Visit here for our full Amazon AWS Certified Developer – Associate DVA-C02 exam dumps and practice test questions.
Question 21
A developer is building a serverless application using AWS Lambda that processes images uploaded to an S3 bucket. The Lambda function needs to be triggered automatically when new images are uploaded. Which AWS service integration should be configured to invoke the Lambda function?
A) Amazon CloudWatch Events rule
B) S3 event notification with Lambda trigger
C) Amazon SQS queue polling
D) AWS Step Functions state machine
Answer: B)
Explanation:
S3 event notification with Lambda trigger provides direct integration where S3 automatically invokes the Lambda function when specific events occur in the bucket, such as object creation, deletion, or modification. This serverless architecture enables event-driven processing without requiring polling or intermediate services. S3 event notifications support multiple event types including s3:ObjectCreated for any creation method like PUT, POST, or COPY operations, s3:ObjectRemoved for deletions, and s3:ObjectRestore for Glacier restore completions. When configuring the trigger, developers specify event type, optional prefix or suffix filters to limit which objects trigger the function, and the target Lambda function ARN. For example, filtering by suffix “.jpg” ensures only JPEG images trigger processing. The integration is asynchronous where S3 invokes Lambda and doesn’t wait for completion, suitable for time-consuming operations like image processing. Lambda receives event data containing bucket name, object key, size, and metadata enabling the function to retrieve and process the object. Best practices include implementing idempotency because S3 may occasionally invoke functions multiple times for the same event, using S3 object metadata or DynamoDB to track processed items, implementing error handling with retries for transient failures, and configuring dead letter queues to capture failed invocations for later analysis. Lambda execution role requires permissions including s3:GetObject to retrieve uploaded images and any additional permissions for operations like writing processed images back to S3 or storing metadata in DynamoDB. For high-volume scenarios, consider using S3 Event Notifications to SQS with Lambda polling the queue for better control over concurrency and retry behavior. Option A, CloudWatch Events, can trigger Lambda on schedules but doesn’t directly respond to S3 uploads. Option C adds unnecessary complexity with queue management. Option D, Step Functions, orchestrates workflows but isn’t the trigger mechanism itself.
Question 22
A developer needs to store user session data for a web application with fast read and write performance. The data should expire automatically after 30 minutes of inactivity. Which AWS service is most appropriate for this use case?
A) Amazon RDS MySQL database
B) Amazon DynamoDB with TTL
C) Amazon ElastiCache Redis
D) Amazon S3 with lifecycle policies
Answer: C)
Explanation:
Amazon ElastiCache Redis provides in-memory data storage with microsecond latency for read and write operations, supporting automatic expiration of keys through built-in TTL (Time To Live) functionality ideal for session management. Session data requires fast access because it’s retrieved on every user request, and automatic expiration ensures inactive sessions are cleaned up without manual intervention. Redis offers several features beneficial for session storage including in-memory performance delivering sub-millisecond response times critical for user experience, data structures supporting strings, hashes, lists, and sets enabling flexible session data modeling, automatic expiration where TTL can be set per key causing automatic deletion after specified duration, persistence options allowing optional data durability through snapshots or append-only files if needed, and replication providing high availability through primary-replica configuration. For session management, typical implementation stores session ID as Redis key with session data as value, setting TTL to session timeout duration like 1800 seconds for 30 minutes. Each user request refreshes the TTL, extending the session lifetime, while inactive sessions automatically expire and are removed from memory. Redis cluster mode enables scaling to millions of sessions across multiple nodes. Integration with applications uses ElastiCache client libraries in various languages implementing connection pooling for efficiency. Security considerations include deploying ElastiCache within VPC for network isolation, enabling encryption in transit using TLS, and enabling encryption at rest for compliance requirements. Authentication uses Redis AUTH command or IAM authentication for access control. Option B, DynamoDB with TTL, provides automatic expiration but with eventual consistency and higher latency than in-memory cache, suitable for less latency-sensitive data. Option A, RDS, provides durability but lacks the performance and automatic expiration simplicity needed for sessions. Option D, S3, is object storage inappropriate for session data requiring frequent updates and immediate consistency. ElastiCache Redis specifically addresses session management requirements with optimal performance and built-in expiration mechanisms.
Question 23
A developer is implementing a REST API using Amazon API Gateway that needs to validate incoming request parameters before invoking the backend Lambda function. Which API Gateway feature should be configured to perform request validation?
A) Lambda authorizer function
B) Request validator with JSON schema
C) API Gateway mapping templates
D) Resource policy restrictions
Answer: B)
Explanation:
Request validator with JSON schema enables API Gateway to validate request parameters, headers, and body against defined schemas before invoking backend services, rejecting invalid requests immediately without consuming Lambda invocations or backend resources. This validation improves security, reduces backend load, and provides faster feedback to clients. API Gateway supports multiple validation types including request body validation ensuring JSON or XML payloads conform to defined schema structure and data types, query string parameter validation verifying required parameters are present and match expected types, and request header validation checking required headers exist. Validation configuration involves defining JSON Schema Draft 4 specifying required properties, data types, string patterns using regex, numeric ranges, array constraints, and nested object structures. For example, a user registration schema might require email matching email format, password with minimum length, and age as integer between 13 and 120. The request validator configuration has three modes: validate body only checking request payload, validate query string parameters and headers, or validate both body and parameters. When validation fails, API Gateway returns 400 Bad Request with error details describing which validation rules failed, preventing invalid requests from reaching Lambda and consuming execution time and cost. This front-end validation complements backend validation where API Gateway handles format and structure while Lambda implements business logic validation. JSON schema supports advanced features including enum for allowed values, pattern for regex matching, format for common types like email, URI, or date-time, and conditional validation using if/then/else constructs. Integration with OpenAPI specifications allows importing validation schemas directly from API definitions maintaining consistency between documentation and runtime validation. Best practices include defining comprehensive schemas covering all expected inputs, using descriptive validation messages for client debugging, testing validation rules thoroughly including edge cases, and versioning schemas alongside API versions. Option A, Lambda authorizer, handles authentication and authorization but not request format validation. Option C, mapping templates, transform requests but don’t validate. Option D, resource policies, control access permissions not request validation. Request validators specifically address input validation requirements efficiently at the API Gateway layer.
