Visit here for our full Juniper JN0-351 exam dumps and practice test questions.
Question 161:
A network administrator needs to configure OSPF on a Juniper router to advertise a default route to other routers in the network. Which configuration statement accomplishes this?
A) default-metric with generate statement under [edit protocols ospf]
B) set routing-options static route 0.0.0.0/0 discard
C) set interfaces default-route advertise
D) set protocols bgp default-originate
Answer: A
Explanation:
Configuring OSPF to advertise a default route on Juniper routers requires using the “generate” statement under the [edit protocols ospf] hierarchy combined with default-metric configuration to inject a default route (0.0.0.0/0) into the OSPF domain as an external route. The generate statement creates and advertises routes into OSPF even when those routes don’t exist in the routing table, enabling the router to advertise itself as a default gateway for the OSPF area or autonomous system. The configuration typically includes specifying route preferences, metric types (Type 1 or Type 2 external routes), and metric values that other OSPF routers use when calculating paths to reach destinations outside the OSPF domain. When a router generates a default route into OSPF, it becomes an Autonomous System Boundary Router (ASBR) advertising external routes, and other routers install this default route in their routing tables with the configured metric, using it for traffic destined to networks not explicitly known in OSPF. The default route advertisement enables centralized internet gateway configuration where one or few routers provide external connectivity while other internal routers automatically learn the path to external destinations through OSPF, simplifying network configuration and enabling dynamic failover if multiple default route sources exist with different metrics. Alternative approaches include redistributing a static default route from the routing table into OSPF using export policies, but the generate statement provides cleaner implementation by creating the route specifically for OSPF advertisement without requiring the route to exist in the routing table. The metric configuration determines how other routers prefer among multiple default route sources, with lower metrics being preferred. OSPF default route advertisement is common in hub-and-spoke topologies where branch sites learn default routes pointing to headquarters routers that provide internet connectivity, in enterprise networks where core routers advertise defaults to distribution and access layers, and in service provider networks where PE routers advertise defaults to customer sites. This makes A the correct answer for OSPF default route advertisement configuration.
B is incorrect because while creating a static discard route for 0.0.0.0/0 adds a default route to the local routing table, it doesn’t automatically advertise that route into OSPF. The route would need to be redistributed into OSPF through export policies, and a discard route specifically drops matching traffic rather than forwarding it, making it inappropriate for default gateway purposes.
C is incorrect because Junos does not have a “set interfaces default-route advertise” configuration statement. Interface configuration doesn’t directly control routing protocol advertisement behavior—route advertisement is configured under protocol-specific hierarchies like [edit protocols ospf], not under interface configurations which define physical and logical interface properties.
D is incorrect because “set protocols bgp default-originate” configures BGP, not OSPF, to advertise default routes to BGP peers. While BGP and OSPF are both routing protocols, they use completely different configuration commands and operate differently. BGP default origination doesn’t affect OSPF route advertisement, and mixing BGP commands for OSPF configuration would fail.
Question 162:
A network engineer needs to prevent specific routes learned via OSPF from being installed in the routing table. Which Junos feature provides this capability?
A) Import policy under [edit protocols ospf]
B) Export policy only
C) Interface disable command
D) Firewall filter on lo0
Answer: A
Explanation:
Import policies under the [edit protocols ospf] hierarchy provide the capability to filter routes learned from OSPF before they are installed in the routing table, enabling selective acceptance or rejection of routes based on criteria such as route prefixes, next-hop addresses, route tags, or other attributes. Import policies in OSPF context control which routes received from OSPF neighbors are accepted into the routing information base (RIB), allowing administrators to prevent specific undesired routes from being installed while accepting other legitimate routes. Policy configuration uses match conditions specifying route characteristics to evaluate, including route-filter matching specific prefixes with exact, longer, orlonger, or upto specifications, tag matching on route tags applied by other routers, next-hop criteria, route type (internal, external type 1, external type 2), and area restrictions. Policy actions include accept installing routes in the routing table, reject preventing route installation, and modifications to route attributes like preference or metrics before acceptance. Multiple policy terms can be combined with different match conditions and actions, evaluating sequentially until a match occurs, with default deny at policy end rejecting unmatched routes. Import policies are applied per OSPF instance or per area, providing granular control over route acceptance. Common use cases include filtering routes from specific subnets that shouldn’t be used for forwarding, preventing route table pollution from incorrectly advertised routes, implementing route preference modifications for traffic engineering, blocking routes that overlap with local static routes, and protecting against route injection attacks or misconfigurations. Import policies differ from export policies which control route advertisement from the local router into OSPF rather than route acceptance from OSPF. While both policies use similar syntax and matching capabilities, import policies protect the local routing table from unwanted routes while export policies control what the local router advertises to neighbors. Import policy implementation requires careful planning because overly restrictive policies might block legitimate routes causing connectivity issues, while insufficiently restrictive policies might allow problematic routes to be installed. Best practices include starting with permissive policies and gradually adding restrictions based on operational requirements, testing policies in lab environments before production deployment, maintaining clear documentation of policy purposes and match criteria, and implementing logging to track rejected routes for troubleshooting. This makes A the correct answer for filtering OSPF-learned routes before routing table installation.
B is incorrect because export policies control which routes are advertised from the local router into OSPF, not which routes received from OSPF are installed in the routing table. Export policies filter outbound route advertisement while import policies filter inbound route acceptance. Using only export policies cannot prevent unwanted OSPF routes from being installed locally.
C is incorrect because interface disable commands shut down entire interfaces, preventing all protocol communication including OSPF neighbor relationships, not selectively filtering specific routes. Disabling interfaces is too coarse-grained for route filtering, as it prevents all OSPF communication rather than selectively accepting some routes while rejecting others.
D is incorrect because firewall filters on lo0 (loopback interface) protect the routing engine from unwanted management or control plane traffic, not filter routing protocol routes before installation in the routing table. Lo0 filters operate on packets destined to the router itself, providing control plane protection rather than routing table manipulation capabilities.
Question 163:
An administrator needs to configure VLANs on a Juniper EX Series switch to separate traffic between departments. Which configuration mode is used to create VLANs in Junos?
A) [edit vlans]
B) [edit interfaces vlan]
C) [edit routing-instances]
D) [edit security zones]
Answer: A
Explanation:
The [edit vlans] configuration hierarchy is the primary location in Junos for creating and configuring VLANs on Juniper EX Series switches, providing centralized VLAN definition including VLAN IDs, VLAN names, and associated Layer 3 parameters. VLAN configuration in this hierarchy defines VLAN identities that can be referenced throughout the switch configuration when assigning interfaces to VLANs, creating inter-VLAN routing, or establishing VLAN-based services. Each VLAN configured under [edit vlans] typically includes a descriptive name identifying its purpose (sales, engineering, guest), VLAN ID (802.1Q tag) between 1-4094 identifying the VLAN in Ethernet frames, optional Layer 3 interface configurations for inter-VLAN routing through Routed VLAN Interfaces (RVI) or IRB (Integrated Routing and Bridging) interfaces, and optional VLAN-specific parameters like MAC learning limits, flooding controls, or DHCP options. After defining VLANs in the [edit vlans] hierarchy, administrators assign physical switch ports to VLANs using interface configurations under [edit interfaces], specifying whether interfaces operate in access mode carrying single VLANs untagged or trunk mode carrying multiple VLANs with 802.1Q tagging. VLAN membership assignment connects physical interfaces to logical VLANs defined in the vlans hierarchy, enabling traffic segregation where devices on different VLANs cannot communicate at Layer 2 unless inter-VLAN routing is explicitly configured. Common VLAN use cases include departmental segmentation isolating traffic between organizational units, security zones separating trusted and untrusted networks, guest networks isolating visitor traffic from corporate resources, voice VLANs segregating IP phone traffic for quality of service, and management VLANs providing isolated administrative access to network devices. VLAN configuration best practices include documenting VLAN purposes and IP addressing schemes, maintaining consistent VLAN IDs across network infrastructure, reserving VLAN 1 for management only due to default VLAN security concerns, planning VLAN numbering schemes allowing future growth, and implementing VLAN pruning on trunk links to reduce unnecessary broadcast traffic. The hierarchical VLAN configuration model in Junos separates VLAN definition from interface assignment, providing cleaner configuration management compared to approaches where VLAN properties are configured on each interface individually. This makes A the correct answer for VLAN creation configuration mode.
