Pass Cisco CLCOR 350-801 Exam in First Attempt Easily

Latest Cisco CLCOR 350-801 Practice Test Questions, CLCOR Exam Dumps
Accurate & Verified Answers As Experienced in the Actual Test!

You save
$39.99
Save
Verified by experts
350-801 Premium Bundle
Exam Code: 350-801
Exam Name: Implementing Cisco Collaboration Core Technologies (CLCOR)
Certification Provider: Cisco
Bundle includes 3 products: Premium File, Training Course, Study Guide
accept downloads in the last 7 days
350-801 Premium Bundle
  • Premium File 421 Questions & Answers
    Last Update: Nov 6, 2026
  • Training Course 38 Lectures
  • Study Guide 1435 Pages

Implementing Cisco Collaboration Core Technologies (CLCOR) 350-801 Practice Test 23

Question 220

An assessor is validating a change intended to fix: Cisco UCM shows duplicated employee identities after a directory integration was reconfigured. Which observed result is most decisive?

  1. After a test sync each eligible directory identity has a single consistent UCM mapping.
  2. The user can edit allowed phones but cannot modify high-privilege routing or trunk objects.
  3. The disabled administrator cannot authenticate or exercise old local administrative privileges.
  4. Premium-rate test dialing fails from a guest phone while emergency and approved local calls still pass.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Stable identity keys prevent duplicate records and orphaned resource association during directory changes. This is decisive because the expected outcome is: After a test sync each eligible directory identity has a single consistent UCM mapping.

Incorrect Answers

B:

“The user can edit allowed phones but cannot modify high-privilege routing or trunk objects” evaluates role-based access control prevents overbroad privileges in operational accounts. It would not confirm the collaboration outcome requiring stable identity keys prevent duplicate records and orphaned resource association during directory changes.

C:

“The disabled administrator cannot authenticate or exercise old local administrative privileges” evaluates removing external authentication alone may leave stale application-side authorization assignments. It would not confirm the collaboration outcome requiring stable identity keys prevent duplicate records and orphaned resource association during directory changes.

D:

“Premium-rate test dialing fails from a guest phone while emergency and approved local calls still pass” evaluates least-privilege call routing prevents unauthorized destinations from being selected by restricted devices. It would not confirm the collaboration outcome requiring stable identity keys prevent duplicate records and orphaned resource association during directory changes.

Question 221

For this Cisco collaboration support case: A SIP trunk reaches an IVR but digit presses fail because the border sends incompatible RTP telephone-event payloads. Which change most directly addresses the requirement?

  1. Configure compatible RFC 2833/4733 DTMF relay and payload negotiation on both CUBE call legs.
  2. Inspect destination-pattern eligibility, dial-peer matching priority and the intended outbound peer configuration.
  3. Enable a supported SIP OPTIONS keepalive policy and use peer availability for routing eligibility.
  4. Use an authorized SIP profile adjustment for the specific interop header requirement on the matching peer.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

DTMF relay must match the peer's negotiated event method and payload interpretation. Apply the specific remedy: Configure compatible RFC 2833/4733 DTMF relay and payload negotiation on both CUBE call legs. Verify it by checking: A gateway capture shows supported telephone-event packets and the IVR recognizes every test digit.

Incorrect Answers

B:

“Inspect destination-pattern eligibility, dial-peer matching priority and the intended outbound peer configuration” concerns iOS XE matches dial peers according to configured call-leg selection rules rather than interface order alone. The stated collaboration requirement instead depends on dTMF relay must match the peer's negotiated event method and payload interpretation.

C:

“Enable a supported SIP OPTIONS keepalive policy and use peer availability for routing eligibility” concerns oPTIONS reachability monitors signaling peer responsiveness before placing new calls. The stated collaboration requirement instead depends on dTMF relay must match the peer's negotiated event method and payload interpretation.

