Visit here for our full Amazon AWS Certified Advanced Networking – Specialty ANS-C01 exam dumps and practice test questions.
Question 141
A global media company needs to deploy a multi-region architecture for content delivery with low latency, private connectivity between regions, and centralized security policies. Which solution meets these requirements most effectively?
A) Deploy VPC peering between each regional VPC and configure individual security groups per VPC
B) Use AWS Direct Connect with redundant connections, integrate Transit Gateway inter-region peering, and deploy Network Firewall with centralized logging via CloudWatch
C) Use public-facing ALBs in each region with Route 53 latency-based routing and TLS termination
D) Deploy EC2-based VPN appliances in each region and configure manual IPsec tunnels
Answer: B
Explanation:
When designing a multi-region architecture for a global media company, achieving low-latency, high-throughput private connectivity, and centralized security enforcement is essential. Relying solely on VPC peering across multiple regions leads to scaling challenges, as each new VPC requires additional peering connections and manual route management. This approach increases operational complexity and the chance of misconfigurations. EC2-based VPN appliances also introduce potential throughput limitations, single points of failure, and high operational overhead, which are unsuitable for enterprise-grade media workloads. Public-facing ALBs with Route 53, although useful for distributing traffic, expose traffic to the internet and cannot ensure low-latency, private connectivity across multiple regions.
AWS Direct Connect provides dedicated, private network links between on-premises locations and AWS regions, ensuring predictable low-latency, high-throughput performance, which is crucial for global media content delivery and real-time video streaming. Redundant Direct Connect connections increase availability and resilience, reducing the risk of downtime in critical broadcast or streaming applications.
Transit Gateway inter-region peering allows centralized routing and policy enforcement, connecting multiple VPCs across regions without the operational overhead of full-mesh VPC peering. This simplifies management, reduces routing complexity, and provides predictable traffic flows. AWS Network Firewall deployed at the Transit Gateway hub enables stateful inspection, threat detection, and centralized security policy enforcement, which is crucial for protecting media content and meeting enterprise security standards.
CloudWatch monitoring integrates logging and metrics collection across the multi-region setup, offering centralized observability for traffic analysis, anomaly detection, and compliance auditing. Operational teams can quickly identify issues, analyze network performance, and respond to security events efficiently.
Option A requires maintaining multiple VPC peering connections and individual security policies, which does not scale effectively. Option C exposes sensitive media traffic to the public internet and introduces potential latency variability. Option D creates management challenges and throughput bottlenecks.
Combining Direct Connect, Transit Gateway inter-region peering, Network Firewall, and CloudWatch monitoring provides a scalable, secure, low-latency, highly observable multi-region network, ideal for a global media company delivering real-time, high-bandwidth content.
Question 142
A multinational enterprise wants to implement a global AWS architecture with multi-region connectivity, centralized security inspection, and end-to-end monitoring. Which AWS architecture provides the most scalable and secure solution?
A) Configure multiple Site-to-Site VPNs from each on-premises site to every regional VPC
B) Use AWS Direct Connect with redundant connections, Transit Gateway inter-region peering, Network Firewall for centralized inspection, and CloudWatch for monitoring
C) Deploy EC2 VPN appliances in each region with manual IPsec configurations and separate logging
D) Use public-facing ALBs with Route 53 latency-based routing and TLS termination
Answer: B
Explanation:
Global enterprises require a network architecture that supports high throughput, low-latency connectivity, centralized security enforcement, and end-to-end observability. Multiple Site-to-Site VPNs create operational complexity, increased latency, and potential routing conflicts. EC2 VPN appliances introduce management overhead and single points of failure. Public-facing ALBs with Route 53 expose traffic to the public internet and cannot provide predictable private connectivity or centralized inspection.
AWS Direct Connect provides private, high-throughput, low-latency connections between on-premises environments and AWS. Redundant Direct Connect links ensure high availability and business continuity for critical enterprise applications.
Transit Gateway inter-region peering centralizes routing between VPCs across regions, eliminating the complexity of full-mesh VPC peering. Centralized route tables simplify management, improve security posture, and ensure predictable traffic flows.
AWS Network Firewall deployed at the Transit Gateway hub allows stateful inspection, threat detection, and centralized security enforcement. This ensures that all inter-region and on-premises traffic adheres to corporate security policies and regulatory requirements. CloudWatch monitoring enables real-time observability, logging, metrics collection, and anomaly detection, supporting both operational and compliance needs.
Option A is not scalable due to the manual configuration required for each VPN connection. Option C has throughput limitations and operational overhead. Option D exposes private traffic to the internet and cannot enforce centralized security inspection.
By leveraging Direct Connect, Transit Gateway inter-region peering, Network Firewall, and CloudWatch, the enterprise achieves a robust, scalable, secure, and observable multi-region AWS network, meeting the demands of global operations and compliance standards.
Question 143
A SaaS provider wants to deploy multi-region applications with low-latency private connectivity, centralized security inspection, and logging for audit compliance. Which architecture is most appropriate?
