Microsoft MB-330 Dynamics 365 Supply Chain Management Exam Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set 7 121-140

Visit here for our full Microsoft MB-330 exam dumps and practice test questions.

Question 121:

A company using Dynamics 365 Supply Chain Management wants to automate replenishment for their batch-controlled products. When pick locations run low, the system must generate replenishment work only for items that meet specific batch criteria, such as expiration dates or batch attributes. Workers must move inventory from bulk locations while preserving full batch traceability. What should you configure?

A) Batch-enabled replenishment templates
B) Standard min-max replenishment
C) Unit sequence groups
D) Inventory adjustment journals

Answer:

A

Explanation:

Batch-enabled replenishment templates are the correct configuration because they allow the warehouse to perform replenishment while maintaining full batch integrity. Option A ensures that when forward pick locations require replenishment, the system selects the correct batch based on defined batch attributes, expiration dates, or other batch-related constraints. This is essential for industries such as pharmaceuticals, chemicals, food processing, and cosmetics, where regulatory requirements demand strict batch traceability.

Replenishment of batch-controlled items must not violate FIFO, FEFO, or attribute-based rules. Batch-enabled replenishment templates allow the system to incorporate batch reservation logic into replenishment decisions. This ensures that workers do not inadvertently replenish pick locations with incorrect batches, leading to compliance issues or inventory confusion. The system uses batch attributes to determine which batches are eligible for movement and creates movement work accordingly.

Option B, standard min-max replenishment, monitors pick-face inventory but does not enforce batch attribute rules. Standard replenishment might select any available batch in bulk storage, even if it does not meet the required attribute criteria. This could violate expiration rules or GMP guidelines.

Option C, unit sequence groups, control units of measure and picking sequences but have no influence on batch-specific replenishment.

Option D, inventory adjustment journals, can update batch inventory but do not provide automated or rule-based replenishment workflows.

Batch-enabled replenishment works with location directives. These directives use batch criteria such as expiration date, potency, or customer-specific batch restrictions. When the system determines that a pick location requires replenishment, it evaluates batch-controlled inventory in bulk locations according to these criteria. FEFO rules ensure that the batch with the earliest expiration date is replenished first. Attribute-based rules ensure that batches meeting customer or regulatory criteria are selected.

Thus, batch-enabled replenishment templates are the correct configuration because they ensure accurate replenishment of batch-controlled items, integrate with attribute-based rules, enforce traceability, and maintain compliance with industry standards.

Question 122:

A distribution center wants to improve outbound picking efficiency by assigning different picking strategies to different product groups. Heavy items must be picked first and placed at the bottom of pallets, while light items must be picked later to prevent damage. The system must generate picking work in the correct sequence automatically. What should you configure?

A) Work template pick sorting
B) Location profile strategies
C) Unit conversion rules
D) Wave labels

Answer:

A

Explanation:

Work template pick sorting is the correct configuration because it controls the order in which pick lines are executed, allowing the system to prioritize certain product groups such as heavy or bulky items. Option A ensures that heavy items are picked first and placed at the bottom of pallets, while lighter items are picked afterward. This prevents damage, improves picking workflow, and creates properly built pallets without requiring manual intervention.

Option B, location profile strategies, define storage attributes and constraints but do not control pick order.

Option C, unit conversion rules, manage units of measure but have no connection to picking sequence.

Option D, wave labels, control label printing but do not influence picking order.

Work template pick sorting integrates with wave processing. When the warehouse releases a wave, the system applies the sorting rules defined in the work templates to arrange pick lines in the desired sequence. For example, a wave containing heavy, medium, and light items will be sorted so that heavy items appear first in the work list. Workers follow the sequence automatically when using the mobile device.

This approach prevents improper pallet building, which can lead to safety issues or damaged goods. It also improves pick path efficiency by grouping similar items. When used alongside location directives, sort rules ensure workers follow the most efficient path that also builds pallets correctly.

Pick sorting is essential in warehouses that process diverse items such as appliances, beverages, heavy tools, paper goods, clothing, electronics, and fragile items. By controlling the sequence of picks, the warehouse ensures operational consistency across shifts and workers.

Thus, work template pick sorting is the correct configuration because it allows configuration of pick sequences based on product characteristics, supporting efficient and safe pallet building.

Question 123:

A company using Dynamics 365 Supply Chain Management needs to ensure that only fully licensed items can be consumed in production. Certain products require government approval before use, and consumption must be blocked until approval is granted. Approved items must be automatically unblocked. What should you configure?