Question 24
A developer needs to deploy a containerized application that requires persistent storage for database files. The storage must be accessible from multiple container instances. Which AWS service combination should be used?
A) Amazon ECS with EBS volumes
B) Amazon ECS with EFS file system
C) Amazon ECS with S3 bucket mounting
D) Amazon ECS with instance store
Answer: B)
Explanation:
Amazon ECS with EFS file system provides persistent, shared storage accessible from multiple container instances simultaneously, supporting use cases where containers need shared access to data like database files, application state, or content repositories. EFS is a fully managed NFS file system offering elastic capacity that grows and shrinks automatically, supporting thousands of concurrent connections from ECS tasks across multiple availability zones. The integration involves creating an EFS file system with mount targets in VPC subnets where ECS tasks run, configuring ECS task definitions to mount the EFS volume using volume configuration specifying file system ID and mount options, and defining container mount points mapping EFS volumes to container paths. Multiple containers in different tasks can mount the same EFS file system enabling data sharing and persistence beyond container lifecycle. EFS provides file system semantics including hierarchical directory structure, file locking for concurrent access coordination, and POSIX permissions for access control. Performance modes include General Purpose for latency-sensitive workloads and Max I/O for highly parallel workloads with aggregate throughput requirements. Throughput modes offer Bursting providing throughput scaled to storage size, or Provisioned allowing specification of throughput independent of storage size. Storage classes include Standard for frequently accessed data and Infrequent Access for cost optimization of rarely accessed files with automatic lifecycle management. Security features include encryption at rest using KMS keys, encryption in transit with TLS, VPC network isolation, and access control through security groups and IAM policies. For database workloads specifically, consider that while EFS works for databases requiring shared access like content management systems, high-performance transactional databases may prefer EBS volumes offering lower latency and higher IOPS. Option A, EBS volumes, provide persistent storage but are attached to single EC2 instances preventing multi-container shared access. Option C, S3 mounting, requires third-party tools and doesn’t provide file system semantics needed by databases. Option D, instance store, is ephemeral storage lost when instances terminate. EFS specifically addresses requirements for persistent, shared storage across multiple containers with native ECS integration.
Question 25
A developer is building a web application that needs to store and retrieve user profile images. The images should be publicly accessible via HTTPS and automatically deleted after 90 days. Which AWS solution meets these requirements?
A) Amazon EBS snapshots with manual deletion
B) Amazon S3 with bucket policy and lifecycle policy
C) Amazon EFS with cron job deletion
D) Amazon DynamoDB with binary data
Answer: B)
Explanation:
Amazon S3 with bucket policy and lifecycle policy provides scalable object storage for images with built-in features for public access control and automatic expiration meeting all requirements without custom code. S3 is designed for storing and retrieving any amount of data from anywhere on the web with high durability and availability. The solution architecture involves creating an S3 bucket with appropriate configuration, implementing bucket policy granting public read access to objects, configuring lifecycle policy to automatically delete objects after 90 days, and optionally using CloudFront for content delivery with caching and HTTPS. Bucket policy uses JSON-based access policy Security best practices include using bucket policies rather than ACLs for access control, blocking public access at account level by default and explicitly allowing only specific buckets, implementing least privilege where only necessary objects are public, and enabling server access logging for audit trails. Lifecycle policies automate object management based on age or other criteria, defining rules that transition objects between storage classes or expire them. For automatic deletion after 90 days, create expiration rule specifying 90-day threshold after which objects are permanently deleted. Lifecycle policies operate asynchronously typically within 24-48 hours of meeting criteria. Additional S3 features beneficial for this use case include versioning enabling recovery of accidentally deleted images, server-side encryption protecting data at rest, CORS configuration allowing web applications to access images cross-origin, and object metadata for storing additional information like content type and cache control headers. For serving images to end users, CloudFront distribution improves performance through edge caching, reduces origin load, provides DDoS protection, and enables custom domain names with SSL certificates. Option A, EBS snapshots, are for block storage backups not directly accessible via HTTPS. Option C, EFS, requires mounting and custom deletion scripts. Option D, DynamoDB, is designed for structured data not large binary objects. S3 specifically addresses static content storage with built-in web access and lifecycle management features.
Question 26
A developer needs to implement authentication for a mobile application using social identity providers like Facebook and Google. Which AWS service provides federated identity management with minimal custom code?
A) AWS IAM users and groups
B) Amazon Cognito User Pools with identity providers
C) AWS STS with SAML federation
D) Custom Lambda authorizer implementation
Answer: B)
Explanation:
Amazon Cognito User Pools with identity providers enables federated authentication where users sign in through social identity providers like Facebook, Google, Amazon, or Apple, with Cognito managing token exchange and user profile creation automatically. User Pools is a fully managed user directory supporting user registration, authentication, and account management at scale. Federated identity integration involves configuring identity provider settings including client ID and secret obtained from provider’s developer console, mapping provider attributes to User Pool attributes for profile data like email and name, and implementing sign-in flow in the application using Cognito SDKs or hosted UI. The authentication process flows as follows: users select social provider for login, Cognito redirects to provider’s authentication page, user authenticates with provider credentials, provider redirects back to Cognito with authorization code, Cognito exchanges code for tokens from provider, Cognito creates or updates User Pool user profile, and Cognito returns JWT tokens to application for authenticated access. The JWT tokens include ID token containing user identity claims, access token for API authorization, and refresh token for obtaining new tokens when expired. User Pools maintains user records regardless of authentication method, unifying social and username/password users in single directory. Additional features include multi-factor authentication for enhanced security, password policies for local users, account verification via email or SMS, user attributes for profile information, groups for user organization, and triggers using Lambda functions for custom workflows like pre-authentication validation or post-confirmation processing. Integration with AWS services uses Cognito groups mapped to IAM roles granting AWS resource access, or API Gateway using Cognito User Pool authorizer for REST API authentication. For mobile applications specifically, Cognito provides native SDKs for iOS, Android, and React Native handling authentication flows, token management, and credential storage securely. Best practices include implementing token refresh logic before expiration, storing tokens securely using platform-specific secure storage, handling authentication errors gracefully, and implementing sign-out functionality clearing tokens. Option A, IAM users, are for AWS console and CLI access not application users. Option C, STS SAML, is for enterprise federation not social providers. Option D, custom implementation, requires significant development effort that Cognito eliminates. Cognito User Pools specifically address social authentication requirements with minimal code.
