Visit here for our full Microsoft DP-900 exam dumps and practice test questions.
Question 41:
A company needs to build an end-to-end advanced analytics solution that includes raw data ingestion, data transformation, big data processing, machine learning experiments, and enterprise data warehousing. They want all of these capabilities within a single unified workspace that integrates SQL, Spark, pipelines, and data lake storage. Which Azure service best fulfills this requirement?
Answer:
A) Azure Databricks
B) Azure Synapse Analytics
C) Azure Data Factory
D) Azure HDInsight
Answer: B
Explanation:
Azure Synapse Analytics is the correct solution because it provides a unified platform combining data ingestion, transformation, SQL analytics, Spark processing, data warehousing, and orchestration within a single integrated workspace. The scenario describes a company seeking an end-to-end analytics environment that can ingest raw data, store it, transform it, analyze it, and support advanced machine learning—all from one interface. Synapse brings these capabilities together in Synapse Studio. The system supports SQL-based analytical workloads through Synapse Serverless SQL and Synapse Dedicated SQL Pools. It further supports big data and machine learning via Synapse Spark Pools, which run on Apache Spark clusters integrated with Azure Data Lake Storage.
Azure Databricks, option A, is a powerful Spark-based environment suitable for machine learning and big data analytics. However, it does not include a dedicated MPP SQL warehouse engine or integrated pipeline orchestration in the same unified way that Synapse does. Databricks requires additional services like Data Lake, Data Factory, and SQL Database to achieve what Synapse offers under one umbrella.
Azure Data Factory, option C, is primarily an orchestration service for ETL and ELT workloads. Although essential for data integration, it cannot independently process big data workloads or host data warehousing environments. It must be paired with other tools such as Synapse, Databricks, or SQL Database.
Azure HDInsight, option D, offers big data cluster services for Hadoop, Spark, Hive, and Kafka. It is powerful but lacks the unified interface and integrated analytics, SQL, and warehouse experience that Synapse provides. HDInsight requires additional services for warehousing, orchestration, and machine learning.
The scenario’s emphasis on a single unified workspace for SQL, Spark, pipelines, storage, and ML is fully aligned with Synapse Analytics. Synapse Studio centralizes all these components, allowing collaboration across data engineering, data warehousing, data science, and analytics roles. It integrates seamlessly with Azure Data Lake Storage Gen2, enabling ingestion and analytics without moving data. The unified nature makes Synapse the most complete solution for end-to-end enterprise analytics.
Thus, option B is correct.
Question 42:
A retailer wants to optimize reporting performance on historical sales data and support fast aggregations for dashboards. They plan to design a data warehouse using fact and dimension tables. Which modeling technique should they use to support these analytical workloads?
Answer:
A) Star schema modeling
B) Key-value modeling
C) Document-oriented modeling
D) Graph modeling
Answer: A
Explanation:
A star schema is the most appropriate modeling technique for analytical workloads involving historical data and dashboards. The scenario describes a retailer wanting improved reporting performance and fast aggregations. Star schemas arrange data into fact tables containing measurable business events and dimension tables with descriptive attributes. This structure simplifies analytical queries, allows efficient indexing strategies, and supports OLAP-style operations such as roll-up, drill-down, slicing, and dicing.
Key-value modeling, option B, is optimized for simple lookups and high-speed read/write operations but is not suitable for complex querying or analytical aggregations.
Document-oriented modeling, option C, used by document databases such as Cosmos DB’s Core (SQL) API or MongoDB, supports semi-structured JSON formats. However, it is not optimized for analytic queries requiring consistent dimensions and structured aggregations.
Graph modeling, option D, is excellent for relationship-heavy datasets such as social networks or fraud detection graphs. However, it does not serve the needs of fact-dimension relationships and OLAP-style analytics.
Star schemas enhance OLAP performance by minimizing joins, optimizing table structure, and supporting index-based aggregations. BI tools like Power BI, Tableau, and SQL-based warehouses are built to leverage star schemas effectively. They allow separation between descriptive attributes and measurable facts, which aligns with data warehousing best practices.
