Implementing Cisco Collaboration Core Technologies (CLCOR) 350-801 Practice Test 4
Question 30
For this Cisco collaboration incident — External mobile users need secure traversal into an on-premises collaboration service without a full VPN. — what test result most directly establishes that the corrective work succeeded?
- Only the configured carrier peer can establish expected SIP sessions into the controlled border.
- A PSTN call traverses the expected CUBE policy with the intended signaling and media addresses.
- Clock offsets fall within policy and previously rejected time-sensitive assertions validate.
- An authorized external client completes signaling and media traversal while internal-only services remain unexposed.
Explanation
Correct Answer
D:Expressway traversal roles connect trusted internal collaboration to controlled external access boundaries. This is decisive because the expected outcome is: An authorized external client completes signaling and media traversal while internal-only services remain unexposed.
Incorrect Answers
A:“Only the configured carrier peer can establish expected SIP sessions into the controlled border” evaluates an SBC isolates trust zones and enforces signaling policy at the carrier-to-enterprise boundary. It would not confirm the collaboration outcome requiring expressway traversal roles connect trusted internal collaboration to controlled external access boundaries.
B:“A PSTN call traverses the expected CUBE policy with the intended signaling and media addresses” evaluates cUBE acts as a session border controller, unlike an Expressway pair used for collaboration traversal. It would not confirm the collaboration outcome requiring expressway traversal roles connect trusted internal collaboration to controlled external access boundaries.
C:“Clock offsets fall within policy and previously rejected time-sensitive assertions validate” evaluates clock skew can invalidate certificate- and assertion-based authentication even when hostnames match. It would not confirm the collaboration outcome requiring expressway traversal roles connect trusted internal collaboration to controlled external access boundaries.
Question 31
During a collaboration systems review, the following is documented: An enterprise SIP trunk needs topology hiding, interworking and policy enforcement at the PSTN handoff. Which response should engineers prioritize?
- Place Cisco Expressway-C and Expressway-E roles appropriately for supported mobile and remote access traversal.
- Design a hybrid calling architecture with centralized policy and region-specific PSTN connectivity.
- Define an end-to-end QoS policy classifying signaling and real-time media and preserving markings through bottlenecks.
- Deploy Cisco Unified Border Element at the supported SIP-to-SIP session border.
Explanation
Correct Answer
D:CUBE acts as a session border controller, unlike an Expressway pair used for collaboration traversal. Apply the specific remedy: Deploy Cisco Unified Border Element at the supported SIP-to-SIP session border. Verify it by checking: A PSTN call traverses the expected CUBE policy with the intended signaling and media addresses.
Incorrect Answers
A:“Place Cisco Expressway-C and Expressway-E roles appropriately for supported mobile and remote access traversal” concerns expressway traversal roles connect trusted internal collaboration to controlled external access boundaries. The stated collaboration requirement instead depends on cUBE acts as a session border controller, unlike an Expressway pair used for collaboration traversal.
B:“Design a hybrid calling architecture with centralized policy and region-specific PSTN connectivity” concerns hybrid design separates centrally governed collaboration services from location-specific carrier and regulatory requirements. The stated collaboration requirement instead depends on cUBE acts as a session border controller, unlike an Expressway pair used for collaboration traversal.
C:“Define an end-to-end QoS policy classifying signaling and real-time media and preserving markings through bottlenecks” concerns qoS protects latency-sensitive packets only when classification, marking and forwarding policy agree end to end. The stated collaboration requirement instead depends on cUBE acts as a session border controller, unlike an Expressway pair used for collaboration traversal.
Question 32
A Cisco collaboration operations team is closing a ticket for this requirement: An enterprise SIP trunk needs topology hiding, interworking and policy enforcement at the PSTN handoff. Which result provides the strongest verification?
- An authorized external client completes signaling and media traversal while internal-only services remain unexposed.
- A PSTN call traverses the expected CUBE policy with the intended signaling and media addresses.
- The endpoint accepts the updated server certificate and completes the secure TLS session.
- Congestion tests show bounded voice delay and loss while lower-priority traffic yields bandwidth.
Explanation
Correct Answer
B:CUBE acts as a session border controller, unlike an Expressway pair used for collaboration traversal. This is decisive because the expected outcome is: A PSTN call traverses the expected CUBE policy with the intended signaling and media addresses.
Incorrect Answers
A:“An authorized external client completes signaling and media traversal while internal-only services remain unexposed” evaluates expressway traversal roles connect trusted internal collaboration to controlled external access boundaries. It would not confirm the collaboration outcome requiring cUBE acts as a session border controller, unlike an Expressway pair used for collaboration traversal.
