacks, and doesn’t address vulnerabilities that allowed initial compromise. Option C is incorrect because continuing operations during active ransomware incidents allows further spread, increases encrypted data volumes, and potentially compromises additional systems including backups. Option D is incorrect because deleting backups eliminates the primary recovery method, leaving organizations dependent on paying ransoms or accepting permanent data loss.
Question 65:
A security analyst needs to determine if a file is malicious by checking its hash against known malware databases. Which hash algorithm is most commonly used for malware identification?
A) Base64 encoding
B) MD5 or SHA-256 hash algorithms that create unique identifiers for files
C) ROT13 cipher
D) XOR encryption
Answer: B
Explanation:
MD5 and SHA-256 hash algorithms create unique file identifiers that malware databases use for threat identification because hash functions generate fixed-length values (fingerprints) from file contents. Identical files always produce identical hashes, while even minor file modifications create completely different hashes. Security analysts calculate hashes of suspicious files using tools like CertUtil or Get-FileHash and compare them against threat intelligence databases like VirusTotal, which aggregates results from dozens of antivirus engines. Hash matches indicate known malware, while mismatches suggest potentially new threats requiring deeper analysis. SHA-256 is preferred over MD5 for new implementations because MD5 has known collision vulnerabilities, though both remain useful for malware identification. Organizations maintain internal hash databases of approved software creating application whitelists, and known malware creating blacklists. Threat intelligence feeds provide updated malware hashes. Limitations include that attackers can modify malware binaries to change hashes while preserving functionality, requiring complementary analysis methods like behavioral analysis and YARA rules that identify malware based on code patterns rather than exact file matching.
Option A is incorrect because Base64 is an encoding scheme that converts binary data to ASCII text, not a hash function, and doesn’t create unique file identifiers for malware detection. Option C is incorrect because ROT13 is a simple substitution cipher that shifts letters by 13 positions, used for obfuscation not cryptographic hashing. Option D is incorrect because XOR is a logical operation sometimes used in malware encryption or encoding, but not for creating file identification hashes used in malware databases.
Question 66:
An analyst is reviewing firewall logs and notices repeated failed login attempts from multiple IP addresses targeting the same administrative account. What type of attack is this?
A) Man-in-the-middle attack
B) Distributed brute force attack attempting to guess the administrative account password
C) SQL injection attack
D) Cross-site scripting attack
Answer: B
Explanation:
Distributed brute force attacks use multiple source IPs to attempt password guessing against accounts while evading single-source detection thresholds. Attackers distribute attempts across botnets or proxy networks, making each individual IP appear less suspicious while collectively mounting significant attack volumes against target accounts. This pattern indicates credential stuffing using known username-password combinations from previous breaches, or dictionary attacks trying common passwords. The distributed nature helps avoid account lockouts and rate limiting that would trigger on single-source attacks. Defensive measures include implementing account lockout policies after failed attempts, using multi-factor authentication for administrative accounts, monitoring for distributed attack patterns across source IPs, implementing CAPTCHA or similar challenges after failed attempts, and restricting administrative access to specific trusted networks. Security teams should alert on multiple failed authentication attempts regardless of source distribution, investigate whether targeted accounts use weak passwords, and review logs for successful authentications from unusual locations that might indicate compromised credentials. Organizations should enforce strong password policies, regular password rotation, and privileged access management solutions for administrative accounts.
Option A is incorrect because man-in-the-middle attacks intercept communications between parties rather than repeatedly attempting authentication. Option C is incorrect because SQL injection exploits database query vulnerabilities to extract or manipulate data, not authentication mechanisms. Option D is incorrect because cross-site scripting injects malicious scripts into web applications to attack users’ browsers, unrelated to authentication attempts.
Question 67:
During threat hunting, an analyst searches for indicators of lateral movement within the network. Which activity would indicate lateral movement?