A) Deploy multiple VPC peering connections and configure separate firewalls in each region
B) Use AWS Direct Connect with redundant links, integrate Transit Gateway inter-region peering, deploy Network Firewall, and use CloudWatch for centralized logging
C) Configure public-facing ALBs with Route 53 latency-based routing and TLS termination
D) Deploy EC2 VPN appliances in each region with manual IPsec configurations
Answer: B
Explanation:
SaaS providers running multi-region workloads require a network architecture that supports private, low-latency connectivity, centralized security, and comprehensive logging. Multiple VPC peering connections with separate firewalls introduce management complexity and operational overhead as the number of regions increases. Public-facing ALBs expose traffic to the internet, introducing latency variability and security risks. EC2 VPN appliances require manual configuration, maintenance, and can become single points of failure, making them unsuitable for enterprise-scale SaaS.
AWS Direct Connect provides dedicated, private, high-throughput links to AWS, ensuring predictable performance and low-latency connectivity between on-premises and AWS regions. Redundant links improve availability and resilience, critical for SaaS applications serving global customers.
Transit Gateway inter-region peering allows centralized routing across multiple regions, reducing the need for complex mesh networks and simplifying route management. Centralized route tables improve consistency, reduce misconfigurations, and ensure predictable inter-region traffic flows.
AWS Network Firewall enables centralized traffic inspection, intrusion prevention, and enforcement of security policies, ensuring that traffic between regions and on-premises locations complies with regulatory standards. CloudWatch monitoring provides centralized logging, metrics collection, and anomaly detection, supporting operational visibility and compliance auditing.
Option A requires managing multiple firewalls and peering connections individually, which is operationally intensive. Option C exposes sensitive traffic to the internet. Option D introduces manual maintenance and potential single points of failure.
Combining Direct Connect, Transit Gateway inter-region peering, Network Firewall, and CloudWatch logging enables a secure, low-latency, highly observable, and compliant multi-region SaaS architecture, providing scalability and operational efficiency for global customer workloads.
Question 144
A multinational financial institution needs a private, low-latency, multi-region AWS network with centralized firewall policies, monitoring, and compliance auditing. Which solution is optimal?
A) Multiple VPC peering connections with separate security appliances per VPC
B) AWS Direct Connect with redundant links, Transit Gateway inter-region peering, Network Firewall at the hub, and CloudWatch for monitoring and logging
C) EC2 VPN appliances deployed in each region with manually configured IPsec tunnels
D) Public-facing ALBs with Route 53 latency-based routing and TLS termination
Answer: B
Explanation:
Financial institutions have stringent security and compliance requirements, including private connectivity, low-latency traffic, centralized inspection, and auditable logging. Multiple VPC peering connections become unmanageable as regions increase, requiring manual route updates and security configurations. EC2 VPN appliances introduce operational complexity, limited throughput, and single points of failure. Public-facing ALBs with Route 53 routing expose sensitive traffic to the internet and cannot enforce private, low-latency, secure connectivity.
AWS Direct Connect provides private, high-throughput, low-latency connections to AWS regions, ensuring predictable performance for financial transactions. Redundant connections guarantee high availability and business continuity.
Transit Gateway inter-region peering centralizes routing, allowing efficient traffic flow across regions without complex mesh networks. Centralized route tables simplify operations, reduce configuration errors, and improve network security posture.
AWS Network Firewall deployed at the Transit Gateway hub provides stateful inspection, threat detection, and centralized enforcement of security policies, essential for regulatory compliance, including PCI DSS and SOC 2. CloudWatch monitoring and logging enable centralized visibility into network traffic, anomalies, and audit-ready logging for regulatory reporting.
Option A is not scalable and increases management complexity. Option C introduces throughput limitations and operational overhead. Option D exposes sensitive financial data to the public internet, violating compliance standards.
Combining Direct Connect, Transit Gateway inter-region peering, Network Firewall, and CloudWatch monitoring results in a secure, scalable, low-latency, and compliant multi-region network, suitable for critical financial workloads.
Question 145
A SaaS company requires multi-region AWS connectivity with low-latency inter-region traffic, centralized firewall enforcement, and end-to-end observability for compliance. Which architecture satisfies these needs?
A) Deploy multiple Site-to-Site VPNs to each regional VPC with individual firewall appliances
B) AWS Direct Connect with redundant links, Transit Gateway inter-region peering, Network Firewall for centralized inspection, and CloudWatch for observability
C) Public-facing ALBs in each region with Route 53 weighted routing and TLS termination
D) EC2 VPN appliances deployed in each region with manually maintained IPsec tunnels
Answer: B
Explanation:
SaaS companies deploying multi-region workloads need a network design that ensures private, low-latency inter-region connectivity, centralized security enforcement, and comprehensive monitoring for compliance. Site-to-Site VPNs for each regional VPC create operational complexity, limited throughput, and routing management overhead. EC2 VPN appliances introduce single points of failure, throughput limitations, and maintenance overhead, making them unsuitable for global SaaS deployments. Public-facing ALBs with Route 53 expose traffic to the internet, introducing latency variability and security concerns.
AWS Direct Connect provides dedicated, private network links between on-premises infrastructure and AWS, offering predictable low-latency and high-throughput connectivity. Redundant connections ensure high availability and resiliency for mission-critical workloads.
Transit Gateway inter-region peering enables centralized routing across multiple regions, reducing the need for a complex VPC peering mesh. Centralized route tables allow for consistent traffic policies, simplified management, and predictable latency.