Question 27
A developer is implementing a microservices architecture where services need to communicate asynchronously. Messages should be processed exactly once and in the order they were sent. Which AWS messaging service configuration ensures FIFO ordering?
A) Amazon SNS standard topic
B) Amazon SQS standard queue
C) Amazon SQS FIFO queue with message groups
D) Amazon Kinesis Data Streams
Answer: C)
Explanation:
Amazon SQS FIFO queue with message groups provides exactly-once processing and strict ordering guarantees essential for workflows requiring message sequence preservation like order processing or financial transactions. FIFO queues ensure messages are processed in the exact order they are sent and each message is delivered once with no duplicates. The queue naming requires .fifo suffix identifying it as FIFO type. Message groups are key to FIFO functionality where messages with the same message group ID are processed in order relative to each other, while messages with different group IDs can be processed in parallel enabling throughput scaling. For example, order processing might use customer ID as message group ID ensuring all orders for a customer are processed sequentially while different customers’ orders process concurrently. This provides ordering within logical groups without sacrificing all parallelism. FIFO queues use deduplication to prevent duplicate messages through either content-based deduplication where SQS generates deduplication ID from message body hash, or message deduplication ID explicitly set by sender. Messages with duplicate deduplication IDs within 5-minute window are rejected as duplicates. Throughput for FIFO queues is 300 messages per second without batching or 3000 with batching, sufficient for many workloads but lower than standard queues’ unlimited throughput. Message attributes allow attaching metadata without affecting body, useful for filtering and routing decisions. Visibility timeout prevents other consumers from processing messages being worked on, with receive message call making messages invisible to other consumers until timeout expires or message is deleted. Dead letter queues capture messages that fail processing repeatedly after maxReceiveCount attempts, enabling error analysis and manual intervention. Long polling reduces costs and latency by waiting up to 20 seconds for messages rather than immediately returning empty if queue is empty. Integration with Lambda enables event-driven processing where Lambda polls queue and invokes function with message batches, automatically deleting successfully processed messages and returning failures to queue for retry. Best practices include setting message group IDs appropriately balancing ordering requirements with parallelism, implementing idempotent processing since exactly-once delivery is at-least-once after visibility timeout, using exponential backoff for retries, and monitoring queue metrics like age of oldest message and approximate number of messages visible. Option A, SNS, provides pub/sub not queueing. Option B, standard queue, doesn’t guarantee ordering. Option D, Kinesis, provides ordering but with different consumption model. FIFO queues specifically address strict ordering requirements with exactly-once delivery semantics.
Question 28
A developer needs to execute long-running data processing tasks that can take several hours to complete. The solution should be cost-effective and automatically scale based on workload. Which AWS compute service is most appropriate?
A) AWS Lambda functions
B) Amazon ECS with Fargate Spot
C) Amazon EC2 On-Demand instances
D) AWS Elastic Beanstalk
Answer: B)
Explanation:
Amazon ECS with Fargate Spot provides cost-effective container execution for long-running tasks with automatic scaling and serverless infrastructure management. Fargate eliminates the need to provision and manage EC2 instances, allowing developers to focus on containerization and application logic. Fargate Spot offers up to 70% cost savings compared to Fargate pricing by utilizing spare AWS compute capacity, ideal for fault-tolerant and flexible workloads like batch processing, data processing, and CI/CD jobs. ECS manages task scheduling, scaling, and lifecycle with tasks running until completion regardless of duration. The architecture involves defining ECS task definitions specifying container image, CPU and memory requirements, environment variables, and IAM role for AWS service access. Task definitions declare container configuration including Docker image from ECR or Docker Hub, resource limits, logging configuration using CloudWatch Logs, and volume mounts for persistent storage if needed. ECS services or standalone tasks execute the processing workload where services maintain desired count of running tasks with automatic replacement of failed tasks, while standalone tasks run until completion without automatic restart. Fargate Spot tasks may be interrupted with 2-minute warning when capacity is needed, requiring applications to handle graceful shutdown and checkpoint progress for resumption. Fault tolerance strategies include saving state to S3 or DynamoDB periodically, using SQS for work distribution enabling resume from any point, and implementing idempotent operations allowing safe restarts. Scaling is achieved through ECS service auto scaling based on CloudWatch metrics like CPU utilization or custom metrics, or by launching tasks programmatically via API calls from Lambda or Step Functions. Cost optimization combines Fargate Spot for majority of capacity with Fargate On-Demand for critical tasks requiring guaranteed completion. Integration with other services includes S3 for input/output data, DynamoDB for state management, and CloudWatch for monitoring and logging. Container best practices include using multi-stage builds for minimal image sizes, implementing health checks for service availability, and following 12-factor app principles. Option A, Lambda, has 15-minute execution time limit inappropriate for hour-long tasks. Option C, EC2, requires more management overhead than Fargate. Option D, Elastic Beanstalk, is for web applications not batch processing. ECS with Fargate Spot specifically addresses long-running batch workload requirements with cost efficiency and automatic scaling.
Question 29
A developer is building a serverless API that needs to execute different Lambda functions based on the HTTP method and resource path. Which API Gateway integration type provides the most flexibility for routing requests?
