Cisco Certified Support Technician (CCST) Networking 100-150 Practice Test 67
Question 660
A change reviewer considers: At the fictional Willowbrook Campus during its network support shift, the team observes: A technician moves a workstation to a different port and the switch initially sends some traffic to its old location. During “Inspect the MAC address table and allow or trigger legitimate relearning after the move.”, which precaution MOST specifically prevents a related risk?
- Do not invent an unapproved alternate gateway IP on endpoints during an outage.
- Do not troubleshoot remote application sockets before restoring a failed gateway uplink.
- Do not hard-code stale MAC-to-port entries to hide a moving endpoint.
- Do not assume creating a local SVI automatically installs routes to every remote site.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:Correct. This precaution prevents a second fault while applying “Inspect the MAC address table and allow or trigger legitimate relearning after the move.” at the fictional Willowbrook Campus. The required protection is “Do not hard-code stale MAC-to-port entries to hide a moving endpoint.”; success still requires “The host's MAC now maps to the new port and frames are delivered correctly.”.
Incorrect Answers
A:This caution is appropriate for a separate failure pattern: A network has a redundant router and a failed primary gateway but the host points to a single unavailable default gateway IP. The principal adjacent risk here is controlled by “Do not hard-code stale MAC-to-port entries to hide a moving endpoint.”.
B:This caution is appropriate for a separate failure pattern: A PC sends traffic to a remote server but the gateway's Ethernet interface is down and the technician tries to edit only the server's application port. The principal adjacent risk here is controlled by “Do not hard-code stale MAC-to-port entries to hide a moving endpoint.”.
D:This caution is appropriate for a separate failure pattern: A VLAN interface 10.3.5.1/24 is intended to route client traffic but lacks any configuration for reaching 10.7.0.0/16 on another router. The principal adjacent risk here is controlled by “Do not hard-code stale MAC-to-port entries to hide a moving endpoint.”.
Question 661
During entry-level network support, consider: At the fictional Junction Student Center before a planned system change, the team observes: A junior engineer creates two direct Ethernet connections between switches and sees broadcast storms but disables all VLANs instead of checking Layer 2 loops. Which action MOST directly resolves the reported issue?
- Follow the documented switch uplink topology and confirm approved spanning-tree or redundancy settings.
- Examine the physical loop and the approved spanning-tree or port-channel design.
- Correct the branch route's next hop based on the approved topology and directly connected networks.
- Repatch the AP cable to the documented approved PoE-capable access port.
Explanation
Correct Answer
B:Correct. In the fictional Junction Student Center case, Parallel Layer 2 paths without correct loop prevention can create repeated flooding and broadcast storms. The specified corrective action, “Examine the physical loop and the approved spanning-tree or port-channel design.”, directly targets that condition. Evidence of resolution: The topology converges with no uncontrolled forwarding loop and broadcasts return to normal.
Incorrect Answers
A:That action addresses a different network issue: A field engineer provides a port-to-port cable schedule for a small three-switch network, but the technician connects each switch to every other switch without checking loop control. The present fictional Junction Student Center finding instead needs “Examine the physical loop and the approved spanning-tree or port-channel design.”, verified by “The topology converges with no uncontrolled forwarding loop and broadcasts return to normal.”.
C:That action addresses a different network issue: A router can reach an upstream router but cannot route to a downstream branch because its route points at an unrelated unreachable next-hop IP. The present fictional Junction Student Center finding instead needs “Examine the physical loop and the approved spanning-tree or port-channel design.”, verified by “The topology converges with no uncontrolled forwarding loop and broadcasts return to normal.”.
D:That action addresses a different network issue: A PoE access point is shown on port Gi1/0/12 but the technician patches it into a non-PoE port and it stays dark. The present fictional Junction Student Center finding instead needs “Examine the physical loop and the approved spanning-tree or port-channel design.”, verified by “The topology converges with no uncontrolled forwarding loop and broadcasts return to normal.”.
Question 662
The local support team reports: At the fictional Junction Student Center before a planned system change, the team observes: A junior engineer creates two direct Ethernet connections between switches and sees broadcast storms but disables all VLANs instead of checking Layer 2 loops. What is the MOST specific underlying cause?