D:

“Use an authorized SIP profile adjustment for the specific interop header requirement on the matching peer” concerns sIP profiles can manipulate defined signaling headers without rewriting the whole dial plan. The stated collaboration requirement instead depends on dTMF relay must match the peer's negotiated event method and payload interpretation.

Question 222

After an engineering change, a reviewer must determine whether this specific Cisco collaboration fault is corrected: A SIP trunk reaches an IVR but digit presses fail because the border sends incompatible RTP telephone-event payloads. Which observation is the best acceptance evidence?

  1. A voice dial-peer trace shows the selected peer matches the intended called number.
  2. Repeated failed OPTIONS probes mark the peer unavailable and calls select the healthy target.
  3. Carrier captures show requests and responses from the approved border address.
  4. A gateway capture shows supported telephone-event packets and the IVR recognizes every test digit.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

DTMF relay must match the peer's negotiated event method and payload interpretation. This is decisive because the expected outcome is: A gateway capture shows supported telephone-event packets and the IVR recognizes every test digit.

Incorrect Answers

A:

“A voice dial-peer trace shows the selected peer matches the intended called number” evaluates iOS XE matches dial peers according to configured call-leg selection rules rather than interface order alone. It would not confirm the collaboration outcome requiring dTMF relay must match the peer's negotiated event method and payload interpretation.

B:

“Repeated failed OPTIONS probes mark the peer unavailable and calls select the healthy target” evaluates oPTIONS reachability monitors signaling peer responsiveness before placing new calls. It would not confirm the collaboration outcome requiring dTMF relay must match the peer's negotiated event method and payload interpretation.

C:

“Carrier captures show requests and responses from the approved border address” evaluates sIP bind settings govern transport-source behavior independently of the called number. It would not confirm the collaboration outcome requiring dTMF relay must match the peer's negotiated event method and payload interpretation.

Question 223

For this Cisco collaboration support case: A carrier sends international called numbers but the internal destination expects a national prefix. Which change most directly addresses the requirement?

  1. Use the supported DNS SRV lookup and resolver policy for the provider SIP destination.
  2. Apply an appropriate IOS XE voice translation rule and profile on the relevant dial peer.
  3. Separate the call legs into appropriately bound SIP dial peers or tenant policies and validate each route.
  4. Trace the full IOS XE inbound/outbound dial-peer decision and transformed destination digits.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Voice translation profiles rewrite call-party numbers at the configured gateway boundary. Apply the specific remedy: Apply an appropriate IOS XE voice translation rule and profile on the relevant dial peer. Verify it by checking: SIP signaling after the matching peer contains the intended transformed called number.

Incorrect Answers

A:

“Use the supported DNS SRV lookup and resolver policy for the provider SIP destination” concerns DNS SRV can supply SIP service target and priority information without embedding one static server address. The stated collaboration requirement instead depends on voice translation profiles rewrite call-party numbers at the configured gateway boundary.

C:

“Separate the call legs into appropriately bound SIP dial peers or tenant policies and validate each route” concerns session-border policy must reflect each provider's signaling expectations and trust boundary. The stated collaboration requirement instead depends on voice translation profiles rewrite call-party numbers at the configured gateway boundary.

D:

“Trace the full IOS XE inbound/outbound dial-peer decision and transformed destination digits” concerns a 404 may follow number or peer selection failure; a general codec adjustment would not fix missing routing. The stated collaboration requirement instead depends on voice translation profiles rewrite call-party numbers at the configured gateway boundary.

Question 224

After an engineering change, a reviewer must determine whether this specific Cisco collaboration fault is corrected: A carrier sends international called numbers but the internal destination expects a national prefix. Which observation is the best acceptance evidence?

