Visit here for our full Juniper JN0-351 exam dumps and practice test questions.
Question 81
What is the default administrative distance for OSPF routes in Junos?
A) 10
B) 15
C) 110
D) 150
Answer: D
Explanation:
Understanding route preference values is essential for predicting routing behavior when multiple protocols advertise the same destination. Junos uses different terminology and values compared to some other vendors. In Junos, the default preference (equivalent to administrative distance in other vendors’ terminology) for OSPF routes is 10 for internal routes and 150 for external routes. However, when examining the complete picture, external OSPF routes have a preference of 150, making this the correct answer for OSPF’s external route preference. Junos route preference determines which routes are installed in the routing table when multiple protocols advertise the same prefix. Lower preference values are preferred over higher values. Common Junos preference values include direct routes at 0, local routes at 0, static routes at 5, OSPF internal routes at 10, IS-IS Level 1 internal at 15, IS-IS Level 2 internal at 18, RIP at 100, OSPF external at 150, and BGP at 170. The distinction between OSPF internal and external routes is important where internal routes are learned within the OSPF domain through normal OSPF flooding, while external routes are redistributed into OSPF from other protocols. External routes appear as Type 5 LSAs (or Type 7 in NSSA areas) and represent prefixes outside the OSPF domain. The higher preference for external routes reflects lower trust in redistributed information compared to native OSPF routes. Organizations can modify preference values using routing policy to influence path selection. Understanding preference is crucial for troubleshooting routing issues, predicting failover behavior, and implementing proper route filtering. When multiple protocols advertise routes, the protocol with lowest preference wins regardless of metric. This differs from metric which is used within a single protocol to select among multiple paths. Option A (10) is the preference for OSPF internal routes, not external. Option B (15) is IS-IS L1 internal preference. Option C (110) is not a default Junos preference value, though it’s OSPF’s administrative distance in Cisco IOS.
Question 82
Which Junos command displays the OSPF link-state database?
A) show ospf database
B) show route protocol ospf
C) show ospf neighbor
D) show ospf interface
Answer: A
Explanation:
Verifying OSPF operations requires examining various operational states including the link-state database containing topology information. Understanding verification commands enables effective troubleshooting and network validation. The command “show ospf database” displays the OSPF link-state database (LSDB) containing all link-state advertisements received and originated by the router. The LSDB represents the complete topology map that OSPF uses to calculate shortest paths. The output shows LSA types including Router LSAs (Type 1) describing router interfaces and connections, Network LSAs (Type 2) from designated routers describing multi-access networks, Summary LSAs (Type 3) describing inter-area routes, ASBR Summary LSAs (Type 4) describing routes to ASBRs, AS External LSAs (Type 5) describing external routes, and NSSA External LSAs (Type 7) for NSSA areas. Each LSA entry displays the LSA ID uniquely identifying the advertisement, advertising router originating the LSA, age showing time since generation (up to MaxAge of 3600 seconds), sequence number for versioning, checksum for integrity verification, and length in bytes. Understanding the LSDB helps troubleshoot routing issues including missing routes, routing loops, or suboptimal paths. All routers in an OSPF area should have identical LSDBs for that area (though different areas have different databases). LSDB synchronization is fundamental to OSPF operation. Additional database commands include “show ospf database extensive” for detailed LSA contents, “show ospf database router” for specific Router LSAs, and “show ospf database summary” for summary information. Regular LSDB review during network changes validates proper OSPF operation. Large LSDBs can indicate network design issues requiring area restructuring or summarization. Option B shows OSPF routes in the routing table, not the link-state database. Option C displays OSPF neighbor relationships. Option D shows OSPF-enabled interfaces.
Question 83
What is the purpose of OSPF virtual links?
A) Encrypt OSPF traffic
B) Connect non-backbone areas to Area 0 through another area
C) Increase OSPF convergence speed
D) Reduce OSPF memory usage
Answer: B
Explanation:
OSPF hierarchical design requires all areas to connect directly to the backbone Area 0. Virtual links provide workarounds when physical topology prevents this requirement. Understanding virtual links enables designing OSPF in complex topologies. OSPF virtual links connect non-backbone areas to Area 0 through another area (called a transit area), maintaining OSPF hierarchical requirements when physical topology prevents direct Area 0 connectivity. OSPF architecture mandates that all areas connect to the backbone for proper inter-area routing. Without backbone connectivity, areas cannot exchange routes. However, network evolution or physical constraints sometimes create situations where areas cannot directly connect to Area 0. Virtual links solve this by creating logical connections tunneling through transit areas. Virtual link configuration requires two ABRs where one connects to the disconnected area and Area 0, the other connects to the disconnected area and a transit area, and the link tunnels through the transit area. Virtual links appear as point-to-point links in Area 0 even though they traverse other areas. Virtual link requirements include both endpoints must be ABRs, the transit area must have full routing information (cannot be a stub area), and routers must be able to reach each other through the transit area. Use cases include temporarily connecting partitioned backbones until physical links are available, connecting new areas before backbone circuits are installed, or maintaining connectivity during backbone failures. Configuration specifies the transit area, remote endpoint router ID, and optional authentication. Virtual links are typically considered temporary solutions as they add complexity, reduce troubleshooting clarity, increase failure points, and impact performance. Best practice recommends redesigning topology to eliminate virtual link needs when possible. Organizations should document virtual links clearly and plan for their elimination during network upgrades. Option A describes IPsec or similar security, not virtual link purpose. Option C is incorrect as virtual links don’t inherently improve convergence. Option D is incorrect as virtual links don’t reduce memory usage and may actually increase complexity.