A) Lambda proxy integration
B) Lambda custom integration
C) HTTP proxy integration
D) AWS service integration
Answer: A)
Explanation:
Lambda proxy integration provides the most flexibility by passing the entire HTTP request including method, path, query parameters, headers, and body directly to Lambda as event data, allowing Lambda functions to implement routing logic and return properly formatted HTTP responses. This integration simplifies API development by minimizing API Gateway configuration and moving logic into Lambda code. The event structure contains requestContext with request ID, account ID, and API ID, httpMethod indicating GET, POST, PUT, DELETE or other HTTP method, path showing the resource path, pathParameters for path variables, queryStringParameters as key-value object, headers containing request headers, body with request payload as string, and isBase64Encoded flag for binary content. Lambda functions parse this event, implement routing logic, execute appropriate business logic, and return response objects containing statusCode, headers, body, and optionally isBase64Encoded. This response structure maps directly to HTTP response sent to client. Routing patterns within Lambda use HTTP method and path from event to determine processing logic, implementing switch statements or router libraries for clean code organization. For example, GET /users/{id} retrieves user by ID while POST /users creates new user, both handled by same Lambda with internal routing. Benefits include single Lambda handling multiple routes reducing function proliferation, simplified API Gateway configuration with fewer resources and methods, flexible request processing with access to all request details, and easier testing since Lambda can be invoked directly with mock events. Considerations include Lambda timeout limits where all routes share 15-minute maximum, cold starts affecting latency for infrequently accessed routes, and code organization required to maintain clean routing logic as API grows. Best practices include implementing centralized error handling, validating inputs, using middleware patterns for cross-cutting concerns like authentication, and extracting shared logic into helper functions or layers. For very large APIs, consider splitting into multiple Lambda functions by domain or functionality to maintain manageable function size and separate deployment. Option B, custom integration, requires extensive mapping templates. Option C, HTTP proxy, forwards to HTTP endpoints not Lambda. Option D, service integration, integrates with AWS services directly. Lambda proxy integration specifically provides the flexibility needed for Lambda-based API routing with minimal configuration overhead.
Question 30
A developer needs to debug a Lambda function that is timing out when processing S3 events. Which combination of tools and settings will help identify the performance bottleneck?
A) Increase memory allocation and review CloudWatch Logs
B) Enable VPC Flow Logs only
C) Configure X-Ray tracing and analyze service map
D) Both A and C for comprehensive analysis
Answer: D)
Explanation:
Both increasing memory allocation with CloudWatch Logs review and enabling X-Ray tracing provide comprehensive analysis capabilities for identifying Lambda performance bottlenecks. Memory allocation directly impacts Lambda performance because CPU power scales with allocated memory, so memory-bound or CPU-intensive operations benefit from higher memory allocation potentially reducing execution time below timeout threshold. Lambda pricing is based on GB-seconds, so while higher memory costs more per millisecond, reduced execution time may result in lower overall cost. CloudWatch Logs capture console output from print or logging statements in Lambda code, showing execution flow, timing of operations, and error messages. Strategic logging includes timestamps before and after expensive operations like S3 GetObject calls, database queries, or external API requests, revealing which operations consume most execution time. CloudWatch Logs Insights enables querying logs with SQL-like syntax to analyze patterns across multiple invocations. X-Ray tracing provides distributed tracing showing request flow through AWS services with timing for each segment. For Lambda processing S3 events, X-Ray traces show S3 event delivery time, Lambda initialization and execution time, downstream service calls like S3 GetObject or DynamoDB PutItem with individual durations, and errors or throttling issues. Service map visualizes dependencies showing if bottlenecks are in Lambda itself or downstream services. X-Ray segments and subsegments break down execution into logical units revealing specifically which operations are slow. Annotations and metadata add custom data to traces for filtering and analysis. Combined approach workflow involves enabling X-Ray tracing in Lambda configuration adding required permissions to execution role, adding X-Ray SDK to function code for custom instrumentation if needed, adding detailed CloudWatch logging around suspected bottleneck operations, executing function under realistic conditions, analyzing X-Ray traces for overall timing and service-level insights, and reviewing CloudWatch Logs for detailed execution flow. Common bottlenecks include network latency from VPC configuration if Lambda isn’t using VPC endpoints, S3 GetObject duration for large objects suggesting need for streaming or partial reads, external API calls that are slow or timing out, inefficient code like nested loops or unnecessary processing, and cold start overhead for infrequently invoked functions. Solutions might include optimizing code, increasing memory, using provisioned concurrency for predictable latency, implementing caching, or architectural changes like processing S3 objects in chunks. The combination provides both high-level distributed tracing and detailed code-level logging for comprehensive troubleshooting.
Question 31
A developer is implementing a DynamoDB table for a e-commerce application that needs to query orders by customer ID and by order status. Which DynamoDB schema design best supports both access patterns efficiently?
A) Single table with customer ID as partition key and order ID as sort key
B) Single table with composite key and global secondary index
C) Separate tables for each access pattern
D) Single table with scan operations and filters
Answer: B)
Explanation:
Single table with composite primary key and global secondary index (GSI) efficiently supports multiple access patterns without duplicating data or requiring expensive scan operations. DynamoDB performance depends on appropriate key design because queries must specify partition key for efficiency. The base table design uses customer ID as partition key and order ID as sort key enabling efficient queries for all orders by specific customer using Query operation specifying customer ID, retrieving in order ID sequence. This access pattern supports viewing customer order history. For the second access pattern querying by order status, create GSI with order status as partition key and timestamp or order ID as sort key, enabling queries for all orders with specific status like “pending” or “shipped” for operational workflows. GSIs are automatically maintained by DynamoDB with eventual consistency, containing projected attributes needed for queries. Attribute projection options include KEYS_ONLY projecting only index keys, INCLUDE projecting specified non-key attributes, or ALL projecting all attributes. For this use case, projecting all attributes eliminates need for table queries after index lookup. GSI capacity is independent of base table allowing separate throughput allocation. Best practices include keeping GSI count low since each index doubles write costs, choosing high-cardinality partition keys distributing data evenly, projecting only needed attributes reducing storage costs, and monitoring GSI throttling separately from base table. Alternatively, composite sort key patterns enable multiple access patterns in single table using generic attribute names like PK and SK with item type prefixes, though this requires understanding advanced single-table design. For example, PK=”CUSTOMER#123″, SK=”ORDER#456″ for customer-order relationship, and creating GSI with SK as partition key and PK as sort key inverting the relationship. This technique supports unlimited access patterns with strategic GSI design. The query operation uses KeyConditionExpression specifying partition key equality and optional sort key condition, returning items efficiently without scanning entire table. FilterExpression can further refine results but applies after reading items affecting costs. Option A supports only customer queries efficiently. Option C creates data duplication and synchronization challenges. Option D uses scan operations reading entire table inefficiently with high costs and poor performance. Proper DynamoDB design with composite keys and GSIs specifically addresses multiple access pattern requirements efficiently.
