Pass Cisco ENCOR 350-401 Exam in First Attempt Easily

Latest Cisco ENCOR 350-401 Practice Test Questions, ENCOR Exam Dumps
Accurate & Verified Answers As Experienced in the Actual Test!

You save
$39.99
Save
Verified by experts
350-401 Premium Bundle
Exam Code: 350-401
Exam Name: Implementing Cisco Enterprise Network Core Technologies (ENCOR)
Certification Provider: Cisco
Bundle includes 3 products: Premium File, Training Course, Study Guide
accept downloads in the last 7 days
350-401 Premium Bundle
  • Premium File 763 Questions & Answers
    Last Update: Nov 1, 2026
  • Training Course 196 Lectures
  • Study Guide 636 Pages

Implementing Cisco Enterprise Network Core Technologies (ENCOR) 350-401 Practice Test 2

Question 10

During acceptance testing after choose a platform and design supporting stateful switchover with redundant supervisors., which evidence is most relevant?

  1. The same virtual gateway address answers after the active router fails.
  2. Measured busiest-hour utilization and drops remain within accepted limits.
  3. Broadcasts and STP topology changes do not traverse the routed boundary.
  4. A supervisor transition can occur without a complete cold reboot and route relearning.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

A supervisor transition can occur without a complete cold reboot and route relearning. This is the targeted operational evidence for the change. SSO maintains control-plane state across supported supervisor failover. Merely entering the configuration or seeing a management session is less conclusive than observing the resulting behavior.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This observation validates another operation: Provide a first-hop redundancy virtual gateway shared by the routers. FHRP preserves the client gateway address while active responsibility changes. It is not decisive evidence that the change under examination works as required. A relevant verification must exercise its particular control or forwarding outcome.

B:

This observation validates another operation: Right-size uplinks and oversubscription at the distribution layer. Aggregation capacity must reflect offered traffic rather than only access-port count. It is not decisive evidence that the change under examination works as required. A relevant verification must exercise its particular control or forwarding outcome.

C:

This observation validates another operation: Prefer routed boundaries where feasible to contain broadcast and STP scope. Layer-3 boundaries localize Layer-2 failure and convergence effects. It is not decisive evidence that the change under examination works as required. A relevant verification must exercise its particular control or forwarding outcome.

Question 11

A subnet uses two default gateways and endpoint addresses must not change during failure. What is the most appropriate corrective measure?

  1. Evaluate gateway redundancy with an FHRP supported by both routing platforms.
  2. Separate physical pathways and power domains for redundant links.
  3. Provide a first-hop redundancy virtual gateway shared by the routers.
  4. Design appropriate routed cloud connectivity and redundant WAN paths.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

FHRP preserves the client gateway address while active responsibility changes. The most direct remediation is provide a first-hop redundancy virtual gateway shared by the routers. A practical acceptance test is the same virtual gateway address answers after the active router fails. This distinguishes a configured intention from operational success.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This choice addresses a different situation: Operations wants gateway failover without relying on a shared virtual MAC protocol. A first-hop redundancy mechanism avoids per-host gateway changes on failure. It does not specifically correct the issue here: a subnet uses two default gateways and endpoint addresses must not change during failure.

B:

This choice addresses a different situation: A dual-homed campus still goes down when all uplinks share one fiber conduit. Logical link redundancy does not survive a single shared conduit cut. It does not specifically correct the issue here: a subnet uses two default gateways and endpoint addresses must not change during failure.

D:

This choice addresses a different situation: A cloud hosted application requires private reachability from branches. Cloud location changes the transport and dependency model without removing routing design. It does not specifically correct the issue here: a subnet uses two default gateways and endpoint addresses must not change during failure.

Question 12

An operator has applied the following change: provide a first-hop redundancy virtual gateway shared by the routers. Which observation best confirms it works?

  1. A monitored active gateway change does not require host default-route edits.
  2. The same virtual gateway address answers after the active router fails.
  3. A simulated conduit loss leaves an independent physical path operational.
  4. Loss of one connectivity circuit leaves an alternate approved route to the application.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The same virtual gateway address answers after the active router fails. This is the targeted operational evidence for the change. FHRP preserves the client gateway address while active responsibility changes. Merely entering the configuration or seeing a management session is less conclusive than observing the resulting behavior.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This observation validates another operation: Evaluate gateway redundancy with an FHRP supported by both routing platforms. A first-hop redundancy mechanism avoids per-host gateway changes on failure. It is not decisive evidence that the change under examination works as required. A relevant verification must exercise its particular control or forwarding outcome.

