Visit here for our full Amazon AWS Certified Advanced Networking – Specialty ANS-C01 exam dumps and practice test questions.
Question 1:
A company wants to connect multiple VPCs across different AWS regions while ensuring high availability and low latency. Which AWS service combination should they use to achieve this requirement efficiently?
A) VPC Peering across regions
B) AWS Transit Gateway with inter-region peering
C) AWS Direct Connect with VPN connections
D) Classic VPN connections between VPCs
Answer: B
Explanation:
When a company needs to connect multiple VPCs across different regions while maintaining high availability and low latency, the optimal solution is using AWS Transit Gateway (TGW) with inter-region peering. VPC peering across regions (A) is supported but is limited in scalability, as peering connections must be created individually between each VPC pair. This can lead to complex management overhead as the number of VPCs increases. AWS Transit Gateway with inter-region peering (B) provides a hub-and-spoke architecture, which centralizes routing, reduces management complexity, and supports thousands of VPC attachments. This method also enables transitive routing, allowing VPCs to communicate with each other without creating multiple direct peering connections. AWS Direct Connect with VPN connections (C) provides a dedicated network link from on-premises to AWS but is not inherently designed for inter-region VPC connectivity and is primarily for hybrid cloud connectivity. Classic VPN connections between VPCs (D) are secure but less efficient for large-scale networks because they are point-to-point, and scaling them requires more configuration effort. Using Transit Gateway with inter-region peering also enhances redundancy, as it can span multiple Availability Zones, providing resilience against individual AZ failures. Additionally, it supports route propagation and dynamic route updates, reducing manual intervention. Overall, the combination of AWS Transit Gateway and inter-region peering is the most efficient, scalable, and operationally manageable solution for multi-region, multi-VPC connectivity.
Question 2:
A network engineer wants to implement a solution that ensures encrypted communication between EC2 instances in different VPCs across regions. Which approach ensures the highest level of encryption while maintaining performance?
A) Configure IPsec VPN tunnels between VPCs
B) Use AWS Transit Gateway with default routing
C) Enable VPC Peering and enforce encryption at the application layer
D) Use AWS PrivateLink for inter-VPC communication
Answer: C
Explanation:
For encrypted communication between EC2 instances in different VPCs across regions, the best approach is to enable VPC Peering (C) while enforcing encryption at the application layer, such as using TLS/SSL. IPsec VPN tunnels (A) provide encryption at the network layer but can introduce additional latency and overhead, especially for high-throughput traffic. VPN connections also require careful management of keys, IP addressing, and scaling configurations. AWS Transit Gateway with default routing (B) supports routing traffic across VPCs but does not inherently provide encryption unless combined with VPN or TLS, and adding these layers may impact performance. AWS PrivateLink (D) is optimized for private access to services within or across VPCs, but it is typically used for service-to-service communication, not general EC2-to-EC2 traffic. Implementing VPC Peering with application-level encryption ensures that all data transmitted between EC2 instances is encrypted end-to-end, providing the highest security without compromising performance. TLS encryption can be optimized and managed per application, allowing the use of strong cipher suites and minimizing overhead. Furthermore, VPC Peering provides low-latency, high-bandwidth communication, making it suitable for real-time applications while maintaining secure data transfer. By combining VPC Peering with application-layer encryption, organizations can achieve both security and operational efficiency across regions.
Question 3:
An enterprise needs to monitor network traffic across multiple VPCs in a centralized way while capturing both flow and packet-level data. Which AWS service combination should the engineer use to meet this requirement?
A) Enable VPC Flow Logs for all VPCs and send them to CloudWatch
B) Deploy AWS Traffic Mirroring on selected ENIs and aggregate in S3
C) Use AWS Transit Gateway Network Manager with VPC Flow Logs and Traffic Mirroring
D) Rely solely on CloudTrail logs for monitoring inter-VPC traffic
Answer: C
Explanation:
Centralized monitoring of network traffic across multiple VPCs requires a combination of flow-level monitoring and packet-level visibility. VPC Flow Logs (A) capture metadata about traffic flows but do not provide full packet-level details, which may limit deep analysis or troubleshooting. AWS Traffic Mirroring (B) captures packet-level data by mirroring traffic from EC2 instances or ENIs, but deploying it without central coordination across multiple VPCs can be operationally complex. CloudTrail logs (D) focus on API activity and do not provide actual network traffic data, so relying solely on CloudTrail is insufficient. The most comprehensive approach is AWS Transit Gateway Network Manager (C), combined with VPC Flow Logs and Traffic Mirroring. Transit Gateway Network Manager enables centralized management and monitoring of complex multi-VPC architectures, including global networks spanning multiple regions. By using VPC Flow Logs, engineers can capture metadata for traffic analytics, while Traffic Mirroring provides deep packet-level visibility for troubleshooting, security analysis, and compliance audits. This integrated approach allows engineers to correlate traffic patterns, detect anomalies, and visualize inter-VPC network activity in a unified view. The combination ensures scalable monitoring without sacrificing granularity or operational efficiency. Additionally, sending mirrored traffic to a central monitoring solution, such as an S3 bucket or analytics tool, enables further inspection using machine learning or SIEM tools, providing a holistic security posture.
