Pass Cisco ENCOR 350-401 Exam in First Attempt Easily

Latest Cisco ENCOR 350-401 Practice Test Questions, ENCOR Exam Dumps
Accurate & Verified Answers As Experienced in the Actual Test!

You save
$39.99
Save
Verified by experts
350-401 Premium Bundle
Exam Code: 350-401
Exam Name: Implementing Cisco Enterprise Network Core Technologies (ENCOR)
Certification Provider: Cisco
Bundle includes 3 products: Premium File, Training Course, Study Guide
accept downloads in the last 7 days
350-401 Premium Bundle
  • Premium File 763 Questions & Answers
    Last Update: Nov 1, 2026
  • Training Course 196 Lectures
  • Study Guide 636 Pages

Implementing Cisco Enterprise Network Core Technologies (ENCOR) 350-401 Practice Test 11

Question 100

During acceptance testing after configure an appropriate priority-queue policing bound., which evidence is most relevant?

  1. Packet capture shows unauthorized EF traffic normalized at the ingress boundary.
  2. Queue statistics show a priority cap and continuing best-effort service.
  3. Measured outbound average matches the service contract with queue occupancy.
  4. Voice packets appear under their intended named class rather than class-default.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Queue statistics show a priority cap and continuing best-effort service. This is the targeted operational evidence for the change. An unbounded strict priority class can monopolize the output scheduler. Merely entering the configuration or seeing a management session is less conclusive than observing the resulting behavior.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This observation validates another operation: Classify and remark untrusted traffic at the network edge. DSCP should be trusted only from approved sources. It is not decisive evidence that the change under examination works as required. A relevant verification must exercise its particular control or forwarding outcome.

C:

This observation validates another operation: Apply outbound shaping to the committed rate on the WAN parent policy. Shaping buffers bursts rather than relying on provider ingress discards. It is not decisive evidence that the change under examination works as required. A relevant verification must exercise its particular control or forwarding outcome.

D:

This observation validates another operation: Correct the specific class match statements before relying on class-default. Class-default matches traffic not classified by previous policy classes. It is not decisive evidence that the change under examination works as required. A relevant verification must exercise its particular control or forwarding outcome.

Question 101

An ingress customer sends false EF-marked data packets. What is the most appropriate corrective measure?

  1. Classify and remark untrusted traffic at the network edge.
  2. Use shaping where buffering to a target rate is required.
  3. Verify class-map `match-all` versus `match-any` semantics.
  4. Use queue-limit or buffering diagnostics to assess burst behavior.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

DSCP should be trusted only from approved sources. The most direct remediation is classify and remark untrusted traffic at the network edge. A practical acceptance test is packet capture shows unauthorized EF traffic normalized at the ingress boundary. This distinguishes a configured intention from operational success.

Incorrect Answers

B:

This choice addresses a different situation: A policy uses `police` and users expect packets to be delayed smoothly. Policing normally drops or remarks excess packets rather than smoothing them. It does not specifically correct the issue here: an ingress customer sends false EF-marked data packets.

C:

This choice addresses a different situation: Traffic is being matched by access group but does not enter the chosen class. All conditions are required for match-all whereas any one satisfies match-any. It does not specifically correct the issue here: an ingress customer sends false EF-marked data packets.

D:

This choice addresses a different situation: A video queue is full even though the class has bandwidth configured. Guaranteed bandwidth does not eliminate queue overflow during short bursts. It does not specifically correct the issue here: an ingress customer sends false EF-marked data packets.

Question 102

An operator has applied the following change: classify and remark untrusted traffic at the network edge. Which observation best confirms it works?

  1. Output rates are smoothed with queues instead of excess-packet drops.
  2. Class counters increment only for packets matching the selected logic.
  3. Drops correlate with queue depth and rate under a controlled traffic test.
  4. Packet capture shows unauthorized EF traffic normalized at the ingress boundary.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Packet capture shows unauthorized EF traffic normalized at the ingress boundary. This is the targeted operational evidence for the change. DSCP should be trusted only from approved sources. Merely entering the configuration or seeing a management session is less conclusive than observing the resulting behavior.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This observation validates another operation: Use shaping where buffering to a target rate is required. Policing normally drops or remarks excess packets rather than smoothing them. It is not decisive evidence that the change under examination works as required. A relevant verification must exercise its particular control or forwarding outcome.

