Pass Cisco ENCOR 350-401 Exam in First Attempt Easily

Latest Cisco ENCOR 350-401 Practice Test Questions, ENCOR Exam Dumps
Accurate & Verified Answers As Experienced in the Actual Test!

You save
$39.99
Save
Verified by experts
350-401 Premium Bundle
Exam Code: 350-401
Exam Name: Implementing Cisco Enterprise Network Core Technologies (ENCOR)
Certification Provider: Cisco
Bundle includes 3 products: Premium File, Training Course, Study Guide
accept downloads in the last 7 days
350-401 Premium Bundle
  • Premium File 763 Questions & Answers
    Last Update: Nov 1, 2026
  • Training Course 196 Lectures
  • Study Guide 636 Pages

Implementing Cisco Enterprise Network Core Technologies (ENCOR) 350-401 Practice Test 1

Question 1

A campus has 70 access switches and the distribution layer is overloaded with cross-building transit. Which action most directly addresses this situation?

  1. Place routing between distribution and core tiers in a three-tier design.
  2. Use a collapsed-core two-tier distribution/access design.
  3. Use separate distribution devices with independent failure domains.
  4. Provide a first-hop redundancy virtual gateway shared by the routers.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

A dedicated core transports between distribution blocks without acting as the user edge. The most direct remediation is place routing between distribution and core tiers in a three-tier design. A practical acceptance test is traffic between distribution blocks traverses the routed core rather than a daisy-chained access switch. This distinguishes a configured intention from operational success.

Incorrect Answers

B:

This choice addresses a different situation: A small branch needs two switch tiers without a separate core chassis. Combining core and distribution is appropriate for a smaller campus with moderate scale. It does not specifically correct the issue here: a campus has 70 access switches and the distribution layer is overloaded with cross-building transit.

C:

This choice addresses a different situation: A redundant uplink exists but a single distribution chassis still fails all users. Two physical paths on one switch do not remove the chassis single point of failure. It does not specifically correct the issue here: a campus has 70 access switches and the distribution layer is overloaded with cross-building transit.

D:

This choice addresses a different situation: A subnet uses two default gateways and endpoint addresses must not change during failure. FHRP preserves the client gateway address while active responsibility changes. It does not specifically correct the issue here: a campus has 70 access switches and the distribution layer is overloaded with cross-building transit.

Question 2

An operator has applied the following change: place routing between distribution and core tiers in a three-tier design. Which observation best confirms it works?

  1. Access switches connect to a redundant combined distribution/core pair.
  2. The access switch retains reachability when one distribution chassis is powered off.
  3. The same virtual gateway address answers after the active router fails.
  4. Traffic between distribution blocks traverses the routed core rather than a daisy-chained access switch.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Traffic between distribution blocks traverses the routed core rather than a daisy-chained access switch. This is the targeted operational evidence for the change. A dedicated core transports between distribution blocks without acting as the user edge. Merely entering the configuration or seeing a management session is less conclusive than observing the resulting behavior.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This observation validates another operation: Use a collapsed-core two-tier distribution/access design. Combining core and distribution is appropriate for a smaller campus with moderate scale. It is not decisive evidence that the change under examination works as required. A relevant verification must exercise its particular control or forwarding outcome.

B:

This observation validates another operation: Use separate distribution devices with independent failure domains. Two physical paths on one switch do not remove the chassis single point of failure. It is not decisive evidence that the change under examination works as required. A relevant verification must exercise its particular control or forwarding outcome.

C:

This observation validates another operation: Provide a first-hop redundancy virtual gateway shared by the routers. FHRP preserves the client gateway address while active responsibility changes. It is not decisive evidence that the change under examination works as required. A relevant verification must exercise its particular control or forwarding outcome.

Question 3

A small branch needs two switch tiers without a separate core chassis. What is the most effective configuration or design response?

