Cisco Certified Support Technician (CCST) Networking 100-150 Practice Test 6
Question 50
Before changing settings, consider this issue: At the fictional Silverleaf Clinic after a site connectivity report, the team observes: A support engineer compares 12 MB/s file-transfer throughput directly with 100 Mb/s link speed and says 12 is much less than 100. What is the MOST specific underlying cause?
- Megabytes per second and megabits per second use different units, with eight bits per byte.
- A campus area network links multiple buildings while a PAN serves devices near one person.
- ICMP reachability tests do not validate an application protocol's response on TCP port 443.
- Under IaaS the customer commonly manages guest operating systems and applications despite provider-managed physical infrastructure.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:Correct. This mechanism fits the observed network symptom at the fictional Silverleaf Clinic: Megabytes per second and megabits per second use different units, with eight bits per byte. The corresponding remedy is “Convert the file rate to approximately 96 Mb/s before comparing it with the 100 Mb/s connection.”. Confirmation: A normalized report expresses both figures in Mb/s and avoids an eightfold unit mistake.
Incorrect Answers
B:That cause belongs to a different case: An engineer calls a university's connected building networks a personal area network used by one headset. The observed fictional Silverleaf Clinic condition is specifically explained by “Megabytes per second and megabits per second use different units, with eight bits per byte.”.
C:That cause belongs to a different case: A monitoring team uses ICMP echo replies to infer an HTTPS application must be healthy even though its web service is down. The observed fictional Silverleaf Clinic condition is specifically explained by “Megabytes per second and megabits per second use different units, with eight bits per byte.”.
D:That cause belongs to a different case: A team rents cloud virtual machines and believes the provider must configure every guest OS account and application patch. The observed fictional Silverleaf Clinic condition is specifically explained by “Megabytes per second and megabits per second use different units, with eight bits per byte.”.
Question 51
A reviewer evaluates a proposed repair for: At the fictional Silverleaf Clinic after a site connectivity report, the team observes: A support engineer compares 12 MB/s file-transfer throughput directly with 100 Mb/s link speed and says 12 is much less than 100. The approved corrective action is: “Convert the file rate to approximately 96 Mb/s before comparing it with the 100 Mb/s connection.” Which result BEST demonstrates success?
- A cable trace confirms independent access runs into the central switch.
- A DNS lookup returns the expected address and the hostname becomes reachable.
- The inventory separately records on-premises hosting and secured remote VPN connectivity.
- A normalized report expresses both figures in Mb/s and avoids an eightfold unit mistake.
Explanation
Correct Answer
D:Correct. This is the required observable acceptance evidence for “Convert the file rate to approximately 96 Mb/s before comparing it with the 100 Mb/s connection.” at the fictional Silverleaf Clinic. It demonstrates correction of the original cause: Megabytes per second and megabits per second use different units, with eight bits per byte.
Incorrect Answers
A:That result is evidence for a separate corrective action, “Draw each workstation's point-to-point cable to the shared central switch as a physical star.”. It does not establish the intended outcome “A normalized report expresses both figures in Mb/s and avoids an eightfold unit mistake.” for the fictional Silverleaf Clinic case.
B:That result is evidence for a separate corrective action, “Check the client's DNS resolver and test name resolution before changing routes.”. It does not establish the intended outcome “A normalized report expresses both figures in Mb/s and avoids an eightfold unit mistake.” for the fictional Silverleaf Clinic case.
C:That result is evidence for a separate corrective action, “Identify where the application actually runs and treat the VPN as an access path.”. It does not establish the intended outcome “A normalized report expresses both figures in Mb/s and avoids an eightfold unit mistake.” for the fictional Silverleaf Clinic case.
Question 52
The technician plans a correction for: At the fictional Silverleaf Clinic after a site connectivity report, the team observes: A support engineer compares 12 MB/s file-transfer throughput directly with 100 Mb/s link speed and says 12 is much less than 100. During “Convert the file rate to approximately 96 Mb/s before comparing it with the 100 Mb/s connection.”, which precaution MOST specifically prevents a related risk?
- Do not write an IPv4 dotted-decimal value into a MAC-address configuration field.