B:

This observation validates another operation: Verify class-map `match-all` versus `match-any` semantics. All conditions are required for match-all whereas any one satisfies match-any. It is not decisive evidence that the change under examination works as required. A relevant verification must exercise its particular control or forwarding outcome.

C:

This observation validates another operation: Use queue-limit or buffering diagnostics to assess burst behavior. Guaranteed bandwidth does not eliminate queue overflow during short bursts. It is not decisive evidence that the change under examination works as required. A relevant verification must exercise its particular control or forwarding outcome.

Question 103

A policy uses `police` and users expect packets to be delayed smoothly. Which action most directly addresses this situation?

  1. Apply outbound shaping to the committed rate on the WAN parent policy.
  2. Correct the specific class match statements before relying on class-default.
  3. Use shaping where buffering to a target rate is required.
  4. Translate or trust the appropriate CoS/DSCP markings at the switch boundary.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Policing normally drops or remarks excess packets rather than smoothing them. The most direct remediation is use shaping where buffering to a target rate is required. A practical acceptance test is output rates are smoothed with queues instead of excess-packet drops. This distinguishes a configured intention from operational success.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This choice addresses a different situation: A router sends beyond a provider contracted rate in bursts. Shaping buffers bursts rather than relying on provider ingress discards. It does not specifically correct the issue here: a policy uses `police` and users expect packets to be delayed smoothly.

B:

This choice addresses a different situation: The policy-map class default is unexpectedly catching voice traffic. Class-default matches traffic not classified by previous policy classes. It does not specifically correct the issue here: a policy uses `police` and users expect packets to be delayed smoothly.

D:

This choice addresses a different situation: A branch is honoring DSCP but not Layer-2 class-of-service. 802.1p CoS and IP DSCP belong to different encapsulation fields. It does not specifically correct the issue here: a policy uses `police` and users expect packets to be delayed smoothly.

Question 104

After implementing use shaping where buffering to a target rate is required., which operational evidence should an engineer collect?

  1. Measured outbound average matches the service contract with queue occupancy.
  2. Output rates are smoothed with queues instead of excess-packet drops.
  3. Voice packets appear under their intended named class rather than class-default.
  4. Marked 802.1Q frames and IP headers reflect the intended mapping.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Output rates are smoothed with queues instead of excess-packet drops. This is the targeted operational evidence for the change. Policing normally drops or remarks excess packets rather than smoothing them. Merely entering the configuration or seeing a management session is less conclusive than observing the resulting behavior.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This observation validates another operation: Apply outbound shaping to the committed rate on the WAN parent policy. Shaping buffers bursts rather than relying on provider ingress discards. It is not decisive evidence that the change under examination works as required. A relevant verification must exercise its particular control or forwarding outcome.

C:

This observation validates another operation: Correct the specific class match statements before relying on class-default. Class-default matches traffic not classified by previous policy classes. It is not decisive evidence that the change under examination works as required. A relevant verification must exercise its particular control or forwarding outcome.

D:

This observation validates another operation: Translate or trust the appropriate CoS/DSCP markings at the switch boundary. 802.1p CoS and IP DSCP belong to different encapsulation fields. It is not decisive evidence that the change under examination works as required. A relevant verification must exercise its particular control or forwarding outcome.

Question 105

A router sends beyond a provider contracted rate in bursts. What is the most effective configuration or design response?

  1. Apply outbound shaping to the committed rate on the WAN parent policy.
  2. Verify class-map `match-all` versus `match-any` semantics.
  3. Use queue-limit or buffering diagnostics to assess burst behavior.
  4. Allocate a separate bandwidth class with suitable queuing treatment.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Shaping buffers bursts rather than relying on provider ingress discards. The most direct remediation is apply outbound shaping to the committed rate on the WAN parent policy. A practical acceptance test is measured outbound average matches the service contract with queue occupancy. This distinguishes a configured intention from operational success.