- Parallel Layer 2 paths without correct loop prevention can create repeated flooding and broadcast storms.
- Port function is determined by actual hardware labels and configuration, not arbitrary patch-cable colors.
- Boot-time LED sequences may differ from steady-state operation and need model-specific interpretation.
- Mode-selectable switch LED indicators must be interpreted in the selected mode shown by the device.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:Correct. This mechanism fits the observed network symptom at the fictional Junction Student Center: Parallel Layer 2 paths without correct loop prevention can create repeated flooding and broadcast storms. The corresponding remedy is “Examine the physical loop and the approved spanning-tree or port-channel design.”. Confirmation: The topology converges with no uncontrolled forwarding loop and broadcasts return to normal.
Incorrect Answers
B:That cause belongs to a different case: A network team labels the RJ-45 connection on a firewall as a console because its cable is blue, while the interface status shows routed Ethernet traffic. The observed fictional Junction Student Center condition is specifically explained by “Parallel Layer 2 paths without correct loop prevention can create repeated flooding and broadcast storms.”.
C:That cause belongs to a different case: A router is still booting but a trainee marks an unusual transient system LED as a persistent failure before the startup interval ends. The observed fictional Junction Student Center condition is specifically explained by “Parallel Layer 2 paths without correct loop prevention can create repeated flooding and broadcast storms.”.
D:That cause belongs to a different case: A switch displays several selectable LED modes and a technician reads a power-over-Ethernet status LED as though it were showing duplex. The observed fictional Junction Student Center condition is specifically explained by “Parallel Layer 2 paths without correct loop prevention can create repeated flooding and broadcast storms.”.
Question 663
The technician must verify the following scenario: At the fictional Junction Student Center before a planned system change, the team observes: A junior engineer creates two direct Ethernet connections between switches and sees broadcast storms but disables all VLANs instead of checking Layer 2 loops. The approved corrective action is: “Examine the physical loop and the approved spanning-tree or port-channel design.” Which result BEST demonstrates success?
- The host reaches off-subnet services after the documented gateway failover mechanism operates.
- The routing table resolves the next hop and a branch subnet ping succeeds.
- Both distribution switches report their intended fiber link operational.
- The topology converges with no uncontrolled forwarding loop and broadcasts return to normal.
Explanation
Correct Answer
D:Correct. This is the required observable acceptance evidence for “Examine the physical loop and the approved spanning-tree or port-channel design.” at the fictional Junction Student Center. It demonstrates correction of the original cause: Parallel Layer 2 paths without correct loop prevention can create repeated flooding and broadcast storms.
Incorrect Answers
A:That result is evidence for a separate corrective action, “Validate the approved gateway availability mechanism and host default-gateway address.”. It does not establish the intended outcome “The topology converges with no uncontrolled forwarding loop and broadcasts return to normal.” for the fictional Junction Student Center case.
B:That result is evidence for a separate corrective action, “Correct the branch route's next hop based on the approved topology and directly connected networks.”. It does not establish the intended outcome “The topology converges with no uncontrolled forwarding loop and broadcasts return to normal.” for the fictional Junction Student Center case.
C:That result is evidence for a separate corrective action, “Use the specified compatible fiber run and transceivers for the distribution uplink.”. It does not establish the intended outcome “The topology converges with no uncontrolled forwarding loop and broadcasts return to normal.” for the fictional Junction Student Center case.
Question 664
A change reviewer considers: At the fictional Junction Student Center before a planned system change, the team observes: A junior engineer creates two direct Ethernet connections between switches and sees broadcast storms but disables all VLANs instead of checking Layer 2 loops. During “Examine the physical loop and the approved spanning-tree or port-channel design.”, which precaution MOST specifically prevents a related risk?
- Do not use a router console port as a general Ethernet access port.
- Do not assume a data link-up LED guarantees adequate power delivery to an endpoint.
- Do not add parallel Layer 2 links without appropriate loop-prevention controls.
- Do not describe stack identification lights as generic link-speed meters.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:Correct. This precaution prevents a second fault while applying “Examine the physical loop and the approved spanning-tree or port-channel design.” at the fictional Junction Student Center. The required protection is “Do not add parallel Layer 2 links without appropriate loop-prevention controls.”; success still requires “The topology converges with no uncontrolled forwarding loop and broadcasts return to normal.”.