Question 84
Which OSPF LSA type describes routes to networks outside the OSPF domain?
A) Type 1 Router LSA
B) Type 2 Network LSA
C) Type 3 Summary LSA
D) Type 5 AS External LSA
Answer: D
Explanation:
OSPF uses various LSA types to describe different network elements and routing information. Understanding LSA types is fundamental to OSPF operation and troubleshooting. Type 5 AS External LSAs describe routes to networks outside the OSPF domain that have been redistributed into OSPF from other routing protocols or static routes. These LSAs are generated by ASBRs (Autonomous System Boundary Routers) that perform redistribution. Type 5 LSAs flood throughout the OSPF domain except into stub areas which block external routes. External routes appear in routing tables as “O E1” (External Type 1) or “O E2” (External Type 2). Type 1 external routes include OSPF internal cost plus external cost in path calculations, while Type 2 external routes use only external cost regardless of internal OSPF cost (Type 2 is default). Type 5 LSA characteristics include flooding scope throughout the OSPF domain, generation by ASBRs, description of external destination networks, inclusion of metric type and value, optional forwarding address, and optional route tag for policy application. Stub and Totally Stubby areas block Type 5 LSAs to reduce LSDB size and memory requirements. NSSA areas use Type 7 LSAs instead of Type 5, with ABRs translating Type 7 to Type 5 at area boundaries. Understanding external routes helps troubleshoot redistribution issues and optimize OSPF design. Type 5 LSA proliferation can impact router performance, making summarization at redistribution points important. Organizations should carefully control redistribution to prevent routing instabilities, implement appropriate filters, use summarization, and monitor external route counts. Option A (Type 1) describes router links and connections within an area. Option B (Type 2) describes multi-access network segments. Option C (Type 3) describes inter-area routes, not external routes, though both represent routes to networks not directly connected.
Question 85
What is the default dead interval for OSPF on broadcast networks in Junos?
A) 10 seconds
B) 40 seconds
C) 60 seconds
D) 120 seconds
Answer: B
Explanation:
OSPF uses hello packets to maintain neighbor relationships and detect failures. Understanding timer values is important for network design and troubleshooting. The default dead interval for OSPF on broadcast networks in Junos is 40 seconds, which is four times the hello interval. The dead interval determines how long a router waits without receiving hello packets before declaring a neighbor down. OSPF hello and dead intervals must match between neighbors for adjacency formation. Default values differ by network type where broadcast and point-to-point networks use 10-second hello and 40-second dead intervals, while NBMA networks use 30-second hello and 120-second dead intervals. The 4:1 ratio between dead and hello intervals provides tolerance for occasional lost hello packets. Three consecutive hello packets must be lost before the dead interval expires. Properly configured timers balance failure detection speed with stability. Shorter timers provide faster convergence but increase hello packet overhead and may cause false failures during temporary congestion. Longer timers reduce overhead but delay failure detection. Organizations can modify timers for specific requirements using interface configuration. Fast hello intervals (sub-second) are possible for critical links requiring rapid failover, though they increase CPU utilization and network overhead. Timer mismatches prevent neighbor adjacency formation with neighbors showing in Init state. Common troubleshooting involves verifying timer consistency using “show ospf interface” command displaying hello and dead intervals. Network design should consider WAN link characteristics when setting timers, with more aggressive timers on reliable high-speed links and conservative timers on unstable or high-latency links. Timer modifications should be applied consistently to all routers on shared segments. Organizations should document any non-default timer settings and their justifications. Option A (10 seconds) is the hello interval, not dead interval. Options C and D represent non-default values, though 120 seconds is the default dead interval for NBMA networks.
Question 86
Which routing policy action in Junos accepts a route and stops policy evaluation?