Question 32
A developer is implementing CI/CD pipeline using AWS CodePipeline for a Node.js application. The build stage needs to run unit tests and create a deployment artifact. Which AWS service should be used for the build stage?
A) AWS CodeDeploy
B) AWS CodeBuild
C) AWS Lambda
D) Amazon EC2 build servers
Answer: B)
Explanation:
AWS CodeBuild is a fully managed build service that compiles source code, runs unit tests, and produces deployment artifacts as part of CI/CD pipelines. CodeBuild eliminates the need to provision and manage build servers, automatically scaling to handle multiple builds concurrently. The service uses build specification files defining build phases, commands, and artifact locations. For Node.js applications, buildspec.yml defines phases including install for installing dependencies like npm packages, pre_build for setup tasks like linting or environment configuration, build for compiling code and running tests, and post_build for packaging artifacts or cleanup. Each phase contains commands executed in Linux container environment with build project specifying Docker image providing runtime environment. AWS maintains curated images for common runtimes including Node.js, Python, Java, and Go, or custom Docker images can be used for specific requirements. Environment variables configure build behavior, sourced from buildspec file, build project configuration, or Parameter Store for secrets. Artifacts specification identifies output files or directories to preserve after build completion, uploaded to S3 bucket for subsequent pipeline stages or deployment. Reports integration publishes test results and code coverage to CodeBuild console for visibility and trend analysis. CodeBuild integrates with CodePipeline as build action, triggered automatically when source changes are detected in CodeCommit, GitHub, or other repositories. Build projects define source location, environment image, compute type based on resource requirements, service role for AWS service access permissions, VPC configuration if builds need private resource access, and timeout limiting maximum build duration. CloudWatch Logs captures build output for debugging with log group and stream per build. Caching improves build performance by preserving dependencies between builds, specifying cache type as S3 or local with paths to preserve like node_modules. Cost optimization includes using small compute types for lightweight builds, implementing caching to reduce dependency download time, and cleaning up old build artifacts from S3. Security best practices include storing secrets in Secrets Manager or Parameter Store referencing them as environment variables, using least privilege IAM roles, and enabling artifact encryption. Option A, CodeDeploy, handles deployment not building. Option C, Lambda, has limitations for build workloads. Option D, EC2 servers, require management overhead. CodeBuild specifically addresses build automation requirements in CI/CD pipelines with managed infrastructure and deep AWS integration.
Question 33
A developer needs to implement blue/green deployment strategy for a containerized application running on Amazon ECS. Which deployment configuration enables traffic to shift from old version to new version gradually?
A) ECS rolling update deployment
B) ECS blue/green deployment with CodeDeploy
C) ECS service update with minimum healthy percent
D) Manual task definition version updates
Answer: B)
Explanation:
ECS blue/green deployment with CodeDeploy enables gradual traffic shifting from old task set (blue) to new task set (green) with automated rollback capabilities if deployment fails health checks or CloudWatch alarms trigger. This deployment strategy minimizes risk by validating new version with production traffic incrementally before complete cutover. The architecture uses Application Load Balancer (ALB) or Network Load Balancer (NLB) with two target groups where blue target group points to current task set serving production traffic, and green target group points to new task set being deployed. CodeDeploy orchestrates deployment by creating new task set with updated task definition, registering new tasks with green target group, rerouting listener rules to shift percentage of traffic from blue to green over time according to deployment configuration, monitoring deployment health using target group health checks and optional CloudWatch alarms, automatically rolling back if failures exceed thresholds, and terminating blue task set after successful deployment. Traffic shifting strategies include Canary where specified percentage shifts immediately followed by remaining traffic after interval like Canary10Percent5Minutes shifts 10% then waits 5 minutes before shifting remaining 90%, Linear where traffic shifts in equal increments over time like Linear10PercentEvery1Minute shifts 10% every minute for 10 minutes, and All-at-once for immediate complete cutover. Deployment configuration specifies deployment group containing ECS service, load balancer information including listener and target groups, deployment configuration name defining traffic shift pattern, and optional CloudWatch alarms that trigger automatic rollback. AppSpec file for ECS specifies task definition ARN, container name and port for load balancer, and lifecycle hooks for custom logic during deployment. Hooks include BeforeInstall, AfterInstall, BeforeAllowTraffic for validation before receiving traffic, and AfterAllowTraffic for verification after traffic shift. Lambda functions implement hook logic performing tasks like smoke tests or cache warming. Rollback occurs automatically when CloudWatch alarms exceed thresholds or target group health checks fail, shifting traffic back to blue environment and terminating green tasks. Blue/green deployment advantages include instant rollback capability without redeployment, production validation with actual traffic, zero-downtime deployments, and A/B testing possibilities. Considerations include double resource usage during deployment requiring capacity planning, and ALB/NLB requirement for traffic management. Option A, rolling updates, replace tasks gradually but without traffic management. Option C, minimum healthy percent, controls task count during updates but not traffic. Option D, manual updates, lack automation and orchestration. ECS blue/green with CodeDeploy specifically provides sophisticated deployment orchestration with traffic management and automated rollback.
Question 34
A developer is building an application that needs to process user-uploaded files asynchronously with status updates sent to clients in real-time. Which AWS service combination provides real-time bidirectional communication?