C:“The endpoint accepts the updated server certificate and completes the secure TLS session” evaluates TLS verifies peer identity independently of TCP reachability. It would not confirm the collaboration outcome requiring cUBE acts as a session border controller, unlike an Expressway pair used for collaboration traversal.
D:“Congestion tests show bounded voice delay and loss while lower-priority traffic yields bandwidth” evaluates qoS protects latency-sensitive packets only when classification, marking and forwarding policy agree end to end. It would not confirm the collaboration outcome requiring cUBE acts as a session border controller, unlike an Expressway pair used for collaboration traversal.
Question 33
During a collaboration systems review, the following is documented: A design places a SIP carrier directly on the internal call-control subnet with no border policy. Which response should engineers prioritize?
- Establish a controlled SBC demarcation with approved SIP peers, ingress restrictions and routing policy.
- Place Cisco Expressway-C and Expressway-E roles appropriately for supported mobile and remote access traversal.
- Inspect SAML trust metadata, signing certificate and time alignment in the Cisco collaboration SSO integration.
- Verify voice VLAN connectivity and DHCP scope or relay, including required options for the deployment.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:An SBC isolates trust zones and enforces signaling policy at the carrier-to-enterprise boundary. Apply the specific remedy: Establish a controlled SBC demarcation with approved SIP peers, ingress restrictions and routing policy. Verify it by checking: Only the configured carrier peer can establish expected SIP sessions into the controlled border.
Incorrect Answers
B:“Place Cisco Expressway-C and Expressway-E roles appropriately for supported mobile and remote access traversal” concerns expressway traversal roles connect trusted internal collaboration to controlled external access boundaries. The stated collaboration requirement instead depends on an SBC isolates trust zones and enforces signaling policy at the carrier-to-enterprise boundary.
C:“Inspect SAML trust metadata, signing certificate and time alignment in the Cisco collaboration SSO integration” concerns a trust-relationship change can break SAML signatures without affecting local accounts. The stated collaboration requirement instead depends on an SBC isolates trust zones and enforces signaling policy at the carrier-to-enterprise boundary.
D:“Verify voice VLAN connectivity and DHCP scope or relay, including required options for the deployment” concerns a phone cannot begin normal service discovery without working network-layer configuration. The stated collaboration requirement instead depends on an SBC isolates trust zones and enforces signaling policy at the carrier-to-enterprise boundary.
Question 34
A Cisco collaboration operations team is closing a ticket for this requirement: A design places a SIP carrier directly on the internal call-control subnet with no border policy. Which result provides the strongest verification?
- Only the configured carrier peer can establish expected SIP sessions into the controlled border.
- An authorized external client completes signaling and media traversal while internal-only services remain unexposed.
- Replication returns to the supported healthy state and test registrations still work before advancing.
- A recovery drill restores a test deployment with preserved configurations and operational registration.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:An SBC isolates trust zones and enforces signaling policy at the carrier-to-enterprise boundary. This is decisive because the expected outcome is: Only the configured carrier peer can establish expected SIP sessions into the controlled border.
Incorrect Answers
B:“An authorized external client completes signaling and media traversal while internal-only services remain unexposed” evaluates expressway traversal roles connect trusted internal collaboration to controlled external access boundaries. It would not confirm the collaboration outcome requiring an SBC isolates trust zones and enforces signaling policy at the carrier-to-enterprise boundary.
C:“Replication returns to the supported healthy state and test registrations still work before advancing” evaluates continuing an upgrade with unhealthy cluster replication risks propagating inconsistent configuration. It would not confirm the collaboration outcome requiring an SBC isolates trust zones and enforces signaling policy at the carrier-to-enterprise boundary.
D:“A recovery drill restores a test deployment with preserved configurations and operational registration” evaluates an upgrade rollback is credible only when backed by supported recovery procedures and usable saved state. It would not confirm the collaboration outcome requiring an SBC isolates trust zones and enforces signaling policy at the carrier-to-enterprise boundary.
Question 35
During a collaboration systems review, the following is documented: An upgrade proposal changes all Cisco UCM nodes simultaneously before validating compatibility and backup recovery. Which response should engineers prioritize?
- Stop further upgrades and verify node services and database replication health before the next stage.
- Validate a supported recovery and rollback path, recent DRS backup and version compatibility before proceeding.
- Confirm target-version compatibility, run pre-upgrade checks, back up the cluster and sequence the supported node upgrades.