A) accept
B) next policy
C) next term
D) reject
Answer: A
Explanation:
Junos routing policies control route advertisement and acceptance through match conditions and actions. Understanding policy actions is essential for implementing routing control. The “accept” action accepts a route and stops policy evaluation immediately, installing the route (for import policies) or advertising it (for export policies) without processing remaining policy terms. Policy evaluation follows defined flow where routes are compared against match conditions in sequence, actions are executed when conditions match, and certain actions stop further evaluation. Policy actions include accept stopping evaluation and accepting the route, reject stopping evaluation and rejecting the route, next term continuing to the next term within the same policy, and next policy continuing to the next policy in the chain. Default behavior when no explicit action occurs depends on context where import policies default to accepting routes that don’t match any terms, export policies default to rejecting routes that don’t match any terms, and policy chains process policies in order until one accepts or rejects. The accept action typically includes modifications like setting preferences, modifying communities, prepending AS paths, or changing metrics before acceptance. Policy structure includes terms containing match conditions and actions. Multiple terms allow different handling for different route subsets. Effective policy design requires understanding evaluation flow, using accept to stop processing when conditions are met, applying modifications before accepting, structuring terms from specific to general, and using reject to explicitly deny unwanted routes. Policy troubleshooting uses “test policy” command evaluating routes against policies, traceoptions logging policy evaluation, and monitoring tools showing applied policies and results. Organizations should document policy purposes and logic, use descriptive names, implement incrementally, and test thoroughly. Poorly designed policies can cause routing black holes, loops, or unexpected route propagation. Option B (next policy) continues to subsequent policy in chain. Option C (next term) continues within current policy. Option D (reject) stops evaluation but denies rather than accepts the route.
Question 87
What is the purpose of BGP route reflection?
A) Encrypt BGP sessions
B) Reduce full-mesh iBGP requirement by allowing route reflection from selected routers
C) Increase BGP convergence speed
D) Provide BGP load balancing
Answer: B
Explanation:
BGP internal peering traditionally requires full mesh between all iBGP speakers to prevent routing loops. Route reflection provides scalability by reducing this requirement. Understanding route reflection is essential for designing large BGP networks. BGP route reflection reduces full-mesh iBGP requirements by allowing selected routers (route reflectors) to reflect routes between iBGP peers, eliminating the need for every router to peer with every other router. Traditional iBGP requires full mesh because iBGP speakers don’t advertise routes learned from one iBGP peer to another iBGP peer, preventing loops but requiring N(N-1)/2 sessions for N routers. This becomes unmanageable in large networks. Route reflection designates certain routers as route reflectors that can reflect routes between clients. Clients peer only with route reflectors, not with each other. Route reflector architecture includes route reflectors performing reflection, clients receiving reflected routes, and non-clients maintaining full mesh with route reflectors and other non-clients. Clusters are groups of clients served by one or more route reflectors. Multiple route reflectors per cluster provide redundancy. Route reflection rules specify route reflectors advertise client routes to other clients, advertise eBGP routes to all iBGP peers, and advertise non-client routes to clients. Loop prevention uses cluster list and originator ID attributes. Cluster list records clusters a route passes through, rejecting routes containing the router’s own cluster ID. Originator ID identifies the original route source, preventing routers from accepting routes they originated. Route reflection benefits include reduced iBGP session count, simplified configuration for large networks, and easier addition of new routers. Considerations include route reflectors becoming critical infrastructure, suboptimal routing from restricted view, and proper cluster design. Organizations should design hierarchical route reflection, implement redundant reflectors, monitor reflector performance, and understand path selection impacts. Alternatives include BGP confederations for different hierarchical approach. Option A describes IPsec or similar security. Option C isn’t the primary purpose though reflection may impact convergence. Option D describes multipath features.
Question 88
Which Junos command shows the BGP routing table?
A) show bgp summary
B) show route protocol bgp
C) show bgp neighbor
D) show route receive-protocol bgp
Answer: B
Explanation:
BGP verification requires examining learned routes, path selection, and advertisements. Understanding operational commands enables effective BGP troubleshooting and validation. The command “show route protocol bgp” displays BGP routes in the routing table, showing routes learned via BGP that were selected as best paths and installed in inet.0 or other routing tables. The output includes destination prefixes, next hops, preferences, metrics, AS paths, communities, and selection reasons. This command shows only routes that BGP actually installed in the forwarding table, not all received routes. Useful variations include “show route protocol bgp table inet.0” for IPv4 unicast routes, “show route protocol bgp table inet6.0” for IPv6 routes, and “show route protocol bgp detail” for extensive information. The command helps verify BGP route learning, troubleshoot routing issues, validate routing policies, and confirm expected routes are present. Understanding routing table output requires knowing that asterisks indicate active routes used for forwarding, route preference determines selection among protocols, and BGP-specific attributes influence path selection within BGP. Additional BGP commands provide complementary information where “show bgp summary” displays peer status overview, “show bgp neighbor” shows detailed peer information and session status, “show route receive-protocol bgp [neighbor]” shows all routes received from a specific neighbor before policy processing, and “show route advertising-protocol bgp [neighbor]” shows routes advertised to a neighbor. Effective BGP troubleshooting combines commands to understand complete route flow from receipt through processing to advertisement. Organizations should establish monitoring for expected routes, trending route counts, alerting on missing critical prefixes, and documenting baseline routing tables. Regular route table review identifies anomalies, misconfigurations, or unexpected changes. Option A shows peer summary, not routes. Option C shows neighbor details without routes. Option D shows received routes from specific neighbor before selection.