  1. A controlled DNS target change is reflected in subsequent authorized SIP routing.
  2. A test on each leg uses its correct signaling bind, peer identity and policy settings.
  3. SIP signaling after the matching peer contains the intended transformed called number.
  4. The previously incompatible flow succeeds with the justified MTP assignment without allocating it to every call.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Voice translation profiles rewrite call-party numbers at the configured gateway boundary. This is decisive because the expected outcome is: SIP signaling after the matching peer contains the intended transformed called number.

Incorrect Answers

A:

“A controlled DNS target change is reflected in subsequent authorized SIP routing” evaluates DNS SRV can supply SIP service target and priority information without embedding one static server address. It would not confirm the collaboration outcome requiring voice translation profiles rewrite call-party numbers at the configured gateway boundary.

B:

“A test on each leg uses its correct signaling bind, peer identity and policy settings” evaluates session-border policy must reflect each provider's signaling expectations and trust boundary. It would not confirm the collaboration outcome requiring voice translation profiles rewrite call-party numbers at the configured gateway boundary.

D:

“The previously incompatible flow succeeds with the justified MTP assignment without allocating it to every call” evaluates an MTP can anchor or normalize media-related signaling requirements, but is not a generic substitute for transcoders. It would not confirm the collaboration outcome requiring voice translation profiles rewrite call-party numbers at the configured gateway boundary.

Question 225

For this Cisco collaboration support case: A SIP gateway presents a four-digit calling number that a provider rejects as invalid ANI. Which change most directly addresses the requirement?

  1. Inspect destination-pattern eligibility, dial-peer matching priority and the intended outbound peer configuration.
  2. Configure supported SIP server-group preference or alternative target logic for the VoIP dial peer.
  3. Validate tenant association, SIP peer matching and per-tenant authentication or header policies.
  4. Use a calling-party voice translation profile to map the internal extension to an authorized public number.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Calling-party translation is distinct from adjusting the destination being dialed. Apply the specific remedy: Use a calling-party voice translation profile to map the internal extension to an authorized public number. Verify it by checking: The carrier sees the valid approved caller identity and no longer rejects the same outbound test.

Incorrect Answers

A:

“Inspect destination-pattern eligibility, dial-peer matching priority and the intended outbound peer configuration” concerns iOS XE matches dial peers according to configured call-leg selection rules rather than interface order alone. The stated collaboration requirement instead depends on calling-party translation is distinct from adjusting the destination being dialed.

B:

“Configure supported SIP server-group preference or alternative target logic for the VoIP dial peer” concerns server groups enable controlled upstream target selection when redundancy is supported. The stated collaboration requirement instead depends on calling-party translation is distinct from adjusting the destination being dialed.

C:

“Validate tenant association, SIP peer matching and per-tenant authentication or header policies” concerns sIP tenants isolate compatible provider parameters without granting cross-tenant signaling reachability. The stated collaboration requirement instead depends on calling-party translation is distinct from adjusting the destination being dialed.

Question 226

For this Cisco collaboration incident — A SIP gateway presents a four-digit calling number that a provider rejects as invalid ANI. — what test result most directly establishes that the corrective work succeeded?

  1. The carrier sees the valid approved caller identity and no longer rejects the same outbound test.
  2. A voice dial-peer trace shows the selected peer matches the intended called number.
  3. With the preferred target unavailable, a test session reaches the approved alternate SIP server.
  4. A controlled conference combines all authorized parties with usable media.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Calling-party translation is distinct from adjusting the destination being dialed. This is decisive because the expected outcome is: The carrier sees the valid approved caller identity and no longer rejects the same outbound test.

Incorrect Answers

B:

“A voice dial-peer trace shows the selected peer matches the intended called number” evaluates iOS XE matches dial peers according to configured call-leg selection rules rather than interface order alone. It would not confirm the collaboration outcome requiring calling-party translation is distinct from adjusting the destination being dialed.

C:

“With the preferred target unavailable, a test session reaches the approved alternate SIP server” evaluates server groups enable controlled upstream target selection when redundancy is supported. It would not confirm the collaboration outcome requiring calling-party translation is distinct from adjusting the destination being dialed.