Incorrect Answers

B:

This choice addresses a different situation: Traffic is being matched by access group but does not enter the chosen class. All conditions are required for match-all whereas any one satisfies match-any. It does not specifically correct the issue here: a router sends beyond a provider contracted rate in bursts.

C:

This choice addresses a different situation: A video queue is full even though the class has bandwidth configured. Guaranteed bandwidth does not eliminate queue overflow during short bursts. It does not specifically correct the issue here: a router sends beyond a provider contracted rate in bursts.

D:

This choice addresses a different situation: A small control flow needs low-latency service but should not use the voice queue. Not every control or interactive flow needs strict priority. It does not specifically correct the issue here: a router sends beyond a provider contracted rate in bursts.

Question 106

The change request says: apply outbound shaping to the committed rate on the WAN parent policy. Which verification result is most decisive?

  1. Class counters increment only for packets matching the selected logic.
  2. Drops correlate with queue depth and rate under a controlled traffic test.
  3. Queue output shows control class separate from voice LLQ.
  4. Measured outbound average matches the service contract with queue occupancy.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Measured outbound average matches the service contract with queue occupancy. This is the targeted operational evidence for the change. Shaping buffers bursts rather than relying on provider ingress discards. Merely entering the configuration or seeing a management session is less conclusive than observing the resulting behavior.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This observation validates another operation: Verify class-map `match-all` versus `match-any` semantics. All conditions are required for match-all whereas any one satisfies match-any. It is not decisive evidence that the change under examination works as required. A relevant verification must exercise its particular control or forwarding outcome.

B:

This observation validates another operation: Use queue-limit or buffering diagnostics to assess burst behavior. Guaranteed bandwidth does not eliminate queue overflow during short bursts. It is not decisive evidence that the change under examination works as required. A relevant verification must exercise its particular control or forwarding outcome.

C:

This observation validates another operation: Allocate a separate bandwidth class with suitable queuing treatment. Not every control or interactive flow needs strict priority. It is not decisive evidence that the change under examination works as required. A relevant verification must exercise its particular control or forwarding outcome.

Question 107

Traffic is being matched by access group but does not enter the chosen class. Which change should the network engineer prioritize?

  1. Correct the specific class match statements before relying on class-default.
  2. Translate or trust the appropriate CoS/DSCP markings at the switch boundary.
  3. Verify class-map `match-all` versus `match-any` semantics.
  4. Attach the policy with `service-policy` to the correct interface and direction.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

All conditions are required for match-all whereas any one satisfies match-any. The most direct remediation is verify class-map `match-all` versus `match-any` semantics. A practical acceptance test is class counters increment only for packets matching the selected logic. This distinguishes a configured intention from operational success.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This choice addresses a different situation: The policy-map class default is unexpectedly catching voice traffic. Class-default matches traffic not classified by previous policy classes. It does not specifically correct the issue here: traffic is being matched by access group but does not enter the chosen class.

B:

This choice addresses a different situation: A branch is honoring DSCP but not Layer-2 class-of-service. 802.1p CoS and IP DSCP belong to different encapsulation fields. It does not specifically correct the issue here: traffic is being matched by access group but does not enter the chosen class.

D:

This choice addresses a different situation: A policy map shows zero counters after being configured. Defining a map without binding it does not affect forwarding. It does not specifically correct the issue here: traffic is being matched by access group but does not enter the chosen class.

Question 108

A post-change test follows this action: verify class-map `match-all` versus `match-any` semantics. Which result demonstrates success?

  1. Voice packets appear under their intended named class rather than class-default.
  2. Class counters increment only for packets matching the selected logic.
  3. Marked 802.1Q frames and IP headers reflect the intended mapping.
  4. `show policy-map interface` displays the service policy and increasing counters.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Class counters increment only for packets matching the selected logic. This is the targeted operational evidence for the change. All conditions are required for match-all whereas any one satisfies match-any. Merely entering the configuration or seeing a management session is less conclusive than observing the resulting behavior.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This observation validates another operation: Correct the specific class match statements before relying on class-default. Class-default matches traffic not classified by previous policy classes. It is not decisive evidence that the change under examination works as required. A relevant verification must exercise its particular control or forwarding outcome.