Question 4:
A company wants to optimize the cost of transferring data between multiple VPCs within the same AWS region. Which solution provides the most cost-efficient high-performance connectivity?
A) Use inter-VPC VPN connections
B) Configure VPC Peering for all VPC pairs
C) Implement AWS Transit Gateway and aggregate VPC attachments
D) Route traffic through the public internet with NAT gateways
Answer: C
Explanation:
For optimizing cost and performance for intra-region VPC traffic, AWS Transit Gateway (C) is the most cost-effective and scalable solution. Inter-VPC VPN connections (A) introduce per-VPN hourly costs and data transfer charges, making them expensive for multiple VPCs. VPC Peering for all VPC pairs (B) requires establishing individual peering connections for each VPC, which becomes unmanageable and can result in higher total data transfer costs as each pair communicates directly. Routing traffic through the public internet with NAT gateways (D) adds unnecessary latency and data transfer charges, making it unsuitable for high-performance workloads. Using AWS Transit Gateway allows multiple VPCs to connect through a single hub, simplifying routing, reducing the number of connections, and minimizing total data transfer costs. Transit Gateway also supports high-bandwidth connections, enabling low-latency communication across VPCs. With route propagation, updates in one VPC automatically reflect in others, eliminating manual updates. Furthermore, by centralizing the routing architecture, Transit Gateway reduces operational complexity and supports additional services like AWS Direct Connect integration for hybrid environments. Overall, AWS Transit Gateway ensures efficient scaling, predictable costs, and high performance for intra-region VPC traffic.
Question 5:
A network architect is designing a hybrid cloud architecture where on-premises data centers need secure, highly available connectivity to multiple AWS regions. Which AWS service combination should they implement?
A) Single AWS Direct Connect link per region with VPN failover
B) AWS Direct Connect with AWS Transit Gateway and VPN backup
C) Individual VPN connections from on-premises to each VPC
D) Use public internet connectivity with SSL tunnels to each VPC
Answer: B
Explanation:
For a hybrid cloud architecture that requires secure, highly available connectivity to multiple AWS regions, the recommended approach is AWS Direct Connect integrated with AWS Transit Gateway and VPN backup (B). Single Direct Connect links per region (A) provide a private connection but lack redundancy if a link fails. Relying on individual VPN connections (C) to each VPC is operationally intensive and difficult to scale. Using public internet connectivity (D) is inherently less secure and suffers from unpredictable latency and lower SLA guarantees. Direct Connect provides dedicated, high-bandwidth connectivity between on-premises data centers and AWS, ensuring low latency and predictable performance. Integrating Transit Gateway enables centralized routing across multiple VPCs and regions, simplifying management and providing a hub-and-spoke architecture. A VPN backup ensures continuity of service if the Direct Connect link experiences outages, maintaining business-critical operations. Additionally, Transit Gateway supports inter-region peering, enabling multi-region hybrid architectures while maintaining simplicity and scalability. By combining these services, organizations achieve a resilient, high-performance, and secure hybrid cloud network that is both cost-effective and operationally manageable.
Question 6
A company wants to connect its on-premises network to multiple AWS VPCs across different regions while maintaining high availability and low latency. Which AWS service or architecture should they implement to achieve this goal efficiently?
A) AWS Direct Connect with a single VPC peering
B) AWS Site-to-Site VPN with a hub-and-spoke topology
C) AWS Transit Gateway with inter-region peering
D) AWS VPC Peering between all VPCs
Answer: C
Explanation:
For enterprises requiring high performance, scalable, and resilient interconnectivity between multiple VPCs in different AWS regions, AWS Transit Gateway with inter-region peering is the most suitable solution. AWS Transit Gateway acts as a central hub, connecting multiple VPCs, on-premises networks, and even VPNs, simplifying complex network topologies. Using inter-region peering ensures that data can traverse AWS’s backbone network with low latency, offering better performance compared to multiple individual VPC peering connections, which are region-specific and cannot span across regions.
Option A), AWS Direct Connect with a single VPC peering, provides a dedicated connection to AWS, reducing latency and providing stable bandwidth. However, this approach does not scale well for multi-region architectures because Direct Connect connections are region-specific and require additional configuration and multiple physical connections to access multiple VPCs in different regions.
Option B), AWS Site-to-Site VPN with a hub-and-spoke topology, can provide secure connectivity between on-premises networks and AWS, but it is inherently limited in bandwidth and performance compared to Direct Connect or Transit Gateway. VPN connections are also more susceptible to latency and jitter due to traversing the public internet, making them less ideal for latency-sensitive workloads.
Option D), VPC peering between all VPCs, is possible for VPC-to-VPC communication within the same region, but it introduces management complexity in multi-region scenarios. Peering connections must be manually configured for every VPC pair, leading to a mesh-like architecture that is difficult to maintain, prone to misconfigurations, and doesn’t natively support transitive routing, requiring additional configurations.