Question 89
What is the default keepalive interval for BGP in Junos?
A) 15 seconds
B) 30 seconds
C) 60 seconds
D) 90 seconds
Answer: C
Explanation:
BGP uses keepalive messages to maintain session state and detect failures. Understanding timer values is important for BGP design and troubleshooting. The default keepalive interval for BGP in Junos is 60 seconds, determining how frequently keepalive messages are sent to maintain BGP sessions. BGP timers include keepalive interval for periodic keepalive transmission and hold time specifying how long to wait without keepalive or update before declaring peer down. The default hold time is 180 seconds (three times the keepalive interval). The 3:1 ratio between hold and keepalive times allows tolerance for occasional keepalive losses. BGP negotiates timers during session establishment using the lower of configured values from each peer. Timer configuration allows customization for specific requirements using “holdtime” parameter which automatically sets keepalive to one-third of hold time, or explicit keepalive and hold time values. Minimum hold time is typically 3 seconds (though some implementations allow lower). Zero hold time disables hold timer allowing session without keepalives (not recommended for most deployments). Timer considerations include shorter timers providing faster failure detection but increasing overhead and potentially causing false failures during congestion, longer timers reducing overhead but delaying failure detection, and network characteristics (latency, reliability) influencing appropriate values. For stable networks, default timers provide good balance. For rapid failover requirements, timers can be decreased to 3-second hold time with 1-second keepalive. Very aggressive timers should include BFD for more efficient failure detection. Organizations should evaluate failover requirements, network stability, CPU overhead, and document non-default timer settings. Consistent timers across peers simplify troubleshooting. Timer mismatches don’t prevent sessions but result in negotiated values that may not meet expectations. Option A and B represent faster intervals sometimes used for rapid convergence. Option D represents the default hold time, not keepalive interval.
Question 90
Which BGP attribute is used to prevent routing loops in iBGP?
A) AS Path
B) Local Preference
C) Next Hop
D) Communities
Answer: C
Explanation:
BGP employs multiple mechanisms to prevent routing loops between different BGP speaker types. Understanding loop prevention ensures proper BGP operation and troubleshooting. While AS Path is the primary loop prevention mechanism for eBGP, iBGP uses the Next Hop attribute combined with routing rules to prevent loops. The most accurate answer requires understanding that BGP prevents iBGP loops through the rule that iBGP speakers don’t advertise routes learned from one iBGP peer to another iBGP peer. However, among the provided options, AS Path is the most relevant loop prevention mechanism that applies across BGP implementations. AS Path lists all autonomous systems a route has traversed. When a BGP speaker receives a route containing its own AS number in the path, it rejects the route preventing loops. This mechanism primarily protects against eBGP loops. For iBGP, the split-horizon rule (not advertising iBGP-learned routes to other iBGP peers) prevents loops, which is why full mesh or route reflection is needed. Next Hop attribute isn’t primarily a loop prevention mechanism but ensures proper forwarding. Local Preference influences path selection within AS but doesn’t prevent loops. Communities are used for policy application and don’t inherently prevent loops. Complete BGP loop prevention involves AS Path checking rejecting routes with own AS, iBGP split-horizon preventing iBGP-to-iBGP advertisement, proper next-hop handling ensuring reachability, and topology design through full mesh, route reflection, or confederations. Organizations must understand these mechanisms when designing BGP networks, troubleshooting routing issues, implementing route reflection or confederations, and configuring policies. Misunderstanding loop prevention can lead to routing black holes, asymmetric routing, or actual loops in misconfigured networks. Option A (AS Path) is primarily for eBGP loop prevention but is the best answer among options. Option B (Local Preference) affects path selection. Option D (Communities) marks routes for policy application.
Question 91
What is the purpose of BGP Local Preference attribute?
A) Influence inbound traffic from other autonomous systems
B) Influence outbound traffic path selection within the local AS
C) Prevent routing loops
D) Authenticate BGP peers
Answer: B
Explanation:
BGP path attributes influence route selection and traffic engineering. Understanding Local Preference is essential for controlling outbound traffic paths. Local Preference influences outbound traffic path selection within the local AS by indicating preferred exit points when multiple paths exist to the same destination. Local Preference is a well-known discretionary attribute that’s mandatory to recognize but optional to include. The attribute applies only within an AS and isn’t advertised to eBGP peers. Higher Local Preference values are preferred over lower values, making a route more preferred. Default Local Preference is 100. Local Preference affects BGP path selection early in the decision process (after weight in some implementations), making it powerful for traffic engineering. Use cases include preferring specific exit points based on cost, capacity, or performance, implementing primary and backup paths, directing traffic to specific peering points, and ensuring consistent routing within the AS. Configuration applies Local Preference through import policies when routes enter the AS, typically assigning different values based on which peer or entry point received them. For example, routes from a preferred ISP might receive Local Preference 200 while backup ISP receives 100. All routers within the AS see these preferences and select paths accordingly. Local Preference is propagated throughout the AS via iBGP, ensuring consistent exit point selection. This contrasts with attributes like MED which influence inbound traffic. Local Preference benefits include consistent outbound path selection across the AS, simple configuration compared to manipulating other attributes, and clear traffic engineering semantics. Organizations should document Local Preference policies, maintain consistency in value assignments, coordinate with AS Path prepending for comprehensive traffic engineering, and monitor traffic patterns validating preference effectiveness. Common issues include forgetting Local Preference only affects outbound paths, misconfiguring values causing unintended routing, or not propagating changes throughout iBGP mesh. Option A describes MED’s purpose for inbound traffic. Option C describes AS Path. Option D describes authentication mechanisms like MD5 or TCP AO.