Therefore, option A is correct.
Question 43:
A global enterprise needs to ensure its operational database can automatically scale throughput based on demand while maintaining low latency for millions of read and write operations. They also require multi-region distribution for high availability. Which database service satisfies these requirements?
Answer:
A) Azure SQL Managed Instance
B) Azure Cosmos DB
C) Azure PostgreSQL
D) Azure Synapse Dedicated Pool
Answer: B
Explanation:
Azure Cosmos DB is purpose-built for globally distributed workloads that require low-latency reads and writes, automatic throughput scaling, and multi-region replication. The scenario describes an operational database supporting millions of operations per second while maintaining global availability. Cosmos DB meets these requirements with features such as turnkey multi-region distribution, automatic failover, elastic scalability, and guaranteed low latency under 10 ms for reads and writes. Cosmos DB’s API flexibility (SQL API, Cassandra API, MongoDB API, Gremlin API, Table API) further supports diverse application needs.
Azure SQL Managed Instance, option A, offers high compatibility with SQL Server but does not support automatic global distribution or low-millisecond latency at the scale described. It is a strong OLTP solution but not ideal for hyperscale operational workloads.
Azure PostgreSQL, option C, provides relational capabilities but does not offer global distribution, multi-master writes, or the kind of elastic scaling described in the scenario.
Azure Synapse Dedicated Pool, option D, is a data warehouse solution optimized for analytical workloads, not operational read-write workloads.
Cosmos DB provides automatic throughput scaling, high-performance SSD-backed storage, and partition-based scaling to support massive ingestion workloads. It also provides consistency model flexibility ranging from strong to eventual consistency. This makes Cosmos DB the correct answer.
Thus, option B is correct.
Question 44:
Your organization needs an automated way to transform large datasets using dataflows, schedule these transformations, and store the results in a data lake for downstream analytics. They prefer a low-code or no-code interface for building transformation logic. Which Azure service should they use?
Answer:
A) Azure Databricks
B) Azure Data Factory Mapping Data Flows
C) Azure Kubernetes Service
D) Azure SQL Database
Answer: B
Explanation:
Azure Data Factory Mapping Data Flows is the correct choice because it provides a low-code/no-code environment for visually designing large-scale data transformation pipelines. The scenario describes the need to automate transformations, schedule them, and output data into a data lake. Mapping Data Flows supports graphical transformations such as joins, filters, aggregations, derived columns, sorting, and data cleansing without requiring traditional coding frameworks like PySpark or SQL.
Azure Databricks, option A, provides robust code-based transformations using Spark but does not offer a low-code interface. It is highly flexible but requires Python, Scala, SQL, or R programming knowledge.
Azure Kubernetes Service, option C, is a container orchestration platform used for scaling containerized applications. It has no native data transformation capabilities.
Azure SQL Database, option D, offers relational storage and SQL capabilities but does not support large-scale distributed transformation pipelines for unstructured or semi-structured datasets.
Data Factory Mapping Data Flows integrates natively with Azure Data Lake Storage, supports triggers for scheduling transformations, and provides scalable data processing through managed Spark runtimes. Data can be integrated, cleansed, enriched, and delivered through automated pipelines without writing code.
Thus, option B is correct.
Question 45:
A technology company needs to diagnose slow-running queries in Azure SQL Database. They want to view historical execution plans, identify performance regressions, monitor wait statistics, and compare older query plans with newer ones to understand performance changes. Which built-in Azure SQL feature provides these capabilities?
Answer:
A) Dynamic Data Masking
B) Query Store
C) Auditing
D) SQL Alerts
Answer: B
Explanation:
Query Store is the Azure SQL feature specifically designed to capture and analyze query execution history, including performance metrics, query plans, and execution trends. The scenario describes a company experiencing slow-running queries and needing visibility into historical patterns, regressions, and execution plans. These needs align perfectly with Query Store’s capabilities. Query Store automatically records each query’s runtime, CPU usage, duration, logical reads, physical reads, query text, execution plan, and wait statistics. By storing this information over time, Query Store helps engineers compare past query plans with current ones, making it easier to diagnose regressions.