- Size conferencing and call-processing capacity from peak simultaneous sessions, traffic profiles and resilience headroom.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:Cluster upgrades must protect database and service continuity as well as software package installation. Apply the specific remedy: Confirm target-version compatibility, run pre-upgrade checks, back up the cluster and sequence the supported node upgrades. Verify it by checking: After the planned sequence, database replication and endpoint registration are healthy on the target release.
Incorrect Answers
A:“Stop further upgrades and verify node services and database replication health before the next stage” concerns continuing an upgrade with unhealthy cluster replication risks propagating inconsistent configuration. The stated collaboration requirement instead depends on cluster upgrades must protect database and service continuity as well as software package installation.
B:“Validate a supported recovery and rollback path, recent DRS backup and version compatibility before proceeding” concerns an upgrade rollback is credible only when backed by supported recovery procedures and usable saved state. The stated collaboration requirement instead depends on cluster upgrades must protect database and service continuity as well as software package installation.
D:“Size conferencing and call-processing capacity from peak simultaneous sessions, traffic profiles and resilience headroom” concerns busy-hour concurrency and endpoint media profiles determine resource pressure more directly than licensed user totals alone. The stated collaboration requirement instead depends on cluster upgrades must protect database and service continuity as well as software package installation.
Question 36
An assessor is validating a change intended to fix: An upgrade proposal changes all Cisco UCM nodes simultaneously before validating compatibility and backup recovery. Which observed result is most decisive?
- Replication returns to the supported healthy state and test registrations still work before advancing.
- A recovery drill restores a test deployment with preserved configurations and operational registration.
- A fresh identity assertion validates against the new certificate and the user signs in through SSO.
- After the planned sequence, database replication and endpoint registration are healthy on the target release.
Explanation
Correct Answer
D:Cluster upgrades must protect database and service continuity as well as software package installation. This is decisive because the expected outcome is: After the planned sequence, database replication and endpoint registration are healthy on the target release.
Incorrect Answers
A:“Replication returns to the supported healthy state and test registrations still work before advancing” evaluates continuing an upgrade with unhealthy cluster replication risks propagating inconsistent configuration. It would not confirm the collaboration outcome requiring cluster upgrades must protect database and service continuity as well as software package installation.
B:“A recovery drill restores a test deployment with preserved configurations and operational registration” evaluates an upgrade rollback is credible only when backed by supported recovery procedures and usable saved state. It would not confirm the collaboration outcome requiring cluster upgrades must protect database and service continuity as well as software package installation.
C:“A fresh identity assertion validates against the new certificate and the user signs in through SSO” evaluates a trust-relationship change can break SAML signatures without affecting local accounts. It would not confirm the collaboration outcome requiring cluster upgrades must protect database and service continuity as well as software package installation.
Question 37
During a migration-readiness audit, the assessor records: A Cisco UCM upgrade failed and a team considers using an untested rollback image with no configuration backup. Which implementation meets the constraint?
- Stop further upgrades and verify node services and database replication health before the next stage.
- Confirm target-version compatibility, run pre-upgrade checks, back up the cluster and sequence the supported node upgrades.
- Inspect SAML trust metadata, signing certificate and time alignment in the Cisco collaboration SSO integration.
- Validate a supported recovery and rollback path, recent DRS backup and version compatibility before proceeding.
Explanation
Correct Answer
D:An upgrade rollback is credible only when backed by supported recovery procedures and usable saved state. Apply the specific remedy: Validate a supported recovery and rollback path, recent DRS backup and version compatibility before proceeding. Verify it by checking: A recovery drill restores a test deployment with preserved configurations and operational registration.
Incorrect Answers
A:“Stop further upgrades and verify node services and database replication health before the next stage” evaluates continuing an upgrade with unhealthy cluster replication risks propagating inconsistent configuration. It would not confirm the collaboration outcome requiring an upgrade rollback is credible only when backed by supported recovery procedures and usable saved state.
B:“Confirm target-version compatibility, run pre-upgrade checks, back up the cluster and sequence the supported node upgrades” evaluates cluster upgrades must protect database and service continuity as well as software package installation. It would not confirm the collaboration outcome requiring an upgrade rollback is credible only when backed by supported recovery procedures and usable saved state.
C:“Inspect SAML trust metadata, signing certificate and time alignment in the Cisco collaboration SSO integration” evaluates a trust-relationship change can break SAML signatures without affecting local accounts. It would not confirm the collaboration outcome requiring an upgrade rollback is credible only when backed by supported recovery procedures and usable saved state.
Question 38
An assessor is validating a change intended to fix: A Cisco UCM upgrade failed and a team considers using an untested rollback image with no configuration backup. Which observed result is most decisive?