  1. Deploy an SD-Access fabric with overlay-based segmentation.
  2. Choose a platform and design supporting stateful switchover with redundant supervisors.
  3. Use a collapsed-core two-tier distribution/access design.
  4. Evaluate gateway redundancy with an FHRP supported by both routing platforms.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Combining core and distribution is appropriate for a smaller campus with moderate scale. The most direct remediation is use a collapsed-core two-tier distribution/access design. A practical acceptance test is access switches connect to a redundant combined distribution/core pair. This distinguishes a configured intention from operational success.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This choice addresses a different situation: A company wants policy-based campus segmentation without VLAN trunks across every building. A fabric decouples endpoint segmentation from the underlay topology. It does not specifically correct the issue here: a small branch needs two switch tiers without a separate core chassis.

B:

This choice addresses a different situation: A router reload interrupts control-plane adjacency despite redundant power. SSO maintains control-plane state across supported supervisor failover. It does not specifically correct the issue here: a small branch needs two switch tiers without a separate core chassis.

D:

This choice addresses a different situation: Operations wants gateway failover without relying on a shared virtual MAC protocol. A first-hop redundancy mechanism avoids per-host gateway changes on failure. It does not specifically correct the issue here: a small branch needs two switch tiers without a separate core chassis.

Question 4

After implementing use a collapsed-core two-tier distribution/access design., which operational evidence should an engineer collect?

  1. Endpoint traffic can follow VXLAN overlay paths across the routed campus underlay.
  2. Access switches connect to a redundant combined distribution/core pair.
  3. A supervisor transition can occur without a complete cold reboot and route relearning.
  4. A monitored active gateway change does not require host default-route edits.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Access switches connect to a redundant combined distribution/core pair. This is the targeted operational evidence for the change. Combining core and distribution is appropriate for a smaller campus with moderate scale. Merely entering the configuration or seeing a management session is less conclusive than observing the resulting behavior.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This observation validates another operation: Deploy an SD-Access fabric with overlay-based segmentation. A fabric decouples endpoint segmentation from the underlay topology. It is not decisive evidence that the change under examination works as required. A relevant verification must exercise its particular control or forwarding outcome.

C:

This observation validates another operation: Choose a platform and design supporting stateful switchover with redundant supervisors. SSO maintains control-plane state across supported supervisor failover. It is not decisive evidence that the change under examination works as required. A relevant verification must exercise its particular control or forwarding outcome.

D:

This observation validates another operation: Evaluate gateway redundancy with an FHRP supported by both routing platforms. A first-hop redundancy mechanism avoids per-host gateway changes on failure. It is not decisive evidence that the change under examination works as required. A relevant verification must exercise its particular control or forwarding outcome.

Question 5

A company wants policy-based campus segmentation without VLAN trunks across every building. Which change should the network engineer prioritize?

  1. Deploy an SD-Access fabric with overlay-based segmentation.
  2. Use separate distribution devices with independent failure domains.
  3. Provide a first-hop redundancy virtual gateway shared by the routers.
  4. Right-size uplinks and oversubscription at the distribution layer.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

A fabric decouples endpoint segmentation from the underlay topology. The most direct remediation is deploy an SD-Access fabric with overlay-based segmentation. A practical acceptance test is endpoint traffic can follow VXLAN overlay paths across the routed campus underlay. This distinguishes a configured intention from operational success.

Incorrect Answers

B:

This choice addresses a different situation: A redundant uplink exists but a single distribution chassis still fails all users. Two physical paths on one switch do not remove the chassis single point of failure. It does not specifically correct the issue here: a company wants policy-based campus segmentation without VLAN trunks across every building.

C:

This choice addresses a different situation: A subnet uses two default gateways and endpoint addresses must not change during failure. FHRP preserves the client gateway address while active responsibility changes. It does not specifically correct the issue here: a company wants policy-based campus segmentation without VLAN trunks across every building.

D:

This choice addresses a different situation: A new campus has hundreds of access ports and oversubscribed 1-Gbps uplinks. Aggregation capacity must reflect offered traffic rather than only access-port count. It does not specifically correct the issue here: a company wants policy-based campus segmentation without VLAN trunks across every building.