A) Inventory statuses with status blocking rules
B) Quality order sampling
C) Production order BOM locking
D) Work template holds

Answer:

A

Explanation:

Inventory statuses with blocking rules are the correct configuration because they allow the system to prevent items from being used until specific approval conditions are met. Option A ensures that items requiring government certifications, testing results, or licensing validations cannot be consumed in production, transferred, or sold until an approved inventory status is applied.

Inventory statuses designate whether inventory is available or blocked for use. By applying a blocked status to items awaiting approval, the company ensures regulatory compliance and prevents accidental consumption. When approval is granted, the status can be changed to available automatically through processes such as quality order completion, inspection workflows, or system integration with external licensing systems.

Option B, quality order sampling, triggers inspections but does not prevent inventory use unless linked to inventory statuses.

Option C, production BOM locking, restricts changes to BOMs but has no impact on inventory availability or licensing.

Option D, work template holds, prevent creation of work but do not restrict production consumption.

Inventory statuses integrate seamlessly with advanced warehousing. When workers attempt to pick or consume an item with a blocked status, the system prevents the transaction and provides an error message. This ensures that controlled products cannot accidentally enter production or shipping workflows.

Statuses can also be assigned automatically during receiving. For example, when controlled items arrive from a supplier, they may be automatically assigned a blocked status until inspection or certification processes are completed. Quality associations can trigger automated tasks to ensure that appropriate inspections occur. Once approved, the status updates to available, allowing normal consumption.

Thus, inventory statuses with blocking rules are the correct configuration because they enforce regulatory compliance, prevent unauthorized use of controlled materials, and integrate with quality and production processes.

Question 124:

A warehouse needs to manage items stored across multiple temperature zones such as frozen, refrigerated, and ambient. Workers must follow specific pick paths depending on product temperature sensitivity, and the system must minimize travel between zones. Picking should begin in the warmest zone and end in the coldest to protect product quality. What should you configure?

A) Zone picking with temperature-based zoning
B) Work priority rules
C) Counting groups
D) License plate consolidation

Answer:

A

Explanation:

Zone picking with temperature-based zoning is the correct configuration because it allows the warehouse to structure picking paths based on distinct temperature areas. Option A ensures workers begin picking in ambient zones and progress through refrigerated and frozen areas last. This protects product quality by minimizing the time temperature-sensitive goods remain outside their controlled environments.

Option B, work priority rules, help determine which work is more urgent but do not define temperature-based paths.

Option C, counting groups, define cycle count criteria but have no impact on picking routes.

Option D, license plate consolidation, groups inventory but does not affect picking paths.

Zone picking allows the system to generate separate picking work for each temperature zone. When combined with wave processing, the system ensures that picking begins in the warmest zone. Workers pick items in ambient areas first, then refrigerated items, and finally frozen products. This ensures minimal time for cold items to remain outside their required environment before packing and shipment.

Temperature-based zoning is essential in grocery distribution, pharmaceutical warehouses, and chemical supply environments. It protects product integrity and ensures compliance with temperature regulations. Zone picking also improves overall efficiency because workers spend less time moving between distant or temperature-isolated areas.

Thus, zone picking with temperature-based zoning is the correct configuration because it controls picking paths, protects temperature-sensitive products, and improves operational flow.

Question 125:

A company needs to create a robust production costing process. They require the system to calculate the exact cost of finished goods based on actual material consumption, labor, overhead, and machine time. Costs must reflect true production performance and variances must be recorded automatically. What should you configure?

A) Actual cost calculation with production posting
B) Estimated cost BOM roll-up
C) Standard cost journals
D) Inventory value reports only

Answer:

A

Explanation:

Actual cost calculation with production posting is the correct configuration because it provides a detailed and accurate reflection of true production costs. Option A ensures that material usage, labor time, machine hours, overhead, and variances are all included in the final cost of finished goods. This is essential for companies that require precise costing, such as custom manufacturers, engineering-to-order companies, or industries with volatile material costs.

Option B, estimated cost BOM roll-up, calculates estimated costs but does not reflect actual consumption.

Option C, standard cost journals, maintain preset costs, not actuals.

Option D, inventory value reports, provide insights but do not calculate costs.

Actual costing integrates with production postings such as report-as-finished, route card journals, job card journals, and picking list consumption. As workers perform operations, costs accumulate automatically. When the production order is ended, all costs are settled and variances are posted. Material variance reflects the difference between estimated and actual consumption. Labor variance reflects differences in expected versus actual labor hours. Overhead variance captures differences in applied overhead versus expected overhead.