A) API Gateway REST API with polling
B) API Gateway WebSocket API with Lambda
C) Amazon SNS with email notifications
D) Amazon SQS with long polling
Answer: B)
Explanation:
API Gateway WebSocket API with Lambda provides real-time bidirectional communication enabling servers to push updates to connected clients without polling, ideal for real-time status updates, notifications, and collaborative applications. WebSocket protocol establishes persistent connections allowing both client and server to send messages anytime unlike HTTP request-response pattern. The WebSocket API defines routes handling different message types including $connect route triggered when client establishes connection, performing authentication and connection registration, $disconnect route triggered when connection closes, for cleanup and deregistration, $default route handling messages not matching other routes, and custom routes for specific message types like “sendmessage” or “updatestatus”. Each route integrates with Lambda function, DynamoDB, or other AWS services for processing. Connection management stores active connection IDs in DynamoDB table mapping connection IDs to user IDs or session information, enabling server-to-client message delivery. When files finish processing, Lambda retrieves connection IDs for the user and posts messages using API Gateway Management API’s POST /@connections/{connectionId} endpoint. The API requires IAM permissions for execute-api:ManageConnections action. Message flow works as follows: client uploads file triggering S3 event to Lambda for processing, Lambda stores processing job with connection ID in DynamoDB, asynchronous processing Lambda monitors job completion, upon completion Lambda retrieves connection ID from DynamoDB, Lambda posts status update message to connection using Management API, and client receives real-time update via WebSocket. Connection lifecycle handling includes implementing heartbeat mechanism with periodic ping/pong messages preventing idle timeout, graceful disconnect handling with $disconnect route cleaning up resources, and automatic reconnection logic in client for transient network failures. Authentication integrates with Lambda authorizers validating JWT tokens or custom authentication during $connect, storing user identity with connection ID. Cost considerations include charges per million messages sent or received and per connection minute, making WebSocket cost-effective for frequent updates but potentially expensive for mostly idle connections. Best practices include limiting message size to reduce costs and improve performance, implementing message acknowledgment for reliability, using connection IDs as temporary identifiers not persistent user IDs, and monitoring connection counts and message volumes. Option A, polling, increases latency and costs. Option C, SNS email, isn’t real-time bidirectional communication. Option D, SQS polling, doesn’t push to clients. WebSocket API specifically enables real-time bidirectional communication between servers and clients with persistent connections ideal for status updates and notifications.
Question 35
A developer needs to ensure that sensitive database credentials are not hardcoded in Lambda functions. Which AWS service should be used to securely store and retrieve credentials at runtime?
A) Environment variables in Lambda configuration
B) AWS Secrets Manager with automatic rotation
C) S3 bucket with encrypted objects
D) CloudFormation parameters
Answer: B)
Explanation:
AWS Secrets Manager provides secure storage for sensitive information like database credentials with built-in automatic rotation, encryption at rest using KMS, fine-grained access control through IAM policies, and audit logging via CloudTrail. Secrets Manager is specifically designed for managing secrets throughout their lifecycle including creation, rotation, and deletion. The service stores secrets as encrypted key-value pairs or JSON structures supporting multiple credential types including database credentials with username and password, API keys for third-party services, OAuth tokens, and custom secrets. Encryption uses AWS KMS customer master keys ensuring data is encrypted at rest with the ability to use AWS managed keys or customer managed keys for additional control. Lambda functions retrieve secrets at runtime using Secrets Manager API’s GetSecretValue operation, specifying secret name or ARN. The Lambda execution role requires secretsmanager:GetSecretValue permission for the specific secret. Best practice implements caching to avoid retrieving secrets on every invocation reducing API calls and costs. AWS provides Lambda layers with secrets caching functionality for various languages. Automatic rotation is Secrets Manager’s key advantage where rotation Lambda functions update credentials in both Secrets Manager and the target service periodically, typically every 30, 60, or 90 days. For RDS databases, Secrets Manager provides pre-built rotation functions handling common database types including MySQL, PostgreSQL, SQL Server, and Oracle. Custom rotation functions support other credential types implementing rotation logic specific to the service. Rotation strategies include single user rotation where the same credentials are updated requiring brief downtime, or alternating users rotation maintaining two sets of credentials enabling zero-downtime rotation. Version staging labels track secret versions with AWSCURRENT pointing to active credentials and AWSPENDING pointing to credentials being rotated. Applications retrieve AWSCURRENT ensuring they always use valid credentials. Security benefits include eliminating hardcoded secrets in code or configuration, centralized secret management with consistent policies, encryption protecting secrets at rest and in transit, IAM integration for access control, CloudTrail logging for compliance auditing, and automatic rotation reducing risk of credential compromise. Cost includes monthly charge per secret plus API request charges with caching minimizing request costs. Integration with other services includes RDS Proxy using Secrets Manager for connection pooling with automatic credential refresh, ECS task definitions referencing secrets for container environment variables, and Systems Manager Parameter Store for non-sensitive configuration. Option A, environment variables, can be encrypted but lack rotation capabilities. Option C, S3 storage, requires custom management. Option D, CloudFormation parameters, are for infrastructure configuration not runtime secrets. Secrets Manager specifically addresses secure credential management with automatic rotation capabilities essential for production applications.
Question 36
A developer is implementing a microservices architecture where Service A needs to call Service B synchronously with automatic retries and circuit breaking. Which AWS service provides these capabilities?