C:

This observation validates another operation: Translate or trust the appropriate CoS/DSCP markings at the switch boundary. 802.1p CoS and IP DSCP belong to different encapsulation fields. It is not decisive evidence that the change under examination works as required. A relevant verification must exercise its particular control or forwarding outcome.

D:

This observation validates another operation: Attach the policy with `service-policy` to the correct interface and direction. Defining a map without binding it does not affect forwarding. It is not decisive evidence that the change under examination works as required. A relevant verification must exercise its particular control or forwarding outcome.

Question 109

The policy-map class default is unexpectedly catching voice traffic. Which remediation best resolves the described symptom?

  1. Correct the specific class match statements before relying on class-default.
  2. Use queue-limit or buffering diagnostics to assess burst behavior.
  3. Allocate a separate bandwidth class with suitable queuing treatment.
  4. Place shaping at the effective bottleneck or tunnel egress as appropriate.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Class-default matches traffic not classified by previous policy classes. The most direct remediation is correct the specific class match statements before relying on class-default. A practical acceptance test is voice packets appear under their intended named class rather than class-default. This distinguishes a configured intention from operational success.

Incorrect Answers

B:

This choice addresses a different situation: A video queue is full even though the class has bandwidth configured. Guaranteed bandwidth does not eliminate queue overflow during short bursts. It does not specifically correct the issue here: the policy-map class default is unexpectedly catching voice traffic.

C:

This choice addresses a different situation: A small control flow needs low-latency service but should not use the voice queue. Not every control or interactive flow needs strict priority. It does not specifically correct the issue here: the policy-map class default is unexpectedly catching voice traffic.

D:

This choice addresses a different situation: An upstream interface is uncongested while a slow tunnel is overloaded. QoS must be enforced where serialization or service rate constrains traffic. It does not specifically correct the issue here: the policy-map class default is unexpectedly catching voice traffic.

Question 110

During acceptance testing after correct the specific class match statements before relying on class-default., which evidence is most relevant?

  1. Drops correlate with queue depth and rate under a controlled traffic test.
  2. Queue output shows control class separate from voice LLQ.
  3. Per-class queue utilization changes on the actual congested egress.
  4. Voice packets appear under their intended named class rather than class-default.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Voice packets appear under their intended named class rather than class-default. This is the targeted operational evidence for the change. Class-default matches traffic not classified by previous policy classes. Merely entering the configuration or seeing a management session is less conclusive than observing the resulting behavior.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This observation validates another operation: Use queue-limit or buffering diagnostics to assess burst behavior. Guaranteed bandwidth does not eliminate queue overflow during short bursts. It is not decisive evidence that the change under examination works as required. A relevant verification must exercise its particular control or forwarding outcome.

B:

This observation validates another operation: Allocate a separate bandwidth class with suitable queuing treatment. Not every control or interactive flow needs strict priority. It is not decisive evidence that the change under examination works as required. A relevant verification must exercise its particular control or forwarding outcome.

C:

This observation validates another operation: Place shaping at the effective bottleneck or tunnel egress as appropriate. QoS must be enforced where serialization or service rate constrains traffic. It is not decisive evidence that the change under examination works as required. A relevant verification must exercise its particular control or forwarding outcome.

Implementing Cisco Enterprise Network Core Technologies (ENCOR) (350-401) Practice Tests

Purchase Cisco ENCOR 350-401 Exam Training Products Individually

350-401 Questions & Answers
Premium File
763 Questions & Answers
Last Update: Nov 1, 2026
$59.99
350-401 Training Course
196 Lectures
$24.99
350-401 Study Guide
Study Guide
636 Pages
$24.99
accept downloads in the last 7 days
What exactly is 350-401 Premium File?

The 350-401 Premium File has been developed by industry professionals, who have been working with IT certifications for years and have close ties with IT certification vendors and holders - with most recent exam questions and valid answers.

350-401 Premium File is presented in VCE format. VCE (Virtual CertExam) is a file format that realistically simulates 350-401 exam environment, allowing for the most convenient exam preparation you can get - in the convenience of your own home or on the go. If you have ever seen IT exam simulations, chances are, they were in the VCE format.

