Pass Cisco ENCOR 350-401 Exam in First Attempt Easily

Latest Cisco ENCOR 350-401 Practice Test Questions, ENCOR Exam Dumps
Accurate & Verified Answers As Experienced in the Actual Test!

You save
$39.99
Save
Verified by experts
350-401 Premium Bundle
Exam Code: 350-401
Exam Name: Implementing Cisco Enterprise Network Core Technologies (ENCOR)
Certification Provider: Cisco
Bundle includes 3 products: Premium File, Training Course, Study Guide
accept downloads in the last 7 days
350-401 Premium Bundle
  • Premium File 763 Questions & Answers
    Last Update: Nov 1, 2026
  • Training Course 196 Lectures
  • Study Guide 636 Pages

Implementing Cisco Enterprise Network Core Technologies (ENCOR) 350-401 Practice Test 38

Question 370

A post-change test follows this action: use explicit outbound prefix filtering to restrict advertisements. Which result demonstrates success?

  1. `show route-map` counters rise for the matching source subnet.
  2. Only designated source prefixes increment the PBR match counter.
  3. Locally sourced test packets follow the local policy rather than the normal destination-only route.
  4. Advertised-routes output contains only approved prefixes.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Advertised-routes output contains only approved prefixes. This is the targeted operational evidence for the change. Broad `redistribute` without filters can leak unintended transit reachability. Merely entering the configuration or seeing a management session is less conclusive than observing the resulting behavior.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This observation validates another operation: Use policy-based routing with a source-match ACL and `set ip next-hop`. PBR can choose a next hop using traffic policy rather than destination-only RIB. It is not decisive evidence that the change under examination works as required. A relevant verification must exercise its particular control or forwarding outcome.

B:

This observation validates another operation: Narrow the route-map match ACL to the exact traffic population. An overly broad PBR match captures traffic meant to follow normal routing. It is not decisive evidence that the change under examination works as required. A relevant verification must exercise its particular control or forwarding outcome.

C:

This observation validates another operation: Use `ip local policy route-map` when routing router-generated packets by policy. Interface PBR does not automatically govern locally generated traffic. It is not decisive evidence that the change under examination works as required. A relevant verification must exercise its particular control or forwarding outcome.

Question 371

A branch needs to steer only application subnet 10.5.0.0/24 over a backup next hop. What is the most effective configuration or design response?

  1. Apply interface PBR on the incoming interface for transit traffic.
  2. Use supported next-hop reachability tracking or verify fallback design.
  3. Use policy-based routing with a source-match ACL and `set ip next-hop`.
  4. Make the OSPF neighbors' MTU settings consistent.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

PBR can choose a next hop using traffic policy rather than destination-only RIB. The most direct remediation is use policy-based routing with a source-match ACL and `set ip next-hop`. A practical acceptance test is `show route-map` counters rise for the matching source subnet. This distinguishes a configured intention from operational success.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This choice addresses a different situation: PBR is configured on an egress interface and has no effect on arriving LAN flows. Traditional interface policy-based routing acts on inbound packets. It does not specifically correct the issue here: a branch needs to steer only application subnet 10.5.0.0/24 over a backup next hop.

B:

This choice addresses a different situation: A policy next hop fails and selected traffic drops instead of reverting to routing. PBR next-hop availability must be monitored to avoid blackholing policy traffic. It does not specifically correct the issue here: a branch needs to steer only application subnet 10.5.0.0/24 over a backup next hop.

D:

This choice addresses a different situation: An OSPF adjacency stays in EXSTART with mismatched interface MTUs. OSPF database description exchange can fail when neighbors disagree on MTU. It does not specifically correct the issue here: a branch needs to steer only application subnet 10.5.0.0/24 over a backup next hop.

Question 372

During acceptance testing after use policy-based routing with a source-match ACL and `set ip next-hop`., which evidence is most relevant?

  1. The ingress interface reports the route-map and test traffic follows override.
  2. `show route-map` counters rise for the matching source subnet.
  3. Traffic reverts to a valid route or tracked alternate during next-hop failure.
  4. `show ip ospf neighbor` progresses beyond EXSTART to FULL.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

`show route-map` counters rise for the matching source subnet. This is the targeted operational evidence for the change. PBR can choose a next hop using traffic policy rather than destination-only RIB. Merely entering the configuration or seeing a management session is less conclusive than observing the resulting behavior.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This observation validates another operation: Apply interface PBR on the incoming interface for transit traffic. Traditional interface policy-based routing acts on inbound packets. It is not decisive evidence that the change under examination works as required. A relevant verification must exercise its particular control or forwarding outcome.