- Replication returns to the supported healthy state and test registrations still work before advancing.
- After the planned sequence, database replication and endpoint registration are healthy on the target release.
- A controlled eligible user appears once in the synchronized Cisco UCM directory.
- A recovery drill restores a test deployment with preserved configurations and operational registration.
Explanation
Correct Answer
D:An upgrade rollback is credible only when backed by supported recovery procedures and usable saved state. This is decisive because the expected outcome is: A recovery drill restores a test deployment with preserved configurations and operational registration.
Incorrect Answers
A:“Replication returns to the supported healthy state and test registrations still work before advancing” evaluates continuing an upgrade with unhealthy cluster replication risks propagating inconsistent configuration. It would not confirm the collaboration outcome requiring an upgrade rollback is credible only when backed by supported recovery procedures and usable saved state.
B:“After the planned sequence, database replication and endpoint registration are healthy on the target release” evaluates cluster upgrades must protect database and service continuity as well as software package installation. It would not confirm the collaboration outcome requiring an upgrade rollback is credible only when backed by supported recovery procedures and usable saved state.
C:“A controlled eligible user appears once in the synchronized Cisco UCM directory” evaluates lDAP lookup scope and synchronization filters determine which external identities are imported. It would not confirm the collaboration outcome requiring an upgrade rollback is credible only when backed by supported recovery procedures and usable saved state.
Question 39
During a migration-readiness audit, the assessor records: After upgrading a secondary Cisco UCM node, the cluster reports stale database replication. Which implementation meets the constraint?
- Stop further upgrades and verify node services and database replication health before the next stage.
- Validate a supported recovery and rollback path, recent DRS backup and version compatibility before proceeding.
- Confirm target-version compatibility, run pre-upgrade checks, back up the cluster and sequence the supported node upgrades.
- Design a hybrid calling architecture with centralized policy and region-specific PSTN connectivity.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:Continuing an upgrade with unhealthy cluster replication risks propagating inconsistent configuration. Apply the specific remedy: Stop further upgrades and verify node services and database replication health before the next stage. Verify it by checking: Replication returns to the supported healthy state and test registrations still work before advancing.
Incorrect Answers
B:“Validate a supported recovery and rollback path, recent DRS backup and version compatibility before proceeding” concerns an upgrade rollback is credible only when backed by supported recovery procedures and usable saved state. The stated collaboration requirement instead depends on continuing an upgrade with unhealthy cluster replication risks propagating inconsistent configuration.
C:“Confirm target-version compatibility, run pre-upgrade checks, back up the cluster and sequence the supported node upgrades” concerns cluster upgrades must protect database and service continuity as well as software package installation. The stated collaboration requirement instead depends on continuing an upgrade with unhealthy cluster replication risks propagating inconsistent configuration.
D:“Design a hybrid calling architecture with centralized policy and region-specific PSTN connectivity” concerns hybrid design separates centrally governed collaboration services from location-specific carrier and regulatory requirements. The stated collaboration requirement instead depends on continuing an upgrade with unhealthy cluster replication risks propagating inconsistent configuration.
Question 40
An assessor is validating a change intended to fix: After upgrading a secondary Cisco UCM node, the cluster reports stale database replication. Which observed result is most decisive?
- A recovery drill restores a test deployment with preserved configurations and operational registration.
- After the planned sequence, database replication and endpoint registration are healthy on the target release.
- Replication returns to the supported healthy state and test registrations still work before advancing.
- A handset learns the expected voice VLAN and registers from the correct subnet.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:Continuing an upgrade with unhealthy cluster replication risks propagating inconsistent configuration. This is decisive because the expected outcome is: Replication returns to the supported healthy state and test registrations still work before advancing.
Incorrect Answers
A:“A recovery drill restores a test deployment with preserved configurations and operational registration” evaluates an upgrade rollback is credible only when backed by supported recovery procedures and usable saved state. It would not confirm the collaboration outcome requiring continuing an upgrade with unhealthy cluster replication risks propagating inconsistent configuration.
B:“After the planned sequence, database replication and endpoint registration are healthy on the target release” evaluates cluster upgrades must protect database and service continuity as well as software package installation. It would not confirm the collaboration outcome requiring continuing an upgrade with unhealthy cluster replication risks propagating inconsistent configuration.
D:“A handset learns the expected voice VLAN and registers from the correct subnet” evaluates link-layer neighbor signaling can inform endpoint voice VLAN selection, but switch access policy still controls forwarding. It would not confirm the collaboration outcome requiring continuing an upgrade with unhealthy cluster replication risks propagating inconsistent configuration.