This level of costing detail supports financial accuracy and operational improvement. Management can analyze cost variances and identify inefficiencies such as excessive scrap, long machine setups, or overtime labor. It improves decision-making regarding pricing, product mix, and outsourcing.

Thus, actual cost calculation with production posting is the correct configuration because it provides complete cost accuracy, supports variance analysis, and ensures true production costs are reflected in financial statements.

Question 126:

A manufacturing company using Dynamics 365 Supply Chain Management needs to automate the creation of production order pick lists. They want the system to automatically reserve raw materials based on FEFO rules and generate picking work when the production order is released. The process must ensure that batch-controlled items follow expiration-based allocation, and workers must use mobile devices to pick and deliver materials to the production input location. What should you configure?

A) Wave-enabled production order picking
B) Manual picking list journals
C) Kanban replenishment rules
D) Production BOM locking

Answer:

A

Explanation:

Wave-enabled production order picking is the correct configuration because it integrates warehouse management processes with production order raw material picking. Option A ensures that production orders, when released, trigger warehouse wave processing that reserves materials based on FEFO rules, creates picking work, and directs workers through mobile device workflows. This is critical in environments where batch-controlled items must be picked in the correct order to ensure compliance and minimize expired material usage.

Option B, manual picking list journals, require users to generate picking documents manually. This method does not integrate with warehouse work creation or enforce FEFO-based picking. Manual journals also lack real-time mobile device guidance, making the process more prone to errors.

Option C, Kanban replenishment rules, are effective in lean manufacturing environments but do not support batch FEFO logic for production order picking. Kanban is designed for pull-based repetitive manufacturing, not structured production order–driven processes.

Option D, production BOM locking, prevents unauthorized changes to BOMs but does not automate picking or enforce FEFO.

Mobile device integration ensures that workers follow the correct picking sequence and validate the items they pick. This enhances accuracy, especially for batch-controlled goods. The mobile device forces workers to scan the correct batch, ensuring compliance with FEFO selection. This is important for industries such as food, pharmaceuticals, and chemicals.

Wave processing also supports multiple production orders in a batch. If several orders require the same material, the wave can consolidate picking work, improving efficiency and minimizing warehouse travel.

Thus, wave-enabled production picking is the correct configuration because it automates reservation, enforces FEFO, integrates with mobile device workflows, improves warehouse efficiency, and ensures production receives the correct materials at the correct time.

Question 127:

A company manufactures configurable products with multiple dimensions and size variations. Customers frequently change specifications after placing the order. The company needs a system process that recalculates material requirements and updates production components automatically when changes occur. The solution must support dynamic configuration during sales order creation. What should you configure?

A) Product configurator with configuration explosion
B) Standard BOM version control
C) Item variants with fixed BOM
D) Route blocking rules

Answer:

A

Explanation:

Product configurator with configuration explosion is the correct configuration because it supports dynamic product configuration, recalculates component requirements automatically, and allows flexible customization during sales order entry. Option A enables companies to build configurable BOMs that change depending on customer selections such as dimensions, colors, materials, or functional attributes.

In industries such as furniture, electronics, machinery, and custom manufacturing, customer specifications differ widely. A product configurator allows users to define attributes and rules that determine the BOM structure for each configuration. When a sales order is entered, the configurator asks for configuration selections. After the user selects attributes, the system generates a unique BOM and routing based on those selections. This is known as configuration explosion.

Option B, standard BOM version control, uses static BOMs and cannot dynamically change component requirements based on customer input.

Option C, item variants, is useful for simple variations such as color or size but cannot support complex configuration logic or recalculation of BOM components for highly customizable products.

Option D, route blocking rules, restrict production order status transitions but do not handle configurable BOMs.

Product configurator also integrates with costing. When BOMs are dynamically generated, costing calculations can determine the price based on material and labor associated with the specific configuration. This improves pricing accuracy and profitability analysis.

Thus, product configurator with configuration explosion is the correct solution because it supports dynamic customization, recalculates BOMs automatically, ensures configuration accuracy, and aligns material planning with customer-driven product variations.

Question 128:

A retail company wants to improve demand forecasting accuracy across multiple stores and distribution centers. They need forecasting that considers seasonality, historical sales, and lifecycle stages of products. The forecasting process must also support manual adjustments and integrate with master planning for replenishment. What should you configure?