B is incorrect because [edit interfaces vlan] doesn’t exist as a valid configuration hierarchy in Junos. While individual interface configurations under [edit interfaces] reference VLANs when assigning ports to VLANs, the VLANs themselves are defined under [edit vlans], not under an interface-specific VLAN hierarchy. VLAN definitions are centralized rather than interface-specific.
C is incorrect because [edit routing-instances] configures virtual routing and forwarding instances (VRFs) for routing isolation and multi-tenancy, not Layer 2 VLANs for traffic segmentation. While routing instances can contain VLANs as bridge domains, the primary VLAN definition location is [edit vlans]. Routing instances serve different purposes related to routing table separation.
D is incorrect because [edit security zones] applies to SRX Series security devices for firewall policy enforcement, not EX Series switches for VLAN configuration. Security zones define trust boundaries for firewall rules but don’t create VLANs. EX switches use [edit vlans] for VLAN configuration without security zone concepts.
Question 164:
A network engineer needs to implement link aggregation on a Juniper switch to increase bandwidth and provide redundancy. Which Junos feature should be configured?
A) Link Aggregation Group (LAG) or Aggregated Ethernet
B) Single interface only
C) BGP peering
D) OSPF cost modification
Answer: A
Explanation:
Link Aggregation Groups (LAG), also called Aggregated Ethernet (ae) interfaces in Junos terminology, provide the capability to combine multiple physical Ethernet interfaces into a single logical interface that increases bandwidth through parallel transmission and provides redundancy through automatic failover if member links fail. LAG implementation follows IEEE 802.3ad (now 802.1AX) standards for Link Aggregation Control Protocol (LACP) which dynamically negotiates link aggregation between devices, monitors link health, and redistributes traffic when member link status changes. Junos LAG configuration involves creating logical ae interfaces under [edit interfaces], assigning physical interfaces as members of aggregated groups, configuring LACP parameters including active or passive mode, system priority, and port priority, and applying VLAN configurations or Layer 3 addressing to the logical ae interface rather than individual member interfaces. LACP active mode initiates aggregation negotiation while passive mode responds to partner requests, and both ends typically configure active mode for faster convergence. Traffic distribution across member links uses hash algorithms based on Layer 2 (MAC addresses), Layer 3 (IP addresses), or Layer 4 (TCP/UDP ports) information to ensure packets within flows traverse the same physical link maintaining proper packet ordering, while different flows can use different member links maximizing aggregate bandwidth. When member links fail, LACP detects failures within seconds and removes failed links from the aggregation, redistributing traffic across remaining healthy links without disrupting the logical interface. LAG provides multiple benefits including increased bandwidth beyond single link capacity by multiplying throughput across member links, redundancy protecting against single link failures without connection interruption, load balancing distributing traffic across available paths, simplified configuration by managing single logical interface instead of multiple physical interfaces, and compatibility with spanning tree protocols preventing loops while using multiple paths. Common LAG deployments include server connections where network adapters bond multiple NICs, switch uplinks where access switches connect to distribution switches with multiple cables, storage networks requiring high bandwidth and reliability, and wireless controller connections supporting many access points. LAG configuration requires matching settings on both aggregation ends including number of member interfaces, LACP mode, and VLAN configurations. This makes A the correct answer for implementing link aggregation increasing bandwidth and providing redundancy.
B is incorrect because configuring only a single interface provides no bandwidth increase beyond that interface’s capacity and offers no redundancy if the link fails. Link aggregation specifically addresses these limitations by combining multiple physical interfaces. Single interfaces cannot provide the benefits that aggregation delivers through parallel transmission and automatic failover capabilities.
C is incorrect because BGP peering establishes routing protocol relationships for exchanging routing information between autonomous systems, not for combining physical links into higher-bandwidth logical interfaces. BGP operates at Layer 3 for routing decisions while link aggregation operates at Layer 2 for physical link combination. BGP configuration doesn’t provide link aggregation capabilities.
D is incorrect because OSPF cost modification adjusts routing metrics influencing path selection in OSPF routing domains but doesn’t combine physical interfaces or increase link bandwidth. OSPF cost affects routing decisions at Layer 3 while link aggregation combines physical Layer 2 links. Cost modification is a routing optimization technique unrelated to physical link aggregation.
Question 165:
An administrator needs to view the current OSPF neighbor status on a Juniper router. Which operational command displays OSPF neighbor information?
A) show ospf neighbor
B) show configuration ospf
C) configure ospf neighbor
D) delete ospf neighbor
Answer: A
Explanation:
The “show ospf neighbor” operational command displays current OSPF neighbor relationships on Juniper routers, providing real-time information about OSPF adjacency status, neighbor states, interface associations, and protocol health essential for troubleshooting and monitoring OSPF operations. The command output includes neighbor router IDs uniquely identifying each OSPF neighbor, interface names showing which local interfaces have OSPF neighbors, neighbor states indicating adjacency status (Down, Init, 2-Way, ExStart, Exchange, Loading, Full), neighbor priorities used in designated router elections, dead timers showing how long until neighbor relationships time out without hello packet reception, and neighbor IP addresses identifying neighbors at Layer 3. The Full state indicates healthy fully-established adjacencies where routers have exchanged complete topology information and synchronized their link-state databases, enabling proper route calculation. States other than Full or 2-Way (on broadcast networks where routers aren’t DR/BDR relationships) might indicate problems with adjacency formation including mismatched OSPF parameters like hello/dead intervals, area mismatches, authentication failures, or network connectivity issues. The command provides quick verification that OSPF is operating correctly with expected neighbors, identifies missing adjacencies that should exist based on network topology, detects stuck adjacencies in transitional states indicating problems, and confirms interface-to-neighbor mappings for documentation or troubleshooting purposes. Additional show commands complement neighbor status including “show ospf database” displaying link-state database contents, “show ospf interface” showing OSPF-enabled interfaces and their parameters, “show ospf route” displaying routes learned via OSPF, and “show ospf statistics” providing protocol packet counters. The neighbor information is crucial for OSPF troubleshooting because many routing problems stem from adjacency issues—if neighbors don’t establish Full state, routers cannot exchange topology information, calculate routes, or forward traffic properly. Neighbor status monitoring should be routine operational practice, checking that expected adjacencies exist after configuration changes, verifying adjacency health during troubleshooting, and confirming that neighbor counts match expected topology. Discrepancies between expected and actual neighbor counts often indicate configuration errors, network connectivity problems, or OSPF parameter mismatches requiring investigation. This makes A the correct answer for viewing current OSPF neighbor status operationally.
B is incorrect because “show configuration ospf” displays committed OSPF configuration statements from the configuration database, not operational neighbor status. Configuration display shows what is configured (areas, interfaces, authentication settings) but not whether those configurations result in working adjacencies or what neighbor states currently exist. Operational status requires show commands without “configuration.”
C is incorrect because “configure ospf neighbor” isn’t a valid command and mixes operational and configuration modes incorrectly. Junos separates operational commands (beginning with “show,” “monitor,” “ping”) from configuration commands (entered in configuration mode after “edit” or “configure”). OSPF neighbors are discovered dynamically through hello protocols, not manually configured in most scenarios.
D is incorrect because “delete ospf neighbor” isn’t a valid operational or configuration command. OSPF neighbors cannot be deleted directly—they are dynamically discovered relationships that form when OSPF routers exchange hello packets on connected interfaces. To remove neighbors, administrators must disable OSPF on interfaces or shut down interfaces, not execute delete commands.
Question 166:
A network administrator needs to configure port security on a Juniper EX switch to limit the number of MAC addresses that can be learned on an access port. Which feature provides this capability?