AWS Transit Gateway solves these problems by centralizing routing policies, simplifying connectivity, reducing the number of required peering connections, and supporting both intra-region and inter-region communication. It also supports route propagation and route filtering, which allows enterprises to enforce network segmentation while maintaining high availability. By combining Transit Gateway with inter-region peering, organizations can achieve a global network design that is highly available, scalable, and performant while minimizing operational complexity and management overhead.
Question 7
A company is designing a hybrid cloud architecture and requires dynamic routing between their on-premises network and AWS. The solution must automatically adapt to network failures or changes. Which AWS service or protocol is most appropriate for this scenario?
A) Static routes with AWS Direct Connect
B) Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) over AWS Direct Connect or VPN
C) AWS VPC Peering with manual route configuration
D) AWS Global Accelerator
Answer: B
Explanation:
Dynamic routing is essential in hybrid cloud architectures to ensure network resiliency and automatic adaptation to changes or failures. Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) is a standardized exterior gateway protocol that dynamically exchanges routing information between autonomous systems, allowing the on-premises network and AWS to automatically adjust routing when a link fails or a new path becomes available. BGP can be used over AWS Direct Connect or AWS Site-to-Site VPN, providing flexibility in connectivity and automatic failover mechanisms.
Option A), using static routes with AWS Direct Connect, can provide a stable connection for specific workloads, but static routes are inflexible. They do not automatically adjust to network changes or failures, requiring manual intervention to update routes if the topology changes, which can introduce downtime and operational overhead.
Option C), VPC peering with manual route configuration, is suitable for communication between VPCs, but it lacks the ability to adapt dynamically to failures or network changes. Peering routes must be updated manually, and VPC peering does not support transitive routing natively, making it less suitable for hybrid cloud setups that require dynamic failover capabilities.
Option D), AWS Global Accelerator, is primarily designed to optimize network performance for internet-facing applications by routing traffic through AWS’s global edge locations. While it improves performance and availability, it does not provide dynamic routing between on-premises networks and AWS.
Implementing BGP over Direct Connect or VPN ensures that route advertisements between AWS and on-premises networks are automatically adjusted, enabling resilient, adaptive hybrid cloud architectures. BGP supports multiple paths, load balancing, and failover, which is crucial for enterprises that require continuous connectivity. Additionally, AWS supports BGP attributes such as AS path prepending, local preference, and community tags, allowing granular control over routing policies. This ensures that network traffic is optimally directed, reduces latency, and avoids congestion while maintaining security and compliance with organizational network policies.
Question 8
A company has multiple AWS accounts and VPCs in the same region. They want to centralize network security and reduce the complexity of managing security groups and NACLs for inter-VPC communication. Which AWS service provides the most efficient solution?
A) AWS Security Hub
B) AWS Network Firewall deployed in each VPC
C) AWS Transit Gateway with centralized firewall policies
D) VPC Peering with manual NACL configuration
Answer: C
Explanation:
For organizations managing multiple VPCs and AWS accounts in the same region, centralizing network security is critical to reduce operational complexity, improve compliance, and enforce consistent security policies. AWS Transit Gateway with centralized firewall policies allows VPCs to connect through a central hub, where traffic inspection, filtering, and monitoring can be applied consistently across all connected VPCs. This architecture minimizes the need for repetitive NACLs or security group configurations across multiple VPCs, simplifying policy enforcement and reducing administrative overhead.
Option A), AWS Security Hub, is an excellent tool for security posture management and compliance monitoring, but it does not directly enforce network-level traffic control between VPCs. Security Hub aggregates findings from other AWS security services but does not provide routing or firewall capabilities.
Option B), deploying AWS Network Firewall in each VPC, provides granular traffic filtering and intrusion prevention, but it introduces management complexity because each firewall must be configured and maintained individually. For enterprises with dozens of VPCs, this can become error-prone and challenging to scale.
Option D), VPC Peering with manual NACL configuration, is viable for small deployments but quickly becomes unwieldy as the number of VPCs grows. Manual route management and access control lists create administrative overhead, increase the risk of misconfigurations, and do not scale efficiently.
AWS Transit Gateway allows organizations to implement centralized routing and security inspection, using features such as route tables, propagation, and integration with AWS Network Firewall. Centralized firewall deployment enables uniform enforcement of rules such as allow/deny lists, intrusion detection, and inspection of east-west traffic between VPCs. By centralizing network security, enterprises can improve visibility, simplify compliance reporting, reduce latency associated with multiple firewall hops, and enable seamless inter-VPC communication without individually configuring each VPC.
Question 9
A company needs to improve performance and reduce latency for global users accessing a web application hosted in AWS. They want to route user requests to the nearest AWS edge location automatically. Which AWS service is best suited for this requirement?
A) AWS CloudFront
B) AWS Global Accelerator
C) AWS Route 53 latency-based routing
D) AWS Elastic Load Balancer
Answer: B
Explanation:
To optimize performance and reduce latency for global users, AWS Global Accelerator is the most suitable solution. Global Accelerator provides static anycast IP addresses that automatically route user traffic to the optimal AWS edge location or regional endpoint. By using AWS’s global network, it ensures lower latency, faster performance, and automatic failover if an endpoint becomes unavailable. Unlike traditional DNS-based solutions, Global Accelerator optimizes the network path dynamically, reducing round-trip times and avoiding public internet congestion.