A) Demand forecasting with Azure Machine Learning
B) Safety stock journals
C) Transfer order templates
D) Min-max replenishment without forecasting

Answer:

A

Explanation:

Demand forecasting with Azure Machine Learning is the correct configuration because it provides advanced statistical forecasting, supports seasonality modeling, considers product lifecycle stages, and allows integration with master planning. The forecasting model can analyze historical sales, detect trends, and generate accurate predictions for future demand across multiple sites.

Option B, safety stock journals, set inventory buffers but do not generate demand forecasts.

Option C, transfer order templates, automate transfers but rely on separate demand calculations.

Option D, min-max replenishment, triggers replenishment based on static thresholds without forecasting.

Demand forecasting integrates with forecast models and forecast plans in Dynamics 365. Forecasts can be generated by product, site, warehouse, or customer segment. The system provides a baseline forecast using machine learning, which planners can review and adjust. Manual adjustments accommodate business knowledge such as promotions, discontinuations, or special events.

Forecasts feed into master planning. The system uses the forecast to generate planned purchase, production, and transfer orders. This ensures the supply chain remains balanced and inventory levels match projected demand.

Azure Machine Learning also enables continuous improvement. As more historical data becomes available, the forecasting model recalibrates to increase accuracy. It can also account for new items by using lifecycle modeling, which analyzes similar products to estimate initial demand.

Thus, demand forecasting with Azure Machine Learning is the correct configuration because it enhances forecasting accuracy, supports seasonality, integrates with master planning, and provides the flexibility of manual adjustments.

Question 129:

A manufacturing company wants to automate material consumption in production orders. They want the system to automatically post material consumption based on the BOM quantity, even if workers do not register physical picking using mobile devices. The solution must also support backflushing at specific production operations. What should you configure?

A) Backflushing on BOM lines or route operations
B) Manual picking list journals
C) Production order holds
D) Counting journals

Answer:

A

Explanation:

Backflushing on BOM lines or route operations is the correct configuration because it allows the system to automatically post material consumption when production reaches specific stages. Option A supports automatic consumption posting without requiring manual or mobile device–based picking. Backflushing uses BOM quantities and operation triggers to determine material usage.

This is ideal for production environments where materials are consumed in a predictable manner. For example, assembly lines, repetitive manufacturing, and high-volume production environments often prefer backflushing to reduce administrative overhead. Workers do not need to pick items manually; instead, the system handles consumption automatically.

Option B, manual picking list journals, requires manual entry and do not automate consumption.

Option C, production order holds, control order flow but do not post consumption.

Option D, counting journals, relate to cycle counting and inventory accuracy, not production consumption.

Backflushing can be configured on BOM lines so that when production reaches certain route operations, the system automatically deducts materials. For example, if an operation consumes raw materials, the system posts consumption when that operation is reported as finished.

Backflushing supports precise costing because consumption is posted based on defined BOM quantities. If scrap or deviations occur, adjustments can be made manually. Backflushing also reduces workload for warehouse workers, improves production speed, and provides consistent material tracking.

Thus, backflushing on BOM lines or route operations is the correct configuration because it automates consumption, supports accurate costing, and simplifies production processes.

Question 130:

A company wants to implement a quality inspection process for purchased items. When materials are received, they must automatically move into a restricted status and undergo testing. Only after the quality inspection is passed should the inventory become available for use or sale. The process must block picking until approval. What should you configure?

A) Quality associations with inventory status blocking
B) Batch number groups
C) Production order quality orders
D) Cycle count thresholds

Answer:

A

Explanation:

Quality associations with inventory status blocking is the correct configuration because it allows the system to automatically trigger quality orders when items are received and ensures inventory remains restricted until inspection is complete. Option A enforces quality control at the receiving stage and prevents items from being used prematurely.

Quality associations define when a quality order should be created. When linked to purchase order receipt, the system automatically generates a quality order for inspection. Inventory status blocking ensures that items are placed into a status such as blocked or quarantine. Warehouse workers cannot pick, ship, or consume items until the quality order is passed.

Option B, batch number groups, control batch numbering but do not enforce inspection processes.

Option C, production order quality orders, apply inspections to production output, not purchased materials.

Option D, cycle count thresholds, relate to inventory accuracy, not quality control.

This configuration supports regulatory compliance, product safety, and customer satisfaction. It ensures purchased goods meet specifications before entering the supply chain. Once the inspection passes, the system updates the inventory status to available automatically, freeing the items for use.

Thus, quality associations with inventory status blocking is the correct solution because it enforces inspection, restricts inventory until approval, and supports accurate warehouse and procurement processes.