Dynamic Data Masking, option A, is used to hide sensitive data from unauthorized users. It has no relevance to query performance analysis.
Auditing, option C, tracks access and security-related events, not query performance issues or execution patterns.
SQL Alerts, option D, notify administrators about specific conditions such as high CPU or long-running jobs but do not provide plan analysis or detailed query diagnostics.
Query Store acts as a performance “flight recorder,” capturing query behavior over time. It is particularly useful when updates or schema changes cause queries to run slowly. Developers can examine previous efficient execution plans and force them to be used again if necessary, restoring performance stability. Query Store’s ability to store multiple execution plans per query and offer plan forcing is invaluable for performance troubleshooting.
Therefore, option B is correct.
Question 46:
Your organization needs a distributed SQL-based analytics engine capable of processing massive tables using MPP, supporting schema-based data warehousing, materialized views, partitioning, indexing, and optimized performance for BI workloads. Which Azure Synapse component is designed for this?
Answer:
A) Synapse Serverless SQL
B) Synapse Dedicated SQL Pool
C) Synapse Spark Pool
D) Synapse Pipelines
Answer: B
Explanation:
Synapse Dedicated SQL Pool is the correct selection because it is optimized for enterprise-scale SQL warehousing workloads using Massively Parallel Processing (MPP). The scenario requires schema-based analytical workloads, materialized views, partitioning, indexing, and BI optimization. These are characteristics of a classical enterprise data warehouse, which Dedicated SQL Pool supports natively.
Synapse Serverless SQL, option A, is designed for on-demand exploration and lightweight analytics, not high-volume structured warehouse workloads.
Synapse Spark Pool, option C, is built for Spark-based big data processing and machine learning, not SQL-optimized warehousing.
Synapse Pipelines, option D, orchestrate data workflows but do not perform SQL-based analytics.
Dedicated SQL Pool distributes data across multiple nodes, enabling parallel processing of large queries. It supports indexing strategies, table distributions, materialized views, workload management, and query optimization techniques essential for BI. This makes option B correct.
Question 47:
A company needs a fully managed Spark environment to perform batch transformations, machine learning, large-scale ETL workloads, and integrate with Azure Data Lake Storage. They prefer a collaborative notebook interface supporting Python, SQL, Scala, and R. Which Azure service should they choose?
Answer:
A) Azure Databricks
B) Azure Synapse Dedicated SQL
C) Azure Data Factory
D) Azure SQL Managed Instance
Answer: A
Explanation:
Azure Databricks is the most suitable service for large-scale data engineering, Spark-based analytics, and collaborative notebook development. The scenario describes the need for a fully managed Spark environment with support for Python, SQL, Scala, and R, as well as deep integration with Azure Data Lake. Databricks meets all these requirements through its optimized Spark runtime, interactive notebooks, MLflow integration, and scalable clusters.
Synapse Dedicated SQL, option B, is a distributed SQL warehouse engine and does not run Spark-based machine learning or batch transformations.
Azure Data Factory, option C, provides low-code ETL but not Spark clusters or machine learning experimentation.
Azure SQL Managed Instance, option D, is a relational database platform lacking Spark functionality.
Databricks provides autoscaling, collaborative notebooks, job scheduling, ML libraries, and high-performance Spark processing. Thus, option A is correct.
Question 48:
A company needs to analyze real-time data from multiple streaming sources to detect anomalies, generate alerts, and store aggregated results for reporting. They prefer a SQL-like interface to process live event streams. Which Azure service should they use?
Answer:
A) Azure Stream Analytics
B) Azure Data Lake
C) Azure SQL Database
D) Azure Migrate
Answer: A
Explanation:
Azure Stream Analytics is the correct choice because it provides real-time stream processing with a SQL-like query interface. The scenario requires anomaly detection, alerting, and aggregation of live streams—all capabilities that Stream Analytics supports. It integrates with Event Hubs, IoT Hub, and other streaming sources. It can output results to databases, dashboards, data lakes, and analytics services.