A) Amazon SQS with dead letter queues
B) AWS Step Functions with error handling
C) AWS App Mesh with Envoy proxy
D) Amazon EventBridge rules
Answer: C)
Explanation:
AWS App Mesh provides service mesh capabilities including retry policies, circuit breaking, timeouts, and observability for microservices running on ECS, EKS, or EC2 using Envoy proxy for traffic management. Service mesh architecture deploys Envoy proxy as sidecar container alongside application containers, intercepting all network traffic enabling sophisticated traffic control without application code changes. App Mesh defines virtual services representing logical services, virtual nodes representing running instances of services, virtual routers defining routing rules, and routes specifying how traffic is distributed. Retry policies configure automatic retry attempts for failed requests specifying maximum retries, retry timeouts, and retry conditions like HTTP status codes or gRPC status codes triggering retries. For example, retrying on HTTP 503 Service Unavailable with exponential backoff handles temporary failures gracefully. Circuit breaking prevents cascading failures by monitoring error rates and temporarily stopping requests to unhealthy services, configuring thresholds for max connections, max pending requests, and max concurrent requests. When thresholds are exceeded, new requests fail fast rather than waiting for overloaded service. Timeout configuration sets maximum duration for requests preventing indefinite waits if services hang or become unresponsive. Connection timeouts establish TCP connection limits while request timeouts limit end-to-end request duration. These policies improve reliability by isolating failures, preventing thread pool exhaustion, and providing predictable failure behavior. Observability features include distributed tracing integration with X-Ray showing request flow across services, CloudWatch metrics for success rates, latency, and request counts per service, and Envoy access logs with detailed request information. Health checks monitor service instance health with App Mesh routing traffic only to healthy instances. Integration involves deploying Envoy proxy containers in task definitions or pod specifications, defining App Mesh resources through CloudFormation or APIs, configuring virtual service hostnames in service discovery, and deploying App Mesh controller for Kubernetes integration if using EKS. Security features include TLS encryption for service-to-service communication using certificates from ACM Private CA, authorization policies controlling which services can communicate, and traffic encryption protecting data in transit. Traffic management capabilities include weighted routing for canary deployments, header-based routing for A/B testing, and request mirroring for testing changes with production traffic. Option A, SQS, provides asynchronous messaging not synchronous calls. Option B, Step Functions, orchestrates workflows not service-to-service calls. Option D, EventBridge, handles event routing not direct service calls. App Mesh specifically provides service mesh capabilities for microservices communication with retry, circuit breaking, and observability.
Question 37
A developer needs to implement a Lambda function that processes records from a Kinesis Data Stream with exactly-once processing semantics. Which Lambda configuration ensures records are not processed multiple times?
A) Enable event source mapping with batch size 1
B) Implement idempotent processing logic with DynamoDB
C) Configure concurrent execution limit to 1
D) Use Kinesis IteratorAge metric for monitoring
Answer: B)
Explanation:
Implementing idempotent processing logic with DynamoDB ensures exactly-once semantics by tracking processed record IDs and skipping duplicates if Lambda retries occur. Lambda’s integration with Kinesis provides at-least-once delivery meaning records may be delivered multiple times during retries or errors, requiring application-level deduplication for exactly-once processing. The idempotent pattern stores record identifiers (sequence numbers) in DynamoDB table before processing with conditional writes ensuring only one function invocation successfully records the sequence number and proceeds with processing. The workflow begins when Lambda receives batch of records from Kinesis stream, extracts sequence numbers from records, queries DynamoDB table to check if records were already processed, processes only new records not found in DynamoDB, writes sequence numbers to DynamoDB with conditional expression preventing duplicates, and performs business logic only after successful DynamoDB write. DynamoDB conditional writes use attribute_not_exists condition ensuring the record ID doesn’t exist, causing duplicate writes to fail preventing duplicate processing. The tracking table schema uses record ID or sequence number as partition key, processing timestamp as attribute, and optional TTL for automatic cleanup of old records. Error handling requires careful design where if DynamoDB write succeeds but business logic fails, retry processing finds the record already tracked and skips it appropriately, or stores processing status allowing resume from checkpoint. Lambda’s built-in retry behavior automatically retries failed batches with exponential backoff, making idempotency essential. Kinesis-specific considerations include Lambda reading records in order within each shard, processing batches of records together, and using iterator types like TRIM_HORIZON for reading from beginning or LATEST for reading only new records. Event source mapping configuration includes batch size controlling records per invocation, batch window collecting records for maximum duration before invoking, parallelization factor for concurrent invocations per shard, on-failure destination for failed batches, maximum record age for discarding old records, and retry attempts before sending to failure destination. Monitoring uses CloudWatch metrics including IteratorAge measuring processing lag, and custom metrics tracking duplicate detection counts. Alternative patterns include using Kinesis Data Analytics for exactly-once processing with SQL transformations, or implementing checkpointing in application state. Option A, batch size 1, doesn’t prevent retries. Option C, concurrency limit, reduces throughput without guaranteeing exactly-once. Option D, monitoring, observes but doesn’t prevent duplicates. Idempotent processing with DynamoDB specifically provides exactly-once semantics handling Lambda’s at-least-once delivery model.
Question 38
A developer is deploying a web application using AWS Elastic Beanstalk that requires environment-specific configuration values. Which method should be used to manage configuration without hardcoding values in the application?
A) Hardcode values in application.properties file
B) Use Elastic Beanstalk environment properties
C) Store configuration in Git repository
D) Include values in Docker image
Answer: B)
Explanation:
Elastic Beanstalk environment properties provide centralized configuration management where key-value pairs are defined at environment level and automatically injected as environment variables accessible to applications at runtime. This approach separates configuration from code enabling different values across environments like development, staging, and production without code changes or redeployment. Environment properties are configured through Elastic Beanstalk console, EB CLI, or CloudFormation specifying property name and value pairs. Applications access these values through language-specific environment variable methods like process.env.PROPERTY_NAME in Node.js, os.getenv() in Python, or System.getenv() in Java. Common configuration includes database connection strings with RDS endpoints and credentials, API endpoints for external services varying by environment, feature flags enabling or disabling functionality, logging levels adjusting verbosity per environment, and third-party service keys for services like payment processors or analytics. Best practices include using descriptive property names with consistent naming conventions, avoiding sensitive values in favor of Secrets Manager references, documenting required properties for application operation, and using default values in code where appropriate. For sensitive configuration like database passwords, use Elastic Beanstalk integration with Secrets Manager where properties reference secret ARNs and Elastic Beanstalk automatically retrieves secret values at deployment time injecting them as environment variables. This maintains security while providing convenient access. Configuration deployment updates environment properties without restarting environment for many property types, though some changes may trigger rolling updates or replacements. Elastic Beanstalk also supports configuration files in .ebextensions directory for advanced configuration including option settings, resource customization, and commands. These YAML files define settings per platform with option_settings specifying Elastic Beanstalk namespace and option values. Environment properties complement configuration files where properties handle dynamic runtime values and configuration files handle static platform settings. Saved configurations enable reuse across environments capturing complete environment settings as templates. Managing multiple environments uses separate Elastic Beanstalk environments per deployment stage with distinct property values promoting consistency while allowing necessary variation. CloudFormation integration manages Elastic Beanstalk environments as infrastructure as code with properties defined in templates. Option A, hardcoding, prevents environment-specific values. Option C, Git storage, exposes values in source control. Option D, Docker image, requires rebuilding for configuration changes. Elastic Beanstalk environment properties specifically provide flexible configuration management with environment isolation and easy updates.