Question 131:

A company using Dynamics 365 Supply Chain Management wants to streamline its inbound receiving process for high-volume containers arriving from overseas suppliers. Each container contains mixed pallets of items that must be broken down at receiving. Workers must scan license plates, generate put-away work, and ensure items are routed to the correct storage locations based on item characteristics such as hazardous status, size, and temperature requirements. What should you configure?

A) Location directives with work templates for license plate receiving
B) Manual inventory journals for receiving
C) Transfer order receiving with no work
D) Arrival overview without warehouse management processes

Answer:

A

Explanation:

Location directives with work templates for license plate receiving is the correct configuration because this setup supports structured inbound processing for high-volume shipments. It ensures that when workers scan a license plate, the system automatically identifies the items, validates quantities, and creates put-away work. This is essential for complex inbound shipments where mixed pallets and containers must be broken down efficiently.

When an inbound container arrives, warehouse workers must quickly unload and identify its contents. License plate receiving allows a single scan to register multiple items associated with a pallet or container license plate. This increases speed, reduces manual input errors, and ensures all items are recognized instantly. After scanning, the system generates work based on predefined templates. These work templates define instructions such as picking from the receiving dock and putting items away into their designated storage areas.

Option B, manual inventory journals, does not create put-away work, does not support license plate scanning, and lacks automation. Manual journals would be far too slow and inaccurate for a high-volume inbound environment.

Option C, transfer order receiving with no work, only applies to internal warehouse movements and does not generate advanced warehouse pick-and-put instructions. It is not suitable for international container receiving.

Option D, arrival overview without warehouse management processes, provides basic receiving functionality but does not support automated work creation or routing based on item characteristics.

License plate receiving also improves traceability. Each license plate can represent a pallet, container, or mixed load, allowing the system to track inventory with high accuracy. This is critical for industries with strict reporting requirements such as pharmaceuticals, chemicals, and food distribution.

Thus, configuring location directives with work templates for license plate receiving ensures efficient inbound processing, accurate routing, high traceability, and full integration with warehouse operations.

Question 132:

A manufacturer needs to support subcontracting processes in Dynamics 365 Supply Chain Management. They frequently send partially completed goods to external vendors for additional processing before final assembly. The system must track material consumption, vendor labor costs, and the movement of WIP inventory between the company and subcontractors. What should you configure?

A) Subcontracting setup within route operations
B) Standard purchase orders only
C) Kanban rules for supplier replenishment
D) Service items with no BOM integration

Answer:

A

Explanation:

Subcontracting setup within route operations is the correct solution because it allows companies to incorporate external vendor work directly into the production routing structure. This ensures the system tracks WIP inventory transitioning between internal and external work centers, records vendor processing costs, and integrates subcontracted operations into overall production control.

Option B, standard purchase orders only, cannot track production progress and does not integrate WIP consumption or routing.

Option C, Kanban rules for supplier replenishment, apply to lean manufacturing and do not support WIP movement tied to a production order routing.

Option D, service items with no BOM integration, does not control material flow, WIP tracking, or production cost calculation.

Subcontracting within a route operation ensures accuracy in several ways. First, it ties external service work directly to the production order. Second, it allows the system to issue materials to subcontractors by generating picking lists. Third, it tracks materials sent to vendors, ensuring proper accounting and preventing losses. Fourth, it captures vendor service costs directly into the costing of the finished goods.

When the subcontractor completes their work, receiving the service purchase order triggers the system to update production progress. This ensures production order statuses accurately reflect the current routing step and allows subsequent internal operations to proceed. The system also updates WIP inventory, moving items from external WIP to internal WIP.

Costing is integrated as well. When the purchase order invoice is posted, vendor charges flow into the production order costing calculation. This ensures the final product reflects true labor, material, and overhead costs.

Thus, subcontracting within route operations is the correct solution because it fully integrates external processing into production control, costing, inventory tracking, and WIP management.

Question 133:

A distribution company wants to enforce carrier-specific loading rules during outbound processes. Some carriers require pallet-level scanning, while others require carton-level identification or weight verification. The system must ensure that workers follow the correct scanning steps depending on the selected carrier. What should you configure?

A) Packing profiles with carrier-specific validation rules
B) Wave step codes
C) Unit sequence groups
D) Location directives for outbound

Answer:

A

Explanation:

Packing profiles with carrier-specific validation rules is the correct configuration because it allows organizations to tailor packing and scanning requirements to each carrier’s logistical standards. Option A ensures that workers are required to scan cartons, pallets, or validate weights depending on which carrier is assigned to the shipment. This helps maintain compliance, prevents rejected shipments, and streamlines outbound processing.