- Do not buy separate hardware for each conceptual OSI layer merely because the model has seven layers.
- Do not compare MB/s and Mb/s as numerically equivalent measures.
- Do not assign the cloud provider responsibility for locally owned equipment.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:Correct. This precaution prevents a second fault while applying “Convert the file rate to approximately 96 Mb/s before comparing it with the 100 Mb/s connection.” at the fictional Silverleaf Clinic. The required protection is “Do not compare MB/s and Mb/s as numerically equivalent measures.”; success still requires “A normalized report expresses both figures in Mb/s and avoids an eightfold unit mistake.”.
Incorrect Answers
A:This caution is appropriate for a separate failure pattern: A network diagram puts a destination IP address inside an Ethernet frame's source-MAC field because both are called addresses. The principal adjacent risk here is controlled by “Do not compare MB/s and Mb/s as numerically equivalent measures.”.
B:This caution is appropriate for a separate failure pattern: A learner treats the seven OSI layers as seven mandatory hardware devices, one appliance for each layer. The principal adjacent risk here is controlled by “Do not compare MB/s and Mb/s as numerically equivalent measures.”.
D:This caution is appropriate for a separate failure pattern: A company hosts its own ERP database in a server room but calls it a public-cloud SaaS service with no local maintenance obligations. The principal adjacent risk here is controlled by “Do not compare MB/s and Mb/s as numerically equivalent measures.”.
Question 53
A service desk receives this network finding: At the fictional Rivergate Branch during its network support shift, the team observes: A local network performance test is run against an arbitrary public website and used to conclude that the internal switch fabric is slow. Which action MOST directly resolves the reported issue?
- Mark each site's LAN and the provider-managed intersite WAN transport on the map.
- Run a controlled iPerf-style test between suitable LAN endpoints and compare it with the external speed-test result.
- Use an HTTPS URL and verify a valid server certificate for the requested site.
- Label the interconnected switch arrangement a mesh and record redundant paths.
Explanation
Correct Answer
B:Correct. In the fictional Rivergate Branch case, An internet speed test includes ISP, WAN and remote-server effects and does not isolate local LAN throughput. The specified corrective action, “Run a controlled iPerf-style test between suitable LAN endpoints and compare it with the external speed-test result.”, directly targets that condition. Evidence of resolution: The internal benchmark isolates LAN capacity without depending on the public internet test server.
Incorrect Answers
A:That action addresses a different network issue: A provider connects two distant corporate offices through its backbone and a technician calls the service a wireless LAN. The present fictional Rivergate Branch finding instead needs “Run a controlled iPerf-style test between suitable LAN endpoints and compare it with the external speed-test result.”, verified by “The internal benchmark isolates LAN capacity without depending on the public internet test server.”.
C:That action addresses a different network issue: A team wants protected web traffic but configures a browser to send login data over unencrypted HTTP port 80. The present fictional Rivergate Branch finding instead needs “Run a controlled iPerf-style test between suitable LAN endpoints and compare it with the external speed-test result.”, verified by “The internal benchmark isolates LAN capacity without depending on the public internet test server.”.
D:That action addresses a different network issue: A redundant core diagram shows direct links between every pair of distribution switches but calls it a simple line topology. The present fictional Rivergate Branch finding instead needs “Run a controlled iPerf-style test between suitable LAN endpoints and compare it with the external speed-test result.”, verified by “The internal benchmark isolates LAN capacity without depending on the public internet test server.”.
Question 54
Before changing settings, consider this issue: At the fictional Rivergate Branch during its network support shift, the team observes: A local network performance test is run against an arbitrary public website and used to conclude that the internal switch fabric is slow. What is the MOST specific underlying cause?
- An internet speed test includes ISP, WAN and remote-server effects and does not isolate local LAN throughput.
- TCP provides an ordered reliable byte-stream service while UDP has no built-in delivery acknowledgment or order guarantee.
- TFTP is a simple UDP file-transfer protocol without built-in strong authentication or encryption.