Option A), AWS CloudFront, is primarily a content delivery network (CDN) designed to cache static and dynamic content close to users. While it improves performance for web content delivery, it does not optimize routing for non-cacheable content or TCP/UDP traffic in the same way Global Accelerator does.
Option C), Route 53 latency-based routing, directs users to endpoints based on latency measurements but relies on DNS, which can introduce caching delays and does not provide automatic network-level failover. DNS-based solutions are also slower to propagate in case of endpoint failures.
Option D), Elastic Load Balancer (ELB), distributes traffic within a region among multiple EC2 instances or containers. While it provides high availability at a regional level, it does not optimize global routing or minimize latency for geographically distributed users.
AWS Global Accelerator works by leveraging AWS edge locations and the AWS global network backbone. It continuously monitors the health of endpoints and automatically directs traffic away from unhealthy endpoints. Additionally, it supports TCP and UDP applications, making it versatile for both web and non-web applications. By reducing the number of network hops, avoiding congested internet paths, and using static IPs for endpoints, Global Accelerator significantly enhances application performance, resilience, and user experience for a worldwide audience.
Question 10
An enterprise requires encryption and traffic inspection between multiple VPCs while maintaining centralized monitoring and compliance enforcement. Which solution provides both encrypted traffic and scalable inspection without configuring individual VPC firewalls?
A) AWS VPC Peering with TLS encryption
B) AWS Transit Gateway with AWS Network Firewall integration
C) AWS Direct Connect with IPsec tunnels
D) AWS Site-to-Site VPN between each VPC pair
Answer: B
Explanation:
For enterprises needing encryption, traffic inspection, and centralized compliance enforcement across multiple VPCs, AWS Transit Gateway integrated with AWS Network Firewall is the most effective solution. Transit Gateway centralizes connectivity, enabling a hub-and-spoke model for inter-VPC traffic. By integrating Network Firewall, all traffic traversing the Transit Gateway can be inspected and filtered according to enterprise policies without requiring per-VPC firewall deployment, reducing administrative complexity while maintaining security standards.
Option A), VPC Peering with TLS encryption, provides secure communication at the application layer but does not allow centralized inspection, monitoring, or enforcement of network security policies. Each VPC would need its own inspection and monitoring setup, which is operationally expensive and hard to scale.
Option C), Direct Connect with IPsec tunnels, provides private connectivity and encryption between on-premises and AWS, but it is designed for hybrid cloud scenarios, not for inter-VPC communication at scale. Managing multiple IPsec tunnels between VPCs would become cumbersome and difficult to monitor centrally.
Option D), Site-to-Site VPN between each VPC pair, offers encrypted connectivity, but the scalability is limited. Each VPN requires separate configuration, monitoring, and maintenance, making it unsuitable for organizations with a large number of VPCs or dynamic network changes.
By combining Transit Gateway with AWS Network Firewall, organizations achieve scalable encryption and inspection capabilities. Network Firewall allows filtering based on IP, port, protocol, and application-level rules. Additionally, centralized monitoring, logging, and compliance auditing are easier to implement, since all traffic can be directed through a single inspection point. This approach provides scalability, security, operational efficiency, and compliance assurance, making it ideal for multi-VPC enterprise architectures in AWS.
Question 11
A company has multiple AWS accounts and VPCs across several regions. They want to enforce centralized routing, simplify inter-VPC communication, and ensure that sensitive traffic is monitored for compliance. Which solution offers the best balance of scalability, security, and operational efficiency?
A) AWS VPC Peering between all VPCs with custom NACLs
B) AWS Transit Gateway with centralized inspection and route tables
C) AWS Direct Connect with multiple static routes to each VPC
D) AWS Site-to-Site VPN connections between all regions
Answer: B
Explanation:
When managing multiple AWS accounts and VPCs across regions, achieving centralized routing, monitoring, and compliance enforcement is challenging without a central network architecture. AWS Transit Gateway with centralized inspection and route tables provides the most effective solution for this scenario. Transit Gateway acts as a hub that connects all VPCs, VPNs, and on-premises networks while centralizing routing policies. With centralized inspection, it allows traffic to be analyzed and filtered for security and compliance purposes before reaching the destination, reducing the risk of misconfigurations and exposure.
Option A), VPC peering between all VPCs with custom NACLs, may initially seem viable, but as the number of VPCs grows, this mesh network becomes increasingly complex and difficult to maintain. VPC peering does not support transitive routing natively, meaning each VPC pair must be configured individually. This approach significantly increases operational overhead, complicates compliance monitoring, and lacks a single point for enforcing security inspection.
Option C), AWS Direct Connect with multiple static routes to each VPC, provides dedicated private connectivity, which improves performance and reduces latency. However, static routes do not scale efficiently for multi-region, multi-VPC environments. Any network change requires manual reconfiguration, making it error-prone and time-consuming to manage. Direct Connect also does not provide inherent traffic inspection capabilities for centralized security or compliance enforcement.