Carriers often require strict labeling and scanning rules to ensure that shipments meet their operational and security standards. For example, some may require pallet-level license plate scanning, while others require item-level carton scanning or dimensional weight entry. Packing profiles support this by defining the workflow that applies during packing and confirming the load.

Option B, wave step codes, control the sequence of wave execution but do not enforce packing rules based on carrier.

Option C, unit sequence groups, affect units of measure relationships but not packing rules.

Option D, location directives, help determine pick and put locations but do not control outbound packing or carrier requirements.

Thus, packing profiles with carrier-specific validation rules is the correct configuration because it enforces scanning requirements, improves carrier compliance, and enhances outbound warehouse reliability.

Question 134:

A company needs to implement production scheduling across multiple shifts. They require the ability to assign operations to specific resources based on shift calendars, capacity limits, and efficiency factors. The system must visually show resource utilization and allow planners to adjust operations interactively. What should you configure?

A) Finite scheduling with resource calendars
B) Infinite capacity planning
C) Production BOM level control
D) Work policy groups

Answer:

A

Explanation:

Finite scheduling with resource calendars is the correct configuration because it allows planners to schedule production operations with respect to available capacity, resource-specific calendars, efficiency levels, and shift structures. Option A ensures that the system respects real-world constraints such as working hours, machine downtime, and shift patterns.

Finite scheduling evaluates resource calendars to determine when a resource is available. This includes standard working hours, breaks, overtime, and holidays. If a resource is not available, the system does not schedule operations for that time. It prevents over-allocation and supports realistic planning.

Option B, infinite capacity planning, schedules jobs without regard to actual capacity or constraints, making it unsuitable for real shift-based scheduling.

Option C, production BOM level control, manages BOM structure but not scheduling.

Option D, work policy groups, apply warehouse policies, not production scheduling.

Finite scheduling interacts with resource capacity models. Resources can be machines, labor groups, or tools. Each has its own capacity, efficiency percentage, and work calendar. Scheduling considers setup time, run time, and overlap possibilities. If an operation exceeds available capacity, the system adjusts the schedule accordingly.

The visual scheduling tool in Dynamics 365 provides planners with an interactive Gantt chart. They can drag and drop operations between resources or time slots and immediately see capacity changes. This helps planners resolve bottlenecks, balance workloads, and respond quickly to changes in demand or resource availability.

Thus, finite scheduling with resource calendars is the correct configuration because it supports accurate planning, capacity-aware scheduling, and visual resource management.

Question 135:

A company that distributes fragile electronics wants to enforce additional validation during picking and packing. Workers must confirm serial numbers, verify packaging quality, and ensure items are placed in protective cartons. The workflow must prevent users from completing the pick or pack if validations are incomplete. What should you configure?

A) Mobile device menus with mandatory confirmations
B) Work priority sorting
C) Counting journals
D) Location directives for fragile items

Answer:

A

Explanation:

Mobile device menus with mandatory confirmations is the correct configuration because it allows the warehouse to enforce additional validation steps during picking and packing. Option A ensures that workers must scan serial numbers, confirm packaging checks, or follow other required steps before they can complete work. These confirmations provide structured workflows essential for fragile electronics or other high-value inventory.

Serial number validation ensures that each item picked matches the exact serial expected for the sales order. This reduces shipping errors, improves traceability, and prevents accidental shipment of the wrong item. Mandatory confirmations can require scanning of serials, locations, or packaging IDs before allowing the user to proceed.

Option B, work priority sorting, affects pick order but not validation.
Option C, counting journals, apply to cycle counting, not picking.
Option D, location directives determine put locations but do not enforce validation steps.

Mandatory confirmations can include questions such as whether protective materials were added, whether the box was inspected, or whether shock sensors were attached. The mobile device prompts workers to confirm these steps. Until all required confirmations are completed, the system will not finalize the pick or pack work.

This setup improves quality control dramatically. It reduces product damage, improves customer satisfaction, and minimizes returns caused by inadequate packaging. It also ensures regulatory compliance in industries requiring strict tracking for serialized items.

Thus, mobile device menus with mandatory confirmations is the correct configuration because it enforces required validations, ensures quality handling for fragile goods, and integrates directly into warehouse workflows.