Azure Data Lake, option B, stores data but does not process real-time streams.
Azure SQL Database, option C, cannot process streaming data in real time.
Azure Migrate, option D, is used for migration, not analytics.
Stream Analytics supports window functions, temporal joins, pattern matching, and built-in anomaly detection models. This makes option A correct.
Question 49:
A global corporation wants to implement a low-latency NoSQL solution offering guaranteed availability, multi-region writes, elastic scaling, and support for JSON document storage. Which Azure service meets these operational requirements?
Answer:
A) Azure Cosmos DB
B) Azure SQL Database
C) Azure Data Lake
D) Azure Synapse Spark
Answer: A
Explanation:
Azure Cosmos DB is designed for low-latency NoSQL workloads requiring multi-region replication, multi-master writes, elastic throughput scaling, and JSON document storage. The scenario describes global, mission-critical workloads with high availability demands—Cosmos DB meets these requirements through SLAs for latency, availability, consistency, and throughput.
Azure SQL Database, option B, is relational and not optimized for globally distributed NoSQL workloads.
Azure Data Lake, option C, stores big data but is unsuitable for low-latency operational queries.
Azure Synapse Spark, option D, is ideal for big data computation but not operational NoSQL workloads.
Cosmos DB supports multiple APIs, including SQL, MongoDB, Cassandra, Gremlin, and Table. It offers tunable consistency models and automatic failover policies. Thus, option A is correct.
Question 50:
A company requires an automated system that periodically moves cold data from hot storage into cheaper tiers, such as from Data Lake hot tier to cool or archive tier, based on rules and retention policies. Which Azure feature provides this automated lifecycle management?
Answer:
A) Azure Blob Lifecycle Management
B) Azure SQL Auditing
C) Azure Event Grid
D) Azure Monitor
Answer: A
Explanation:
Azure Blob Lifecycle Management is the correct solution because it automates tiering and deletion of blob data based on customizable rules. The scenario involves moving cold data to cheaper tiers automatically. Lifecycle Management policies allow organizations to define rules that transition data from hot to cool or archive tiers after a specified number of days, or delete old files when no longer needed.
SQL Auditing, option B, tracks events but does not move data between storage tiers.
Azure Event Grid, option C, handles event routing but does not manage data lifecycle.
Azure Monitor, option D, provides logging and monitoring but does not automate data tier transitions.
Blob Lifecycle Management works with Azure Data Lake Gen2 as well, making it ideal for large-scale cost-optimized storage strategies. Thus, option A is correct.
Question 51:
A financial organization needs to run large-scale analytical queries on structured historical transaction data. They require high concurrency, predictable performance, workload isolation, and the ability to scale compute resources independently from storage. Which Azure service best fulfills this requirement?
Answer:
A) Azure SQL Database
B) Azure Synapse Dedicated SQL Pool
C) Azure Cosmos DB
D) Azure Database for PostgreSQL
Answer: B
Explanation:
Azure Synapse Dedicated SQL Pool is the service that best satisfies the requirements in this scenario because it provides a fully managed MPP data warehousing engine designed for large-scale analytical workloads. The financial organization needs to run heavy analytical queries on structured historical data, which fits very well with an enterprise data warehousing approach. Dedicated SQL Pool enables massive tables to be distributed across multiple nodes, allowing queries to execute in parallel and return results faster than traditional single-node databases.
Azure SQL Database, option A, is optimized for OLTP workloads and not designed to scale horizontally across distributed compute nodes. While SQL Database supports limited data warehousing functions, it cannot match the throughput, concurrency, and MPP architecture of Dedicated SQL Pool.
Azure Cosmos DB, option C, is a globally distributed NoSQL operational database. It is excellent for handling low-latency reads and writes, but not for structured analytical workloads that require complex aggregations, joins, materialized views, or star-schema modeling.
Azure Database for PostgreSQL, option D, is a relational database engine that supports structured data, but it lacks the distributed MPP engine necessary for large-scale analytics. It is not intended to serve as a petabyte-scale warehouse.