D:

“A controlled conference combines all authorized parties with usable media” evaluates conferencing involves media mixing or bridging capabilities beyond normal two-party RTP forwarding. It would not confirm the collaboration outcome requiring calling-party translation is distinct from adjusting the destination being dialed.

Question 227

At a Cisco collaboration site, engineers encounter: A site supports G.729 and G.711 but the WAN design requires a predictable preference order. What is the best targeted action?

  1. Use the supported DNS SRV lookup and resolver policy for the provider SIP destination.
  2. Separate the call legs into appropriately bound SIP dial peers or tenant policies and validate each route.
  3. Check voice translation rules and profiles applied on the selected inbound and outbound call legs.
  4. Configure an applicable voice class codec preference list on the IOS XE VoIP dial peer.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Codec preference order influences supported media negotiation but cannot override peer capability. Apply the specific remedy: Configure an applicable voice class codec preference list on the IOS XE VoIP dial peer. Verify it by checking: Negotiation selects the preferred mutually supported codec and meets the planned bandwidth profile.

Incorrect Answers

A:

“Use the supported DNS SRV lookup and resolver policy for the provider SIP destination” concerns DNS SRV can supply SIP service target and priority information without embedding one static server address. The stated collaboration requirement instead depends on codec preference order influences supported media negotiation but cannot override peer capability.

B:

“Separate the call legs into appropriately bound SIP dial peers or tenant policies and validate each route” concerns session-border policy must reflect each provider's signaling expectations and trust boundary. The stated collaboration requirement instead depends on codec preference order influences supported media negotiation but cannot override peer capability.

C:

“Check voice translation rules and profiles applied on the selected inbound and outbound call legs” concerns a dial peer may match correctly while a later translation still changes the digits incorrectly. The stated collaboration requirement instead depends on codec preference order influences supported media negotiation but cannot override peer capability.

Question 228

For this Cisco collaboration incident — A site supports G.729 and G.711 but the WAN design requires a predictable preference order. — what test result most directly establishes that the corrective work succeeded?

  1. A controlled DNS target change is reflected in subsequent authorized SIP routing.
  2. A test on each leg uses its correct signaling bind, peer identity and policy settings.
  3. Tenant A and B traffic each matches only its assigned peer and signaling policy.
  4. Negotiation selects the preferred mutually supported codec and meets the planned bandwidth profile.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Codec preference order influences supported media negotiation but cannot override peer capability. This is decisive because the expected outcome is: Negotiation selects the preferred mutually supported codec and meets the planned bandwidth profile.

Incorrect Answers

A:

“A controlled DNS target change is reflected in subsequent authorized SIP routing” evaluates DNS SRV can supply SIP service target and priority information without embedding one static server address. It would not confirm the collaboration outcome requiring codec preference order influences supported media negotiation but cannot override peer capability.

B:

“A test on each leg uses its correct signaling bind, peer identity and policy settings” evaluates session-border policy must reflect each provider's signaling expectations and trust boundary. It would not confirm the collaboration outcome requiring codec preference order influences supported media negotiation but cannot override peer capability.

C:

“Tenant A and B traffic each matches only its assigned peer and signaling policy” evaluates sIP tenants isolate compatible provider parameters without granting cross-tenant signaling reachability. It would not confirm the collaboration outcome requiring codec preference order influences supported media negotiation but cannot override peer capability.

Question 229

At a Cisco collaboration site, engineers encounter: Calls to one destination use an unexpected SIP carrier even though two outbound VoIP dial peers are defined. What is the best targeted action?