A) Users accessing their assigned file shares during business hours
B) Administrative tools like PsExec or RDP connections between internal systems, especially from non-IT accounts
C) Routine software updates from approved repositories
D) Scheduled backup operations
Answer: B
Explanation:
Administrative tools like PsExec or RDP used between internal systems indicate potential lateral movement because attackers use these tools to spread through networks after initial compromise. Legitimate IT administrators use these tools for system management, but when non-IT accounts or unusual systems initiate these connections, they suggest malicious activity. Indicators include RDP sessions from workstations to servers or between workstations, PsExec executions from non-administrative systems, unusual Service Control Manager (SCM) operations creating services on remote systems, and authentication attempts using stolen credentials. Attackers use lateral movement to access sensitive data, escalate privileges, and establish persistence across multiple systems. Detection requires baseline understanding of normal administrative patterns. Threat hunting queries search Windows Event Logs for Event ID 4624 (successful logons) with logon type 10 (RDP) or type 3 (network) from unexpected sources, examine logs for PsExec indicators like service installations named PSEXESVC, and analyze authentication patterns for accounts accessing numerous systems rapidly. EDR solutions provide visibility into process creation, network connections, and credential usage across endpoints. Organizations should implement least privilege principles limiting administrative tool usage to authorized personnel.
Option A is incorrect because users accessing assigned file shares during business hours represents normal legitimate behavior. Option C is incorrect because routine software updates from approved repositories are expected system maintenance activities. Option D is incorrect because scheduled backup operations are legitimate administrative activities that don’t indicate malicious lateral movement.
Question 68:
An organization wants to improve detection of advanced persistent threats (APTs). Which security control provides the best visibility into APT activity?
A) Antivirus software alone
B) Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions providing continuous monitoring, behavioral analysis, and threat hunting capabilities
C) Basic firewall logs
D) Perimeter-based defenses only
Answer: B
Explanation:
Endpoint Detection and Response solutions provide comprehensive APT detection because APTs use sophisticated techniques that evade traditional security controls. EDR continuously monitors endpoints collecting telemetry on processes, network connections, file modifications, registry changes, and user activities. Behavioral analysis identifies anomalous activities like unusual process relationships, suspicious PowerShell executions, or abnormal network connections. EDR detects fileless malware, living-off-the-land techniques using legitimate tools, and zero-day exploits that signature-based antivirus misses. Threat hunting capabilities allow analysts to proactively search for indicators of compromise across all endpoints. EDR provides detailed forensic data enabling investigation of attack timelines, affected systems, and attacker techniques. Integration with threat intelligence enriches detections with context about known APT groups and campaigns. EDR response capabilities include isolating compromised systems, killing malicious processes, and preventing execution of suspicious binaries. Organizations should combine EDR with network detection, security information and event management (SIEM), and user behavior analytics for defense-in-depth. Regular threat hunting exercises using EDR data improve detection of stealthy persistence mechanisms and lateral movement that automated rules miss.
Option A is incorrect because antivirus relies on signature-based detection that APTs easily evade using custom malware, encryption, and polymorphic techniques. Option C is incorrect because basic firewall logs provide limited visibility into endpoint activities and don’t detect malicious behaviors within allowed traffic. Option D is incorrect because perimeter defenses alone can’t detect APTs that breach perimeters through social engineering, supply chain attacks, or zero-days, and miss internal lateral movement.
Question 69:
A security analyst receives a SIEM alert indicating multiple failed VPN authentication attempts followed by a successful login from an unusual geographic location. What is the most appropriate response?
A) Ignore the alert as the login was eventually successful
B) Investigate by verifying user’s actual location, reviewing account activity, checking for impossible travel scenarios, and potentially disabling the account pending investigation
C) Immediately delete the user account
D) Only change the password without further investigation
Answer: B
Explanation:
Investigating by verifying location, reviewing activity, checking travel scenarios, and potentially disabling accounts provides appropriate response because successful authentication after multiple failures from unusual locations suggests credential compromise. Investigation steps include contacting the user through alternate communication channels to verify they initiated the access, reviewing recent account activities for unauthorized actions, checking if the location matches the user’s known travel or work patterns, analyzing if the timeline shows impossible travel between geographic locations, and examining systems accessed and data viewed during the suspicious session. Impossible travel occurs when an account shows logins from distant locations within timeframes physically impossible without air travel. This strongly indicates credential compromise with multiple actors using the same credentials. Analysts should review authentication logs for patterns suggesting credential stuffing or brute force attacks. If investigation confirms unauthorized access, organizations should immediately disable the account preventing further misuse, force password reset on secure channels, revoke active sessions, notify the user of compromise, scan for malware on user’s devices, and review logs for data exfiltration or privilege escalation. Implementing multi-factor authentication prevents compromised passwords from enabling unauthorized access.