C:

This observation validates another operation: Separate physical pathways and power domains for redundant links. Logical link redundancy does not survive a single shared conduit cut. It is not decisive evidence that the change under examination works as required. A relevant verification must exercise its particular control or forwarding outcome.

D:

This observation validates another operation: Design appropriate routed cloud connectivity and redundant WAN paths. Cloud location changes the transport and dependency model without removing routing design. It is not decisive evidence that the change under examination works as required. A relevant verification must exercise its particular control or forwarding outcome.

Question 13

Operations wants gateway failover without relying on a shared virtual MAC protocol. Which action most directly addresses this situation?

  1. Evaluate gateway redundancy with an FHRP supported by both routing platforms.
  2. Right-size uplinks and oversubscription at the distribution layer.
  3. Prefer routed boundaries where feasible to contain broadcast and STP scope.
  4. Tune or redesign fast-failure detection and routing redundancy appropriate to the platform.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

A first-hop redundancy mechanism avoids per-host gateway changes on failure. The most direct remediation is evaluate gateway redundancy with an FHRP supported by both routing platforms. A practical acceptance test is a monitored active gateway change does not require host default-route edits. This distinguishes a configured intention from operational success.

Incorrect Answers

B:

This choice addresses a different situation: A new campus has hundreds of access ports and oversubscribed 1-Gbps uplinks. Aggregation capacity must reflect offered traffic rather than only access-port count. It does not specifically correct the issue here: operations wants gateway failover without relying on a shared virtual MAC protocol.

C:

This choice addresses a different situation: A team extends an oversized Layer-2 domain between buildings for convenience. Layer-3 boundaries localize Layer-2 failure and convergence effects. It does not specifically correct the issue here: operations wants gateway failover without relying on a shared virtual MAC protocol.

D:

This choice addresses a different situation: Users report long reconvergence after a distribution node fails. Convergence depends on detection, routing and forwarding rather than link count alone. It does not specifically correct the issue here: operations wants gateway failover without relying on a shared virtual MAC protocol.

Question 14

After implementing evaluate gateway redundancy with an FHRP supported by both routing platforms., which operational evidence should an engineer collect?

  1. Measured busiest-hour utilization and drops remain within accepted limits.
  2. Broadcasts and STP topology changes do not traverse the routed boundary.
  3. Link-failure testing shows intended convergence within the availability objective.
  4. A monitored active gateway change does not require host default-route edits.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

A monitored active gateway change does not require host default-route edits. This is the targeted operational evidence for the change. A first-hop redundancy mechanism avoids per-host gateway changes on failure. Merely entering the configuration or seeing a management session is less conclusive than observing the resulting behavior.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This observation validates another operation: Right-size uplinks and oversubscription at the distribution layer. Aggregation capacity must reflect offered traffic rather than only access-port count. It is not decisive evidence that the change under examination works as required. A relevant verification must exercise its particular control or forwarding outcome.

B:

This observation validates another operation: Prefer routed boundaries where feasible to contain broadcast and STP scope. Layer-3 boundaries localize Layer-2 failure and convergence effects. It is not decisive evidence that the change under examination works as required. A relevant verification must exercise its particular control or forwarding outcome.

C:

This observation validates another operation: Tune or redesign fast-failure detection and routing redundancy appropriate to the platform. Convergence depends on detection, routing and forwarding rather than link count alone. It is not decisive evidence that the change under examination works as required. A relevant verification must exercise its particular control or forwarding outcome.

Question 15

A new campus has hundreds of access ports and oversubscribed 1-Gbps uplinks. What is the most effective configuration or design response?

  1. Separate physical pathways and power domains for redundant links.
  2. Design appropriate routed cloud connectivity and redundant WAN paths.
  3. Right-size uplinks and oversubscription at the distribution layer.
  4. Eliminate the shared switching single point of failure in the gateway design.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Aggregation capacity must reflect offered traffic rather than only access-port count. The most direct remediation is right-size uplinks and oversubscription at the distribution layer. A practical acceptance test is measured busiest-hour utilization and drops remain within accepted limits. This distinguishes a configured intention from operational success.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This choice addresses a different situation: A dual-homed campus still goes down when all uplinks share one fiber conduit. Logical link redundancy does not survive a single shared conduit cut. It does not specifically correct the issue here: a new campus has hundreds of access ports and oversubscribed 1-Gbps uplinks.