Question 6

The change request says: deploy an SD-Access fabric with overlay-based segmentation. Which verification result is most decisive?

  1. The access switch retains reachability when one distribution chassis is powered off.
  2. The same virtual gateway address answers after the active router fails.
  3. Measured busiest-hour utilization and drops remain within accepted limits.
  4. Endpoint traffic can follow VXLAN overlay paths across the routed campus underlay.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Endpoint traffic can follow VXLAN overlay paths across the routed campus underlay. This is the targeted operational evidence for the change. A fabric decouples endpoint segmentation from the underlay topology. Merely entering the configuration or seeing a management session is less conclusive than observing the resulting behavior.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This observation validates another operation: Use separate distribution devices with independent failure domains. Two physical paths on one switch do not remove the chassis single point of failure. It is not decisive evidence that the change under examination works as required. A relevant verification must exercise its particular control or forwarding outcome.

B:

This observation validates another operation: Provide a first-hop redundancy virtual gateway shared by the routers. FHRP preserves the client gateway address while active responsibility changes. It is not decisive evidence that the change under examination works as required. A relevant verification must exercise its particular control or forwarding outcome.

C:

This observation validates another operation: Right-size uplinks and oversubscription at the distribution layer. Aggregation capacity must reflect offered traffic rather than only access-port count. It is not decisive evidence that the change under examination works as required. A relevant verification must exercise its particular control or forwarding outcome.

Question 7

A redundant uplink exists but a single distribution chassis still fails all users. Which remediation best resolves the described symptom?

  1. Choose a platform and design supporting stateful switchover with redundant supervisors.
  2. Evaluate gateway redundancy with an FHRP supported by both routing platforms.
  3. Use separate distribution devices with independent failure domains.
  4. Separate physical pathways and power domains for redundant links.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Two physical paths on one switch do not remove the chassis single point of failure. The most direct remediation is use separate distribution devices with independent failure domains. A practical acceptance test is the access switch retains reachability when one distribution chassis is powered off. This distinguishes a configured intention from operational success.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This choice addresses a different situation: A router reload interrupts control-plane adjacency despite redundant power. SSO maintains control-plane state across supported supervisor failover. It does not specifically correct the issue here: a redundant uplink exists but a single distribution chassis still fails all users.

B:

This choice addresses a different situation: Operations wants gateway failover without relying on a shared virtual MAC protocol. A first-hop redundancy mechanism avoids per-host gateway changes on failure. It does not specifically correct the issue here: a redundant uplink exists but a single distribution chassis still fails all users.

D:

This choice addresses a different situation: A dual-homed campus still goes down when all uplinks share one fiber conduit. Logical link redundancy does not survive a single shared conduit cut. It does not specifically correct the issue here: a redundant uplink exists but a single distribution chassis still fails all users.

Question 8

A post-change test follows this action: use separate distribution devices with independent failure domains. Which result demonstrates success?

  1. A supervisor transition can occur without a complete cold reboot and route relearning.
  2. The access switch retains reachability when one distribution chassis is powered off.
  3. A monitored active gateway change does not require host default-route edits.
  4. A simulated conduit loss leaves an independent physical path operational.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The access switch retains reachability when one distribution chassis is powered off. This is the targeted operational evidence for the change. Two physical paths on one switch do not remove the chassis single point of failure. Merely entering the configuration or seeing a management session is less conclusive than observing the resulting behavior.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This observation validates another operation: Choose a platform and design supporting stateful switchover with redundant supervisors. SSO maintains control-plane state across supported supervisor failover. It is not decisive evidence that the change under examination works as required. A relevant verification must exercise its particular control or forwarding outcome.

C:

This observation validates another operation: Evaluate gateway redundancy with an FHRP supported by both routing platforms. A first-hop redundancy mechanism avoids per-host gateway changes on failure. It is not decisive evidence that the change under examination works as required. A relevant verification must exercise its particular control or forwarding outcome.