A) MAC address limit with persistent-learning
B) OSPF neighbor restriction
C) BGP peer limiting
D) VLAN count restriction
Answer: A
Explanation:
MAC address limiting with persistent-learning configuration provides port security capabilities on Juniper EX Series switches, restricting the number of MAC addresses that can be learned on specific interfaces to prevent MAC address table exhaustion attacks, unauthorized device connections, or network instability from excessive MAC learning. Port security configuration under [edit ethernet-switching-options secure-access-port] or using mac-limit statements enables administrators to specify maximum MAC address counts per interface, define actions when limits are exceeded (drop packets, generate alarms, disable ports), configure whether MAC addresses persist across interface state changes or reboots, and optionally specify allowed MAC addresses explicitly through static entries. When MAC address limits are configured, switches monitor learned addresses on each interface, increment counters as new MAC addresses are detected, and enforce configured limits by taking specified actions when limits are reached—either dropping packets from new MAC addresses while maintaining existing entries, or shutting down interfaces entirely preventing all traffic until administrative intervention occurs. Persistent MAC learning stores learned addresses in non-volatile memory surviving switch reboots, reducing relearning time after maintenance but potentially retaining addresses from devices no longer connected. Port security implementations commonly include configuring limits on access ports connecting end-user devices where typical requirements allow 1-5 MAC addresses accommodating computers, VoIP phones, and possibly personal devices, higher limits on ports connecting virtualization hosts where multiple virtual machines generate many MAC addresses, unlimited learning on trunk ports connecting switches or routers where many MAC addresses legitimately transit, and static MAC address assignment for critical devices requiring guaranteed connectivity. Port security protects against MAC flooding attacks where attackers generate thousands of frames with different source MAC addresses attempting to overflow MAC address tables and force switches into hub-like flooding behavior compromising network security and performance. Additional security measures often deployed with port security include DHCP snooping preventing rogue DHCP servers, dynamic ARP inspection protecting against ARP spoofing, and IP source guard validating source IP addresses against DHCP bindings. Port security configuration requires understanding legitimate device connection patterns to set appropriate limits without blocking authorized users while maintaining security against attacks or policy violations. This makes A the correct answer for limiting MAC addresses per port for security purposes.
B is incorrect because OSPF neighbor restriction doesn’t exist as a port security feature and wouldn’t limit MAC addresses on switch access ports. OSPF operates at Layer 3 for routing protocol relationships, completely separate from Layer 2 MAC address learning on switch ports. OSPF configuration doesn’t provide port-level MAC address security.
C is incorrect because BGP peer limiting controls the number of BGP routing protocol peering sessions a router maintains, not MAC addresses learned on switch ports. BGP is a Layer 3 routing protocol typically used for internet routing and doesn’t operate on switch access ports or control MAC address learning at Layer 2.
D is incorrect because VLAN count restriction isn’t related to limiting MAC addresses per port. VLAN restrictions might limit which VLANs are allowed on trunk ports, but don’t control how many MAC addresses can be learned per port within VLANs. VLAN configuration and MAC address limiting serve different security purposes with different configuration mechanisms.
Question 167:
A network engineer needs to configure Spanning Tree Protocol on a Juniper switch to prevent Layer 2 loops. Which STP variant is the default on EX Series switches?
A) Rapid Spanning Tree Protocol (RSTP/802.1w)
B) Token Ring
C) FDDI
D) ATM
Answer: A
Explanation:
Rapid Spanning Tree Protocol (RSTP), defined in IEEE 802.1w and later incorporated into 802.1D-2004, is the default Spanning Tree Protocol variant on Juniper EX Series switches, providing faster convergence than original Spanning Tree Protocol (STP) while maintaining backward compatibility with legacy STP implementations. RSTP operates by electing one switch as root bridge based on lowest bridge ID (priority plus MAC address), determining root ports on non-root switches as the lowest-cost path to root, selecting designated ports for each network segment as the best path to root from that segment, and blocking redundant paths by placing ports in discarding state to prevent loops while maintaining backup paths for automatic failover. RSTP improves convergence speed from STP’s 30-50 seconds to typically 1-6 seconds through several mechanisms including proposal/agreement handshakes for rapid transition to forwarding on point-to-point links, edge port designation immediately transitioning access ports to forwarding without delay, backup and alternate port roles providing pre-identified failover paths, and elimination of listening state reducing convergence delays. Port states in RSTP include discarding (blocking traffic), learning (building MAC address table but not forwarding), and forwarding (normal traffic forwarding), compared to STP’s disabled, blocking, listening, learning, and forwarding states. RSTP roles include root port (best path toward root), designated port (best path toward segment), alternate port (backup path to root), backup port (redundant connection to same segment), and disabled port (administratively down). When topology changes occur such as link failures or new links, RSTP rapidly recalculates active topology and transitions ports to appropriate states much faster than legacy STP, minimizing network disruption. RSTP configuration on Juniper switches includes enabling protocols under [edit protocols rstp], configuring bridge priority for root bridge elections, setting port costs and priorities for path preference, designating edge ports for access connections, and optionally configuring BPDU protection preventing loops from unexpected BPDU reception. Common deployment models include configuring root bridges in network core with low priority values, setting backup root bridges with slightly higher priorities, using RSTP at distribution and access layers while possibly running MST (Multiple Spanning Tree) in large networks, and leveraging edge port configuration on access ports for immediate forwarding. RSTP provides essential loop prevention for redundant Layer 2 topologies while enabling faster failure recovery than original STP. This makes A the correct answer for default STP variant on EX switches.
B is incorrect because Token Ring is a legacy Layer 2 LAN technology using ring topology with token-passing media access control, not a spanning tree protocol variant. Token Ring networks are largely obsolete and irrelevant to modern Ethernet switching. Token Ring has no relationship to spanning tree configuration on Juniper switches.
C is incorrect because FDDI (Fiber Distributed Data Interface) is an obsolete fiber-optic LAN standard using dual counter-rotating rings, not a spanning tree protocol variant. FDDI was used in 1980s-1990s for backbone networks but has been replaced by Ethernet. FDDI is unrelated to spanning tree protocol selection on EX switches.
D is incorrect because ATM (Asynchronous Transfer Mode) is a cell-switching WAN technology using fixed 53-byte cells, not a spanning tree protocol variant. While ATM was popular for carrier networks in the 1990s, it’s not related to Ethernet spanning tree protocols preventing Layer 2 loops on modern switches.
Question 168:
An administrator needs to verify the active route to a specific destination in the routing table. Which command displays the routing table on a Juniper router?
A) show route
B) configure route
C) delete route
D) edit route
Answer: A
Explanation:
The “show route” command displays the routing table (routing information base) on Juniper routers, showing all learned routes from various sources including static routes, connected interfaces, and dynamic routing protocols, along with active routes installed for forwarding traffic to destinations. The routing table output includes destination networks/prefixes showing reachable destinations, protocol sources indicating how routes were learned (Direct, Static, OSPF, BGP, RIP), next-hop addresses identifying forwarding destinations for reaching networks, route preferences (also called administrative distance) determining which protocol’s routes are preferred when multiple protocols advertise the same destination, metrics providing protocol-specific path costs for route selection within protocols, and active route indicators (typically asterisks) showing which routes are actually installed in the forwarding table for packet forwarding. Route preferences in Junos range from 0-255 with lower values preferred: Direct (0), Local (0), Static (5), OSPF internal (10), RIP (100), OSPF external (150), BGP (170), with preference determining which route is active when multiple protocols provide routes to the same destination. The command supports numerous options including “show route protocol ospf” displaying only OSPF routes, “show route table inet.0” showing IPv4 unicast routing table specifically, “show route destination x.x.x.x” displaying routes to specific destinations with more detail, “show route exact destination” matching specific prefix lengths, and “show route best” showing only active/best routes without alternatives. Understanding routing table output is essential for troubleshooting connectivity issues, verifying that routing protocols are learning expected routes, confirming route preferences when multiple paths exist, and determining which next-hops traffic will use for specific destinations. Administrators regularly use show route during troubleshooting to verify that necessary routes exist for unreachable destinations, identify why traffic takes unexpected paths, confirm that route preferences are configured correctly, and check that routing protocol neighbor relationships are producing expected routing information. The routing table distinguishes between routes present in the routing information base (all learned routes) and routes actually installed in the forwarding table (only best routes), with asterisks or “>” symbols indicating active forwarding entries. This makes A the correct answer for viewing the routing table operationally.