B:

This choice addresses a different situation: A cloud hosted application requires private reachability from branches. Cloud location changes the transport and dependency model without removing routing design. It does not specifically correct the issue here: a new campus has hundreds of access ports and oversubscribed 1-Gbps uplinks.

D:

This choice addresses a different situation: The branch gateway is resilient but both routers attach to the same access switch. Router redundancy is insufficient if both depend on one switching component. It does not specifically correct the issue here: a new campus has hundreds of access ports and oversubscribed 1-Gbps uplinks.

Question 16

The change request says: right-size uplinks and oversubscription at the distribution layer. Which verification result is most decisive?

  1. A simulated conduit loss leaves an independent physical path operational.
  2. Measured busiest-hour utilization and drops remain within accepted limits.
  3. Loss of one connectivity circuit leaves an alternate approved route to the application.
  4. Failure of either access/distribution switch still leaves an operational gateway path.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Measured busiest-hour utilization and drops remain within accepted limits. This is the targeted operational evidence for the change. Aggregation capacity must reflect offered traffic rather than only access-port count. Merely entering the configuration or seeing a management session is less conclusive than observing the resulting behavior.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This observation validates another operation: Separate physical pathways and power domains for redundant links. Logical link redundancy does not survive a single shared conduit cut. It is not decisive evidence that the change under examination works as required. A relevant verification must exercise its particular control or forwarding outcome.

C:

This observation validates another operation: Design appropriate routed cloud connectivity and redundant WAN paths. Cloud location changes the transport and dependency model without removing routing design. It is not decisive evidence that the change under examination works as required. A relevant verification must exercise its particular control or forwarding outcome.

D:

This observation validates another operation: Eliminate the shared switching single point of failure in the gateway design. Router redundancy is insufficient if both depend on one switching component. It is not decisive evidence that the change under examination works as required. A relevant verification must exercise its particular control or forwarding outcome.

Question 17

A dual-homed campus still goes down when all uplinks share one fiber conduit. Which change should the network engineer prioritize?

  1. Separate physical pathways and power domains for redundant links.
  2. Prefer routed boundaries where feasible to contain broadcast and STP scope.
  3. Tune or redesign fast-failure detection and routing redundancy appropriate to the platform.
  4. Use a scalable leaf-spine or suitable fabric design rather than chained aggregation.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Logical link redundancy does not survive a single shared conduit cut. The most direct remediation is separate physical pathways and power domains for redundant links. A practical acceptance test is a simulated conduit loss leaves an independent physical path operational. This distinguishes a configured intention from operational success.

Incorrect Answers

B:

This choice addresses a different situation: A team extends an oversized Layer-2 domain between buildings for convenience. Layer-3 boundaries localize Layer-2 failure and convergence effects. It does not specifically correct the issue here: a dual-homed campus still goes down when all uplinks share one fiber conduit.

C:

This choice addresses a different situation: Users report long reconvergence after a distribution node fails. Convergence depends on detection, routing and forwarding rather than link count alone. It does not specifically correct the issue here: a dual-homed campus still goes down when all uplinks share one fiber conduit.

D:

This choice addresses a different situation: A datacenter adds east-west traffic requiring predictable latency. Equal-length fabric paths support predictable multipath connectivity. It does not specifically correct the issue here: a dual-homed campus still goes down when all uplinks share one fiber conduit.

Question 18

A post-change test follows this action: separate physical pathways and power domains for redundant links. Which result demonstrates success?

  1. Broadcasts and STP topology changes do not traverse the routed boundary.
  2. Link-failure testing shows intended convergence within the availability objective.
  3. Leaf-to-leaf traffic uses the fabric spines without traversing another leaf.
  4. A simulated conduit loss leaves an independent physical path operational.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

A simulated conduit loss leaves an independent physical path operational. This is the targeted operational evidence for the change. Logical link redundancy does not survive a single shared conduit cut. Merely entering the configuration or seeing a management session is less conclusive than observing the resulting behavior.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This observation validates another operation: Prefer routed boundaries where feasible to contain broadcast and STP scope. Layer-3 boundaries localize Layer-2 failure and convergence effects. It is not decisive evidence that the change under examination works as required. A relevant verification must exercise its particular control or forwarding outcome.