Incorrect Answers
A:This caution is appropriate for a separate failure pattern: A wiring plan shows workstation cable runs terminating on patch-panel ports that should connect to a local access switch, but the installer jumps those ports directly into an unrelated WAN router console. The principal adjacent risk here is controlled by “Do not add parallel Layer 2 links without appropriate loop-prevention controls.”.
B:This caution is appropriate for a separate failure pattern: A switch has a dedicated PoE indicator showing a supply fault but the operator checks only standard per-port link lights. The principal adjacent risk here is controlled by “Do not add parallel Layer 2 links without appropriate loop-prevention controls.”.
D:This caution is appropriate for a separate failure pattern: A technician photographs a stack member LED and labels it a line-rate speed indicator on a switch model with separate stacking status. The principal adjacent risk here is controlled by “Do not add parallel Layer 2 links without appropriate loop-prevention controls.”.
Question 665
During entry-level network support, consider: At the fictional Bramble Insurance in a technician onboarding review, the team observes: A technician sends an ARP broadcast in VLAN 20 and expects it to flood into VLAN 30 without routing or relay. Which action MOST directly resolves the reported issue?
- Identify the console jack and attach a compatible USB or serial console adapter as specified.
- Confirm the broadcast scope and identify the routing or relay service required for cross-VLAN needs.
- Choose the correct physical COM or USB serial adapter and attach it to the Cisco console interface.
- Install an approved SFP transceiver matching the cable and link speed.
Explanation
Correct Answer
B:Correct. In the fictional Bramble Insurance case, VLAN membership confines ordinary Layer 2 broadcasts to their respective broadcast domains. The specified corrective action, “Confirm the broadcast scope and identify the routing or relay service required for cross-VLAN needs.”, directly targets that condition. Evidence of resolution: A test broadcast stays inside VLAN 20 while routed services communicate as designed.
Incorrect Answers
A:That action addresses a different network issue: A work order specifies a dedicated console cable from a notebook to a switch for initial setup but the tech plugs into the switch's user-data uplink instead. The present fictional Bramble Insurance finding instead needs “Confirm the broadcast scope and identify the routing or relay service required for cross-VLAN needs.”, verified by “A test broadcast stays inside VLAN 20 while routed services communicate as designed.”.
C:That action addresses a different network issue: A technician attempts an out-of-band serial session by entering a device's IP address in a terminal emulator without connecting a console cable. The present fictional Bramble Insurance finding instead needs “Confirm the broadcast scope and identify the routing or relay service required for cross-VLAN needs.”, verified by “A test broadcast stays inside VLAN 20 while routed services communicate as designed.”.
D:That action addresses a different network issue: A switch has a removable SFP slot and a trainee tries to plug an RJ-45 patch cord directly into the empty metal cage. The present fictional Bramble Insurance finding instead needs “Confirm the broadcast scope and identify the routing or relay service required for cross-VLAN needs.”, verified by “A test broadcast stays inside VLAN 20 while routed services communicate as designed.”.
Question 666
The local support team reports: At the fictional Bramble Insurance in a technician onboarding review, the team observes: A technician sends an ARP broadcast in VLAN 20 and expects it to flood into VLAN 30 without routing or relay. What is the MOST specific underlying cause?
- VLAN membership confines ordinary Layer 2 broadcasts to their respective broadcast domains.
- Redundant topology requires distinct documented ports and correct optical terminations on each link.
- The planned distance and installed optical interfaces require compatible fiber media rather than ordinary copper patching.
- Longest-prefix matching selects a specific matching route over a less-specific default route.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:Correct. This mechanism fits the observed network symptom at the fictional Bramble Insurance: VLAN membership confines ordinary Layer 2 broadcasts to their respective broadcast domains. The corresponding remedy is “Confirm the broadcast scope and identify the routing or relay service required for cross-VLAN needs.”. Confirmation: A test broadcast stays inside VLAN 20 while routed services communicate as designed.