AWS Network Firewall provides stateful inspection, intrusion detection, and centralized enforcement of security policies, ensuring compliance with enterprise and regulatory requirements. CloudWatch monitoring provides end-to-end observability, metrics collection, anomaly detection, and audit-ready logging, supporting operational and compliance needs.
Option A is operationally complex and does not scale efficiently. Option C exposes traffic to the public internet, which is unsuitable for private workloads. Option D introduces operational overhead and potential points of failure.
By combining Direct Connect, Transit Gateway inter-region peering, Network Firewall, and CloudWatch monitoring, SaaS companies can achieve a scalable, secure, low-latency, and fully observable multi-region architecture, ideal for global SaaS applications with strict compliance and performance requirements.
Question 146
A company wants to design a highly available and resilient network architecture across multiple AWS regions for its mission-critical application. The solution must ensure low latency connectivity and efficient routing between regions. Which of the following AWS services should be used to achieve this objective?
A) Direct Connect Gateway
B) VPC Peering
C) AWS Transit Gateway Inter-Region Peering
D) AWS VPN CloudHub
Answer: C
Explanation:
To design a highly available and resilient network across multiple AWS regions with low latency and efficient routing, AWS Transit Gateway Inter-Region Peering is the most suitable option. AWS Transit Gateway (TGW) allows organizations to connect multiple VPCs and on-premises networks through a central hub, reducing the complexity and scaling challenges of managing multiple point-to-point connections. Inter-Region Peering extends the capabilities of TGW by enabling seamless connectivity between transit gateways in different regions. This provides low-latency, high-bandwidth routing, making it ideal for global applications that require high availability.
Option A) Direct Connect Gateway is primarily used for establishing private connectivity between on-premises environments and AWS. While it supports multiple VPCs, it does not inherently provide the same level of inter-region routing flexibility as TGW Inter-Region Peering. Option B) VPC Peering is limited to peering connections within a single region and does not natively support global connectivity or centralized management. While technically possible to establish multiple VPC peering connections, it quickly becomes unmanageable at scale and lacks the centralized routing capabilities. Option D) AWS VPN CloudHub is designed for connecting multiple on-premises locations using VPN tunnels but is not ideal for inter-region VPC-to-VPC communication due to higher latency and limited bandwidth compared to TGW Inter-Region Peering.
Using TGW Inter-Region Peering also allows leveraging route propagation across regions, reducing manual route table management and improving operational efficiency. Additionally, it enables organizations to maintain consistent security policies using network segmentation and AWS Network Firewall integration. By centralizing traffic through TGW hubs, organizations gain the ability to monitor, log, and audit traffic flows using Amazon CloudWatch and VPC Flow Logs, enhancing security and compliance posture. This architecture supports multi-region disaster recovery strategies, ensuring mission-critical applications maintain continuity even during regional failures. In conclusion, for organizations seeking scalable, resilient, and globally connected network architectures, AWS Transit Gateway Inter-Region Peering provides the most comprehensive solution.
Question 147
A company needs to implement a multi-tier architecture where the front-end web servers must communicate with backend databases across multiple VPCs in the same AWS region. The solution must support high throughput, low latency, and minimal operational overhead. Which AWS service is the most suitable for this scenario?
A) VPC Peering
B) AWS Direct Connect
C) AWS Transit Gateway
D) VPN Connection
Answer: C
Explanation:
For a multi-tier architecture requiring high throughput and low latency between multiple VPCs within the same region, AWS Transit Gateway is the optimal solution. Transit Gateway allows organizations to consolidate multiple VPC connections into a central hub, simplifying network management and minimizing the complexity associated with configuring numerous VPC peering connections. It provides scalable, high-bandwidth connectivity while allowing route propagation between attached VPCs, which is essential for backend communication with minimal latency.
Option A) VPC Peering could achieve direct connectivity, but it introduces operational overhead as each VPC-to-VPC connection requires manual management. This approach does not scale efficiently as the number of VPCs increases and complicates routing policies. Option B) AWS Direct Connect is designed primarily for private connectivity between on-premises data centers and AWS environments, and while it provides low-latency links, it does not address inter-VPC connectivity requirements within AWS. Option D) VPN Connection is better suited for secure connections from remote networks or offices, but performance limitations and higher latency make it unsuitable for high-throughput internal communications between multiple VPCs.
Transit Gateway also supports integration with AWS Network Firewall, Amazon VPC Flow Logs, and AWS CloudWatch for monitoring and enforcing security policies. It allows traffic segmentation between development, testing, and production environments, providing better governance. The architecture reduces operational complexity because adding new VPCs or modifying connectivity patterns only requires attaching them to the Transit Gateway and configuring appropriate route propagation. This design also supports future expansion, such as inter-region connectivity, enabling the organization to scale globally without major network redesign. Overall, AWS Transit Gateway provides a robust, scalable, and manageable solution for multi-tier architectures requiring high throughput and low-latency inter-VPC communication.
Question 148
A global e-commerce company requires a solution that optimizes latency and accelerates content delivery to users across multiple continents. The solution must provide both caching and security features to protect against DDoS attacks and ensure content availability during traffic spikes. Which combination of AWS services is the most appropriate?