C:

This observation validates another operation: Use supported next-hop reachability tracking or verify fallback design. PBR next-hop availability must be monitored to avoid blackholing policy traffic. It is not decisive evidence that the change under examination works as required. A relevant verification must exercise its particular control or forwarding outcome.

D:

This observation validates another operation: Make the OSPF neighbors' MTU settings consistent. OSPF database description exchange can fail when neighbors disagree on MTU. It is not decisive evidence that the change under examination works as required. A relevant verification must exercise its particular control or forwarding outcome.

Question 373

PBR is configured on an egress interface and has no effect on arriving LAN flows. Which change should the network engineer prioritize?

  1. Apply interface PBR on the incoming interface for transit traffic.
  2. Narrow the route-map match ACL to the exact traffic population.
  3. Use `ip local policy route-map` when routing router-generated packets by policy.
  4. Recognize normal DROTHER-to-DROTHER 2-WAY state on a broadcast segment.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Traditional interface policy-based routing acts on inbound packets. The most direct remediation is apply interface PBR on the incoming interface for transit traffic. A practical acceptance test is the ingress interface reports the route-map and test traffic follows override. This distinguishes a configured intention from operational success.

Incorrect Answers

B:

This choice addresses a different situation: A PBR route-map matches all sources due to an overbroad ACL. An overly broad PBR match captures traffic meant to follow normal routing. It does not specifically correct the issue here: pBR is configured on an egress interface and has no effect on arriving LAN flows.

C:

This choice addresses a different situation: A router-originated ping ignores a transit interface's PBR route-map. Interface PBR does not automatically govern locally generated traffic. It does not specifically correct the issue here: pBR is configured on an egress interface and has no effect on arriving LAN flows.

D:

This choice addresses a different situation: Two OSPF routers on an Ethernet VLAN stay in 2-WAY despite healthy hellos. DROTHER routers need full adjacency with DR/BDR but not with each other. It does not specifically correct the issue here: pBR is configured on an egress interface and has no effect on arriving LAN flows.

Question 374

An operator has applied the following change: apply interface PBR on the incoming interface for transit traffic. Which observation best confirms it works?

  1. Only designated source prefixes increment the PBR match counter.
  2. Locally sourced test packets follow the local policy rather than the normal destination-only route.
  3. `show ip ospf neighbor` shows FULL adjacency to DR/BDR and 2-WAY among DROTHERs.
  4. The ingress interface reports the route-map and test traffic follows override.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

The ingress interface reports the route-map and test traffic follows override. This is the targeted operational evidence for the change. Traditional interface policy-based routing acts on inbound packets. Merely entering the configuration or seeing a management session is less conclusive than observing the resulting behavior.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This observation validates another operation: Narrow the route-map match ACL to the exact traffic population. An overly broad PBR match captures traffic meant to follow normal routing. It is not decisive evidence that the change under examination works as required. A relevant verification must exercise its particular control or forwarding outcome.

B:

This observation validates another operation: Use `ip local policy route-map` when routing router-generated packets by policy. Interface PBR does not automatically govern locally generated traffic. It is not decisive evidence that the change under examination works as required. A relevant verification must exercise its particular control or forwarding outcome.

C:

This observation validates another operation: Recognize normal DROTHER-to-DROTHER 2-WAY state on a broadcast segment. DROTHER routers need full adjacency with DR/BDR but not with each other. It is not decisive evidence that the change under examination works as required. A relevant verification must exercise its particular control or forwarding outcome.

Question 375

A PBR route-map matches all sources due to an overbroad ACL. Which remediation best resolves the described symptom?

  1. Use supported next-hop reachability tracking or verify fallback design.
  2. Make the OSPF neighbors' MTU settings consistent.
  3. Narrow the route-map match ACL to the exact traffic population.
  4. Align addressing and subnet membership on the connected interfaces.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

An overly broad PBR match captures traffic meant to follow normal routing. The most direct remediation is narrow the route-map match ACL to the exact traffic population. A practical acceptance test is only designated source prefixes increment the PBR match counter. This distinguishes a configured intention from operational success.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This choice addresses a different situation: A policy next hop fails and selected traffic drops instead of reverting to routing. PBR next-hop availability must be monitored to avoid blackholing policy traffic. It does not specifically correct the issue here: a PBR route-map matches all sources due to an overbroad ACL.