Option A is incorrect because ignoring successful logins after failed attempts and from unusual locations allows compromised accounts to continue operating, risking data theft and further compromise. Option C is incorrect because immediately deleting accounts without investigation loses forensic evidence and may impact legitimate user access if the alert was false positive. Option D is incorrect because only changing passwords without investigating the compromise extent misses potential malware installations or data exfiltration that occurred during unauthorized access.
Question 70:
An analyst needs to analyze network traffic for potential data exfiltration. Which network protocol or behavior would be most suspicious for large data transfers?
A) HTTPS traffic to well-known cloud storage services during business hours
B) DNS tunneling using unusually long domain queries or high volumes of DNS requests for data exfiltration
C) Standard email traffic within normal business patterns
D) Routine software updates from vendor websites
Answer: B
Explanation:
DNS tunneling using unusual query patterns indicates potential data exfiltration because attackers abuse DNS, which is rarely blocked or inspected, to covertly transmit data. DNS tunneling encodes exfiltrated data into DNS queries and responses, bypassing traditional data loss prevention controls. Suspicious DNS indicators include unusually long domain names containing random-appearing strings, high volumes of DNS requests to uncommon domains, requests for TXT records containing large amounts of data, and DNS traffic to domains recently registered or with suspicious WHOIS information. Normal DNS queries are short and infrequent, while tunneling generates continuous queries with maximum-length labels. Detection requires analyzing DNS traffic for statistical anomalies like excessive queries per host, unusual query types, long subdomain strings, and high entropy domain names suggesting encoded data. Organizations should monitor DNS query volumes per endpoint, implement DNS filtering blocking known tunneling domains, and analyze DNS traffic patterns against baselines. Tools like passive DNS analysis and DNS firewalls detect tunneling. Prevention includes restricting DNS queries to authorized resolvers, implementing DNS sinkholing for known malicious domains, and monitoring for unusual DNS traffic patterns that deviate from legitimate name resolution.
Option A is incorrect because HTTPS to cloud storage during business hours can be legitimate business activity depending on organizational policies. Option C is incorrect because standard email within normal patterns represents expected business communications. Option D is incorrect because routine software updates from vendors are legitimate maintenance activities, though organizations should verify update sources match expected vendor domains.
Question 71:
A SOC team needs to prioritize incident response when multiple security alerts occur simultaneously. What factor should primarily determine incident priority?
A) The order alerts were received
B) Business impact and criticality of affected systems, potential for data loss, and scope of compromise
C) Personal preferences of security analysts
D) Random selection
Answer: B
Explanation:
Business impact and system criticality determine incident priority because security operations must align with organizational objectives and risk tolerance. Prioritization considers the criticality of affected systems (production vs. development), sensitivity of potentially compromised data (customer information, intellectual property, financial data), scope of compromise (single workstation vs. multiple critical servers), active vs. potential threats (ongoing attacks vs. indicators requiring investigation), and regulatory requirements for certain data types. High-priority incidents include ransomware actively encrypting systems, suspected data exfiltration of sensitive information, compromise of critical infrastructure, and attacks targeting executive accounts. Lower priority incidents might include policy violations without immediate security impact or isolated malware detections on non-critical systems. Organizations should maintain classification schemes defining incident categories and response times. Factors include confidence in detection accuracy, attacker capabilities based on observed techniques, potential business disruption if incidents escalate, and resources required for response. Asset inventories document system criticality enabling rapid priority decisions. Incident response plans should define escalation thresholds and decision authority. Regular risk assessments update criticality ratings reflecting business changes. SOC teams balance rapid response to critical threats while ensuring all incidents receive appropriate attention.
Option A is incorrect because order of alert receipt doesn’t reflect actual threat severity or business impact. Option C is incorrect because personal preferences introduce inconsistency and don’t align with organizational risk management. Option D is incorrect because random selection ignores threat severity and business impacts, potentially allowing critical incidents to escalate while resources focus on minor issues.
Question 72:
An analyst is investigating a malware incident and finds the malware connects to a command-and-control server. What information about the C2 server is most valuable for threat intelligence?