B:

This observation validates another operation: Tune or redesign fast-failure detection and routing redundancy appropriate to the platform. Convergence depends on detection, routing and forwarding rather than link count alone. It is not decisive evidence that the change under examination works as required. A relevant verification must exercise its particular control or forwarding outcome.

C:

This observation validates another operation: Use a scalable leaf-spine or suitable fabric design rather than chained aggregation. Equal-length fabric paths support predictable multipath connectivity. It is not decisive evidence that the change under examination works as required. A relevant verification must exercise its particular control or forwarding outcome.

Question 19

A team extends an oversized Layer-2 domain between buildings for convenience. Which remediation best resolves the described symptom?

  1. Design appropriate routed cloud connectivity and redundant WAN paths.
  2. Eliminate the shared switching single point of failure in the gateway design.
  3. Prefer routed boundaries where feasible to contain broadcast and STP scope.
  4. Separate management and production failure or trust domains as required.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Layer-3 boundaries localize Layer-2 failure and convergence effects. The most direct remediation is prefer routed boundaries where feasible to contain broadcast and STP scope. A practical acceptance test is broadcasts and STP topology changes do not traverse the routed boundary. This distinguishes a configured intention from operational success.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This choice addresses a different situation: A cloud hosted application requires private reachability from branches. Cloud location changes the transport and dependency model without removing routing design. It does not specifically correct the issue here: a team extends an oversized Layer-2 domain between buildings for convenience.

B:

This choice addresses a different situation: The branch gateway is resilient but both routers attach to the same access switch. Router redundancy is insufficient if both depend on one switching component. It does not specifically correct the issue here: a team extends an oversized Layer-2 domain between buildings for convenience.

D:

This choice addresses a different situation: A design mixes administrative and production services on one management path. Out-of-band management can remain reachable during data-plane outages. It does not specifically correct the issue here: a team extends an oversized Layer-2 domain between buildings for convenience.

Question 20

During acceptance testing after prefer routed boundaries where feasible to contain broadcast and STP scope., which evidence is most relevant?

  1. Loss of one connectivity circuit leaves an alternate approved route to the application.
  2. Broadcasts and STP topology changes do not traverse the routed boundary.
  3. Failure of either access/distribution switch still leaves an operational gateway path.
  4. Console/management reachability survives a production forwarding interruption.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Broadcasts and STP topology changes do not traverse the routed boundary. This is the targeted operational evidence for the change. Layer-3 boundaries localize Layer-2 failure and convergence effects. Merely entering the configuration or seeing a management session is less conclusive than observing the resulting behavior.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This observation validates another operation: Design appropriate routed cloud connectivity and redundant WAN paths. Cloud location changes the transport and dependency model without removing routing design. It is not decisive evidence that the change under examination works as required. A relevant verification must exercise its particular control or forwarding outcome.

C:

This observation validates another operation: Eliminate the shared switching single point of failure in the gateway design. Router redundancy is insufficient if both depend on one switching component. It is not decisive evidence that the change under examination works as required. A relevant verification must exercise its particular control or forwarding outcome.

D:

This observation validates another operation: Separate management and production failure or trust domains as required. Out-of-band management can remain reachable during data-plane outages. It is not decisive evidence that the change under examination works as required. A relevant verification must exercise its particular control or forwarding outcome.

Implementing Cisco Enterprise Network Core Technologies (ENCOR) (350-401) Practice Tests

Purchase Cisco ENCOR 350-401 Exam Training Products Individually

350-401 Questions & Answers
Premium File
763 Questions & Answers
Last Update: Nov 1, 2026
$59.99
350-401 Training Course
196 Lectures
$24.99
350-401 Study Guide
Study Guide
636 Pages
$24.99
accept downloads in the last 7 days
What exactly is 350-401 Premium File?

The 350-401 Premium File has been developed by industry professionals, who have been working with IT certifications for years and have close ties with IT certification vendors and holders - with most recent exam questions and valid answers.