Option D), Site-to-Site VPN connections between all regions, provides encrypted connectivity but suffers from performance limitations and does not offer a centralized point for monitoring or inspecting traffic. Maintaining multiple VPN connections across regions introduces operational complexity and does not scale efficiently.
By leveraging AWS Transit Gateway, organizations can create a hub-and-spoke model that simplifies connectivity between VPCs and regions. Centralized route tables allow administrators to define which VPCs or networks can communicate, while integration with AWS Network Firewall or traffic inspection appliances ensures sensitive data is monitored for compliance. This design reduces the risk of misconfigurations, centralizes policy enforcement, and improves operational efficiency. Enterprises also benefit from scalable and resilient networking because Transit Gateway supports inter-region peering and dynamic routing protocols like BGP for on-premises integration, making it ideal for global architectures requiring security, performance, and manageability.
Question 12
An organization wants to reduce internet exposure for its applications hosted in AWS while maintaining high availability and secure access from multiple geographic locations. Which architecture provides optimal performance, security, and global reach?
A) AWS CloudFront distribution in front of public-facing EC2 instances
B) AWS Global Accelerator with private VPC endpoints and Transit Gateway
C) AWS Elastic Load Balancer with NACLs configured for public IP ranges
D) AWS Direct Connect with static routing to public endpoints
Answer: B
Explanation:
For organizations seeking to reduce internet exposure while maintaining high availability and secure access from multiple regions, AWS Global Accelerator integrated with private VPC endpoints and Transit Gateway provides the best solution. Global Accelerator uses the AWS global network to route user traffic to the nearest edge location, significantly reducing latency and improving performance. By connecting traffic through private VPC endpoints via Transit Gateway, organizations can restrict direct internet access to their applications, enhancing security while maintaining global reach.
Option A), CloudFront distribution in front of public-facing EC2 instances, provides content caching and performance optimization but exposes endpoints to the public internet. While CloudFront can enforce HTTPS, it does not inherently prevent unauthorized access to the underlying VPC. Additionally, dynamic, non-cacheable application traffic may not benefit fully from CloudFront acceleration.
Option C), ELB with NACLs configured for public IP ranges, allows some level of access restriction, but it still exposes endpoints to the public internet. Configuring NACLs for multiple regions and IP ranges introduces complexity and operational overhead. ELBs also lack the global optimization that Global Accelerator provides, resulting in higher latency for distant users.
Option D), Direct Connect with static routing to public endpoints, provides private connectivity to AWS, but it does not address global access for geographically distributed users. Direct Connect connections are region-specific, and multiple connections are required for multi-region access, increasing complexity and cost.
By combining AWS Global Accelerator with private VPC endpoints and Transit Gateway, organizations achieve secure, low-latency access for users worldwide. Transit Gateway centralizes routing within the VPC, providing secure east-west communication without exposing resources to the public internet. Traffic can be inspected and logged centrally using AWS Network Firewall, VPC flow logs, or other security appliances, ensuring compliance. This architecture is scalable, resilient, and operationally efficient, offering centralized control over security and routing while leveraging AWS’s global network to reduce latency and improve user experience.
Question 13
A company needs to implement a highly available, scalable solution for connecting multiple on-premises data centers to AWS. They want to minimize latency, ensure failover, and allow dynamic routing between sites and VPCs. Which approach is most suitable?
A) Single AWS Direct Connect connection per data center with static routes
B) AWS Site-to-Site VPN with failover configuration
C) AWS Transit Gateway with multiple Direct Connect connections and BGP
D) VPC Peering with VPN tunnels between each VPC and data center
Answer: C
Explanation:
When designing a highly available, low-latency, and dynamically routed hybrid cloud architecture, AWS Transit Gateway with multiple Direct Connect connections and BGP provides the most robust solution. Transit Gateway centralizes routing between VPCs and on-premises networks, reducing operational complexity compared to configuring multiple point-to-point VPNs or VPC peering connections. Using multiple Direct Connect links ensures redundancy and high bandwidth, while BGP enables dynamic route propagation, allowing automatic failover if one link fails.
Option A), a single Direct Connect connection per data center with static routes, limits redundancy. If the link fails, connectivity is lost until manual intervention restores routing. Static routes also cannot adapt to changing network conditions, which can cause downtime or suboptimal routing.
Option B), Site-to-Site VPN with failover configuration, provides encrypted connectivity and automatic failover, but VPNs rely on the public internet, which is less reliable and has higher latency than Direct Connect. VPNs are suitable as a backup to Direct Connect but are not ideal for primary, high-throughput connections.
Option D), VPC peering with VPN tunnels between each VPC and data center, introduces complexity and does not scale well. Each VPC would require separate VPN tunnels, creating a mesh of connections that are difficult to manage and monitor. Peering does not support transitive routing natively, further complicating the design.
By combining AWS Transit Gateway with multiple Direct Connect connections, enterprises achieve a centralized, scalable hub that supports multi-region and multi-VPC connectivity. BGP provides dynamic route updates, enabling rapid failover and optimal path selection, while Transit Gateway simplifies policy enforcement, monitoring, and logging. Organizations can implement network segmentation, traffic inspection, and security policies centrally, ensuring high performance, availability, and compliance in hybrid cloud architectures.