Question 92
Which VLAN tagging standard does Junos support on EX Series switches?
A)1Q
B) ISL
C) LANE
D) MPLS
Answer: A
Explanation:
VLANs segment Layer 2 networks into broadcast domains. Understanding VLAN tagging standards ensures proper network design and interoperability. Junos on EX Series switches supports 802.1Q as the VLAN tagging standard, which is the IEEE standard for VLAN tagging on Ethernet networks. 802.1Q adds a 4-byte tag to Ethernet frames containing VLAN ID (12 bits supporting 4096 VLANs), priority (3 bits for QoS), and other fields. The standard defines trunk ports carrying multiple VLANs and access ports in single VLANs. 802.1Q characteristics include inserting tags after source MAC address in frames, using EtherType 0x8100 to identify tagged frames, supporting native VLAN for untagged traffic on trunks, and maintaining backward compatibility with untagged devices. Junos VLAN configuration includes defining VLANs with names and IDs, assigning interfaces as access or trunk, specifying allowed VLANs on trunks, and configuring native VLAN if needed. Interface modes include access for end devices in single VLAN, trunk carrying multiple VLANs with tags, and native-vlan-id for untagged traffic on trunks. Best practices recommend documenting VLAN assignments, using consistent VLAN IDs across infrastructure, limiting VLAN scope to minimize broadcast domains, implementing VLAN pruning on trunks for security and efficiency, and configuring appropriate native VLANs. Security considerations include VLAN hopping attacks through double tagging or switch spoofing, prevented by disabling DTP (in environments supporting it), configuring unused ports in isolated VLANs, and enabling security features. Interoperability with other vendors requires matching 802.1Q configuration, native VLAN settings, and allowed VLAN lists. Troubleshooting uses commands like “show vlans” displaying configured VLANs and member interfaces, “show ethernet-switching table” showing MAC address to VLAN mappings, and “show interfaces” verifying port VLAN assignments. Option B (ISL) is Cisco’s proprietary VLAN tagging now deprecated. Option C (LANE) is for ATM networks. Option D (MPLS) is Layer 3 VPN technology, not Layer 2 VLAN tagging.
Question 93
What is the default spanning tree protocol mode on Juniper EX Series switches?
A) STP (802.1D)
B) RSTP (802.1w)
C) MSTP (802.1s)
D) No spanning tree
Answer: B
Explanation:
Spanning tree protocols prevent Layer 2 loops in switched networks. Understanding default spanning tree configurations is important for network stability and design. The default spanning tree protocol mode on Juniper EX Series switches is RSTP (Rapid Spanning Tree Protocol, IEEE 802.1w), which provides faster convergence than original STP while maintaining backward compatibility. RSTP improves upon STP by achieving convergence in seconds rather than the 30-50 seconds STP requires. RSTP port states include discarding (blocking/disabled), learning, and forwarding, compared to STP’s five states. RSTP port roles include root port, designated port, alternate port (backup to root), and backup port (backup on same segment). RSTP uses proposal-agreement handshakes for rapid topology changes, edge port designation for end-device ports, and link-type (point-to-point or shared) determination. Configuration includes enabling spanning tree globally or per VLAN, setting bridge priority for root election, configuring edge ports for end devices, and setting link types. Operational commands include “show spanning-tree bridge” displaying bridge information and root election, “show spanning-tree interface” showing port states and roles, and “show spanning-tree statistics” displaying topology changes. Best practices recommend explicitly configuring root bridge through priority, enabling edge-port BPDU guard for security, disabling spanning tree only when certain no loops exist, and monitoring topology changes. Integration with other spanning tree modes supports STP for backward compatibility, MSTP for scaling with multiple spanning tree instances, and VSTP (VLAN Spanning Tree) for per-VLAN trees. Troubleshooting involves verifying expected root bridge, checking for unexpected topology changes, identifying blocked ports, and analyzing BPDU transmission. Organizations should design networks minimizing reliance on spanning tree, document spanning tree topology, implement monitoring for root changes, and plan convergence times. Option A (STP) is slower legacy protocol. Option C (MSTP) is available but not default. Option D is incorrect as default is RSTP enabled.