D:

This observation validates another operation: Separate physical pathways and power domains for redundant links. Logical link redundancy does not survive a single shared conduit cut. It is not decisive evidence that the change under examination works as required. A relevant verification must exercise its particular control or forwarding outcome.

Question 9

A router reload interrupts control-plane adjacency despite redundant power. How should the team implement the required behavior?

  1. Choose a platform and design supporting stateful switchover with redundant supervisors.
  2. Provide a first-hop redundancy virtual gateway shared by the routers.
  3. Right-size uplinks and oversubscription at the distribution layer.
  4. Prefer routed boundaries where feasible to contain broadcast and STP scope.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

SSO maintains control-plane state across supported supervisor failover. The most direct remediation is choose a platform and design supporting stateful switchover with redundant supervisors. A practical acceptance test is a supervisor transition can occur without a complete cold reboot and route relearning. This distinguishes a configured intention from operational success.

Incorrect Answers

B:

This choice addresses a different situation: A subnet uses two default gateways and endpoint addresses must not change during failure. FHRP preserves the client gateway address while active responsibility changes. It does not specifically correct the issue here: a router reload interrupts control-plane adjacency despite redundant power.

C:

This choice addresses a different situation: A new campus has hundreds of access ports and oversubscribed 1-Gbps uplinks. Aggregation capacity must reflect offered traffic rather than only access-port count. It does not specifically correct the issue here: a router reload interrupts control-plane adjacency despite redundant power.

D:

This choice addresses a different situation: A team extends an oversized Layer-2 domain between buildings for convenience. Layer-3 boundaries localize Layer-2 failure and convergence effects. It does not specifically correct the issue here: a router reload interrupts control-plane adjacency despite redundant power.

Question 10

During acceptance testing after choose a platform and design supporting stateful switchover with redundant supervisors., which evidence is most relevant?

  1. The same virtual gateway address answers after the active router fails.
  2. Measured busiest-hour utilization and drops remain within accepted limits.
  3. Broadcasts and STP topology changes do not traverse the routed boundary.
  4. A supervisor transition can occur without a complete cold reboot and route relearning.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

A supervisor transition can occur without a complete cold reboot and route relearning. This is the targeted operational evidence for the change. SSO maintains control-plane state across supported supervisor failover. Merely entering the configuration or seeing a management session is less conclusive than observing the resulting behavior.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This observation validates another operation: Provide a first-hop redundancy virtual gateway shared by the routers. FHRP preserves the client gateway address while active responsibility changes. It is not decisive evidence that the change under examination works as required. A relevant verification must exercise its particular control or forwarding outcome.

B:

This observation validates another operation: Right-size uplinks and oversubscription at the distribution layer. Aggregation capacity must reflect offered traffic rather than only access-port count. It is not decisive evidence that the change under examination works as required. A relevant verification must exercise its particular control or forwarding outcome.

C:

This observation validates another operation: Prefer routed boundaries where feasible to contain broadcast and STP scope. Layer-3 boundaries localize Layer-2 failure and convergence effects. It is not decisive evidence that the change under examination works as required. A relevant verification must exercise its particular control or forwarding outcome.

Implementing Cisco Enterprise Network Core Technologies (ENCOR) (350-401) Practice Tests

Purchase Cisco ENCOR 350-401 Exam Training Products Individually

350-401 Questions & Answers
Premium File
763 Questions & Answers
Last Update: Nov 1, 2026
$59.99
350-401 Training Course
196 Lectures
$24.99
350-401 Study Guide
Study Guide
636 Pages
$24.99
accept downloads in the last 7 days
What exactly is 350-401 Premium File?

The 350-401 Premium File has been developed by industry professionals, who have been working with IT certifications for years and have close ties with IT certification vendors and holders - with most recent exam questions and valid answers.

350-401 Premium File is presented in VCE format. VCE (Virtual CertExam) is a file format that realistically simulates 350-401 exam environment, allowing for the most convenient exam preparation you can get - in the convenience of your own home or on the go. If you have ever seen IT exam simulations, chances are, they were in the VCE format.

What is VCE?