Question 14
A company wants to monitor and analyze network traffic between multiple VPCs for security and performance insights. They also want to enforce policy-based traffic filtering without modifying individual VPC configurations. Which AWS solution is most appropriate?
A) AWS VPC Flow Logs with individual EC2 firewall rules
B) AWS Transit Gateway with AWS Network Firewall and logging enabled
C) AWS CloudWatch metrics on each VPC subnet
D) AWS Route 53 logging with latency-based routing
Answer: B
Explanation:
For centralized monitoring, policy enforcement, and traffic inspection between multiple VPCs without modifying individual VPC configurations, AWS Transit Gateway integrated with AWS Network Firewall and logging provides the most effective solution. Transit Gateway consolidates routing between VPCs into a hub-and-spoke architecture, enabling traffic to traverse a single centralized point where Network Firewall can inspect and filter traffic based on predefined rules. Logging can be enabled to track network flows for auditing, compliance, and performance monitoring.
Option A), VPC Flow Logs combined with EC2 firewall rules, provides some visibility and local traffic control. However, EC2 firewall rules must be managed individually for each instance, leading to administrative complexity and potential inconsistencies. VPC Flow Logs offer monitoring but no active traffic filtering or policy enforcement.
Option C), CloudWatch metrics on each subnet, gives high-level performance monitoring but lacks the granularity needed for network security inspection or centralized traffic filtering. Metrics do not enforce security policies and are insufficient for compliance reporting.
Option D), Route 53 logging with latency-based routing, focuses on DNS resolution and does not provide insight into inter-VPC traffic flows or enable traffic filtering. It is unsuitable for monitoring network traffic or enforcing centralized security policies.
By using Transit Gateway with Network Firewall, organizations can define policy-based traffic filtering at the hub level, eliminating the need to configure individual firewalls for each VPC. Centralized logging enables comprehensive auditing and monitoring of east-west traffic, providing insights into performance, potential threats, and compliance violations. This approach ensures operational efficiency, scalable security enforcement, and simplified network management across complex multi-VPC and multi-account environments.
Question 15
An enterprise needs to enable secure, low-latency communication between AWS VPCs in different regions for latency-sensitive applications. They also want automatic failover in case of a regional outage. Which AWS service and configuration meet these requirements most effectively?
A) VPC Peering with manual route propagation between regions
B) AWS Transit Gateway with inter-region peering and dynamic routing
C) Site-to-Site VPN between each regional VPC with static routes
D) AWS Direct Connect to each regional VPC with BGP
Answer: B
Explanation:
For multi-region VPC communication with low latency, secure connections, and automatic failover, AWS Transit Gateway with inter-region peering and dynamic routing is the optimal solution. Transit Gateway provides a centralized hub for connecting multiple VPCs, while inter-region peering enables traffic to traverse the AWS global backbone rather than the public internet, reducing latency and increasing reliability. Dynamic routing, supported via BGP, ensures automatic adaptation to network changes or regional failures, allowing seamless failover without manual intervention.
Option A), VPC Peering with manual route propagation, does not scale well for multiple VPCs across regions and lacks transitive routing. Manual route updates increase operational overhead and risk downtime during regional failover.
Option C), Site-to-Site VPN between each regional VPC with static routes, provides encrypted connectivity but relies on the public internet, which introduces higher latency and potential instability. Managing multiple VPNs with static routes is complex and does not provide automatic failover capabilities.
Option D), Direct Connect to each regional VPC with BGP, offers low-latency private connectivity but requires multiple physical connections for each region. This increases cost, complexity, and does not provide seamless inter-VPC connectivity without additional routing configurations.
By combining Transit Gateway with inter-region peering, organizations can create a global network topology that is scalable, highly available, and secure. BGP ensures dynamic routing and failover, automatically redirecting traffic in case of regional outages. Centralized route tables simplify management, while Transit Gateway supports integration with AWS Network Firewall for inspection, logging, and compliance. This architecture balances security, performance, operational simplicity, and resilience, making it ideal for latency-sensitive, multi-region applications in AWS.
Question 16
A global enterprise is designing a hybrid cloud network that spans multiple AWS regions and on-premises data centers. They want to enforce centralized security policies, optimize traffic routing, and reduce latency for inter-region and on-premises communication. Which architecture achieves these goals most efficiently?
A) Deploy VPC Peering in each region and configure NACLs for security enforcement
B) Implement AWS Transit Gateway with inter-region peering, centralized route tables, and Network Firewall
C) Use Site-to-Site VPN connections between all regions and data centers with static routes
D) Connect all VPCs to AWS Direct Connect with individual routing tables per connection
Answer: B
Explanation:
Designing a hybrid cloud network that spans multiple regions and on-premises data centers requires a solution that combines centralized management, robust security enforcement, low-latency routing, and high scalability. AWS Transit Gateway with inter-region peering, centralized route tables, and Network Firewall provides the most effective architecture for this scenario. Transit Gateway enables the creation of a hub-and-spoke topology where all VPCs and on-premises connections converge at a centralized hub. This allows for simplified routing management, as administrators can define routing policies at a single point rather than maintaining individual configurations for each VPC and connection.