B is incorrect because “configure route” isn’t a valid command and confuses configuration and operational modes. Entering configuration mode requires “configure” or “edit” commands without additional keywords. Route configuration occurs within configuration mode using commands like “set routing-options static route” but “configure route” as a single command doesn’t exist.
C is incorrect because “delete route” would be used in configuration mode to remove configured routes like static routes, not to view the routing table operationally. Deletion commands modify configuration databases rather than display operational information. Viewing routing tables requires operational show commands, not configuration deletion commands.
D is incorrect because “edit route” isn’t a valid standalone command. In configuration mode, “edit” navigates to configuration hierarchies like “edit protocols ospf,” but “edit route” alone doesn’t constitute valid syntax. Route viewing requires operational show commands, not configuration edit commands meant for entering specific configuration hierarchy levels.
Question 169:
A network engineer needs to implement Quality of Service (QoS) on a Juniper router to prioritize voice traffic over data traffic. Which QoS component classifies traffic into different categories?
A) Behavior Aggregate (BA) classifier or Multifield (MF) classifier
B) Spanning Tree Protocol
C) ARP resolution
D) DNS lookup
Answer: A
Explanation:
Behavior Aggregate (BA) classifiers and Multifield (MF) classifiers are the QoS components in Junos that classify traffic into different forwarding classes and loss priorities, enabling differential treatment for various traffic types based on application requirements. BA classifiers categorize traffic based on a single field in packet headers, typically the Differentiated Services Code Point (DSCP) bits in IP headers or the IEEE 802.1p Class of Service (CoS) bits in Ethernet frames, providing simple classification based on existing QoS markings that upstream devices or endpoints have applied. MF classifiers provide more granular traffic classification by examining multiple packet header fields simultaneously, including source and destination IP addresses, source and destination ports, IP protocol types, DSCP values, and other characteristics, enabling classification based on application signatures or specific traffic flows even when QoS markings aren’t present. Once traffic is classified into forwarding classes (like expedited-forwarding for voice, assured-forwarding for business-critical data, best-effort for internet traffic), Junos applies different queuing, scheduling, and dropping behaviors ensuring that high-priority traffic receives preferred treatment. The QoS architecture includes classification determining which traffic belongs to which categories, policing enforcing rate limits on traffic classes, marking applying DSCP or CoS values for downstream QoS recognition, queuing buffering packets of different classes separately, scheduling determining transmission order and bandwidth allocation between queues, and shaping limiting transmission rates to prevent congestion. For voice traffic prioritization, typical implementations classify voice using MF classifiers matching RTP port ranges or Layer 4 signatures, or BA classifiers recognizing DSCP Expedited Forwarding (EF) markings (DSCP 46) that voice endpoints apply, place voice traffic in low-latency-low-jitter priority queues, guarantee minimum bandwidth for voice preventing starvation during congestion, and apply strict priority scheduling ensuring voice packets transmit immediately without delay. Data traffic typically receives lower priority classifications, occupies separate queues with larger buffers accommodating bursty traffic patterns, and receives remaining bandwidth after voice requirements are met. QoS implementation requires coordination across network devices applying consistent classification and prioritization, end-to-end QoS policies ensuring traffic maintains priority throughout transit, appropriate marking at network edges enabling internal devices to recognize traffic classes, and continuous monitoring verifying that QoS achieves desired performance outcomes. This makes A the correct answer for QoS traffic classification components.
B is incorrect because Spanning Tree Protocol prevents Layer 2 loops in switched networks but doesn’t classify traffic or implement Quality of Service. STP operates at Layer 2 for topology management, while QoS classification identifies and prioritizes different traffic types. STP and QoS serve completely different purposes with no functional overlap.
C is incorrect because ARP resolution maps Layer 3 IP addresses to Layer 2 MAC addresses enabling frame forwarding on local networks, but doesn’t classify traffic for QoS purposes. ARP operates at Layer 2/3 boundary for address resolution while QoS classification identifies traffic priorities. ARP is unrelated to traffic prioritization or classification.
D is incorrect because DNS lookup translates domain names to IP addresses for application connectivity but doesn’t classify traffic for Quality of Service. DNS operates at the application layer for name resolution while QoS classification examines packet headers for traffic categorization. DNS lookups don’t provide QoS classification capabilities.
Question 170:
An administrator needs to configure static routing on a Juniper router to specify the next-hop for a destination network. Which configuration hierarchy is used for static routes?
A) [edit routing-options static route]
B) [edit interfaces static]
C) [edit vlans static]
D) [edit security static]
Answer: A
Explanation:
The [edit routing-options static route] configuration hierarchy is where static routes are configured on Juniper routers, defining manually specified routes to destination networks with explicit next-hop addresses or egress interfaces rather than relying on dynamic routing protocols to learn paths. Static route configuration includes specifying destination prefixes in CIDR notation identifying networks reachable through the route, next-hop IP addresses indicating Layer 3 forwarding destinations, qualified-next-hop entries providing backup next-hops with different preferences for primary/backup path selection, route preferences (administrative distances) determining static route priority compared to routes from dynamic protocols, metrics providing tie-breakers when multiple static routes exist to the same destination with equal preferences, resolve and no-resolve options controlling recursive next-hop lookups, and retain and no-retain options determining whether routes persist during protocol flaps. Static routes serve multiple purposes including providing connectivity to networks not advertised by routing protocols, creating default routes pointing traffic toward internet gateways or core routers, implementing backup paths that activate when primary dynamic routes fail, and enabling small network routing without routing protocol overhead. Common static route implementations include default routes (0.0.0.0/0) directing traffic to internet gateways or next layer in routing hierarchy, host routes (/32 prefixes) directing specific IP address traffic through particular paths for policy routing or troubleshooting, and discard or reject routes sending matching traffic to null interfaces preventing routing loops or blackholing unwanted traffic. Static route configuration requires careful consideration of recursive resolution where next-hops might themselves require route lookups before forwarding can occur, route preference settings ensuring static routes don’t unintentionally override dynamic routes unless intended, and operational verification confirming that next-hops are reachable and routes become active. Static routing advantages include simplicity requiring no protocol configuration or maintenance, determinism with administrator-controlled paths rather than protocol calculations, and reduced overhead eliminating routing protocol bandwidth and CPU consumption. Disadvantages include scalability challenges as manual configuration becomes unwieldy in large networks, lack of automatic failover requiring administrator intervention when paths fail, and maintenance burden requiring manual updates when network topology changes. Mixed deployments commonly use dynamic routing protocols for automatic topology discovery and failover while supplementing with static routes for specific needs like default routes, backup paths, or policy routing. This makes A the correct answer for static route configuration hierarchy.
B is incorrect because [edit interfaces static] isn’t a valid configuration hierarchy. While interfaces are configured under [edit interfaces], there isn’t a “static” sub-hierarchy for interfaces. Static routes defining forwarding paths are configured under routing-options, not under interface configurations which define physical and logical interface properties.
C is incorrect because [edit vlans static] isn’t a valid hierarchy and VLANs are Layer 2 constructs for traffic segmentation, not routing configurations. VLANs are configured under [edit vlans] but don’t contain static routing configurations. Static routes defining Layer 3 forwarding paths exist under routing-options, separate from VLAN configurations.
D is incorrect because [edit security static] isn’t a valid hierarchy on routing platforms. Security configuration hierarchies exist on SRX Series security devices for firewall policies and zones, but static routes are configured under routing-options on all Junos platforms including routers and security devices, maintaining consistent routing configuration location across product lines.