Question 136:

A manufacturing company needs to optimize material staging for multiple production lines. Each production line consumes materials at different rates, and the warehouse must ensure materials are replenished just in time without overstocking at the input locations. The system must generate automated replenishment work based on production demand, and workers must deliver materials to the correct line-side staging locations. What should you configure?

A) Production staging location directives with demand-based replenishment
B) Manual transfer journals for production staging
C) Vendor-managed inventory
D) Counting groups with cycle counting thresholds

Answer:

A

Explanation:

Production staging location directives with demand-based replenishment is the correct configuration because it allows the system to automate the flow of materials from bulk storage into production line-side staging areas based on actual production requirements. This ensures that materials arrive just in time, follow warehouse automation rules, and reduce the risk of overstocking or running out of materials at the production line.

In advanced manufacturing environments, materials are not stored directly at the production line because space is limited. Instead, materials are kept in bulk storage, and the warehouse delivers them to staging areas when needed. Production lines often operate at high speeds and cannot wait for manual material movement. Therefore, automated staging replenishment becomes essential for maintaining smooth operations and avoiding downtime.

Option A leverages both location directives and work templates to control how materials move from warehouse locations to the designated staging areas. Location directives define where to pick and where to put items based on criteria such as item number, production order, or location profile. Work templates define the tasks workers must perform, such as picking from bulk zones and delivering to staging locations.

Option B, manual transfer journals, lacks automation and requires manual decision-making by warehouse workers. This is inefficient and prone to errors, especially in high-volume or multi-shift production environments.

Option C, vendor-managed inventory, applies when suppliers manage stock levels within the warehouse but does not relate to production staging or internal warehouse replenishment.

Option D, counting groups with cycle counting thresholds, manage inventory accuracy but do not automate material delivery to staging areas.

Production staging replenishment also reduces line-side clutter. Overstocking near the production line reduces safety and operational efficiency. Demand-based replenishment solves these issues by ensuring that only required quantities are delivered.

For batch-controlled or serial-controlled products, the system ensures correct batch or serial selection when replenishing materials. This preserves traceability and compliance with industry regulations.

Thus, production staging location directives with demand-based replenishment is the correct configuration because it automates material movement, supports just-in-time supply, integrates with production demand, and ensures efficient material flow to the production line.

Question 137:

A company using Dynamics 365 Supply Chain Management wants to integrate their warehouse picking process with transportation planning. The system must assign picked sales orders to loads, suggest optimal grouping of shipments, and automatically release loads for wave processing. Transportation planners must be able to review load capacity, routing, and carrier assignments before shipments are executed. What should you configure?

A) Load planning workbench integrated with wave processing
B) Shipment reservation hierarchies
C) Manual packing slips
D) Transfer order wave automation

Answer:

A

Explanation:

The load planning workbench integrated with wave processing is the correct configuration because it aligns warehouse picking workflows with transportation planning. Option A enables planners to manage loads, optimize shipment grouping, evaluate capacity, assign carriers, and ensure warehouse work is executed efficiently through waves.

In many organizations, transportation and warehouse activities operate separately, leading to inefficiencies such as picking orders before trucks are assigned or reorganizing shipments after picking. The load planning workbench is designed to bridge this gap by providing a centralized interface where transportation planners can create, modify, or optimize loads before picking occurs.

Planners can group sales orders, transfer orders, and work orders into loads based on criteria such as route, carrier, destination, pallet configuration, weight, or volume. Once a load is ready, it can be released to wave processing, which creates picking and staging work. This ensures that only orders assigned to a load are picked, preventing wasted labor and reducing errors.

Option B, shipment reservation hierarchies, control how inventory reservations occur but do not support transportation optimization or load building.

Option C, manual packing slips, relate to invoicing processes and have no connection to load optimization or warehouse picking automation.

Option D, transfer order wave automation, applies to internal warehouse transfers rather than outbound shipping planning.

Thus, the load planning workbench integrated with wave processing is the correct configuration because it optimizes transportation planning, aligns warehouse execution with shipment needs, and enhances logistical efficiency across the supply chain.

Question 138:

A company operating a cold-storage warehouse needs strict control over handling perishable products. They must enforce FEFO picking during waves, ensure items past expiration cannot be picked, and route replenishment and picking work according to temperature zones. The solution must support batch tracking and ensure mobile workers confirm batch and expiration during execution. What should you configure?