Inter-region peering through Transit Gateway ensures that traffic between AWS regions flows over the AWS global backbone rather than the public internet. This minimizes latency and improves reliability. Centralized route tables allow organizations to control which VPCs and on-premises networks can communicate while enforcing consistent policies across the environment. Integrating AWS Network Firewall at the Transit Gateway hub enables policy-based traffic inspection, filtering, and logging without requiring modification of individual VPC configurations, providing a scalable and secure solution.
Option A), deploying VPC Peering in each region with NACLs, becomes operationally complex as the number of VPCs grows. Peering does not support transitive routing natively, which means each VPC pair requires a separate peering connection and route configuration. This leads to an unmanageable mesh network, increases administrative overhead, and introduces potential security gaps.
Option C), using Site-to-Site VPN connections with static routes, provides secure connectivity but relies on the public internet, which can be less reliable and introduce higher latency. Static routing also requires manual updates for every change, which reduces flexibility and scalability.
Option D), connecting all VPCs to Direct Connect with individual routing tables, improves performance and private connectivity but does not centralize routing or policy enforcement. Each Direct Connect connection requires its own routing configuration, which is difficult to maintain in a multi-region, multi-VPC environment.
By implementing Transit Gateway with inter-region peering, enterprises achieve centralized security, simplified operations, high availability, and low latency across hybrid cloud environments. Centralized route tables, traffic inspection with Network Firewall, and integration with on-premises BGP-enabled routers provide a unified, manageable, and secure network architecture for global enterprise operations.
Question 17
A financial services company is deploying a latency-sensitive trading application across multiple AWS regions. They need secure, highly available connectivity between regions and want automatic failover if one region becomes unavailable. Which AWS solution provides the best combination of performance, resiliency, and security?
A) VPC Peering with manual route updates for failover
B) AWS Transit Gateway with inter-region peering and dynamic BGP routing
C) Site-to-Site VPN between regional VPCs with static routing
D) AWS Direct Connect to each regional VPC without Transit Gateway
Answer: B
Explanation:
For latency-sensitive applications such as trading platforms, organizations need solutions that minimize communication delays, ensure high availability, and provide centralized control. AWS Transit Gateway with inter-region peering and dynamic BGP routing delivers the optimal architecture for these requirements. Transit Gateway serves as a centralized hub, allowing multiple VPCs across regions to communicate through a single managed gateway. Inter-region peering ensures traffic between VPCs uses AWS’s global backbone rather than public internet routes, reducing latency and increasing throughput.
Dynamic routing through BGP allows routes to adapt automatically in the event of regional outages, ensuring automatic failover without manual intervention. Centralized routing tables simplify management, enabling the company to define which VPCs can communicate and enforce consistent policies across regions. For additional security, Network Firewall or other inspection appliances can be deployed at the Transit Gateway hub, ensuring that sensitive financial data is protected in transit.
Option A), VPC Peering with manual route updates, requires each VPC pair to be connected individually, which does not scale well and introduces latency during failover because routes must be manually modified. Peering also lacks centralized monitoring or inspection capabilities.
Option C), Site-to-Site VPN connections with static routing, relies on public internet connectivity, which is susceptible to variable latency and throughput limitations. Static routing increases administrative burden and slows failover response, which is unacceptable for trading applications.
Option D), Direct Connect to each regional VPC without Transit Gateway, provides low-latency private connectivity but lacks centralized routing and failover management. Separate Direct Connect connections for multiple regions become operationally complex and costly.
By using Transit Gateway with inter-region peering and BGP, organizations gain a global, scalable, secure, and resilient architecture. Traffic is routed efficiently across regions, automatic failover occurs seamlessly in case of outages, and centralized control ensures compliance and policy enforcement. This architecture is ideal for latency-sensitive applications that demand high availability and predictable performance at a global scale.
Question 18
A multinational corporation needs to implement a centralized logging and monitoring solution for all VPCs, including cross-account and cross-region environments. They want to detect suspicious network activity and optimize routing without modifying individual VPC architectures. Which AWS design is best suited for this requirement?
A) Enable VPC Flow Logs on each VPC and send logs to CloudWatch manually
B) Deploy AWS Transit Gateway with Network Firewall, centralized logging, and CloudWatch integration
C) Use individual security appliances in each VPC with local logging
D) Configure Route 53 logging for all regions and VPCs
Answer: B
Explanation:
Centralized logging, monitoring, and traffic inspection for multi-account and multi-region AWS environments are complex tasks, particularly when organizations want to avoid modifying individual VPC configurations. AWS Transit Gateway combined with Network Firewall, centralized logging, and CloudWatch integration provides a scalable, efficient solution. Transit Gateway acts as a hub connecting all VPCs, enabling centralized traffic routing. Network Firewall deployed at the hub inspects traffic, enforces security policies, and generates logs. These logs can be aggregated into CloudWatch or S3 for real-time monitoring, alerting, and compliance reporting.