A) Amazon CloudFront and AWS WAF
B) AWS Direct Connect and VPC Peering
C) AWS Transit Gateway and VPN Connection
D) Amazon Route 53 and Direct Connect
Answer: A
Explanation:
To optimize latency and accelerate content delivery globally, Amazon CloudFront, combined with AWS Web Application Firewall (WAF), is the most suitable solution. CloudFront is a globally distributed content delivery network (CDN) that caches static and dynamic content at edge locations close to end users, significantly reducing latency and improving application performance. By integrating AWS WAF, the company can implement security controls such as IP filtering, SQL injection protection, and DDoS mitigation, ensuring content remains secure during traffic spikes or attacks.
Option B) AWS Direct Connect and VPC Peering do not address content caching or global distribution. Direct Connect is optimized for private connectivity rather than accelerating public-facing content, and VPC Peering is limited to inter-VPC communication within a region. Option C) AWS Transit Gateway and VPN Connection are primarily for inter-VPC connectivity and private network extension rather than global content distribution and caching. Option D) Amazon Route 53 and Direct Connect offer DNS management and private network connectivity but do not provide caching or edge optimization capabilities required for global content acceleration.
CloudFront also provides seamless integration with AWS Lambda@Edge, enabling developers to run custom code closer to end users for request and response manipulation, further enhancing performance and personalization. Additionally, CloudFront supports origin failover, allowing content to remain available if the primary origin experiences issues, which is critical during peak traffic periods. By leveraging a combination of CloudFront and WAF, organizations can achieve both performance optimization and robust security, ensuring users experience minimal latency while protecting critical assets. This approach also reduces operational overhead as traffic is automatically routed through edge locations, removing the need for manual traffic distribution management.
Question 149
A financial organization wants to connect its on-premises network to AWS while ensuring low latency, high reliability, and predictable performance for mission-critical applications. The solution must allow multiple VPCs to communicate with on-premises resources without using the public internet. Which AWS service combination best meets these requirements?
A) AWS VPN CloudHub and VPC Peering
B) Direct Connect and AWS Transit Gateway
C) AWS Site-to-Site VPN and Route 53
D) VPC Peering and Internet Gateway
Answer: B
Explanation:
For connecting an on-premises network to AWS with low latency, high reliability, and predictable performance, Direct Connect in combination with AWS Transit Gateway is the best choice. AWS Direct Connect provides dedicated private network connections, ensuring consistent performance, higher bandwidth, and lower latency than internet-based solutions. Transit Gateway enables multiple VPCs to be connected to this single Direct Connect link through a central hub, facilitating inter-VPC and on-premises communication without requiring public internet routes.
Option A) AWS VPN CloudHub and VPC Peering rely on internet-based VPN connections, which introduces higher latency and less predictable performance. VPC Peering alone does not support scalable connectivity to multiple VPCs and requires point-to-point connections that become operationally complex. Option C) AWS Site-to-Site VPN provides secure connectivity over the public internet but cannot guarantee low latency or consistent bandwidth necessary for mission-critical applications. Option D) VPC Peering combined with an Internet Gateway exposes traffic to public internet pathways, which is unsuitable for security-sensitive workloads.
By integrating Direct Connect with Transit Gateway, organizations can implement a hub-and-spoke topology, allowing simplified routing management, centralized monitoring, and secure access to all connected VPCs. This combination supports features like link aggregation for redundancy, multi-region connectivity, and integration with AWS Network Firewall for enhanced security. The architecture also scales seamlessly as new VPCs or workloads are added without requiring additional point-to-point connections. Monitoring tools such as CloudWatch metrics and VPC Flow Logs provide visibility into network performance, enabling proactive performance management. This ensures the financial organization can maintain compliance, performance consistency, and high availability for its mission-critical applications.
Question 150
A SaaS provider wants to ensure secure, private connectivity between multiple customer VPCs and its central VPC in AWS. The solution must be scalable, provide centralized control, and reduce the complexity of managing individual peering connections. Which approach best satisfies these requirements?
A) VPC Peering
B) AWS Transit Gateway with VPC attachments
C) VPN Connection for each customer VPC
D) AWS Direct Connect for each VPC
Answer: B
Explanation:
To ensure secure and scalable private connectivity between multiple customer VPCs and a central VPC, AWS Transit Gateway with VPC attachments is the most appropriate solution. Transit Gateway acts as a central hub, enabling the organization to connect multiple VPCs without managing individual peering connections. This approach simplifies network administration, reduces operational overhead, and provides centralized routing policies. Traffic between VPCs can be isolated and controlled using route tables and security policies, supporting multi-tenant SaaS architectures securely.
Option A) VPC Peering requires creating individual peering connections for each customer VPC, leading to exponential growth in configuration complexity as more customers are added. It also lacks centralized routing control and can quickly become unmanageable. Option C) VPN Connection for each customer VPC increases management overhead, introduces potential latency, and does not scale efficiently for multi-tenant environments. Option D) AWS Direct Connect for each VPC is impractical due to high costs and operational complexity, especially when connecting a large number of customer VPCs.