What is VCE?

VCE is a file format associated with Visual CertExam Software. This format and software are widely used for creating tests for IT certifications. To create and open VCE files, you will need to purchase, download and install VCE Exam Simulator on your computer.

Can I try it for free?

Yes, you can. Look through free VCE files section and download any file you choose absolutely free.

Where do I get VCE Exam Simulator?

VCE Exam Simulator can be purchased from its developer, https://www.avanset.com. Please note that Exam-Labs does not sell or support this software. Should you have any questions or concerns about using this product, please contact Avanset support team directly.

How are Premium VCE files different from Free VCE files?

Premium VCE files have been developed by industry professionals, who have been working with IT certifications for years and have close ties with IT certification vendors and holders - with most recent exam questions and some insider information.

Free VCE files All files are sent by Exam-labs community members. We encourage everyone who has recently taken an exam and/or has come across some braindumps that have turned out to be true to share this information with the community by creating and sending VCE files. We don't say that these free VCEs sent by our members aren't reliable (experience shows that they are). But you should use your critical thinking as to what you download and memorize.

How long will I receive updates for 350-401 Premium VCE File that I purchased?

Free updates are available during 30 days after you purchased Premium VCE file. After 30 days the file will become unavailable.

How can I get the products after purchase?

All products are available for download immediately from your Member's Area. Once you have made the payment, you will be transferred to Member's Area where you can login and download the products you have purchased to your PC or another device.

Will I be able to renew my products when they expire?

Yes, when the 30 days of your product validity are over, you have the option of renewing your expired products with a 30% discount. This can be done in your Member's Area.

Please note that you will not be able to use the product after it has expired if you don't renew it.

How often are the questions updated?

We always try to provide the latest pool of questions, Updates in the questions depend on the changes in actual pool of questions by different vendors. As soon as we know about the change in the exam question pool we try our best to update the products as fast as possible.

What is a Study Guide?

Study Guides available on Exam-Labs are built by industry professionals who have been working with IT certifications for years. Study Guides offer full coverage on exam objectives in a systematic approach. Study Guides are very useful for fresh applicants and provides background knowledge about preparation of exams.

How can I open a Study Guide?

Any study guide can be opened by an official Acrobat by Adobe or any other reader application you use.

What is a Training Course?

Training Courses we offer on Exam-Labs in video format are created and managed by IT professionals. The foundation of each course are its lectures, which can include videos, slides and text. In addition, authors can add resources and various types of practice activities, as a way to enhance the learning experience of students.

Enter Your Email Address to Proceed

Please fill out your email address below in order to purchase Certification/Exam.

A confirmation link will be sent to this email address to verify your login.

Make sure to enter correct email address.

Enter Your Email Address to Proceed

Please fill out your email address below in order to purchase Demo.

A confirmation link will be sent to this email address to verify your login.

Make sure to enter correct email address.

Still Not Convinced?

Download 20 Sample Questions that you Will see in your
Cisco 350-401 exam.

Download 20 Free Questions

or Guarantee your success by buying the full version which covers
the full latest pool of questions. (763 Questions, Last Updated on
Nov 1, 2026)

How It Works

Download Exam
Step 1. Choose Exam
on Exam-Labs
Download IT Exams Questions & Answers
Download Avanset Simulator
Step 2. Open Exam with
Avanset Exam Simulator
Press here to download VCE Exam Simulator that simulates latest exam environment
Study
Step 3. Study
& Pass
IT Exams Anywhere, Anytime!

SPECIAL OFFER: GET 10% OFF. This is ONE TIME OFFER

You save
10%
Save
Exam-Labs Special Discount

Enter Your Email Address to Receive Your 10% Off Discount Code

A confirmation link will be sent to this email address to verify your login

* We value your privacy. We will not rent or sell your email address.

SPECIAL OFFER: GET 10% OFF

You save
10%
Save
Exam-Labs Special Discount

USE DISCOUNT CODE:

A confirmation link was sent to your email.

Please check your mailbox for a message from [email protected] and follow the directions.