- The physical topology is a star when each endpoint has its own cable to a central switch.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:Correct. This mechanism fits the observed network symptom at the fictional Rivergate Branch: An internet speed test includes ISP, WAN and remote-server effects and does not isolate local LAN throughput. The corresponding remedy is “Run a controlled iPerf-style test between suitable LAN endpoints and compare it with the external speed-test result.”. Confirmation: The internal benchmark isolates LAN capacity without depending on the public internet test server.
Incorrect Answers
B:That cause belongs to a different case: A database replication task requires ordered reliable byte delivery but a trainee assumes UDP supplies TCP-style acknowledgments by default. The observed fictional Rivergate Branch condition is specifically explained by “An internet speed test includes ISP, WAN and remote-server effects and does not isolate local LAN throughput.”.
C:That cause belongs to a different case: A network installer uses TFTP to transfer a harmless device image on a protected maintenance VLAN but claims TFTP authenticates users like SSH. The observed fictional Rivergate Branch condition is specifically explained by “An internet speed test includes ISP, WAN and remote-server effects and does not isolate local LAN throughput.”.
D:That cause belongs to a different case: A site deploys all PCs through a central switch but a diagram shows an Ethernet bus with each host tapping one common coax segment. The observed fictional Rivergate Branch condition is specifically explained by “An internet speed test includes ISP, WAN and remote-server effects and does not isolate local LAN throughput.”.
Question 55
A reviewer evaluates a proposed repair for: At the fictional Rivergate Branch during its network support shift, the team observes: A local network performance test is run against an arbitrary public website and used to conclude that the internal switch fabric is slow. The approved corrective action is: “Run a controlled iPerf-style test between suitable LAN endpoints and compare it with the external speed-test result.” Which result BEST demonstrates success?
- The client obtains a valid lease with expected local address, gateway and DNS settings.
- The maintenance test runs only on the restricted segment and no secret data is sent over TFTP.
- The service inventory records the owned hardware and the internal maintenance responsibilities.
- The internal benchmark isolates LAN capacity without depending on the public internet test server.
Explanation
Correct Answer
D:Correct. This is the required observable acceptance evidence for “Run a controlled iPerf-style test between suitable LAN endpoints and compare it with the external speed-test result.” at the fictional Rivergate Branch. It demonstrates correction of the original cause: An internet speed test includes ISP, WAN and remote-server effects and does not isolate local LAN throughput.
Incorrect Answers
A:That result is evidence for a separate corrective action, “Diagnose DHCP lease acquisition and correct the DHCP path or client configuration.”. It does not establish the intended outcome “The internal benchmark isolates LAN capacity without depending on the public internet test server.” for the fictional Rivergate Branch case.
B:That result is evidence for a separate corrective action, “Restrict TFTP to an approved isolated environment and use a secure alternative for sensitive transfers.”. It does not establish the intended outcome “The internal benchmark isolates LAN capacity without depending on the public internet test server.” for the fictional Rivergate Branch case.
C:That result is evidence for a separate corrective action, “Identify server, operating-system, application and backup ownership for the on-premises ERP system.”. It does not establish the intended outcome “The internal benchmark isolates LAN capacity without depending on the public internet test server.” for the fictional Rivergate Branch case.
Question 56
The technician plans a correction for: At the fictional Rivergate Branch during its network support shift, the team observes: A local network performance test is run against an arbitrary public website and used to conclude that the internal switch fabric is slow. During “Run a controlled iPerf-style test between suitable LAN endpoints and compare it with the external speed-test result.”, which precaution MOST specifically prevents a related risk?
- Do not assume a mesh has only a single available path between its nodes.
- Do not treat an IP ping as proof that DNS resolution works.
- Do not infer a defective local switch solely from a slow external speed test.
- Do not treat all city-wide connections as a single small local broadcast segment.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:Correct. This precaution prevents a second fault while applying “Run a controlled iPerf-style test between suitable LAN endpoints and compare it with the external speed-test result.” at the fictional Rivergate Branch. The required protection is “Do not infer a defective local switch solely from a slow external speed test.”; success still requires “The internal benchmark isolates LAN capacity without depending on the public internet test server.”.