Dedicated SQL Pool supports workload isolation using resource classes, meaning large analytical queries cannot negatively impact smaller or more interactive workloads. It also separates compute from storage, allowing independent scaling. During peak reporting periods, compute resources can be scaled up to improve query performance; during off-peak times, compute can be scaled down to reduce costs.
It also supports features needed in financial analytics such as workload management, partitioning, materialized views, columnstore indexes, and data distribution strategies. All these capabilities contribute to high performance and predictable query behavior.
Therefore, option B is correct.
Question 52:
An enterprise needs to implement a secure identity-based authentication system for Azure SQL Database. They want users and applications to authenticate without using passwords, instead relying on tokens and centralized identity management. Which Azure feature should they use?
Answer:
A) SQL Logins
B) Azure Active Directory Authentication
C) Always Encrypted
D) Kerberos Delegation
Answer: B
Explanation:
Azure Active Directory Authentication is the correct choice because it allows Azure SQL Database to integrate with Azure AD, enabling token-based authentication instead of traditional username/password credentials. This directly addresses the requirement for passwordless authentication using a centralized identity management system. Azure AD Authentication ensures that users and applications authenticate securely through OAuth tokens issued by Azure AD. This improves security, supports conditional access, MFA, identity governance, and modern cloud identity practices.
SQL Logins, option A, rely on username and password authentication. This introduces password management overhead and does not provide centralized identity governance.
Always Encrypted, option C, secures data during processing but is unrelated to authentication mechanisms.
Kerberos Delegation, option D, is used in Active Directory environments for delegation of credentials but is not the primary method for Azure SQL authentication in cloud-native applications.
Azure AD Authentication is highly beneficial for enterprises because it enables RBAC, centralized security policies, access reviews, and security compliance. It allows applications to authenticate using managed identities, eliminating the need for storing secrets. This aligns perfectly with modern zero-trust principles, identity-based security frameworks, and cloud-native infrastructure.
Thus, option B is correct.
Question 53:
A manufacturing company wants to analyze terabytes of sensor data stored in Parquet format inside Azure Data Lake. They want to use Spark to perform feature engineering, aggregations, and machine learning tasks. Which Azure service provides the most suitable managed Spark environment for this scenario?
Answer:
A) Azure Databricks
B) Azure SQL Managed Instance
C) Azure Cosmos DB
D) Azure Stream Analytics
Answer: A
Explanation:
Azure Databricks is the ideal solution for this scenario because it provides a fully managed Spark environment optimized for big data analytics and machine learning. The manufacturing company needs to analyze terabytes of sensor data stored in Parquet format. Databricks integrates seamlessly with Azure Data Lake Storage, enabling distributed processing of Parquet files with exceptional performance due to Spark’s columnar optimizations.
Azure SQL Managed Instance, option B, is not designed for big data analytical workloads or distributed processing. It supports relational storage but cannot handle Spark ML tasks or large-scale batch transformations.
Azure Cosmos DB, option C, is designed for low-latency operational workloads, not big data analytics or distributed computation.
Azure Stream Analytics, option D, focuses on real-time streaming analytics. While useful for stream processing, it does not provide machine learning libraries, notebooks, or distributed batch ML capabilities.
Azure Databricks offers collaborative notebooks, MLflow tracking, Spark SQL, Delta Lake versioning, and autoscaling clusters. It supports Python, Scala, SQL, and R. These capabilities are critical for machine learning pipelines, including feature selection, regression, classification, clustering, time series forecasting, and more.
Spark’s parallelism makes it ideal for handling terabytes of data efficiently. Databricks’ managed environment simplifies cluster setup, scaling, dependency management, and notebook collaboration.
Therefore, option A is correct.
Question 54:
A business wants to visualize real-time streaming data from IoT devices on interactive dashboards. They want to process data in motion using SQL-like queries and then send the processed output to Power BI for live dashboard updates. Which Azure service should they choose?