Question 171:
A network engineer needs to troubleshoot connectivity issues and wants to verify that a specific IP address is reachable from the router. Which operational command tests Layer 3 connectivity?
A) ping
B) configure interface
C) delete static route
D) set vlan
Answer: A
Explanation:
The “ping” command is the fundamental operational tool for testing Layer 3 IP connectivity from Juniper routers, sending ICMP Echo Request packets to destination IP addresses and waiting for ICMP Echo Reply responses that confirm end-to-end reachability at the network layer. Ping functionality includes basic syntax “ping <ip-address>” sending continuous ICMP requests until interrupted with Ctrl+C, count option “ping <ip-address> count 5” limiting the number of packets sent, size option specifying packet sizes to test MTU issues or fragmentation behavior, source option selecting which local interface IP address to use as packet source for testing specific source-based routing or firewall rules, rapid option sending packets quickly for stress testing, and routing-instance option testing connectivity through specific VRFs when multiple routing tables exist. Successful ping responses confirm that forward and reverse routing paths exist between source and destination, that no firewalls or access lists block ICMP traffic, that destination devices are operational and responding to requests, and that network layer connectivity functions properly. Ping failure scenarios indicate various problems: “no route to host” or “destination unreachable” suggests routing problems where the local router or intermediate routers lack routes to the destination, timeout without responses might indicate firewalls dropping ICMP packets or destinations being offline, and TTL exceeded messages suggest routing loops where packets circulate without reaching destinations. Ping is typically the first troubleshooting step when connectivity issues occur, providing quick verification of basic IP reachability before investigating higher-layer problems. After confirming basic connectivity with ping, administrators might use traceroute to identify exact failure points along paths, use telnet or SSH to test specific application-layer protocols, or examine routing tables and ARP tables for configuration or state issues. Ping limitations include that some networks block ICMP for security reasons making successful pings impossible even when other connectivity exists, that ping only tests network layer reachability without verifying that applications function properly, and that ping from routers tests router-to-destination connectivity which differs from client-to-destination connectivity if routing differs. Despite limitations, ping remains the most universally used connectivity testing tool across all network operating systems and troubleshooting methodologies. This makes A the correct answer for testing Layer 3 connectivity operationally.
B is incorrect because “configure interface” isn’t a valid standalone command and enters configuration mode rather than testing connectivity. Interface configuration involves “edit interfaces” in configuration mode followed by specific interface hierarchy navigation. Configuration commands modify settings but don’t test connectivity or verify reachability.
C is incorrect because “delete static route” removes static route configurations but doesn’t test connectivity to destinations. Deletion commands modify configuration databases in configuration mode rather than performing operational verification. Testing reachability requires operational commands like ping, not configuration deletion commands.
D is incorrect because “set vlan” is a configuration command for creating or modifying VLANs but doesn’t test Layer 3 connectivity. VLAN configuration affects Layer 2 segmentation while connectivity testing requires Layer 3 operational commands. Configuration commands like set don’t provide connectivity verification capabilities.
Question 172:
An administrator needs to configure BGP on a Juniper router to exchange routing information with an external autonomous system. Which configuration statement establishes a BGP peer relationship?
A) neighbor statement under [edit protocols bgp group]
B) vlan member configuration
C) ospf area assignment
D) spanning-tree priority
Answer: A
Explanation:
The neighbor statement under the [edit protocols bgp group] configuration hierarchy establishes BGP peer relationships by specifying neighbor router IP addresses that the local router should attempt to connect to for exchanging routing information via BGP sessions. BGP configuration architecture uses groups to organize neighbors with common policies, where group types include internal for iBGP peers within the same autonomous system, external for eBGP peers in different autonomous systems, and other specialized types for specific scenarios. Within each group, individual neighbor statements identify specific peer routers using neighbor IP addresses that must be reachable for TCP session establishment on port 179, peer autonomous system numbers identifying which AS the neighbor belongs to, authentication keys when MD5 authentication is configured for session security, import and export policies controlling which routes are accepted from and advertised to specific neighbors, local address specifications determining which local IP the router uses for BGP sessions, and multihop configurations for eBGP sessions when peers aren’t directly connected. BGP session establishment follows a sequence where routers attempt TCP connections to configured neighbor addresses, exchange BGP Open messages containing AS numbers and capabilities, transition through BGP FSM states (Idle, Connect, Active, OpenSent, OpenConfirm, Established), and finally enter Established state enabling route exchange. Configuration verification requires checking that BGP is enabled globally, that autonomous system numbers are configured correctly, that neighbor IP addresses are reachable through routing tables, that any configured firewalls allow BGP traffic on TCP port 179, and that BGP parameters like AS numbers match between peers. Common BGP deployment scenarios include configuring eBGP sessions to internet service providers using external group type with provider AS numbers, establishing iBGP full-mesh or route-reflector hierarchies within enterprise networks using internal group type, implementing BGP for redundant internet connectivity with multiple ISPs using AS path prepending and local preference for traffic engineering, and deploying BGP in data center leaf-spine architectures using eBGP between devices. BGP peer configuration requires coordination between both routers since each must configure the other as neighbor with matching AS numbers and compatible policies. Troubleshooting BGP connectivity involves verifying physical connectivity and routing to neighbor addresses, checking that BGP configurations match between peers, examining BGP state machines using “show bgp neighbor” for stuck sessions, and reviewing BGP logs for negotiation failures or policy rejections. This makes A the correct answer for establishing BGP peer relationships through neighbor configuration.
B is incorrect because VLAN member configuration assigns switch ports to VLANs for Layer 2 segmentation but doesn’t establish BGP routing protocol relationships. VLANs operate at Layer 2 for traffic isolation while BGP operates at Layer 3 for inter-AS routing information exchange. VLAN membership and BGP peering are completely separate concepts.
C is incorrect because OSPF area assignment places router interfaces into OSPF areas for intra-domain routing but doesn’t configure BGP external routing relationships. OSPF and BGP are different routing protocols: OSPF is an interior gateway protocol for routing within autonomous systems while BGP is an exterior gateway protocol for routing between autonomous systems.
D is incorrect because spanning-tree priority affects root bridge elections in Layer 2 STP domains but has no relationship to BGP routing protocol configuration. Spanning tree prevents Layer 2 loops in switched networks while BGP exchanges Layer 3 routing information between autonomous systems. These protocols operate at different layers for different purposes.
Question 173:
A network engineer needs to verify which interfaces on a Juniper switch are currently operational. Which command displays interface status?
A) show interfaces terse
B) configure interfaces
C) delete interfaces
D) edit protocols
Answer: A
Explanation:
The “show interfaces terse” command provides a concise summary of all interfaces on Juniper routers and switches, displaying operational status, logical unit configurations, protocol families, and IP addresses in a compact table format ideal for quickly assessing interface states across entire devices. The command output includes interface names identifying physical and logical interfaces, administrative status (up/down) showing whether interfaces are enabled or disabled in configuration, link status (up/down) indicating whether physical layer connectivity exists with detected signals, protocol families (inet, inet6, mpls, iso) identifying which network protocols are configured, and IP addresses showing Layer 3 addressing for routed interfaces or IRB interfaces on switches. The terse format condenses information allowing administrators to view many interfaces simultaneously on a single screen, quickly identifying which interfaces are up and passing traffic, which interfaces are administratively disabled, which interfaces have physical layer problems preventing link establishment, and which interfaces have IP addressing configured. Interface status interpretation requires understanding that both administrative and link status must show “up” for interfaces to forward traffic normally, while “up/down” combinations indicate specific problems: administratively down interfaces have been intentionally disabled in configuration and require “delete interfaces <name> disable” or equivalent to enable, while physically down interfaces have configuration enabling them but lack detected signals indicating cable problems, transceiver failures, or remote device issues. Common interface status checks during troubleshooting include verifying that interfaces intended to be active show up/up status, identifying unexpectedly down interfaces requiring investigation, checking that IP addresses are configured correctly on routed interfaces, and confirming that logical units exist for subinterfaces or VLAN interfaces. Alternative interface commands provide more detail: “show interfaces” without terse displays extensive statistics and configuration details for all interfaces, “show interfaces <name>” targets specific interfaces with comprehensive information, and “show interfaces diagnostics optics” shows optical transceiver details for fiber interfaces. The terse format is particularly valuable during initial troubleshooting for rapidly surveying interface health across devices before drilling into specific interface details when problems are identified. Regular interface status monitoring helps detect failures quickly, verify that interfaces remain operational after maintenance activities, and document baseline interface states for comparison during troubleshooting. This makes A the correct answer for displaying concise interface operational status.