A) Only the time of day the connection occurred
B) IP address, domain name, infrastructure details, communication protocols, and associated malware families
C) The font used in the malware code comments
D) Malware file icon
Answer: B
Explanation:
IP addresses, domains, infrastructure details, protocols, and malware families provide actionable threat intelligence because this information enables detecting and blocking additional instances of the same threat campaign. C2 infrastructure intelligence includes IP addresses and domain names used for communication, network protocols and ports utilized, SSL certificates and associated infrastructure, hosting providers and geographic locations, and registration information for domains. Analysts correlate C2 infrastructure with known malware families, APT groups, and campaigns, enabling attribution and understanding of attacker capabilities. This intelligence informs defensive actions including blocking communications to identified C2 servers, creating detection rules for specific C2 communication patterns, identifying other potentially compromised systems communicating with the same infrastructure, and sharing indicators with the security community. Threat intelligence platforms aggregate C2 information from multiple sources including commercial feeds, open-source intelligence, and security vendor research. Organizations implement tactical blocks of known malicious infrastructure while developing strategic understanding of adversary infrastructure patterns. C2 analysis reveals attacker operational security through examination of infrastructure reuse, domain registration patterns, and hosting choices. Advanced techniques include active reconnaissance of C2 servers and sinkholing to identify infected systems.
Option A is incorrect because connection timing alone provides minimal intelligence value without infrastructure details enabling defensive actions. Option C is incorrect because code comment fonts are irrelevant to threat intelligence and defensive operations. Option D is incorrect because malware file icons don’t provide actionable intelligence for detection, blocking, or understanding threat actor capabilities.
Question 73:
A user reports their system is running slowly, and investigation reveals a cryptocurrency mining application running. What type of threat is this?
A) Ransomware
B) Cryptojacking malware consuming system resources to mine cryptocurrency without user consent
C) Phishing attack
D) SQL injection
Answer: B
Explanation:
Cryptojacking malware mines cryptocurrency using victim resources without permission or knowledge. This malware consumes CPU and GPU cycles, degrading system performance and increasing electricity costs. Cryptojacking operates through malicious software installations, browser-based mining scripts on compromised websites, and exploitation of system vulnerabilities. Indicators include high CPU utilization when systems should be idle, elevated temperatures and fan noise from intensive processing, slow application performance, and unexplained increases in electricity consumption. Detection requires monitoring for known mining processes, unusual CPU utilization patterns, network connections to mining pools, and suspicious processes running JavaScript or mining applications. Browser-based cryptojacking executes within web browsers using JavaScript, often persisting through pop-under windows that remain hidden. Prevention includes deploying ad blockers and anti-mining browser extensions, implementing application whitelisting to prevent unauthorized software execution, monitoring CPU utilization and investigating anomalies, and educating users about risks of visiting untrusted websites. Cryptojacking often indicates initial system compromise through which attackers could deploy additional malware. Organizations should investigate how cryptojacking malware was introduced, remove all attacker persistence mechanisms, and assess whether additional malicious activities occurred during compromise period.
Option A is incorrect because ransomware encrypts files and demands payment for decryption rather than mining cryptocurrency. Option C is incorrect because phishing attacks involve social engineering to steal credentials or distribute malware, not cryptocurrency mining operations. Option D is incorrect because SQL injection exploits database vulnerabilities rather than installing mining software on systems.
Question 74:
During log analysis, an analyst notices a user account was created outside business hours and immediately added to the Administrators group. What should be the analyst’s response?
A) Assume it was legitimate IT activity without verification
B) Investigate immediately as this indicates potential unauthorized privilege escalation, verify with IT administrators, review related logs, and disable suspicious accounts
C) Wait for the next business day to investigate
D) Delete all administrator accounts
Answer: B
Explanation:
Immediate investigation is required because unauthorized account creation with elevated privileges indicates compromise, with attackers establishing persistent access through privileged accounts. Investigation includes verifying with IT administration whether the account creation was authorized and follows change management procedures, reviewing security logs for authentication events, process executions, and privilege changes around the account creation time, identifying which account performed the creation and whether that account was compromised, checking for other suspicious activities from the same source, and examining the new account’s usage to identify attacker actions. Event log analysis focuses on Event ID 4720 (account created), Event ID 4732 (user added to security-enabled group), and subsequent authentication events (Event ID 4624) showing account usage. Analysts should determine if account creation followed standard naming conventions and change management processes. If investigation confirms unauthorized activity, responses include immediately disabling the suspicious account, resetting passwords for potentially compromised accounts, reviewing and revoking unnecessary administrative privileges, scanning systems for malware or backdoors, and investigating how the attacker gained initial access. Organizations should implement just-in-time privileged access management requiring approval and time-limited elevation for administrative tasks, reducing attack surface for privilege escalation.