VCE is a file format associated with Visual CertExam Software. This format and software are widely used for creating tests for IT certifications. To create and open VCE files, you will need to purchase, download and install VCE Exam Simulator on your computer.

Can I try it for free?

Yes, you can. Look through free VCE files section and download any file you choose absolutely free.

Where do I get VCE Exam Simulator?

VCE Exam Simulator can be purchased from its developer, https://www.avanset.com. Please note that Exam-Labs does not sell or support this software. Should you have any questions or concerns about using this product, please contact Avanset support team directly.

How are Premium VCE files different from Free VCE files?

Premium VCE files have been developed by industry professionals, who have been working with IT certifications for years and have close ties with IT certification vendors and holders - with most recent exam questions and some insider information.

Free VCE files All files are sent by Exam-labs community members. We encourage everyone who has recently taken an exam and/or has come across some braindumps that have turned out to be true to share this information with the community by creating and sending VCE files. We don't say that these free VCEs sent by our members aren't reliable (experience shows that they are). But you should use your critical thinking as to what you download and memorize.

How long will I receive updates for 350-401 Premium VCE File that I purchased?

Free updates are available during 30 days after you purchased Premium VCE file. After 30 days the file will become unavailable.

How can I get the products after purchase?

All products are available for download immediately from your Member's Area. Once you have made the payment, you will be transferred to Member's Area where you can login and download the products you have purchased to your PC or another device.

Will I be able to renew my products when they expire?

Yes, when the 30 days of your product validity are over, you have the option of renewing your expired products with a 30% discount. This can be done in your Member's Area.

Please note that you will not be able to use the product after it has expired if you don't renew it.

How often are the questions updated?

We always try to provide the latest pool of questions, Updates in the questions depend on the changes in actual pool of questions by different vendors. As soon as we know about the change in the exam question pool we try our best to update the products as fast as possible.

What is a Study Guide?

Study Guides available on Exam-Labs are built by industry professionals who have been working with IT certifications for years. Study Guides offer full coverage on exam objectives in a systematic approach. Study Guides are very useful for fresh applicants and provides background knowledge about preparation of exams.

How can I open a Study Guide?

Any study guide can be opened by an official Acrobat by Adobe or any other reader application you use.

What is a Training Course?

Training Courses we offer on Exam-Labs in video format are created and managed by IT professionals. The foundation of each course are its lectures, which can include videos, slides and text. In addition, authors can add resources and various types of practice activities, as a way to enhance the learning experience of students.

Enter Your Email Address to Proceed

Please fill out your email address below in order to purchase Certification/Exam.

A confirmation link will be sent to this email address to verify your login.

Make sure to enter correct email address.

Enter Your Email Address to Proceed

Please fill out your email address below in order to purchase Demo.

A confirmation link will be sent to this email address to verify your login.

Make sure to enter correct email address.

Still Not Convinced?

Download 20 Sample Questions that you Will see in your
Cisco 350-401 exam.

Download 20 Free Questions

or Guarantee your success by buying the full version which covers
the full latest pool of questions. (763 Questions, Last Updated on
Nov 1, 2026)

How It Works

Download Exam
Step 1. Choose Exam
on Exam-Labs
Download IT Exams Questions & Answers
Download Avanset Simulator
Step 2. Open Exam with
Avanset Exam Simulator
Press here to download VCE Exam Simulator that simulates latest exam environment
Study
Step 3. Study
& Pass
IT Exams Anywhere, Anytime!

SPECIAL OFFER: GET 10% OFF. This is ONE TIME OFFER

You save
10%
Save
Exam-Labs Special Discount

Enter Your Email Address to Receive Your 10% Off Discount Code

A confirmation link will be sent to this email address to verify your login

* We value your privacy. We will not rent or sell your email address.

SPECIAL OFFER: GET 10% OFF

You save
10%
Save
Exam-Labs Special Discount

USE DISCOUNT CODE:

A confirmation link was sent to your email.

Please check your mailbox for a message from [email protected] and follow the directions.