Incorrect Answers
B:That cause belongs to a different case: A rack elevation places two redundant uplinks on separate switch ports but the installer connects both strands to the same unsupported transceiver and records two working paths. The observed fictional Bramble Insurance condition is specifically explained by “VLAN membership confines ordinary Layer 2 broadcasts to their respective broadcast domains.”.
C:That cause belongs to a different case: A diagram specifies a fiber link between two distribution switches but the installer uses a short twisted-pair patch cord to bridge the racks across a long cable tray. The observed fictional Bramble Insurance condition is specifically explained by “VLAN membership confines ordinary Layer 2 broadcasts to their respective broadcast domains.”.
D:That cause belongs to a different case: A branch router has a specific route to 10.20.0.0/16 and a default route, but the trainee expects all 10.x.x.x traffic to use the default. The observed fictional Bramble Insurance condition is specifically explained by “VLAN membership confines ordinary Layer 2 broadcasts to their respective broadcast domains.”.
Question 667
The technician must verify the following scenario: At the fictional Bramble Insurance in a technician onboarding review, the team observes: A technician sends an ARP broadcast in VLAN 20 and expects it to flood into VLAN 30 without routing or relay. The approved corrective action is: “Confirm the broadcast scope and identify the routing or relay service required for cross-VLAN needs.” Which result BEST demonstrates success?
- The intended rack unit is identified and the locator signal is disabled after the task.
- Each labeled workstation link appears on its assigned switch port and passes a local connectivity test.
- A traceroute reaches the remote subnet and replies return without an asymmetric black hole.
- A test broadcast stays inside VLAN 20 while routed services communicate as designed.
Explanation
Correct Answer
D:Correct. This is the required observable acceptance evidence for “Confirm the broadcast scope and identify the routing or relay service required for cross-VLAN needs.” at the fictional Bramble Insurance. It demonstrates correction of the original cause: VLAN membership confines ordinary Layer 2 broadcasts to their respective broadcast domains.
Incorrect Answers
A:That result is evidence for a separate corrective action, “Confirm with the engineer and model documentation whether identification mode was activated.”. It does not establish the intended outcome “A test broadcast stays inside VLAN 20 while routed services communicate as designed.” for the fictional Bramble Insurance case.
B:That result is evidence for a separate corrective action, “Patch the designated panel jacks into the mapped switch access ports.”. It does not establish the intended outcome “A test broadcast stays inside VLAN 20 while routed services communicate as designed.” for the fictional Bramble Insurance case.
C:That result is evidence for a separate corrective action, “Add or verify the approved route toward 10.7.0.0/16 and any necessary return path.”. It does not establish the intended outcome “A test broadcast stays inside VLAN 20 while routed services communicate as designed.” for the fictional Bramble Insurance case.
Question 668
A change reviewer considers: At the fictional Bramble Insurance in a technician onboarding review, the team observes: A technician sends an ARP broadcast in VLAN 20 and expects it to flood into VLAN 30 without routing or relay. During “Confirm the broadcast scope and identify the routing or relay service required for cross-VLAN needs.”, which precaution MOST specifically prevents a related risk?
- Do not assume routers select an output based on visually similar IPv4 digits.
- Do not infer port speed or duplex from an indicator currently set to another display mode.
- Do not treat a VLAN-separated switch as one universal broadcast domain.
- Do not treat an unpowered device as an IP routing problem before checking electrical supply.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:Correct. This precaution prevents a second fault while applying “Confirm the broadcast scope and identify the routing or relay service required for cross-VLAN needs.” at the fictional Bramble Insurance. The required protection is “Do not treat a VLAN-separated switch as one universal broadcast domain.”; success still requires “A test broadcast stays inside VLAN 20 while routed services communicate as designed.”.
Incorrect Answers
A:This caution is appropriate for a separate failure pattern: A router receives a destination IP not found in any specific route and has no default route, but an operator insists it must choose the nearest numerically named interface. The principal adjacent risk here is controlled by “Do not treat a VLAN-separated switch as one universal broadcast domain.”.
B:This caution is appropriate for a separate failure pattern: A switch displays several selectable LED modes and a technician reads a power-over-Ethernet status LED as though it were showing duplex. The principal adjacent risk here is controlled by “Do not treat a VLAN-separated switch as one universal broadcast domain.”.