Option A is incorrect because assuming legitimacy without verification allows potential attackers to maintain privileged access, risking extensive damage. Option C is incorrect because delaying investigation until next business day gives attackers extended time to exploit privileged access for data theft or further compromise. Option D is incorrect because deleting all administrator accounts would disrupt legitimate administration and doesn’t address the underlying compromise that enabled unauthorized account creation.
Question 75:
An organization implements a Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) system. What is the PRIMARY benefit of SIEM for security operations?
A) Preventing all cyber attacks automatically
B) Aggregating and correlating logs from multiple sources to detect complex threats, provide centralized visibility, and enable rapid incident response
C) Replacing all other security tools
D) Eliminating the need for security analysts
Answer: B
Explanation:
Aggregating and correlating logs for threat detection, visibility, and incident response represents SIEM’s primary value because modern threats span multiple systems requiring holistic analysis. SIEM collects logs from diverse sources including firewalls, intrusion detection systems, endpoints, applications, and network devices, providing centralized repository for security data. Correlation rules identify patterns indicating security incidents by connecting related events across different systems that appear benign in isolation. For example, SIEM correlates failed login attempts across multiple systems with subsequent successful authentication from unusual location, identifying credential compromise. Real-time monitoring and alerting enables rapid detection and response to security incidents. SIEM dashboards provide security operations centers with unified visibility into organizational security posture. Advanced analytics including user behavior analytics, machine learning, and threat intelligence integration enhance detection capabilities. SIEM supports compliance requirements by collecting audit logs, generating compliance reports, and providing evidence for audits. Incident investigation capabilities include search functions across aggregated logs, timeline reconstruction, and correlation analysis showing attack progression. Integration with security orchestration and automated response (SOAR) platforms enables automated incident response workflows. Organizations should tune SIEM correlation rules to reduce false positives while ensuring genuine threats trigger alerts.
Option A is incorrect because SIEM is a detection and analysis platform, not a prevention system, and cannot automatically prevent all attacks. Option C is incorrect because SIEM complements other security tools rather than replacing them, aggregating their outputs for correlation. Option D is incorrect because SIEM requires skilled analysts to tune rules, investigate alerts, and respond to incidents; it enhances rather than eliminates analyst needs.
Question 76:
An analyst notices unusual PowerShell activity on a system including encoded commands and suspicious script executions. What should be the analyst’s concern?
A) PowerShell is always benign and requires no investigation
B) Attackers frequently use PowerShell for fileless malware, lateral movement, and evasion techniques; the encoded commands require investigation
C) PowerShell cannot be used maliciously
D) All PowerShell activity should be blocked without analysis
Answer: B
Explanation:
PowerShell’s malicious use is common because it provides powerful capabilities for system management that attackers exploit for fileless attacks, lateral movement, credential theft, and defense evasion. Malicious PowerShell indicators include base64 encoded commands obscuring malicious intent, downloading and executing scripts from external sources, invoking web requests to known malicious domains, disabling security features like Windows Defender, accessing sensitive system areas like SAM database for credential extraction, and using obfuscation techniques making analysis difficult. PowerShell supports fileless malware that operates entirely in memory, evading traditional antivirus detection. Attackers use PowerShell Empire, PowerSploit, and similar frameworks for post-exploitation activities. Detection requires monitoring PowerShell event logs (Event ID 4103 for module logging, 4104 for script block logging), analyzing command-line arguments for suspicious patterns, implementing application whitelisting restricting PowerShell execution, and using EDR solutions detecting malicious PowerShell behaviors. Organizations should enable enhanced PowerShell logging capturing script block contents, implement constrained language mode limiting PowerShell capabilities for non-administrative users, and monitor for suspicious patterns like encoded commands or execution bypassing execution policies. Legitimate administrative PowerShell use must be distinguished from malicious activity through baseline analysis and understanding normal administrative patterns.