Using Transit Gateway allows integration with AWS Network Firewall and VPC Flow Logs, providing enhanced security and visibility. Route propagation ensures that all attached VPCs can communicate efficiently while maintaining isolation as needed. Centralized monitoring and management through CloudWatch provide insights into network health, traffic patterns, and performance, facilitating proactive troubleshooting. Transit Gateway also supports bandwidth scaling and inter-region connectivity, enabling future expansion. In SaaS environments, this architecture allows seamless onboarding of new customer VPCs while maintaining security, compliance, and operational simplicity, making it the ideal approach for multi-tenant network architectures.
Question 151
A global media company wants to deploy a highly available video streaming application across multiple AWS regions. The architecture must ensure seamless user experience, low latency, and automatic failover in case of regional outages. Which AWS services and architecture patterns best meet these requirements?
A) Amazon CloudFront with Origin Failover and Route 53 Active-Active Routing
B) AWS Direct Connect with VPN CloudHub
C) VPC Peering across regions with Transit Gateway
D) AWS Site-to-Site VPN and Elastic Load Balancers
Answer: A
Explanation:
For a global media company delivering high-bandwidth video content, Amazon CloudFront with Origin Failover combined with Route 53 Active-Active Routing provides the most effective solution. CloudFront, as a globally distributed content delivery network (CDN), caches content at edge locations close to users, reducing latency and ensuring smoother streaming. Origin Failover enables automatic switching between primary and secondary origin servers if the primary fails, supporting high availability. Using Route 53’s Active-Active routing policy, user traffic is intelligently distributed across multiple regions based on health checks and latency, which ensures a seamless experience even during regional outages.
Option B) AWS Direct Connect with VPN CloudHub primarily addresses private connectivity between on-premises networks and AWS or between multiple branch offices. While it ensures predictable performance for private traffic, it does not provide global content caching, latency optimization, or failover mechanisms needed for streaming large media files efficiently. Option C) VPC Peering across regions with Transit Gateway is technically feasible but not optimal for direct user-facing content delivery. VPC Peering and Transit Gateway are better suited for inter-VPC or inter-region application connectivity rather than global caching or latency optimization. Option D) AWS Site-to-Site VPN combined with Elastic Load Balancers provides secure connectivity but is primarily designed for internal enterprise workloads, not for globally distributed content delivery or large-scale streaming.
By integrating CloudFront with Route 53, organizations benefit from features such as geo-proximity routing, HTTP/2 support, TLS encryption, and Lambda@Edge for content personalization, enhancing both performance and security. CloudFront automatically handles traffic spikes, reducing the risk of service degradation during high-demand events. Furthermore, logging capabilities such as CloudFront access logs and CloudWatch metrics allow for proactive monitoring and optimization. This architecture provides both resilience and scalability, ensuring uninterrupted service across multiple regions. The combination of CDN caching, health checks, and DNS-based routing forms a robust, globally optimized streaming architecture, which is essential for mission-critical video delivery in media and entertainment industries.
Question 152
An enterprise wants to establish private connectivity between multiple AWS accounts and their central networking VPC. The solution must support segmentation for development, testing, and production environments while minimizing the complexity of managing multiple peering connections. Which AWS service design pattern should be implemented?
A) AWS Transit Gateway with VPC attachments and route propagation
B) Direct Connect for each AWS account
C) VPC Peering for each environment
D) Site-to-Site VPN for each account
Answer: A
Explanation:
When managing multiple AWS accounts, environments, and VPCs, AWS Transit Gateway with VPC attachments is the most efficient and scalable design. Transit Gateway acts as a central hub for interconnecting multiple VPCs and on-premises networks, enabling route propagation between attached VPCs. This allows the enterprise to segregate traffic for development, testing, and production environments while maintaining centralized routing policies, significantly reducing operational complexity.
Option B) Direct Connect for each AWS account is impractical and costly, as creating multiple physical connections to accommodate each account or environment is operationally challenging and inefficient. Option C) VPC Peering is viable for a small number of connections but does not scale well. Each peering connection requires manual configuration, and the route tables must be carefully managed. In large multi-account environments, this becomes unmanageable and increases the risk of configuration errors. Option D) Site-to-Site VPN for each account introduces latency, limited bandwidth, and increased operational overhead while failing to centralize management.
Transit Gateway also allows integration with AWS Network Firewall and VPC Flow Logs, enabling enterprises to enforce security controls and monitor traffic flows across all connected environments. Route table segmentation allows developers to implement fine-grained traffic policies, ensuring that only authorized communications occur between environments. Furthermore, Transit Gateway supports inter-region peering, which provides flexibility for global deployments and disaster recovery strategies. Organizations can also leverage CloudWatch metrics to monitor network performance and detect anomalies proactively. By adopting this hub-and-spoke network architecture, enterprises achieve operational simplicity, enhanced security, and scalability while minimizing the risks associated with manual network management in multi-account, multi-environment deployments.
Question 153
A financial institution needs to deploy an AWS environment that meets strict compliance and security requirements. The solution must support encrypted communication between multiple VPCs and the on-premises datacenter while maintaining low latency and high availability. Which combination of AWS services and features best addresses this requirement?