D:This caution is appropriate for a separate failure pattern: A new switch has no power indicator after rack installation, but a trainee diagnoses failed IP routing before checking its supply. The principal adjacent risk here is controlled by “Do not treat a VLAN-separated switch as one universal broadcast domain.”.
Question 669
During entry-level network support, consider: At the fictional Glenhaven Council while checking a service ticket, the team observes: A security printer should be reachable only on VLAN 40 but its access port is assigned to VLAN 10 and users cannot reach it at its planned subnet. Which action MOST directly resolves the reported issue?
- Patch the designated panel jacks into the mapped switch access ports.
- Correct the printer's switch port to the documented access VLAN and verify its address scope.
- Identify the current LED display mode and consult the model's port-status legend.
- Record the exact model, LED name, color and blink pattern and interpret it using the model's documented table.
Explanation
Correct Answer
B:Correct. In the fictional Glenhaven Council case, Incorrect access-port VLAN assignment places the endpoint in a different Layer 2 segment. The specified corrective action, “Correct the printer's switch port to the documented access VLAN and verify its address scope.”, directly targets that condition. Evidence of resolution: The port displays VLAN 40 and the printer reaches its intended gateway.
Incorrect Answers
A:That action addresses a different network issue: A wiring plan shows workstation cable runs terminating on patch-panel ports that should connect to a local access switch, but the installer jumps those ports directly into an unrelated WAN router console. The present fictional Glenhaven Council finding instead needs “Correct the printer's switch port to the documented access VLAN and verify its address scope.”, verified by “The port displays VLAN 40 and the printer reaches its intended gateway.”.
C:That action addresses a different network issue: A switch displays several selectable LED modes and a technician reads a power-over-Ethernet status LED as though it were showing duplex. The present fictional Glenhaven Council finding instead needs “Correct the printer's switch port to the documented access VLAN and verify its address scope.”, verified by “The port displays VLAN 40 and the printer reaches its intended gateway.”.
D:That action addresses a different network issue: A network engineer tells a junior tech to report an amber status light on a particular switch module; the tech immediately replaces the module without reading the model instructions. The present fictional Glenhaven Council finding instead needs “Correct the printer's switch port to the documented access VLAN and verify its address scope.”, verified by “The port displays VLAN 40 and the printer reaches its intended gateway.”.
Question 670
The local support team reports: At the fictional Glenhaven Council while checking a service ticket, the team observes: A security printer should be reachable only on VLAN 40 but its access port is assigned to VLAN 10 and users cannot reach it at its planned subnet. What is the MOST specific underlying cause?
- Incorrect access-port VLAN assignment places the endpoint in a different Layer 2 segment.
- The diagram assigns endpoint copper runs to switch access interfaces rather than an administrative console connection.
- Static routes require valid reachable next-hop information or an appropriate output interface.
- An absent link indicator can indicate a physical connection or disabled-interface condition prior to DHCP negotiation.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:Correct. This mechanism fits the observed network symptom at the fictional Glenhaven Council: Incorrect access-port VLAN assignment places the endpoint in a different Layer 2 segment. The corresponding remedy is “Correct the printer's switch port to the documented access VLAN and verify its address scope.”. Confirmation: The port displays VLAN 40 and the printer reaches its intended gateway.
Incorrect Answers
B:That cause belongs to a different case: A wiring plan shows workstation cable runs terminating on patch-panel ports that should connect to a local access switch, but the installer jumps those ports directly into an unrelated WAN router console. The observed fictional Glenhaven Council condition is specifically explained by “Incorrect access-port VLAN assignment places the endpoint in a different Layer 2 segment.”.
C:That cause belongs to a different case: A router can reach an upstream router but cannot route to a downstream branch because its route points at an unrelated unreachable next-hop IP. The observed fictional Glenhaven Council condition is specifically explained by “Incorrect access-port VLAN assignment places the endpoint in a different Layer 2 segment.”.
D:That cause belongs to a different case: A field worker sees no link light on an attached Ethernet port and configures a new DHCP scope before checking the cable. The observed fictional Glenhaven Council condition is specifically explained by “Incorrect access-port VLAN assignment places the endpoint in a different Layer 2 segment.”.