Question 39
A developer needs to implement request throttling for a public API to prevent abuse and ensure fair usage across clients. Which API Gateway feature limits the number of requests per client?
A) Resource policies only
B) Usage plans with API keys
C) Lambda concurrency limits
D) CloudFront rate limiting
Answer: B)
Explanation:
Usage plans with API keys provide request throttling capabilities where administrators define rate limits and quotas per API key enabling differentiated service levels and fair usage enforcement. API keys identify clients making requests while usage plans define the allowed usage including rate limits controlling sustained request rate per second, burst limits allowing temporary spikes above rate limit, and quotas capping total requests per day, week, or month. Multiple usage plans support tiering where free tier might allow 100 requests per day with 10 requests per second, basic tier allows 10000 requests per day with 100 requests per second, and premium tier provides higher limits or unlimited access. This monetization strategy links API keys to subscription levels. Configuration involves creating usage plan with throttle and quota settings, creating API keys representing individual clients or applications, associating API keys with usage plan, and deploying API stage with API key required setting enabled. Clients include API key in x-api-key header with each request for identification. API Gateway tracks requests per key enforcing limits, returning HTTP 429 Too Many Requests when limits are exceeded. The response includes Retry-After header indicating when clients can retry. Throttling operates at two levels where account-level limits apply across all APIs in region (default 10000 requests per second with 5000 burst), and usage plan limits apply per API key providing granular control. Stage-level throttling sets defaults for API stages while method-level throttling configures limits per resource and HTTP method enabling fine-grained control. For example, POST operations might have lower limits than GET operations reflecting their different resource costs. Best practices include setting conservative initial limits increasing based on actual usage, monitoring throttle metrics with CloudWatch showing 4XXError and 5XXError counts, implementing client retry logic with exponential backoff, caching responses to reduce API calls, and clearly documenting rate limits for API consumers. Security considerations include rotating API keys periodically, implementing API key validation in backend if needed, using IAM authorization for internal services instead of API keys, and combining API keys with other authentication methods for enhanced security. Advanced throttling uses Lambda authorizers returning usage plan IDs dynamically based on authentication enabling per-user limits without creating individual API keys. Integration with AWS WAF adds layer 7 protection blocking malicious requests before reaching API Gateway. Option A, resource policies, control access not rate limits. Option C, Lambda concurrency, limits backend capacity not client requests. Option D, CloudFront, caches responses but doesn’t enforce API-level throttling. Usage plans with API keys specifically provide request rate limiting and quota management with per-client granularity.
Question 40
A developer is implementing continuous deployment for Lambda functions and needs to test new versions with a small percentage of traffic before full deployment. Which Lambda feature enables gradual traffic shifting?
A) Lambda versions only
B) Lambda aliases with traffic shifting
C) Lambda layers
D) Lambda reserved concurrency
Answer: B)
Explanation:
Lambda aliases with traffic shifting enable gradual deployment by routing configurable percentages of traffic between two function versions, supporting canary and linear deployment patterns for safe production releases with automatic rollback capabilities. Lambda versioning creates immutable snapshots of function code and configuration with unique version numbers, while aliases are pointers to specific versions providing stable endpoints for invocations. Traffic shifting configures aliases to route traffic between two versions simultaneously where primary version receives most traffic and secondary version receives small percentage for testing. For example, alias “production” might route 95% traffic to version 5 and 5% to version 6, gradually increasing version 6’s share as confidence grows. Deployment strategies include canary where fixed percentage shifts immediately for validation period before complete cutover like 10% canary for 10 minutes, linear where traffic shifts in equal increments over time like 10% every minute for 10 minutes, and all-at-once for immediate switch. AWS SAM (Serverless Application Model) and CodeDeploy automate traffic shifting with deployment configurations specifying pattern and timing. SAM deployment preferences in template define DeploymentPreference type like Canary10Percent10Minutes or Linear10PercentEvery1Minute, CloudWatch alarms triggering automatic rollback if errors exceed thresholds, and pre-traffic and post-traffic hooks for validation. CodeDeploy integration creates deployment groups for Lambda functions, application revisions containing new function versions, and deployment configurations controlling traffic shift. CloudWatch alarms monitor function metrics including invocation errors, duration, and throttles, triggering rollback if thresholds breach during deployment. Rollback automatically reverts alias to route 100% traffic to previous version stopping deployment. This safety mechanism prevents bad deployments from affecting all users. Traffic shifting benefits include reduced risk by limiting exposure to potential issues, production validation with real traffic and workloads, gradual migration allowing performance monitoring, and instant rollback without redeployment. Considerations include maintaining two versions simultaneously during deployment requiring capacity planning, and implementing version-aware code if new version has schema changes. Alias invocation uses alias ARN instead of function ARN providing stable interface while underlying versions change. Event source mappings and triggers can target aliases enabling seamless version transitions. Best practices include defining CloudWatch alarms for key metrics, testing new versions in non-production environments before traffic shifting, implementing version compatibility for dependent resources, automating deployment with CI/CD pipelines, and monitoring business metrics not just technical metrics during deployment. Option A, versions alone, lack traffic routing capabilities. Option C, layers, share code between functions but don’t route traffic. Option D, reserved concurrency, controls execution capacity not traffic distribution. Lambda aliases with traffic shifting specifically provide gradual deployment capabilities with automated rollback for safe production releases.