A) Direct Connect with Transit Gateway and IPsec VPN fallback
B) VPC Peering with SSL/TLS encryption
C) Site-to-Site VPN with public internet routing
D) AWS CloudFront with WAF
Answer: A
Explanation:
For financial institutions that require low latency, high availability, and strong compliance for interconnectivity, Direct Connect with Transit Gateway combined with an IPsec VPN fallback provides a secure, reliable solution. Direct Connect offers dedicated private network connections to AWS, ensuring predictable bandwidth, low latency, and enhanced security compared to public internet connections. Transit Gateway enables multiple VPCs to communicate with the on-premises network through a central hub, minimizing configuration complexity and providing scalable connectivity.
The IPsec VPN fallback ensures business continuity if Direct Connect experiences disruption, providing encrypted communication through the public internet without compromising security. This hybrid model ensures compliance with strict regulatory requirements such as PCI DSS, SOX, or GDPR, which often mandate private connectivity with encryption and monitoring.
Option B) VPC Peering with SSL/TLS encryption only secures traffic within AWS VPCs. While TLS provides encryption in transit, VPC Peering cannot scale efficiently in multi-VPC or multi-account environments and does not provide connectivity to on-premises networks. Option C) Site-to-Site VPN over the public internet provides encrypted connectivity but suffers from variable latency, bandwidth constraints, and potential reliability issues, which may not meet strict SLAs required for financial workloads. Option D) AWS CloudFront with WAF is a global content delivery solution for public-facing web applications and does not address private connectivity or compliance requirements for sensitive internal communications.
Using Direct Connect with Transit Gateway allows organizations to implement traffic segmentation, centralized monitoring with CloudWatch, and integration with AWS Key Management Service (KMS) for encryption of sensitive data in transit. Route propagation through Transit Gateway enables seamless communication between multiple VPCs and the datacenter, while the VPN fallback guarantees continuity during outages. Additionally, security best practices such as access control lists (ACLs), Network Firewall policies, and monitoring for anomalous traffic enhance the overall security posture. This combination ensures a resilient, secure, and compliant networking architecture that meets the demanding requirements of financial institutions.
Question 154
A SaaS company wants to accelerate API requests between clients in different regions and their AWS backend. The architecture must reduce latency, improve performance, and provide resilience against regional failures. Which AWS service architecture is the most effective solution?
A) Amazon CloudFront with Lambda@Edge and Route 53 Latency-Based Routing
B) Direct Connect with Transit Gateway
C) Site-to-Site VPN with Elastic Load Balancer
D) VPC Peering across multiple regions
Answer: A
Explanation:
For globally distributed APIs, Amazon CloudFront with Lambda@Edge combined with Route 53 Latency-Based Routing provides low-latency, resilient access. CloudFront caches API responses at edge locations near clients, reducing round-trip times for repeated requests. Lambda@Edge allows developers to execute custom code on requests or responses, enabling dynamic request modification, authentication, or A/B testing closer to end-users. Route 53 latency-based routing ensures that clients are directed to the AWS region with the lowest latency, improving performance and ensuring availability during regional disruptions.
Option B) Direct Connect with Transit Gateway is suitable for private connectivity between on-premises data centers and VPCs but does not improve performance for globally distributed public APIs. Option C) Site-to-Site VPN with ELB is intended for secure connectivity to internal networks rather than public API acceleration. It cannot reduce latency for global clients effectively. Option D) VPC Peering across regions is operationally complex, does not offer caching, and fails to optimize global API latency.
CloudFront with Lambda@Edge also integrates with AWS WAF for request filtering and CloudWatch metrics for detailed performance and error monitoring. The architecture automatically handles failover if an origin in one region becomes unavailable, ensuring continuity. Edge caching reduces backend load, which decreases response times and improves user experience. Additionally, caching and request optimization reduce the cost associated with repeated API calls. By combining edge caching, intelligent routing, and serverless request handling, this solution ensures low-latency, high-performance, and resilient API delivery to a global customer base. This approach is particularly effective for SaaS platforms delivering APIs or microservices at scale.
Question 155
An organization wants to connect multiple on-premises offices to AWS while ensuring secure, highly available connectivity and optimized routing between locations. The solution must support redundancy and prevent single points of failure. Which AWS service design pattern best fulfills this requirement?
A) Dual AWS Direct Connect connections with Transit Gateway and VPN backup
B) Single Direct Connect connection per office with VPC Peering
C) Site-to-Site VPN for each office without redundancy
D) AWS CloudFront with Global Accelerator
Answer: A
Explanation:
For organizations requiring secure, highly available, and redundant connections from multiple on-premises offices to AWS, dual Direct Connect connections combined with Transit Gateway and VPN backup provide the most reliable solution. Using two Direct Connect links establishes physical redundancy, preventing a single point of failure. Transit Gateway centralizes network connectivity across all offices and VPCs, simplifying routing, enabling segmentation, and supporting inter-office communication efficiently.
The VPN backup provides encrypted failover over the public internet in case both Direct Connect links fail. This hybrid design ensures high availability, low latency, predictable performance, and operational resilience while meeting security and compliance standards.
Option B) Single Direct Connect per office lacks redundancy. If the connection fails, the office loses access to AWS resources, violating high-availability requirements. Option C) Site-to-Site VPN without redundancy is prone to outages and variable latency over the public internet. Option D) CloudFront with Global Accelerator is suitable for content delivery and global performance optimization, not for private office-to-AWS connectivity.
