“result logs show the full planned active duration with no interruption” addresses the validation run did not maintain uninterrupted stress for the required duration, but the current hardware or infrastructure issue is short HPL runs did not test sustained power thermal and memory stability. The option “the full planned interval completes with valid residual and no reset” is more directly tied to the required outcome.

“clocks and FLOPS remain consistent after thermal equilibrium” addresses sustained matrix performance is limited by thermal throttling, but the current hardware or infrastructure issue is short HPL runs did not test sustained power thermal and memory stability. The option “the full planned interval completes with valid residual and no reset” is more directly tied to the required outcome.

“report contains compatible settings and reproduced performance within tolerance” addresses power-policy differences prevent reliable comparison of sustained performance, but the current hardware or infrastructure issue is short HPL runs did not test sustained power thermal and memory stability. The option “the full planned interval completes with valid residual and no reset” is more directly tied to the required outcome.

Useful for combined electrical headroom was not exercised under synchronized compute duty, but it does not remove the specific condition: numerical validity is a required condition throughout performance acceptance.

“investigate node cooling and log steady-state GPU clock and temperature” addresses sustained matrix performance is limited by thermal throttling, but the current hardware or infrastructure issue is numerical validity is a required condition throughout performance acceptance. The option “inspect accuracy checks and reject runs with invalid residual” is more directly tied to the required outcome.

“capture clock power and thermal settings alongside each burn-in record” addresses power-policy differences prevent reliable comparison of sustained performance, but the current hardware or infrastructure issue is numerical validity is a required condition throughout performance acceptance. The option “inspect accuracy checks and reject runs with invalid residual” is more directly tied to the required outcome.

“completed replacement or remediation yields error-free full-duration HPL” addresses latent memory faults are surfacing during repeated compute and memory stress, but the current hardware or infrastructure issue is numerical validity is a required condition throughout performance acceptance. The option “repeat extended HPL returns correct numerical solution at every required stage” is more directly tied to the required outcome.

“sustained multi-node HPL load stays below site power limits” addresses combined electrical headroom was not exercised under synchronized compute duty, but the current hardware or infrastructure issue is numerical validity is a required condition throughout performance acceptance. The option “repeat extended HPL returns correct numerical solution at every required stage” is more directly tied to the required outcome.

“clocks and FLOPS remain consistent after thermal equilibrium” addresses sustained matrix performance is limited by thermal throttling, but the current hardware or infrastructure issue is numerical validity is a required condition throughout performance acceptance. The option “repeat extended HPL returns correct numerical solution at every required stage” is more directly tied to the required outcome.

“perform extended qualified HPL burn-in under hardware monitoring” addresses short HPL runs did not test sustained power thermal and memory stability, but the current hardware or infrastructure issue is combined electrical headroom was not exercised under synchronized compute duty. The option “correlate full-cluster HPL burn-in with rack and feed measurements” is more directly tied to the required outcome.

Useful for the validation run did not maintain uninterrupted stress for the required duration, but it does not remove the specific condition: combined electrical headroom was not exercised under synchronized compute duty.

“compare HPL.dat versions driver runtime and NUMA affinity across cohorts” addresses node software or affinity settings produce inconsistent compute efficiency, but the current hardware or infrastructure issue is combined electrical headroom was not exercised under synchronized compute duty. The option “correlate full-cluster HPL burn-in with rack and feed measurements” is more directly tied to the required outcome.

“completed replacement or remediation yields error-free full-duration HPL” addresses latent memory faults are surfacing during repeated compute and memory stress, but the current hardware or infrastructure issue is combined electrical headroom was not exercised under synchronized compute duty. The option “sustained multi-node HPL load stays below site power limits” is more directly tied to the required outcome.

“repeat extended HPL returns correct numerical solution at every required stage” addresses numerical validity is a required condition throughout performance acceptance, but the current hardware or infrastructure issue is combined electrical headroom was not exercised under synchronized compute duty. The option “sustained multi-node HPL load stays below site power limits” is more directly tied to the required outcome.

“normalized per-node results converge within approved performance variance” addresses node software or affinity settings produce inconsistent compute efficiency, but the current hardware or infrastructure issue is combined electrical headroom was not exercised under synchronized compute duty. The option “sustained multi-node HPL load stays below site power limits” is more directly tied to the required outcome.

Useful for power-policy differences prevent reliable comparison of sustained performance, but it does not remove the specific condition: sustained matrix performance is limited by thermal throttling.

“inspect accuracy checks and reject runs with invalid residual” addresses numerical validity is a required condition throughout performance acceptance, but the current hardware or infrastructure issue is sustained matrix performance is limited by thermal throttling. The option “investigate node cooling and log steady-state GPU clock and temperature” is more directly tied to the required outcome.