A) Batch reservation with FEFO and cold-zone location directives
B) Standard FIFO reservation
C) Unit conversions
D) Static location assignments only

Answer:

A

Explanation:

Batch reservation with FEFO and cold-zone location directives is the correct configuration because perishable goods require strict management of batch attributes, expiration dates, and temperature-specific routing. Option A ensures FEFO-driven picking, accurate batch tracking, and proper warehouse zoning.

FEFO (First Expired, First Out) ensures that items with the earliest expiration dates are picked first. This is essential for cold storage facilities managing food products, pharmaceuticals, or chemicals. The system must not allow workers to pick items that are expired or close to expiration unless allowed by business policy.

Option B, standard FIFO reservation, only considers receipt dates, not expiration dates, making it unsuitable for perishable inventory.

Option C, unit conversions, handle measurement differences but not expiration or temperature handling.

Option D, static location assignments, cannot enforce FEFO or batch validation workflows.

Location directives define which cold zones apply to which products. Replenishment processes also follow these directives, ensuring that inventory moves between temperature zones correctly.

Thus, batch reservation with FEFO and cold-zone location directives is the correct configuration because it supports perishable goods management, batch compliance, and temperature-zone–driven workflows.

Question 139:

A global manufacturing organization needs to align production planning with multiple legal entities. Each entity has unique BOM versions, cost structures, and production routes. However, they share certain subassemblies and demand forecasts. The company needs a coordinated approach to master planning that supports intercompany orders, forecast sharing, and synchronized replenishment. What should you configure?

A) Intercompany master planning with consolidated forecast models
B) Transfer orders with no planning integration
C) Standard item coverage without intercompany rules
D) Independent master plans for each company with no links

Answer:

A

Explanation:

Intercompany master planning with consolidated forecast models is the correct configuration because it supports synchronized planning, shared forecasts, and automated intercompany transactions across multiple legal entities. This ensures that production, demand, and replenishment align across the supply chain.

Large global organizations often maintain separate legal entities due to regulatory or tax requirements. However, production processes frequently span multiple entities. One entity may produce subassemblies while another performs final assembly. Master planning must consider these dependencies.

Option A enables centralized forecast sharing across legal entities. A consolidated forecast model aggregates demand from multiple companies, allowing downstream entities to anticipate requirements and plan production accordingly. When a company needs materials produced by another entity, master planning generates intercompany planned purchase orders for the buying entity and corresponding planned sales orders in the supplying entity. These planned orders align automatically.

Option B, transfer orders with no planning integration, cannot synchronize planning across legal entities and does not support forecast sharing.

Option C, standard item coverage without intercompany rules, lacks multi-company coordination capabilities.

Option D, independent master plans with no links, forces planners to manually coordinate demand across entities, resulting in inefficiencies and mismatched supply.

Thus, intercompany master planning with consolidated forecast models is the correct configuration because it unifies planning, synchronizes production across companies, and improves supply chain visibility.

Question 140:

A company wants to automate replenishment for fast-moving pick-face locations. They use advanced warehouse management and require the system to monitor on-hand levels and trigger replenishment when inventory drops below predefined thresholds. Replenishment must prioritize full LP movements and ensure that workers follow scanning workflows. What should you configure?

A) Min-max replenishment templates with work creation
B) Replenishment using transfer journals
C) Wave demand replenishment only
D) Material reservations without work

Answer:

A

Explanation:

Min-max replenishment templates with work creation is the correct configuration because it provides automated replenishment based on minimum and maximum thresholds. When inventory falls below the minimum level, the system generates replenishment work directing workers to move full license plates from bulk storage to pick-face locations. Option A supports automated scanning, FEFO rules when needed, and efficient full-pallet replenishment.

Option B, transfer journals, require manual processing and do not automate replenishment.

Option C, wave demand replenishment, responds only to outbound wave demand and not general pick-face stocking needs.

Option D, material reservations without work, cannot move inventory physically or create warehouse tasks.

Min-max replenishment is ideal for fast-moving items because it keeps pick-face locations stocked efficiently. Workers receive mobile device tasks that guide picking from bulk locations and putting materials into pick locations. The system ensures inventory accuracy through scanning requirements.

Thus, min-max replenishment with work creation is the correct configuration because it automates warehouse stocking, supports LP movement, and improves operational efficiency.

 

Leave a Reply

How It Works

img
Step 1. Choose Exam
on ExamLabs
Download IT Exams Questions & Answers
img
Step 2. Open Exam with
Avanset Exam Simulator
Press here to download VCE Exam Simulator that simulates real exam environment
img
Step 3. Study
& Pass
IT Exams Anywhere, Anytime!