Using dual Direct Connect and Transit Gateway also allows traffic prioritization, VLAN segmentation, and monitoring via CloudWatch and VPC Flow Logs to detect anomalies. Route propagation ensures simplified configuration, and integration with AWS Network Firewall or other security controls enhances the overall security posture. This architecture guarantees secure, redundant, and resilient connectivity for distributed organizations, supporting both operational continuity and compliance requirements.
Question 156
A multinational corporation wants to implement a highly available and resilient multi-region web application in AWS. They require automatic failover if one AWS region becomes unavailable while ensuring minimal disruption to end-users. Which architecture and AWS service combination best meets these requirements?
A) Amazon Route 53 with health checks, multi-region active-active deployment, and Amazon CloudFront
B) VPC Peering between regions with Application Load Balancers
C) AWS Direct Connect from each region to the data center with no DNS failover
D) Site-to-Site VPN connections with Elastic Load Balancer
Answer: A
Explanation:
To achieve a resilient, globally available web application, leveraging Route 53 with health checks along with multi-region active-active deployment and Amazon CloudFront is the optimal approach. Route 53 provides DNS-based routing policies, such as failover, latency-based routing, and geo-proximity routing, which enable traffic to automatically route to healthy endpoints across multiple regions. Health checks continuously monitor application endpoints and ensure that traffic is only directed to regions that are operational.
CloudFront acts as a global content delivery network, caching static content at edge locations close to end-users, reducing latency and offloading origin servers. This combination ensures that even during regional outages, end-users experience minimal disruption because CloudFront can serve cached content, and Route 53 can redirect traffic to healthy regions.
Option B) VPC Peering across regions does not provide global DNS failover or traffic management capabilities. While it enables communication between VPCs, it does not address user experience or latency optimization for globally distributed clients. Option C) Direct Connect from each region is designed for private connectivity and predictable bandwidth but does not handle automated failover or end-user routing during regional outages. Option D) Site-to-Site VPN with ELB provides secure connections between networks but lacks global traffic management and multi-region failover capabilities.
This design also supports dynamic scaling, as resources in multiple regions can adjust independently based on demand. Integration with AWS CloudWatch and AWS X-Ray allows for monitoring application performance and troubleshooting latency issues. Additionally, the architecture supports TLS encryption, Web Application Firewall integration, and IAM-based access controls to maintain security compliance. Organizations benefit from reduced latency, improved resilience, and simplified disaster recovery by combining CloudFront edge caching, Route 53 intelligent routing, and active-active regional deployments. This architecture aligns with AWS best practices for multi-region, high-availability web applications.
Question 157
An enterprise is designing a secure network architecture that connects multiple branch offices to AWS. Each office must have a highly available connection with encryption and centralized routing control. Which architecture fulfills these requirements most efficiently?
A) Dual AWS Direct Connect connections with AWS Transit Gateway and VPN fallback
B) Single Direct Connect connection for each office with VPC Peering
C) Site-to-Site VPN for each office with no redundancy
D) CloudFront with regional endpoints and WAF
Answer: A
Explanation:
The most efficient solution for connecting multiple branch offices to AWS with high availability, encryption, and centralized routing control is dual Direct Connect connections combined with AWS Transit Gateway and VPN fallback. Direct Connect provides dedicated private connectivity from each office to AWS, offering predictable network performance, low latency, and high throughput, which is critical for enterprise workloads. Having dual connections ensures redundancy; if one physical connection fails, the second maintains continuous network availability.
Transit Gateway acts as a central hub that simplifies network management. It allows centralized routing between branch offices and multiple VPCs, eliminating the complexity of managing numerous peering relationships or individual route tables. Route propagation ensures that all connected networks can automatically learn the optimal paths without manual configuration, reducing operational overhead.
The VPN fallback over the public internet ensures continuity if both Direct Connect links are unavailable. The VPN tunnels are encrypted using IPsec, which satisfies security compliance requirements for sensitive corporate data. This architecture also supports integration with AWS Network Firewall for segmentation, CloudWatch for monitoring, and Flow Logs for auditing network traffic.
Option B) Single Direct Connect per office lacks redundancy, creating a single point of failure, which violates high-availability requirements. Option C) Site-to-Site VPN without redundancy is vulnerable to downtime and variable internet performance. Option D) CloudFront with WAF is primarily for public-facing content delivery and does not provide private connectivity for branch offices.
Using dual Direct Connect with Transit Gateway and VPN fallback offers several advantages: predictable bandwidth, centralized control, enhanced security, and robust disaster recovery. It supports traffic segmentation between production, development, and testing environments, while also providing compliance with industry standards like PCI DSS, HIPAA, and ISO 27001. This architecture is ideal for enterprises with globally distributed offices that require resilient, secure, and efficient connectivity to AWS resources.
Question 158
A SaaS provider wants to reduce the latency of API requests from global clients while maintaining high availability. The solution must also allow request customization and caching at edge locations. Which AWS architecture satisfies these requirements most effectively?
A) Amazon CloudFront with Lambda@Edge and Route 53 Latency-Based Routing
B) AWS Direct Connect with Transit Gateway
C) VPC Peering across regions with ELB
D) Site-to-Site VPN with NAT Gateway
Answer: A
Explanation:
For globally distributed API requests, CloudFront with Lambda@Edge combined with Route 53 Latency-Based Routing is the most effective solution. CloudFront caches API responses at edge locations near the client, reducing latency and offloading traffic from the origin server. Lambda@Edge allows execution of custom code on requests and responses, enabling features such as authentication, header modification, A/B testing, and content personalization at the edge.