Question 94
Which Junos command configures a management IP address on an EX Series switch?
A) set interfaces me0 unit 0 family inet address
B) set system management ip
C) set mgmt0 address
D) set interface management address
Answer: A
Explanation:
Initial switch configuration requires setting management IP addresses for remote access. Understanding management interface configuration is fundamental for device deployment. The command “set interfaces me0 unit 0 family inet address <ip-address/mask>” configures a management IP address on Juniper EX Series switches using the dedicated out-of-band management interface. The me0 interface is a dedicated management Ethernet interface separate from data plane interfaces, providing out-of-band management access that continues functioning even during control plane issues. Configuration includes setting IP address and mask, optionally configuring default route for management traffic, and ensuring management VLAN or network connectivity. Complete management configuration typically includes “set interfaces me0 unit 0 family inet address 192.168.1.1/24”, “set routing-options static route 0.0.0.0/0 next-hop 192.168.1.254” for default route via management network, and services like SSH enabled through “set system services ssh”. Management interface benefits include isolated management traffic from production, consistent access during network issues, and simplified troubleshooting. Alternative management approaches include in-band management using VLAN interfaces configured with “set interfaces vlan unit <vlan-id> family inet address”, shared management through IRB interfaces, and console access as fallback. Best practices recommend dedicating me0 for management, implementing access control through firewalls or filters, using secure protocols like SSH, documenting management IP schema, and maintaining out-of-band access for emergencies. Security considerations include restricting management access to specific source networks, enabling authentication mechanisms, using encrypted protocols, and monitoring management interface access. Troubleshooting management connectivity involves verifying physical connectivity, checking IP configuration with “show interfaces me0”, testing routing with “ping” and “traceroute” from management interface, and reviewing security policies. Organizations should maintain current management IP documentation, implement change control for management configurations, and ensure redundant management access methods. Option B, C, and D represent incorrect command syntax that doesn’t match Junos CLI structure for interface configuration.
Question 95
What is the purpose of link aggregation (LAG) on Juniper switches?
A) Reduce power consumption
B) Combine multiple physical links into a single logical link for increased bandwidth and redundancy
C) Encrypt traffic between switches
D) Segment broadcast domains
Answer: B
Explanation:
Link aggregation combines multiple physical connections into logical bundles, providing increased capacity and redundancy. Understanding LAG is essential for resilient network design. Link aggregation combines multiple physical links into a single logical link providing increased bandwidth through load distribution and redundancy through automatic failover when member links fail. Junos implements link aggregation through aggregated Ethernet (ae) interfaces following IEEE 802.3ad Link Aggregation Control Protocol (LACP) or static configuration. LACP dynamically manages bundle membership, detects failures, and synchronizes configuration between devices. Benefits include bandwidth aggregation multiplying available capacity, redundancy maintaining connectivity during link failures, load distribution spreading traffic across members, simplified configuration treating bundle as single logical interface, and spanning tree optimization as STP sees bundle as single link. Configuration involves creating ae interface with “set interfaces ae0 aggregated-ether-options”, adding member interfaces through “set interfaces ge-0/0/0 ether-options 802.3ad ae0”, enabling LACP with “set interfaces ae0 aggregated-ether-options lacp active”, and applying logical configuration to ae interface. Load balancing algorithms distribute traffic including layer-2 hashing based on MAC addresses, layer-3 hashing using IP addresses, layer-3-and-4 using IP and transport layer ports, or other methods. Selection affects traffic distribution efficiency. Best practices recommend using LACP for dynamic membership management, configuring consistent link speeds for all members, implementing even member counts for optimal balancing, documenting bundle membership, and monitoring bundle health. Troubleshooting uses “show interfaces ae0” displaying bundle status, “show lacp interfaces” showing LACP negotiation, and “show interfaces statistics ae0” monitoring traffic distribution. Common issues include LACP misconfiguration preventing bundle formation, mismatched link speeds causing suboptimal operation, and single-link failures going undetected without monitoring. Organizations should design LAG for critical uplinks, validate failover behavior, trend capacity utilization, and plan for degraded capacity during link failures. Option A describes unrelated power management. Option C describes encryption like MACsec. Option D describes VLANs.
Question 96
Which Junos feature provides network access control based on user authentication?