Option A is incorrect because PowerShell is frequently weaponized and suspicious activity requires investigation. Option C is incorrect because PowerShell’s powerful capabilities are extensively exploited by attackers for various malicious purposes. Option D is incorrect because blocking all PowerShell disrupts legitimate administration; organizations should monitor and control rather than completely block PowerShell usage.
Question 77:
An analyst is investigating a potential data breach and needs to determine if sensitive customer data was accessed. Which log source would provide the most relevant information?
A) HVAC system logs
B) Database access logs and application logs showing query activity, accessed tables, and user accounts
C) Physical security badge swipe logs only
D) Cafeteria vending machine logs
Answer: B
Explanation:
Database access logs and application logs provide critical evidence of data access because they record queries executed, tables accessed, data returned, user accounts and source IPs, and timestamps of access events. These logs determine whether attackers accessed sensitive customer information, what specific data was viewed or extracted, which accounts were used for unauthorized access, and time periods when suspicious access occurred. Analysis examines unusual query patterns including queries returning large result sets suggesting bulk data extraction, access to sensitive tables from unexpected accounts or locations, execution of privileged commands like table dumps or backup operations, and queries occurring outside normal business hours. Database audit logs should capture successful and failed authentication attempts, privilege escalation activities, schema modifications, and data export operations. Application logs complement database logs by showing user actions, business logic execution, and API calls that triggered database queries. Correlation between database and application logs helps distinguish legitimate business operations from malicious data access. Organizations should implement database activity monitoring providing real-time alerts on suspicious queries, comprehensive audit logging capturing all database interactions, query analysis identifying abnormal patterns, and log retention meeting regulatory and investigative requirements. Regular log review and anomaly detection improve early breach detection before extensive exfiltration occurs.
Option A is incorrect because HVAC system logs are unrelated to data access and provide no information about database queries or application usage. Option C is incorrect because physical badge logs show building access but not what data was accessed electronically. Option D is incorrect because cafeteria logs have no relevance to digital data access investigation.
Question 78:
A security team wants to improve their ability to detect zero-day exploits and advanced malware. Which approach provides the best detection capability?
A) Relying solely on signature-based antivirus
B) Implementing behavioral analysis, sandboxing, threat intelligence, and anomaly detection to identify unknown threats
C) Disabling all security monitoring to reduce false positives
D) Only blocking known malicious IPs without additional detection
Answer: B
Explanation:
Behavioral analysis, sandboxing, threat intelligence, and anomaly detection provide defense against zero-day exploits and advanced malware because these threats evade signature-based detection by definition. Behavioral analysis monitors system and application behaviors identifying suspicious activities like unusual process relationships, abnormal network connections, unexpected file modifications, and privilege escalation attempts regardless of whether specific malware signatures are known. Sandboxing executes suspicious files in isolated environments observing behaviors including command-and-control communications, file encryption, credential theft, and persistence mechanism establishment. Automated sandbox analysis identifies zero-days through behavioral indicators even without prior threat knowledge. Threat intelligence provides context on attacker techniques, tactics, and procedures enabling detection of known APT behaviors with new tools. Anomaly detection establishes baselines of normal system and network behavior, alerting on statistically significant deviations that may indicate compromise. Machine learning models identify patterns associated with malicious activity across large datasets. Organizations should implement defense-in-depth combining multiple detection approaches since no single method catches all threats. Endpoint Detection and Response solutions integrate behavioral analysis, threat intelligence, and machine learning for comprehensive endpoint visibility. Network traffic analysis detects exploitation attempts and post-compromise activities. Regular threat hunting proactively searches for indicators of compromise that automated systems miss.
Option A is incorrect because signature-based detection by definition cannot identify zero-day exploits for which no signatures exist. Option C is incorrect because disabling monitoring eliminates all threat visibility rather than improving detection capabilities. Option D is incorrect because IP blocking alone misses zero-day exploits and advanced malware using rotating infrastructure and multiple attack vectors beyond known malicious IPs.
Question 79:
During incident response, an organization needs to communicate about the incident. What is the most important principle for incident communication?