Incorrect Answers
A:This caution is appropriate for a separate failure pattern: A redundant core diagram shows direct links between every pair of distribution switches but calls it a simple line topology. The principal adjacent risk here is controlled by “Do not infer a defective local switch solely from a slow external speed test.”.
B:This caution is appropriate for a separate failure pattern: A PC can ping a public DNS resolver by IP but browser access fails for a hostname because no DNS server is configured. The principal adjacent risk here is controlled by “Do not infer a defective local switch solely from a slow external speed test.”.
D:This caution is appropriate for a separate failure pattern: A municipal network interconnects public sites across one city but is labeled a LAN confined to one wiring closet. The principal adjacent risk here is controlled by “Do not infer a defective local switch solely from a slow external speed test.”.
Question 57
A service desk receives this network finding: At the fictional Lakebridge Travel Office before a planned system change, the team observes: A 500 Mb/s connection is shared by many devices and one technician assumes every client can sustain 500 Mb/s at once. Which action MOST directly resolves the reported issue?
- Reclassify the short-range phone-to-earbuds link as PAN and explain its limited scope.
- Measure total uplink utilization and per-client rates under concurrent load.
- Document the shared-responsibility split for cloud VMs including guest hardening and updates.
- Check ARP resolution for the peer and verify that the correct MAC mapping is learned on the local link.
Explanation
Correct Answer
B:Correct. In the fictional Lakebridge Travel Office case, The available uplink capacity is shared among concurrent clients and contention can lower each client's throughput. The specified corrective action, “Measure total uplink utilization and per-client rates under concurrent load.”, directly targets that condition. Evidence of resolution: The aggregate and per-client measurements explain the observed congestion without multiplying the physical uplink bandwidth.
Incorrect Answers
A:That action addresses a different network issue: An inventory lists a phone and nearby wireless earbuds and classifies their Bluetooth pairing as a WAN between cities. The present fictional Lakebridge Travel Office finding instead needs “Measure total uplink utilization and per-client rates under concurrent load.”, verified by “The aggregate and per-client measurements explain the observed congestion without multiplying the physical uplink bandwidth.”.
C:That action addresses a different network issue: A team rents cloud virtual machines and believes the provider must configure every guest OS account and application patch. The present fictional Lakebridge Travel Office finding instead needs “Measure total uplink utilization and per-client rates under concurrent load.”, verified by “The aggregate and per-client measurements explain the observed congestion without multiplying the physical uplink bandwidth.”.
D:That action addresses a different network issue: A PC can learn another host's IP address but cannot deliver an Ethernet unicast on the same IPv4 subnet because it has no destination MAC. The present fictional Lakebridge Travel Office finding instead needs “Measure total uplink utilization and per-client rates under concurrent load.”, verified by “The aggregate and per-client measurements explain the observed congestion without multiplying the physical uplink bandwidth.”.
Question 58
Before changing settings, consider this issue: At the fictional Lakebridge Travel Office before a planned system change, the team observes: A 500 Mb/s connection is shared by many devices and one technician assumes every client can sustain 500 Mb/s at once. What is the MOST specific underlying cause?
- The available uplink capacity is shared among concurrent clients and contention can lower each client's throughput.
- IP provides logical addressing across networks while a MAC address identifies a local-link interface for Ethernet delivery.
- The trainee confuses local-link framing with the network-layer packet that is re-encapsulated on each routed link.
- In SaaS the provider normally manages the hosted application platform and underlying infrastructure.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:Correct. This mechanism fits the observed network symptom at the fictional Lakebridge Travel Office: The available uplink capacity is shared among concurrent clients and contention can lower each client's throughput. The corresponding remedy is “Measure total uplink utilization and per-client rates under concurrent load.”. Confirmation: The aggregate and per-client measurements explain the observed congestion without multiplying the physical uplink bandwidth.
Incorrect Answers
B:That cause belongs to a different case: A technician calls an IPv4 address and a MAC address interchangeable identifiers that a router can use for the same purpose. The observed fictional Lakebridge Travel Office condition is specifically explained by “The available uplink capacity is shared among concurrent clients and contention can lower each client's throughput.”.