350-401 Premium File is presented in VCE format. VCE (Virtual CertExam) is a file format that realistically simulates 350-401 exam environment, allowing for the most convenient exam preparation you can get - in the convenience of your own home or on the go. If you have ever seen IT exam simulations, chances are, they were in the VCE format.

What is VCE?

VCE is a file format associated with Visual CertExam Software. This format and software are widely used for creating tests for IT certifications. To create and open VCE files, you will need to purchase, download and install VCE Exam Simulator on your computer.

Can I try it for free?

Yes, you can. Look through free VCE files section and download any file you choose absolutely free.

Where do I get VCE Exam Simulator?

VCE Exam Simulator can be purchased from its developer, https://www.avanset.com. Please note that Exam-Labs does not sell or support this software. Should you have any questions or concerns about using this product, please contact Avanset support team directly.

How are Premium VCE files different from Free VCE files?

Premium VCE files have been developed by industry professionals, who have been working with IT certifications for years and have close ties with IT certification vendors and holders - with most recent exam questions and some insider information.

Free VCE files All files are sent by Exam-labs community members. We encourage everyone who has recently taken an exam and/or has come across some braindumps that have turned out to be true to share this information with the community by creating and sending VCE files. We don't say that these free VCEs sent by our members aren't reliable (experience shows that they are). But you should use your critical thinking as to what you download and memorize.

How long will I receive updates for 350-401 Premium VCE File that I purchased?

Free updates are available during 30 days after you purchased Premium VCE file. After 30 days the file will become unavailable.

How can I get the products after purchase?

All products are available for download immediately from your Member's Area. Once you have made the payment, you will be transferred to Member's Area where you can login and download the products you have purchased to your PC or another device.

Will I be able to renew my products when they expire?

Yes, when the 30 days of your product validity are over, you have the option of renewing your expired products with a 30% discount. This can be done in your Member's Area.

Please note that you will not be able to use the product after it has expired if you don't renew it.

How often are the questions updated?

We always try to provide the latest pool of questions, Updates in the questions depend on the changes in actual pool of questions by different vendors. As soon as we know about the change in the exam question pool we try our best to update the products as fast as possible.

What is a Study Guide?

Study Guides available on Exam-Labs are built by industry professionals who have been working with IT certifications for years. Study Guides offer full coverage on exam objectives in a systematic approach. Study Guides are very useful for fresh applicants and provides background knowledge about preparation of exams.

How can I open a Study Guide?

Any study guide can be opened by an official Acrobat by Adobe or any other reader application you use.

What is a Training Course?

Training Courses we offer on Exam-Labs in video format are created and managed by IT professionals. The foundation of each course are its lectures, which can include videos, slides and text. In addition, authors can add resources and various types of practice activities, as a way to enhance the learning experience of students.

Enter Your Email Address to Proceed

Please fill out your email address below in order to purchase Certification/Exam.

A confirmation link will be sent to this email address to verify your login.

Make sure to enter correct email address.

Enter Your Email Address to Proceed

Please fill out your email address below in order to purchase Demo.

A confirmation link will be sent to this email address to verify your login.

Make sure to enter correct email address.

Still Not Convinced?

Download 20 Sample Questions that you Will see in your
Cisco 350-401 exam.

Download 20 Free Questions

or Guarantee your success by buying the full version which covers
the full latest pool of questions. (763 Questions, Last Updated on
Nov 1, 2026)

How It Works

Download Exam
Step 1. Choose Exam
on Exam-Labs
Download IT Exams Questions & Answers
Download Avanset Simulator
Step 2. Open Exam with
Avanset Exam Simulator
Press here to download VCE Exam Simulator that simulates latest exam environment
Study
Step 3. Study
& Pass
IT Exams Anywhere, Anytime!

SPECIAL OFFER: GET 10% OFF. This is ONE TIME OFFER

You save
10%
Save
Exam-Labs Special Discount

Enter Your Email Address to Receive Your 10% Off Discount Code

A confirmation link will be sent to this email address to verify your login

* We value your privacy. We will not rent or sell your email address.

SPECIAL OFFER: GET 10% OFF

You save
10%
Save
Exam-Labs Special Discount

USE DISCOUNT CODE:

A confirmation link was sent to your email.

Please check your mailbox for a message from [email protected] and follow the directions.