Answer:
A) Azure Data Factory
B) Azure Stream Analytics
C) Azure SQL Database
D) Azure HDInsight
Answer: B
Explanation:
Azure Stream Analytics is the correct solution because it provides real-time stream processing, SQL-like query capabilities, and built-in output connectors to Power BI for live dashboards. The scenario requires transforming data as it arrives from IoT devices, detecting patterns, computing aggregates, and sending results to Power BI in real time. Stream Analytics supports all of these functionalities.
Azure Data Factory, option A, operates primarily in batch mode and cannot perform real-time analytics or direct streaming-to-dashboard operations.
Azure SQL Database, option C, is not designed to process streaming data. It can store results from Stream Analytics but cannot itself process real-time data in motion.
Azure HDInsight, option D, supports streaming frameworks like Spark Streaming or Storm, but is more complex, requires cluster management, and lacks the built-in simplicity and Power BI integration provided by Stream Analytics.
Stream Analytics supports windowing functions, temporal joins, UDFs, and pattern detection, enabling advanced stream analytics logic. It also supports inputs from Event Hubs, IoT Hub, and Kafka, making it ideal for IoT scenarios.
Thus, option B is correct.
Question 55:
A large organization needs to store petabytes of raw data including logs, images, CSV files, video files, and JSON documents. They require hierarchical namespaces, support for distributed analytics engines, cost-effective tiering, and integration with Spark and SQL engines. Which Azure storage service should they choose?
Answer:
A) Azure Blob Storage (Basic Tier Only)
B) Azure Data Lake Storage Gen2
C) Azure SQL Database
D) Azure Table Storage
Answer: B
Explanation:
Azure Data Lake Storage Gen2 is specifically engineered for large-scale analytics workloads involving raw, unstructured, and semi-structured data. The scenario describes storing petabytes of logs, images, videos, JSON files, and CSV files—exactly the type of data commonly held in data lakes. ADLS Gen2 provides hierarchical namespaces, POSIX-style permissions, massive throughput, and seamless integration with distributed analytics engines like Databricks, Synapse Spark, Synapse SQL, HDInsight, and other big data systems.
Azure Blob Storage (option A) supports object storage but does not provide the hierarchical namespace or advanced analytics integration that ADLS Gen2 offers. While Blob Storage underlies ADLS Gen2, ADLS provides enhancements necessary for big data processing at scale.
Azure SQL Database, option C, is intended for structured relational workloads, not raw big data storage.
Azure Table Storage, option D, is a key-value NoSQL store that cannot store heterogeneous large files at scale.
ADLS Gen2 supports tiering (hot, cool, archive), making it extremely cost-effective. It also supports large-scale ingestion pipelines, Delta Lake formats, parquet optimization, and distributed analytics. It forms the backbone of modern data lakehouse architecture.
Thus, option B is correct.
Question 56:
A global logistics company needs a solution to execute large-scale distributed queries across files stored in Azure Data Lake without provisioning or managing any SQL compute resources. They want to pay only for the queries they run and use T-SQL to explore parquet, CSV, and JSON files directly. Which Azure service provides this capability?
Answer:
A) Azure Synapse Serverless SQL Pool
B) Azure Databricks
C) Azure SQL Managed Instance
D) Azure Stream Analytics
Answer: A
Explanation:
Azure Synapse Serverless SQL Pool is the correct solution because it allows organizations to query data directly from Azure Data Lake using T-SQL without provisioning or managing compute resources. This aligns perfectly with the logistics company’s requirement of paying only for the queries executed. Serverless SQL is an on-demand distributed query engine built into Azure Synapse Analytics that is optimized for data exploration, ad-hoc analytics, and lightweight transformation of large datasets stored in formats such as parquet, CSV, and JSON.
Azure Databricks, option B, provides a powerful Spark environment but requires cluster provisioning. Even with job clusters, Databricks is not serverless in the same sense as Synapse Serverless SQL. It also uses Spark APIs rather than pure T-SQL, which does not match the requirement for SQL-based exploration.