  1. Configure compatible RFC 2833/4733 DTMF relay and payload negotiation on both CUBE call legs.
  2. Use a calling-party voice translation profile to map the internal extension to an authorized public number.
  3. Inspect destination-pattern eligibility, dial-peer matching priority and the intended outbound peer configuration.
  4. Verify the configured SIP signaling bind interface and transport on the affected call leg.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

IOS XE matches dial peers according to configured call-leg selection rules rather than interface order alone. Apply the specific remedy: Inspect destination-pattern eligibility, dial-peer matching priority and the intended outbound peer configuration. Verify it by checking: A voice dial-peer trace shows the selected peer matches the intended called number.

Incorrect Answers

A:

“Configure compatible RFC 2833/4733 DTMF relay and payload negotiation on both CUBE call legs” concerns dTMF relay must match the peer's negotiated event method and payload interpretation. The stated collaboration requirement instead depends on iOS XE matches dial peers according to configured call-leg selection rules rather than interface order alone.

B:

“Use a calling-party voice translation profile to map the internal extension to an authorized public number” concerns calling-party translation is distinct from adjusting the destination being dialed. The stated collaboration requirement instead depends on iOS XE matches dial peers according to configured call-leg selection rules rather than interface order alone.

D:

“Verify the configured SIP signaling bind interface and transport on the affected call leg” concerns sIP bind settings govern transport-source behavior independently of the called number. The stated collaboration requirement instead depends on iOS XE matches dial peers according to configured call-leg selection rules rather than interface order alone.

Question 230

For this Cisco collaboration incident — Calls to one destination use an unexpected SIP carrier even though two outbound VoIP dial peers are defined. — what test result most directly establishes that the corrective work succeeded?

  1. A voice dial-peer trace shows the selected peer matches the intended called number.
  2. A gateway capture shows supported telephone-event packets and the IVR recognizes every test digit.
  3. The carrier sees the valid approved caller identity and no longer rejects the same outbound test.
  4. The previously incompatible flow succeeds with the justified MTP assignment without allocating it to every call.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

IOS XE matches dial peers according to configured call-leg selection rules rather than interface order alone. This is decisive because the expected outcome is: A voice dial-peer trace shows the selected peer matches the intended called number.

Incorrect Answers

B:

“A gateway capture shows supported telephone-event packets and the IVR recognizes every test digit” evaluates dTMF relay must match the peer's negotiated event method and payload interpretation. It would not confirm the collaboration outcome requiring iOS XE matches dial peers according to configured call-leg selection rules rather than interface order alone.

C:

“The carrier sees the valid approved caller identity and no longer rejects the same outbound test” evaluates calling-party translation is distinct from adjusting the destination being dialed. It would not confirm the collaboration outcome requiring iOS XE matches dial peers according to configured call-leg selection rules rather than interface order alone.

D:

“The previously incompatible flow succeeds with the justified MTP assignment without allocating it to every call” evaluates an MTP can anchor or normalize media-related signaling requirements, but is not a generic substitute for transcoders. It would not confirm the collaboration outcome requiring iOS XE matches dial peers according to configured call-leg selection rules rather than interface order alone.

Implementing Cisco Collaboration Core Technologies (CLCOR) (350-801) Practice Tests

Purchase Cisco CLCOR 350-801 Exam Training Products Individually

350-801 Questions & Answers
Premium File
421 Questions & Answers
Last Update: Nov 6, 2026
$59.99
350-801 Training Course
38 Lectures
$24.99
350-801 Study Guide
Study Guide
1435 Pages
$24.99
accept downloads in the last 7 days
What exactly is 350-801 Premium File?

The 350-801 Premium File has been developed by industry professionals, who have been working with IT certifications for years and have close ties with IT certification vendors and holders - with most recent exam questions and valid answers.

350-801 Premium File is presented in VCE format. VCE (Virtual CertExam) is a file format that realistically simulates 350-801 exam environment, allowing for the most convenient exam preparation you can get - in the convenience of your own home or on the go. If you have ever seen IT exam simulations, chances are, they were in the VCE format.

What is VCE?

VCE is a file format associated with Visual CertExam Software. This format and software are widely used for creating tests for IT certifications. To create and open VCE files, you will need to purchase, download and install VCE Exam Simulator on your computer.