B:

This choice addresses a different situation: An OSPF adjacency stays in EXSTART with mismatched interface MTUs. OSPF database description exchange can fail when neighbors disagree on MTU. It does not specifically correct the issue here: a PBR route-map matches all sources due to an overbroad ACL.

D:

This choice addresses a different situation: An OSPF neighbor never appears because interface network masks differ. Neighbors need compatible directly connected interface reachability. It does not specifically correct the issue here: a PBR route-map matches all sources due to an overbroad ACL.

Question 376

After implementing narrow the route-map match ACL to the exact traffic population., which operational evidence should an engineer collect?

  1. Traffic reverts to a valid route or tracked alternate during next-hop failure.
  2. Only designated source prefixes increment the PBR match counter.
  3. `show ip ospf neighbor` progresses beyond EXSTART to FULL.
  4. Interface addresses share the intended subnet and hello exchange begins.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Only designated source prefixes increment the PBR match counter. This is the targeted operational evidence for the change. An overly broad PBR match captures traffic meant to follow normal routing. Merely entering the configuration or seeing a management session is less conclusive than observing the resulting behavior.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This observation validates another operation: Use supported next-hop reachability tracking or verify fallback design. PBR next-hop availability must be monitored to avoid blackholing policy traffic. It is not decisive evidence that the change under examination works as required. A relevant verification must exercise its particular control or forwarding outcome.

C:

This observation validates another operation: Make the OSPF neighbors' MTU settings consistent. OSPF database description exchange can fail when neighbors disagree on MTU. It is not decisive evidence that the change under examination works as required. A relevant verification must exercise its particular control or forwarding outcome.

D:

This observation validates another operation: Align addressing and subnet membership on the connected interfaces. Neighbors need compatible directly connected interface reachability. It is not decisive evidence that the change under examination works as required. A relevant verification must exercise its particular control or forwarding outcome.

Question 377

A policy next hop fails and selected traffic drops instead of reverting to routing. How should the team implement the required behavior?

  1. Use supported next-hop reachability tracking or verify fallback design.
  2. Use `ip local policy route-map` when routing router-generated packets by policy.
  3. Recognize normal DROTHER-to-DROTHER 2-WAY state on a broadcast segment.
  4. Set the OSPF interface network type to point-to-point where appropriate.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

PBR next-hop availability must be monitored to avoid blackholing policy traffic. The most direct remediation is use supported next-hop reachability tracking or verify fallback design. A practical acceptance test is traffic reverts to a valid route or tracked alternate during next-hop failure. This distinguishes a configured intention from operational success.

Incorrect Answers

B:

This choice addresses a different situation: A router-originated ping ignores a transit interface's PBR route-map. Interface PBR does not automatically govern locally generated traffic. It does not specifically correct the issue here: a policy next hop fails and selected traffic drops instead of reverting to routing.

C:

This choice addresses a different situation: Two OSPF routers on an Ethernet VLAN stay in 2-WAY despite healthy hellos. DROTHER routers need full adjacency with DR/BDR but not with each other. It does not specifically correct the issue here: a policy next hop fails and selected traffic drops instead of reverting to routing.

D:

This choice addresses a different situation: An OSPF point-to-point link suffers needless DR-election behavior. Point-to-point OSPF forms a direct adjacency without DR or BDR election. It does not specifically correct the issue here: a policy next hop fails and selected traffic drops instead of reverting to routing.

Question 378

The change request says: use supported next-hop reachability tracking or verify fallback design. Which verification result is most decisive?

  1. Locally sourced test packets follow the local policy rather than the normal destination-only route.
  2. `show ip ospf neighbor` shows FULL adjacency to DR/BDR and 2-WAY among DROTHERs.
  3. Both routers reach FULL and show point-to-point network type.
  4. Traffic reverts to a valid route or tracked alternate during next-hop failure.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Traffic reverts to a valid route or tracked alternate during next-hop failure. This is the targeted operational evidence for the change. PBR next-hop availability must be monitored to avoid blackholing policy traffic. Merely entering the configuration or seeing a management session is less conclusive than observing the resulting behavior.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This observation validates another operation: Use `ip local policy route-map` when routing router-generated packets by policy. Interface PBR does not automatically govern locally generated traffic. It is not decisive evidence that the change under examination works as required. A relevant verification must exercise its particular control or forwarding outcome.