B is incorrect because “configure interfaces” isn’t a valid standalone operational command. Entering configuration mode requires “configure” or “edit” without additional keywords. While administrators configure interfaces under [edit interfaces] hierarchy in configuration mode, “configure interfaces” as a single command doesn’t display interface status or serve as an operational verification tool.
C is incorrect because “delete interfaces” would be used in configuration mode to remove interface configurations but doesn’t display interface operational status. Deletion commands modify configuration databases rather than provide status information. Viewing interface states requires operational show commands, not configuration deletion commands.
D is incorrect because “edit protocols” navigates to the protocols configuration hierarchy in configuration mode but doesn’t display interface status. Edit commands enter configuration hierarchy levels rather than showing operational information. Interface status viewing requires operational commands like show interfaces, not configuration mode navigation commands.
Question 174:
An administrator needs to configure VRRP on a Juniper router to provide gateway redundancy. Which protocol provides virtual router redundancy?
A) Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol (VRRP)
B) Spanning Tree Protocol
C) Address Resolution Protocol
D) Simple Network Management Protocol
Answer: A
Explanation:
Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol (VRRP), defined in RFC 5798, provides gateway redundancy by enabling multiple physical routers to share a virtual IP address that hosts use as their default gateway, with one router serving as master handling traffic while others serve as backups ready to assume master role if the current master fails. VRRP configuration on Juniper routers includes creating VRRP groups with unique group identifiers on interfaces where redundancy is needed, assigning virtual IP addresses that hosts use as gateways, configuring priority values (1-254) determining which router becomes master with highest priority winning elections, setting preempt mode allowing higher-priority routers to reclaim master role when they return after failures, and optionally tracking monitored interfaces or routes that reduce priority when failures occur enabling automatic failover based on upstream connectivity. VRRP operation involves the master router sending periodic advertisements at configured intervals (typically 1 second) asserting its master status, backup routers monitoring advertisements and maintaining timers to detect master failures, automatic failover occurring when backup routers stop receiving advertisements and the highest-priority backup transitions to master role, and gratuitous ARP transmissions by new masters updating network devices’ ARP caches with master’s MAC address for the virtual IP. VRRP provides several redundancy benefits including transparent failover to end hosts which continue using the same gateway IP address regardless of which physical router is active, fast convergence with default settings detecting failures within 3 advertisement intervals (3 seconds), support for multiple active/backup pairs using different VRRP groups for load distribution, and integration with interface or route tracking automatically failing over when upstream problems occur even if the router itself remains healthy. Common VRRP deployments include configuring redundant default gateways for access networks ensuring hosts maintain connectivity despite router failures, implementing active/active configurations using different VRRP groups for different VLANs distributing load across both routers, deploying VRRP at internet edges providing redundant exit paths with automatic failover, and combining VRRP with routing protocol authentication and interface tracking for robust failure detection. VRRP differs from proprietar.y protocols like Cisco’s HSRP through its open standard nature enabling multi-vendor deployments, while being similar in functionality providing virtual gateway redundancy. Configuration verification involves checking that VRRP group states show one master and remaining backups, that priority values are configured correctly with intentional master having highest priority, and that preemption settings match desired failover behavior. This makes A the correct answer for protocol providing virtual router redundancy.
B is incorrect because Spanning Tree Protocol prevents Layer 2 loops in switched networks by blocking redundant paths but doesn’t provide Layer 3 gateway redundancy. STP operates at Layer 2 for topology management while VRRP operates at Layer 3 providing redundant default gateways. These protocols serve different purposes at different OSI layers.
C is incorrect because Address Resolution Protocol maps IP addresses to MAC addresses enabling Layer 2 frame delivery but doesn’t provide gateway redundancy. ARP is used by VRRP when new masters send gratuitous ARP to update network devices, but ARP itself doesn’t implement redundancy or failover mechanisms.
D is incorrect because Simple Network Management Protocol provides network monitoring and management capabilities but doesn’t implement gateway redundancy. SNMP enables administrators to monitor VRRP status remotely but doesn’t provide the redundancy functionality itself. SNMP and VRRP serve completely different purposes in network architecture.
Question 175:
A network administrator needs to configure ACLs on a Juniper router to filter traffic based on source and destination addresses. What are firewall filters called in Junos terminology?
A) Firewall filters or packet filters
B) VLAN assignments
C) Routing instances
D) OSPF areas
Answer: A
Explanation:
Firewall filters (also called packet filters) in Junos terminology implement Access Control Lists (ACLs) that filter traffic based on packet header criteria including source and destination IP addresses, source and destination ports, IP protocols, TCP flags, ICMP types, and other characteristics, with filters applied to interfaces controlling which traffic is permitted or denied in specific directions. Firewall filter configuration includes defining filters under [edit firewall] hierarchy with descriptive filter names, creating terms within filters that represent individual rules with match conditions and actions, specifying match criteria identifying traffic characteristics to evaluate, defining actions taken when traffic matches including accept (permit), discard (drop silently), reject (drop with ICMP notification), count, log, or policer rate-limiting, and applying filters to interfaces or routing contexts specifying direction (input/output) and interface targets. Filter terms evaluate sequentially from first to last until a match occurs, with matched terms’ actions applied and evaluation stopping, while unmatched traffic hits an implicit deny at filter end requiring explicit permit statements for desired traffic. Common match conditions include “from source-address” and “from destination-address” matching IP addresses or prefixes, “from protocol” matching IP protocol types (TCP, UDP, ICMP, etc.), “from source-port” and “from destination-port” matching Layer 4 ports, “from tcp-flags” matching TCP flag combinations for state tracking, and “from icmp-type” matching specific ICMP message types. Actions beyond simple permit/deny include “count” creating packet and byte counters for matched traffic enabling statistics collection, “log” generating system logs when traffic matches enabling security auditing, “syslog” sending match notifications to remote logging servers, “policer” applying rate limits to matched traffic for bandwidth management, and “routing-instance” redirecting traffic to specific VRFs for policy routing. Firewall filter applications include security access control blocking unwanted traffic from entering or leaving networks, DDoS protection rate-limiting specific traffic types preventing resource exhaustion, QoS implementation marking or prioritizing traffic based on classifications, policy routing steering traffic through specific paths based on characteristics, and troubleshooting temporarily permitting traffic while logging matches for analysis. Filter design best practices include explicit deny-all at filter end catching unmatched traffic, most specific rules first since evaluation stops at first match, count/log terms for visibility into filtered traffic, and documentation through filter and term names explaining purposes. Filters can be applied as interface filters (inbound/outbound on physical interfaces), loopback filters protecting routing engine, or transit filters on transit traffic between interfaces. This makes A the correct answer for Junos traffic filtering mechanism terminology.
B is incorrect because VLAN assignments place switch ports into Layer 2 broadcast domains but don’t filter traffic based on packet headers or implement access control. VLANs provide segmentation while firewall filters provide security and traffic control. These serve different purposes with VLAN configuration being separate from firewall filter configuration.
C is incorrect because routing instances create separate routing tables for VRF-style routing isolation but don’t filter traffic based on addresses or ports. While firewall filters can redirect traffic to routing instances, routing instances themselves aren’t the filtering mechanism. Routing instances and firewall filters serve complementary but distinct purposes.