A) Post detailed technical information about the breach on social media immediately
B) Follow established communication plans providing accurate, timely information to appropriate stakeholders while protecting investigation integrity and meeting legal obligations
C) Hide all information about incidents from everyone including incident response team
D) Speculate publicly about incident causes before investigation completes
Answer: B
Explanation:
Following communication plans with accurate, timely, appropriate stakeholder communication while protecting investigation and meeting legal obligations represents effective incident communication because breaches require coordinated communication with multiple audiences including executive leadership requiring strategic decision information, incident response team needing technical details, legal counsel advising on regulatory obligations, public relations managing external communications, affected customers deserving breach notifications, regulatory authorities requiring compliance reporting, and law enforcement if criminal activity occurred. Communication plans developed before incidents define authorities, approval processes, messaging templates, and notification timelines. Principles include accuracy in stating known facts without speculation about unconfirmed details, timeliness in notifying stakeholders within appropriate and required timeframes, transparency balanced with investigation needs and legal restrictions, and consistency ensuring all parties receive compatible information. Organizations must meet regulatory notification requirements including timelines for breach notifications under laws like GDPR or HIPAA, content requirements for notifications, and authorities requiring reporting. Communications should avoid technical details that could compromise.
Question 80:
What is the purpose of a threat intelligence platform (TIP) in security operations?
A) Aggregate threat intelligence from multiple sources, provide context and analysis, enable intelligence sharing, and integrate threat data with security tools
B) Generate threat intelligence without external sources
C) Replace security monitoring entirely
D) Only store historical threat data without analysis
Answer: A
Explanation:
Threat Intelligence Platforms centralize threat intelligence management, transforming raw threat data from diverse sources into actionable intelligence integrated with security operations. TIPs address challenges of intelligence overload, format inconsistency, and operational integration.
Intelligence aggregation collects threat data from multiple sources including commercial threat feeds, open-source intelligence, information sharing communities, and internal threat data from investigations. Aggregation provides comprehensive threat coverage combining different intelligence perspectives. Single-source intelligence misses threats covered by other sources. TIPs normalize different formats into consistent data structures enabling unified analysis.
Contextualization enriches raw indicators with context including threat actor attribution, campaign associations, attack techniques, targeted industries, and confidence ratings. Context transforms IP addresses or file hashes into meaningful intelligence explaining what threats they represent. Context helps prioritize response based on threat relevance to the organization.
Analysis capabilities include correlation identifying relationships between indicators, trend analysis showing emerging threats, risk scoring prioritizing threats by potential impact, and custom intelligence development creating organization-specific intel. Analysis transforms data into intelligence supporting decisions.
Intelligence sharing facilitates bidirectional information exchange with trusted partners, ISACs, and sharing communities. Organizations contribute intelligence from their investigations while receiving intelligence from others. Sharing multiplies detection capabilities as threats detected by one organization protect others. TIPs manage sharing relationships and automate bidirectional flows.
Integration with security tools operationalizes threat intelligence by pushing indicators to firewalls, IDS/IPS, SIEM, endpoint protection, and email gateways. Automated integration eliminates manual indicator deployment. Security tools automatically block or alert on threat indicators. Integration creates feedback loops where security tool detections generate new intelligence.
Use cases include indicator enrichment adding context to alerts, threat hunting using intelligence to guide proactive searches, incident response providing context for investigations, and security control tuning using intelligence to optimize detection rules. Intelligence informs multiple security processes.
Intelligence lifecycle management tracks indicator freshness, retires obsolete indicators, updates changed indicators, and maintains indicator provenance. Proper lifecycle management prevents false positives from outdated intelligence and ensures current threat coverage.
Workflow automation includes automatically enriching SIEM alerts with threat context, pushing new indicators to blocking systems, creating tickets for high-confidence threats, and generating intelligence reports. Automation accelerates intelligence operationalization.
Metrics demonstrate TIP value through number of threats detected via intelligence, time saved through automation, intelligence-driven blocks preventing damage, and improved analyst efficiency. Metrics justify TIP investments and guide program improvements.
Option B claiming TIPs generate intelligence without external sources misunderstands that intelligence generation requires data sources, though TIPs do create custom intelligence from internal data. Option C replacing monitoring entirely is incorrect as TIPs augment rather than replace monitoring. Option D limiting TIPs to storage without analysis misses their core value of transforming data into actionable intelligence.