B:

This observation validates another operation: Recognize normal DROTHER-to-DROTHER 2-WAY state on a broadcast segment. DROTHER routers need full adjacency with DR/BDR but not with each other. It is not decisive evidence that the change under examination works as required. A relevant verification must exercise its particular control or forwarding outcome.

C:

This observation validates another operation: Set the OSPF interface network type to point-to-point where appropriate. Point-to-point OSPF forms a direct adjacency without DR or BDR election. It is not decisive evidence that the change under examination works as required. A relevant verification must exercise its particular control or forwarding outcome.

Question 379

A router-originated ping ignores a transit interface's PBR route-map. What is the most appropriate corrective measure?

  1. Make the OSPF neighbors' MTU settings consistent.
  2. Align addressing and subnet membership on the connected interfaces.
  3. Use `ip local policy route-map` when routing router-generated packets by policy.
  4. Investigate one-way hello reachability and hello neighbor lists.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Interface PBR does not automatically govern locally generated traffic. The most direct remediation is use `ip local policy route-map` when routing router-generated packets by policy. A practical acceptance test is locally sourced test packets follow the local policy rather than the normal destination-only route. This distinguishes a configured intention from operational success.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This choice addresses a different situation: An OSPF adjacency stays in EXSTART with mismatched interface MTUs. OSPF database description exchange can fail when neighbors disagree on MTU. It does not specifically correct the issue here: a router-originated ping ignores a transit interface's PBR route-map.

B:

This choice addresses a different situation: An OSPF neighbor never appears because interface network masks differ. Neighbors need compatible directly connected interface reachability. It does not specifically correct the issue here: a router-originated ping ignores a transit interface's PBR route-map.

D:

This choice addresses a different situation: Two routers exchange OSPF hellos but the neighbor remains INIT. INIT means a router sees hellos without seeing its own RID acknowledged. It does not specifically correct the issue here: a router-originated ping ignores a transit interface's PBR route-map.

Question 380

A post-change test follows this action: use `ip local policy route-map` when routing router-generated packets by policy. Which result demonstrates success?

  1. `show ip ospf neighbor` progresses beyond EXSTART to FULL.
  2. Locally sourced test packets follow the local policy rather than the normal destination-only route.
  3. Interface addresses share the intended subnet and hello exchange begins.
  4. Neighbor debug shows bidirectional hello recognition after correction.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Locally sourced test packets follow the local policy rather than the normal destination-only route. This is the targeted operational evidence for the change. Interface PBR does not automatically govern locally generated traffic. Merely entering the configuration or seeing a management session is less conclusive than observing the resulting behavior.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This observation validates another operation: Make the OSPF neighbors' MTU settings consistent. OSPF database description exchange can fail when neighbors disagree on MTU. It is not decisive evidence that the change under examination works as required. A relevant verification must exercise its particular control or forwarding outcome.

C:

This observation validates another operation: Align addressing and subnet membership on the connected interfaces. Neighbors need compatible directly connected interface reachability. It is not decisive evidence that the change under examination works as required. A relevant verification must exercise its particular control or forwarding outcome.

D:

This observation validates another operation: Investigate one-way hello reachability and hello neighbor lists. INIT means a router sees hellos without seeing its own RID acknowledged. It is not decisive evidence that the change under examination works as required. A relevant verification must exercise its particular control or forwarding outcome.

Implementing Cisco Enterprise Network Core Technologies (ENCOR) (350-401) Practice Tests

Purchase Cisco ENCOR 350-401 Exam Training Products Individually

350-401 Questions & Answers
Premium File
763 Questions & Answers
Last Update: Nov 1, 2026
$59.99
350-401 Training Course
196 Lectures
$24.99
350-401 Study Guide
Study Guide
636 Pages
$24.99
accept downloads in the last 7 days
What exactly is 350-401 Premium File?

The 350-401 Premium File has been developed by industry professionals, who have been working with IT certifications for years and have close ties with IT certification vendors and holders - with most recent exam questions and valid answers.