D is incorrect because OSPF areas organize routers within OSPF routing domains for scalability but don’t filter traffic based on packet headers. OSPF areas affect routing topology and link-state database scope while firewall filters control traffic forwarding based on security or policy requirements. These concepts operate in different contexts.
Question 176:
A network engineer needs to verify the MAC address table on a Juniper switch to troubleshoot Layer 2 connectivity. Which command displays learned MAC addresses?
A) show ethernet-switching table
B) configure mac-address
C) delete arp table
D) edit routing-options
Answer: A
Explanation:
The “show ethernet-switching table” command displays the MAC address table (also called the bridge table or forwarding database) on Juniper EX Series switches, showing learned MAC addresses, associated VLANs, interfaces where addresses were learned, and aging information critical for troubleshooting Layer 2 forwarding and connectivity issues. The command output includes MAC addresses in colon-separated hexadecimal format identifying network device hardware addresses, VLAN IDs showing which VLANs contain the MAC addresses, interface names indicating which switch ports or aggregated links learned the addresses, entry types distinguishing between dynamic entries learned from traffic, static entries manually configured, and permanent entries for switch management, and age information showing how long since addresses were last seen in traffic. The MAC address table functions as the switch’s forwarding database where destination MAC addresses in frames are looked up to determine output interfaces, with switches learning source MAC addresses from received frames and associating them with ingress interfaces, aging out entries that haven’t been refreshed within aging timers (typically 300 seconds), and flooding frames to unknown destinations across all VLAN ports when destination addresses aren’t in the table. Troubleshooting with MAC address tables involves verifying that expected devices’ MAC addresses appear in the table confirming successful learning, checking that MAC addresses are learned on correct interfaces identifying potential wiring errors or connection problems, confirming VLAN associations match expected configurations detecting VLAN misconfigurations, identifying MAC address table exhaustion if tables are full preventing new address learning, and detecting MAC address flapping where addresses appear on multiple interfaces suggesting loops or duplicate addresses. Common MAC table issues include missing entries indicating devices haven’t sent traffic or aging timers expired too quickly, wrong interface associations suggesting incorrect cabling or network topology problems, entries in wrong VLANs pointing to VLAN configuration mismatches, and constantly flapping addresses often indicating Layer 2 loops despite spanning tree or misconfigured link aggregation. Additional commands complement MAC table viewing including “show ethernet-switching table brief” for summarized output, “show ethernet-switching table interface” filtering by specific interfaces, “show ethernet-switching table vlan” filtering by VLAN, and “clear ethernet-switching table” forcing table refresh during troubleshooting. Understanding MAC address learning and table operation is fundamental to Layer 2 troubleshooting since switches rely entirely on MAC tables for forwarding decisions. This makes A the correct answer for viewing the learned MAC address table on switches.
B is incorrect because “configure mac-address” isn’t a valid operational command. While MAC addresses might be statically configured under various hierarchies in configuration mode, “configure mac-address” as a standalone command doesn’t exist. Viewing learned MAC addresses requires operational show commands, not configuration commands.
C is incorrect because “delete arp table” might clear ARP cache entries (Layer 3 address-to-MAC mappings) but doesn’t display the ethernet-switching MAC address table (Layer 2 MAC-to-interface mappings). ARP and MAC tables serve related but different purposes: ARP maps IP to MAC while MAC tables map MAC to interface. Deletion commands don’t display tables.
D is incorrect because “edit routing-options” navigates to routing configuration hierarchy in configuration mode but doesn’t display the MAC address forwarding table. Routing options configure Layer 3 routing behavior while MAC address tables operate at Layer 2 for frame forwarding. These operate at different layers with separate operational commands.
Question 177:
An administrator needs to configure DHCP relay on a Juniper router to forward DHCP requests from clients to a remote DHCP server. Which configuration enables DHCP relay functionality?
A) dhcp-relay server-group under [edit forwarding-options]
B) static arp entries
C) ospf hello timers
D) vlan spanning tree
Answer: A
Explanation:
DHCP relay configuration under the [edit forwarding-options dhcp-relay] hierarchy enables routers to intercept DHCP broadcast requests from clients on local networks and forward them as unicast packets to remote DHCP servers, enabling centralized DHCP server deployment without requiring servers on every subnet. DHCP relay configuration includes creating server-groups containing IP addresses of DHCP servers that should receive relayed requests, applying relay configuration to interfaces or VLANs where DHCP clients connect, optionally configuring relay options like circuit-id or remote-id providing additional information to DHCP servers about client locations, setting maximum hop counts limiting relay chains, and enabling relay statistics for monitoring. DHCP relay operation involves routers receiving DHCP broadcast discovery messages from clients, examining packets and identifying them as DHCP requests requiring relay, setting the gateway address (giaddr) field in DHCP packets to the interface IP address where requests arrived enabling servers to determine appropriate address pools, forwarding requests as unicast to configured DHCP servers, receiving unicast DHCP responses from servers, and relaying responses back to clients as broadcasts or unicasts depending on DHCP message types. Multiple server-group entries enable load distribution and redundancy where relays forward requests to all configured servers providing fault tolerance if individual servers fail. DHCP relay benefits include centralizing DHCP server management eliminating servers on every subnet, reducing DHCP server count and associated maintenance, enabling standardized DHCP policies across the enterprise, and simplifying DHCP server upgrades or changes without touching every network segment. Common deployments include configuring DHCP relay on distribution routers serving as default gateways for access networks, implementing relay on first-hop routers in branch offices forwarding to headquarters DHCP servers, and using relay in data center top-of-rack switches forwarding to centralized DHCP services. DHCP relay configuration should include relay for both IPv4 (DHCPv4) and IPv6 (DHCPv6) when dual-stack addressing is implemented, consideration of DHCP security features like DHCP snooping and Dynamic ARP Inspection preventing rogue DHCP servers, and monitoring relay statistics verifying that forwards and responses occur normally. Troubleshooting DHCP relay involves verifying relay configuration is applied to correct interfaces, checking that routes exist to configured DHCP servers, confirming DHCP server accessibility through ping tests, and examining relay statistics for forwarded requests and received responses. This makes A the correct answer for enabling DHCP relay functionality.
B is incorrect because static ARP entries manually map IP addresses to MAC addresses bypassing normal ARP learning but don’t forward DHCP requests to remote servers. Static ARP is used for specific devices requiring permanent mappings but doesn’t implement DHCP relay functionality. ARP and DHCP relay serve completely different purposes.
C is incorrect because OSPF hello timers control how frequently OSPF routers send hello packets for neighbor relationship maintenance but have no relationship to DHCP relay. OSPF is a routing protocol while DHCP relay forwards address assignment requests. These operate independently with separate configurations.
D is incorrect because VLAN spanning tree prevents Layer 2 loops within VLANs but doesn’t forward DHCP requests to remote servers. Spanning tree operates at Layer 2 for loop prevention while DHCP relay operates at Layer 3 forwarding broadcast requests as unicast. These protocols serve different purposes at different layers.
Question 178:
A network engineer needs to implement loop prevention on a Juniper switch without using Spanning Tree Protocol. Which Junos feature provides loop prevention at Layer 2?