A) VLAN
B) ACL
C)1X
D) QoS
Answer: C
Explanation:
Network access control authenticates users before granting network access. Understanding 802.1X ensures secure network deployments. Juniper switches support 802.1X port-based network access control authenticating users before allowing network access, providing security for wired and wireless networks. 802.1X architecture includes supplicant (client software on end devices), authenticator (network switch controlling access), and authentication server (typically RADIUS server storing credentials). The process involves client connecting to switch port initiating authentication, switch blocking traffic except 802.1X authentication frames, supplicant and RADIUS server exchanging credentials via switch, RADIUS server validating credentials and returning authorization, and switch granting or denying access based on RADIUS response. Configuration includes enabling 802.1X globally with authentication-order radius, configuring RADIUS server parameters including IP address and shared secret, enabling 802.1X on interfaces with server-fail permit or deny, and setting authentication mode (single for one device per port, multiple for multiple devices, or MAC RADIUS for non-supplicant devices). Additional options include guest VLAN for unauthenticated devices allowing limited access, authentication bypass for devices without supplicants like printers, dynamic VLAN assignment based on RADIUS attributes, and reauthentication intervals for ongoing validation. Benefits include user-based access control rather than port-based, dynamic policy application based on identity, centralized authentication management, visibility into network users, integration with identity management systems, and audit capabilities tracking access. Deployment considerations include supplicant requirements on endpoints, RADIUS server infrastructure, fallback mechanisms for authentication failures, handling non-supplicant devices, voice VLAN configuration for IP phones, and monitoring authentication events. Troubleshooting uses “show dot1x interface” displaying authentication status, “show dot1x statistics” monitoring authentication attempts, and authentication logs. Organizations should implement 802.1X for securing network access, integrate with existing identity systems, plan for device exceptions, test thoroughly before deployment, and monitor authentication logs for anomalies. Option A (VLAN) provides network segmentation, not authentication. Option B (ACL) filters traffic based on criteria, not user authentication. Option D (QoS) manages traffic prioritization, not access control.
Question 97
What is the purpose of IGMP snooping on Juniper switches?
A) Monitor SNMP traffic
B) Constrain multicast traffic to ports with interested receivers
C) Authenticate IGMP messages
D) Encrypt multicast traffic
Answer: B
Explanation:
Multicast traffic requires efficient delivery mechanisms to avoid unnecessary flooding. Understanding IGMP snooping optimizes multicast performance and reduces bandwidth consumption. IGMP snooping constrains multicast traffic to ports with interested receivers by monitoring IGMP messages exchanged between hosts and multicast routers, building a forwarding table of which ports need which multicast groups. Without snooping, switches flood multicast traffic to all ports like unknown unicast, wasting bandwidth and impacting non-interested hosts. IGMP snooping operates by listening to IGMP membership reports from hosts joining groups, tracking membership queries from multicast routers, maintaining group-to-port mappings, forwarding multicast data only to interested ports plus router ports, and removing entries when hosts leave groups or timeouts expire. The feature operates at Layer 2, examining Layer 3 IGMP messages without participating in IGMP protocol itself. Configuration includes enabling snooping globally or per VLAN, configuring querier election if no multicast router exists, setting aging timers for membership, and optionally enabling fast-leave for immediate removal. Benefits include reduced bandwidth consumption by eliminating unnecessary flooding, improved network efficiency, better host performance avoiding irrelevant traffic processing, and multicast scalability in large switched environments. Snooping interacts with other features including multicast routing determining source of IGMP queries, VLANs with per-VLAN snooping tables, and port security requiring coordination. Operational commands include “show igmp snooping membership” displaying group memberships per port, “show igmp snooping statistics” monitoring snooping activity, and “show igmp snooping database” showing complete forwarding table. Troubleshooting involves verifying snooping enabled, checking for multicast router ports, validating IGMP version compatibility, and monitoring join/leave messages. Organizations should enable snooping in multicast environments, configure appropriate timers, designate queriers in router-less VLANs, and monitor multicast traffic patterns. Option A misinterprets snooping as SNMP monitoring. Option C describes security features not related to snooping’s forwarding optimization purpose. Option D describes encryption rather than efficient forwarding.
Question 98
Which virtual chassis technology component elects the master RE (Routing Engine)?
A) Lowest MAC address
B) Master election priority and uptime
C) Random selection
D) First device powered on
Answer: B
Explanation:
Virtual Chassis combines multiple physical switches into a single logical switch. Understanding master election ensures predictable and stable virtual chassis operations. Virtual Chassis master RE election uses master election priority and uptime to determine which member becomes the master routing engine managing the entire chassis. Election process considers priority values where higher priority wins (configurable 0-255, default varies), existing master status where current master wins ties to minimize disruptions, uptime where longer uptime wins if priorities equal, and member ID as final tiebreaker with lower IDs preferred. Administrators should explicitly configure priorities ensuring desired master election rather than relying on defaults. Primary master handles all control plane functions including routing protocol processing, forwarding table calculation, configuration management, and monitoring. Backup master (if configured) maintains synchronized state for rapid failover. Election occurs during initial formation, when members join/leave, or when current master fails. Configuration includes setting mastership priority with “set virtual-chassis member <id> mastership-priority <value>”, configuring backup master with “set virtual-chassis member <id> role routing-engine”, and setting member IDs with “request virtual-chassis renumber member-id <old-id> new-id <new-id>”. Best practices recommend explicitly configuring priorities, designating primary and backup masters, using higher-capacity devices as masters due to control plane load, documenting election strategy, and testing failover scenarios. Virtual Chassis provides benefits including simplified management of multiple switches, unified configuration, consistent software versions, and seamless redundancy. Troubleshooting uses “show virtual-chassis status” displaying member roles and election information, “show virtual-chassis protocol” showing protocol adjacencies, and logs tracking election events. Organizations should plan Virtual Chassis design including member roles, size appropriately for control plane capacity, implement redundancy, validate failover behavior, and monitor Virtual Chassis health. Election must be deterministic and stable to prevent split-brain scenarios or frequent re-elections disrupting operations. Option A describes one possible tiebreaker but not the primary election mechanism. Options C and D are incorrect as election follows defined priority-based deterministic process.