350-401 Premium File is presented in VCE format. VCE (Virtual CertExam) is a file format that realistically simulates 350-401 exam environment, allowing for the most convenient exam preparation you can get - in the convenience of your own home or on the go. If you have ever seen IT exam simulations, chances are, they were in the VCE format.

What is VCE?

VCE is a file format associated with Visual CertExam Software. This format and software are widely used for creating tests for IT certifications. To create and open VCE files, you will need to purchase, download and install VCE Exam Simulator on your computer.

Can I try it for free?

Yes, you can. Look through free VCE files section and download any file you choose absolutely free.

Where do I get VCE Exam Simulator?

VCE Exam Simulator can be purchased from its developer, https://www.avanset.com. Please note that Exam-Labs does not sell or support this software. Should you have any questions or concerns about using this product, please contact Avanset support team directly.

How are Premium VCE files different from Free VCE files?

Premium VCE files have been developed by industry professionals, who have been working with IT certifications for years and have close ties with IT certification vendors and holders - with most recent exam questions and some insider information.

Free VCE files All files are sent by Exam-labs community members. We encourage everyone who has recently taken an exam and/or has come across some braindumps that have turned out to be true to share this information with the community by creating and sending VCE files. We don't say that these free VCEs sent by our members aren't reliable (experience shows that they are). But you should use your critical thinking as to what you download and memorize.

How long will I receive updates for 350-401 Premium VCE File that I purchased?

Free updates are available during 30 days after you purchased Premium VCE file. After 30 days the file will become unavailable.

How can I get the products after purchase?

All products are available for download immediately from your Member's Area. Once you have made the payment, you will be transferred to Member's Area where you can login and download the products you have purchased to your PC or another device.

Will I be able to renew my products when they expire?

Yes, when the 30 days of your product validity are over, you have the option of renewing your expired products with a 30% discount. This can be done in your Member's Area.

Please note that you will not be able to use the product after it has expired if you don't renew it.

How often are the questions updated?

We always try to provide the latest pool of questions, Updates in the questions depend on the changes in actual pool of questions by different vendors. As soon as we know about the change in the exam question pool we try our best to update the products as fast as possible.

What is a Study Guide?

Study Guides available on Exam-Labs are built by industry professionals who have been working with IT certifications for years. Study Guides offer full coverage on exam objectives in a systematic approach. Study Guides are very useful for fresh applicants and provides background knowledge about preparation of exams.

How can I open a Study Guide?

Any study guide can be opened by an official Acrobat by Adobe or any other reader application you use.

What is a Training Course?

Training Courses we offer on Exam-Labs in video format are created and managed by IT professionals. The foundation of each course are its lectures, which can include videos, slides and text. In addition, authors can add resources and various types of practice activities, as a way to enhance the learning experience of students.

Enter Your Email Address to Proceed

Please fill out your email address below in order to purchase Certification/Exam.

A confirmation link will be sent to this email address to verify your login.

Make sure to enter correct email address.

Enter Your Email Address to Proceed

Please fill out your email address below in order to purchase Demo.

A confirmation link will be sent to this email address to verify your login.

Make sure to enter correct email address.

Still Not Convinced?

Download 20 Sample Questions that you Will see in your
Cisco 350-401 exam.

Download 20 Free Questions

or Guarantee your success by buying the full version which covers
the full latest pool of questions. (763 Questions, Last Updated on
Nov 1, 2026)

How It Works

Download Exam
Step 1. Choose Exam
on Exam-Labs
Download IT Exams Questions & Answers
Download Avanset Simulator
Step 2. Open Exam with
Avanset Exam Simulator
Press here to download VCE Exam Simulator that simulates latest exam environment
Study
Step 3. Study
& Pass
IT Exams Anywhere, Anytime!

SPECIAL OFFER: GET 10% OFF. This is ONE TIME OFFER

You save
10%
Save
Exam-Labs Special Discount

Enter Your Email Address to Receive Your 10% Off Discount Code

A confirmation link will be sent to this email address to verify your login

* We value your privacy. We will not rent or sell your email address.

SPECIAL OFFER: GET 10% OFF

You save
10%
Save
Exam-Labs Special Discount

USE DISCOUNT CODE:

A confirmation link was sent to your email.

Please check your mailbox for a message from [email protected] and follow the directions.