Route 53 Latency-Based Routing ensures that clients are directed to the AWS region with the lowest network latency, improving response times and providing resilience in the event of regional failures. This architecture also integrates with AWS WAF for security against common web attacks and CloudWatch metrics for monitoring performance and troubleshooting anomalies.
Option B) Direct Connect with Transit Gateway is designed for private network connectivity and does not optimize latency for globally distributed clients. Option C) VPC Peering with ELB does not provide caching, request customization at the edge, or global traffic routing. Option D) Site-to-Site VPN with NAT Gateway provides secure connectivity but cannot reduce latency for global public traffic or offer edge caching.
This approach also enables cost optimization by reducing repeated requests to origin servers, decreasing backend load, and improving scalability. Integration with CloudFront Access Logs allows for detailed traffic analysis and auditing. Edge caching combined with intelligent routing ensures high availability and performance for a SaaS provider serving global clients, which is crucial for customer satisfaction and SLA compliance. Overall, this architecture delivers low latency, resilience, and advanced content handling capabilities, making it ideal for modern API-driven SaaS applications.
Question 159
A financial institution must securely connect its on-premises datacenter to multiple AWS VPCs across different regions. The solution must provide high availability, encryption, and centralized routing control while minimizing operational complexity. Which architecture is best suited for this scenario?
A) AWS Direct Connect with redundant connections, AWS Transit Gateway, and VPN fallback
B) Site-to-Site VPN without redundancy
C) VPC Peering for each VPC
D) CloudFront with Global Accelerator
Answer: A
Explanation:
For a financial institution, the highest priority is secure, highly available, and centrally managed connectivity between on-premises infrastructure and multiple AWS VPCs. The optimal design involves AWS Direct Connect with redundant connections to ensure continuous connectivity and predictable, low-latency network performance. Redundant connections prevent downtime due to link failures. AWS Transit Gateway acts as a central hub, enabling simplified routing and route propagation between multiple VPCs and the datacenter without the complexity of numerous peering connections.
A VPN fallback provides encrypted traffic over the public internet if Direct Connect links are unavailable, ensuring continuity and compliance with regulatory requirements. IPsec encryption and traffic segmentation provide additional security. CloudWatch and VPC Flow Logs facilitate monitoring, auditing, and anomaly detection.
Option B) Site-to-Site VPN without redundancy is insufficient for high availability and predictable performance. Option C) VPC Peering across multiple VPCs is operationally complex and does not support centralized routing for on-premises connectivity efficiently. Option D) CloudFront with Global Accelerator improves global performance for public content but does not provide private connectivity or encrypted links for sensitive financial data.
This architecture supports traffic prioritization, compliance requirements, and secure routing for development, testing, and production environments. Integration with AWS security services ensures network segmentation, monitoring, and policy enforcement, which is essential for high-risk industries. The hub-and-spoke model with Transit Gateway simplifies network topology while maintaining operational efficiency and robust connectivity, meeting the rigorous demands of financial institutions.
Question 160
A multinational organization wants to deploy a hybrid cloud architecture connecting multiple on-premises data centers with AWS. The network must be highly available, encrypted, and capable of supporting dynamic routing. Which solution best fulfills these requirements?
A) Dual AWS Direct Connect connections with Transit Gateway and IPsec VPN backup
B) Single Direct Connect connection with static routes
C) VPC Peering with Site-to-Site VPN for each datacenter
D) CloudFront with WAF and regional endpoints
Answer: A
Explanation:
For a hybrid cloud architecture spanning multiple on-premises data centers and AWS, dual Direct Connect connections with Transit Gateway and IPsec VPN backup provide the most resilient, secure, and scalable solution. Dual Direct Connect ensures redundancy and high throughput, while Transit Gateway centralizes routing control, enabling dynamic route propagation between multiple VPCs and on-premises networks. This eliminates the operational complexity of managing individual peering or VPN connections for each environment.
The IPsec VPN backup provides encrypted failover over the internet if Direct Connect links fail, ensuring business continuity. Integration with AWS Network Firewall, Flow Logs, and CloudWatch allows real-time monitoring, policy enforcement, and auditing. Dynamic routing protocols supported by Transit Gateway reduce manual configuration errors and facilitate scalable, hybrid connectivity.
Option B) Single Direct Connect with static routes lacks redundancy and flexibility, exposing the architecture to downtime and operational overhead. Option C) VPC Peering with VPNs for each datacenter becomes complex, difficult to manage at scale, and does not provide centralized routing control. Option D) CloudFront with WAF improves global content delivery but does not address private connectivity or hybrid cloud networking requirements.
This design provides predictable performance, high availability, encryption for compliance, and scalable routing. The architecture allows segmentation between development, testing, and production traffic, supports disaster recovery, and ensures compliance with security standards such as HIPAA, PCI DSS, and ISO 27001. Organizations benefit from simplified management, resilient hybrid connectivity, and a robust networking framework that supports both operational and regulatory requirements.