Option A), enabling VPC Flow Logs on each VPC, offers basic network visibility, but it lacks centralized policy enforcement. Managing flow logs across multiple accounts and regions is operationally intensive. Flow logs provide passive visibility, not active traffic control.
Option C), deploying individual security appliances in each VPC, requires manual configuration per VPC. This approach does not scale efficiently, is difficult to maintain, and increases costs and operational overhead.
Option D), Route 53 logging, focuses solely on DNS queries and cannot provide visibility into network flows or traffic between VPCs. It does not allow centralized enforcement or inspection of network traffic.
With Transit Gateway and Network Firewall, organizations gain a hub-and-spoke architecture where all VPC traffic flows through a central inspection point. Centralized logs enable detection of anomalies, performance bottlenecks, and suspicious activity without modifying individual VPCs. Dynamic route tables simplify traffic management and can optimize routing based on performance metrics or security policies. This architecture ensures operational efficiency, security, and compliance at scale across global AWS environments.
Question 19
A company is building a disaster recovery solution that requires multi-region VPC connectivity with automatic failover and optimized traffic routing. They also need encryption for data in transit. Which AWS design meets these requirements?
A) Interconnect all VPCs via VPC Peering with manual failover
B) Implement AWS Transit Gateway with inter-region peering, BGP, and VPN encryption
C) Use Site-to-Site VPN with static routing between each VPC
D) Connect VPCs with Direct Connect without Transit Gateway
Answer: B
Explanation:
Disaster recovery architectures require resilient, low-latency connectivity with automated failover mechanisms and secure transmission of data. AWS Transit Gateway with inter-region peering, BGP, and VPN encryption is the optimal design for these requirements. Transit Gateway acts as a centralized hub, connecting multiple VPCs across regions in a scalable hub-and-spoke model. Inter-region peering ensures traffic flows over AWS’s private backbone rather than the public internet, reducing latency and improving reliability.
Dynamic routing via BGP allows automatic route failover, rerouting traffic seamlessly in case of regional outages. VPN encryption ensures all data in transit is secured, meeting compliance and security requirements. Centralized route tables simplify traffic management while providing the flexibility to enforce security and compliance policies globally.
Option A), using VPC Peering with manual failover, lacks automatic failover and transitive routing. Operational complexity increases with the number of VPCs and regions. Peering does not provide encryption by default, which could compromise sensitive data.
Option C), Site-to-Site VPN with static routing, depends on the public internet and requires manual route changes during failover. This approach introduces latency variability and operational inefficiency.
Option D), Direct Connect without Transit Gateway, provides low-latency private connectivity but lacks centralized failover management, traffic inspection, or transitive routing. Multi-region setups require multiple Direct Connect circuits, which increases costs and complexity.
Using Transit Gateway with inter-region peering, BGP, and VPN encryption ensures a highly available, secure, and optimized multi-region disaster recovery network. Organizations benefit from automatic failover, centralized routing, scalable management, and compliance-ready encrypted traffic, making this architecture ideal for global enterprise resiliency strategies.
Question 20
An enterprise wants to optimize cross-region data replication between multiple VPCs while maintaining low latency, secure communication, and centralized traffic control. They also want to monitor network performance and detect anomalies. Which AWS solution best fulfills these requirements?
A) VPC Peering with individual monitoring on EC2 instances
B) AWS Transit Gateway with inter-region peering, Network Firewall, and CloudWatch integration
C) Site-to-Site VPN with static routes and local logging
D) Direct Connect circuits to each VPC with manual monitoring
Answer: B
Explanation:
For cross-region replication with secure, low-latency communication and centralized monitoring, AWS Transit Gateway with inter-region peering, Network Firewall, and CloudWatch integration is the most effective solution. Transit Gateway provides a hub-and-spoke network that connects multiple VPCs across regions, allowing traffic to traverse AWS’s private backbone instead of the public internet, reducing latency and improving reliability.
Integrating Network Firewall at the hub provides policy-based inspection, filtering, and logging for all inter-VPC traffic. This ensures sensitive data remains protected during replication and prevents unauthorized access. CloudWatch integration allows centralized monitoring, real-time performance tracking, anomaly detection, and alerting, enabling organizations to respond quickly to potential network issues.
Option A), VPC Peering with individual EC2 monitoring, does not scale well for multiple regions. Each EC2 instance requires configuration for monitoring and security, increasing operational overhead and introducing risk of misconfiguration.
Option C), Site-to-Site VPN with static routes and local logging, depends on the public internet, which increases latency and reduces reliability. Static routing also lacks automatic failover and centralized management.
Option D), Direct Connect circuits to each VPC with manual monitoring, offers private connectivity but does not provide centralized routing, traffic inspection, or automated anomaly detection. Managing multiple Direct Connect circuits across regions is operationally complex and costly.
By deploying Transit Gateway with inter-region peering, Network Firewall, and CloudWatch, enterprises achieve centralized control, low-latency routing, robust security, and proactive monitoring. This architecture enables efficient cross-region replication, operational scalability, and security compliance, making it ideal for large-scale, multi-region enterprise workloads.