Can I try it for free?

Yes, you can. Look through free VCE files section and download any file you choose absolutely free.

Where do I get VCE Exam Simulator?

VCE Exam Simulator can be purchased from its developer, https://www.avanset.com. Please note that Exam-Labs does not sell or support this software. Should you have any questions or concerns about using this product, please contact Avanset support team directly.

How are Premium VCE files different from Free VCE files?

Premium VCE files have been developed by industry professionals, who have been working with IT certifications for years and have close ties with IT certification vendors and holders - with most recent exam questions and some insider information.

Free VCE files All files are sent by Exam-labs community members. We encourage everyone who has recently taken an exam and/or has come across some braindumps that have turned out to be true to share this information with the community by creating and sending VCE files. We don't say that these free VCEs sent by our members aren't reliable (experience shows that they are). But you should use your critical thinking as to what you download and memorize.

How long will I receive updates for 350-801 Premium VCE File that I purchased?

Free updates are available during 30 days after you purchased Premium VCE file. After 30 days the file will become unavailable.

How can I get the products after purchase?

All products are available for download immediately from your Member's Area. Once you have made the payment, you will be transferred to Member's Area where you can login and download the products you have purchased to your PC or another device.

Will I be able to renew my products when they expire?

Yes, when the 30 days of your product validity are over, you have the option of renewing your expired products with a 30% discount. This can be done in your Member's Area.

Please note that you will not be able to use the product after it has expired if you don't renew it.

How often are the questions updated?

We always try to provide the latest pool of questions, Updates in the questions depend on the changes in actual pool of questions by different vendors. As soon as we know about the change in the exam question pool we try our best to update the products as fast as possible.

What is a Study Guide?

Study Guides available on Exam-Labs are built by industry professionals who have been working with IT certifications for years. Study Guides offer full coverage on exam objectives in a systematic approach. Study Guides are very useful for fresh applicants and provides background knowledge about preparation of exams.

How can I open a Study Guide?

Any study guide can be opened by an official Acrobat by Adobe or any other reader application you use.

What is a Training Course?

Training Courses we offer on Exam-Labs in video format are created and managed by IT professionals. The foundation of each course are its lectures, which can include videos, slides and text. In addition, authors can add resources and various types of practice activities, as a way to enhance the learning experience of students.

Enter Your Email Address to Proceed

Please fill out your email address below in order to purchase Certification/Exam.

A confirmation link will be sent to this email address to verify your login.

Make sure to enter correct email address.

Enter Your Email Address to Proceed

Please fill out your email address below in order to purchase Demo.

A confirmation link will be sent to this email address to verify your login.

Make sure to enter correct email address.

Still Not Convinced?

Download 20 Sample Questions that you Will see in your
Cisco 350-801 exam.

Download 20 Free Questions

or Guarantee your success by buying the full version which covers
the full latest pool of questions. (421 Questions, Last Updated on
Nov 6, 2026)

How It Works

Download Exam
Step 1. Choose Exam
on Exam-Labs
Download IT Exams Questions & Answers
Download Avanset Simulator
Step 2. Open Exam with
Avanset Exam Simulator
Press here to download VCE Exam Simulator that simulates latest exam environment
Study
Step 3. Study
& Pass
IT Exams Anywhere, Anytime!

SPECIAL OFFER: GET 10% OFF. This is ONE TIME OFFER

You save
10%
Save
Exam-Labs Special Discount

Enter Your Email Address to Receive Your 10% Off Discount Code

A confirmation link will be sent to this email address to verify your login

* We value your privacy. We will not rent or sell your email address.

SPECIAL OFFER: GET 10% OFF

You save
10%
Save
Exam-Labs Special Discount

USE DISCOUNT CODE:

A confirmation link was sent to your email.

Please check your mailbox for a message from [email protected] and follow the directions.