Azure SQL Managed Instance, option C, is designed for OLTP workloads and requires full provisioning. It cannot directly query raw parquet or JSON files stored in Data Lake without using external tables configured through PolyBase-like mechanisms, which involve more complexity than serverless SQL.
Azure Stream Analytics, option D, supports SQL-like stream processing for real-time workloads but is not used for querying static files or exploring batch datasets stored in a data lake.
Synapse Serverless SQL Pool automatically scales to match workload demand and charges only for processed data volume, making it extremely cost-efficient for exploratory analytics. It requires no cluster management, no compute planning, and no resource scaling. Users simply run queries, and the system automatically parallelizes execution across distributed compute nodes. It’s ideal for scenarios involving data engineers, analysts, and BI developers who want immediate T-SQL access to data without setting up infrastructure.
Serverless SQL can also serve as an external table engine for Power BI, Synapse Pipelines, and other analytics tools. It supports views, metadata querying, CTAS operations, and integration with data lake security through Azure AD permissions and ACLs. This makes it a flexible and powerful tool for enterprise data exploration.
Thus, option A is correct.
Question 57:
A company wants to build a data ingestion pipeline that automatically loads data from on-premises SQL Server into Azure Data Lake on a scheduled basis. They need a fully managed service with built-in connectors, the ability to schedule pipelines, orchestrate workflows, and perform ETL or ELT operations with minimal code. Which Azure service should they choose?
Answer:
A) Azure Event Hubs
B) Azure Data Factory
C) Azure Data Lake Analytics
D) Azure Cosmos DB
Answer: B
Explanation:
Azure Data Factory is the correct choice because it provides a fully managed cloud-based data integration service with hundreds of built-in connectors for ingesting, transforming, and orchestrating data. The scenario describes a company that needs to create a scheduled ingestion pipeline moving data from on-premises SQL Server into Azure Data Lake. Data Factory’s Integration Runtime allows secure communication between cloud resources and on-premises systems, enabling seamless data extraction and movement.
Azure Event Hubs, option A, handles real-time event ingestion, not scheduled batch ingestion from relational databases.
Azure Data Lake Analytics, option C, provides distributed analytics using U-SQL but does not orchestrate ingestion or connect directly to on-prem systems.
Azure Cosmos DB, option D, is an operational NoSQL database and cannot perform ETL or orchestrate pipelines.
Data Factory supports ETL and ELT workflows, including Mapping Data Flows for no-code transformations and Wrangling Data Flows for PowerQuery-style logic. Pipelines can be triggered based on schedules, events, or manually. It is ideal for creating repeatable, scalable ingestion patterns with minimal development effort.
Thus, option B is correct.
Question 58:
A retail organization requires a globally distributed operational database with configurable consistency levels. They need low-latency read and write operations across multiple continents and automatic failover capabilities. Which Azure database solution meets all these criteria?
Answer:
A) Azure SQL Database
B) Azure Database for PostgreSQL
C) Azure Cosmos DB
D) Azure Synapse SQL
Answer: C
Explanation:
Azure Cosmos DB is the correct option because it is Microsoft’s fully managed, globally distributed NoSQL database designed for extremely low latency, high availability, and massive scalability. Unlike traditional relational databases, Cosmos DB can automatically distribute data across multiple regions, allowing applications to serve users from the closest geographic location with millisecond response times. It supports multiple data models—such as document, key-value, graph, and column-family—giving developers the flexibility to choose the most suitable model for their application. Cosmos DB also provides multi-master replication, meaning applications can read and write data from any region, offering high resilience and fault tolerance. Another key advantage is its ability to scale throughput and storage elastically, adjusting to changing workloads without downtime. The service also offers comprehensive SLAs that cover latency, availability, consistency, and throughput, which is unique among cloud databases.