A) Storm control or loop-detect protocol
B) BGP route reflection
C) OSPF virtual links
D) Static routing preferences
Answer: A
Explanation:
Storm control and loop-detect protocol provide loop prevention mechanisms on Juniper switches that complement or substitute for Spanning Tree Protocol in preventing Layer 2 loops and broadcast storms. Storm control limits the rate of broadcast, multicast, or unknown unicast traffic on interfaces, preventing loops from consuming all bandwidth with exponentially multiplying flooded frames by detecting when traffic rates exceed configured thresholds and taking action like blocking traffic or shutting down interfaces. Storm control configuration includes setting bandwidth percentage thresholds for different traffic types (broadcast, multicast, unknown-unicast), defining actions when thresholds are exceeded (filter, shutdown), configuring recovery mechanisms for shut interfaces, and monitoring storm control statistics. Loop-detect protocol actively detects loops by sending periodic loop-detect PDUs (protocol data units) on VLAN interfaces, monitoring whether PDUs return to the sending interface indicating loops, and taking configured actions like blocking interfaces or generating alarms when loops are detected. Both mechanisms provide protection against loops without maintaining spanning tree state machines or blocking ports preemptively, instead allowing all ports to forward unless loops are actively detected. Storm control prevents loop consequences by rate-limiting traffic that loops create, while loop-detect identifies and blocks actual loop conditions. These features are particularly useful in networks where spanning tree causes operational challenges like: convergence delays during topology changes causing temporary connectivity loss, interoperability issues with non-Juniper equipment implementing spanning tree differently, operational complexity in maintaining consistent spanning tree priorities and path costs, or specific topologies like ring networks where alternative loop prevention mechanisms are preferred. Some deployments disable spanning tree and rely entirely on loop-detect protocol combined with proper physical topology management ensuring loops cannot form physically. Other deployments run spanning tree as baseline protection while adding storm control as defense-in-depth preventing broadcast storms from overwhelming networks if spanning tree fails or during convergence. Best practices include implementing multiple loop prevention layers for redundancy, careful physical topology documentation preventing accidental loop creation, monitoring storm control and loop-detect logs for early warning signs, and testing loop scenarios in labs before deployment. Neither storm control nor loop-detect can fully replace spanning tree in most networks because they react to existing loops rather than preventing all potential loop scenarios proactively, but they provide valuable supplementary protection and alternatives for specific use cases. This makes A the correct answer for loop prevention features beyond spanning tree.
B is incorrect because BGP route reflection reduces iBGP full-mesh requirements in large networks by designating route reflectors that redistribute routes among iBGP peers, but doesn’t prevent Layer 2 loops. BGP operates at Layer 3 for routing information exchange while loop prevention operates at Layer 2 controlling frame forwarding.
C is incorrect because OSPF virtual links provide connectivity through transit areas when physical connections to backbone area don’t exist, but don’t prevent Layer 2 loops. OSPF is a Layer 3 routing protocol while loop prevention addresses Layer 2 switching concerns. OSPF virtual links and loop prevention operate at different layers.
D is incorrect because static routing preferences (administrative distances) determine which routes are preferred when multiple routing sources provide routes to same destinations, but don’t prevent Layer 2 loops. Routing preferences affect Layer 3 forwarding decisions while loop prevention operates at Layer 2 ensuring frames don’t circulate indefinitely.
Question 179:
An administrator needs to configure port mirroring on a Juniper switch to capture traffic for analysis. What is port mirroring called in Junos terminology?
A) Analyzer or port mirroring
B) VLAN trunking
C) Link aggregation
D) Spanning tree root
Answer: A
Explanation:
Analyzer (or port mirroring) functionality in Junos enables copying traffic from monitored interfaces to analysis interfaces where packet capture tools, network analyzers, or security monitoring systems can examine traffic for troubleshooting, security analysis, or performance monitoring purposes. Analyzer configuration under [edit forwarding-options analyzer] includes naming analyzers for referential clarity, specifying input interfaces or VLANs whose traffic should be mirrored, defining output interfaces where copied traffic is sent to connected analysis tools, selecting traffic direction to mirror (input, output, or both), optionally applying filters limiting which packets are mirrored based on addresses, protocols, or other criteria to reduce analysis traffic volume, and setting loss-priority if mirrored traffic should be dropped during congestion protecting production traffic. Junos supports multiple analyzer types including local analyzers sending mirrored traffic to physical ports on the same switch, remote analyzers (RSPAN) where mirrored traffic traverses VLANs to remote switches, and encapsulated remote analyzers using tunnels to deliver mirrored traffic across Layer 3 networks. Port mirroring creates exact copies of frames traversing monitored interfaces without affecting original traffic, enabling passive monitoring where analysis tools observe traffic without inserting themselves inline disrupting production flows. Common use cases include troubleshooting application performance problems by capturing and analyzing traffic flows between clients and servers, security monitoring where IDS/IPS systems examine traffic for malicious patterns or policy violations, forensic investigation analyzing historical traffic during security incidents, capacity planning measuring actual bandwidth utilization and traffic patterns, and VoIP quality analysis examining RTP streams for packet loss, latency, or jitter. Analyzer configuration considerations include understanding that mirroring traffic consumes switch resources including buffer memory and internal bandwidth potentially impacting production performance under heavy load, ensuring analysis interfaces have sufficient bandwidth to handle mirrored traffic volumes which can exceed source interface rates when mirroring multiple sources, applying filters judiciously to mirror only relevant traffic reducing resource consumption, and disabling analyzers when not actively needed to free resources. Mirrored traffic arrives at analysis ports with original MAC addresses, VLAN tags (unless stripped), and packet contents enabling complete protocol analysis, though timestamps might differ from original transmission times. This makes A the correct answer for port mirroring functionality enabling traffic capture for analysis.
B is incorrect because VLAN trunking carries multiple VLANs’ traffic across single links using 802.1Q tagging but doesn’t copy traffic for analysis. Trunking is a transport mechanism for VLAN traffic while port mirroring duplicates traffic for monitoring. These serve different purposes with separate configurations.
C is incorrect because link aggregation combines multiple physical interfaces into logical interfaces for bandwidth increase and redundancy but doesn’t mirror traffic for analysis. Aggregation creates single logical links from multiple physical links while mirroring copies traffic to separate monitoring interfaces.
D is incorrect because spanning tree root is the switch elected as root bridge in spanning tree topology providing reference point for shortest path calculations, but doesn’t relate to traffic mirroring. Spanning tree prevents loops while mirroring enables traffic analysis. These are completely separate functionalities.
Question 180:
A network administrator configures VRRP on Juniper routers to provide gateway redundancy. What determines which router becomes the VRRP master?
A) Highest priority value with 255 being default for IP address owner
B) Router with lowest IP address
C) First router configured
D) Random selection among VRRP members
Answer: A
Explanation:
Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol provides default gateway redundancy enabling transparent failover when active gateway fails maintaining network connectivity without requiring host reconfiguration. VRRP creates virtual router with virtual IP address and virtual MAC address shared among group of physical routers. VRRP master election determines which physical router forwards traffic for virtual router based on configuration and operational state. Priority value ranges from 1 to 255 determining master election preference with higher priority router becoming master, default priority being 100 for non-owners, and priority 255 reserved for IP address owner which is router whose physical interface has IP address matching virtual IP address. IP address owner automatically becomes master with highest possible priority ensuring consistency when virtual IP matches interface IP. Preemption determines whether higher priority router reclaims master role after lower priority router has assumed it with preempt enabled causing automatic takeover when higher priority router becomes available, and preempt disabled requiring manual intervention or master failure for role change. Advertisement interval defines how frequently master sends advertisements to backup routers typically 1 second default, and master down interval determines when backup declares master failed typically 3 times advertisement interval. VRRP operation includes master sending periodic advertisements, backups monitoring advertisements, backup promoting to master when advertisements stop, and gratuitous ARP broadcast updating switch MAC tables with new master MAC. VRRP configuration requires unique VRID identifying virtual router instance, virtual IP address for default gateway, priority setting for election control, and optional preemption, authentication, and tracking. Interface tracking modifies priority based on monitored interface status decreasing priority when tracked interface fails enabling automatic failover when upstream connectivity is lost. Load balancing across multiple virtual routers enables utilizing backup router bandwidth by configuring hosts with different virtual IPs and staggering which router is master for each.
B is incorrect because VRRP does not use lowest IP address as election criterion. Priority value determines mastership with higher being preferred. Using lowest IP would be counterintuitive to priority model.
C is incorrect because configuration order does not determine VRRP master. Priority and operational state determine election. First router configured may initially become master by default but higher priority router will preempt if configured appropriately.
D is incorrect because VRRP master election is deterministic not random. Random selection would cause unpredictable failover behavior and inability to design preferred active-backup topology. Priority-based election provides consistent predictable behavior.