“check GPU ECC events and isolate the suspected memory device” addresses latent memory faults are surfacing during repeated compute and memory stress, but the current hardware or infrastructure issue is sustained matrix performance is limited by thermal throttling. The option “investigate node cooling and log steady-state GPU clock and temperature” is more directly tied to the required outcome.

“report contains compatible settings and reproduced performance within tolerance” addresses power-policy differences prevent reliable comparison of sustained performance, but the current hardware or infrastructure issue is sustained matrix performance is limited by thermal throttling. The option “clocks and FLOPS remain consistent after thermal equilibrium” is more directly tied to the required outcome.

“the full planned interval completes with valid residual and no reset” addresses short HPL runs did not test sustained power thermal and memory stability, but the current hardware or infrastructure issue is sustained matrix performance is limited by thermal throttling. The option “clocks and FLOPS remain consistent after thermal equilibrium” is more directly tied to the required outcome.

“repeat extended HPL returns correct numerical solution at every required stage” addresses numerical validity is a required condition throughout performance acceptance, but the current hardware or infrastructure issue is sustained matrix performance is limited by thermal throttling. The option “clocks and FLOPS remain consistent after thermal equilibrium” is more directly tied to the required outcome.

“correlate full-cluster HPL burn-in with rack and feed measurements” addresses combined electrical headroom was not exercised under synchronized compute duty, but the current hardware or infrastructure issue is node software or affinity settings produce inconsistent compute efficiency. The option “compare HPL.dat versions driver runtime and NUMA affinity across cohorts” is more directly tied to the required outcome.

“check GPU ECC events and isolate the suspected memory device” addresses latent memory faults are surfacing during repeated compute and memory stress, but the current hardware or infrastructure issue is node software or affinity settings produce inconsistent compute efficiency. The option “compare HPL.dat versions driver runtime and NUMA affinity across cohorts” is more directly tied to the required outcome.

Useful for sustained matrix performance is limited by thermal throttling, but it does not remove the specific condition: node software or affinity settings produce inconsistent compute efficiency.

“report contains compatible settings and reproduced performance within tolerance” addresses power-policy differences prevent reliable comparison of sustained performance, but the current hardware or infrastructure issue is node software or affinity settings produce inconsistent compute efficiency. The option “normalized per-node results converge within approved performance variance” is more directly tied to the required outcome.

“sustained multi-node HPL load stays below site power limits” addresses combined electrical headroom was not exercised under synchronized compute duty, but the current hardware or infrastructure issue is node software or affinity settings produce inconsistent compute efficiency. The option “normalized per-node results converge within approved performance variance” is more directly tied to the required outcome.

“completed replacement or remediation yields error-free full-duration HPL” addresses latent memory faults are surfacing during repeated compute and memory stress, but the current hardware or infrastructure issue is node software or affinity settings produce inconsistent compute efficiency. The option “normalized per-node results converge within approved performance variance” is more directly tied to the required outcome.

Useful for short HPL runs did not test sustained power thermal and memory stability, but it does not remove the specific condition: the validation run did not maintain uninterrupted stress for the required duration.

“correlate full-cluster HPL burn-in with rack and feed measurements” addresses combined electrical headroom was not exercised under synchronized compute duty, but the current hardware or infrastructure issue is the validation run did not maintain uninterrupted stress for the required duration. The option “rerun the entire approved continuous HPL burn-in interval” is more directly tied to the required outcome.

“check GPU ECC events and isolate the suspected memory device” addresses latent memory faults are surfacing during repeated compute and memory stress, but the current hardware or infrastructure issue is the validation run did not maintain uninterrupted stress for the required duration. The option “rerun the entire approved continuous HPL burn-in interval” is more directly tied to the required outcome.

“the full planned interval completes with valid residual and no reset” addresses short HPL runs did not test sustained power thermal and memory stability, but the current hardware or infrastructure issue is the validation run did not maintain uninterrupted stress for the required duration. The option “result logs show the full planned active duration with no interruption” is more directly tied to the required outcome.

“repeat extended HPL returns correct numerical solution at every required stage” addresses numerical validity is a required condition throughout performance acceptance, but the current hardware or infrastructure issue is the validation run did not maintain uninterrupted stress for the required duration. The option “result logs show the full planned active duration with no interruption” is more directly tied to the required outcome.

“sustained multi-node HPL load stays below site power limits” addresses combined electrical headroom was not exercised under synchronized compute duty, but the current hardware or infrastructure issue is the validation run did not maintain uninterrupted stress for the required duration. The option “result logs show the full planned active duration with no interruption” is more directly tied to the required outcome.