In contrast, Azure SQL Database and Azure Database for PostgreSQL are fully managed relational database services that excel at structured, transactional workloads but do not offer the same global distribution or low-latency performance characteristics. They are ideal for applications requiring ACID transactions and complex queries but are not optimized for massive-scale NoSQL operations. Azure Synapse SQL, on the other hand, is built for data warehousing and large-scale analytics rather than real-time operational workloads. It is excellent for running analytical queries across large datasets but is not designed for high-speed, globally distributed application data storage. Considering these differences, Cosmos DB stands out as the most suitable choice when applications demand global distribution, multi-model flexibility, automatic scaling, and guaranteed low latency, making option C the correct answer.
Thus, option C is correct.
Question 59:
A data analytics team wants to optimize storage costs in their Azure Data Lake by automatically deleting files that haven’t been accessed for over 180 days. They want a rules-based automated solution that manages data lifecycle without manual intervention. Which Azure feature fulfills this need?
Answer:
A) Azure Monitor
B) Azure Blob Lifecycle Management
C) Azure Enterprise Applications
D) Azure SQL Alerts
Answer: B
Explanation:
Azure Blob Lifecycle Management is the correct option because it provides an automated way to manage the lifecycle of data stored in Azure Blob Storage. This feature allows organizations to optimize storage costs by automatically moving data between access tiers—such as Hot, Cool, and Archive—based on customizable rules and conditions. For example, if certain files have not been accessed for a specified number of days, lifecycle rules can automatically transition them to a cooler or archival tier, significantly reducing storage costs while still retaining the data for compliance or long-term retention. Blob Lifecycle Management can also be used to delete data automatically after a defined retention period, ensuring that unnecessary or expired files do not accumulate and inflate storage expenses. This makes it a powerful tool for managing large volumes of unstructured data efficiently and cost-effectively.
The other options do not focus on automating storage lifecycle or cost optimization for blob data. Azure Monitor is a monitoring service designed to collect and analyze telemetry across Azure resources, helping with performance monitoring and diagnostics but not with storage tiering or automated data management. Azure Enterprise Applications refer to identity and access management integrations within Azure Active Directory, enabling single sign-on and application access control, which is unrelated to storage lifecycle management. Azure SQL Alerts are used to notify administrators about specific conditions or performance metrics related to Azure SQL databases, such as CPU usage or query performance issues, and do not provide any capability for managing blob storage or optimizing its costs. Therefore, Azure Blob Lifecycle Management is the correct answer, as it directly addresses automated blob data tiering, retention, and deletion capabilities.
Thus, option B is correct.
Question 60:
An organization needs to perform real-time complex event processing on data from IoT devices, including filtering, pattern detection, anomaly identification, and triggering downstream actions. They prefer a simple SQL-based query language for defining processing logic. Which Azure service should they use?
Answer:
A) Azure Databricks
B) Azure Data Explorer
C) Azure Stream Analytics
D) Azure Data Factory
Answer: C
Explanation:
Azure Stream Analytics is the correct option because it is specifically designed for real-time data processing and analytics of streaming data from sources such as IoT devices, applications, sensors, logs, and event hubs. It enables organizations to ingest high-volume, continuous data streams and apply real-time transformations, filtering, aggregations, and complex event processing (CEP) using a SQL-like query language. With Stream Analytics, businesses can detect patterns, trigger alerts, identify anomalies, and derive immediate insights with extremely low latency. The service is fully managed, meaning it requires no infrastructure setup, scales automatically based on workload, and integrates seamlessly with Azure Event Hubs, IoT Hub, Synapse, Power BI, and Data Lake Storage. This makes it ideal for scenarios like live dashboards, fraud detection, IoT monitoring, predictive maintenance, and operational intelligence—where data must be analyzed the moment it arrives.
The other options do not serve this purpose. Azure Databricks is a collaborative analytics platform optimized for big data processing and machine learning but is not primarily focused on real-time streaming analytics, even though it can process streams. Azure Data Explorer is excellent for fast exploration and analysis of large volumes of log and telemetry data, but it focuses more on querying and analytics over already-ingested data rather than continuous real-time stream processing. Azure Data Factory is an orchestration and ETL/ELT service for moving and transforming data in scheduled or batch workflows, not for processing real-time streams. Therefore, Azure Stream Analytics is the best choice for real-time event processing and is correctly identified as option C.