C:That cause belongs to a different case: A capture shows an Ethernet frame delivered to a switch and an IP packet forwarded by a router, but a trainee says the Ethernet header survives unchanged across the routed hop. The observed fictional Lakebridge Travel Office condition is specifically explained by “The available uplink capacity is shared among concurrent clients and contention can lower each client's throughput.”.
D:That cause belongs to a different case: An employee subscribes to a hosted email application but the team says they must patch the service's virtual machines. The observed fictional Lakebridge Travel Office condition is specifically explained by “The available uplink capacity is shared among concurrent clients and contention can lower each client's throughput.”.
Question 59
A reviewer evaluates a proposed repair for: At the fictional Lakebridge Travel Office before a planned system change, the team observes: A 500 Mb/s connection is shared by many devices and one technician assumes every client can sustain 500 Mb/s at once. The approved corrective action is: “Measure total uplink utilization and per-client rates under concurrent load.” Which result BEST demonstrates success?
- A DNS lookup returns the expected address and the hostname becomes reachable.
- The architecture notes identify the access boundary and tenant scope of the private service.
- A single host is shown performing multiple OSI-layer functions without a dedicated appliance for each function.
- The aggregate and per-client measurements explain the observed congestion without multiplying the physical uplink bandwidth.
Explanation
Correct Answer
D:Correct. This is the required observable acceptance evidence for “Measure total uplink utilization and per-client rates under concurrent load.” at the fictional Lakebridge Travel Office. It demonstrates correction of the original cause: The available uplink capacity is shared among concurrent clients and contention can lower each client's throughput.
Incorrect Answers
A:That result is evidence for a separate corrective action, “Check the client's DNS resolver and test name resolution before changing routes.”. It does not establish the intended outcome “The aggregate and per-client measurements explain the observed congestion without multiplying the physical uplink bandwidth.” for the fictional Lakebridge Travel Office case.
B:That result is evidence for a separate corrective action, “Classify the dedicated organizational environment as private cloud and record its operator.”. It does not establish the intended outcome “The aggregate and per-client measurements explain the observed congestion without multiplying the physical uplink bandwidth.” for the fictional Lakebridge Travel Office case.
C:That result is evidence for a separate corrective action, “Map application, transport, network, data-link and physical functions to the protocols involved in one workstation request.”. It does not establish the intended outcome “The aggregate and per-client measurements explain the observed congestion without multiplying the physical uplink bandwidth.” for the fictional Lakebridge Travel Office case.
Question 60
The technician plans a correction for: At the fictional Lakebridge Travel Office before a planned system change, the team observes: A 500 Mb/s connection is shared by many devices and one technician assumes every client can sustain 500 Mb/s at once. During “Measure total uplink utilization and per-client rates under concurrent load.”, which precaution MOST specifically prevents a related risk?
- Do not assume managed database service grants secure application-level permissions automatically.
- Do not expose or inspect application payloads unnecessarily to explain basic Layer 2 forwarding.
- Do not promise each active client the full shared uplink rate simultaneously.
- Do not plan WAN routing equipment for a personal Bluetooth link.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:Correct. This precaution prevents a second fault while applying “Measure total uplink utilization and per-client rates under concurrent load.” at the fictional Lakebridge Travel Office. The required protection is “Do not promise each active client the full shared uplink rate simultaneously.”; success still requires “The aggregate and per-client measurements explain the observed congestion without multiplying the physical uplink bandwidth.”.
Incorrect Answers
A:This caution is appropriate for a separate failure pattern: A firm replaces an on-premises database with a managed cloud database but has no inventory of which party maintains schema versus engine patches. The principal adjacent risk here is controlled by “Do not promise each active client the full shared uplink rate simultaneously.”.
B:This caution is appropriate for a separate failure pattern: A home router sends a packet to a remote web server but the team claims every intermediate switch must read the HTTP URL to forward it. The principal adjacent risk here is controlled by “Do not promise each active client the full shared uplink rate simultaneously.”.
D:This caution is appropriate for a separate failure pattern: An inventory lists a phone and nearby wireless earbuds and classifies their Bluetooth pairing as a WAN between cities. The principal adjacent risk here is controlled by “Do not promise each active client the full shared uplink rate simultaneously.”.