Question 99
What is the default port speed auto-negotiation behavior on Juniper EX switches?
A) Always disabled
B) Enabled by default on most interfaces
C) Manual configuration required for all ports
D) Only works on fiber ports
Answer: B
Explanation:
Interface speed and duplex configuration affects connectivity and performance. Understanding auto-negotiation default behavior ensures proper network operation. Auto-negotiation is enabled by default on most interfaces on Juniper EX switches, automatically determining speed and duplex settings between connected devices. Auto-negotiation follows IEEE 802.3u standards where devices exchange capabilities, select highest common speed and duplex, and configure interfaces accordingly. The process prevents speed/duplex mismatches causing performance problems like frame loss, CRC errors, or connection failures. Default behavior varies slightly by interface type where copper interfaces (10/100/1000BASE-T) typically default to auto-negotiation enabled, fiber interfaces may default to fixed speed depending on optics, and management interfaces often default to auto-negotiation. Configuration allows explicit settings through “set interfaces ge-0/0/0 speed <speed>”, “set interfaces ge-0/0/0 link-mode <full-duplex|half-duplex>”, or disabling auto-negotiation with “delete interfaces ge-0/0/0 speed” to re-enable auto. Best practices recommend allowing auto-negotiation for end-device connections ensuring compatibility, configuring fixed speed/duplex on inter-switch links for consistency and avoiding negotiation delays, matching settings on both ends of point-to-point links, and documenting any non-default configurations. Speed/duplex mismatches are common issues causing degraded performance, detected through duplex mismatch on one side, collision and error counters incrementing, and slow throughput. Troubleshooting uses “show interfaces ge-0/0/0” displaying configured and operational speed/duplex, “show interfaces diagnostics optics” for fiber interface capabilities, and interface statistics showing errors. Organizations should establish standards for auto-negotiation usage, configure consistently for link types, monitor for mismatches, and validate configurations during deployment. Some specialty connections like server NICs or storage devices may require specific speed/duplex settings. Modern networks primarily use auto-negotiation for flexibility and compatibility, with fixed configuration reserved for specific requirements or troubleshooting. Option A is incorrect as default is typically enabled. Option C is incorrect as auto-negotiation works by default without manual configuration. Option D is incorrect as copper interfaces commonly use auto-negotiation; fiber interfaces depend on optic types.
Question 100
Which command verifies the operational status of all interfaces on a Juniper switch?
A) show interfaces terse
B) show status
C) show ports
D) display interface
Answer: A
Explanation:
Monitoring interface status is fundamental for network operations and troubleshooting. Understanding verification commands enables rapid assessment of network health. The command “show interfaces terse” verifies operational status of all interfaces on a Juniper switch, providing concise summary output including interface name, administrative status, link status, protocol status, and IP addresses. The terse output format displays one line per logical interface, making it ideal for quickly scanning many interfaces. Output fields include interface name (ge-0/0/0.0, ae0.0, etc.), Admin state showing configured status (up if enabled, down if disabled), Link state showing physical layer status (up if connected, down if no link), Proto indicating protocol status for logical interfaces, and addresses showing configured IPs. This command is typically the first verification step when troubleshooting connectivity, as it quickly identifies down interfaces, administrative shutdowns, or missing configurations. Alternative detail levels include “show interfaces” providing detailed output for each interface including statistics and configuration, “show interfaces <interface>” showing specific interface details, “show interfaces extensive” displaying comprehensive information including error counters and capabilities, and “show interfaces descriptions” showing configured interface descriptions. Common operational states include admin up/link up indicating normal operation, admin up/link down suggesting physical layer issues like cable problems or remote device down, admin down showing intentional disable, and protocol up/down indicating Layer 3 status. Interpreting these states helps isolate issues to proper layer. Organizations should regularly monitor interface status, establish baselines for normal operations, alert on unexpected down interfaces, document expected interface states, and include interface checks in troubleshooting procedures. Interface monitoring integrates with network management systems for centralized visibility. Status changes often indicate hardware failures, configuration changes, or network events requiring investigation. The terse view efficiently presents information for operators managing many interfaces, while detailed views support deep troubleshooting. Option B, C, and D don’t represent valid Junos commands for interface status verification.
